Southern expansionists wanted to add more territory to the US so they could spread the pro-slavery territory over the slave-free territory. Because of that, they hoped to bring Cuba and other territories to the US and enlarge the empire of slavery.
Also, during that time, Haiti had a slave revolt and overthrew their masters and created a black republic. The Slaveowners did not want that since they wanted to expand pro-slave territory.
Also, they believed that Britain was interested in the Island because of sugar and since Britain prohibited slavery in their colonies, Cuba would be free.
What was the effect and importance of Great Britain’s promise of freedom to slaves who joined the British side?
During the American Revolution, most of the slaves could not serve in the army, free blacks could but slaves could not. Some historians say that the American Revolution reinforced the idea of a racial identity based on skin color.
Because of that some slaves and blacks decided to fight for the British, because they offered them freedom for joining their cause, a thing that the Americans did not offer them.
Of the half a million slaves that were in the American colonies during the American Revolution, 20 thousand joined the British cause. Many slaves that belonged to George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, and others fled to the British side.
The main result was that this led to the largest slave uprising and the greatest emancipation until the Civil War. Some of those ex-slaves emigrated to Sierra Leone, Canada, and Britain.
Which of the following events were part of the early evolution of the Church in Russia? Select all that apply.
Answer:
The correct answers are (A): Prince Vladimir arranged mass baptisms in Kiev. (B):Princess Olga converted to Roman Catholicism and (E): Missionaries from Constantinople came to Russia.
Christianity was introduced into the East Slavic state of Kievan Rus (Russia) by Greek missionaries from Constantinople come to Russia during the 9th century. In 957 princess Olga of Kiev converted to Christianity when the Constantinople missionaries baptized her. Olga's grandson Vladimir, the prince of Kiev, was then Baptized in 988, he as well arranged a mass baptism for his residents at river Dnieper. Thus this became the iconic event that led to Christianization of Kiev as well as evolution of the church of Russia.
Explanation:
Please mark brainliest and have a great day!
The events that were part of the early evolution of the church in Russia are Prince Vladimir arranged mass baptisms. Princess Olga converted to Roman Catholicism and missionaries from Constantinople came to Russia.
What do you mean by an event?An event refers to the thing that happens or takes place.
The events that were part of the early evolution of the church in Russia are that prince Vladimir arranged mass baptisms, princess Olga converted to Roman Catholicism and missionaries came to Russia.
Learn more about an event here:
https://brainly.com/question/12961938
#SPJ2
Sylvester Graham’s reformers targeted ________.
the human body
nutrition
sexuality
all of the above
The correct answer is D. All of the above
Explanation:
Sylvester Graham was mainly known as a dietary reformer during the 19th century and in some cases considered as the "Father of Vegetarianism" because he supported the idea that meat had negative effects on the body and soul of people; besides this as dietary a Reformer Graham was influenced by religious ideas as he believed diet was linked to sexuality and physical pleasure as there were the result of going against the natural law that according to Graham was to eat only plants as Adam and Eve.
These ideas were controversial during the 19th century but also many people began supporting Graham's reforms and became reformers themselves that as Graham aimed at leading changes in diet that were related to the body, nutrition and soil as it was believed meat had negative effect in them, but also in sexuality as by keeping a correct diet lust could be prevented. Therefore, Sylvester Graham's reformers target all of the above (the human body, nutrition, and sexuality).
Final answer:
Sylvester Graham targeted the human body, nutrition, and sexuality in his health reform efforts, ultimately influencing diet, behavior, and the development of the Graham cracker.
Explanation:
Sylvester Graham, a minister and reformer best known for his advocacy of dietary reform, targeted all of the above: the human body, nutrition, and sexuality in his efforts to improve health and morals in society. His holistic approach combined vegetarianism with calls for temperance and sexual restraint, a regimen he believed would strengthen both the body and the spirit. His ideas led to the creation of the Graham cracker and influenced a movement known as 'Grahamites' who sought to live by his strict codes on diet and personal behavior.
Who won the popular vote in the election of 1824?
Andrew Jackson
Martin Van Buren
Henry Clay
John Quincy Adams
Answer:
John Quincy Adams
Explanation:
Mr. Quincy served as the sixth president of the United States of America from 1825 and 1829.
He was a public multiple politic and worked as a diplomatic, member of the house representative and senator.
He died in 1848 he did collapse on the floor of his house.
Answer:
john Q
Explanation:
What prompted the Embargo of 1807?
British soldiers burned the U.S. capitol.
The British supplied arms to Indian insurgents.
The British navy captured American ships on the high seas and impressed their sailors into service for the British.
The British hadn’t abandoned their posts in the Northwest Territory as required by Jay’s Treaty.
The correct answer is C. The British navy captured American ships on the high seas and impressed their sailors into service for the British.
