Options:
A: A balanced federal budget
B. Farm price support
C. Federal aide to Corporations
D. A program of public works
E. Federal relief to Individuals
Answer: E: Federal relief to Individuals
Explanation: Franklin Delano Roosevelt was the thirty-second president of the United States of America,he is a famous politician, who served as a Governor between 1929 to 1933,his performance as Governor where he worked to help the United States come out the Economic hardships of that time helped him to win the Presidential election,he defeated Herbert Hoover in a landslide.
FRANKLIN DELANO ROOSEVELT AND HERBERT HOOVER DISAGREED MOST STRONGLY ABOUT THE DESIRABILITY of FEDERAL RELIEF TO INDIVIDUALS.
A. a balanced federal budget
B. farm price supports
C. federal aid to corporations
D. a program of public works
E. federal relief to individuals.
Learn more:
https://brainly.com/question/7214781
The constitutional principle of judicial review provides
Answer:
Power of the court to determine constitutionality of a government action.
Explanation: Judicial review is a process that takes place in a Democratic Government, where the courts are empowered to be able to evaluate and review the activities of Government and other parties with the aim of ensuring that justice prevails. Judicial review proves that and every other person or organisation is restricted in what it may do as it regards the law and every person has rights which the government or any other party cannot take away from them.
The constitutional principle of judicial review provides that the judiciary, particularly in the United States, has the authority to review and assess the constitutionality of laws, acts, and government actions.
This power, established by landmark cases such as Marbury v. Madison in 1803, allows the judiciary to declare laws or actions unconstitutional and, as a result, null and void. Judicial review is a fundamental element of the system of checks and balances, ensuring that the legislative and executive branches of government operate within the bounds of the constitution.
It helps safeguard individual rights and uphold the rule of law. It serves as a critical mechanism for protecting citizens' rights and limiting potential government overreach by ensuring that all actions align with the constitution's provisions.
Know more about judicial review here
https://brainly.com/question/28179489
#SPJ12
PLEASE NEED HELP ANYONE IN LAW THAT CAN HELP ME WITHT THIS 2 QUESTIONS ? !!!!!
1. A client is charged with driving under the influence. He claims that he had only one beer. He registers a 1.0 on the breathalyzer. Your supervising attorney wants you to research the case and see if the client can be convicted of DUI.
To find the latest cases on this subject, Researcher A says you should check the pocket parts to the digests. Researcher B says you should check the advance sheets. Which researcher is correct?
A. Researcher A is correct.
B. Neither researcher is correct.
C. Both researchers are correct.
2. A client is charged with driving under the influence. He claims that he had only one beer. He registers a 1.0 on the breathalyzer. Your supervising attorney wants you to research the case and see if the client can be convicted of DUI.
Bob is looking for helpful material for this case and has already looked at cases, statutes, and administrative regulations. Which of the following would be least helpful to Bob in finding materials for this case?
A. Treatises
B. Practice guides
C. Out-of-state cases
Answer:
1.c
Explanation:
so they can check what hes done
Antitrust laws are designed to: promote monopoly practices. promote competition. increase prices. decrease output. promote awareness of government programs.
Answer:
That is not a qusetion
Explanation:
Assuming that everything else is equal, a bond issued by the government of Japan most likely pays a lower ______ interest rate than a bond issued by a government that is engaged in a civil war.
Assuming that everything else is equal, a bond issued by a government that is engaged in a civil war most likely pays a Lower Interest Rate than a bond issued by the government of Japan.
Explanation:
An interest rate is the amount of or the percentage of principal charged by the lender for the usage of his money.
The principal is the amount of money loaned by the lender or a bank . Since banks borrow money from you (in the form of deposits), they also pay you an interest rate on your money.
Assuming that everything else is equal, a bond issued by a government that is engaged in a civil war most likely pays a Lower Interest Rate than a bond issued by the government of Japan.
What purpose does a grand jury or preliminary hearing serve in adjudicating felony offenses? Should one of these methods be abandoned? If so, which one?
When a felony case arises, an arrest or a criminal complaint is not enough to require the defendant to stand for trial. Before the defendant is required to do so, the court must conduct either a preliminary hearing or a grand jury.
