Answer:
Nathanael Greene.
Explanation:
The General Nathanael Greene was born in 1781.
He was the commander in chief of the southern army.
The mayor General Nathanael Greene of the American was General Revolution George Washington's most trusted General.
After the horrific defeat of General Horatio Gates by the British at Camden, South Carolina, on August 16th, 1780 Alexander Hamilton said, "For God's sake, overcome prejudice and send Greene." Someone must have listened for indeed Major General Nathanael Greene was appointed commander of the Southern Campaign.
Which of the following protests was directly related to federal policies, and thus had the greatest impact in creating a negative public perception of the Hoover presidency?
the Farm Holiday Association
the Ford Motor Company labor strikes
the Bonus Expeditionary Force
the widespread appearance of “Hooverville” shantytowns
Answer:
The Bonus Expeditionary Force.
Explanation:
They were a group of 43,000 marchers, some of them veterans of World War I who gathered in Washington D.C. in 1932 to demand the payment of their service certificates.
The name was given by the organizers as a reference to the American Expeditionary Forces. The media called them Bonus Marchers. The manifestation was supposed to be in peace, but when the Washington police attempt to remove the veterans after being ordered to do that by the Attorney General they resist. That lead to Hoover´s decision of sending the army to clear the marchers' campsite. It was considered politically disastrous to Hoover and was a contributing factor to the victory of Roosevelt in the 1932 election.
I hope this answer helps you.
A proposal to prohibit the importation of slaves to Missouri following its admission to the United States was made by ________.
John C. Calhoun
Henry Clay
James Tallmadge
John Quincy Adams
The answer is C, James Tallmadge.
Final answer:
The proposal to prohibit the importation of slaves to Missouri was made by James Tallmadge, an anti-slavery representative from New York. The Tallmadge Amendment sparked significant debate, leading to the Missouri Compromise of 1820.
Explanation:
The proposal to prohibit the importation of slaves to Missouri upon its admission to the United States was made by James Tallmadge, an anti-slavery representative from New York. In 1819, as part of the debate over Missouri's entrance to the Union as a potential slave state, Tallmadge introduced a measure that sought not just to stop further importation of slaves into Missouri but also to gradually emancipate the slaves already there. This proposal, known as the Tallmadge Amendment, was a point of contention as it shifted the conversation around Missouri's statehood to focus on the morality and future of slavery in new states.
The House of Representatives supported statehood for Missouri only if the amendment was included, whereas the Senate was willing to allow Missouri as a slave state without such a condition. This polarization led to a stalemate between the two chambers of Congress. Eventually, a compromise known as the Missouri Compromise of 1820, led by Henry Clay, was reached, allowing Missouri to enter as a slave state and Maine as a free state, maintaining the Senate balance.
When Abel is introduced to a study-abroad student who bows instead of shaking hands, Abel decides to try bowing as a way to adjust to meet the need of the situation. We should congratulate Abel for doing a good job at which criterion of flexible intercultural communication?
Final answer:
Abel exhibits flexible intercultural communication by adapting to the nonverbal greeting ritual of bowing, showing a high degree of intercultural communication competence.
Explanation:
We should congratulate Abel for doing a good job at the criterion of flexible intercultural communication when he adapts to the study-abroad student's cultural practice of bowing instead of shaking hands. In engaging in a nonverbal greeting ritual more common in Asian cultures, Abel displays a high degree of intercultural communication competence (ICC), which is necessary for effective cross-cultural interactions. By choosing to bow, Abel honors the behaviors of a noncontact culture, like Japan, and shows respect for the other's cultural norms and social etiquette regarding status and greeting rituals. This ability to adapt behavior in a manner consistent with cultural understanding is crucial in our globalized world and is characteristic of someone with high ICC.
What effect did industrialization have on consumers?
Answer:
It increased their monetary power
Explanation:
Industrialization made fabricated products progressively plentiful and broadly accessible. Everything except the least fortunate Americans had the option to upgrade their homes with parlor stoves, upholstered furniture, adornments, and cookstoves. Indeed, even already costly products, for example, clocks, were at a reasonable price after the industrialization.
What was the role of the Taft Commission?
Answer:
The answer to the question: What was the role of the Taft Commission, would be: to legislate for the then known Philippine Islands, that were under the control of the United States, during the Philippine-American war.
Explanation:
The Second Commission, also known as the Taft Commission after its first leader, William Howard Taft, was in function in the Philippiness, then known only as the Philippine Islands, under control of the United States, as the sole legislative body, responsible for the establishment of all the laws in the region, from 1900, when it was set up by President William McKinley, till 1916, when it was replaced. This Comission also received some executive powers, but mostly its role was legislative and it fell under its jurisdiction to also establish the Supreme Court and the whole judicial system, and law codes for the Philippiness.
The Taft Commission, led by William Howard Taft, worked to implement vital reforms in the Philippines while managing international issues such as Central American debts and Asian power dynamics. Taft's measures were critical in modernizing local governance, maintaining regional power balances, and avoiding potential European military interventions.
