You wish to estimate the average weight of a mouse. You obtain 10 mice, sampled uniformly at random and with replacement from the mouse population. Their weights are 21; 23; 27; 19; 17; 18; 20; 15; 17; 22 grams respectively. (a) What is the best estimate for the average weight of a mouse, from this data

Answer:

2.4948ml

Step-by-step explanation:

First, we change the child's weight into kilograms:

[tex]22pounds=9.9790kgs[/tex]

From the info, the dose is recommended as 2.5mg/kg. Let x be the number of mg administered to the child:

[tex]1kg=2.5mg\\9.9790kg=x\\\\x=2.5\times9.9790\\\\x=24.9475mg[/tex]

#The drug contains 10mg/ml . Let y be the dose size administered, equate and solve for y:

[tex]10mg=1ml\\24.9475mg=y\\\\\thereforey= \frac{1ml\times24.9475mg}{10mg}\\\\y=2.4948[/tex]

Hence, the dose required is 2.4948ml

Answer:

2.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The distribution with n = 225 will give a smaller standard error.

Since sigma x = sigma/√n, dividing by the square root of 225 will result in a small standard error regardless of the value of sigma.

Step-by-step explanation:

Standard error is given by standard deviation (sigma) divided by square root of sample size (√n).

The distribution with n = 225 would give a smaller standard error because the square root of 225 is 15. The inverse of 15 multiplied by sigma is approximately 0.07sigma which is smaller compared to the distribution n = 100. Square of 100 is 10, inverse of 10 multiplied by sigma is 0.1sigma.

0.07sigma is smaller than 0.1sigma

Answer:

Mean 71

Standard deviation 3

Step-by-step explanation:

We use the Central Limit Theorem to solve this question.

The Central Limit Theorem estabilishes that, for a random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution with a large sample size can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

In this problem, we have that:

[tex]\mu = 71, \sigma = 24, n = 64[/tex]. So

Mean 71

Standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{24}{\sqrt{64}} = 3[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]\text{Average diameter is 1.65 mm and we decide that it is not 1.65 mm.}[/tex]                

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the following in the question:

The needle size should not be too big and too small.

The diameter of the needle should be 1.65 mm.

We design the null and the alternate hypothesis

[tex]H_{0}: \mu = 1.65\text{ mm}\\H_A: \mu \neq 1.65\text{ mm}[/tex]

Sample size, n = 35

Sample mean, [tex]\bar{x}[/tex] = 1.64 mm

Sample standard deviation, s = 0.07 mm

Type I error:

Thus, type I error in this study would mean we reject the null hypothesis that the average diameter is 1.65 mm but actually the average diameters of the needle is 1.65 mm.

Thus, average diameter is 1.65 mm and we decide that it is not 1.65 mm.

Answer:

Type I error will be Rejecting the null hypothesis that the average diameter of needles is 1.65 mm and assume that the average diameter of needles is different from 1.65 mm but the fact is that the null hypothesis was true that the average diameter of needles is 1.65 mm.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a manufacturing process is producing hypodermic needles that will be used for blood donations. These needles need to have a diameter of 1.65 mm—too big and they would hurt the donor (even more than usual), too small and they would rupture the red blood cells, rendering the donated blood useless.

So, Null Hypothesis, [tex]H_0[/tex] : [tex]\mu[/tex] = 1.65 mm

Alternate Hypothesis, [tex]H_1[/tex] : [tex]\mu\neq[/tex] 1.65 mm  

Also, the most recent random sample of 35 needles have an average diameter of 1.64 mm and a standard deviation of 0.07 mm.

Now, Type I error Type I error states that : Probability of rejecting null hypothesis given the fact that null hypothesis was true. It is the the probability of rejecting a true hypothesis.

So, in our question Type I error will be Rejecting the null hypothesis that the average diameter of needles is 1.65 mm and assume that the average diameter of needles is different from 1.65 mm but the fact is that the null hypothesis was true that the average diameter of needles is 1.65 mm.

Answer:

Therefore, we conclude that 2/15  of the team work part-time.

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that a softball team is composed of 15 employees of a furniture store of whom 2 work part-time. We calculate what proportion of the team work part-time.

So, we will divide the number of those people who work part-time, by the number of people employed in  a softball team. We get:

x=2/15

Therefore, we conclude that 2/15  of the team work part-time.

Answer:

a) The minimum head breadth that will fit the clientele = 4.105 inches to 3d.p = 4.1 inches to 1 d.p

b) The maximum head breadth that will fit the clientele = 8.905 inches to 3 d.p = 8.9 inches to 1 d.p

Step-by-step explanation:

This is normal distribution problem.

A normal distribution has all the data points symmetrically distributed around the mean in a bell shape.

For this question, mean = xbar = 6.1 inches

Standard deviation = σ = 1 inch

And we want to find the lowermost 2.3% and uppermost 2.3% of the data distribution.

The minimum head breadth that will fit the clientele has a z-score with probability of 2.3% = 0.023

Let that z-score be z'

That is, P(z ≤ z') = 0.023

Using the table to obtain the value of z'

z' = - 1.995

P(z ≤ - 1.995) = 0.023

But z-score is for any value, x, is that value minus the mean then divided by the standard deviation.

z' = (x - xbar)/σ

- 1.995 = (x - 6.1)/1

x = -1.995 + 6.1 = 4.105 inches

The maximum head breadth that will fit the clientele has a z-score with probability of 2.3% also = 0.023

Let that z-score be z''

That is, P(z ≥ z'') = 0.023

Using the table to obtain the value of z''

P(z ≥ z") = P(z ≤ -z")

- z'' = - 1.995

z" = 1.995

P(z ≥ 1.995) = 0.023

But z-score is for any value, x, is that value minus the mean then divided by the standard deviation.

z'' = (x - xbar)/σ

1.995 = (x - 6.1)/1

x = 1.995 + 6.1 = 8.905 inches

Using z-scores for the smallest and largest 2.3% of the normal distribution, and a formula that accounts for the mean and standard deviation of head breadths, we can calculate that the helmets need to accommodate head breadths between 4.1 inches (minimum) and 8.1 inches (maximum).

To determine the minimum and maximum head breadths that will fit the clientele, we need to find the z-scores that correspond to the smallest 2.3% and the largest 2.3% of the normal distribution. Then we can use these z-scores to calculate the specific head breadths.

First, we find the z-scores using a standard z-table or a calculator since the normal distribution table typically provides the area to the left of a z-score. For the smallest 2.3%, we need the z-score that has 0.023 to its left. This value is approximately z = -2. Conversely, for the largest 2.3%, since the normal distribution is symmetric, the z-score will have the same absolute value but be positive, which would be z = 2. However, to be precise, one should use statistical tables or software to find the exact z-scores close to these values.

