A mixture of 0.438 M H2, 0.444 M I2 , and 0.895 M HI is enclosed in a vessel and heated to 430 °C. H2 (g) + I2 (g) <-----> 2 HI (g) Kc = 54.3 at 430∘C Calculate the equilibrium concentrations of each gas at 430∘C.

Answer:

The reaction decomposes more as T increases, therefore it is ENDOTHERMIC, meaning it requires energy to form CO and O₂.

Kp for each specie...

Kp = CO^2 O2 / (CO2)^2

for

T = 1500

Assume 1 atm for CO2, after % dissociation

P-CO2 left = 1*(1-0.048/100)= 0.99952

P-CO formed = 1-0.99952 = 0.00048

P-O2 = (1-0.99952)/2 = 0.00024

so..

Kp = CO^2 O2 / (CO2)^2

Kp = (0.00048^2)(0.00024) / (0.99952^2) = 5.53*10^-11

T = 2500

Assume 1 atm for CO2, after % dissociation

P-CO2 left = 1*(1-17.6/100)= 0.824

P-CO formed = 1-0.824= 0.176

P-O2 = (1-0.176)/2 = 0.088

so..

Kp = CO^2 O2 / (CO2)^2

Kp = (0.176^2)(0.088) / (0.824^2) =0.0040

T = 3000

Assume 1 atm for CO2, after % dissociation

P-CO2 left = 1*(1-54.8/100)= 0.452

P-CO formed = 1-0.452= 0.548

P-O2 = (1-0.452)/2 = 0.274

so..

Kp = CO^2 O2 / (CO2)^2

Kp = (0.548^2)(0.274) / (0.452^2) =0.4027

Explanation:

To find the Ksp of copper(I) chloride at 25 ºC with a solubility of 1.00 x 10^-3 mol/L, the Ksp value is calculated to be 1.00 x 10^-6.

Ksp = [Ag+][Cl-] = (1.67 × 10^-5)² = 2.79 × 10^-10

Therefore, at 25°C, the Ksp value of copper(I) chloride would be 1.00 x 10^-6 as calculated from the given solubility information.

Remember the formula for Ksp and plug in the given values to obtain the accurate result for the given conditions.

Complete Question

The complete question is shown on the first uploaded image

Answer:

The predominate specie is [tex]HCO_3^-[/tex]

Explanation:

From the question we can see that [tex]pk_{a1}(6.351) < pH(6.73) pk_{a2}(10.329)[/tex]

Hence looking at the question we can see that the predominant specie is [tex]HCO_3^-[/tex]  

Final answer:

At a pH of 6.73, which is between the pKa₁ (6.351) and pKa₂ (10.329) of carbonic acid, the predominant form of carbonic acid is HCO³⁻ (bicarbonate ion).

Explanation:

The question pertains to the acid dissociation of carbonic acid (H₂CO₃) and which form is predominant at a certain pH. Carbonic acid is a diprotic weak acid, which means it can donate two protons (H⁺), and has two dissociation steps each with different pKa values.

The pKa₁ of carbonic acid is 6.351, and below this pH, the predominant form of carbonic acid is H₂CO₃. The pKa₂ is 10.329, and above this pH, the carbonate ion (CO₃²⁻) is predominant. Between these pKa values, the bicarbonate ion (HCO³⁻) is the predominant species. Therefore, at a pH of 6.73, which lies between the two pKa values, the predominant form is HCO³⁻ (bicarbonate ion).

The question is incomplete, here is the complete question:

428. mg of an unknown protein are dissolved in enough solvent to make 5.00 mL of solution. The osmotic pressure of this solution is measured to be 0.0766 atm at 25.0°C. Calculate the molar mass of the protein. Round your answer to 3 significant digits

Answer: The molar mass of protein is [tex]27.3\times 10^3g/mol[/tex]

Explanation:

To calculate the concentration of solute, we use the equation for osmotic pressure, which is:

[tex]\pi=iMRT[/tex]

Or,

[tex]\pi=i\times \frac{\text{Mass of solute}\times 1000}{\text{Molar mass of solute}\times \text{Volume of solution (in mL)}}\times RT[/tex]

where,

[tex]\pi[/tex] = osmotic pressure of the solution = 0.0766 atm

i = Van't hoff factor = 1 (for non-electrolytes)

Mass of solute (protein) = 428 mg = 0.428 g   (Conversion factor: 1 g = 1000 mg)

Volume of solution = 5.00 mL

R = Gas constant = [tex]0.0821\text{ L.atm }mol^{-1}K^{-1}[/tex]

T = temperature of the solution = [tex]25^oC=[273+25]=298K[/tex]

Putting values in above equation, we get:

[tex]0.0766=1\times \frac{0.428\times 1000}{\text{Molar mass of protein}\times 5}\times 0.0821\text{ L. atm }mol^{-1}K^{-1}\times 298K\\\\\text{Molar mass of protein}=\frac{1\times 0.428\times 1000\times 0.0821\times 298}{0.0766\times 5}=27340.4g/mol=27.3\times 10^3g/mol[/tex]

Hence, the molar mass of protein is [tex]27.3\times 10^3g/mol[/tex]

Answer:

The specific heat of the copper is 0.771 cal/ grams °C

Explanation:

Step 1: Data given

Mass of the piece of copper = 15.0 grams

The temperature of the wire changes from 12.0 °C to 79.0 °C

The amount of heat absorbed is 775 cal

Step 2: Calculate the specific heat of copper

Q = m*c*ΔT

⇒with Q = the heat absorbed = 775 cal

⇒with m = the mass of the copper = 15.0 grams

⇒with c = the specific heat of copper = TO BE DETERMINED

⇒with ΔT = The change in temperature = 79.0 °C - 12.0 °C = 67.0 °C

775 cal = 15.0 grams * c * 67.0 °C

c = 0.771 cal/gm °C

The specific heat of the copper is 0.771 cal/ grams °C

Explanation:

It is known that,

      No. of moles = Molarity × Volume

So, we will calculate the moles of [tex]H_{3}PO_{4}[/tex] as follows.

