Answer:
Collaborative learning
Explanation:
Collaborative learning is a situation in which two or more people learn or attempt to learn something together. Collaborative learning skills help people to engage productively and effectively with each other within an organization. Successful teamwork necessitates a spirit of cooperation and mutual respect.
With collaborative learning methods performance are improved.
Answer: This type of learning is called "COLLABORATIVE LEARNING"
Explanation:Collaborative learning is a type of learning where people comes together to share thoughts and work to achieve a goal. This type of learning involves people coming together to do a task like a team, and not each individual learning on its own.
Collaborative learning is a "give and take" type of learning, because you teach your group and learn from your group also. Negotiation is also met using this learning system, because you try to learn the perspective of your opposition, and teach your opposition, your own perspective
Many discussions of crime suggest that smart defendants are able to beat charges by pleading insanity, slanting their testimony at the urging of defense counsel, and exploiting legal loopholes such as the exclusionary rule. Given the profile of the typical criminal defendant, how realistic are these assumptions?
While perceptions suggest that smart defendants can easily evade charges through the insanity defense and legal strategies, these are not realistic portrayals of the average criminal defendant's situation. The insanity defense is infrequently used and seldom successful, and most defendants resort to plea bargaining due to limited resources and the potential for heavier sentences at trial.
Discussions about smart defendants beating charges often revolve around the insanity defense and perceived legal loopholes, but the reality within the criminal justice system is quite different. First, the insanity defense is narrowly defined and hard to prove, with the onus on the defendant to rebut the presumption of sanity, and it is rarely successful. In addition, the profile of a typical criminal defendant does not match the well-resourced individual capable of manipulating the system; many struggle with mental illness, adequate representation, and the financial means to mount such defenses.
Plea bargaining is a much more common occurrence in the criminal justice system due to the enormous incentives it provides for both the prosecution and the defense. Wealth plays a considerable role, where affluent defendants may have the means to afford high-powered attorneys and mount substantial defenses, potentially including the insanity defense. However, this is not the typical scenario, as the vast majority of criminal defendants do not have such resources and, instead, often rely on plea bargains to avoid harsher sentences associated with trials.
Another critical aspect is the consequences of going to trial. Defendants who exercise their right to a trial face harsher sentences compared to those who accept plea deals. Less than 3 percent of felony cases actually go to trial, which means the majority of defendants accept plea bargains, often due to coercion or the inability to mount an effective defense. This system disproportionately affects those without the means to challenge or navigate the system effectively.
According to Holmes and Rahe, who developed the Social Readjustment Rating Scale, persons who experience a number of major life changes over the course of a year are likely to have what kind of experience in the next one-two years? Select one:
a. Change of jobs more frequently than usual.
b. Have a high probability of getting a divorce.
c. Have a high probability of committing a crime.
d. Experience more health problems than usual.
Answer:
d. Experience more health problems than usual.
Explanation:
During the 1960s, psychiatrists Thomas Holmes and Richard Rahe developed the Social Readjustment Rating Scale. In their research, the author argued that people who experience a high level of stress because of a change in routine (whether positive or negative) tend to experience more health problems in the period immediately after. They also argued that, over time, life events can add up, increasing a person's risk of developing physical illnesses.
Scenario: You are a Geographic Information System (GIS) specialist who normally works at the Public Works Planning office. You are directed to report to the Incident Command Post (ICP) and have been assigned to the Planning Section Chief and will report to the Chief. You will be producing maps to display potential flooding impacts in the city and county. What NIMS Management Characteristics are you supporting
The correct answer is Chain of Command and Unity of Command ; Information and Intelligence Management
Chain of Command dives into the hierarchical structure of the organization and Unity of Commands refers to the fact that every individual has a designated supervisor that they report to. This is supported by the information given because you report to the Planning Section Chief.
