Answer:
The type of government that is in Russia is called?
socialism
communism
democracy
monarchy
Hope this helps :)
Have a great day !
5INGH
Explanation:
NEED HELPP NOWW FAST RIGHT AMSWERS!!!!!!!
Consult a current dictionary or other reference book and write a brief definition of technology.
Answer:
The application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry.Machinery and equipment developed from the application of scientific knowledge.
There are many possible definitions of technology, as this complex term has many factors that can complicate its interpretation. However, one of these definitions could look something like this:
Technology: the collection of techniques, processes and methods that are used in the production of goods or services.
A) What were the terms of the compromise that gave Rutherford B. Hayes the presidency in 1876?
B) how were African Americans in the south affected by this compromise?
Answer:
(A) The Compromise of 1877 was an informal, unwritten deal that resolved the disputed 1876 presidential election between Democratic candidate Samuel Tilden and the Republican Rutherford B. Hayes. The terms where that Hayes would become president in exchange for the withdrawal of federal troops from the South and the granting of home rule in the South. The withdrawal of federal troops from Louisiana and South Carolina formally ended the Reconstruction Era.
(B) The Compromise of 1877 had a major effect on the former slaves. There was a dispute over electoral votes in the election of 1876. The South agreed to let the Republican candidate, Rutherford B. Hayes, win the election in order to get federal troops out of the South that were enforcing Reconstruction. This should have been a sign that the southerners were planning to make major changes once Reconstruction ended.
The strategy which calls for peaceful protest and the rejection of violence, even for self-defense, best describes A. sit-ins. B. nonviolent resistance. C. Black Power. D. Freedom Rides
Answer:
The answer would be B).
Explanation:
B discribes the way the protesters were lead by civil rights activest like Marten luther king jr or even Ceaser Chaves.
Answer: Nonviolent Resistance
Explanation: To achieve their goals, the sit-in protesters practiced this strategy of peaceful protest (nonviolent resistance) and rejected the use of violence, even for self- defense.
What was the unintended impact of the fugitive slave act?
Answer:
It created hostility towards slavery among Northerners who had been indifferent.
The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 had unintended consequences including an expansion of federal power, corruption, and increased tensions between northerners and southerners.
Explanation:The unintended impact of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 had several consequences. Firstly, it led to an expansion of federal power and increased the nation's policing powers. Secondly, the act undermined local and state laws, leading to corruption and the enslavement of free black northerners. Lastly, the law further alarmed northerners and confirmed the existence of a "Slave Power," a minority of elite slaveholders who used federal power to protect and promote slavery.
what major allied power refused to join the leage of nations following the end of world war I
Answer:
The United States of America
Explanation:
The United States of America refused to join the League of Nations following the end of World War I.
“Sixteen countries came together to estimate their economic needs for recovery.”
A.United Nations
B. Marshall Plan
C.MacArthur’sPlan for Japan
B Marshall’s plan hope it helped
The Marshall plan involved sixteen nations coming together to estimate their recovery's economic needs. Therefore, option B is correct.
What was the Marshall plan?The Marshall Plan was a program of economic assistance initiated by the United States in the aftermath of World War II. It was named after Secretary of State George Marshall, who proposed the plan in a speech given at Harvard University in 1947.
The goal of the Marshall Plan was to help rebuild the economies of Western Europe, which had been devastated by the war. The United States believed that a strong, stable Europe was crucial for its own security and prosperity. The plan offered financial aid to European countries that were willing to cooperate with each other and the United States to promote economic growth and political stability.
The Marshall Plan provided over $12 billion in aid to 16 countries over a four-year period. The aid was used to support a variety of projects, including infrastructure improvements, industrial modernization, and agricultural development. The plan was successful in jumpstarting the economic recovery of Western Europe and is often credited with helping to create the conditions for the long period of peace and prosperity that followed.
Learn more about Marshall Plan here:
https://brainly.com/question/1373135
#SPJ3
what was the significance of the august revolt?
The August revolt was one of the major rebellions against the early soviet government.