         No. of moles = [tex]0.227 \times 0.055 L[/tex]

                                = 0.0125 mol

Now, the moles of KOH are as follows.

       No. of moles = [tex]0.680 \times 0.055 L[/tex]

                                = 0.0374 mol

And, [tex]3 \times \text{moles of} H_{3}PO_{4}[/tex] = [tex]3 \times 0.0125[/tex]

                             = 0.0375 mol

Now, the balanced reaction equation is as follows.

     [tex]H_{3}PO_{4}(aq) + 3KOH(aq) \rightarrow 3H_{2}O(l) + K_{3}PO_{4}(aq) + 173.2 kJ[/tex]

This means 1 mole of [tex]H_{3}PO_{4}[/tex] produces 173.2 kJ of heat. And, the amount of heat produced by 0.0125 moles of [tex]H_{3}PO_{4}[/tex] is as follows.

         M = [tex]\frac{0.0125 mol \times 173.2 kJ}{1}[/tex]

             = 2.165 kJ

Total volume of the solution = (55.0 + 55.0) ml

                                               = 110 ml

Density of the solution = 1.13 g/ml

Mass of the solution = Volume × Density

                                  = [tex]110 ml \times 1.13 g/ml[/tex]

                                  = 124.3 g

Specific heat = 3.78 [tex]J/g^{o}C[/tex]

Now, we will calculate the final temperature as follows.

              q = [tex]mC \times \Delta T[/tex]

          2165 J = [tex]124.3 \times 3.78 \times (T - 22.62)^{o}C[/tex]

        2165 - 469.854 = [tex]T - 22.62^{o}C[/tex]

           17.417 = [tex]T - 22.62^{o}C[/tex]

               T = [tex]40.04^{o}C[/tex]

Thus, we can conclude that final temperature of the solution is [tex]40.04^{o}C[/tex].

The final temperature of the solution after neutralization of H3PO4 with KOH is determined to be 27.24°C based on the enthalpy change, specific heat capacity of the solution, and the mass of the final mixture.

To predict the final temperature of the solution after the neutralization reaction of H3PO4 with KOH, we must first determine the amount of heat released during the reaction using the enthalpy change given and then apply this to the specific heat capacity equation of the resulting solution. Given that the reaction is exothermic and releases 173.2 kJ per mole of H3PO4 reacted, we first need to figure out how many moles of H3PO4 are reacting. Then we calculate the heat (q) released using the molarity and volume of H3PO4.

Moles of H3PO4 = 0.227 M × 0.055 L = 0.012485 mol

Heat released (q) = 0.012485 mol × 173.2 kJ/mol = 2.16322 kJ

Now convert q to Joules (1 kJ = 1000 J) and calculate the resulting temperature change using the mass of the solution (density × volume), specific heat capacity, and heat equation (q = mcΔT). The total volume of the solution is 110.0 mL, yielding a total mass of 124.3 g (1.13 g/mL × 110 mL).

Converting q to Joules: q = 2.16322 kJ × 1000 J/kJ = 2163.22 J

Using the equation ΔT = q / (mc), where m is mass and c is specific heat capacity,

ΔT = 2163.22 J / (124.3 g × 3.78 J/g°C) = 4.62°C

Therefore, the final temperature of the solution is 22.62°C + 4.62°C = 27.24°C.

Answer:

Carbon dioxide and acetoacetic acid

Explanation:

Oxaloacetic acid is a β-keto acid. It decarboxylates readily via a six-membered cyclic transition state.

The initial products are carbon dioxide and the enol of a ketone.

The enol is unstable and rapidly tautomerizes to the more stable keto form — acetoacetic acid.

Pyruvic acid and carbon dioxide were formed when oxyaloacetic acid decomposes, and the further discussion can be defined as follows:

Learn more about the Oxaloacetic acid here:

brainly.com/question/21990765

Answer:

Light of wavelength 200 nm will have lowest frequency in while traveling through diamond.

Explanation:

Speed of the light in vacuum = c

Relation between speed of light , wavelength (λ) and frequency (ν);

[tex]\nu =\frac{c}{\lambda }[/tex]

Speed of light in a medium = c' = c/n

[tex]\nu =\frac{c'}{\lambda }=\frac{c}{n\times \lambda }[/tex]...[1]

Where : n = refractive index of a medium

So, the medium with greater value of refractive index lower the speed of light to greater extent.

From [1] , we can see that frequency of light is inversely proportional to the refractive index of the medium :

[tex]\nu \propto \frac{1}{n} [/tex]

This means that higher the value of refractive index lower will be the value of frequency of light in that medium or vice-versa.

According to question, light of wavelength 200 nm will have lowest frequency in while traveling through diamond because refractive index of diamond out of the given mediums is greatest.