A preliminary hearing occurs when a judge hears the evidence and decides whether there is sufficient evidence to require the defendant to stand trial. Otherwise, the judge must dismiss the charges. An alternative to this is the use of a grand jury. In these cases, the prosecutor presents evidence to a jury made up of members of the public, who then decide whether there is probable cause. I believe that a preliminary hearing is important and should be kept, but that a grand jury is not an institution that needs to be protected. In a grand jury, the jury is not knowledgeable of the law, and no judge is present, which makes its ruling more unreliable.
The purpose of a grand jury or preliminary hearing in the adjudication of felony offenses is to determine whether there is probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed and that the individual accused of the crime is the one who committed it. This serves as a check on the power of the prosecution and helps to ensure that individuals are not unjustly subjected to a full trial without sufficient evidence.
A grand jury is a group of citizens who review evidence presented by the prosecution in secret proceedings to decide whether to indict a suspect and proceed to trial. The grand jury process is generally used in federal courts and in some states within the United States. It provides a layer of civilian oversight and can serve to protect citizens from unfounded prosecution.
A preliminary hearing, on the other hand, is a judicial proceeding where a judge determines whether there is probable cause to believe that a felony has been committed and that the defendant committed it. This hearing is less formal than a trial and typically occurs shortly after an individual is charged. It allows the defense to cross-examine witnesses and challenge the evidence presented by the prosecution.
Whether one of these methods should be abandoned is a matter of legal debate. Proponents of the grand jury system argue that it allows for civilian participation in the justice system and can act as a buffer between the government and the accused. Critics argue that grand juries are too secretive and that the lack of transparency can lead to a lack of accountability. They also point out that grand juries rarely decline to indict, which may not serve as an effective check on prosecutorial power.
Preliminary hearings, while more transparent, can be seen as duplicative when a grand jury has already determined probable cause. However, they provide an early opportunity for the defense to confront witnesses and gather information, which can be crucial for preparing a defense.
Given the unique benefits and drawbacks of each system, it is not straightforward to argue that one should be abandoned entirely. Instead, reforms could be considered to address the concerns associated with each method. For example, some jurisdictions have moved away from grand juries in favor of preliminary hearings, while others have implemented reforms to make grand jury proceedings more transparent and to provide defendants with greater rights.
In conclusion, both grand juries and preliminary hearings serve important functions in the adjudication of felony offenses. Rather than abandoning one method entirely, it may be more beneficial to consider reforms that enhance the fairness, transparency, and effectiveness of each process.
Long-arm statutes: a. give state courts automatic jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants. b. have been ruled unconstitutional. c. are simply procedural statutes that still require "minimum contacts" for use. d. none of the above
Answer:
a. give state courts automatic jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants.Explanation:
Long-arm statutes are laws that allow state courts to acquire automatic jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants. The courts can apprehend an out-of-state defendant based on certain actions which have connections with the concerned state.The provisions of a long-arm statute normally grants a state court the right to jurisdiction over a non-state domicile if the individual has minimum connection within the state's court jurisdiction.Which amendments to the constitution does not address or guarantee voting rights?
Answer:
7th Amendment
Explanation:
The 7th Amendment to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. This amendment codifies the right to a jury trial in certain civil cases and inhibits courts from overturning a jury's findings of fact. This amendment to the United States constitution does not address or guarantee voting rights.
The basic purpose of tort law is to punish criminal wrongdoers.
Answer: True
Explanation:
The primary purpose of tort law is to provide relief to the affected parties as compensation for the harm caused to the others. It emphasis the imposing liabilities on the parties and also to prevent others from committing harmful acts.
The tort law shifts the burden of the loss from the affected party to the party who has committed the tort. The crime committed against the party being affected is compensated through monetary submission.
The law of ______ was developed in response to the notion that every person has a responsibilty to look after his own safety, and should not be able to place the blame on someone else.
Answer:
The law of health and safety
Explanation:
The law of health and safety at work was passed into law via the health and safety act of 1974. this act ensures that every employer of labor whether self employed or not is responsible for ensuring the safety of its workers by providing them with all the necessary information on how to work safely at work places.