Explanation:The Taft Commission, named after William Howard Taft who later became the U.S. President but at the time was serving as the governor of the Philippines following the Spanish-American War, played a crucial role in introducing and managing reforms in the Philippines. Predominantly, these reforms sought to modernize and advance day-to-day life, often through legislative changes which redefined local government structures. Significantly, to gain the backing of opposition leaders, the Taft Commission offered them political appointments, which helped in smoothening the reform process.
Furthermore, Taft's policies not only reflected domestically but also had international implications. For instance, to prevent potential European military interference in the Western Hemisphere, Taft swiftly repaid several Central American nations' debts to European countries, replacing them with U.S. loans. This approach sometimes required military intervention when a country resisted American financial control, as seen in Nicaragua's case.
In Asia, Taft sought to reinforce China's ability to withstand Japanese interference, thereby hoping to maintain a balance of power in the region. However, he was met with resistance when attempting to expand the Open Door policy, exposing the limitations of U.S. influence and foreign policy knowledge. This led to the restructuring of the U.S. State Department to better navigate foreign relations complexities.
Learn more about Taft Commission here:https://brainly.com/question/12879320
#SPJ3
How did Alexis de Tocqueville react to his visit to the United States? What impressed and what worried him?
Alexis de Tocqueville was impressed by the democratic ideals and social mobility in the United States, but he had concerns about the potential for tyranny of the majority and the existence of slavery.
Explanation:Alexis de Tocqueville was a French political thinker and historian who traveled to the United States in the early 19th century. He was impressed by the American society's emphasis on equality and democracy, as well as the opportunities for social mobility. Tocqueville also admired the strong sense of community and voluntary associations among Americans.
However, Tocqueville was also worried about the potential for tyranny of the majority in a democratic society. He was concerned that individual rights and freedoms could be threatened by the power of the majority. Tocqueville also observed the negative consequences of slavery in America, seeing it as a contradiction to the principles of liberty and equality.
In summary, Tocqueville was impressed by the democratic ideals and social mobility in the United States, but he also had concerns about the potential for tyranny of the majority and the existence of slavery.
Learn more about Alexis de Tocqueville's visit to the United States here:https://brainly.com/question/28382993
#SPJ6
Alexis de Tocqueville, a French aristocrat, expressed admiration for the American democratic system of equality before the law during his visit to the US, but he also expressed concerns about potential overreach by the majority, leading to what he called 'the tyranny of the majority'. His analysis and insights were published in a two-part work, 'Democracy in America'.
Explanation:The French aristocrat Alexis de Tocqueville was sent by the French government to the United States to report on American prison reforms and the prevailing democratic spirit. During his visit, Tocqueville was impressed by the spirit of democracy and the equality before the law that he observed. However, he also expressed concerns about the negative aspects of democracy, such as the tyranny of the majority, which he perceived as overpowering the will of individuals and minorities.
In his well-known work Democracy in America, published in two parts in 1835 and 1840, Tocqueville analyzed the transformation through which America was going. This detailed account illustrates his belief that democracy was an unstoppable force that would eventually overthrow monarchy around the world.
Tocqueville was also concerned about the rise of democracy in the United States, and the potential for the majority to silence the minority. The escalation of democratic principles raised questions about the security of the rights of those who oppose the majority. Tocqueville's visit, observations, and concerns all make significant contributions to our present understanding of democracy and its consequences.
Learn more about Alexis de Tocqueville's visit to America here:https://brainly.com/question/30577373
#SPJ6
What were some of the primary values of the Moral Majority?
Answer:
Moral Majority is a United States political organization of ultraconservative and Christian fundamentalist orientation, which functions as a lobby. It was founded by Jerry Falwell in 1979. It is closely linked to televangelists and supported by the right wing of the Republican Party. It reached its greatest influence in the federal government during the presidencies of Ronald Reagan, George Bush Sr. and George Bush Jr. It is considered one of the essential components of the so-called New Right or New Christian Right.
At its peak, Moral Majority reached four million affiliates in 27 state organizations (the largest in the state of Washington) and two million donors.
Although nominally founded in 1979, it was dissolved in 1989, and consolidated in 2004, the maintenance of its identity and the activity of the people and groups identified with it has been a constant, being at the root of later movements, such as the Tea Party Movement or the self-styled alternative right.
Which of the following phrases best characterizes Herbert Hoover’s foreign policy agenda?
interventionist, in terms of unwanted interference in other nations’ affairs
militaristic, in terms of strengthening American armed forces
isolationist, in terms of preventing America’s interaction with other nations
mutual respect, in terms of being available to support others when called upon, but not interfering unnecessarily in their affairs
Answer:
The correct answer choice for the question: Which of the following phrases best characterizes Herbert Hoover´s foreign policy agenda, would be: the last one: Mutual respect, in terms of being available to support others when called upon, but not interfering unnecessarily in their affairs.