To convert the z-scores to specific head breadths, we use the formula:

X = μ + (z * σ)

where X is the head breadth, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.

The minimum head breadth (Xmin) is calculated as follows:

The maximum head breadth (Xmax) is calculated as follows:

Therefore, the minimum head breadth that will fit the clientele is 4.1 inches, and the maximum head breadth is 8.1 inches.

The right format of the number is (45^8)(88^5).

Answer:

There are 8 zeros

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the unique factorization of integers theorem, we can break any integer down into the product of prime integers.

So breaking it down we have;

(45^8) = (3 x 3 x 5)^(8)

(88^5) = (2 x 2 x 2 x 11)^(5)

Now, if we put it back together as separate factors, we'll get;

(3^(16)) x (5^(8) ) x (2^(15)) x (11^(5))

Now let's find the number of zeroes by figuring out how many factors of 10 (which equals 2 x 5) we can make. Thus, we can make 8 factors of 10 so it looks like;

(3^(16)) x (2^(7)) x (11^(5)) x (10^(8))

Thus, we can see that there will be 8 zeros as the end is (10^(8))

The number of trailing zeros in the product of 457 and 885 is determined by the factors of 10 (2 and 5) in these numbers. In this specific case, there are no trailing zeros. This also applies in scientific notation - the number of significant figures after the decimal in scientific notation indicates the quantity of zeros at the end of the number.

To determine the number of zeroes at the end of the number 457 · 885, consider the factors in the product. Each zero at the end of a number results from a factor of 10, which contains a factor of 2 and a factor of 5. Looking at the numbers 457 and 885, we notice that neither has a factor of 5, therefore there are no trailing zeroes in the product of 457 and 885.

This approach also applies to the scientific notation. The number of significant figures after the decimal in the scientific notation of a number corresponds to the quantity of zeros at the end of it. In such cases, leading zeros are not significant and only serve as placeholders to locate the decimal point. For instance, in the case of the number 1.300 × 10³, the scientific notation shows that there are three significant figures after the decimal and therefore, three zeros at the end of the number.

Overall, understanding how to find the number of trailing zeroes in a product, such as 457 · 885, without actual computation involves a knowledge of the factors of the numbers being multiplied and the principles of significant figures in scientific notation.

https://brainly.com/question/31609866

#SPJ3

Answer:

[tex]-\frac{1}{2} (-\frac{3}{2} x+6x+1)-3x[/tex] [tex]=-\frac{21x}{4} -\frac{1}{2}[/tex] [tex]=-\frac{1}{2}(\frac{21x}{2} +1)[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given,

[tex]-\frac{1}{2} (-\frac{3}{2} x+6x+1)-3x[/tex]

Applying distribution law

[tex]=(-\frac{1}{2}) (-\frac{3}{2} x)+(-\frac{1}{2}).6x+(-\frac{1}{2}).1-3x[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{3}{4} x-3x-\frac{1}{2}-3x[/tex]

Combine like terms

[tex]=\frac{3}{4} x-3x-3x-\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Adding like terms

[tex]=\frac{3x-12x-12x}{4} -\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

[tex]=-\frac{21x}{4} -\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

[tex]=-\frac{1}{2}(\frac{21x}{2} +1)[/tex]

Answer:

(1) The probability of the event X = 2 is 0.0413.

(2) The probability of the event X ≤ 1 is 0.009.

(3) The probability of the event X < 6 is 0.6846.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the random variable X follow a Binomial distribution with parameter n = 8 and p = 0.60.

The probability mass function of the Binomial distribution is:

[tex]P(X=x)={n\choose x}p^{x}(1-p)^{n-x};\ x=0, 1, 2,...[/tex]

(1)

Compute the probability of the event X = 2 as follows:

[tex]P(X=2)={8\choose 2}(0.60)^{2}(1-0.60)^{8-2}\\=\frac{8!}{2!(8-2)!}\times (0.60)^{2}\times(0.40)^{6}\\=28\times0.36\times0.004096\\=0.0413[/tex]

Thus, the probability of the event X = 2 is 0.0413.

(2)

Compute the probability of the event X ≤ 1 as follows:

P (X ≤ 1) = P (X = 0) + P (X = 1)

[tex]={8\choose 0}(0.60)^{0}(1-0.60)^{8-0}+{8\choose 1}(0.60)^{1}(1-0.60)^{8-1}\\=\frac{8!}{0!(8-0)!}\times (0.60)^{0}\times(0.40)^{8}+\frac{8!}{1!(8-1)!}\times (0.60)^{1}\times(0.40)^{7}\\=(1\times1\times0.00066)+(8\times0.60\times0.00164)\\=0.008532\approx0.009[/tex]

Thus, the probability of the event X ≤ 1 is 0.009.

(3)

Compute the probability of the event X < 6 as follows:

P (X < 6) = 1 - P (X ≥ 6)

              = 1 - P (X = 6) - P (X = 7) - P (X = 8)

    [tex]=1-{8\choose 6}(0.60)^{6}(1-0.60)^{8-6}+{8\choose 7}(0.60)^{7}(1-0.60)^{8-7}+{8\choose 8}(0.60)^{8}(1-0.60)^{8-8}\\=1-\frac{8!}{6!(8-6)!}\times (0.60)^{6}\times(0.40)^{2}+\frac{8!}{7!(8-7)!}\times (0.60)^{7}\times(0.40)^{1}\\+\frac{8!}{8!(8-8)!}\times (0.60)^{8}\times(0.40)^{0}\\=1-0.2090-0.0896-0.0168\\=0.6846[/tex]

Thus, the probability of the event X < 6 is 0.6846.

The probabilities for a binomial distribution with p=0.6 and n=8 for different scenarios such as P(x=2), P(x≤1), and P(x>6), which involves combinations and powers of success and failure probabilities is equal to 0.2799, 0.0888, and 0.0332 respectively.

1) Upper P(x = 2):

To find P(x = 2), we can use the formula for the binomial probability:

P(x = 2) = (8 choose 2) × (0.6)² × (0.4)⁶= 0.2799

2) Upper P(x ≤ 1):

P(x ≤ 1) = P(x = 0) + P(x = 1) = (8 choose 0)×  (0.6)⁰ ×(0.4)⁸ + (8 choose 1) ×(0.6)¹ ×(0.4)⁷ = 0.0888

3) Upper P(x > 6):

P(x > 6) = 1 - P(x ≤ 6) = 1 - (P(x = 0) + P(x = 1) + ... + P(x = 6)) = 1 - 0.9668 = 0.0332

Answer:

86.46% probability that at least 2 crashes occur in the next month.

Step-by-step explanation:

For each TIE ghter ights, there are only two possible outcomes. Either it crashes, or it does not. The probability of a TIE ghter ights crashing is independent from other TIE ghter ights. So we use the binomial probability distribution to solve this question.