Increasing order of refractive indices:

[tex]H_2<H_2O<CCL_4<\text{Silicon oil}< Diamond[/tex]

Decreasing order of frequency of light 210 nm in these medium :

[tex]H_2>H_2O>CCL_4>\text{Silicon oil}> Diamond[/tex]

Answer: The value of the equilibrium constant is 0.024

Explanation:

Initial moles of  [tex]NOBr[/tex] = 0.612 mole

Volume of container = 100 L

Initial concentration of [tex]NOBr=\frac{moles}{volume}=\frac{0.612moles}{100L}=6.12\times 10^{-3}M[/tex]  

equilibrium concentration of [tex]Br_2=2.12\times 10^{-3}M[/tex]

Equilibrium constant is the ratio of the concentration of products to the concentration of reactants each term raised to its stochiometric coefficients.

The given balanced equilibrium reaction is,

[tex]NOBr(g)\rightleftharpoons NO(g)+\frac{1}{2}Br_2(g)[/tex]

at t=0   [tex]6.12\times 10^{-3}M[/tex]     0       0

At eqm. conc. [tex](6.12\times 10^{-3}-x)M[/tex]      x       x/2     

The expression for equilibrium constant for this reaction will be,

[tex]K_c=\frac{[NO]^2[Br_2]}{[NOBr]}[/tex]

[tex]K_c=\frac{(2x)^2\times x/2}{(6.12\times 10^{-3}-x)}[/tex]

we are given : x/2 =[tex]2.12\times 10^{-3}[/tex]

Now put all the given values in this expression, we get :

[tex]K_c=\frac{(2.12\times 10^{-3})^{\frac{1}{2}}\times (2.12\times 10^{-3})}{(6.12\times 10^{-3})-(2.12\times 10^{-3})}[/tex]

[tex]K_c=0.024[/tex]

Thus the value of the equilibrium constant is 0.024

Answer:

The answer is attached and other details about the answer is also attached.

Explanation:

The molecular formula (C9H10O2) indicates five

degrees of unsaturation (see Section 14.16), which is

strongly suggestive of an aromatic ring, as well as one

additional double bond or ring. The signal just above

3000 cm-1 in the IR spectrum confirms the aromatic ring,

as does the signal just above 1600 cm-1. The 1

H NMR

spectrum exhibits two doublets between 6.9 and 7.9

ppm, each with an integration of 2. This is the

characteristic pattern of a disubstituted aromatic ring, in

which the two substituents are different from each other:

The singlet at 3.9 ppm (with an integration of 3)

represents a methyl group. The chemical shift is

downfield from the expected benchmark value of 0.9

ppm for a methyl group, indicating that it is likely next to

an oxygen atom:

The singlet at 2.6 ppm (with an integration of 3)

represents an isolated methyl group. The chemical shift

of this signal suggests that the methyl group is

neighboring a carbonyl group:

The carbonyl group accounts for one degree of

unsaturation, and together with the aromatic ring, this

would account for all five degrees of unsaturation. The

presence of a carbonyl group is also confirmed by the

signal at 196.6 ppm in the 13C NMR spectrum.

We have uncovered three pieces, which can only be

connected in one way, as shown:

This structure is consistent with the 13C NMR data: four

signals for the sp2 hybridized carbon atoms of the

aromatic ring, and two signals for the sp3 hybridized

carbon atoms (one of which is above 50 ppm because it

is next to an oxygen atom).

Also notice that the carbonyl group is conjugated to the

aromatic ring, which explains why the signal for the

C=O bond in the IR spectrum appears at 1676 cm-1,

rather than 1720 cm-1.

Answer:

The diagram of the Possibilities Frontier (PPF) is shown on the first uploaded image

A Possibilities Frontier (PPF)  can also be referred to as the production possibility curve and it can be defined as a curve that denotes the production of two types of goods in an economy at a given period of time in different proportion of combinations

When this curve shift to the right it means that there is technological advancement in that economy

If this curve a points lies within it then the resources are not fully utilized    

Explanation:

Answer : The rate of the reaction if the concentration of [tex]CH_3Br[/tex] is doubled is, 0.006 M/s

Explanation :

Rate law : It is defined as the expression which expresses the rate of the reaction in terms of molar concentration of the reactants with each term raised to the power their stoichiometric coefficient of that reactant in the balanced chemical equation.

The balanced equations will be:

[tex]CH_3Br+NaOH\rightarrow CH_3OH+NaBr[/tex]

In this reaction, [tex]CH_3Br[/tex] and [tex]NaOH[/tex] are the reactants.

The rate law expression for the reaction is:

[tex]\text{Rate}=k[CH_3Br][NaOH][/tex]

As we are given that:

[tex][CH_3Br][/tex] = concentration of [tex]CH_3Br[/tex] = 0.100 M

[tex][NaOH][/tex] = concentration of [tex]NaOH[/tex] = 0.100 M

Rate = 0.0030 M/s

Now put all the given values in the above expression, we get:

[tex]0.0030M/s=k\times (0.100M)\times (0.100M)[/tex]

[tex]k=0.3M^{-1}s^{-1}[/tex]

Now we have to calculate the rate of the reaction if the concentration of [tex]CH_3Br[/tex] is doubled.

