Answer:
He had a better understanding of the terms than Nanette.
Explanation:
With Nanette, she only used a textbook definition. All she did was highlight the definitions she found in the textbook.
With Nathan, he didn't just stop at knowing the textbook definitions. He thought about its application in his life, relating each defined term to his personal life experiences. He then went the extra mile of relating them to other concepts in the text book.
This means he had a broad understanding of the terms both on a personal level and in relation to other concepts in the chapter. The way he processed and understood the terms will make him recall better in an essay exam.
In developing her speech on scuba diving, Rachael is trying to decide whether or not to tell the audience in her introduction that she has been a diver since she was Freshman in high school. She wonders if this will help or hurt her credibility. What textbook advice applies here?
A) Rachael should avoid describing her experience with the topic because she will appear to be speaker centered and not audience centered.
B) Rachael should give a brief, credibility-building explanation of her experience with the topic.
C) Rachael should give a full explanation of her experiences with the topic, including when she started diving, how many years she's diving, how often she dives, etc.
D) For the sake of suspense, Rachael should wait until her conclusion to describe her diving experience.
Answer: B) Rachael should give a brief, credibility-building explanation of her experience with the topic.
Explanation: By giving a brief explanation, Rachael avoids appearing speaker-centered and also builds credibility. This makes the audience believe they can trust her. Nobody wants to listen to someone give a speech about a topic they are not familiar with. Establishing that she is an authority on the topic will inspire confidence in her audience and motivate them to listen to her.
Option A, avoiding describing her experience will achieve the opposite of this and she risks the audience losing interest by giving a long detailed explanation of her experiences.
On His Being Arrived to the Age of Twenty-three
by John Milton
How soon hath Time, the subtle thief of youth,
Stolen on his wing my three and twentieth year!
My hasting days fly on with full career,
But my late spring no bud or blossom shew'th.
Perhaps my semblance might deceive the truth,
That I to manhood am arrived so near,
And inward ripeness doth much less appear,
That some more timely-happy spirits indu'th.
Yet be it less or more, or soon or slow,
It shall be still in strictest measure even
To that same lot, however mean or high,
Toward which Time leads me, and the will of Heaven.
All is, if I have grace to use it so,
As ever in my great Task-master's eye.
Which term describes the first eight lines of "On His Being Arrived to the Age of Twenty-three"?
A. volta B. octave
C. sestet D. quatrain
Dominic has found the following information during the research process for his paper:
Building diagrams for a new energy-efficient construction project in his city
A news article detailing five international energy-producing building projects
A design magazine article describing the solar-energy-producing Sun-Moon Mansion
An interview with a landscape architect who designs clean-air plant-based projects for cities
What is the most useful next step in the writing process for Dominic?
Answer:
Refine his research question and look for more focused resources.
Explanation:
Writing Process is the process that helps a writer to develop his text. This process has certain steps. These are:
Drafting, Outlining, Brainstorming, editing, revising, etc.
In the given case, Dominic has already collected the materials that are required or that he can include in his research paper, that is, brainstorming (interview with an architect), drafting (building diagrams, news article, and a design magazine article).
So, the next step that Dominic needs to do in the writing process is to refine his research. This means that he needs to revise to make his text more reader-centered and focused.
So, the correct answer is to refine his research.
Answer:
It's C
Explanation:
In brave new world how does john respond when bernard suggests that he should be impressed by the speed of the bombay green rocket
Final answer:
John responds to Bernard's suggestion that he should be impressed by the Bombay Green Rocket with disinterest, attributed to his upbringing and differing cultural values in 'Brave New World'.
Explanation:
In Aldous Huxley's Brave New World, John, who is often referred to as 'the Savage' due to his upbringing outside the World State's society, responds to Bernard's suggestion that he should be impressed by the Bombay Green Rocket with a lack of enthusiasm. John, being from a different background, does not hold the same values or awe for technological advancements as those from the World State. His reaction is likely rooted in his unique perspective and exposure to different cultural ideals, which is a recurring theme in the novel as it explores clashes between natural human experiences and a technologically controlled society.
Who invented the telephone?