Explanation:
Herbert Hoover served as the 31st president of the United States from 1929 to 1933, and he faced one of the toughest economical debacles in all of history. Although highly criticized later for the inefficient ways in which he was perceived to have acted to stop the domino effects of the Great Depression, there is one thing that can be said about him; he definitely believed in non-interventionism, whether on internal affairs, or foreign affairs. In foreign relations, Hoover was responsible for stepping down from intervening anymore in Latin American affairs, and also, as events that led to World War II, on events that took place in Asia. However, he was also always ready to act if needed; thus, he was not above threatening to intervene militarily in the Dominican Republic, and other such places. This is why the last option is the best one to describe this character´s international agenda.
Herbert Hoover's foreign policy agenda is best characterized as a stance based on 'mutual respect'; he encouraged noninterference but was open to providing assistance to other nations when requested.
Explanation:The best phrase that characterizes Herbert Hoover's foreign policy agenda is mutual respect, in terms of being available to support others when called upon, but not interfering unnecessarily in their affairs. During his presidency from 1929 to 1933, Hoover promoted the stance of nonintervention and adhered to the idea that America should not impose its will on other nations, except when approached for assistance.
While some may view these policies as isolationist, it is more accurate to describe Hoover's approach as one based on mutual respect and a commitment to non-interference. It differed from true isolationism as Hoover maintained that the U.S. should assist other nations when help is requested, thereby allowing them to partake in international diplomatic and economic relations without disrupting their sovereignty.
Learn more about Herbert Hoover's foreign policy here:https://brainly.com/question/29546713
#SPJ3
What was the actual result of Jackson’s policy of “rotation in office”?
an end to corruption in Washington
a replacement of Adams’s political loyalists with Jackson’s political loyalists
the filling of government posts with officials the people chose themselves
the creation of the Kitchen Cabinet
Answer:
A replacement of Adams's political loyalists with Jackson's political loyalists
Explanation:
President Andrew Jackson invoked the rotation in federal office as a principle, he defended that “no one man has any more intrinsic right to office than another”. But the actual result of this policy was that he cleansed the federal civil service from John Quincy Adam’s appointees and replaced them for his own.
This rotation occurred in many places, including civil servants in the states and communities and land offices.
What purpose did the Neutrality Act and Jay's Treaty have toward the relationship between the United States and Great Britain? (5 points) The documents harmed their relationship due to ties to France. The documents outlined rules for trade agreements. The documents put to final rest all issues between the countries. The documents prevented a new outbreak of war.
Jay's Treaty aimed at resolving issues after the American Revolution, facilitating trade and diplomatic relations between U.S. and Britain, while the Neutrality Acts were designed to prevent the U.S. involvement in global conflicts by imposing limitations on trade and travel.
Explanation:The Neutrality Act and Jay's Treaty both held notable purposes related to the relationship between the United States and Great Britain. Jay's Treaty, negotiated in 1794 by Supreme Court Justice John Jay, aimed to resolve issues lingering after the American Revolution. While not all issues were addressed - impressment of American sailors by the British navy remained a significant problem - the treaty did facilitate trade, with Britain agreeing to abandon frontier posts and permit American ships to engage in trade in the West Indies.
The Neutrality Acts were enacted by the U.S. Congress in the 1930s with the main goal of preventing America's involvement in another global war after World War I. The Acts aimed to isolate the U.S. from international conflicts by imposing strict regulations on trade and loans to belligerent countries, and by restricting travel of American citizens to warring nations. These legislations represented a significant attempt to maintain peace and safeguard American interests during a period of global instability.
Learn more about U.S.-British Diplomacy here:https://brainly.com/question/351223
#SPJ12
Why do historians refer to the election of Thomas Jefferson as the Revolution of 1800?
Many historians refer to the election of Thomas Jefferson in 1800s as “The Revolution of 1800” because it was the first time that power in America changed from one party to another.
This marked US politics as a two-party system, despite the fact that many of them believed that the appearance of parties could do more harm than good. Because of those critics, Jefferson promised to govern as the Founders intended.
Why might President Truman have made the decision to drop the second atomic bomb on Nagasaki?
Dropping the atomic bombs was a way of demonstrating America's power. Also, the Japanese refused to surrender after the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima so the President was following through on his threat.
Hope this helps!!
Describe the philosophy of Manifest Destiny. What effect did it have on Americans’ westward migration? How might the different groups that migrated have sought to apply this philosophy to their individual circumstances?
Answer:
In the nineteenth century, the doctrine of Manifest Destiny was a common belief among the inhabitants of the United States that American colonizers should expand in North America, from the Atlantic to the Pacific. It expressed the belief that the American people were elected by God to civilize their continent.
The Manifest Destiny was not a thesis embraced by all American society. The differences within the country itself about the objective and consequences of the policy of expansion determined its acceptance or resistance.
The northeastern states believed for the most part that the United States should take its concept of "civilization" throughout the continent through territorial expansion. In addition, for US commercial interests, the expansion offered large and lucrative access to foreign markets and thus allowed to compete in better conditions with the British. Having ports in the Pacific would facilitate trade with Asia.