[tex]\text{Rate}=k[CH_3Br][NaOH][/tex]

[tex]\text{Rate}=(0.3M^{-1}s^{-1})\times (2\times 0.100M)\times (0.100M)[/tex]

[tex]\text{Rate}=0.006M/s[/tex]

Thus, the rate of the reaction if the concentration of [tex]CH_3Br[/tex] is doubled is, 0.006 M/s

Answer:

7.79 moles

Explanation:

Let the mass of helium gas = Mass of argon gas = x g

Moles of helium = [tex]\frac{x}{4}[/tex] moles

Moles of argon = [tex]\frac{x}{40}[/tex] moles

Total moles = [tex]\frac{x}{4}+\frac{x}{40}=\frac{11x}{40}\ moles[/tex]

Given that:

Temperature = 398 K

V = 80.0 L

Pressure = 3.50 atm

Using ideal gas equation as:

PV=nRT

where,  

P is the pressure

V is the volume

n is the number of moles

T is the temperature  

R is Gas constant having value = 0.0821 L atm/ K mol  

Applying the equation as:

[tex]3.50\times 80.0=\frac{11x}{40}\times 0.0821\times 398[/tex]

x=31.16 g

Moles of helium = 31.16 / 4 = 7.79 moles

The mixture contains approximately 7.79 moles of helium."

To solve this problem, we will use the Ideal Gas Law, which is given by the equation PV = nRT, where P is the pressure, V is the volume, n is the number of moles, R is the ideal gas constant, and T is the temperature in Kelvin.

Given:

- The total volume of the gas mixture (V) is 80.0 L.

- The temperature of the gas mixture (T) is 398 K.

- The pressure of the gas mixture (P) is 3.50 atm.

- The mass of helium gas (m_He) is equal to the mass of argon gas (m_Ar).

First, we need to find the total number of moles of gas in the mixture using the Ideal Gas Law:

[tex]\[ PV = nRT \][/tex]

We can rearrange this equation to solve for the total number of moles (n_total):

[tex]\[ n_{\text{total}} = \frac{PV}{RT} \][/tex]

The value of the ideal gas constant (R) is 0.0821 L·atm/(mol·K). Plugging in the given values:

[tex]\[ n_{\text{total}} = \frac{(3.50 \, \text{atm})(80.0 \, \text{L})}{(0.0821 \, \text{L·atm/(mol·K)})(398 \, \text{K})} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ n_{\text{total}} = \frac{280 \, \text{atm·L}}{32.6028 \, \text{atm·L/mol}} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ n_{\text{total}} \approx 8.59 \, \text{mol} \][/tex]

Since the mass of helium is equal to the mass of argon, and assuming no other gases are present, the mixture consists of two parts: one part helium and one part argon by mass. Therefore, the moles of helium (n_He) and the moles of argon (n_Ar) are in the same ratio as their molar masses. The molar mass of helium (M_He) is approximately 4.0026 g/mol and the molar mass of argon (M_Ar) is approximately 39.948 g/mol.

The ratio of the number of moles of helium to the total number of moles is the same as the ratio of the molar mass of argon to the sum of the molar masses of helium and argon:

[tex]\[ \frac{n_{\text{He}}}{n_{\text{total}}} = \frac{M_{\text{Ar}}}{M_{\text{He}} + M_{\text{Ar}}} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ \frac{n_{\text{He}}}{8.59 \, \text{mol}} = \frac{39.948 \, \text{g/mol}}{4.0026 \, \text{g/mol} + 39.948 \, \text{g/mol}} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ \frac{n_{\text{He}}}{8.59 \, \text{mol}} = \frac{39.948}{43.9506} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ \frac{n_{\text{He}}}{8.59 \, \text{mol}} \approx 0.9087 \][/tex]

[tex]\[ n_{\text{He}} \approx 8.59 \, \text{mol} \times 0.9087 \][/tex]

[tex]\[ n_{\text{He}} \approx 7.79 \, \text{mol} \][/tex]

Therefore, the mixture contains approximately 7.79 moles of helium."

Answer:

In order to ensure consistent membrane fluidity

Explanation:

Cold-blooded animals rely on the temperature of the surrounding environment to maintain its internal temperature, their blood is not cold.  Their body temperature fluctuates,  based on the external temperature of the environment. If it  is 30 °F outside, their body temperature  will eventually normalize to  30 °F, as well. If it eventually rises to 120 °F, their body temperature will follow the same pattern to 120 °F.

The cell membrane of cold-blooded animals contains cholesterol, which acts as a shield for the membrane. Membrane fluidity is enhanced by temperature, as the temperature increases membrane fluidity increases and it decreases when the temperature goes down.

Most cold-blooded animals adjust their feeding habit to contain  more unsaturated fats from plants. This helps them to maintain their motor coordination and membrane fluidity during the long winter

Cold-blooded animals modulate the fatty acid composition of their membrane to stabilize their membrane fluidity

Old-blooded animals modulate the fatty acid composition of their membranes as a function of temperature to ensure consistent membrane fluidity, and cholesterol plays a role in maintaining appropriate fluidity across a range of temperatures.

Old-blooded animals, also known as poikilothermic organisms, modulate the fatty acid composition of their membranes in response to temperature changes. This modulation helps them maintain consistent membrane fluidity, which is crucial for proper cell function. These animals increase the unsaturated fatty acid content of their cell membranes in colder temperatures and increase the saturated fatty acid content in higher temperatures. Additionally, cholesterol, which lies alongside phospholipids in the membrane, acts as a buffer to dampen the effects of temperature on the membrane, extending the range of temperature in which the membrane is appropriately fluid and functional. Cholesterol also serves other functions, such as organizing clusters of transmembrane proteins into lipid rafts.

Answer:

[tex]A(t) = 1600 - e^{-(\frac{t}{250} - 7.33)}[/tex]

Explanation:

A(t) is the amount of salt in the tank at time t, measured in kilograms.