On the other hand, because you are producing maps you support the Information and Intelligence Management which deals with "gathering, analyzing, assessing, sharing, and managing incident-related information and intelligence
The NIMS characteristic supported by the GIS specialist has been Chain of Command with Information and Intelligence Management.
For the analysis of the geographical situation in an area, there has been potential study for the floods and other disaster.
The geographical study has been performed and maintained in a hierarchical order, to mediate the flow of information to the supervisors and to the Planning Chief for the timely and appropriate measures.
The information has been supported with maps and analysis data that help in the intelligence management as well. The management study has been dealing with the collection of information along with assessing and analyzing for the incident management.
Thus, the NIMS characteristic supported by the Geographic Information System (GIS) specialist has been Chain of Command with Information and Intelligence Management.
For more information about GIS, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/17431971
Describe in detail the differences between the way experts and nonexperts go about solving problems. In your answer, highlight the advantages and disadvantages to being an expert in a field.
Answer:
Explanation:
To share a brief understanding of experts, who is an expert, an expert is considered, someone who has enough experience to carry put a particular task, he or she understands the possible scenarios and problems that might likely affect a system. While a non expert is someone, not that he doesn't understand the system, he might but not in details ,not enough experience unlike am expert.
So from the above analogy between experts and non experts ,it can be deduced that the method and approach to work from an expert will be more detailed because the possible scenarios of the task, he very much understands it buh a non expert, thou he might understand the task , but the approach to the system might be difference. An expert will potentially go straight to the point of the task, and even before starting the task already has a full knowledge of the problem compared to am non expert that might nor have a general knowledge of the task buh approaching the task with just confidence of previous works related to such task. I believe from the few points I have been able to point out the differences between an expert and non expert.
Being an expert in a field is a good thing in order to solve problem.
The differences between the way experts and nonexperts go about solving problems is that expert have knowledge of ways and methods solving problem while on the other hand, nonexpert have no knowledge about solving problem.
Advantages of being an expert in a field is that expert know how to use different tools and methods for solving problem while on the other hand, disadvantages of being an expert in a field is that expert is not able to learn or accept new problems or situations so we can conclude that being an expert in a field is a good thing in order to solve problem.
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/15016613
While it offers compelling explanations for language development, the most significant shortcoming of the nativist account is
a. many of its claims are difficult to falsify.
b. its emphasis on extralinguistic information.
c. the emphasis on neurophysiology.
d. it does not address generatively.
Answer: The answer is A). Many of its claims are difficult to falsify
Explanation: The nativist theory is a biologically based theory, which argues that humans are pre-programmed with the innate ability to develop language. Noam Chomsky is a strong advocate for the nativist theory of language development.
Chomsky was known for his radical ideas about children being born with innate or "built-in" language devices. These claims are hard to falsify because there is no way to actually verify if at all human has an innate faculty for language.
Compare and contrast communism and fascism. Select one example for each to examine the origins of the governments, their accomplishments, and their failures. What accounts for the fact that the masses mobilized to support these movements? Elaborate.
Answer:
communism is a system based around a theory of economic equality and advocates for a classless society, WHILE, fascism is a nationalistic, top-down system with rigid class roles that is ruled by an all-powerful dictator. Both communism and fascism originated in Europe and gained popularity in the early to mid 20th century.
Fascist governments are different from communist ones in that fascists, in theory, support the right of labor representatives and corporate representatives (CEOs, company presidents, etc.) to negotiate - through a system called corporatism.
Explanation: The most disturbing development of the interwar era was the emergence of totalitarian communist and fascist governments.1 Italian dictator Benito Mussolini coined the word “totalitarian” to express the state’s role of personifying the “immanent spirit of the nation,” but the word has come to mean the state’s total control of politics, economics, and society. In this sense, totalitarianism has been more nearly a “communist” than a “fascist” phenomenon.
Using the dropdown menus, select the blank lines, and choose the answers that best complete the sentence.For Graded at Due Date questions, you can see answers and explanations only after the deadline passes,and you will not be able to try a question again after it is graded.What does it mean for a question to be randomized?
