Read the speech and answer the question.

Voluntourism: An Opportunity Too Good to be True

A Speech to the Student Body of Evergreen High

[1] Picture this: It's Spring Break, and you fly off to some country where there's lush rainforests and beautiful, blue coastlines to explore. There's also people in need, so you decide to blend your vacation with volunteering. Volunteering as a tourist, or voluntourism, seems like a great way to explore new regions and help people at the same time. However, this "volunteer plus travel" experience can actually harm local communities. While many teens might view traveling and volunteering abroad as a worthwhile adventure, there are more genuine and effective ways to make a difference.

[2] Most would agree that volunteering in general is a worthy use of time. However, what if you found out the children you are "helping" are actually being kept in poor conditions so voluntourists will spend money to come to the local area? Dale Rolfe, a supporter of ethical voluntourism, explains the shocking reality that "Animal sanctuaries and orphanages are often manufactured for the voluntourist...encouraging a cycle of exploiting the very animals and children the volunteers are trying to help."

[3] Proponents of the "volunteer plus travel" experience also argue that traveling to new places builds character and is a valuable way to learn about different cultures. With voluntourism, however, participants often pursue experiences that are all about them. For example, they sign up to build a school for a gold star on their resume, but they have no real building skills and take jobs away from local construction workers (Schulten). Or, they arrive to teach English but instead take selfies with the locals. One world traveler and ethical voluntourist believes voluntourism "can perpetuate small minded views of the world by taking insulated, fake, and structured experiences and selling them as unabridged and eye opening" (Carlos). The voluntour experience is a mirage. The voluntourist's eyes are not opened to real life at the destination, and lasting change is not achieved.

[4] If you want a genuine experience where you can see a lasting impact, there are better options than voluntourism. You can volunteer in your local community. Give an hour every week to your town's animal rescue. Serve monthly dinners to the homeless. Be a reliable, positive influence on a child who needs a mentor. Studies show that volunteering and forming lasting relationships with those you help has a positive impact on your physical and emotional health. In fact, blood pressure is reduced, memory is improved, and rates of depression are reduced (Michaels).

[5] There is another reason to look into alternatives to voluntourism. Did you know the average "voluntour" travel package costs $3,400 (Rolfe)? Could that travel money be better spent? If the world's citizens are your passion, it could go to an international organization. If you care about education, your funds can be used to buy books for students in faraway lands. If you want villagers to have clean water, contribute funds to local efforts to dig wells. If you want to experience a different culture, travel to the country as a guest, and learn from the locals how you can best help them after you've returned home. But do not voluntour.

[6] In reality, there are better ways to make a difference. Voluntourism might appear to be an adventure that blends travel and helping others, but it does little except provide a costly, superficial experience that might actually do more harm than good. So, volunteer where you are most needed-at home, where you can stay to see the job through and form genuine, lasting relationships. Choose a beautiful coastline closer to home and send the travel money you saved to an international organization that will put it to good use. Whatever you do, don't turn someone else's hardship into your vacation.

How does the speaker's metaphor of a gold star in paragraph 3 support the purpose of the speech?

A) It challenges the audience to view voluntourism opportunities in a positive light.
B) It confirms the idea that voluntourism experiences look good on a college or career resume.
C) It emphasizes the selfish and superficial motivation behind voluntour opportunities.
D) It highlights the generous contribution that voluntours make to the areas they visit.

The likely impact of the simile on English readers is that "Smiths comparison of Virginia to the English coast would help readers visualize the new world more easily".

In conclusion, the correct option is C.

Read related link on:

https://brainly.com/question/12416667

Answer:

The correct answer is A. Hope this helps

Explanation:

Answer:

1st one

Explanation:

Took test :)

Answer:

Answer:

The author's reason for writing

Explanation:

purpose: the reason for which something is done or created or for which something exists.

So an authors purpose is his or her reason for writing.

Answer:

oxymoron

-----------

The literary device in the sentence is an oxymoron, as it pairs contradictory terms "awfully" and "good." Oxymorons are used to create an effective description by combining opposites.

An oxymoron is used as a literary device in the statement "The dish tasted awfully good." A figure of speech that mixes terms that are contradictory is called an oxymoron. Because "good" has a positive connotation and "awfully" usually has a negative one, the phrase "awfully good" is paradoxical in this instance.