Explanation:
The Embargo Act of 1807 was a law approved in 1807 in which American ships could not trade with other nations, that was a result of the Napoleonic Wars or the conflict between Great Britain and France especially because during some time the U.S. traded with both nations but with the Embargo of 1807 and other acts it was prohibited the U.S. traded with any of these countries and especially with France that was against Britain. Besides this, as Britain still controlled many aspects in the U.S. through this act it approved the British navy captured Ameican ships and also took men to support the war in Europe and as a result not only many ships were confiscated as part of the embargo but also many men were impressed or taken against their will to fight for Britain. Therefore, the Embargo of 1807 basically prompted that the British navy captured American ships on the high seas and impressed their sailors into service for the British.
The Embargo of 1807 was enacted by the American government in response to the British navy impressing American sailors into service. The intention was to force European nations to respect American rights through the withdrawal of trade, but it ended up damaging the U.S. economy and was widely disregarded.
Explanation:The Embargo of 1807 was a significant event in U.S. history. It was prompted by the British navy's practices of intercepting American ships on the high seas, capturing them, and pressing their sailors into service for the British. This is known as impressment. The U.S. government saw this as a severe violation of American sovereignty, leading President Thomas Jefferson to enact this embargo. The idea behind the Embargo Act was to force Britain and other European nations to respect American rights by withdrawing American trade.
However, the Embargo of 1807 ended up being a failure, as it severely damaged the U.S. economy and was widely disregarded and evaded. It was eventually replaced by the Non-Intercourse Act in 1809, which reopened trade with all nations except Britain and France until 1810.
Learn more about Embargo of 1807 here:https://brainly.com/question/33875137
#SPJ6
President Nixon took a bold diplomatic step in early 1972 when he ________.
went to Vienna
declared the Vietnam War over
met with Chinese leaders in Beijing
signed the Glasgow Accords
Answer:
C, met with Chinese leaders in Beijing
Explanation:
Richard Nixon was the first U.S. president to visit China. The two countries had no communication for the past 25 years and his visit was the first step to normalize the situation. The visit lasted for seven days and its other purpose was to gain more influence over China, as it was feared the Soviet Union had more leverage there.
The American people saw pictures of China on TV for the first time for more than two decades. Although the outcome of this visit is still controversial, it definitely put a wedge between China and the Soviet Union and opened China to the world.
How did muckrakers help initiate the Progressive Era?
The Muckrakers were a group of journalists and writers that provided an important spark and ignited the Progressive movement. They were interested in exposing the problems in American society and urged the public to identify solutions.
They helped initiate the Progressive Era by analyzing if those bad conditions were linked to corrupt politics, poor working conditions in factories, bad living conditions of the working class and others.
They sparkled this analysis into people who read the newspapers and that wanted to change for their lives and because of that, an agenda was created.
Final answer:
Muckrakers were journalists who initiated the Progressive Era by exposing societal ills and prompting public action, which led to legislative reforms addressing corruption, working conditions, and other problems.
Explanation:
Muckrakers were influential journalists and writers who helped initiate the Progressive Era by exposing deep-rooted issues plaguing the nation with the intention of rallying the public and prompting reform. These muckrakers brought to light problems like corrupt machine politics, harsh working and poor living conditions of the working class, amongst other societal ills. Their investigative work, published in various magazines and books, incited American citizens to act, which in turn led to the push for legislation addressing these problems. President Theodore Roosevelt, recognizing the power and influence of these journalists, despite his critique, dubbed them "muckrakers"—a term that suggested an unhealthy obsession with societal filth but which ultimately became a badge of honor among reform-minded writers.
By captivating a predominantly educated, middle-class audience, muckrakers were able to ensure that their calls for change reached the citizenry who had the potential to influence political action. Their efforts played a significant role in initiating reforms at the state and local levels in the early years of the twentieth century. This grassroots movement eventually gained traction at the federal level, leading to the Progressive Era—a period marked by a surge in social justice and the advent of regulations that aimed to remedy the social inequities of the day.
What was the chief goal of the Puritans?
to achieve a lasting peace with the Catholic nations of Spain and France
to eliminate any traces of Catholicism from the Church of England
to assist Henry VIII in his quest for an annulment to his marriage
to create a hierarchy within the Church of England modeled on that of the Catholic Church
Answer:
To eliminate any traces of Catholicism from the Church of England
Explanation:
Puritans were English Protestants in the 16th and 17th centuries. Their main goal was to purify the Church of England by eliminating all aspects of Catholicism from religious practices. They did not agree with many practices that were similar to the Roman Catholic Church.
The Puritans' main goal was to purge any remnants of Catholicism from the Church of England. They believed that the Church had not fully distanced itself from Catholic practices.
Explanation:The chief goal of the Puritans was to eliminate any traces of Catholicism from the Church of England. The Puritans were a group of English Protestants in the 16th and 17th centuries who sought to purify the Church of England of its practices they regarded as Roman Catholic.