Some students won’t be allowed to answer questions.
Only one variation of a question is seen by all students.
Every student in the class will see a different variation of the other
Answer: Every student in the class will see a different variation of the other
Explanation: When questions are randomized, it means that questions are arranged in a different order for every student. For example, the first question for Student A might be the tenth question for Student B and so on. All the students will get the same questions but they will be different variations.
This method of questionnaire formatting has different purposes. It can prevent students from copying each other during tests and is especially useful in surveys to reduce the question order bias. The question order bias occurs when respondents to a survey answer differently due to the order of the question.
Randomized questions in assessments mean every student gets a different variation of a question, ensuring test integrity and fairness. This is a common practice in online education, especially in Computers and Technology courses.
Explanation:When a question is described as being randomized, it fundamentally means that every student in the class will see a different variation of the question. This approach is often utilized in online assessments to ensure academic integrity, making it harder for students to share answers. Each variation maintains the same underlying concepts and difficulty level, but the specifics (such as figures, names, or scenarios) differ. This method does not mean that some students won’t be allowed to answer questions or that only one variation is seen by all students. Instead, it ensures a fair and equitable testing environment by providing each student with a unique set of questions to answer.
The importance of randomized questions cannot be overstated in educational settings, especially in subjects like Computers and Technology where assessments can often be taken remotely. This strategy helps instructors maintain the integrity of their assessments and ensures that grades reflect students’ individual knowledge and understanding.
McGaa identifies four ethical commandments within Native American moral thinking that are summarized in the concept of ____________, which implies that all living things are interrelated in an extended family. The four commandments are respect for the earth, respect for the Great Spirit, respect for fellow humans, and respect for individual freedom.
McGaa identifies four ethical commandments within Native American moral thinking that are summarized in the concept of coexistence.
Explanation:
The societies of the native Americans were increasingly naturalistic and wee about living in harmony with and respect the elements of the nature around them.
This was surmised in their core four values which are respect for the Great Spirit, respect for fellow humans, and respect for individual freedom.
These values are at large the symbol of coexistence among the people who believe they must live in harmony with their surroundings and fellow human.
You have learned that earnings functions are one of the most investigated relationships in economics. These typically relate the logarithm of earnings to a series of explanatory variables such as education, work experience, gender, race, etc. Why do you think that researchers have preferred a log-linear specification over a linear specification?
Researchers prefer the log-linear specification because economic gains are not naturally distributed.
We can arrive at this answer because:
Within the economy, earnings are a dependent variable in relation to factors such as education, professional experiences, race, and other elements that can be considered independent variables.The distribution of earnings within an economic system is not done naturally.This promotes an increase in the error variation, which can harm an analysis with a linear method.In this case, the use of log-linear specification can cause a more stabilized distribution that is closer to reality, promoting more precise and correct results.
More information:
https://brainly.com/question/967776?referrer=searchResults
Working with people from other cultures will require tolerance. One of the best ways to become more tolerant is by Group of answer choices practicing empathy. increasing your individualism. encouraging ethnocentrism. knowing your communication style.
Answer: Practice of empathy
Explanation:
Empathy is ability due to which a person tends to share their ideas and thought with other people so that they can understand it.It helps people to understand about others emotion, mind state ,issues, etc.
According to the question, practicing empathy will make a person more tolerant between working with other culture people as they will tend to understand others feeling and views more.Thus, the person can control himself/herself by perceiving emotions of others.
Other options are incorrect because individualism increment, acknowledging own communication pattern and increasing ethnocentrism are not the impact that makes a person tolerant while working with other different cultured people.Thus, the correct option is empathy practice.
Google is a great tool, but it is necessary to be skeptical and evaluate the provided results. For example, upon searching "standard error of the difference between two means" the first hit is a link to a web page from Keane University where the equation for the standard error of the difference between two means is given as:
Question:
The question is incomplete. It can be found in search engines. However, kindly find the complete question in the attachment below.