A(0) = 70

[tex]\frac{dA}{dt} =[/tex]rate in - rate out

=0.4* 16 - (A/1000)*4

=  [tex]\frac{1600 - A}{250}[/tex] kg/min

[tex]\int\limits {\frac{1}{1600-A} } \, dA = \int\ {\frac{1}{250} } \, dt\\\\ -ln(1600-A) = \frac{t}{250} + C\\\\[/tex]

A(0) = 70

-ln (1600 - 70) = 0/250  + C

-7.33 =  C

[tex]-ln(1600-A) = \frac{t}{250} - 7.33\\\\[/tex]

[tex]1600 - A = e^{-(\frac{t}{250} - 7.33)} \\\\A = 1600 - e^{-(\frac{t}{250} - 7.33)}[/tex][tex]1600-A = e^{-(\frac{t}{250} - 7.33)} \\\\ A = 1600 - e^{-(\frac{t}{250} - 7.33)}[/tex]

Answer:

Explanation:

The detailed and step by step analysis is as shown in the atached file with appropriate substitution.

Answer:

Hi, you haven't provided the options to the question, so I will just give the answer in my own words and you can check with the options.

Answer is: The COOPERATIVE binding oxygen to hemoglobin is facilitated by changes in protein conformation upon oxygen binding to one subunit that affect the binding of oxygen to another subunit.

Explanation:

     Hemoglobin, which is a complex protein contained within our red blood cells is an alternative source of transportation of oxygen through our body. With hemoglobin, we can carry 20 ml of oxygen in that same 100 ml of blood.

    The way by which hemoglobin binds oxygen is referred to as cooperative binding. The binding of oxygen to hemoglobin makes it easier for more oxygen to bind.

     For example: during the cooperative binding of oxygen to hemoglobin, using four oxygen molecules. The binding of one oxygen molecule causes a change in conformation allowing the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th molecules to bind more efficiently to the hemoglobin.

     Therefore, the answer to the question is COOPERATIVE.

Hemoglobin exhibits cooperative binding of oxygen, characterized by easier binding of the second and third oxygen molecules, and visualized through an S-shaped oxygen dissociation curve.

Cooperative Binding of Oxygen to Hemoglobin

The cooperative binding of oxygen to hemoglobin is facilitated by changes in protein conformation upon oxygen binding to one subunit that affect the binding of oxygen to another subunit. When oxygen binds to the heme group in one of the subunits within the hemoglobin molecule, this causes a conformational change facilitating the binding of the subsequent oxygen molecules. Initially, it is easier to bind the second and third oxygen molecules to hemoglobin than the first due to these structural changes. However, the binding of the fourth oxygen molecule is more difficult. This process can be visualized in the sigmoidal or S-shaped oxygen dissociation curve, which shows hemoglobin saturation with oxygen as the partial pressure of oxygen increases.

Furthermore, factors such as pH, temperature, and the presence of 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate also influence the ease of oxygen binding and dissociation from hemoglobin. For instance, fetal hemoglobin demonstrates a higher affinity for oxygen compared to adult hemoglobin. The dynamic nature of hemoglobin's affinity for oxygen is crucial for its role in transporting and releasing oxygen throughout the body, a process modulated by the partial pressure of oxygen in various environments such as the lungs and peripheral tissues.

Answer: the structures are shown in the image attached.

Explanation:

Before the invention of mordern spectroscopy, Korner's absolute method was commonly applied in determining whether a disubstituted benzene derivative was the ortho, meta, or para isomer. Korner's method depends on the addition of a third group, nitro groups are usually added. The number of isomers formed is then determined. The isomers are usually obtained only in small amounts and analysed to know the structure of the original compound.

Final answer:

The original compound is p-bromotoluene or 4-bromotoluene. The three nitrated derivatives are m-dinitrobenzene or 1,3-dinitrobenzene.

Explanation:

The turn-of-the-century chemist isolated a compound with the molecular formula C6H4Br2. After nitrating this compound, three isomers of formula C6H3Br2NO2 were obtained.

The original compound is called p-bromotoluene or 4-bromotoluene. It contains a methyl (CH3) group and the bromine atom is attached to the fourth carbon atom.

The three nitrated derivatives are called m-dinitrobenzene or 1,3-dinitrobenzene. These compounds have two nitro (NO2) groups attached to the benzene ring, at the first and third positions.

Explanation:

(a)  When we place the bulb of thermometer below then there would be vapors due to high temperature. And, since you are measuring temperature of the vapors closer to when evaporated.

As a result, there will be inaccurate temperature reading (higher than the actual reading).

(b)   When we place the bulb above the condenser then we are not able to measure the vapors directly as they are escaping into the condenser before their temperature can be measured.

As a result, we will get inaccurate results of room temperature.

Answer:

0.050 m LiBrm LiBr < 0.120 mm glucose <0.050 m Zn(NO3)2m Zn(NO3)2

Explanation:

The above aqueous solutions show that LiBr low boiling point followed by glucose and Zinc.

using the equation of boiling point elevation

ΔTb = i×Kb×M

Making temperature constant at a value of 290K you can simple do a calculation to conform the boiling point.

looking the van hoff values for Znc = 3 , LiBr = 2 and glucose = 1

(glucose)ΔTb = i×Kb×M = 1×290k×0.120 = 34.8

(Zinc) = 3×290×0.050 = 43.5

(LiBr)  = 2×290×0.050 =29

∴ in conclusion LiBr has a the lowest decreasing boiling point

Based on the concentration of the solutions, the rank order of the solutions in terms of decreasing boiling point is 0.050 m LiBr < 0.120 mm glucose < 0.050 m Zn(NO3)2.