Answer:
Alexander graham bell
Explanation:
Answer:Alexander Bell
Explanation:
Following is an example of authors' skillful use of modifiers, both single words and phrases. In it, identify the modifier or modifiers, and discuss the effect they create. Then write a sentence or passage of your own, emulating the writer's technique.I realize to my horror that rap music seemingly without melody, sensibility, instruments, verse, or harmony, music with no beginning, end, or middle, music that doesn't even seem to be music rules the world.
Answer:
Without melody;rules the word;even,seemingly,doesn't even seem etc
Explanation:
Modifiers are words, phrase or clause that description to sentence. Modifiers are placed next to the word it describe and it placement creates it possible meanings; modifiers are find right next to either in front of or behind of the words it logically describe
There are two type of modifier: adjective which modify nouns and adverbs which modify other parts of speech. whether adjective or adverbs modifiers helps give meaning to sentence and relieve it narrative.
Here the modifiers:
I realize to my horror that rap music seemingly without melody, sensibility, instruments, verse, or harmony, music with no beginning, end, or middle, music that doesn't even seem to be music rules the world.
To my horror explain the weight of the writer emotion
Without melody (a preposition phrase)is used to cite complaints about rap music
with no beginning, end, or middle is used to note the complaints
Seemingly create doubt, reservation, suspicions
Even( adverb) is used to highlights the verb seem
Rules the world is the weight behind the realization of the impact of rap music
Final answer:
Modifiers are used to enhance sentence meaning by adding information. The author effectively employs modifiers in the passage to convey a critical tone towards rap music without traditional musical elements.
Explanation:
Modifiers are words, phrases, or clauses that add information to a sentence by altering its meaning. In the given excerpt, the author skillfully uses modifiers such as 'seemingly without melody, sensibility, instruments, verse, or harmony' to emphasize the negative impact of rap music. These modifiers create a sense of shock and disbelief in the reader by showcasing the overwhelming dominance of a music genre lacking traditional musical elements.
Which details from the myths support the conclusion that both cultures value children
Answer:
supports conclusion:
children having a role in creation
a child being god of forests
Raven becoming a baby
does not support conclusion:
being aggressive toward parents
a child misbehaving
Stars being created
The two sentences that support the point that both cultures value children are: a) The Haida myth shows Raven taking the shape of a sneaky child and creating light.
d) The Māori myth has Earth Mother and Sky Father create children who become gods of nature.
a) In the Haida myth, the fact that Raven takes on the shape of a baby suggests that the culture values the concept of childhood and sees it as significant enough to be integrated into their mythology. Additionally, the act of Raven creating light after assuming the form of a child implies the transformative power and potential associated with children, aligning with a value placed on them.
d) The Māori myth emphasizes the creation of children who later become gods of nature. This highlights the importance of children not only as creations but also as future leaders and significant figures within their cultural and natural context. The act of Earth Mother and Sky Father creating these children demonstrates a profound regard for the role and potential of offspring, indicative of a cultural emphasis on valuing children.
To know more about Haida myth :
https://brainly.com/question/28205172
#SPJ3
The complete question is,
You identified that these examples support the conclusion that both cultures value children.
-Raven taking the shape of a baby (Haida)
-A child being god of forests and birds (Māori)
Which two sentences support the point that both cultures value children?
a) The Haida myth shows Raven taking the shape of a sneaky child and creating light.
b) The Haida myth tells about a raven that becomes the ultimate creator.
c) The Māori myth uses gods of different parts of nature, including forests and birds.
d) The Māori myth has Earth Mother and Sky Father create children who become gods of nature.
Read the excerpts from Queen Elizabeth's speeches. Excerpts from Queen Elizabeth I speeches. The first is from her Address to the Troops at Tilbury. The second is from her Response to Parliament's Request That She Marry. Which best describes a difference in the types of rhetorical appeals used by Queen Elizabeth in these excerpts from her Address to the Troops at Tilbury and Response to Parliament's Request That She Marry?
Answer:
She used an appeal to pathos when addressing both the troops and members of Parliament.