Answer / Explanation:
It should be noted that what is being displayed by google is :
Standers Error of Population Means (SEμ₁ - μ₂) = √σ₁² / η₁ + σ₂² / η₂
The equation above gives the standard error for population mean. However, it does not give the standard population error for two sample mean so therefore, we can comfortably say that the equation
(SEμ₁ - μ₂) = √σ₁² / η₁ + σ₂² / η₂ is not wrong.
However, moving forward,
the correct equation for standard error for two sample mean is:
(SEε₁ - ε₂) = √ Sp² ( 1 / η₁ + 1 / η₂ )
On stating the above equation, It should be understood that the equation above has given the standard error for two sample mean when the population variance are assumed to be equal thus the standard deviations of the two population are assumed to be equal.
So in conclusion, we can say that the correct statement is that Greek letters are usually used in the equations for population parameters whereas Latin letters are usually used in the equation for sample statistics.
Thus, we can say that Latin letters are usually used in the equations for population parameters,
while Greek letters are usually used in the equation for sample statistics is incorrect.
The standard error of the mean measures sample mean variations from the population mean and provides insights into correlation strength. Caution is advised when interpreting significant differences using the student's t-test. Researchers estimate the standard error of the difference in sample means for hypothesis testing using two sample standard deviations.
Standard error of the mean is a measure of how sample means vary from the population mean and is calculated to estimate this difference. It helps researchers understand the uncertainty in their model and the strength of the variables' correlation.
When comparing two means using the student's t-test, caution is needed as high standard deviations can falsely indicate a significant difference when in reality there may not be one.
To calculate the standard error of the difference in sample means (X₁ - X₂) for hypothesis testing, researchers estimate it using the two sample standard deviations from independent samples.
Historian Stephanie Coontz points out that by 1978, __________ percent of the population thought that it was morally okay to be single and have children.
Answer:
75
Explanation:
Stephanie Coontz a professor of history at The Evergreen State College in Olympia, Washington and the chief of Public Education and Research at the Council on Contemporary Families. She is generally a recognized figure and one of the leading personalities on the history of the American family.
According to her book titled "Marriage, A History," she revealed that by 1978 75% of the population will believe that it was morally fine to be single and have children.
Charice's boyfriend is late for their date. She believes this is because he is thoughtless and self-centered. Cherokee has made a(n) _______ attribution.
Answer:
personal/internal attribution
Explanation:
"Attribution" refers to the process in which a person tries to explain what led to the events or behaviors that occur. There are mainly two types of attributions: internal attribution and external attribution.
Internal Attribution - is also known as "Personal Attribution." This refers to explaining a person's behavior according to his personal characteristics.
External Attribution - is also known as "Situational Attribution." This refers to explaining a person's behavior according to external factors like stress, abuse and the like.
The situation above is an example of "personal attribution." Charice thinks that her boyfriend is late because he is thoughtless and self-centered. She is finding a reason for his being late by looking at him internally.
So, this explains the answer.
Follows the pleasure principle Tries to satisfy urges while acknowledging the constraints of the real world Emerges during the resolution of the Oedipal/Electra complexes Acts like your conscience by avoiding bad behavior and striving for morally correct behavior
Answer:
This question is Incomplete, here is the complete question:
36. According to Freud, the ego ________.
a. follows the pleasure principle
b. tries to satisfy urges while acknowledging the constraints of the real world
c. emerges during the resolution of the Oedipal/Electra complexes
d. acts like your conscience by avoiding bad behavior and striving for morally correct behavior.
Answer:
b. tries to satisfy urges while acknowledging the constraints of the real world
Explanation:
Sigmund Freud, a neurologist who was born in Austria, he was the founder of psychoanalysis, a clinical technique for diagnosing psychopathology through the use of dialogue among a patient and a psychoanalyst.