The act also provides room for a person to take responsibility for his own safety and not blame anybody when he or she fails to take the necessary safety precautions been provided by the employer while performing their duties.
James Keller was an employee at Radical Boards, Inc. Radical Boards is a surf and skateboard shop that also sells clothing. While employed there, Radical Board's principal shareholder discovered that Keller had created peep holes in the shop's dressing rooms. When confronted with the peep holes, Keller denied every using them and indicated that they were there to prevent shoplifting. The shop manager was told to fire Keller. Shortly after Keller left, a 16-year-old and her mother filed suit because the teen learned, through conversations with Keller, that he had seen her in the dressing room while she was trying on swimming suits. Keller was able to describe her not-generally-seen birthmarks to her. Radical Boards: a. cannot be held liable to the teen and her mother because it did engage in the conduct. b. could be held liable under a theory of negligent failure to supervise. c. is no longer liable because it terminated Keller. d. has not committed any tort because watching customers in dressing rooms in part of a merchant's right. e. none of the above
Answer:
b. could be held liable under a theory of negligent failure to supervise.
Explanation:
In this example, Radical Boards, Inc. could be held liable under a theory of negligent failure to supervise. It is clear in this example that Radical Boards was not aware initially of the fact that Keller had created and utilized the peep holes. However, it was nevertheless their duty to supervise their employees. This can be considered negligent supervision. Negligent supervision occurs when a person is meant to supervise others, but fails to do so in a responsible manner. This can include the supervision of employees.
Radical Boards could be held liable for negligent failure to supervise James Keller, which resulted in violation of customer privacy. Employers are responsible under the law to provide a safe environment and prevent wrongful acts by employees. The concept is akin to the responsibility of a babysitter to watch over children, where failure to supervise can lead to serious consequences.
Explanation:The liability of Radical Boards for the actions of their employee James Keller could be established under a theory of negligent failure to supervise. Given the circumstances where Keller created peep holes in the dressing rooms, his culpability and Radical Boards' potential negligence come into play. The employer has a duty to provide a safe environment for their customers and to supervise their employees effectively to prevent any wrongful acts. In this case, the employer could be held liable if it is proven that they failed to supervise Keller adequately, which resulted in violating the privacy of customers.
To draw parallels, consider the cited case of Elauf, where Abercrombie was found in violation of Title VII for not accommodating Elauf's religious practices. Although the case deals with discrimination rather than customer privacy, it emphasizes the responsibilities of employers under the law.
Going further, the counter example with Susan the babysitter serves to illustrate how an individual responsible for the care and supervision of others may be held accountable for neglecting that duty. Similarly, if an employer does not take reasonable measures to supervise their employees, it can lead to legal consequences if harm results from that failure.
What allows SCOTUS's interpretation of law to override the interpretation of all other courts in the United States?
Answer:
Appellate Jurisdiction.Explanation:
Appellate Jurisdiction as provided in the Article III of the Constitution grants the Supreme Court the power to review and hear appeals from the lower courts through the order of an appellate court.Appellate jurisdiction also includes Supreme Court's power to overturn or modify the interpretations and decisions made by other lower courts in the United States.The appeals are usually brought before the Supreme Court through the writ of certiorari.Summarize the different attitudes toward law in the Near East and Egypt. Use your readings from Hammurabi and Hittite law codes in your answer. Is there some reason we have no surviving law code from Egypt? Why or why not?
Answer: The two parties are unable to communicate.
Explanation:
A health faddist, who is "sunbathing" on a secluded beach is liable to prosecution for the section on indecent exposure.
Answer:No , S(he) is not liable to prosecution for indecent exposure
Explanation:What is indecent exposure? Indecent exposure refers to an act of exposing your whole body or part of your body in public where this exposure considered morally wrong or socially unacceptable in that local area .
Indecent exposure differs from state to state based on what laws of that society and community consider to be indecent exposure.
This may be based on religious morals and standards ,tradition or just what society consider as a norm in maintaining social order.
When someone is at the beach it is expected that they are likely to be half naked or in some cases even fully naked , so sunbathing at the beach is expected and can't be an insult to the public .