Explanation:
Although the excerpts are not included with this question, the full text of the speeches can be found online. Moreover, this are the options that come with this question:
She used an appeal to logos when addressing both the troops and members of Parliament.She used an appeal to logos when addressing the troops and an appeal to pathos when addressing Parliament.She used an appeal to pathos when addressing both the troops and members of Parliament.She used an appeal to pathos when addressing the troops and an appeal to logos when addressing Parliament.In her Address to the Troops at Tillbury, Elizabeth uses pathos to appeal to the emotions of the troops. She uses this rhetorical device in order to appeal to the troops' patriotism and sense of responsibility. Similarly, in her Response to Parliament, she uses an appeal to pathos to convince the Parliament that she is a strong and capable ruler regardless of whether she marries or not.
Answer:
D) When speaking to her troops, Queen Elizabeth appeals to pathos to inspire and encourage her army. When speaking to Parliament, Queen Elizabeth appeals to logos to provide rational explanations that convince lawmakers.
Explanation:
corrects on Edg 2020
The reliability of a source is not affected by the
A. writer's professional background.
B. source's authoritativeness.
C. organization of information in the source.
D. source's publication date.
Answer B. source's authoritativeness.
Medical Investigator: "Podiatrists initially assumed that Meyer's Rash, an itchy rash between the toes, was a fungal infection similar to athlete's foot. At first, only Dr. Pannikar argued that Meyer's Rash was viral in nature. All anti-fungal medications proved utterly ineffective in addressing Meyer's Rash. Now, recent antibody studies seem to suggest, quite surprisingly, that Meyer's Rash is caused by a virus."
In the medical investigator's argument, the portion in boldface plays
Answer:
In the medical investigator's argument, this portion:
At first, only Dr. Pannikar argued that Meyer's Rash was viral in nature.
Presents an explanation that the argument concludes is correct.
Explanation:
This is the correct answer as at the time, Dr, Pannikar was the only one giving this explanation, but lately the main conclusion was proven by science.
This judgment does not oppose the argument.
It is not a finding, it is an explanation itself.
It does not provide evidence though, it is only an explanation but it is part of the main conclusion of the argument.
The bolded part of the medical investigator's argument provides the pivotal evidence which supports the conclusion that Meyer's Rash is a viral condition.
Explanation:In the medical investigator's argument, the portion in boldface plays the role of providing evidence, while also stating the conclusion. It's part of the paragraph that introduces a recently discovered fact which supports Dr. Pannikar's viewpoint that Meyer's Rash is viral - not fungal. This information is new evidence that changes the commonly held belief, suggesting that Meyer's Rash is caused by a virus. This conclusion is based on the failed use of anti-fungal medications and is further supported by recent antibody studies.
Learn more about opposite viewpoint :https://brainly.com/question/11520711
#SPJ12
The single-opportunity method of assessing a person's skills on a task analysis means that they only get one chance to demonstrate the skill before instruction begins; whereas with the multiple-opportunity method of assessment, a person's skills are assessed multiple times before instruction begins.True / False.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Single opportunity method is designed to assess a learner's ability to perform each behavior in the task analysis in the correct sequence
Multiple opportunity method is designed to evaluate the person's level of mastery across all behavior in the task analysis in the correct sequence.
Clue words showing that contrasts are being made in this paragraph include:
A. while and however.
B. both and difference.
C. and and similar.
D. also and hand. Clue words showing that contrasts are being made in this paragraph include while and however.
Answer:
A. while and however.
Explanation:
On the WAIS, the _____ score represents subtest scores on verbal tasks, such as vocabulary, comprehension, and general knowledge; the _____ score represents subtest scores on nonverbal tasks, such as identifying missing parts in incomplete pictures, arranging pictures to tell a story, or arranging blocks to match a pattern
This question is incomplete. Its full version is:
On the WAIS, the ................... score represents subtest scores on verbal tasks, such as vocabulary, comprehension, and general knowledge; the ......................score represents subtest scores on nonverbal tasks, such as identifying missing parts in incomplete pictures, arranging pictures to tell a story, or arranging blocks to match a pattern.
A. verbal; performance
B. linguistic; spatial
C. spatial; linguistic
The correct option is A (VERBAL and PERFORMANCE respectively).