According to Freud's theory of the psyche, the id stands as the primitive and instinctual element of the mind and it contains sexual and aggressive drives coupled with secreted memories, the super-ego functions as a moral conscience, and it is the pragmatic element that mediates among the desires of the id and that of the super-ego.
Aftican kingdoms were part of the atlantic slave trade, trading africans from other kingdoms who they had jailed or were holding as prisoners of war for weapons and other manufactured goods.
A: true
B: false
African kingdoms were part of the Atlantic slave trade, trading Africans from other kingdoms who they had jailed or were holding as prisoners of war for weapons and other manufactured goods.
A: true
Explanation:
A large number of the slaves that came from Africa were sold by the Africans themselves. There was a tradition of holding slaves, albeit not as strict in Africa.
So, many African kingdoms were part of the Atlantic slave trade, and they were trading Africans from other kingdoms who they had jailed or were holding as prisoners of war for weapons and other manufactured goods.
They would also eventually sell their own people for profit to the Traders as they made their economy rely on this trade.
You may think that it is colder if you see several low electronic thermometer readings on your way to work than if you took a different route that did not provide this information and you had to make your judgment based on how cold it felt to you. Your judgment is affected by the visual feedback you are receiving from the thermometers according to the_______
Answer: Availability heuristic
Explanation: Availability heuristic is a mental approach which relies on instant case that come to a given person's mind when assessing a specific topic, ideas, technique or conclusion.
22. Two closed, pyramid-shaped beakers containing clearly identical amounts of a liquid are judged by a child to hold different amounts after one of the beakers is inverted. The child apparently lacks a sense of what child development milestone?
Answer:
b. Concept of conservation
Explanation:
The concept of conservation is related to logical ability. This is the ability to understand the logical thinking that a certain quantity is the same despite the size has been changed. It helps a person to understand the shape and size, and apparent size.
The concept of conservation was given by Jean Piaget. The conservation is not found in the pre-operational stage of development in children. Conservation is a property of children in which children developed logical thinking about the invariant size, shape of an object despite it is not resent in front of a child.
Thus in the above statement, the child lacks the sense of what child development milestone.
Four-year-old Hedley is unhappy that he was only given one cookie. "Not enough!" he says. His father takes the cookie and breaks it into three pieces, which he lines up side by side. "That's better," says Hedley. This example shows that Hedley is paying attention to states rather than _____________.
Answer: Transformations
Explanation:
Hedley is still within the early childhood and is still undergoing physical and cognitive development that is why he finds it difficult to accept the cookie as one but he was satisfied and happy when he finds out that it is now in three pieces.
TO HEDLEY, THE COOKIE BEING BROKEN INTO MORE THAN ONE SAMPLE IS BETTER AND BIGGER IN SIZE THAN THE COOKIE WHEN TRANSFORMED INTO A SINGLE PIECE OF COOKIE.
The ethical framework that assumes that people are deeply connected to one another in webs of relationships, and that ethical decisions cannot be made outside the context of those relationships is known as: A. Free Market Ethics B. Ethic of Care C. Deontology D. Virtue Ethics
Answer:
B. Ethic of Care
Explanation:
The Ethics of Care is based on moral feelings and the human ability to care for other people. According to this idea, social relations and the morals related to them are based on day by day behaviors, and cannot be understood without the social context which it's inserted. In other words, the Ethics of Care attempts to create a society based on the otherness, where each individual should look at the other as important. Most important is that, according to this theory, all the consequences of moral conduct would affect everyone.
As part of a plan to emphasize a dynamic corporate culture at the Gagnier and Morris advertising company, Yvette has done away with traditional cubicles and replaced them with open-area, nonterritorial workspaces, or "hot desks." Nonterritorial offices Heightened global competition Emphasis on Ethics
Answer:
Nonterritorial offices
Explanation:
Nonterritorial offices are the system of offices in which all employees can sit wherever they want, allowing them to chose their space according to their current needs and the day's task.