The Puritans felt that the Church of England was not fully reformed and needed to continue its distance from Catholic practices
Learn more about Puritans here:https://brainly.com/question/37571405
#SPJ6
What was the First Great Awakening?
a cultural and intellectual movement that emphasized reason and science over superstition and religion
a Protestant revival that emphasized emotional, experiential faith over book learning
a cultural shift that promoted Christianity among slave communities
the birth of an American identity, promoted by Benjamin Franklin
Answer:
The First Great Awakening was a Protestan revival that emphasized emotional, experiential faith over book learning.
Explanation:
The First Great Awakening was a movement of Christian revitalization that spread through Protestant Europe and British America, and especially the North American colonies in the 1730s and 1740s, leaving a permanent impact on American religion. It was the result of powerful preaching that gave listeners a sense of personal revelation of their need for salvation through Jesus Christ. Departing from rituals and ceremonies, the Great Awakening comprised an intensely personal Christianity for the common person by fostering a deep sense of spiritual conviction and redemption, and by fostering introspection and commitment to a new norm of personal morality.
Final answer:
The First Great Awakening was a Protestant revival in the 18th century, promoting emotional, experiential faith and personal salvation. It was different from the Enlightenment and contributed to the growth of the evangelical movement.
Explanation:
The First Great Awakening
The First Great Awakening was a Protestant revival that took place during the eighteenth century, particularly in the 1730s and 1740s. This revival emphasized an emotional, experiential faith rather than a focus on doctrine or book learning. It was a response to the perceived decline in religious piety and a departure from predestination, with evangelists preaching that personal salvation could be achieved through accepting Christ. Ministers from various Protestant denominations, including Congregationalists, Anglicans, and Presbyterians, were involved, spreading a message that appealed to women, young people, and those lower on the social spectrum.
Option B correctly defines the First Great Awakening as 'a Protestant revival that emphasized emotional, experiential faith over book learning'. It was one of the major cultural movements that solidified Anglo-American colonists' connections to Great Britain, distinct from the Enlightenment, which promoted reason and science.
Why was Rockefeller’s use of horizontal integration such an effective business tool at this time? Were his choices legal? Why or why not?
Answer: Horizontal integration enabled Rockefeller to gain tremendous control over the oil industry and use that power to influence vendors and competitors. For example, he could pressure railroads into giving him lower rates because of the volume of his products. He undercut competitors, forcing them to set their prices so low that they could barely stay in business—at which point he could buy them out. Through horizontal integration, he was able to create a virtual monopoly and set the terms for business. While his business model of a holding company was technically legal at that time, it held as much power as a monopoly and did not allow for other businesses to grow and compete.
Rockefeller's use of horizontal integration allowed him to control the petroleum industry.
While his methods would later be deemed unfair, there were no laws in place at the time making his actions illegal.
Explanation:Rockefeller's use of horizontal integration was an incredibly effective business tool at the time. Horizontal integration is where a business acquires or merges with its competitors in the same industry at the same point in the supply chain. This allowed Rockefeller to gain a monopoly over the petroleum industry, thereby controlling price and quality without competition.
As for the legality of his tactics, this was a grey area at the time. Many of his methods were later categorized as unfair business practices under antitrust laws. However, these laws were not in place at the time Rockefeller was building his empire, so technically, his actions were legal then.
Learn more about Rockefeller's Horizontal IntegrationThe domination of Texas politics by Republicans after the Civil War ended (a) with the election of governor Richard Coke in 1873. (b) with the victory of the Populist Party in 1892. (c) in 1888, with violent riots by farmers in Houston, Dallas, and Austin. (d) through a peaceful transfer of power in 1900.
The domination of Texas politics by Republicans after the Civil War ended with the election of Democrat Governor Richard Coke in 1873, signaling a century-long dominance of Democrats in the state. Hence the correct option is A.
Domination of Texas Politics by Republicans After the Civil War
The domination of Texas politics by Republicans after the Civil War ended with the election of Governor Richard Coke in 1873. This historical event marked a significant shift in political power within the state. Edmund J. Davis, of the Republican Party, had served as governor from 1870 until his defeat by Democrat Richard Coke. Davis's administration had faced widespread criticism and was marred by controversy, voter suppression, and corruption. The election of Coke was a response by many Texans against what they saw as the oppressive control of the Republican Party during Reconstruction. From 1874 through the late 1960s, Democrats dominated Texas politics, maintaining a firm grip on statewide offices and voting trends. The state had a white majority, and Democrats re-established their dominance post-Civil War, with Texas operating as a solidly one-party state under Democratic control. Notably, the Democratic Party remained in power for over a century, facing little to no challenge from the Republican Party, making it essentially impossible for Republicans to win any significant statewide races during that period.
The People's Party, also known as the Populist Party, attempted to have an impact during this era but never matched the influence of the Democratic Party. Although the Populists did manage some reforms, like the creation of the Railroad Commission to protect against extortionate transportation fees, this did not break the stronghold of the Democratic Party in Texas.