Another example of an oxymoron from the provided references involves phrases like "full stomachs pushed against their jeans," where the physical discomfort of being full contrasts with the pleasure of eating delicious food.

Answer:

Answer is Option B: Children are separated from parental figures, and sibling relationships are not encouraged.

Explanation:

In "Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass", Frederick Douglass wrote this to "prove" his identity, and to let a greater number of people know about his powerful criticism of slavery.  

The narrator was a slave and he explains to the people how slaves were treated. Life under Colonel Lloyd was brutal where family relations were not given any importance. They were separated from their parents and were not allowed to interact with anyone. They did like this so that slaves are not distracted by anyone. It would cause hindrance to their work. They made sure that siblings were not kept together.

Answer:

B

Explanation:

PLZZZZZZZ MARK ME :)

Answer:

That she hath engrossed us is true, and defended the continent at our expense as well as her own is admitted, and she would have defended Turkey from the same motive, viz., the sake of trade and dominion.

We have boasted the protection of Great Britain, without considering, that her motive was interest not attachment

Explanation:

They are the only sentence mentioning Great Britain's interests.

That she hath engrossed us is true, and defended the continent at our expense as well as her own is admitted, and she would have defended Turkey from the same motive, viz., the sake of trade and dominion  and  We have boasted the protection of Great Britain, without considering, that her motive was interest not attachment

This is the answer for Plato. I just did this test

Answer:

a

Explanation:

...

Answer:

The theme which is portrayed in this excerpt from Leo Tolstoy’s The Death of Ivan Ilyich is, the theme of materialism and leading a shallow life.

Explanation:

The main theme of the novel ‘The Death of Ivan Ilyich’ East most certainly death. The story revolves around the character Ivan llyich who confronts with his own death and how that changes everything. However, apart from the central theme of the death, the passage provided depicts the theme of shallow life and materialism.

From the excerpt we can see that how people are living their life, all they want is just to look rich and to impress people with their materialistic things. The excerpt depicts the things that are found in the house of a person who is wealthy.

Answer:

It turns out that Eckels accidentally stepped on and killed a butterfly.

Explanation:

Answer:

D,A,B,D

Explanation:

it's in the passage

The conflict in Okonkwo's life is primarily internal, or man versus self. Okonkwo's major motivation is a desire not to resemble his father in any way. His violent nature is indirectly described by his heavy-handed rule over his household, and his violence is a key trait revealed early in the passage.

1) The type of conflict shown by Okonkwo's fear in this passage from Things Fall Apart is D) Man vs. Self. This is evident from Okonkwo's internal struggle with his fear of failure, weakness, and becoming like his father.

2) The major motivation of Okonkwo revealed in this passage is A) He does not want to be anything like his father. This is made clear by Okonkwo's resentment toward his father and his passion to hate everything his father loved.

3) The statement that provides an example of indirect characterization of Okonkwo's violent nature is B) "Okonkwo ruled his household with a heavy hand." This phrase suggests Okonkwo's domineering and violent tendencies.

4) The character trait of Okonkwo revealed at the beginning of this passage is D) He is very violent, as is clear from the mention of his wives and children living in constant fear of his temper.

https://brainly.com/question/32442744

#SPJ2

Answer:

B. What is reasonable

Explanation:

If it is based on opinion or what you expect then it would be subjective and not true evidence

Answer:

It's A. expert opinion

Explanation:

Just got it right!!!!!!

Kennedy's generation, especially the changing atmosphere of the 1960s, influenced his vision for a diversified democracy and a society based on fairness. He appealed to the young generation to push for these changes, and also focused on foreign policy, including the space race. However, his assassination indicated that his vision was not universally accepted.

Kennedy's vision for the future was heavily influenced by his generation, particularly the atmosphere of the 1960s which was a period of great change. In Kennedy's New Frontier speech, he emphasized the country's aspirations and challenges, calling for a more inclusive democracy and an era of hope and change. He especially appealed to the younger generation, including students and activists, to push for a society that was more equitable, pushing for social and economic freedoms. Kennedy also centered his efforts on foreign policy, such as aiming to outdo the Soviets in the space race, which represented his commitment to protecting the interests of the free world and advancing American technological superiority. However, his assassination, along with the assassinations of Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert F. Kennedy, signaled a stark reminder that not all Americans shared this vision.

https://brainly.com/question/498029

#SPJ11

Answer:

The best answers are:

* Aeneas

* The battle of Troy.