They can find a more quiet place if the work demands it or can choose the place with more people on the "hot desk" or open area, in case they want to communicate, share ideas and cooperate on some work. This is fitting for an advertising company where this kind of communication and cooperation is encouraged.
Answer: Non Territorial offices
Explanation: your welcome, please mark me brainliest
1. ""Often he reached out for the best without knowing why he wanted it – and sometimes he ran up against the mysterious denials and prohibitions in which life indulges."" Why is this line significant? Is this about denial as the narrator suggests? What is denied?
Answer: He wants to have his children to have more money and be even more comfortable.
The denial is in his own mind and he feels like he was not given something he should have been.
Final answer:
The line emphasizes the human experience of striving for desires and facing inexplicable obstacles, which is a universal aspect of life. It signifies both the inner confusion about one's ambitions and the external denials faced due to societal structures or fate.
Explanation:
The line "Often he reached out for the best without knowing why he wanted it – and sometimes he ran up against the mysterious denials and prohibitions in which life indulges" is significant as it captures the essence of the human condition with respect to ambition and the impediments faced in the pursuit of dreams. The character's striving for 'the best' represents a universal human desire to attain greatness or fulfillment, but encountering 'mysterious denials and prohibitions' suggests the inexplicable barriers and setbacks one faces in life. These setbacks might not always be logical or just, but they are a part of the human experience, often leaving us with questions about our desires and the obstacles that prevent us from achieving them. The denial here is twofold: the denial of achieving one's desires without a clear rationale and the denial from societal structures or the 'mysterious' workings of fate that prevent him from attaining his goals.
Bob took the painting back to Jane and asked for a refund. Jane refused on the basis that she never gave refunds and that Bob took the risk that the painting was not done by Bill. Should Bob sue in small claims court, who will likely win and why?
Full Question:
Jane operates a home decorations shop selling slightly used goods. She bought a painting from Sally for the shop. Bob came into the shop and asked if the painting was by Bill, a local artist of some repute. Jane, without checking with Sally, says, "I'm sure it is" because she really did think it looked like one of Bill's paintings. Bob bought the painting. A week or so later, he took the painting by Bill's studio. Bill just laughed and said that he never painted anything that horrible. Bob took the painting back to Jane and asked for a refund. Jane refused on the basis that she never gave refunds and that Bob took the risk that the painting was not done by Bill. Should Bob sue in small claims court, who will likely win and why?
a. Bob, on the basis of negligent misrepresentation
b. Bob, on the basis of innocent misrepresentation.
c. Bob, on the basis of a unilateral mistake.
d. Jane, on the basis that Bob accepted the risk of loss.
e. Jane, both on the basis that Bob accepted the risk of loss and that he agreed by an oral contract to purchase the painting.
Answer:
a. Bob, on the basis of negligent misrepresentation
Explanation:
Negligent misrepresentation
occurs when someone makes a statement without making sure this statement is based on true facts. Negligent misrepresentation happens when a person may not lie directly (saying something knowing it to be untrue), but makes a statement about something with no factual backing. Bob will likely win here because Jane "assumed" the painting was from Bill without confirming it was.
Suppose that you are in the top floor of a library, and you suddenly think about some information you need on the main floor. You return to the main floor and find that you can't recall what you needed. After returning to the top floor, you recall instantly.
Answer: you forget what you had in your mind
Explanation:
you cant remember what you were thinking.
Answer: This is an example of The encoding specificity principle.
Explanation: This principle was introduced by Thompson and Tulving who suggested that contextual information is encoded with memories which effects the retrieval of said memories. This principles illustrates that matching the encoding contexts of information at recall assists in the retrieval of episodic memories.
The CASEL Model Site evaluation of SEL programs examined their level of quality over five years. Programs that did continue to provide high-quality services had three characteristics. Which characteristic below is one of those three?
a. training and skill development among teachers
b. support from school administration and parents
c. extensive funding for the program
d. both ‘a’ and ‘b’
The correct answer is letter A
Explanation: CASEL programs examined high-quality, school-based prevention programs that sustain the level of quality for five years now.