How could Spaniards obtain encomiendas?
by serving the Spanish crown
by buying them from other Spaniards
by buying them from native chiefs
by inheriting them
Spaniards obtain encomienda by serving the Spanish crown. The Spanish labor system was called encomienda. It compensated conquerors with the labor of particular groups of subject people. Although it was first established in Spain, it was applied on a much larger scale during the Spanish colonization of the Americas and the Philippines.
Spaniards could obtain encomiendas by serving the Spanish crown or inheriting them. The encomienda system was a royal grant that entitled the holder to extract labor or tribute from Indigenous populations, and it was not a commodity to be bought from others.
The encomienda was a system established by the Spanish crown during the colonization of the Americas. It was a grant that provided the holder, known as an encomendero, with the right to extract labor or tribute from Indigenous populations in a particular area. This system played a crucial role in the Spanish colonial economy and was deeply intertwined with the forced labor and abuse of native populations.
Encomiendas could be obtained by Spaniards primarily by serving the Spanish crown. The grants were issued as rewards for service to the crown in various capacities, including participation in the conquest and colonization of new territories. Some encomiendas were also inherited, which means they could be passed down from one encomendero to their descendants, perpetuating the system over generations.
Therefore, the correct answer to how Spaniards could obtain encomiendas is:
by serving the Spanish crownby inheriting themIt was not common practice to buy encomiendas from other Spaniards or from native chiefs, as the encomienda was a royal grant reflecting a system of privilege and reward in the context of Spanish colonial administration.
Why did many in the North resist the Fugitive Slave Act?
The Fugitive Act of 1850 was a law passed in the US that was a part of the Compromise of 1850. It required that all escaped slaves would be returned to their masters and officials and citizens had the duty to cooperate with that.
Many in the Northern States resist the act because they saw this as a proof that pro-slavery had more power than anti-slavery and that elite slaveowners had influence over the US.
They did not agree with the fact that they were compelled to serve as de facto slave-catchers since they would be punished if they did not help with fugitive slaves.
Northerners resisted the Fugitive Slave Act due to the perception of a "Slave Power" conspiracy, the Act's obligation to serve as de facto slave-catchers, a seen hypocrisy on the part of slaveholders, moral and ethical opposition to slavery, and economic concerns.
Explanation:Many people in the North resisted the Fugitive Slave Act due to various reasons. Among the most significant was the sense of a "Slave Power" conspiracy, where a minority of elite slaveholders seemed to wield disproportionate influence over the U.S. domestic policy. These Northerners felt that the Act forced them to become de facto slave-catchers, penalizing not only those who aided escaped slaves but also those who failed to assist in their recapture.
Furthermore, they perceived the Act as a apparent hypocrisy on the part of the slaveholders who, on one hand, advocated for states' rights and, on the other hand, leveraged federal power to perpetuate slavery. Instances such as the Anthony Burns case, where federal intervention was used to enforce the Act, amplified this view among Northerners and fueled resistance towards it.
Moreover, there was a profound moral and ethical opposition to slavery among many in the North, including abolitionists like Frederick Douglass, who believed in not just peaceful resistance but also violence to oppose the Act. Lastly, the economic implications of the Act, including the fear of competing with freed enslaved people for scarce jobs, also led to further resistance.
Learn more about Fugitive Slave Act here:https://brainly.com/question/29835611
#SPJ3
Which best represents the influence of Nietzsche's philosophy to literature? a. Stories in which the moral characters are rewarded. b. Stories where the evil characters prosper. c. Works of literature that are written purely for enjoyment, with no moral lesson. d. Plots that demonstrate no set rules of good and evil, where values are relative. e. Literature that is written to effect political or social change.
Answer:
A would be the answer to this question.
Explanation:
Nietzsche's philosophy dismisses traditional moral dichotomies, placing focus on the historical and societal evolution of these values instead. This gives room for the relativity of moral values, which has significantly influenced literature.
Explanation:The best representation of Nietzsche’s influence on literature would be d. Plots that demonstrate no set rules of good and evil, where values are relative.
Nietzsche engaged in a form of deconstruction he referred to as genealogy, where he traced moral concepts such as 'good' and 'evil' to their historical origins. Importantly, he held that the meaning of these terms had evolved over time - initially being used to describe the relations between the noble upper class and the common lower class, they were then repurposed by Judeo-Christian philosophy to degrade the strength of the nobility and favor the weakness of the masses. Consequently, Nietzsche’s philosophy disrupts the traditional moral dichotomies and introduces a space where moral values are relative. This relativity, or the lack of set rules of good and evil, has been significantly influential in several works of literature.
Learn more about Nietzsche's Influence on Literature here:https://brainly.com/question/32216493
#SPJ3
Which was not a provision of the Crittenden Compromise?
that the Five Civilized Tribes would be admitted into the Confederacy
that the 36°30′ line from the Missouri Compromise would be restored and extended
that Congress would be prohibited from abolishing slavery where it already existed
that the interstate slave trade would be allowed to continue
The first one.