It was an unsuccessful rebellion against the established authority. The main agenda of the revolution was to refuse the order of the established regime.
It took place from late August to early September in the year 1924. It was aimed at restoring the independence of Georgia from the Soviet Union. Thousands of Georgians lost their life during this rebellion.
The rebellion was not entirely successful and it also created a loss of life and property to people. It was not planned properly, took the opposite shape, and negatively affected people.
To make it successful the people of Georgia should have a proper plan and a strong military force, as the Soviet Union was in power for a long time and they were stronger.
Learn more about the Soviet Union:
https://brainly.com/question/25774915
john maynard keynes was best known for promoting the idea that the governments should
Answer:
John Maynard Keynes was one of the most important economists of the 20th century, who developed an economic theory to solve the problems of the great depression. According to him, during an economic crisis, the government should increase its intervention and performance in the economy, in order to supply the deficiencies created by market failures. In this sense, during difficult economic times, the government would enhance its spending in different areas, like social plans, public health, labor, and education, to cover basic needs and solve the problems derived from a critical market.
Explanation:
John Maynard Keynes promoted the ideas regarding the intervention of government in the functioning of an economy.
Who was John Maynard Keynes?John Maynard Keynes was an influential economist who gave a great emphasis and developed theories regarding the intervention of government in the national economy.
He further supported the idea that the control of an economy in the hands of a government will help in efficient and optimum utilization of all the resources available with the nation.
Hence, the aforementioned ideas were promoted by John Maynard Keynes.
Learn more about John Maynard Keynes here:
https://brainly.com/question/11033570
#SPJ2
Anti-Semitism in Europe during the 1880s caused many Jews to relocate to
Palestine.
Israel.
the United States.
Great Britain.
It should be noted that Anti-Semitism in Europe during the 1880s caused many Jews to relocate to Palestine.
What is Antisemitism?
Antisemitism can be regarded as hostility as well as prejudice towards Jews by the antisemite.
It was a rough period of discriminations against jews and this made some of the relocate to different regions such as Palestine.
Therefore, option A is correct.
\Learn more about Antisemitism at:
https://brainly.com/question/1078780
Anti-Semitism in Europe during the 1880s caused many Jewish people to relocate to Palestine.
Who (or what) was Roosevelt referring to when he said, the hand that held the dagger has struck it into France's back?
Answer:
On June 10,1940 US president Franklin D Roosevelt gave his famous speech "Stab in the Back" at University of Virginia.
On the speech He mentioned that the hand that held the dagger has struck into it's neighbor's back. Here he referred Italy and Mussolini as the hand which held dagger and France was the neighbor.
Because on June 10,1940 Italy declared war against France and Britain and joined to Germany on axis power. Mussolini said Italy was joining war against France and Britain as for keeping promise to Germany.
Roosevelt mentioned this incident for in his speech as the hand held dagger has struck into France's back.
Moreover, in this speech, He made a proclamation about removing America's neutral position in war and soon declared the Mediterranean see as a combat zone.
Explanation:
What was the effect of Carter’s attempts to free the hostages in Iran? The hostages were returned to the United States immediately. The United States increased its purchase of Iranian oil. All of Carter’s attempts failed. The Sandinistas were overthrown.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. All of Carter's attempts failed.
Explanation:
The taking of hostages at the US embassy in Iran in 1979 lasted 444 days, between 1979 and 1981. It all began on November 4, 1979, when between 300 and 400 Islamist students jumped over the wall that surrounded the building from the US embassy in Tehran and, after defeating the Marines who were guarding him, they settled in place without letting anyone go.
64 hostages, handcuffed and blindfolded, were distributed in different buildings of the complex. After the release of a dozen of them, 52 remained in captivity. The Islamists demanded the extradition of the Shah, Mohammed Pahlavi, protected by the United States and who had left the country eight months earlier, after the Islamic revolution evicted him from power.