CASEL model is a type of educational model, where teachers are trained so that they are very competent in what they do and thus become good teachers with a preparation focused on a phenomenal type of education.
"A medical technician feels undervalued and wants more responsiblity and money. Management wants to cut postoperative infection rates by 50 percent. Which of the following statements would fall under Desired Results in a Win-Win Agreement? "
New Title, promotion, and 10 percent pay increase for technician. Infection rates drop by 50 percent in postoperative wards.
align conflicting priorities
Answer:align conflicting priorities
Explanation:Aligning conflicting priorities means you make some compromise to meet each other halfway such that everyone or both parties walk away happy . Management will have to make some compromise and the technician as well and then they both have to establish something that will align with both their needs.
Align conflicting priorities: when conflicting priorities are aligned and revisited it will yield a win-win result..
Mischa has just met a man she finds attractive at a party. She would really like for him to feel as attracted to her as she feels to him. Based on research on embodied cognition, what should Mischa do to promote his attraction to her?
The correct answer is Try to hand him a large object that will make his arms open towards her in the same motion as a bear hug
From the place of the cognitive perspective, the understanding of mathematical ideas is not apprehended only through the concepts of pure mathematics, it would be easier to look in the precursor authors for what motivated them to think and develop their theories, what they should have in mind, when they discovered / created their theories / mathematical bases and, how they understood that mathematical knowledge for them. It is important to note that such aspects are never taken into account when teaching / learning some mathematical theory.
The full participant may be a genuine participant in what he or she is studying or at least pretend to be a genuine participant. In any event, if a researcher is acting as a full participant, he/she lets people see him/her only as a___________________________, not as a researcher.
Answer: Participant
Explanation:
Full participant or complete participant is the person who is completely attached researcher of the experiment or study.This researcher is immersed in experiment completely such that participants aren't aware that research is being conducted on them while interacting and observing with researcher .
According to the question,if any researcher is acting as complete participants then other participants involved in the study do not have hint about researcher. They don't behave as researcher during study with participants and thus, others see researcher as participant.
The correct answer is participant
Explanation: In this case the full participant cannot let people discover that it is the full participant and this makes them act as if they were a normal research participant, which is a difficult job because you must be very careful so that the other participants do not realize that one who looks like a normal participant is actually not.
Injecting a person with an excitatory chemical that activates the sympathetic nervous system is likely to increase his or her subjective experience of intense fear and anxiety. Use one of the major theories of emotion to account for the effects of this chemical on a person's emotional state.
Which theory of emotion would have the greatest difficulty explaining these effects?
a. James-Lange theory
b. Cannon-Bard theory
c. Two-Factor theory
Answer: Research students should note that the Cannon-Bard theory would have the most difficult time explaining the increase in fear produced by the chemical.
Explanation: Research students can use any of the theories of emotion to discuss the possible effect of this chemical:-
James-Lange theory:- the chemical would intensify his or her physiological response, which in turn would intensify the experienced emotion.
Cannon-Bard theory:- the physiological change might be increased by the chemical but that would not affect the experienced emotion.
Two-factor theory :- the chemical would intensify the physiological response, which would change the cognitive label applied.
Final answer:
The James-Lange theory posits that physiological changes lead to emotion, making it compatible with the scenario of chemical-induced sympathetic activation. The b. Cannon-Bard theory claims emotion and physiological response occur simultaneously and independently, making it less able to account for the effects of the chemical. The Two-Factor theory emphasizes cognitive labeling of arousal to create emotion, offering another plausible explanation.