That the Five Civilized Tribes would be admitted into the Confederacy.
The Crittenden Compromise did not include a provision that the Five Civilized Tribes would be admitted into the Confederacy. It included the restoration and extension of the 36°30′ line from the Missouri Compromise and allowed the interstate slave trade to continue.
Explanation:The provision that was not part of the Crittenden Compromise was that the 'Five Civilized Tribes would be admitted into the Confederacy.' The Crittenden Compromise, a last-ditch effort to prevent the Civil War, proposed the restoration and extension of the 36°30′ line from the Missouri Compromise, the interstate slave trade would be allowed to continue, and Congress would be prohibited from abolishing slavery where it already existed. However, it did not include any provisions relating to the status of the 'Five Civilized Tribes' and their admission into the Confederacy.
Learn more about Crittenden Compromise here:https://brainly.com/question/15797673
#SPJ6
The series of attempts by Christian armies to retake the Holy Lands from Muslims was known as ________.
the Crusades
the Reconquista
the Black Death
the Silk Road
Answer:
I think it is b wish it helps u
To what does the term “Restoration” refer?the restoration of New York to English power
the restoration of Catholicism as the official religion of England
the restoration of Charles II to the English throne
the restoration of Parliamentary power in England
The correct answer is C. The restoration of Charles II to the English throne
Explanation:
In English history, the Restoration began in 1660 and implied the return of Charles II as a king to the English throne as a result of restoring different monarchies including the Irish and Scottish under Charles II. This situation was mainly caused due to the Wars of the Three Kingdoms or the war that emerged between Englan, Ireland, and Scotland that led to the exile of Charles in 1646. However, on April of 1660 Charles II reclaimed the throne and this which was later approved by the Convention Parliament in Englan Additionally, this period also affect other fields including literature and art and reaffirmed the Protestantism in England. Therefore, the term Restoration refers to the restoration of Charles II to the English throne.
The term 'Restoration' refers to the period in English history from 1660 to 1685 when Charles II was restored to the throne, ending the Commonwealth period when England had no monarch. This era is notable for the revival of the arts, literature and the reshaping of the political structure.
Explanation:The term 'Restoration' is often used to refer specifically to the period in the history of England, Scotland, Wales, and Ireland from 1660 to 1685 when Charles II was restored to the throne, marking the end of the period known as The Interregnum, or The Commonwealth, when England had no monarch. It is a significant era, particularly in terms of cultural and political history.
The 'Restoration' was marked by change, particularly in political structure, and restoration of the monarchy. During this period, theatres reopened after having been closed during the protectorate of Oliver Cromwell, signaling a revival of the arts and literature, with comedy and satire becoming popular genres in theatre. This period also sounded the death knell for the Puritan influences, transformed the power dynamics between the monarchy and Parliament, and led to the evolution of the constitutional monarchy.
Therefore, while the term 'Restoration' could potentially refer to other historical restorations, in this particular context, it refers to the restoration of Charles II to the English throne.
Learn more about Restoration period here:https://brainly.com/question/33720385
#SPJ6
What evidence indicates that colonists continued to think of themselves as British subjects throughout this era? What evidence suggests that colonists were beginning to forge a separate, collective “American” identity? How would you explain this shift?
Answer:
Before the American Revolutionary War, and even a few years after that, many Americans still struggled with the idea of themselves as separate entities from the British crown, or seeing themselves as another thing than subjects to the British king. Proof of this was the difficulty that the rebelling colonists, like Washington, and others, had, to convince the everyday American that the Revolution was necessary. Many colonists even supported the British when they tried to stop the Revolution from happening. Some even supported the British cause. They wanted the injustices caused by the decisions made by the British Parliament and King George III to be taken back, but they did not consider themselves apart from Britain.
However, this did change as time went by, and as colonists like Benjamin Franklin, James Madison, and other such thinkers and influential Americans began to show the people the importance and the need for a separate nation from Britain. And supported by the anger in the colonies given the unjust taxes levied by the British crown on the American lands, people began to see themselves not just as non-British, but also, they began to develop their identities as Americans, and not as British subjects.
Colonial pride and a sense of identity as British subjects became tainted with resentment due to perceived abuses, leading to an increasing self-identification as 'Americans'. This shift in identity was significant in the history of the United States, ultimately culminating in the American Revolution and the declaration of independence from Britain.
Explanation:Evidence suggesting that colonists continued to think of themselves as British subjects includes their shared pride in being part of the British Empire, militarily, religiously, and politically. This is exemplified by the portrait of the Royall family that demonstrates their identity as proud and loyal British subjects, highlighting the tight-knit ties between Great Britain and the American colonies.