The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) was thought to test the cognitive abilities of adults and older adolescents. Since it was released, in 2008 by Pearson, it became one of the most used IQ tests.
Even though our IQ can change over time, our test score tends to be more stable with the passing of time.
Glenn has a cockatiel that he has trained to discriminate between pictures of dogs and cats. He shows the cockatiel a picture of a dog and the bird pecks at a dog symbol on the cage. Glenn shows him a picture of a cat and the bird pecks at a cat symbol. The bird is showing:A. linguistic determinism.B. that it can form concepts.C. telegraphic speech.D. syntactic language.
Final answer:
The cockatiel trained by Glenn is showing that it can form concepts by associating pictures with the corresponding symbols on its cage.
Explanation:
Glenn's cockatiel is demonstrating that it can form concepts. The bird is not engaging in linguistic determinism, telegraphic speech, or syntactic language. Instead, it has learned to associate specific images with distinct responses, indicating a cognitive ability to differentiate between different classes of objects, such as dogs and cats. This ability shows that the bird can mentally categorize and recognize various visual stimuli, a cornerstone of concept formation.
Virtue! a fig! 'tis in ourselves that we are thus or thus. Our bodies are our gardens, to the which our wills are gardeners: so that if we will plant nettles, or sow lettuce, set hyssop and weed up 680 thyme, supply it with one gender of herbs, or distract it with many, either to have it sterile with idleness, or manured with industry, why, the power and corrigible authority of this lies in our wills. If the balance of our lives had not one 685 scale of reason to poise another of sensuality, the blood and baseness of our natures would conduct us to most preposterous conclusions: but we have reason to cool our raging motions, our carnal stings, our unbitted lusts, whereof I take this that 690 you call love to be a sect or scion.
Answer:
The Question is about the character of IAGO and the details about it based on the paragraph given are stated in explanation
Explanation:
The paragraph gives us information about the characterization of IAGO.
Shakespeare gives us the message that IAGO was a man of firm character who would believe that it is totally up to a human on controlling its emotions and making his way out. We must have rational minds to deal with our emotions. One such emotion is love and we should be sensible enough to manage it also, rather giving up on love
Which is the best helping paraphrase response to the following statement? "My boss keeps kidding me about how we should have an affair. I don’t know what to do. Sometimes I think he’s just joking, and sometimes I think it’s a real proposition."1. Either way it's sexual harassment, which is illegal. You shouldn't let him do it.2. So you can't figure out his motives.is that it?3. You sound upset by this.4. You sound worried & confused because you're not sure if he's coming on to you or not?5. That's a common problem these days. I can see why you're upset, and I don't blame you.
Answer:
Explanation:
Thats sexual harassment only if he keeps doing it after you have asked him to stop. If you dont tell him to stop, its not technically harassment
Respond to one of the following prompts in two to three paragraphs.Citing textual evidence from "On the Pulse of Morning" and "One Today:"describe some of the challenges facing the American people during the late 20th and early 21st centuriesor explain the effects of cultural diversity among the American people during the late 20th and early 21st centuries.
Answer:
I was able to deduce most of them by reading the two poems, "On the Pulse of Night" and "One Today." For example, whenever Maya Angelou said'' Women, children, people, take it into your hands ' palms, mold it into the form of your most private need.
Carve it into Your most public self image. Lift your hearts Every new hour presents new opportunities for a new start. To hate, yoked eternally To violence, don't be wedded forever.
"She said we had an issue with dwelling on the past and that we need to get over that because many people worked hard to make our country the way the world is going.
Things like your eyecolor and I are not under your control this is because they are determined by genes so I can't is a good example of an inherited
Answer:
Trait.
Explanation:
'Inherited traits' are described as the characteristics possessed by an individual that he/she has acquired or passed on to him through the genes(DNA). The parents often transfer their numerous traits like hair, complexion, aggressiveness, etc. to their offsprings.
As per the question, features like eye color and height would exemplify 'inherited traits' as they have been influenced by genes that the parents transfer to their child. These traits are transferred from one generation to another as DNA of parents is transferred to the child during reproduction and thus, their features or attributes tend to show a reflection of that. Therefore, 'inherited trait' is the answer.