Explanation:
The James-Lange theory of emotion suggests that injecting a person with an excitatory chemical that activates the sympathetic nervous system would lead to an increase in symptoms such as a racing heart and quickened breath, which would then be interpreted as fear and anxiety. Based on this theory, physiological changes precede and give rise to the emotional experience. In contrast, the Cannon-Bard theory posits that the emotional experience would occur simultaneously with the physiological changes, but independently. The Two-Factor theory, or Schachter-Singer theory, could also account for these effects through its emphasis on the cognitive labeling of physiological arousal within a context to create an emotional experience. Therefore, a theory that would have the greatest difficulty explaining these effects is the Cannon-Bard theory, because it proposes that emotions and physiological responses occur simultaneously, rather than one causing the other.
If a person took a drug that prevented sympathetic nervous system activation while finding a venomous snake crawling up their leg, the James-Lange theory would predict that the individual would not experience fear due to the absence of physiological arousal which they believe is necessary for the emotional response.
how is a civic virtue different from other kinds of virtue?
A. the behavior is different
B. people with civic virtue are morally superior
C. the goal is to promote democracy
D. the aim is to promote moral goodness
Answer:
C. the goal is to promote democracy
Explanation:
Civic virtue is different from other kinds of virtue because the goal is to promote democracy, it has to do with the willingness to do ones part in supporting the effort of the government and public good and it is important for the success/effective functioning of a government and society.
Christen who just turned eighteen is out with several friends. They decide to see a movie, but it is sold out. Christen hid in the back of the theatre and yelled "Fire" as loudly as she could. Everyone ran out of the theatre, and a number got in their vehicles and left. Christen and her friends thought that seeing the movie was now possible. Unfortunately, a theatre employee saw Christen yelling, called the police, and she was arrested. Christen told the police officers that she was only exercising her free speech rights. She also told the police that the theatre employee lied and that she personally saw him stealing popcorn. The theatre employee told Christen that he was going to sue for defamation, and she told him that she would win based on her right to free speech. Discuss whether Christen is right on one or both counts and why.
Answer:
Christen is wrong in both counts.
Explanation:
Freedom of speech or freedom of expression is the individual or collective right to enunciate, utter and develop individual or community ideas, opinions and arguments. It is expected that anyone can express their ideas free from retaliation, censorship, or legal action. It is recognised as a Universal Human Right, and most countries in the world include it as part of its constitution.
However, freedom of speech has some limitations, which are imposed aiming to restrain people to harm other individuals or communities. For instance, when someone intentionally lies to commit fraud. These limitations vary from country to country, for instance, Germany forbids speech that denies the Holocaust, but Spain does not. Yet, there are some common limitations to free speech across most UN Member States. These are related to incitement to terrorism or riot, fraud, unauthorised usage of copyrighted material, invitation or incitation to commit a crime, defamation and in many cases obscenity.
Christen yelled "Fire" in an attempt to prompt the theatre audience to vacate. This was a lie, since there was not a fire in the facilities. This can be taken as a fraud, since she tricked the patrons to abandon the premises.
When she was caught, she intended to defame the theatre employee.
In both occasions, she was not protected by freedom of speech principle.
Final answer:
Christen's claim of exercising her free speech rights is incorrect because falsely shouting 'Fire' in a crowded space is not protected under the First Amendment due to the clear and present danger it poses.
Explanation:
Christen is not correct in asserting that her actions are protected under free speech rights for two reasons.
First, the act of falsely yelling "Fire" in a crowded theatre does not constitute protected speech because it presents a clear and present danger to public order, potentially leading to panic and harm, as established by the Supreme Court's longstanding precedent.
Secondly, Christen's accusation against the theatre employee could constitute defamation if it is proven to be false and made with malice.
According to legal precedents, such as Schenck v. United States (1919), shouting that there is a fire when there is none is a classic example where free speech is limited due to the potential immediate threat to safety.
As for defamation, Christen's false accusation about the employee stealing popcorn, if proven untrue and damaging to the employee's reputation, could lead to a successful defamation suit, as indicated by the legal standards for libel and slander.