However, a shift in their perspective began as incidents such as the Proclamation of 1763, taxation without consent, and an attempt to interfere with self-government in the colonies convinced many of them that their contract with the British government had been broken. Their identification as 'American' began to strengthen as they saw their liberties being trampled upon.
These sentiments culminated into the American Revolution, dividing colonists into Loyalists and Patriots. Despite this rift, their sense of a distinctly 'American' identity only grew stronger, resulting in their declaration of independence from Britain in 1776.
Learn more about Shift in Colonial Identity here:https://brainly.com/question/31594164
#SPJ3
What were the consequences of the religious upheavals of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries?
The religious upheavals consequences of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries had very big impact on the people's live in Europe. Numerous conflicts emerged between the Catholics and Protestants, and that resulted in persecution, forced migration, lot of death. The Catholic Church was losing its power in multiple countries, and the Protestants were gaining more power, becoming dominant in those same countries. The tensions in Europe because of the religion led to migration of religious groups to the New World. The reason for migration toward the New World was that the church didn't really had any significant power there, and also there was plenty of space for creating communities, thus leave in peace and without fear.
The consequences of the religious upheavals in these periods are:
Research and Science was silencedThe church got dividedOne of the effects that the religious upheavals had was that catholic heads tried to silence the writers and scientists. Catholic beliefs were being disapproved by scientists.
Popular researches like Galileo were tried in the Tribunals for blasphemy due to their research findings.
Also the protestant reformation was also a consequence. A group of Christians led by Martin Luther rejected Catholic beliefs and doctrines. The group relied solely on the bible as the only main source of Christian authority.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/9370563?referrer=searchResults
To what extent did the Great Depression catalyze important changes in Americans’ perceptions of themselves, their national identity, and the role of their government? What evidence of these shifts can you find in the politics and values of our own times?
The Great Depression caused a devastation in social indicators, led to a decline in income and employment, and caused a deflationary process. The population that experienced the Great Depression called for changes that reversed the precariousness of the conditions of reproduction of life in the USA.
The human being has in his nature the tendency to crowd and help one another in situations of risk and calamity. The Great Depression awakened in Americans a sense of frustration and hope of reversing the bad situation. This was reflective in the election of Franklin Rosevelt, who promised a recovery plan, not only economic, but also social - through specific social policies. For example, the concept and establishment of social security for the elderly emerged, an achievement that highlights the importance of state action in social public policies. Since then, public policy for social benefit has become a value of the State and the population, which now requires greater transparency and direction in public spending.
The Great Depression brought significant changes in Americans' perceptions of themselves and their view of government. It catalyzed a shift towards recognizing the necessity of government involvement in economic regulation and social welfare. Today's politics, including government interventions in times of economic crises and provision of social welfare, is evidence of this shift.
Explanation:The Great Depression not only had profound economic impacts but also significantly affected the American psyche and the perception of the government. The Depression catalyzed important changes in Americans’ perceptions of themselves, their national identity, and the role of their government. At the onset of the great depression, there were few social safety nets in place to provide the necessary relief to those severely affected by it. This resulted in a shift in the American perception of the role of government, recognizing the need for economic regulation and social welfare, ushering in a permanent change to the political culture.
Everyday Americans severely felt the adversities of the depression with marked unemployment and poverty, forcing many into homelessness and job loss. The working class, farmers, and African Americans were amongst the worst affected. The impact on American values was profound with a decline in conspicuous consumption from the 1920s, replacing it with a conservation-minded approach. People cut back on their purchases leading to reduced business growth.Evidence of these shifts can be found in the politics of our times, the role of the government in providing social welfare and intervening in economic matters has significantly expanded since then.Learn more about Great Depression Influence here:https://brainly.com/question/11261737
#SPJ3
The Texas Constitution of 1876 was written to a. prevent a direct reflection of the difference in its framers’ underlying goals. b. create a government that could act effectively in the public welfare in a variety of policy areas. c. overcome the liabilities of the Articles of Confederation. d. prevent the expansion of governmental authority that was perceived as acting against the interest of the people.
The Texas Constitution of 1876 was primarily written to prevent the expansion of governmental authority and return power to the people, reflecting a response to earlier state government excesses.
The Texas Constitution of 1876 was written with the primary intention of preventing the expansion of governmental authority that the framers perceived as acting against the interests of the people. Given the historical context, where the administration of Governor E. J. Davis (1870 to 1874) was seen as corrupt, scandalous, and repressive, the framers sought to create a constitutionally weak governor, restricting the state government power comprehensively. This effort was to ensure that the government could not easily gain excessive control and power over the citizens. The Texas Constitution of 1876 introduced measures such as limiting regulatory power over business, local control, and imposing limitations on spending, which reflect an agrarian-based mindset, expected from a state whose vast majority lived on farms or ranches at that time. The framers also took steps to establish a common school system and centralized law enforcement, which, despite the criticisms, laid the groundwork for a strong educational system and strengthened the governance model in Texas. The desire to return power back to the people was evident in the overarching theme of this constitution.