The southern states sought to extend slavery. New slave states would strengthen the power of the south in Washington and would also serve to place the growing slave population.
This north-south conflict became clear with the question of Texas's entry into the Union and was one of the main causes of the future Civil War.
There were also political groups that saw the excessive territorial extension as dangerous; they believed that their political system and the formation of a nation would be difficult to apply in such a vast territory. This position was defended as much by some leaders of the Whigs as by some expansionist Republican-Democrats, who argued about how much territory should be acquired.
Another point of discussion was the use of force. Some political leaders (whose maximum exponent was James K. Polk) did not hesitate to try to annex the largest possible territory even at the risk of triggering wars (as in fact happened) with other nations. Others opposed (albeit timidly) the use of force, on the grounds that the benefits of their system alone would suffice for the territories to join voluntarily.
It can be said that the own supporters of the "Manifest Destiny" formed a heterogeneous group with different interests.
The philosophy of Manifest Destiny was a belief that American expansion across North America was preordained and beneficial. It led to westward migration as Americans sought land, resources, and the spread of their ideals. Different groups, including settlers, missionaries, and politicians, variously interpreted and applied this belief to justify expansionist policies and actions.
This idea embodied a belief in American cultural and racial superiority, suggesting that American expansion was inevitable and beneficial for all. This belief was used to justify the annexation of land, often at the expense of Native American tribes and other nations such as Mexico.
Manifest Destiny had a profound effect on Americans' westward migration. It was seen as a call to action that drove settlers to move westward in search of new opportunities, land, and a desire to spread American ideals. The philosophy pushed for territorial expansion and played a significant role in the acquisition of territories, such as through the Oregon Treaty and the Mexican-American War, which resulted in large-scale migration and settlement into new western territories.
The different groups migrating westward applied the philosophy of Manifest Destiny to their individual circumstances in various ways. Settlers seeking economic opportunities believed they were fated to utilize the land's resources, while missionaries saw it as an opportunity to spread their religious beliefs. Some Americans, like Senator Thomas Hart Benton, used Manifest Destiny to argue the moral righteousness of American expansion, while others used it as a pretext for the systemic dispossession and harsh treatment of indigenous peoples and non-American settlers.
Where did the Protestant Reformation begin?
Northern Europe
Spain
England
the American colonies
Answer: Northern Europe
Explanation: The Protestant Reformation was a movement within the Catholic Church primarily led by Martin Luther and then John Calvin. Everything started in Germany in 16th century, when Martin Luther raised the issue of forgiving sins by the Church with monetary compensation and many other irregularities and deviations from the original teachings. His intention is to reform within the Church itself in the form of 95 theses, but he was therefore thrown out, and thus a movement was created with the goal of a major religious, political and social change under the guidance of Martin Luther, called Protestantism or Lutheranism. This is considered one of the great revolutions within the Church or the religious revolution. Later, this movement expanded widely in Northern Europe.
Final answer:
The Protestant Reformation began in Northern Europe in the early 16th century, originating from Martin Luther's criticisms of the Roman Catholic Church.
Explanation:
The Protestant Reformation began in the early 16th century primarily in Northern Europe. It originated from criticisms made by Martin Luther, a German theologian, against the Roman Catholic Church. Luther's publication of the Ninety-Five Theses in 1517 marked the beginning of the Reformation. He protested against what he perceived as corruption and the sale of indulgences within the church.
Luther's ideas quickly gained traction and led to his excommunication, but they also inspired others across Europe, such as Ulrich Zwingli and John Calvin in Switzerland. The movement led to the creation of many new branches of Christianity outside of Roman Catholicism, forming the basis for numerous Protestant denominations like Baptists, Lutherans, and Calvinists.
What were the circumstances that led to Shays’ Rebellion? What was the government’s response? Would this response have confirmed or negated the grievances of the participants in the uprising? Why?
Answer:
In 1780, the Boston financiers and shipowners used the state constitution to reserve the right to vote only to the owners. Controlling the legislature, they levied various taxes for the repayment of the debts of the war against Great Britain, and pursued lawsuits against the largely ruined civilians in western Massachusetts.
At the end of the war of independence, the thirteen newly independent colonies were in a difficult situation. Many citizens got into debt during the conflict. However, independence had resulted in a contraction of trade between the West Indies and the port of Boston. English manufacturers, as soon as the peace returned, put pressure on governments to ensure that importers in Massachusetts accomplished their claims. These blow harassed retailers who did the same with farmers. The difficulties of the indebted citizens were all the greater as the creditors demanded to be paid in metallic money (gold, silver or copper) and refused paper money, payments in kind or title deeds. At first, the peasants asked the state to compel the creditors to accept the paper money but the Massachusetts assembly refused. Taken by the throat, some citizens revolted, led by Daniel Shays.