The boiling point of a liquid solution is the temperature at which the liquid begins to boil and change to vapor.

The concentration of each solution can be used to determine its boiling point.

Usng the equation of boiling point elevation:

where:

The van hoff values for Zn(NO3)2 = 3 , LiBr = 2 and glucose = 1

Siince water is the solvent in all solutions,

Kb of water = 0.512 and boiling point of water = 100°C

Calculating the boiling point elevation:

For Glucose

ΔTb = 1 × 0.512 × 0.120 = 0.061°C

For Zn(NO3)2

ΔTb = 3 × 0.512 × 0.050 = 0.0768°C

For LiBr

ΔTb = 2 × 0.512 × 0.050 = 0.0512°C

LiBr elevates the boiling point of water the least.

Therefore, based on the concentration of the solutions, the rank order of the solutions in terms of decreasing boiling point is 0.050 m LiBr < 0.120 mm glucose < 0.050 m Zn(NO3)2.

Learn more about boiling point elevation at: https://brainly.com/question/4206205

If your unknown solid has an impurity that is insoluble in cyclohexane the molar mass of the unknown solid being recorded as high.

Impurities are chemical substances inside a certain amount of liquid, gas, or solid, but are different from the chemical composition of the material itself.

Also,  there will be an increase in molecular weight obtained because the mass of the solute would now include the actual mass of solute that is changing and the excess mass of the impurity from the unknown solid this will increase the molar mass.

Therefore, If your unknown solid has an impurity that is insoluble in cyclohexane the molar mass of the unknown solid is recorded as high.

For more details on chemical impurities https://brainly.com/question/14158759

If the impurity is insoluble in cyclohexane, it will not affect the molar mass of the unknown solid.

If your unknown solid has an impurity that is insoluble in cyclohexane, it will not affect the molar mass of the unknown solid. This is because the impurity is insoluble and therefore does not dissolve in the cyclohexane solvent. The molar mass is determined by the mass of the solute and the number of moles present, and since the impurity does not dissolve, it does not contribute to the mass or molar mass of the unknown solid.

mpurities can significantly affect the structure and properties of a solid. Even a small amount of impurity can disrupt the regular lattice of crystal structures, altering physical properties like melting point and electrical conductivity, which is a crucial consideration in industries such as electronics that require high-purity materials.

Answer:

1.38 M is the concentration of blue solution.

Explanation:

The equation of calibration curve:

[tex]A=\epsilon \times l\times c[/tex]

where,

A = absorbance of solution

C = concentration of solution

l = path length

[tex]\epsilon[/tex] = molar absorptivity coefficient

The graph between A and c will straight line with slope equal to prduct of [tex]\epsilon and l[/tex].

y = 0.194 x + 0.025.

A = 0.194 c+ 0.025

Given the absorbance of solution :

A = 0.293

So, concentration at this value of absorbance will be= c

[tex]0.293=0.194 c+0.025[/tex]

[tex]c=\frac{0.293-0.025}{0.194}=1.381\approx 1.38[/tex]

1.38 M is the concentration of blue solution.

The concentration of the Blue #1 solution can be calculated by rearranging the equation of the calibration curve to solve for 'x' when 'y' is the measured absorbance, 0.293. The calculated concentration to three decimal places is approximately 1.381.

The equation of the straight line formed by your calibration curve for Blue #1 at 635 nm is y = 0.194x + 0.025. In this equation, 'y' represents the measured absorbance and 'x' represents the concentration. If the measured absorbance, or 'y', is 0.293, you can calculate the concentration, or 'x', by rearranging the equation to solve for 'x'.

To isolate 'x', you would subtract 0.025 from each side of your equation.

0.293 - 0.025 = 0.194x, which simplifies to 0.268 = 0.194x. Finally, divide each side of the equation by 0.194 to solve for 'x':

0.268 / 0.194 = x

When you divide 0.268 by 0.194, you get approximately 1.381. Therefore the concentration of the Blue #1 solution to three decimal places is approximately 1.381.

https://brainly.com/question/29729322

#SPJ3

The total heat change for the process of ice melting at -6.5oC can be calculated by considering the temperature change and the phase change. The correct calculations are: temperature change is 337.25 J and phase change is 150.5 J. The total heat change is 487.75 J or 0.48775 kJ.

The total heat change for the process of ice melting at -6.5oC can be calculated by considering the temperature change from -6.5oC to 0.0oC and the phase change from solid to liquid.

For the temperature change, we use the equation q = m * C * ΔT, where q is the heat change, m is the mass of ice, C is the specific heat capacity of ice, and ΔT is the temperature change. Plugging in the values, we get q = 25.0 g * 2.09 J/g.°C * (0.0-(-6.5)°C) = 337.25 J. This calculation is incorrectly represented as option A.

For the phase change, we use the equation q = m * ΔH, where q is the heat change, m is the mass of ice, and ΔH is the enthalpy of fusion. Plugging in the values, we get q = 25.0 g * 6.02 kJ/mol = 150.5 J. This calculation is incorrectly represented as option B.

Since there are only two stages in this process (temperature change and phase change), option C is false.

Therefore, the correct calculations to determine the total heat change for this process are: the temperature change is 337.25 J and the phase change is 150.5 J. Adding these up, the total heat change is 487.75 J, which is equivalent to 0.48775 kJ. This calculation is incorrectly represented as option D but not as option E.

https://brainly.com/question/34039707

#SPJ11

Answer:

4.1

Explanation:

First, we will calculate the moles of each species.