Which man was both a professional baseball player and an influential evangelist during the 1920s?
Babe Ruth
H. L. Mencken
Jim Thorpe
Billy Sunday
Billy Sunday was both a professional baseball player and an influential evangelist during the 1920s.
Who was Billy Sunday ?William Ashley "Billy" Sunday, an American outfielder in baseball's National League, was born on November 19, 1862, and died on November 6, 1935. He is regarded as the most significant evangelist in the United States during the first two decades of the 20th century. He was able to play baseball in the major leagues for eight years thanks to his speed and agility. He was an average hitter and a good fielder who was recognised for his base running. Sunday quit baseball for the Christian ministry after converting to evangelical Christianity in the 1880s. In the Midwest, he steadily honed his abilities as a pulpit preacher, and in the early 20th century, he became most famous evangelist.
What does is mean by Evangelist ?Preaching, proclaiming, or otherwise sharing the good news of salvation is known as evangelism. Getting across the idea that Jesus Christ is not only the Son of God but also gave His life as a burnt offering for our sins. He ensured that everybody who believes will have eternal life as a result.
hence option D, is correct.
to learn more about Billy Sunday here
https://brainly.com/question/13823551
#SPJ2
Explain what this document tells you about life in the United States during the early 1800s.
Answer:
Explanation:
Base on the question, I would say that US wanted to group the Native American in communities so that the rest of the US could freely expands West ward, life was anti - Native American. I hope that you are satisfied with my answer and feel free to ask for more if you have further clarification
The early 19th century US experienced transformative expansion, industrialization, and social change, including the westward movement after the Louisiana Purchase, the rise of industrial and plantation economies, and culminating in the Civil War and the abolition of slavery.
Life in the Early 1800s United States
The early 1800s in the United States was a period of significant change and expansion. The Louisiana Purchase in 1803 doubled the size of the nation and kicked off a westward movement of the population. As the frontier advanced, Native American tribes were forcibly removed from their lands, which often led to devastating consequences for these communities.
This era was also the dawn of the Industrial Age. Technological advancements and industrialization transformed the economy, particularly with the growth of large plantations, railroads, and factories. With this economic growth came the exploitation of labor, which included both the slave labor in the South and the factory workers in the North. The stark contrast between industrial and agricultural economies contributed to regional tensions that eventually erupted into the Civil War.
What were some of the main differences among the non-Spanish colonies?
Final answer:
The main differences among the non-Spanish colonies include colonization, governance, land arrangements, and relationships with indigenous peoples.
Explanation:
The main differences among the non-Spanish colonies can be seen in the areas of colonization, governance, land arrangements, and relationships with indigenous peoples. Unlike the Spanish who included the indigenous in their colonial project and tolerated them as long as they paid tribute and pretended to be Catholic, the British colonists saw the indigenous peoples as obstacles and pushed them out of their lands. The British settlers preferred individual family farms while the Spanish relied on large landowners who employed indigenous and mestizo workers. Additionally, the British colonists established legislatures and made their own laws, while the Spanish directly ruled their colonies and appointed trusted men to govern.
The demonstrations at Kent State University in May 1970 were held to protest what event?
the My Lai massacre
the North Vietnamese invasion of Saigon
the invasion of Cambodia by U.S. forces
the signing of a peace agreement with North Vietnam
The correct answer is C. The invasion of Cambodia by U.S. forces
Explanation:
On May 4th of 1970 students from Kent State University in Ohio gathered to protest against the United States military forces as the U.S. had bombed and invaded Cambodia which had been announced by Richard Nixon as part of the Vietnam War many U.S. citizens already opposed, because of this the invasion of Cambodia made meany including the student of this university to organize protests. Additionally, this protest led to the death of four students and many others were injured the National Guard decided to shot against the crowd of students incident that was known as Myas 4 massacre. Therefore, the demonstrations at Kent State University in May 1970 were held do protest against the invasion of Cambodia by U.S. forces.
The Kent State University demonstrations in May 1970 were in protest of the U.S. invasion of Cambodia, an expansion of the Vietnam War announced by President Nixon.
Explanation:The demonstrations at Kent State University in May 1970 were held to protest the invasion of Cambodia by U.S. forces. On April 30, 1970, President Nixon announced this expansion of the Vietnam War, and the action immediately sparked widespread protests across the country. At Kent State University, what began as a peaceful protest against this invasion turned tragic on May 4, when Ohio National Guardsmen opened fire on the demonstrators, resulting in the death of four students in an event that has come to be known as the Kent State Massacre or Kent State Riot, depending on perspective.
What was the most lucrative product of the Chesapeake colonies?
corn
tobacco
gold and silver
slaves
Answer:
Tobacco.
Explanation:
The Chesapeake region encompassing the colonies of Virginia and Maryland it's economics develope is referred to the agriculture in which cash crops like tobacco and others were cultivated for trade.