Binomial probability distribution

The binomial probability is the probability of exactly x successes on n repeated trials, and X can only have two outcomes.

[tex]P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]

In which [tex]C_{n,x}[/tex] is the number of different combinations of x objects from a set of n elements, given by the following formula.

[tex]C_{n,x} = \frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!}[/tex]

And p is the probability of X happening.

Every month, there are 1000 independent TIE ghter ights, and each TIE ghter ight crashes with a probability of 0.0035.

This means that [tex]n = 1000, p = 0.0035[/tex]

(a) What is the probability that at least 2 crashes occur in the next month?

Either less than 2 crashes occur, or at least 2 do. The sum of the probabilities of these events is decimal 1. So

[tex]P(X < 2) + P(X \geq 2) = 1[/tex]

We want [tex]P(X \geq 2)[/tex]

So

[tex]P(X \geq 2) = 1 - P(X < 2)[/tex]

In which

[tex]P(X < 2) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1)[/tex]

[tex]P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 0) = C_{1000,0}.(0.0035)^{0}.(0.9965)^{1000} = 0.0300[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 1) = C_{1000,1}.(0.0035)^{1}.(0.9965)^{999} = 0.1054[/tex]

[tex]P(X < 2) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) = 0.0300 + 0.1054 = 0.1354[/tex]

[tex]P(X \geq 2) = 1 - P(X < 2) = 1 - 0.1354 = 0.8646[/tex]

86.46% probability that at least 2 crashes occur in the next month.

Complete Question

The complete question is shown on the first uploaded image

Answer:

The cognitive percentile for someone who has played for 7 years is 78.62

The cognitive percentile for someone who has played for 16 years is 48.56

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question the regression line for predicting percentile from years is given as

                 percentile = [tex]102 - 3.34 \ Years[/tex]

For someone who has played for 7 years his cognitive percentile would be

           [tex]Percentile = 102 - 3.34(7)[/tex]

                             [tex]=78.62[/tex]

For someone who has played for 16 years his cognitive percentile would

be   [tex]Percentile = 102 - 3.34(16)[/tex]

                        [tex]=48.56[/tex]

Final answer:

The predicted cognitive percentile for someone who has played football for 7 years is 78.62, while for someone who has played for 16 years, it is 48.56, using the regression equation Percentile = 102 - 3.34 Years.

Explanation:

To predict the cognitive percentile for a football player who has played for 7 years, we use the given regression equation Percentile = 102 - 3.34 Years. By plugging 7 into the equation for Years, we get:

Percentile = 102 - 3.34 × 7

Percentile = 102 - 23.38

Percentile = 78.62

So, for someone who has played football for 7 years, the predicted cognitive percentile would be 78.62.

Similarly, for someone who has played football for 16 years:

Percentile = 102 - 3.34 × 16

Percentile = 102 - 53.44

Percentile = 48.56

Therefore, the predicted cognitive percentile for someone who has played for 16 years is 48.56.

The function that determines the rock's height above the road in terms of the number of seconds since it was thrown is f(t) = -16t² + 24.32t + 57. This quadratic function accounts for the initial upward velocity and the constant downward acceleration due to gravity.

To determine the rock's height above the road as a function of time after it was thrown, we can use the standard equation of motion under constant acceleration due to gravity, which in this case is downward. The formula for the height f(t) of the rock at time t seconds after it is thrown is:

f(t) = -16t² + vt + s

where:

Since the rock reaches its maximum height 0.76 seconds after it is thrown, the initial velocity v can be calculated using the fact that the velocity at the peak height is 0 (the rock stops moving upward for an instant before descending).

At maximum height, the velocity v had decreased by 32 feet/second for 0.76 seconds, which is v - 32(0.76) = 0. Solving for v, we find that v = 32(0.76).

The rock contacts the road 3.15 seconds after it was thrown, meaning it falls 57 feet in that time. Plugging these values into the formula:

f(t) = -16t² + 32(0.76)t + 57

which simplifies to:

f(t) = -16t² + 24.32t + 57

This function f(t) gives the rock's height in feet above the road at any time t measured in seconds since it was thrown, assuming negligible air resistance.

The correct function for the rock's height above the road in terms of the number of seconds [tex]\( t \)[/tex] since the rock was thrown is: [tex]\[ f(t) = -16t^2 + v_0t + 57 \][/tex] where [tex]\( v_0 \)[/tex] is the initial velocity of the rock in feet per second.

To derive this function, we use the kinematic equation for the vertical motion of an object under constant acceleration due to gravity, which is:

[tex]\[ h(t) = h_0 + v_0t - \frac{1}{2}gt^2 \][/tex]

Given that the bridge is 57 feet above the road, [tex]\( h_0 = 57 \)[/tex] feet. The acceleration due to gravity is [tex]\( g = 32 \)[/tex] feet per second squared. Plugging these values into the kinematic equation, we get:

[tex]\[ h(t) = 57 + v_0t - \frac{1}{2}(32)t^2 \][/tex]

Simplifying the equation by multiplying [tex]\( \frac{1}{2} \)[/tex] with 32 gives us:

[tex]\[ h(t) = 57 + v_0t - 16t^2 \][/tex]

This simplifies to the function [tex]\( f(t) \)[/tex] as provided above. Note that [tex]\( v_0 \)[/tex] is still unknown and will need to be determined using additional information given in the problem, such as the time it takes for the rock to reach its maximum height.

To find [tex]\( v_0 \)[/tex], we can use the fact that at the maximum height, the velocity of the rock is zero. The kinematic equation relating velocity and time under constant acceleration is:

[tex]\[ v(t) = v_0 - gt \][/tex]

Setting [tex]\( v(t) = 0 \)[/tex] at the maximum height and solving for [tex]\( v_0 \)[/tex] gives us:

[tex]\[ 0 = v_0 - gt_{\text{max}} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ v_0 = gt_{\text{max}} \][/tex]

Given that the rock reaches its maximum height 0.76 seconds after it is thrown, [tex]\( t_{\text{max}} = 0.76 \)[/tex] seconds. Plugging this into the equation for [tex]\( v_0 \)[/tex], we get:

[tex]\[ v_0 = 32 \times 0.76 \][/tex]

[tex]\[ v_0 = 24.32 \][/tex]

Now we can write the complete function with the known values:

[tex]\[ f(t) = -16t^2 + 24.32t + 57 \][/tex]

This function represents the height of the rock above the road as a function of time since it was thrown.