Daniel Shays was a farm worker in western Massachusetts. He joined the revolutionary troops in 1775. He ended the war with the rank of captain. After his demobilization in 1780, he had to wait a long time for his payment. But very quickly, his debts increased, and the bitterness of having fought for a republic which gave him nothing grew up.
The rebels were small farmers revolted by their debt and the increase in taxes. They formed a militia of 1,200 men, and attacked Springfield in January 1787. They also launched a campaign of intimidation against traders in western Massachusetts.
Massachusetts asked for help in Congress. Most states, however, refused to mobilize the resources necessary to suppress the revolt by individual selfishness. Massachusetts formed a state militia under the leadership of Benjamin Lincoln. To cope, the rebels sought to seize the federal arsenal of Springfield that would provide them with all the weapons they needed. But Lincoln's militia was faster than them and took control of the arsenal. The rebels were finally beaten and then sentenced to death and amnestied.
Shays' Rebellion was an uprising by indebted farmers led by Daniel Shays. The initially weak response of the government, due to the limitations of the Articles of Confederation, eventually led to the quelling of the uprising by a privately funded militia. The rebellion itself prompted calls for a stronger national government and influenced the drafting of the US Constitution.
Explanation:The circumstances leading to Shays’ Rebellion were complex and multi-faceted. In the summer of 1786, farmers in western Massachusetts, many of whom were veterans of the Revolutionary War, found themselves heavily indebted, facing imprisonment and the loss of their lands. They had unpaid taxes from while they were away fighting the British during the Revolution, and despite promises from the Continental Congress, the national government did not have sufficient funds to pay them for their service.
Unable to meet their tax burdens, the farmers, led by Daniel Shays, marched to a local courthouse demanding relief. Initially, the government was unable to respond due to the inability to raise an army under the weak Articles of Confederation. Governor James Bowdoin of Massachusetts called upon the national government for aid, but none was forthcoming. So the government’s response was to raise a privately-funded militia which quelled the rebellion the following year after the protestors’ unsuccessful raid at the Springfield Armory.
Shays’ Rebellion had an impact on the perception of democratic impulses and the governance of the United States. It was seen by men of property, chiefly conservative Whigs, as an indication of the republic descending into anarchy and chaos. It convinced figures such as George Washington and Alexander Hamilton of the need to amend the Articles of Confederation, which they saw as woefully inadequate in the face of such uprisings. This led to the call for a convention, subsequent drafting of the US Constitution, and the strengthening of the central government.
Learn more about Rebellion :https://brainly.com/question/13938004
#SPJ3
What steps did Kennedy take to combat Communism?
President Kennedy combated Communism through the Bay of Pigs Invasion, establishing the Alliance for Progress and the Peace Corps, providing support to democratic European nations, sending military advisors to Vietnam, and navigating the Cuban Missile Crisis.
President John F. Kennedy took several significant steps to combat Communism during his presidency. Among his strategies was the botched Bay of Pigs Invasion, where he authorized a CIA-led force of Cuban exiles to attempt to overthrow Fidel Castro's Communist regime in Cuba. Additionally, Kennedy aimed to counter Soviet influence globally through initiatives like the Alliance for Progress, which promoted economic growth and social stability in Latin America, and the founding of the Peace Corps, which sent volunteers to carry out humanitarian projects in developing countries.
In Europe and Asia, Kennedy's approaches varied. In Europe, he favored rebuilding the economy with a focus on democratic institutions, as seen in the post-war support to West Germany. Conversely, in Asia, Kennedy increased U.S. presence in Vietnam by sending thousands of military advisors to counteract perceived Communist threats. Kennedy's policies also extended to domestic affairs, wherein the struggle for civil rights was partly framed as a means to improve the U.S.'s international image in the face of Communist propaganda.
During the Cuban Missile Crisis, Kennedy successfully navigated one of the most critical standoffs of the Cold War by demanding the removal of Soviet missiles from Cuba and imposing a naval quarantine around the island. Additionally, he sought to present the U.S. as a bastion of freedom and democracy by pushing for civil rights reforms, whicg was also a tactic to diminish Soviet claims of moral superiority due to racial discrimination in the U.S.
In what ways did the New Deal both provide direct relief and create new jobs? Which programs served each of these goals?
The New Deal was a series of measures and projects enacted during the Great Depression (The worst economic downturn of America) that aimed to restore public confidence in the banking system, to provide relief to those most in need (like the elderly and the poor), to employ millions of Americans, to reform infrastructure, to regulate the economy and others.
The New Deal both provided direct relief and created new jobs through the establishment of government agencies, some of them were: 1) the Civilian Conservation Corps (1933) that gave millions of young men employment on environmental projects that, among others, included the plantation of trees and construction of trails and shelters for those homeless; 2) the Works Progress Administration (1935) that employed mostly unskilled men to carry out public works projects, such as the construction of public buildings and roads that benefited the whole society; 3) and the Tennessee Valley Authority (1933) that provided jobs to people and brought electricity to the rural Tennessee River Valley, operated the hydroelectric Wilson Dam, improved the navigability of the Tennessee River and developed the agriculture, commerce and industry in the region.