There were others products like indigo and cotton but the most relevant was the Tobacco.
Tobacco was the most lucrative product of the Chesapeake colonies, outstripping other agricultural products and exports in economic importance and driving the region's growth and development.
Explanation:The most lucrative product of the Chesapeake colonies was tobacco. Although the early Virginians initially hoped to find gold and silver, they quickly learned that tobacco cultivation was the most reliable way to generate wealth. This was especially true in Virginia and Maryland where tobacco became an economic cornerstone. As the demand for tobacco grew in Europe, colonists expanded plantations and the crop became indispensable for the colony’s economic survival and success. Despite the cultivation of other crops like wheat, corn, flax, and hemp, none were as profitable as tobacco, which was highly sought after in European markets.
The burgeoning tobacco economy also shaped the social and labor structures in the colonies, leading to the use of indentured servants and later, enslaved people to meet the labor demands of tobacco farming. However, regarding the question's choices, tobacco remains the correct answer as it was the prime commodity exported to Europe, encouraging economic growth and attracting more settlers to the colonies.
Learn more about lucrative product of the Chesapeake colonies here:https://brainly.com/question/12881295
#SPJ6
Which one of the following was true of French relations with Native Americans? The French appropriated significant amounts of land for fur trading. The French were proud that they were considered tougher on Indians than their English and Spanish counterparts. The French sent nuns to try to Christianize the natives, because they understood that gender relations were different among Native Americans than they were among whites. Native Americans resented that the French had no need for their help in the fur trade. Jesuit missionaries tried to convert Native Americans, but gave them far more independence than did Spanish missionaries.
Answer:
the answer is Jesuit missionaries tried to convert Native Americans, but gave them far more independence than did Spanish missionaries.
Explanation:
i know it is right
Final answer:
The French formed close, mutually beneficial relationships with Native Americans; through intermarriage, fur trade alliances, and Jesuit missionaries who practiced cultural accommodation, they maintained friendlier and more respectful interactions than their European counterparts.
Explanation:
The French established sympathetic relationships with Native Americans that were more humane and rooted in mutual respect than those of the English or Spanish. They fostered alliances through the fur trade, often relying on Native American knowledge and expertise, and some colonists intermarried with Native American women, leading to a multicultural society. Additionally, French Jesuit missionaries who arrived to convert the indigenous peoples practiced cultural accommodation, allowing Natives to maintain their way of life, so long as they adopted Catholicism. These dynmaics led to strong relationships, especially with Algonquin-speaking tribes and allowed for a unique French influence on North American culture.
How did President Jackson respond to Congress’s re-chartering of the Second Bank of the United States?
He vetoed it.
He gave states the right to implement it or not.
He signed it into law.
He wrote a counterproposal.
Answer:
He vetoed it.
Explanation:
The Second Bank of the US was created in 1816 because the First Bank’s charter expired and there was no central bank to regulate state banks.
Because of that, the US Congress passed a law that chartered the Second Bank of the US, it was created to help the national treasury.
President Jackson vetoed the recharter of the Second Bank, he believed that this institution endangered the foundations of American liberty and democracy because it encouraged imbalance of power between rich and poor.
was Johnson’s program to provide federal funding for healthcare for the poor.
Medicare
Social Security
Medicaid
AFDC
Final answer:
Johnson's program for federal healthcare funding for the poor is called Medicaid, established in 1965 to help low-income families, elderly, and disabled individuals.
Explanation:
Lyndon B. Johnson's program to provide federal funding for healthcare for the poor was known as Medicaid. Created in 1965 as part of Johnson's Great Society initiatives, Medicaid is a federal and state program that provides health insurance to low-income Americans, including families with children, the elderly, and the disabled.
In response to the growing needs of the nation's poor, the Johnson administration aimed to reduce poverty through a range of programs, with Medicaid targeting the healthcare needs of those with limited financial resources.
Why was prohibition’s success short-lived?
Answer:
The people running illegal alcohol operations had plenty of money with which to pay such bribes. Because there were few federal agents, and because local police were often easily bribed, the law was not enforced very strongly. Finally, Prohibition failed because it gave rise to tremendous amounts of organized crime
Explanation:
Prohibition was deemed a short-lived success due to widespread noncompliance, the rise of organized crime, and negative social and legal consequences, leading to its repeal.
Prohibition's success was short-lived primarily because it attempted to legislate morality against the wishes of many Americans, resulting in widespread disregard for the law.
This was compounded by the law's poor enforcement and the subsequent rise of organized crime, which took advantage of the public's continued demand for alcohol. Bootleggers and speakeasies proliferated, and illegal alcohol sometimes caused severe illness and death due to lack of regulation. Overall, Prohibition was deemed a triumphant failure because it led to more harm than good, including criminal activity, violence, corruption, and an overstretched criminal justice system.