Answer:

5278.0

21112

2927

Step-by-step explanation:

P = Po[2^(t/5)]

8000 = Po(2^⅗)

Po = 5278.0

P = 5278(2^(10/5))

P = 21112

P = Po[2^(t/5)]

ln(P/Po) = (t/5)ln2

ln(P) - ln(Po) = (t/5)ln2

1/P . dP/dt = ln2/5

dP/dt = P(ln2)/5

At t = 10, P = 21112

dP/dt = 2927

Answer:

(a) 3.432

(b) 3.175

Step-by-step explanation:

The given data and corresponding weights is:

                                                  [tex]\begin{array}{cc}x_i&w_i\\3.2&6\\3.0&3\\2.5&2\\4.0&8\\\end{array}[/tex]

(a) The weighted mean is determined by the following expression:

[tex]M_W=\sum\frac{x_i*w_i}{w_i}\\M_W=\frac{3.2*6+3.0*3+2.5*2+4.0*8}{6+3+2+8}\\M_W=3.432[/tex]

(b) The simple mean of the given data is determined by adding up the four values dividing the result by 4:

[tex]M_S = \frac{3.2+3.0+2.5+4.0}{4}\\ M_S=3.175[/tex]

The value is lower than the weighted mean.

The weighted mean is 3.455, while the sample mean without weighting is 3.175.

To compute the weighted mean, we multiply each data value by its corresponding weight, then add up the results. We then divide this sum by the sum of the weights. In this case, the weighted mean can be calculated as follows:

Weighted Mean = (3.2 * 6 + 3.0 * 3 + 2.5 * 2 + 4.0 * 8) / (6 + 3 + 2 + 8) = 3.455

To compute the sample mean without weighting, we simply add up all the data values and divide the sum by the number of data values. In this case, the sample mean can be calculated as follows:

Sample Mean = (3.2 + 3.0 + 2.5 + 4.0) / 4 = 3.175

The difference between the two computations is that the weighted mean takes into account the importance of each data value by assigning weights to them, whereas the sample mean without weighting treats all data values equally.

https://brainly.com/question/35447441

#SPJ3

Answer: the population in 5 years is

187600

Step-by-step explanation:

The value of a house is increasing by 1900 per year. This means that it is increasing in an arithmetic progression. The formula for determining the nth term of an arithmetic sequence is expressed as

Tn = a + d(n - 1)

Where

a represents the first term of the sequence.

d represents the common difference.

n represents the number of terms in the sequence.

From the information given,

a = 180000

d = 1900

n = 5

We want to determine the value of the 5th term, T5. Therefore,

T5 = 180000 + 1900(5 - 1)

T5 = 180000 + 7600

T5 = 187600

Answer:

c) NORM.INV(R, 1200, 350)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that the daily demand for gasoline at a local gas station is normally distributed with a mean of 1200 gallons, and a standard deviation of 350 gallons.

X = demand for gasolene at a local gas station is N(1200, 350)

R is any random number between 0 and 1.

Daily demand for gasolene would be

X = Mean + std deviation * z value, where Z = normal inverse of a value between 0 and 1.

The norm inv (R, 1200, 350) for R between 0 and 1 gives all the values of X

Hence correct choice would be

Option c) NORM.INV(R, 1200, 350)

The answers to mentioned questions are conditional probabilities and proportions, requiring more detailed numerical data to provide exact values. But they can be calculated using simple formulas of probability and proportion.

This is a statistics problem and we would need more details to fully answer these questions. But here are some general insights:

Without explicit numbers provided for each category of writer, it's impossible to give numerical solutions to these problems. Instead, we can only provide the formulas to solve them. The same reasoning applies to all subsequent questions.

https://brainly.com/question/32117953

#SPJ2

Average number of books published in the last five years  = 1.1 books

Proportion of sci-fi writers who published 2 books =  0.2

Probability that a romantic novel writer had not published in the last five years =  0.04

Probability a writer who did not publish romantic or sci-fi did not publish exactly 1 book = 0.3

Probability a writer who published in the last years writes romantic novels = 0.2

Probability that 5 writers didn't publish any books = .00243.

Probability that a non-romantic writer published more than 1 book= 0.32

Independence of book types and number published= independent events

Independence of writing sci-fi and not publishing = independent events.

Probability 2 of 4 have published romantic novels= 0.1536

Proportion of writers did not write sci-fi and published 1 or 2 books=0.42

Let's breakdown this complex problem step-by-step.

1. Average number of books published in the last five years

Given that 40% published 2 books and 30% published 1 book, we can find the average as follows:

Average = (0.4 * 2) + (0.3 * 1) + (0.3 * 0) = 0.8 + 0.3 + 0 = 1.1 books

2. Proportion of sci-fi writers who published 2 books

Since the number of sci-fi writers publishing 1 and 2 books is the same, and sci-fi comprises 40% of all writers:

Proportion = 0.4 * 0.5 = 0.2 or 20%

3. Probability that a romantic novel writer had not published in the last five years

20% of total writers wrote romantic novels, and 20% of those did not publish in the last five years:

Probability = 0.2 * 0.2 = 0.04 or 4%

4. Probability a writer who did not publish romantic or sci-fi did not publish exactly 1 book

If 60% did not publish romantic or sci-fi, half of these published 2 books:

Probability = 0.6 * 0.5 = 0.3 or 30%

5. Probability a writer who published in the last years writes romantic novels

40% published 2 books and 30% published 1 book, so 70% published. Romantic novelists comprise 20% of all writers:

Probability = (0.2 * 0.7) / 0.7 = 0.2 or 20%

6. Probability that 5 writers didn't publish any books

The probability that one writer didn't publish is 0.3:

Probability = 0.3^5 = 0.00243 or 0.243%

7. Probability that a non-romantic writer published more than 1 book

80% are non-romantic, and 40% of total published 2 books:

Probability = (0.4 * 0.8) = 0.32 or 32%

8. Independence of book types and number published

We need to see if P(A ∩ B) = P(A)*P(B). Since specific data does not align well, these events are not independent.

9. Independence of writing sci-fi and not publishing

40% wrote sci-fi and 30% did not publish:

P(A ∩ B) = 0.4 * 0.3 = 0.12 or 12%

These are independent events.

10. Probability 2 of 4 have published romantic novels

Using binomial distribution:

Probability P(X = 2) = 4C2 * (0.2)^2 * (0.8)^2 = 0.1536 or 15.36%

11. Proportion of writers did not write sci-fi and published 1 or 2 books

60% did not write sci-fi, and of those published, 70% published 1 or 2 books:

Proportion = 0.6 * 0.7 = 0.42 or 42%

The phrases you would like to be written as expressions are not listed. I would nevertheless, explain how to write phrases as expressions so that the same approach could be applied to you own question.

Phrases are dynamic, depending on the problem. They do not necessarily take a particular form.

The constant thing about phrases is the operators connecting the words in the phrases. Theses operators are:

Addition (+), Subtraction (-), Division (÷), and Multiplication (×).

In word problems, it is a matter of interpretation, these operators can be written in many ways.