In developing her speech on scuba diving, Rachael is trying to decide whether or not to tell the audience in her introduction that she has been a diver since she was Freshman in high school. She wonders if this will help or hurt her credibility. What textbook advice applies here?
A) Rachael should avoid describing her experience with the topic because she will appear to be speaker centered and not audience centered.
B) Rachael should give a brief, credibility-building explanation of her experience with the topic.
C) Rachael should give a full explanation of her experiences with the topic, including when she started diving, how many years she's diving, how often she dives, etc.
D) For the sake of suspense, Rachael should wait until her conclusion to describe her diving experience.
Answer:b
Explanation:
In the given excerpt, the correct advice would be “Rachael should give a brief, credibility-building explanation of her experience with the topic.” Therefore, option B is the correct option.
What is credibility-building?
Credibility building is a process of building trust among the people about your skills, points f view, logic, and ultimately, your own self or your personality.
Building credibility is important in order to influence people, especially those working in a field that deals with people, and one needs their support in order to get along in the job or in business.
The right recommendation in the excerpt would be that Rachel "should deliver a brief, credibility-building explanation of her experience with the topic." As a result, choice B is the best one.
Learn more about credibility building here:
https://brainly.com/question/20597905
#SPJ2
the latter. In choosing it, I hoped for greater gain than loss; but of this I was not entirely confident... Yours truly, A. Lincoln Use context to determine the meaning of the phrase in bold
This question is incomplete. Here´s the complete question.
(LC)Letter to a Citizen of Kentucky, an excerpt
Executive Mansion, Washington,
April 4, 1864.
A. G. Hodges, Esq., Frankfort, Ky.
My Dear Sir:
You ask me to put in writing the substance of what I verbally stated the other day, in your presence, to Governor Bramlette and Senator Dixon. It was about as follows:
I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong nothing is wrong. I cannot remember when I did not so think and feel; and yet I have never understood that the Presidency conferred upon me an unrestricted right to act officially in this judgment and feeling. It was in the oath I took that I would to the best of my ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. I could not take the office without taking the oath. Nor was it in my view that I might take the oath to get power, and break the oath in using the power.
I understood, too, that in ordinary civil administration this oath even forbade me to practically indulge my primary abstract judgment on the moral question of slavery. I had publicly declared this many times and in many ways; and I aver that, to this day I have done no official act in mere deference to my abstract judgment and feeling on slavery. I did understand, however, that my oath to preserve the Constitution to the best of my ability imposed upon me the duty of preserving, by every indispensable means, that government, that nation, of which that Constitution was the organic law. Was it possible to lose the nation, and yet preserve the Constitution?
By general law, life and limb must be protected; yet often a limb must be amputated to save a life, but a life is never wisely given to save a limb. I felt that measures, otherwise unconstitutional, might become lawful by becoming indispensable to the preservation of the Constitution through the preservation of the nation. Right or wrong, I assumed this ground, and now avow it. I could not feel that to the best of my ability I had even tried to preserve the Constitution, if, to save slavery, or any minor matter, I should permit the wreck of government, country, and Constitution altogether.
When, early in the war, General Fremont attempted military emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not then think it an indispensable necessity. When, a little later, General Cameron, then Secretary of War, suggested the arming of the blacks, I objected, because I did not yet think it an indispensable necessity. When, still later, General Hunter attempted military emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not yet think the indispensable necessity had come. When, in March and May and July, 1862, I made earnest and successive appeals to the Border States to favor compensated emancipation, I believed the indispensable necessity for military emancipation and arming the blacks would come, unless averted by that measure. They declined the proposition; and I was, in my best judgment, driven to the alternative of either surrendering the Union, and with it the Constitution, or of laying strong hand upon the colored element. I chose the latter. In choosing it, I hoped for greater gain than loss; but of this I was not entirely confident…
Yours truly,
A. Lincoln
Use context to determine the meaning of the phrase in bold.
I have ascertained that
I can confirm that
I will instruct you that
I hope to learn that
Answer: I can confirm that
Explanation:
Aver means to positively declare something. It has the "truth" root, so it essentially refers to "confirm as true". We aver something that we're sure of.