The New Deal, led by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, provided direct relief through federally funded initiatives like the Wagner-Peyser Act and the Federal Emergency Relief Act while creating jobs using programs such as the Civil Works Administration and the Public Works Administration. It offered hope during the Great Depression, but it also faced legal challenges, as seen with the National Recovery Administration.
Explanation:The New Deal was a comprehensive series of federal initiatives enacted under President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) with the aim of providing direct relief to Americans suffering during the Great Depression, as well as creating jobs to reboot the economy. Two central pieces of legislation that illustrate these efforts were the Wagner-Peyser Act and the Federal Emergency Relief Act (FERA). The Wagner-Peyser Act established the United States Employment Service, which encouraged states to create job opportunities with the promise of federal matching funds. Likewise, through FERA, $500 million in direct grants was distributed to states to support relief agencies, significantly aiding the nearly fifteen million unemployed.
Programs for Direct Relief and Job Creation
Additional New Deal programs included initiatives aimed at constructing public buildings, developing national parks, creating artworks, and stabilizing agricultural prices. The Civil Works Administration (CWA) and the Public Works Administration (PWA) were directly focused on job creation through public works projects. The Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) aimed to provide relief to farmers and regulate crop production to bolster prices. All these programs intended to restore hope and stability to the American workforce and economy.
Challenges of the New Deal
Although the New Deal facilitated job creation and infused optimism into the public psyche, inherent societal inequities remained unaddressed. The National Recovery Administration (NRA) was one such program established to protect workers by advocating for fair wages and hours, but it faced legal challenges and was ultimately declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. Despite the hurdles, the New Deal's legacy persists, with several of its initiatives continuing to impact the nation.
Learn more about New Deal here:https://brainly.com/question/36357392
#SPJ3
What is a plan of action taken by government to achieve a goal ?
Answer:
Policy
A plan of action taken by government to achieve a goal is a policy.
Explanation;
These plans or course of actions, for instance by the government, political parties, or businesses, that is intended to influence and determine decisions, actions, and other matters: For example; American foreign policy; the company's personnel policy.
Government policies; includes political activities, plans and intentions relating to a particular course, or at the assumption of legislative session.
Explanation:
Please mark brainliest and have a great day!
Why did England's citizens restore the monarchy after the rule of Oliver Cromwell?
Answer:
Oliver Cromwell took control of England's government and placed himself as Lord Protector of England after the monarchy was abolished. However, citizens were frustrated by continuing instability in England. Many citizens also disliked Cromwell's Puritan ideas. Even though Cromwell had the support of the military, his son could not gain the people's favor after Cromwell died. England restored the monarchy and offered the throne to Charles II.
Explanation:
The English citizens restored the monarchy after Oliver Cromwell's rule due to his increasing autocracy and violation of English liberties. The restoration of the monarchy with Charles II's ascension provided a sense of political stability. Additionally, Charles II's efforts strengthening England's global power and economy also contributed to the support for monarchy.
Explanation:England's citizens restored the monarchy in 1660 after the rule of Oliver Cromwell due to a number of factors. Cromwell, despite offering a seemingly better mode of governance initially, assumed broad powers and disregarded cherished English liberties under the Magna Carta, causing widespread discontent.
During Cromwell's rule, charging Charles I with treason and beheading him, the monarchy dissolved and England transformed into a republic. Cromwell headed the new English Commonwealth, marking a time known as the English interregnum or the time between kings. However, his rule became increasingly autocratic over time and many felt that their liberties were being compromised.
Moreover, when Charles II ascended the throne in 1660, there was widespread celebration among the English who recognized the value of having a king. Charles II took immediate steps to strengthen England's global power and established many overseas colonies, thus boosting England's economy. Thus, the restoration of monarchy was welcomed both for political and economic reasons.
Learn more about Restoration of English Monarchy here:https://brainly.com/question/14645384
#SPJ3
Which of the following is not a tenet of the Enlightenment?
atheism
empiricism
progressivism
rationalism
Answer:
Atheism
Explanation:
The Enlightenment, also known as the century of lights and illustration, was an intellectual and philosophical movement that dominated the world of ideas in Europe during the eighteenth century, "The Century of Philosophy."
Many people think that the thinkers of this movement were atheists, but this was rarely the case. Generally, Enlightenment had, within its thinkers, a mix of Christianity and Scientific rationalism in such a way that we have some specific movements with that sort of thinking, such as the Deist movement of the 18th century.
Final answer:
Atheism is not a tenet of the Enlightenment; rather, the period focused on reason, empiricism, progressivism, and cosmopolitanism, often using reason to understand religious concepts.
Explanation:
The Enlightenment was a period in history characterized by an emphasis on reason, empiricism, progressivism, and cosmopolitanism, among other ideas. The tenet among the options provided that is not a part of the Enlightenment is atheism. While the Enlightenment did challenge the traditional authority of the church and religious dogma, favoring scientific and empirical methods of understanding the world, it did not inherently advocate atheism. Instead, many Enlightenment thinkers sought to understand religion and the idea of God through reason and evidence rather than through blind faith or revelation.