* It shows he is weak.

Explanation:

* Aeneas is the son of a Greek god in this allusion

* The mythic event refered to by the text is the battle of Troy

* The allusion describes his character as being weak.

A figurative speech that refers the objects or circumstances to the unrelated contexts by indirect and covert references is called allusion.

Thus, this depicts the text from The battle of Troy

Learn more about The Battle of Troy here:

https://brainly.com/question/25996561

Answer:

By describing actions such as "seemed to look each of us in the eye"

Explanation:

~AJTHESHOOTER...

Answer: B

Explanation:

Answer:

d

Explanation:

Answer:c

Explanation:

The statement about George that is best supported by the latter parts of the excerpt is that he wants Lennie to calm down and go to bed. Thus, the correct option for this question is C.

In literature, an excerpt may be defined as a type of short part taken from a speech, book, movie, etc. An excerpt from her new thriller will appear in this weekend's magazine. It is basically a part of any passage that significantly represents information.

The latter part of the excerpt reveals that he wants Lennie to calm down and go to bed. They have probably been co-workers before. However, at the end of the novella, George is forced to kill Lennie after Lennie kills Curley's wife.

This is because of these events, George will not follow their dream of living off the land despite the fact that the dream was achievable when Lennie was alive.

Therefore, the statement about George that is best supported by the latter parts of the excerpt is that he wants Lennie to calm down and go to bed. Thus, the correct option for this question is C.

To learn more about George and Lennie, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/19164862

#SPJ2

The phrase 'I put my bashfulness in my pocket' suggests overcoming shyness to engage in conversation, aligned with the option of choosing to talk to a fellow traveler.

When Alcott says she "put my bashfulness in my pocket", it can be interpreted that she decided to overcome her shyness and engage in an action that required her to be more outgoing or assertive than usual. This phrase suggests the act of temporarily setting aside one's shy nature to face a situation with more confidence. Option A, 'She decided to talk to a fellow traveler', would align with this understanding because it implies a decision to engage in conversation despite feelings of shyness or hesitation. Thus, talking to a fellow traveler would demonstrate putting one's bashfulness away like an object that can be stored and retrieved later.

Bigger daydreams that he is going to work for the Dalton who was a millionaire.

Explanation:

In the second movie, Bigger day dreams about something. The day dram that he had in the second movie was that he was going to start working for Dalton. This was going to be something big for him.

The reason he liked this was that Dalton was a millionaire. Moreover Dalton had a daughter who was a hot kind of a girl. She spends a lot of money and Bigger had a dream that he was going to drive her around. According to the dream, the girl had a secret which she would tell to Bigger and give her money to not to tell it to anyone.

Answer:

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, being the African American leader advocating civil rights.

Explanation:

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was born in 1929 in Atlanta, thence, studied Theology doctorate by 1955. After to which, organized his first protest, being influenced by M. K. Gandhi, as Montgomery Bus Boycott.

Racial segregation was highly advocated against by him in his protest as civil disobedience with non violence. Later, his orator ship gained him the support.

March towards Washington was his next move, in 1963, and a year later, 24th amendment was ratified and Civil Rights Act was codified and enacted.

in the same year of 1964, he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in the month of October.

This article describes a sequence of events before king was awarded the Nobel peace prize is :

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for being the African American leader advocating civil rights.

Learn more :

https://brainly.com/question/26275458?referrer=searchResults

Benefits of a School Dress Code:

1) A dress code promotes a more serious school atmosphere which emphasizes academics and promotes good behavior.

2) Dress codes have proven to increase student achievement by encouraging students to concentrate more on their studies and less on their wardrobe. A de-emphasis on clothing can also save money, as there will be less pressure to keep up with expensive trends and fashions.

3) Dress codes in school settings reduce social conflict and peer pressure that may be associated with appearance.

4) Studies indicate that a school dress code can reduces the prevalence of certain behaviors which are often expressed through wardrobe such as violence or promiscuity.

5) As opposed to uniforms, dress codes still allow students to wear what they want which leaves students with a sense of choice and expression.