Lincoln explains that he knows his political position doesn´t allow him to impose his ideas on slavery. He states that he can positively confirm that he hasn´t done that because even if he made his position about slavery publicly known, he hasn´t made any official act to end slavery by force.
Answer:
I beleive it is D, but it might also be B. I'm taking the test right now.
Full question:
(LC)Letter to a Citizen of Kentucky, an excerpt
Executive Mansion, Washington,
April 4, 1864.
A. G. Hodges, Esq., Frankfort, Ky.
My Dear Sir:
You ask me to put in writing the substance of what I verbally stated the other day, in your presence, to Governor Bramlette and Senator Dixon. It was about as follows:
I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong nothing is wrong. I cannot remember when I did not so think and feel; and yet I have never understood that the Presidency conferred upon me an unrestricted right to act officially in this judgment and feeling. It was in the oath I took that I would to the best of my ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. I could not take the office without taking the oath. Nor was it in my view that I might take the oath to get power, and break the oath in using the power.
I understood, too, that in ordinary civil administration this oath even forbade me to practically indulge my primary abstract judgment on the moral question of slavery. I had publicly declared this many times and in many ways; and I aver that, to this day I have done no official act in mere deference to my abstract judgment and feeling on slavery. I did understand, however, that my oath to preserve the Constitution to the best of my ability imposed upon me the duty of preserving, by every indispensable means, that government, that nation, of which that Constitution was the organic law. Was it possible to lose the nation, and yet preserve the Constitution?
By general law, life and limb must be protected; yet often a limb must be amputated to save a life, but a life is never wisely given to save a limb. I felt that measures, otherwise unconstitutional, might become lawful by becoming indispensable to the preservation of the Constitution through the preservation of the nation. Right or wrong, I assumed this ground, and now avow it. I could not feel that to the best of my ability I had even tried to preserve the Constitution, if, to save slavery, or any minor matter, I should permit the wreck of government, country, and Constitution altogether.
When, early in the war, General Fremont attempted military emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not then think it an indispensable necessity. When, a little later, General Cameron, then Secretary of War, suggested the arming of the blacks, I objected, because I did not yet think it an indispensable necessity. When, still later, General Hunter attempted military emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not yet think the indispensable necessity had come. When, in March and May and July, 1862, I made earnest and successive appeals to the Border States to favor compensated emancipation, I believed the indispensable necessity for military emancipation and arming the blacks would come, unless averted by that measure. They declined the proposition; and I was, in my best judgment, driven to the alternative of either surrendering the Union, and with it the Constitution, or of laying strong hand upon the colored element. I chose the latter. In choosing it, I hoped for greater gain than loss; but of this I was not entirely confident...
Yours truly,
A. Lincoln
Use context to determine the meaning of the words in bold.
Laws that relate to science
Basic principles and rules
Questionable decisions
Rules of society
Choose the pair of words that is the most similar to the relationship in the box.
sponge: porous
A.
water: flow
B.
aluminum: lightweight
C.
automobile: gasoline
D.
holy: respect
Intuition is defined as an insight that just seems to be true or correct. Intuition is not the result of a mental process that can be taken apart and examined.True / False.
Answer:
The answer is TRUE.
Explanation:
'Intuition' is a Latin verb translated to English as 'consider', that refers to the acquirement of certain knowledge and grasping it perfectly, without the need for a proper conscious reasoning of it. According to different writers, the word 'Intuition' relates to the inner-sensing, unconscious knowledge and/or understanding instinctively.
Intuition in philosophy is described as immediate and clear insight, not just a gut feeling so the sentence provided in the question is true.
Intuition is a form of insight that is perceived to be inherently true without the need for further analysis. It is not a result of a breakable mental process but rather an immediate understanding.
When philosophers refer to intuition, they mean a clear and definite understanding, not just a 'gut feeling.' The truth of mathematical equations like 2 + 2 = 4 serves as a prime example of intuitive knowledge.
Intuition plays a crucial role in decision-making, art creation, relationship choices, and spiritual exploration, showcasing its significance beyond traditional reasoning.