On January 1, 1863, Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, stating that all slaves in the Confederate States that had seceded were freed. He did so without an act of Congress, maintaining that his authority as commander in chief allowed him to suspend civil law in states that were in rebellion. What is the Emancipation Proclamation an example of? (a) administrative law (b) an executive agreement (c) an executive order (d) a signing statement
Answer:
C) An executive order.
Explanation:
It is a directive issued by the President and has the force of law. The basis of this power is founded on different sources. Article Two of the United States Constitution gives the president the authority to determine how to enforce the law or manage the resources of the executive branch.
The Congress also delegates this power in the Acts of Congress, they delegate to the president some degree of discretionary power.
I hope this answer helps you.
All the following were strengths of the Union except ________.
a large population
substantial industry
an extensive railroad
the ability to fight defensively, rather than offensively
Answer:
the ability to fight defensively, rather than offensively
Explanation:
Union Army generals reexamined the offensive battle tactics developed during the Mexican-American War, with the goal of updating these tactics during the secession war. In this way, the Union had one more advantage in the conflict, since the army of the Confederates was flawed in defensive tactics. The Union Army had a greater number of soldiers, a substantial industry, an extensive railroad, and the ability to fight offensively.
What resulted from the completion of the first transcontinental railroad? Lincoln was the first president to travel across the country. The South used parts of the line to transport troops. The amount of time to travel across the country dramatically decreased. The Civil War ended sooner. Various Indian tribes sabotaged it by destroying several railroad junctions.
Answer:
The amount of time to travel across the country dramatically decreased
Explanation:
The first transcontinental railroad brought lot of benefits in the United States. The most important thing it did was that it decreased the time needed to travel from one side of the country to the other. Because the traveling became much quicker, and the two coasts were connected, it enabled the people to move across the country much more easily and quickly, which resulted in large scale migration toward the West Coast. The transportation of goods was also made much easier, quicker, and over longer distances, so the economy in multiple areas experienced rapid growth. The economic growth led to a quick modernization and development of some regions, as well as creation of numerous towns and cities.
How would you characterize Thomas Jefferson’s ideas on race and slavery?
Answer:
Thomas Jefferson's ideas on race and slavery were not totally honest. On one side he considered that “all men are created equal,” but on the other, he turned more than 600 people into slaves during his lifetime. Despite making some legislative efforts to counter slavery and oftenly lamenting its existence, he also earned money straight from the institution of slavery and, in his notes on the State of Virginia, he declared that he had a suspicion of white people being superior than black people. For Jefferson, white Americans and slaves conformed two "separate nations" unable to coexist pacifically in the same country.
Thomas Jefferson had conflicted views on race and slavery, believing in liberty yet owning slaves and considering Black people inferior. He supported gradual emancipation but feared the consequences of immediate abolition, leading to very few of his slaves being freed.
Thomas Jefferson's ideas on race and slavery were paradoxical and complex. Although he was a proponent of liberty and the principal author of the Declaration of Independence, he also enslaved over a hundred people at his Monticello plantation and believed Black people were inferior to Whites. Jefferson's writings, particularly in Notes on the State of Virginia, reveal his vision for ending slavery through gradual emancipation and his racially charged views suggesting that Black people were unfit as citizens and should be removed from the state to avoid future conflict. Despite these views, he foresaw the eventual demise of slavery and in his Draft Constitution for Virginia, he called for its end and granted specific rights for native peoples, among other progressive notions. However, Jefferson struggled with the practical implications of abolition and feared a violent racial upheaval which, coupled with his financial dependence on slavery, resulted in freeing only a handful of his slaves over his lifetime.
All the following were strengths of the Confederacy except ________.
the ability to wage a defensive war
shorter supply lines
the resources of the Upper South states
a strong navy
I'd say the first one. The ability to wage a defensive war.
All the following were strengths of the Confederacy except a strong navy. Because they have the ability to wage a defensive war, shorter supply lines, the resources of the Upper South states. The correct option is (D).
What do you mean by the Confederacy?A circumstance in which states or individuals band together for a specific goal, frequently one of politics or trade, or a group so constituted. the Confederacy, a coalition of southern states that fought in the American Civil War to secede from the Union and maintain slavery.
The military land force of the Confederate States of America was known as the Confederate States Army, often known as the Confederate Army or the Southern Army.
The principal Confederate forces, General Robert E. Lee's Army of Northern Virginia, and the Army of Tennessee's relics.
Therefore, all the following were strengths of the Confederacy except a strong navy. Because they have the ability to wage a defensive war, shorter supply lines, the resources of the Upper South states.
To know more about the Confederacy, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3806049
#SPJ2
What is the part of the US government that carries out laws ?
Answer:
Executive—Carries out laws (president, vice president, Cabinet, most federal agencies)
Explanation:
Please mark brainliest and have a great day!