The kidnappers remained firm during the 14 months of the hostages taking, which ended on January 20, 1981, when President Ronald Reagan, Jimmy Carter's successor, took office, to which the Islamic authorities refused to make concessions. Even though the negotiation was not successful because two rescue operations were failed, and that was one of the reasons for his non-re-election, President Carter achieved liberation on the last day of his term as emissary of the Reagan administration.
Note: Same answer to question 12535400
Answer:
Correct answer is C
Explanation:
Took the test.
The Constitution gives Congress the power to create federal courts
Answer:
Lower than the Supreme Court, is the right answer.
Explanation:
Under the Constitution of the United States, the federal judiciary is one of the three divisions of the federal administration. Article III of the U.S. Constitution dictates the foundation of a Supreme Court and authorizes Congress to organize other federal courts, and place restrictions on their jurisdiction. However, the establishment of the federal courts must be lower than the Supreme Court.
Congress has the power to create federal courts lower than the Supreme Court, such as appellate and district courts, but no courts higher than or equal to it. All decisions made by these lower courts are subject to review by the Supreme Court.
There are no federal courts that are higher than or equal to the Supreme Court, nor are there any that are unaffected by the Supreme Court's decisions. Congress exercised this authority through the Judiciary Act of 1789, establishing a system that includes 13 Courts of Appeal, 96 federal district courts, and specialized courts such as the Court of Military Appeals, tax courts, bankruptcy courts, claims courts, and international trade courts. The Supreme Court, as the highest court, has the power to overrule decisions made by lower courts.
The complete question is
The Constitution gives Congress the power to create federal courts
lower than the Supreme Court.
higher than the Supreme Court.
equal to the Supreme Court.
unaffected by the Supreme Court.
Why did woodrow wilson push the league of nations?
Answer : Most important for Wilson, the League would guarantee the territorial integrity and political independence of member states, authorize the League to take “any action…to safeguard the peace,” establish procedures for arbitration, and create the mechanisms for economic and military sanctions.
which advantage did the North have over the South at the start of the Civil War?
A.it had a smaller population that required less food and less supplies.
B. It had of a far more extensive network of railroads and telegraph lines.
C. It had the support of the British Navy in blockading southern ports.
D. It had many cotton plantations to provide fabric for uniforms.
Answer:
B. It had of a far more extensive network of railroads and telegraph lines.
Explanation:
This aided the ability to move troops and supplies much quicker than the south, and faster communications.
the two opium wars were between china and
Answer:
China (Qing Dynasty) and the British Empire
Explanation:
The opium wars were two wars that took place in the middle of the 19th century. The wars were between China, with the Manchurian Qing Dynasty as its leader, and the British Empire. The opium wars got their name because basically the wars were waged because of the opium trade. The British wanted to impose the opium on China through trade, and the Chinese of course did not wanted that to happen, so they went to war. The British turned out as the victorious side in this wars, and that had huge negative impact for around a century on the Chinese development and economy.
Which of the following is Not true regarding the role of women and minorities in the military during WW2?
a. women served in combat
b. The Tuskagee Airmen were an example of African- Americans military contributions to the war.
c. Mexican Americans won several Congressional Medals of Honor for their services as "cold-talkers"
d. Native Americans who fought in the war were nicknamed "WACS."
Answer:
A
Explanation:
women were not aloud to serve
what was one of the main causes of World War II
Answer:
Pearl Harbor
Explanation:
The main causes of World War II were Adolf Hitler's pursuit of a German empire and the rise of fascist ideologies as alternatives to liberal democracy during the Great Depression. Additionally, systemic international tensions and Japanese militaristic expansion due to perceived western injustices contributed significantly to the outbreak of the war.
Explanation:Main Causes of World War IIOne of the main causes of World War II was Adolf Hitler's ambition for German expansion and the establishment of a vast empire. Hitler's ideologies of race and space drove Nazi Germany's aggressive foreign policy. This included the annexation of territories such as Austria and the Sudetenland, leading to increased tensions and the eventual outbreak of war. Furthermore, the impacts of the Great Depression led to disillusionment with liberal democracy and a rise in fascism and authoritarian regimes across Europe and Japan, with many seeing these as viable alternatives to the economic crisis they faced. This ideological shift played a significant role in the war's origins, as did Japan's aspirations for dominating East Asia, which paralleled Nazi racial ideology.