The volume of the mixture is 0.225 L + 0.435 L = 0.660 L

The concentration of the species in the buffer are:

We can find the pH of the buffer using the Henderson-Hasselbach equation.

pH = pKa + log [lactate] / [lactic acid]

pH = -log 1.38 × 10⁻⁴ + log 0.45 M / 0.29 M

pH = 4.1

Answer:

SiO2(s) + 3C(s)  ------> SiC(s) + 2CO(g)

Explanation:

The formula for silicon oxide is SiO2 and carbon is C. silicon carbide is SiC

and carbon monoxide is CO.

An arrow is always used to separate the reactants (left) and products (right).

A balanced equation must contain equal number of atoms in each side of the equation.

For example in the equation above, there are 1 atom of silicon appears on each side; 2 atoms of oxygen and three atoms of carbon.

Answer: SiO₂(s) + 2 C(s) → Si(s) + 2 CO(g)

Explanation:

There are 2 C in the reactants rather than 3. That way the equation is properly balanced.

Answer:

1

Explanation:

The principal quantum number, n, showsthe principal electron shell. which can inturn be describe as the most probable distance of the electrons from the nucleus, the larger the number n is, the farther the electron is from the nucleus, the larger the size of the orbital, and the larger the atom is. n can be any positive integer starting at 1, as n=1 designates the first principal shell (the innermost shell). When an electron is in an excited state or it gains energy, it may jump to the second principle shell, where n=2

As the energy of the electron increases, so does the principal quantum number, e.g., n = 3 indicates the third principal shell, n = 4 indicates the fourth principal shell, and so on. n=1,2,3,4…

On the other hand, the magnetic quantum number ml determines the number of orbitals and their orientation within a subshell. Consequently, its value depends on the orbital angular momentum quantum number l. Given a certain l, ml is an interval ranging from –l to +l, so it can be zero, a negative integer, or a positive integer. ml=−l,(−l+1),(−l+2),…,−2,−1,0,1,2,…(l–1),(l–2),+l

note also that: The orbital angular momentum quantum number l determines the shape of an orbital, and therefore the angular distribution. The number of angular nodes is equal to the value of the angular momentum quantum number l. Each value of l indicates a specific s, p, d, f subshell (each unique in shape.) The value of l is dependent on the principal quantum number n. Unlike n, the value of l can be zero. It can also be a positive integer, but it cannot be larger than one less than the principal quantum number (n-1): l=0,1,2,3,4…,(n−1).

So the answer is 1

Given the magnetic quantum number (m₁) of an electron is 0, the smallest possible value of the principal quantum number (n) under this scenario would be 1.

In quantum mechanics, the state of an electron in an atom is well defined by a set of quantum numbers: n, l, m₁, and ms. These numerical attributes express key principles regarding the electron's characteristics within the atom such as its energy and orientation.

In your question, the provided magnetic quantum number (m₁) is given as 0. The nature of the magnetic quantum number is that it ranges from -l to +l, including zero. So having m₁ = 0 implies that the lowest possible value of the angular momentum quantum number (l) should also be zero.

The principal quantum number (n), which indicates the main energy level of the electron, is always an integer greater than zero. Since l can take any value from 0 to n - 1, if l=0, the smallest possible value for n would also be 1. Therefore, the smallest possible value of the principal quantum number of the state with m₁=0 is 1.

https://brainly.com/question/27152536

#SPJ11

Answer:

razor and blade strategy

Explanation:

Razor and blade strategy -

It refers to the method of pricing , where the price of one of the item is reduced in order to increase the sale of another item , is referred to as razor and blade strategy .

It is a type of pricing tactics used by the company to indirectly earn profit for their goods and services .

Sometimes , fews goods are given free along with certain products , in order to earn profit .

Hence , from the given information of the question ,

The correct answer is razor and blade strategy .

Answer:

the entropy change for the surroundings when 1.68 moles of Fe2O3(s) react at standard conditions = 49.73 J/K.

Explanation:

3Fe2O3(s) + H2(g)-----------2Fe3O4(s) + H2O(g)

∆S°rxn = n x sum of ∆S° products - n x sum of ∆S° reactants

∆S°rxn = [2x∆S°Fe3O4(s) + ∆S°H2O(g)] - [3x∆S°Fe2O3(s) + ∆S°H2(g)]

∆S°rxn = [(2x146.44)+(188.72)] - [(3x87.40)+(130.59)] J/K

∆S°rxn = (481.6 - 392.79) J/K =88.81J/K.

For 3 moles of Fe2O3 react, ∆S° =88.81 J/K,

then for 1.68 moles Fe2O3 react, ∆S° = (1.68 mol x 88.81 J/K)/(3 mol) = 49.73 J/K the entropy change for the surroundings when 1.68 moles of Fe2O3(s) react at standard conditions.

Answer:

Option d. 2615.0g

Explanation:

Let M1, M2, and M3 represent the masses of the three different samples

M1 = 0.1568934 kg = 156.8934g

M2 = 1.215mg = 1.215x10^-3 = 0.001215g

M3 = 2458.1g

Total Mass = M1 + M2 + M3

Total Mass = 156.8934 + 0.001215 + 2458.1

Total Mass = 2614.994651g

Total Mass = 2615.0g

To find the total mass, convert all weights to the same unit (grams), then add them. The sum needs to be rounded to the correct number of significant figures. The correct answer should be 2616.0 g, which isn't provided among the options.