In this chapter’s discussion of New York’s ratifying convention, Alexander Hamilton takes issue with Anti-Federalist delegate Melancton Smith’s assertion that (as Hamilton says) “a pure democracy, if it were practicable, would be the most perfect government.” What did Smith—and Hamilton—mean by “a pure democracy”? How does this compare to the type of democracy that represents the modern United States?
Answer:
The answer to the question is: that a "pure democracy", better known today as direct democracy, is where the people of the nation have direct control over the process of law and decision-making, without having representatives who do that for them. As such, government, and all the passing of laws, depends on the direct power of the people, and not through intermediaries.
However, the United States founding fathers, including Alexander Hamilton, did not believe that the essence and nature of the United States would justify the use of this type of democracy, so they chose instead for another form called representative democracy. These two forms clash in that in one the people have the power to enact laws, and diectly choose how, and who, rules them, while in the other, it depends on representatives that are chosen by election by the people.
Although the world today does not have many countries who use the direct democracy system, or pure democracy, there are many that use a system called semi-direct democracy. Which means, the people still have the power to establish how they will be ruled and by whom, and have the power of referedum to support, or abolish, rules passed by law-making and ruling institutions, but they still use representatives.
In the context of the New York ratifying convention, Alexander Hamilton and Melancton Smith discussed the concept of a 'pure democracy.' Hamilton disagreed with Smith's assertion that pure democracy would be the most perfect government. The modern United States represents a representative democracy, where citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf.
Explanation:In the context of the New York ratifying convention, Alexander Hamilton and Melancton Smith were discussing the concept of a 'pure democracy.' In this context, a pure democracy refers to a system of government where the majority of citizens have the power to make decisions that are binding upon the whole. Hamilton disagreed with Smith's assertion that pure democracy would be the most perfect government because he believed it could lead to instability and the violation of minority rights.
Comparing this to the type of democracy that represents the modern United States, it is important to note that the modern United States is a representative democracy. In a representative democracy, the citizens elect representatives who make decisions and pass laws on their behalf. This system is designed to protect minority rights and ensure a more stable and efficient decision-making process.
Learn more about pure democracy here:https://brainly.com/question/4061732
#SPJ12
How did the Great Compromise of 1877 influence the election?
It allowed a bilateral government agreement.
It gave new power to northern Republicans.
It encouraged southern states to support Hayes.
It gave the federal government new powers.
Answer:
It encouraged southern states to support Hayes.
Explanation:
The Compromise of 1877 resolved the disputed 1876 election between Samuel Tilden and Rutherford Hayes. In the agreement, Democrats (that were the majority in the Southern states) agreed that Hayes could become the President in exchange for the withdrawal of federal troops from the South and granted home rule in the South.
This was a major turn point in American political history, ending the Reconstruction era.
What was the primary complaint of the rebels in the Whiskey Rebellion?
the ban on alcohol
the lack of political representation for farmers
the need to fight Indians for more land
the tax on whiskey and rum
Answer:
The primary complaint of the rebels in the Whiskey Rebellion was the tax on whiskey and rum.
Explanation:
The Whiskey Rebellion was a popular uprising that began in 1791 and culminated in 1794 in Washington, DC, in the Monongahela Valley.
The rebellion began soon after the Articles of Confederation were replaced by the Constitution of 1789, which established a stronger executive power. It had its origin from the budget deficit caused by the American War of Independence, which led Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton to find new expedients: he persuaded Congress to raise taxes on spirits and alcoholic beverages such as whiskey.
The western counties of the United States then began harassing the tax collectors. The Whiskey Boys organized violent protests in Maryland, Virginia, Carolina, and Georgia. In 1794, this agitation turned into an armed revolt.
US President George Washington decreed martial law and led an army against the rebels in October 1794, that crushed the revolt. He wanted to make Pennsylvania a breeding ground for federal power, with William Rawle as Pennsylvania District Attorney for the United States.
The primary compliant of the rebels in the Whiskey Rebellion was against the federal tax on whiskey and rum. This tax was considered by the rural farmers, who were primary producers of these spirits, as unfair and burdensome.
Explanation:The primary complaint of the rebels in the Whiskey Rebellion was the tax on whiskey and rum. This uprising started in 1791 when the federal government imposed a tax on all distilled spirits, which decidedly affected the rural farmers who were the primary producers of these beverages. These farmers believed this tax was highly unfair and burdensome, sparking the rebellion which took place in the western part of Pennsylvania.
Learn more about Whiskey Rebellion here:https://brainly.com/question/478473
#SPJ3
Who were the Freemasons, and why were they significant?
Freemasons were the members of the secret fraternal order of Free and Accepted Masons that is a worldwide secret society.
Many of the founding fathers were freemasons, like George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Paul Revere, John Hancock, John Marshall. So nine of the 56 men that signed the Declaration of Independence were Masons and 13 of the 39 that signed the US Constitution were also masons.