Hope this helps! ;)

Final answer:

Dress codes in schools can encourage professionalism, ensure equality by minimizing socioeconomic differences, and enhance safety by restricting inappropriate symbols. However, they may also restrict personal expression and reflect shifting cultural norms. The appropriateness of dress codes often depends on the specific cultural and institutional context.

Explanation:

The question of whether there should be a dress code at school is a complex one. Here are three reasons in support of a dress code:

Professionalism: Dress codes can instill a sense of professionalism and prepare students for workplace expectations. This mirrors the practice of dressing formally for a job interview versus casually for a party, indicating respect for the formality of the situation.

Equality: Uniforms or a strict dress code can reduce socioeconomic disparities by decreasing the visible differences in students' attire, promoting a more inclusive environment.

Safety: Dress codes can enhance safety by prohibiting clothing that displays inappropriate symbolism or that could incite discrimination, as evidenced by the case in Burleson High School, Texas, where Confederate flag imagery on purses was deemed to violate the dress code.

On the other hand, some argue that dress codes can restrict personal expression and may inadvertently perpetuate gender stereotypes. The evolving norms, such as the increasing acceptance of casual attire in educational settings in some cultures, reflect these concerns. Ultimately, whether dress codes are appropriate may depend on the cultural context and the values a particular educational institution wishes to uphold.

Answer:

All of the above

Explanation:

They create a long list, They slow down the reader as they pause at each comma, They emphasize how many crazy things were built in the house are the commas affect your reading fluency. Hence, option D is correct.

The capacity to read quickly, accurately, and correctly is known as fluency. Children must be able to read smoothly, whether they are reading loudly or silently, in order to comprehend what they read.

The capacity to read a text quickly is known as reading fluency. The four components of reading fluency are accuracy, speed, expression, and comprehension. Although each component is crucial, none of them is sufficient on its own. All four components of fluency can be coordinated by a fluent reader.

Because it creates a link between word recognition and comprehension, fluency is significant. It gives them the chance to concentrate on what the text is saying. They can draw parallels between what they are reading and their prior knowledge.

Thus, option D is correct.

For more information about reading fluency, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/23761870

#SPJ2

Answer:

The energy conversion when a solar cell is used to light a street lamp is Option B: solar energy - electric energy - light and heat energy

Explanation:

From the 'Law of conservation' of energy, energy cannot be 'created' nor it can be destroyed. But we can convert energy from 'one form' to 'other'. The devices that transform energy from one form to another are called transducers.  

'Solar cells' also known as  the photo voltaic cells. These devices transform light energy into electrical energy directly. When these solar cells are used in a street lamp, it will convert this electrical energy into heat and light energy.

Solar cells convert solar energy into electrical energy through the photovoltaic effect, which then powers street lamps to produce light and heat energy.

The correct answer to the question of which energy conversion takes place when a solar cell is used to light a street lamp is OB. solar energy - electric energy - light and heat energy. When sunlight, or solar energy, hits a photovoltaic cell, an energy transformation occurs. The photovoltaic effect within the solar cell converts solar energy directly into electrical energy. This electrical energy is then used to power the street lamp, producing light and some heat as byproducts of the lamp's operation.

The elements that make literary analysis are :

Explanation:

All these elements are required in a literary analysis to make anyone understand how and why a particular poem or short story or prose or novel was understand. To understand the meaning in between the lines as well as the conceptual theories behind the literary work.

In general, wordplay is a way authors add wit or humor to their writing. Some experts may argue that this can be inappropriate or detract from serious subjects. They support their claim by referring to specific instances within the text where the wordplay seems to be in breach of the tone or severity of the situation.

Without access to the specific essay, I can offer a general definition and approach to the situation. Wordplay in literature refers to the clever and innovative use of language, often involving puns, wit, or other forms of language manipulation. The experts' arguments against the wordplay may suggest that it is inappropriate or detracts from the subject matter in some way. For example, they may argue that it risks trivializing serious topics or disrupting narrative flow.