When a child utters the word "mama," it may signify meanings as varied as "There goes Mama," "Come here, Mama," and "You are my Mama." Such single words used by children to express complex meanings are known as _________.
Answer:
- Holophrases.
Explanation:
As per the question, the child uses single word like 'mama' to convey various complex meanings like 'Come here, Mama', 'You are my Mama', etc. exemplify that he is using 'holophrases' while learning to speak the language. Such phrases(holophrases) do not possess a grammatical intent but a simple vocalization that the child crams while learning and uses in order to convey his thought through that specific single word. Thus, 'holophrases' is the correct answer.
Answer:
yo mama so fat thanos had to snap twice
Explanation:
Upon whom does Lincoln cast blame for the civil war and to what effect? A. Lincoln blames the Confederate States, particularly those states that first seceded, for refusing to negotiate. B. Lincoln does not actively blame anyone for the civil war, likely to avoid future hostility, but points to the institution of slavery as the cause of the war. C. Lincoln does not actively blame either side; rather he blames individual supporters of slavery, thus emphasizing the evils of the institution of slavery. D. Lincoln blames divine intervention for this war, for he sees the civil war as a form of senseless violence caused by an angry God.
Answer:
B. Lincoln does not actively blame anyone for the civil war, likely to avoid future hostility, but points to the institution of slavery as the cause of the war.
Explanation:
President Lincoln recognized the fact that slavery was a key factor leading to the Civil War. However, he was careful not to blame the southerners for the severe consequences of the Civil War.
Abraham Lincoln was cautious in assigning blame for the Civil War, focusing on the preservation of the Union and the moral issues surrounding slavery. Initial reluctance to ascribe fault evolved as the war progressed, with Lincoln's policies and the Union's fighting efforts reflecting a shift towards ending slavery in addition to reunification.
Explanation:When considering President Abraham Lincoln's view on the blame for the Civil War, it's critical to assess his stance on secession and the underlying causes of the conflict. Upon reviewing Lincoln's speeches and policies, we can conclude that he exercised caution in placing outright blame for the Civil War on any particular group. He emphasized the preservation of the Union as his principal goal rather than focusing on the abolition of slavery, at least in the early years of his presidency.
Throughout the period leading up to the war and his presidency, Lincoln stressed the moral wrongness of slavery, but also recognized the complexity of immediate abolition. The division between the North and South had been escalating for decades over issues such as states' rights and slavery, particularly with the idea of its expansion into new territories. While Lincoln's election acted as a catalyst, it was not the sole cause of the war. The blame for the Civil War can be observed more as an accumulation of unresolved tensions and the failure of last-minute compromises, such as the Crittenden proposal and the Corwin Amendment, than as the fault of a specific person or entity.
After the South initiated hostilities by attacking Fort Sumter in April 1861, Lincoln took more definitive action but continued to frame the war as a fight to preserve the Union. It was only as the war progressed, notably with the issuance of the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, that the conflict also became explicitly a war to end slavery. Thus, Lincoln's approach to casting blame for the war was prudent and aimed at national healing and reintegration, without singling out the Confederate States or its individuals unfairly.
Think about "April 1861: The War Begins." Why did Alexander Hamilton Stephens believe that President Lincoln had "made the use of force necessary"?
Answer:
This is because, President Lincoln has to interven after the fall of the fall of Fort Sumter of Carolina to the Union Confederates.
Explanation:
When the Fort of Sumter was captured, the President was jittery that the country was going to be divided and lose out on its unity stand just because of the slave trade issue.
He was so determined not to be remembered as the president that did nothing when secession plans where carried out by slave trade inclined States and to upholds the American constitution that, he has to take drastic action. Abraham Lincoln has no other option than to issue a proclamation calling for 75,000 volunteer soldiers to quell the Southern “insurrection.”
This use of force was necessary because, it finally lead to the crushing of the dissenting states and unification of all the states together under one country.
How do details such as "stone or metal," "many pigeons," "towers," and "wild cats that roam the god-roads" help establish setting? They create a feeling of a small mythical kingdom. They build an atmosphere of a preindustrial society. They give the sense that nature has taken over a once-urban area. They develop the feeling of an ancient village of a polytheistic culture.