The systemic causes of the conflict included Germany and Japan seeking to overturn the international order dominated by Britain, France, and the U.S., and to seek retribution for the perceived injustices of post-World War I treaties and disarmament agreements. The invasion of Manchuria by Japan in 1931 and the subsequent Japanese aggression in China were early acts of militaristic expansion that contributed to the global nature of the engagement. The racist ideologies not only of Nazi Germany but also of Japan fueled atrocities and military campaigns aimed at establishing racial dominance.
WW2 began because great Great Britain and france refused to allow germany to invade austria true or false
Answer:
It was before WWII and it was an attempt to make Austria a part of a Greater Germany and therefore legitimize Hitler’s birthplace as German
There are a lot of reasons, it may be false tho
Answer:
False
Explanation:
What happened was Germany and the USSR invaded Poland, Britain and France joined in to fight.
PLEASE HELP WILL MARK BRAINIEST NEED IN 10 MINUTES 62 POINTS! AND NO FAKE ANSWERS! THIS IS MY SECOND TRY SO PLEASE HELP!
Step #1:
Your job is to interview one of the following key figures:
Genghis Khan
Kublai Khan
Marco Polo
Step #2:
Once you have chosen your key figure to interview you must design four questions to ask your key figure. You can either create your own four unique questions to ask or you can choose four from the following suggested questions.
Here are some possible questions that you might ask:
Who are you?
Where did you travel during your lifetime, and what were your goals?
What was your greatest achievement, and what effect did this achievement have on civilization?
What effects did your accomplishments have on the people of Asia and Europe?
What was your most vivid memory of your travels, and why is it important to history?
What was the most significant change you witnessed while on your travels?
Step #3:
Now that you have chosen your four questions, you must answer the questions based on what you have learned in the lesson. Make sure to answer them in first person as if your key figure was talking and answering the questions. You should include information displaying your knowledge of the Mongol Empire, the events that happened during its time period, and the people involved.
Questions
Who are you?Where did you travel during your lifetime, and what were your goals?What was your greatest achievement, and what effect did this achievement have on civilization?What was your most vivid memory of your travels, and why is it important to history?Answers
I am Marco Polo, a Venetian traveler who traveled from Europe to Asia.Throughout my lifetime, I traveled first through the Middle East, and then throughout China. After, when I traveled back, I traveled sometimes by sea and sometimes by land. My goals were to spread Christianity and to establish good relations with the Yuan Dynasty.My greatest achievement was pioneering routes to China. This helped strengthen things like the Silk Road, which let both Europe and Asia prosper immensely.My most vivid memory of my travels was when I met Kublai Khan. It was important to history because I helped Kublai Khan and also gained trust of him, which improved relations.Hope this helps-
I have chosen to interview Genghis Khan, the founder and first emperor of the Mongol Empire.
Who was Genghis Khan?I am Genghis Khan, the first emperor of the Mongol Empire. I was born with the name Temujin in 1162 in Mongolia. I rose to power through a series of battles and alliances, and I am known for being a skilled warrior and a strategic leader.
Where did you travel during your lifetime, and what were your goals?
As the leader of the Mongol Empire, I traveled extensively throughout Asia and Europe. My goal was to expand my empire and establish Mongol dominance over the entire region. I conquered vast territories, including China, Central Asia, and parts of Eastern Europe. I also sent emissaries to establish diplomatic relationships with other rulers and learn about their cultures.
What was your greatest achievement, and what effect did this achievement have on civilization?
My greatest achievement was the establishment of the Mongol Empire, which was the largest contiguous land empire in history. Through my conquests, I brought about a period of stability and prosperity in the lands under my rule. I also established a system of laws and governance that promoted fairness and justice. My legacy also includes promoting religious tolerance and the development of trade and commerce along the Silk Road.
What effects did your accomplishments have on the people of Asia and Europe?