Experts generally bolster an author's claim by providing outside evidence or corroboration. For instance, if a literary critic argues that Boyne's wordplay is inappropriate, they might support this claim by citing passages where the wordplay seems to offer humor in otherwise serious contexts, thereby underscoring their point.

https://brainly.com/question/29358163

#SPJ12

The correct interpretation of the question is that it asks for an identification of the wordplay used by John Boyne in his Counterpoint essays, the arguments made by experts regarding this wordplay, and how these experts' arguments support the author's claim.

In John Boyne's Counterpoint essays, the wordplay in question involves his use of the term Holocaust to refer to events other than the systematic persecution and extermination of Jews and other minority groups by the Nazi regime during World War II.

Boyne criticizes the use of the term Holocaust in contexts unrelated to the historical event, such as in discussions about animal rights or other tragedies. He argues that such usage dilutes the term and disrespects the memory of the victims of the actual Holocaust.

Experts weighing in on this issue typically argue that language is dynamic and that words can evolve to take on new meanings and applications over time. They may contend that the use of Holocaust in a broader sense can raise awareness about other instances of mass suffering and can serve as a powerful rhetorical tool to convey the gravity of those situations.

These experts help the author support his claim by providing a counterpoint to Boyne's argument. By presenting the perspective that wordplay and the evolution of language can be appropriate and even necessary for communication and understanding in a changing world, they highlight the complexity of the issue.

The author can then use these expert opinions to demonstrate the existence of a debate surrounding the appropriateness of such wordplay, thereby reinforcing the significance of his own stance on the matter.

To support this answer with textual evidence, one would need to reference specific passages from Boyne's essays and the responses from experts. For example, Boyne might argue that The Holocaust was a unique event in history and should not be compared to anything else, let alone used metaphorically (hypothetical quote).

In contrast, an expert might argue that Language adapts to the needs of its users, and the extension of the term 'Holocaust' can serve to highlight the severity of other human or animal tragedies (hypothetical expert opinion). By juxtaposing these viewpoints, the author can illustrate the tension between preserving the historical specificity of the term Holocaust and the natural evolution of language.

Building your vocabulary (Option D) is crucial for enhancing communication skills by enabling precise expression, comprehension, and engagement with various types of communication.

D. Building your vocabulary is essential for developing better communication skills. A robust vocabulary allows you to express yourself more precisely and effectively, conveying your thoughts and ideas with clarity. When you have a wide range of words at your disposal, you can choose the most appropriate ones to tailor your message to your audience, whether you're speaking or writing. Additionally, a diverse vocabulary enables you to comprehend and engage with various types of communication, including literature, academic texts, and professional documents.

Furthermore, having a purpose for your reading complements vocabulary building by enhancing your understanding and retention of new words. When you read with intent, whether it's to learn, gather information, or enjoy a story, you actively engage with the text, which can deepen your comprehension and expand your vocabulary in context. By associating words with specific meanings and contexts, you're more likely to remember them and incorporate them into your own communication.

While understanding phonetics can aid in pronunciation and articulation, and using symbols can sometimes facilitate communication, they are not as fundamental to developing strong communication skills as building your vocabulary and reading with purpose. Phonetics and symbols may be helpful in specific contexts or for specific purposes, but a robust vocabulary and purposeful reading are more universally applicable and impactful in improving overall communication abilities.

Complete question :-

Which of these will help you develop better communication skills?

A. Understanding phonetics

B. Having a purpose for your reading

C. Using more symbols

D. Building your vocabulary

Answer:

The country was in such disarray because rivals battled in order to have the chance to be the next ruler when "Uther Pendragon" died.

Explanation:

Merlin is an important character in the legendary story about "King Arthur and his Excalibur." He was King Arthur's most trusted friend who was also a magician.

Uther Pendragon was a King of sub-Roman Britain. He's also considered as the father of King Arthur (through an illegitimate conception aided by Merlin). When he died, many battles emerged owing to the fact that they wanted to be crowned as the next ruler. The chaos was seen to have no end, unless a King would be crowned.

Merlin and the archbishop came to terms that whoever pulled the sword, which was known as "Excalibur," would be fit to be the King. Then came Arthur who pulled the sword and thus, he was dubbed as the next king. The king who placed an end to the chaos.

Answer:

pinch pot

Explanation:

pinch pot, which i assume you already know, is an implitical verb which means that this has multiple implitications such as urgency

Answer:

Your answer would be "the creativity, collaboration, and critical thinking"

Explanation:

PLATO