ADDITION

plus

the sum of

increase

grow

add

profit

And so on.

SUBTRACTION

minus

loss

decrease

reduce

subtract

And so on

MULTIPLICATION

times

multiply

triple

And so on

DIVISION

split

share

divide

distribute

And so on.

Examples

(1) 56 is added to a number to give 100

Interpretation: x + 56 = 100

(2)The difference between Mr. A and Mr. B is 5

Interpretation: A - B = 5

(3) This load (L1) is three times heavier than that one (L2)

Interpretation: L1 = 3L2

(4) Share this orange (P) equally between the three children

Interpretation: P/3

To write expressions using the numbers 54 and 67 with operations, you can add (54 + 67), subtract (54 - 67), multiply (54 x 67), or divide (54 ÷ 67). The order of operations is important and parentheses may be used to dictate the sequence of calculations. Practice with expressions can be enhanced by working through problems symbolically and then substituting numbers.

The question asks to write expressions using the numbers 54 and 67 with operations. When creating expressions, operations such as addition (+), subtraction (-), multiplication (x or ×), and division (÷) are typically used. For example, if we want to add 54 and 67, the expression would be 54 + 67.

If we wanted to multiply them, the expression would be 54 x 67 (or 54 × 67). Remember that in writing expressions, the order of operations is important, so if we want to perform different operations, we may need to use parentheses to ensure the correct sequence of calculations.

For more practice with expressions and operations, you can approach problems by covering up one number and solving for it using the remaining information (as mentioned in the given examples). This technique helps you solve various types of problems using the same principle. Moreover, when working with algebraic expressions, it's beneficial to solve the equation symbolically first and then substitute the numbers.

Substituting numbers and parentheses placement can significantly alter the result of the expression, as shown in the examples given in the question. The expressions created through experimentation, such as (74) to the third power, can be solved symbolically or using a calculator to understand how different operations and powers affect the result.

Answer:

254.34 in^3

Step-by-step explanation:

Volume of a cylinder is V=pi*r^2*h

Since r=6/2=3, and h=3r=3*3=9, then we solve for V:

V=3.14*3^2*9

V=3.14*9*9

V=3.14*81

V=254.34

So the volume of the cylinder is 254.34 in^3

Answer: volume = 254.3 inches³

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula for determining the volume of a cylinder is expressed as

Volume = πr²h

Where

r represents the radius of the cylinder.

h represents the height of the cylinder.

π is a constant whose value is 3.14

From the information given,

Diameter = 6 inches

Radius = diameter/2 = 6/2 = 3 inches

Height = 3 × radius = 3 × 3 = 9 inches

Therefore,

Volume = 3.14 × 3² × 9

Volume = 254.3 inches³ to the nearest tenth

a) 21 sample points

b) Sum 2: (1, 1)

- Sum 3: (1, 2)

- Sum 4: (1, 3), (2, 2)

- Sum 5: (1, 4), (2, 3)

- Sum 6: (1, 5), (2, 4), (3, 3)

- Sum 7: (1, 6), (2, 5), (3, 4)

- Sum 8: (2, 6), (3, 5), (4, 4)

- Sum 9: (3, 6), (4, 5)

- Sum 10: (4, 6), (5, 5)

- Sum 11: (5, 6)

- Sum 12: (6, 6)

c) Probability of obtaining sum of 5 is 2/21

d) Probability of obtaining 8 or greater is 3/7

e) Probability of even is higher that the probability of odd, so even sum are expect to have more appear.

f) classic method

What is probability?

(a) There are 21 possible sample points when rolling a pair of dice.

(b) Here are the sample points for each sum:

- Sum 2: (1, 1)

- Sum 3: (1, 2)

- Sum 4: (1, 3), (2, 2)

- Sum 5: (1, 4), (2, 3)

- Sum 6: (1, 5), (2, 4), (3, 3)

- Sum 7: (1, 6), (2, 5), (3, 4)

- Sum 8: (2, 6), (3, 5), (4, 4)

- Sum 9: (3, 6), (4, 5)

- Sum 10: (4, 6), (5, 5)

- Sum 11: (5, 6)

- Sum 12: (6, 6)

(c) The probability of obtaining a sum of 5 is

: (1, 4), (2, 3)

P(sum of 5) = no of sum of 5 /total number of our

= 2/21

(d) The probability of obtaining a sum of 8 or greater is (2, 6), (3, 5), (4, 4) (3, 6), (4, 5) (4, 6), (5, 5),(5, 6) (6, 6)

P(sum of 8 or greater) = no of sum of 8 and above

P(sum => 8) = 9/21 = 3/7

(e) Yes!

Out of 21 sample points 12 are even while 9 are odd.

P(even) = 12/21 = 4/7

P(odd) = 1 - 4/7 = 3/7

Probability of even is higher that the probability of odd, so even sum are expect to have more appear.

(f) We used the classical method, which involves counting the number of favorable outcomes and dividing by the total number of possible outcomes.

Answer:

Probability that the weight of a randomly selected steer is between 939 and 1417 lbs is 0.68389 .

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that the weights of steers in a herd are distributed normally. The standard deviation is 200 lbs and the mean steer weight is 1300 lbs.

So, Let X = weights of steers in a herd ,i.e.; X ~ N([tex]\mu,\sigma^{2}[/tex])

Here, [tex]\mu[/tex] = population mean = 1300 lbs

         [tex]\sigma[/tex] = population standard deviation = 200 lbs

The z score area distribution is given by;

            Z = [tex]\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex] ~ N(0,1)

So, Probability that the weight of a randomly selected steer is between 939 and 1417 lbs = P(939 lbs < X < 1417 lbs)

P(939 lbs < X < 1417 lbs) = P(X < 1417) - P(X <= 939)

P(X < 1417) = P( [tex]\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex] < [tex]\frac{1417-1300}{200}[/tex] ) = P(Z < 0.58) = 0.71904

P(X <= 939) = P( [tex]\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex] <= [tex]\frac{939-1300}{200}[/tex] ) = P(Z <= -1.81) = 1 - P(Z < 1.81)

                                                       = 1 - 0.96485 = 0.03515

Therefore,  P(939 lbs < X < 1417 lbs) = 0.71904 - 0.03515 = 0.68389 .

(a) Rewrite y(t) = 4sin(2πt) + 15cos(2πt) using a sine term only: y(t) = √241sin(2πt - 1.249)

(b) Amplitude:  √241, Period: 0.5s, Frequency: 2Hz.

(c) Graph shows two sine waves, one with amplitude √241 and another with 15, out of phase, repeating every 0.5s.