The total mass of the samples is found by converting all the masses to the same unit (in this case, grams) and then adding them together. The weight in kilograms is 0.1568934 kilograms or 156.8934 grams, 1.215 milligrams is equal to 0.001215 grams and 2458.1 grams remains unchanged. Adding these, we get a total mass of 2615.994615 grams. However, in science, you often report to the correct number of significant figures, in this case should be the least number of decimal places we have in our data, which is 1 decimal place. Therefore 2615.994615 grams rounded is 2616.0 grams. So none of the options provided (a-e) are correct. The correct answer should be 2616.0 g.

Learn more about Mass Calculation & Significant Figures here:

https://brainly.com/question/34660333

#SPJ3

Answer:

a) [tex]S_{AgI} = 9.11 \cdot 10^{-9} mol/L[/tex]

b) Keq = 8.3x10⁴

c) [tex] S_{[ AgI]} = 0.05 M [/tex]  

Explanation:

a) To find the molar solubility of AgI in water we need to use the solubility product constant (Ksp) of the following reaction:

AgI(s)  ⇄  Ag⁺(aq) + I⁻(aq)

[tex] K_{sp} = [Ag^{+}][I^{-}] = 8.3\cdot 10^{-17} [/tex]  

Since [Ag⁺] = [I⁻]:

[tex]K_{sp} = [Ag^{+}]^{2} \rightarrow S = \sqrt{K_{sp}} = \sqrt{8.3\cdot 10^{-17}} = 9.11 \cdot 10^{-9} mol/L[/tex]      

Hence, the molar solubility of AgI in water is 9.11x10⁻⁹ mol/L.

b) The equilibrium constant of AgI in CN, first we need to evaluate the reactions involved:

AgI(s)  ⇄  Ag⁺(aq) + I⁻(aq)   (1)

[tex] K_{sp} = [Ag^{+}][I^{-}] [/tex]   (2)

Ag⁺(aq) + 2CN⁻(aq)  ⇄  Ag(CN)₂⁻(aq)   (3)

[tex] K_{f} = \frac{[Ag(CN)_{2}^{-}]}{[Ag^{+}][CN^{-}]^{2}} [/tex]   (4)

The net equation is given by the sum of the reactions (1) and (3):

AgI(s) + 2CN⁻(aq)  ⇄  Ag(CN)₂⁻(aq) + I⁻(aq)    (5)

Hence, the equilibrium constant of the reaction (5) is:

[tex] K_{eq} = \frac{[Ag(CN)_{2}^{-}][I^{-}]}{[CN^{-}]^{2}} [/tex]   (6)

From equation (2):

[tex] [I^{-}] = \frac{K_{sp}}{[Ag^{+}]} [/tex]   (7)

By entering equations (7) and (4) into equation (6) we have:

[tex] K_{eq} = \frac{[Ag(CN)_{2}^{-}]}{[CN^{-}]^{2}}*\frac{K_{sp}}{[Ag^{+}]} [/tex]  

[tex] K_{eq} = K_{f}*K_{sp} = 1.0 \cdot 10^{21}*8.3\cdot 10^{-17} = 8.3 \cdot 10^{4} [/tex]                                      

Therefore, the equilibrium constant for the reaction (5) is 8.3x10⁴.  

c) From reaction (5):

AgI(s) + 2CN⁻(aq)  ⇄  Ag(CN)₂⁻(aq) + I⁻(aq)    

             0.1 - 2x                x                  x

[tex] K_{eq} = \frac{[Ag(CN)_{2}^{-}][I^{-}]}{[CN^{-}]^{2}} = \frac{x*x}{(0.1 - 2x)^{2}} [/tex]

[tex] x^{2} - 8.3 \cdot 10^{4}*(0.1 - 2x)^{2} = 0 [/tex]

Solving the above equation for x:

[tex] x = 0.05 mol/L = S_{[ AgI]} [/tex]

Hence, the molar solubility of AgI in a NaCN solution is 0.05 M.

I hope it helps you!

Molar solubility of AgI in pure water and in a NaCN solution can be calculated using the given values of Ksp and Kf through the described steps leading to the calculations of concentration of various ions required.

To determine the molar solubility of AgI in pure water, we need to use the solubility product constant (Ksp) for AgI. The Ksp expression for AgI is [Ag+][I-] ; when AgI dissolves, it separates into Ag+ and I- ions in a 1:1 ratio. If we represent the molar solubility as 's', then at equilibrium, the concentrations of Ag+ and I- are both 's'. So the Ksp is (s)(s)=s².

Next, for the reaction of AgI with CN-, we need to use the formation constant (Kf) for Ag(CN)2− ; this reaction can be written as Ag+ + 2CN- ⇌ Ag(CN)2-. If we denote the concentration of CN- as 'y', and we know the molar solubility of AgI is 's', then the equilibrium concentrations of Ag+ and CN- are s and y and the concentration of Ag(CN)2- is s. Therefore, the equilibrium constant for the given reaction is K=kf/Ksp which is equal to [s]/{[s][y]^2).

Finally, in a 0.100M NaCN solution, the CN- ion (from NaCN) reacts with Ag+ ion (from AgI) to form Ag(CN)2- complex, thereby decreasing the concentration of Ag+ ion which in turn increases the solubility of AgI. This increase in solubility of AgI can be calculated by the formula: Solubility=s+y=s+[NaCN]=[Ag(CN)2-].

https://brainly.com/question/34262172

#SPJ11