My accomplishments had both positive and negative effects on the people of Asia and Europe. On one hand, I brought stability and order to many regions, and my promotion of religious tolerance helped to prevent conflicts between different faiths.
On the other hand, my conquests also caused much suffering and destruction, and many people were killed or enslaved. The Mongol Empire also disrupted existing power structures and caused significant cultural and social changes. Ultimately, my legacy is complex and continues to be debated by historians and scholars.
Learn more about Genghis Khan here
https://brainly.com/question/464005
#SPJ3
Law enacted in 1973 that limited a presidents right to send troops into battle without consulting congress
"The correct answer is Law enacted in 1973 that limited a presidents right to send troops into battle without consulting congress War Powers Resolution of 1973.
The War Powers Resolution was enacted on November 7, 1973, overriding a presidential veto by President Richard Nixon. This federal law was passed to check the power of the President of the United States in committing U.S. armed forces to military action without the consent of Congress. The resolution was passed in the wake of the Vietnam War, as there was a growing concern in Congress about the ability of the President to send American forces into combat without a formal declaration of war.
The War Powers Resolution requires the President to consult with Congress before deploying U.S. forces into hostilities or situations where hostilities are imminent. It also requires the President to report to Congress within 48 hours of introducing American forces into hostilities or into situations where hostilities are imminent.
Furthermore, the resolution limits the duration of any such deployment to 60 days unless Congress authorizes the use of force or extends the deadline. An additional 30 days are provided for the safe withdrawal of forces.
The intent of the War Powers Resolution is to ensure that Congress, which has the constitutional authority to declare war, is involved in decisions that may lead the United States into a war or a significant military action.
Despite its intent, the resolution has been the subject of debate and has been criticized by various presidents, who have argued that it infringes on the president's constitutional powers as commander-in-chief. Nevertheless, it remains an important piece of legislation that has shaped the way military actions are undertaken and overseen by the U.S. government."
Why did some Americans believe the New Deal had gone too far ?
Answer:
Republicans and the wealthy thought that the programs were too socialistic . Critics felt that the taxes were unfair for the wealthy and that compulsory programs like social security were considered unconstitutional. Some Americans also felt that the government had too much power.
Hope this helps! :)
Final answer:
Some Americans thought the New Deal had gone too far due to excessive government interference in the economy, the federal government's deficit spending, and a shift towards socialism. Critics feared the impact on free enterprise and the potential for crippling long-term debt.
Explanation:
Some Americans believed the New Deal had gone too far for several reasons. Primarily, critics from the political right argued that the New Deal resulted in excessive government interference in the business sector and deviated from the United States' capitalist principles. They were concerned that the policies of deficit spending — spending more money than the government receives in tax revenues — were leading the country deep into debt, which could have long-term detrimental impacts on the nation's financial stability. Moreover, the expansion of the government's role in the economy was seen as a dangerous shift towards socialism or fascism, and conservatives feared that this interference would hinder a natural recovery by imposing higher taxes and discouraging investment. There was a belief that New Deal policies favored unions and big businesses at the expense of smaller companies and consumers. The criticism was not just limited to economic policies, but also extended to the perceived overreach in federal power, challenging the dual-federalism structure that had previously defined the relationship between the federal government and the states.
Which statement was one of the reasons for the successful Invasion of northern India by Muslim rulers in the late 1100s?
Hindu princes followed the principle of nonviolence and did not oppose the invading armles.
Muslim Invaders came to India on the pretext of establishing trade relations and staged coups from within before taking control of northern India.
Muslim invaders established alliances with Sikh princes, and their combined military might resulted in the successful invasion of northern India.
Hindu princes wasted resources battling one another instead of uniting against a common enemy.
Answer:
Hindu princes wasted resources battling one another instead of uniting against a common enemy
Explanation:
In the period when the Mughal Empire was on the rise and started to move toward the Indian subcontinent in order to conquer it, the Hindu princes were fighting against one another. There was not a large and unified Hindu nations, but instead there were multiple smaller ones that were constantly wasting their resources on fighting with one another. The Mughals used this situation and managed to conquer the northern part of India without any particular problem. This led to the establishment of the first Muslim Empire on Indian soil, and that led to Islamization of lot of people in that area over the course of several centuries.