(a) Expressing the function in terms of a sine term only:

To express the function y(t) = 4sin(2πt) + 15cos(2πt) in terms of a sine term only, we can use trigonometric identities to rewrite the cosine term in terms of sine:

cos(2πt) = sin(π/2 - 2πt)

Now, we can rewrite the function as follows:

y(t) = 4sin(2πt) + 15sin(π/2 - 2πt)

(b) Determining the amplitude, period, and frequency:

Amplitude (A): The amplitude of a sinusoidal function is the coefficient of the sine term. In this case, the amplitude is 4.

Period (T): The period of a sinusoidal function is the time it takes for one complete cycle. The period can be found using the formula T = 1/f, where f is the frequency. In this case, the frequency is 2, as we'll see in part (b). So, T = 1/2 = 0.5 seconds.

Frequency (f): The frequency of a sinusoidal function is the number of cycles per second (in hertz, Hz). In this case, the frequency is 2 Hz.

(c) Drawing the function in the time domain:

To draw the function y(t) = 4sin(2πt) + 15sin(π/2 - 2πt), you can follow these steps:

1. Create a set of axes with time (t) on the horizontal axis and y(t) on the vertical axis.

2. The amplitude of the first sine term is 4, so the first term oscillates between -4 and 4.

3. The second sine term has an amplitude of 15, but it is shifted in phase by π/2. This means it starts at its maximum value of 15 and goes down to -15.

4. The total function y(t) is the sum of these two sine terms. You'll see a combination of two sinusoidal waves, one with a smaller amplitude (4) and one with a larger amplitude (15), and they are out of phase with each other.

The period of the function is 0.5 seconds (as calculated in part (b)), so you'll see this pattern repeat every 0.5 seconds.

To learn more about Amplitude here

https://brainly.com/question/35665970

#SPJ3

Answer:

a) B(t)= 64.8e^(-0.01255t), k=-0.0125 b) 56.5 c)2150

Step-by-step explanation:

a) B(t)= Ae^(-kt)

at t=0, B(t)=64.8

A=64.8

at t=6, B(t)=60.1

60.1=64.8e^(-6k)

k=0.0125

b) B(t)=64.8e^(-0.0125×11)

B(t)= 56.5

c) 10=64.8e^(-0.0125t)

0.15432=e^(-0.0125t)

-0.0125t=ln(0.15432)

-0.0125t=-1.869

t=149.5 or 150

Year= 2150

a)k ≈ 0.01267 and the equation is [tex]B(t) = 64.8e^{-0.01267t[/tex]

b)B(11) ≈ 56.38 lb

c) t ≈ 143.86

A beef consumption model follows exponential decay where B(t), the annual beef consumption t years after 2000,

can be modeled by the equation: [tex]B(t) = B_0e^{-kt}.[/tex]

Given that [tex]B_0[/tex] = 64.8 lb in 2000 and B(6) = 60.1 lb in 2006,

we first need to find the decay constant k.

a) Find the value of k, and write the equation:

We use the given data points to solve for k.

[tex]B(6) = 64.8e^{-6k} = 60.1[/tex]

[tex]e^{-6k} = 60.1 / 64.8[/tex]
[tex]e^{-6k}[/tex] ≈ 0.9272
Taking the natural log of both sides:
-6k = ln(0.9272)
k ≈ -ln(0.9272) / 6
k ≈ 0.01267

Therefore, the equation for B(t) is:

[tex]B(t) = 64.8e^{-0.01267t[/tex]

b) Estimate the consumption of beef in 2011:

For t = 11 (since 2011 is 11 years after 2000):

[tex]B(11) = 64.8e^{-0.01267 * 11[/tex]
B(11) ≈ 64.8[tex]e^{-0.13937[/tex]
B(11) ≈ [tex]64.8 * 0.8699[/tex]
B(11) ≈ 56.38 lb

c) In what year (theoretically) will the consumption of beef be 10 lb?

We need to solve for t when B(t) = 10 lb:

[tex]10 = 64.8e^{-0.01267t[/tex]
[tex]e^{-0.01267t} = 10 / 64.8[/tex]
[tex]e^{-0.01267t[/tex] ≈ 0.1543
Taking the natural log of both sides:
-0.01267t = ln(0.1543)
t ≈ -ln(0.1543) / 0.01267
t ≈ 143.86

Thus, the theoretical year is approximately 2000 + 144 = 2144.

Answer:

a.) 0.0402

b.) 0.00789

Step-by-step explanation:

In between the numbers 1 and 1012,

The number of perfect squares we have is 31, that is all numbers between 1 and 31 inclusive have their squares between the numbers 1 and 1012

The number of perfect cubes we have is 10, that is all numbers between 1 and 10 Inclusive have their perfect cube between the numbers 1 and 1012.

The number of perfect Fourth we have is 5, that is all numbers between 1 and 5 inclusive have their perfect fourth between the numbers 1 and 1012.

The number of perfect Sixth we have is 3, that is all numbers between 1 and 3 inclusive have their perfect sixth between the numbers 1 and 1012.

Hence,

a.) probability of choosing a perfect square = 31/1012

Probability of choosing a perfect cube = 10/1012

Probability of choosing a perfect square or a perfect cube = (31/1012) + (10/1012) - [(31/1012)*(10/1012)]

=41/1012 - 310/1024144

=0.0405 - 0.0003

=0.0402.

b.) Probability of choosing a perfect fourth or a perfect Sixth = (5/1012) + (3/1012) - [(5/1012)*(3/1012)]

= 8/1012 - 15/1024144

= 0.00789.

Answer:

The answer to the question is

It would take about 167.021 s  to splash down in the arctic ocean.

Step-by-step explanation:

The gravitational force is given by

[tex]F_G = \frac{G*m_1*m_2}{r^2}[/tex]

Where m₁ mass of the piano and

m₂ = mass of the Earth

r = 3·R where R = radius of the earth

as stated in the question we have varying acceleration due to the inverse square law

Therefore at 3 × Radius of the earth we have

[tex]F_G[/tex] = 109.083 N and the acceleration =1.09083 m/s²

If the body falls from 3·R to 2·R with that acceleration we have

S = u·t +0.5×a·t²  = 0.5×a·t² as u = 0

That is 6371 km = 0.5·1.09083·t²

t₁ = 108.079 s and we have

v₁² = u₁² +2·a₁·s₁ =  2·a₁·s₁ = 117.895 m/s

For the next stage r₂ = 2R

Therefore F = 245.436 N and a₂ = F/m₁ = 2.45436 m/s²

Therefore the time from 2R to R is given by

S₂ =R=u·t+0.5·a₂·t² = v₁·t + 0.5·a₂·t²

or 6371 km = 117.895 m/s × t + 0.5 × 2.45436 × t²

Which gives 1.22718 × t² + 117.895 × t -6371  = 0

Factorizing we have (t+134.631)(t-38.56)×1.22718 = 0

Therefore t = -134.631 s or 38.56 s as we only deal with positive values of time in the present question we have t₂ = 38.56 s and

v₂² = v₁² + 2·a₂·S  = (117.895 m/s)² + 2·2.45436 m/s²×6371 km = 45172.686

v₂ = 212.54 m/s

For final stage we have r = R and

[tex]F_{G3}[/tex] = 981.746 N and a₂ = F/m₁ = 9.81746 m/s²

Therefore the time from R to the arctic ocean  is given by

S₃ =R=v₂·t+0.5·a₂·t² = 212.54·t + 0.5·9.81746·t² = 6371

Which gives

Therefore t₃ = 20.382 s

Therefore, it will take about t₁ + t₂ + t₃ = 108.079 s + 38.56 s + 20.382 s  = 167.021 s  to splash down in the ocean

Use the formula t = sqrt((2 * d) / g), where d = 4R and g = G * (mass of earth) / (distance from center)^2 to calculate the time taken for the piano to hit the ocean from a height 3R above the Earth's surface.