Answer:
The sense that nature has taken over a once-urban area.
Explanation:
Mythical kingdom is possible (towers & god-roads) but a small mythical kingdom doesn´t make sense to me.
A preindustrial society is said to be in harmony with nature.
The feeling of an ancient village is not provoked by towers; that word, together with stone or metal could show a once-urban area that has been taken over by nature (wild cats that roam... many pigeons)
These details help create the feeling that nature has taken over a once urban area, as shown in the third option.
Why are these details important?Because they create an ambiance in the text.Because they are immersive and create mental images in readers.Because they emphasize the topic of the text.This question refers to the short story "By the Waters of Babylon" which shows a city that after being destroyed was taken over by nature and completely changed.
Learn more about "By the Waters of Babylon" at the link:
https://brainly.com/question/11285965
#SPJ2
#1.)Which sentence best summarizes the passage?
Thomas Gradgrind explains how nothing but facts is wanted to educate young children properly.
Mr. Gradgrind, who wants nothing but facts, introduces himself to his classroom and tells a student what to call herself.
Thomas Gradgrind speaks to his classroom, explaining the need for facts and calculations, scales and multiplication tables.
Mr. Gradgrind looks are as harsh as his words: he has a square forehead and a thin, hard-set mou
#2.What central idea does the text present about school in the time and place of this novel?
It is place where students often do not learn facts.
It is a place where all the teachers are misguided.
It can be a miserable place with the wrong teacher.
It can be a place where poor children learn to leave poverty behind.
#3.Which detail best shows Mr. Gradgrind’s attitude toward education?
He sees the students as having the “minds of reasoning animals.”
He sees the students as “little vessels” to pour facts into.
He sees the schoolroom as a place to underscore “every sentence with a line.”
He sees the schoolroom as a place to substitute the words “‘boys and girls’ for ‘sir.’”
#4.Which detail from the passage best shows the setting and the theme?
a plain, bare, monotonous vault
an inflexible, dry, and dictatorial voice
imperial gallons of facts
any parcel of human nature
Answer:
1)Mr Grandgrind, who wants nothing but facts, introduces himself to his classroom and tells a student what to call herself
2)it is a place where often do not learn facts
3)He sees the schoolroom as a place to substitute the words "boys and girls" for "sir"
4) a plain, bare, monotous vault
How many copies of Brain Friction Wondering of the Mind by Artwoodwrite sold and your sources please
Answer:
The number of copies sold is statistically difficult to determine.
Explanation:
The determination of the number of books sold by a particular author is a difficult task going by the fact that, most of the sale are made online and at various stores. Most of the customers that bought the books hardly leave feedback which would have aided in compiling the total number.
Also, some are sold as hard copies at various stores available within the author's country of residence and outside of it.
In summary, while looking at the Amazon website, I am optimistic that the author, Artwoodwrite was able to sell a substantial amount of the book Brain friction (Wondering of the mind).
Choose whether the following phrase is part of a position or a reason.
...people should drive eco-friendly cars...
a. position
b. reason
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
OA
OB
Answer:
A
Explanation:
edge
The global economic crisis following World War I was caused by
widespread unemployment.
unpaid WWI debts.
the Great Depression.
overspeculation.
It’s not c
Answer:
Unpaid WWI debts.
Explanation:
During WWI, USA loaned money to Allies such as United Kingdom, France, Belgium etc, so they can provide themselves with weaponry and other war material. After the war was finished, Allies were broke and they were not in the situation to pay back loans and they relied on Germany who had the obligation to pay the reparation costs for all the damage in WWI. But Germany was in a bad situation too, so they lent money from the USA so they can meet its obligations. So all ll of them were sucked into this vicious circle. USA also collapsed thanks to loans of these two sides. Germany was pressed to come up with the money, but its industry was shut down, they tried to solve this problem by printing a lot of money, but that only caused hyperinflation. So, as Hoover said: We are now faced with the problem, not of saving Germany or Britain, but of saving ourselves.
Answer:
unpaid WWI debts.
Explanation:
i got it right