In the late 1600s settlers in the middle colonies were
Answer:
B
Explanation:
By the late 1600s, settlers in the middle colonies were
A) religiously diverse.
B) mostly Catholic.
C) mostly Quaker.
D) religiously similar.
Answer:
religiously diverse
Explanation:
✹ BRAINLIEST WILL BE CHOSEN ✹
What early civilization's inhabited region is shown in the map above?
A) - Egyptian
B) - Mesopotamian
C) - Sumerian
D) - Indus Valley
Answer:
What early civilisation's inhabited region is shown in the map above?
A) - Egyptian
B) - Mesopotamian
C) - Sumerian
D) - Indus Valley
Hope this helps :)
Have a great day !
5INGH
Explanation:
D) - Indus Valley
The Indus Valley Civilisation (IVC) was a Bronze Age civilization in the northwestern regions of South Asia, lasting from 3300 BC to 1300 BC, and in its mature form from 2600 BC to 1900 BC. Along with ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia it was one of three early civilisations of the region comprising North Africa, West Asia and South Asia, and of the three, the most widespread, its sites spanning an area stretching from northeast Afghanistan, through much of Pakistan, and into western and northwestern India. It flourished in the basins of the Indus River, which flows through the length of Pakistan, and along a system of perennial, mostly monsoon-fed, rivers that once coursed in the vicinity of the seasonal Ghaggar-Hakra river in northwest India and eastern Pakistan.
The Indus cities are noted for their urban planning, a technical and political process concerned with the use of land and design of the urban environment. They are also noted for their baked brick houses, elaborate drainage systems, water supply systems, and clusters of large, nonresidential buildings.
The Indus civilisation is also known as the Harappan civilisation, after its type site Harappa, the first to be excavated early in the 20th century in what was then the Punjab province of British India and is now Punjab, Pakistan.The Harappan civilization was located in the Indus River valley. Its two large cities, Harappa and Mohenjo-daro, were located in present-day Pakistan's Punjab and Sindh provinces, respectively. Its extent reached as far south as the Gulf of Khambhat and as far east as the Yamuna (Jumna) River.Even today, people across the greater Indus Valley speak several tongues including Indo-Aryan, Dardic, Iranian, along with the isolated Dravidian language Brahui and the language isolate Burushaski.learn more about Indus valley, refer
https://brainly.com/question/13582591
#SPJ2
who was the 5th president
Answer:
The 5th President of the united States was James Monroe
Explanation:
Answer:
James Monroe was the 5th President of the united States
hope this helps :)
The international criminal court responded to the crisis in Darcie by
Answer:
issuing a warrant for the arrest of the Sudanese president
sending troops to the region to ultimately end the conflict
financially aiding the Janjaweed
supporting the Arab dominated government
Explanation:
Answer:
issuing a warrant for the arrest of the Sudanese president
Explanation:
jUst TooK tHE teSt
Compare and contrast the Chief successes and failures of TWO of the following presidential administrations:
George H.W. Bush
Bill Clinton
George W. Bush
Barack Obama
Analyze to what extent the conservative resurgence changes economic and social policies of the United States government from 1980-2008
Sry I am not sure but I think one of them is Bill Clinton
The presidential administrations of George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton had their successes and failures. However, both were shaped by the conservative resurgence from 1980-2008, influencing their approach to economic and social policies.
Explanation:This question requires a comparison of the successes and failures of two presidential administrations, specifically those of George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton. Bush Sr.'s major successes were his leadership during the Gulf War and peaceful handling of the Soviet Union's dissolution, while his economic recession and broken tax pledge were major downsides. Clinton's administration is praised for economic growth and welfare reform but criticized for scandals and missed opportunities in foreign policy.