This physics question deals with the concept of

gravity

and the formation of a free fall situation in a vacuum situation where no other forces (apart from gravitation) are considered. In this case, the value of gravity will not be 9.8 m/s^2, as we are not at the surface but at a distance 3 times the radius of Earth. To find how long the piano takes to hit the ocean, we need to use the following formula for the time taken (t) for an object to fall a certain distance under gravity: t = sqrt((2 * d) / g). Here, d is the total distance that the piano would fall, and g is the acceleration due to gravity. We would first need to calculate the distance the piano falls, which will be the sum of the Earth’s radius (R) and the height the piano is dropped from (3R). This equals 4R. Then, calculate the value of gravity at that point, using formula G * (mass of Earth)/(distance from point to center of earth)^2, and then substitute these values back into the equation.

Note

: This is a idealized scenario and other factors like air resistance, influence from moon and sun, and the non-uniform distribution of Earth’s mass etc., are not considered.

https://brainly.com/question/35699425

#SPJ3

Answer:

97.92% probability that the mean score of your sample is between 22 and 28

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this question, we have to understand the normal probability distribution and the central limit theorem.

Normal probability distribution:

Problems of normally distributed samples can be solved using the z-score formula.

In a set with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the zscore of a measure X is given by:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

The Z-score measures how many standard deviations the measure is from the mean. After finding the Z-score, we look at the z-score table and find the p-value associated with this z-score. This p-value is the probability that the value of the measure is smaller than X, that is, the percentile of X. Subtracting 1 by the pvalue, we get the probability that the value of the measure is greater than X.

Central limit theorem:

The Central Limit Theorem estabilishes that, for a random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], a large sample size can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]

In this problem, we have that:

[tex]\mu = 25, \sigma = 6.5, n = 25, s = \frac{6.5}{\sqrt{25}} = 1.3[/tex]

What is the probability that the mean score of your sample is between 22 and 28

This is the pvalue of Z when X = 28 subtracted by the pvalue of Z when X = 22. So

X = 28

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

By the Central Limit theorem

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{28 - 25}{1.3}[/tex]

[tex]Z = 2.31[/tex]

[tex]Z = 2.31[/tex] has a pvalue of 0.9896

X = 22

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{s}[/tex]

[tex]Z = \frac{22 - 25}{1.3}[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2.31[/tex]

[tex]Z = -2.31[/tex] has a pvalue of 0.0104

0.9896 - 0.0104 = 0.9792

97.92% probability that the mean score of your sample is between 22 and 28

Answer:

(a) 0.48006

(b) 0.3251

(c) 0.19489

(d) 97.5​% of people consumed less than 56 gallons of bottled​ water.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that the per capita consumption of bottled water is approximately normally distributed with a mean of 34.5 and a standard deviation of 11 gallons.

Let X = per capita consumption of bottled water

So, X ~ N([tex]\mu = 34.5,\sigma^{2} =11^{2}[/tex])

The z score probability distribution is given by;

            Z = [tex]\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex] ~ N(0,1)

(a) Probability that someone consumed more than 35 gallons of bottled​ water = P(X > 35)

   P(X > 35) = P( [tex]\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex] > [tex]\frac{35-34.5}{11}[/tex] ) = P(Z > 0.05) = 1 - P(Z [tex]\leq[/tex] 0.05)

                                                   = 1 - 0.51994 = 0.48006

(b) Probability that someone consumed between 25 and 35 gallons of bottled​ water = P(25 < X < 35)

   P(25 < X < 35) = P(X < 35) - P(X [tex]\leq[/tex] 25)

   P(X < 35) = P( [tex]\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex] < [tex]\frac{35-34.5}{11}[/tex] ) = P(Z < 0.05) = 0.51994

   P(X [tex]\leq[/tex] 25) = P( [tex]\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex] [tex]\leq[/tex] [tex]\frac{25-34.5}{11}[/tex] ) = P(Z [tex]\leq[/tex] -0.86) = 1 - P(Z < 0.86)

                                                   = 1 - 0.80511 = 0.19489

Therefore, P(25 < X < 35) = 0.51994 - 0.19489 = 0.3251

(c) Probability that someone consumed less than 25 gallons of bottled​ water = P(X < 25)

     P(X < 25) = P( [tex]\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex] < [tex]\frac{25-34.5}{11}[/tex] ) = P(Z < -0.86) = 1 - P(Z [tex]\leq[/tex] 0.86)

                                                   = 1 - 0.80511 = 0.19489

(d) We have to find that 97.5​% of people consumed less than how many gallons of bottled​ water, which means ;

    P(X < x) = 0.975

    P( [tex]\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex] > [tex]\frac{x-34.5}{11}[/tex] ) = 0.975

    P(Z > [tex]\frac{x-34.5}{11}[/tex] ) = 0.975

Now in the z table the critical value of X which have an area less than 0.975 is 1.96, i.e.;

           [tex]\frac{x-34.5}{11}[/tex] = 1.96

        [tex]x[/tex] - 34.5 = [tex]1.96 \times 11[/tex]

                  [tex]x[/tex]  = 34.5 + 21.56 = 56.06 ≈ 56 gallons of bottled water

So, 97.5​% of people consumed less than 56 gallons of bottled​ water.

a. The probability that someone consumed more than 35 gallons of bottled water is approximately 52.12%. b. The probability that someone consumed between 25 and 35 gallons of bottled water is approximately 9.58%. c. The probability that someone consumed less than 25 gallons of bottled water is approximately 42.51%. d. 97.5% of people consumed less than approximately 57.56 gallons of bottled water.

a. To find the probability that someone consumed more than 35 gallons of bottled water, we need to standardize the value of 35 using the formula z = (x - mean) / standard deviation, where x is the value we want to find the probability for. In this case, x = 35. Plugging in the values, we get z = (35 - 34.5) / 11 = 0.045. Using a standard normal distribution table, the probability (area under the curve) to the right of 0.045 is approximately 0.5212. Therefore, the probability that someone consumed more than 35 gallons of bottled water is 0.5212 or 52.12%.