Both administrations faced unique circumstances and left different legacies, but they both operated within the larger context of the conservative resurgence from 1980-2008. This political shift impacted economic and social policies, favoring deregulation, tax cuts, and a reduced role of government in economic matters, alongside a more conservative stance on social issues. As a result, both Bush and Clinton followed more conservative economic policies than their predecessors.
Learn more about Presidential Administrationshttps://brainly.com/question/12627260
#SPJ1
which phrase best summarizes the theory of evolution by natural selection?
A: life must come from other life
B: populations change over long periods of time
C: parent organisms pass on traits they have acquired during their life time
D: Only the strongest animals survive
D. Only the strongest animals survive.
C I think is the answer
"Bacon's Rebellion" was mainly caused by
Answer:
The immediate cause of the rebellion was Governor Berkeley's refusal to retaliate for a series of Native American attacks on frontier settlements. In addition, many colonists wished to attack and claim Native American frontier land westward, but they were denied permission by Gov. Berkeley.
Explanation:
Answer:
"Bacon's Rebellion" was mainly caused by economic hardship and distrust of Virginia colonists who were unable to acquire land.
Explanation:
Bacon's Rebellion was a revolt unleashed in 1676 in the British colony of Virginia by whites living on the border with Native Americans, later joined by black slaves and white servants.
It unleashed about the American Indian threat in a context of agricultural crisis and misery. Border Whites believe that Jamestown's governor, William Berkeley, must wage a total war against the Natives, who had embarked on guerrilla warfare as a result of disputes with the settlers. Nathaniel Bacon, elected to Virginia's House of Commons in the spring, and cousin of Frances Culpeper, the wife of Governor William Berkeley, advocated the establishment of armed detachments to fight the Amerindians. The governor accused him of rebellion and had him imprisoned. Two thousand Virginia settlers immediately marched on Jamestown to lend their support.
Berkeley released Bacon after a promise of public repentance. But Bacon escaped, reforming his militias and started harassing the Natives. In July, he wrote a "Declaration of the People" which reproached the administration for its unjust taxes, its favoritism, its stranglehold on the fur trade and its abandonment of the farmers facing the Amerindians. Bacon then attacked the Amerindian pamunkeys, considered harmless, killing eight, making prisoners and seizing their property. In the fall, he fell ill and died at the age of 26. A thirty-gun ship, commanded by Thomas Grantham, was tasked by the British crown with subduing the revolt. Twenty-three rebel leaders were hanged. The Virginia assembly would amnesty most whites who participated in the revolt, but not blacks.
What is just war theory
Answer:
war theory is
Explanation:
Just war theory deals with the justification of how and why wars are fought. The justification can be either theoretical or historical.
Just war theory is a philosophical framework assessing the moral justification of wars, requiring criteria like moral reason, good intention, and legitimate authority. It includes aspects like humanitarian intervention, underscoring the complexities of moral arguments in warfare and foreign policy.
Explanation:Just war theory is a philosophical framework used to assess whether a war can be morally justified. It has a long history that weaves through various ethical and political discussions, reaching back to ancient thinkers and being codified in the modern era by Hugo Grotius in 1625. According to this theory, for a war to be considered just, it must meet several criteria such as having a moral reason, good intention, declared by a legitimate authority, the expected benefit should outweigh the harm, and there should be a reasonable chance of success.
One critical aspect of the theory is its emphasis on moral justification, such as preventing atrocities or defending against unjust aggression. In historical contexts, moral justifications often aligned with religious teachings, such as those of the Catholic Church for the Spanish, or the societal need for justice envisioned by Christian thinkers like Augustine of Hippo. These justifications underscore the theory's vital role in debating the legitimacy of warfare, where the criteria aim to ensure that violence is used as a last resort and within ethical confines.
An extension of just war theory is humanitarian intervention. This controversial aspect legitimizes war when initiated for human security reasons, such as protecting human rights or liberating people from oppressive rulers. However, the theory also acknowledges the complexities of moral arguments in foreign policy, recognizing that what is deemed justifiable can vary greatly depending on perspective and context.