b. To find the probability that someone consumed between 25 and 35 gallons of bottled water, we need to find the probability to the right of 25 (P(x > 25)) and subtract the probability to the right of 35 (P(x > 35)). Following the same process as in part (a), we find that P(x > 25) ≈ 0.5746 and P(x > 35) ≈ 0.4788. Therefore, the probability that someone consumed between 25 and 35 gallons of bottled water is approximately 0.5746 - 0.4788 = 0.0958 or 9.58%.

c. To find the probability that someone consumed less than 25 gallons of bottled water, we need to find the probability to the left of 25 (P(x < 25)). Using the standard normal distribution table, we find that P(x < 25) ≈ 0.4251. Therefore, the probability that someone consumed less than 25 gallons of bottled water is approximately 0.4251 or 42.51%.

d. To find the value at which 97.5% of people consumed less than, we need to find the z-score that corresponds to the 97.5th percentile of the standard normal distribution. Using the standard normal distribution table, we find that the z-score corresponding to the 97.5th percentile is approximately 1.96. Now we can use the formula z = (x - mean) / standard deviation to solve for x. Plugging in the values, we get 1.96 = (x - 34.5) / 11. Solving for x, we find x ≈ 1.96 * 11 + 34.5 ≈ 57.56. Therefore, 97.5% of people consumed less than approximately 57.56 gallons of bottled water.

https://brainly.com/question/35203949

#SPJ3

Answer and Step-by-step explanation:

The answer is attached below

To identify a second solution y2 from a given differential equation and its solution y1, it is necessary to extract P(x) from the differential equation, compute integral -∫P(x) dx, and multiply the result by the function y1.

First, we need to find the function P(x) in the equation y2 = y1(x) e−∫P(x) dx (5). Looking at the given differential equation (1 − 2x − x2)y'' + 2(1 + x)y' − 2y = 0; y1 = x + 1, we can rearrange terms and find that P(x) is equal to -2(1+x)/(1-2x-x2). Then, we can calculate the integral -∫P(x) dx, and multiply this by our given solution y1 to find the second solution y2. It's important to remember that when carrying out these steps, accuracy is crucial since each step builds on the last.

https://brainly.com/question/33433874

#SPJ3

Answer:

See answers below

Step-by-step explanation:

# prior

mu0 <- 5

k0 <- 1

s20 <- 4

nu0 <- 2

# read in data

dat <- list()

dat[1] <- read.table("school1.dat")

dat[2] <- read.table("school2.dat")

dat[3] <- read.table("school3.dat")

n <- sapply(dat, length)

ybar <- sapply(dat, mean)

s2 <- sapply(dat, var)

# posterior

kn <- k0 + n

nun <- nu0 + n

mun <- (k0 * mu0 + n * ybar)/kn

s2n <- (nu0 * s20 + (n - 1) * s2 + k0 * n * (ybar - mu0)^2/kn)/nun

# produce a posterior sample for the parameters

s.postsample <- s2.postsample <- theta.postsample <- matrix(0, 10000, 3, dimnames = list(NULL,  

   c("school1", "school2", "school3")))

for (i in c(1, 2, 3)) {

   s2.postsample[, i] <- 1/rgamma(10000, nun[i]/2, s2n[i] * nun[i]/2)

   s.postsample[, i] <- sqrt(s2.postsample[, i])

   theta.postsample[, i] <- rnorm(10000, mun[i], s.postsample[, i]/sqrt(kn[i]))

}

# posterior mean and 95% CI for Thetas (the means)

colMeans(theta.postsample)

## school1 school2 school3  

##   9.294   6.943   7.814

apply(theta.postsample, 2, function(x) {

   quantile(x, c(0.025, 0.975))

})

##       school1 school2 school3

## 2.5%    7.769   5.163   6.152

## 97.5%  10.834   8.719   9.443

# posterior mean and 95% CI for the Standard Deviations

colMeans(s.postsample)

## school1 school2 school3  

##   3.904   4.397   3.757

apply(s.postsample, 2, function(x) {

   quantile(x, c(0.025, 0.975))

})

##            school1 school2 school3

## 2.5%    2.992   3.349   2.800

## 97.5%   5.136   5.871   5.139

The question calls for Bayesian inference with a normal model and a conjugate prior to derive posterior distributions and probabilities concerning means and standard deviations. Statistical software such as R or Python with libraries like PyMC3 is needed to perform the detailed computations, which are not provided here.

The provided question involves advanced statistical analysis, specifically Bayesian inference with prior distributions and the computation of posterior probabilities. Unfortunately, without software or computational methods to process the provided datasets for schools school1.dat, school2.dat, and school3.dat, a comprehensive answer cannot be provided. However, the general approach to tackle this problem would involve:

To complete the analysis, one would typically utilize statistical software capable of Bayesian computation, such as R or Python with appropriate libraries (e.g., PyMC3).

https://brainly.com/question/31448061

#SPJ3

Answer: The probability of drawing a red marble the sixth time is 1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

Here is the complete question:

A box contains 10 red marbles and 10 green marbles. Sampling at random from the box five times with replacement, you have drawn a red marble all five times. What is the probability of drawing a red marble the sixth time?

Explanation:

Since the sampling at random from the box containing the marbles is with replacement, that is, after picking a marble, it is replaced before picking another one, the probability of picking a red marble is the same for each sampling. Probability, P(A) is given by the ratio of the number of favourable outcome to the total number of favourable outcome.

From the question,

Number of favourable outcome = number of red marbles =10

Total number of favourable outcome = total number of marbles = 10+10= 20

Hence, probability of drawing a red marble P(R) = 10 ÷ 20

P(R) = 1/2

Since the probability of picking a red marble is the same for each sampling, the probability of picking a red marble the sixth time is 1/2

The probability is [tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

First, we have to calculate the probability of drawing a red marble on any given try using the formula of probability:

Probability of an event = [tex]\frac{Number\ of\ favorable\ outcomes}{Total\ number\ of\ outcomes}[/tex]

P(red) = [tex]\frac{Number\ of\ red\ marbles}{Total\ number\ of\ marbles} =\frac{10}{20} = \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

Since we are replacing after every time we pick up a marble, each event of picking a marble is an independent event

Thus, every time a marble is to be picked, the probabilities remain same.

Hence the probability of drawing a red marble the sixth time is = [tex]P(red) = \frac{1}{2}[/tex]

The complete question is:
A box contains 10 red marbles and 10 green marbles. Sampling at random from the box five times with replacement, you have drawn a red marble all five times. What is the probability of drawing a red marble the sixth time?