Tanning poses health risks due to overexposure to UV B rays that can cause skin damage and increase the risk of skin cancer. Using high SPF sunscreens and protective measures can reduce these risks. Drinking water and taking safety measures is also crucial.
Explanation:Tanning is often sought after for aesthetic reasons, but it can come with significant health risks, particularly when done without proper precautions. The primary concern with tanning is the overexposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Specifically, UV B rays, with wavelengths between 280-320 nm, are especially harmful as they have the potential to cause immediate skin damage such as sunburns and, over time, increase the likelihood of developing skin cancer. It's important to recognize that tanning, whether on the beach or through artificial means, must be approached with caution. Using sunscreens with high SPF can significantly reduce the risks by protecting the skin from the harmful effects of these rays. Taking additional safeguards, such as wearing protective clothing, a hat, and seeking shade during peak sun exposure times, can further enhance protection against skin damage. Moreover, ensuring hydration with plenty of water and taking emergency precautions are essential for overall safety while enjoying outdoor activities.
The supreme court has refused to define the term republican form of government because
Answer:
because, the court believes the issue is political rather than legal and should be handled by state and national government.
Explanation:
A republican form of government is one in which the political authority that is operational comes from the people. As seen in the United States of America, power is given to the government of the area by the citizens through its elected representatives. This is visibly spelt out in the constitution of the country and the third president of the U.S, Thomas Jefferson, asked the colonists at that time to move away from monarchy and become republican citizens themselves.
The supreme court of the country decided not to get involved in the definition of the term “republican form of government” because they rightly see the issue to be political in nature rather than legal and they expect the state and national government to handle it.
The Supreme Court has refused to define the term 'Republican form of government' because it is a complex and subjective concept, which allows for flexibility and adaptability. Instead, the Court focuses on interpreting and applying the principles and provisions of the Constitution to protect individual rights and maintain the separation of powers.
Explanation:The Supreme Court has refused to define the term Republican form of government because it is a complex and subjective concept that can have different interpretations. By not providing a specific definition, the Court allows for flexibility and adaptability as society and governance evolve.
Additionally, defining a specific form of government could hinder the ability of Congress and the Executive branch to make decisions and implement policies, as it could be seen as infringing on their powers.
Instead, the Court has focused on interpreting and applying the principles and provisions of the Constitution to ensure the protection of individual rights, promote democratic processes, and maintain the separation of powers.
Learn more about Supreme Court and Republican form of government here:https://brainly.com/question/11245869
#SPJ12
What approach did the framers of the constitution use to limit the powers of the national government
Explanation:
in order to modify the separation of powers, the framers created a best-known system, checks and balances. In this system, powers are shared among the three branches of government. At the same time, the powers of one branch can be challenged by another branch.
Final answer:
The framers of the Constitution limited the powers of the national government through separation of powers, enumerated powers, and prohibitions on certain types of legislation. They established a federal republic that balances national and state authorities, integrating principles like popular sovereignty and limited government to protect citizens' liberties.
Explanation:
Approach to Limiting the Powers of the National Government
The framers of the Constitution employed several strategies to limit the powers of the national government. Recognizing the potential dangers of a too-powerful central government, they invoked the principle of limited government. To prevent the concentration of power, which James Madison argued was the definition of tyranny, the Constitution separates powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. Moreover, the Constitution includes explicit prohibitions, such as preventing the passage of bills of attainder, ex post facto laws, and limitations on suspending the writ of habeas corpus as found in Article I, Section 9.
This framework ensured a balance of power through a federal republic system, where sovereignty was divided between the national and state governments. The Federalists believed that the enumerated powers and restrictions established by the Constitution were sufficient to protect citizens’ liberties without the need for a separate bill of rights. However, they did incorporate some protections against legislative overreach based on historical abuses. Additionally, the Constitution incorporated six principles, including popular sovereignty and a limited government, to lay the foundation for self-governance and democratic principles.
State employment laws cannot forbid discrimination based on sexual orientation because discrimination based on sexual orientation is not expressly forbidden under federal civil rights law. Group of answer choices
True
False
Answer:
It is FALSE that State employment laws cannot forbid discrimination based on sexual orientation because discrimination based on sexual orientation is not expressly forbidden under federal civil rights law.
Explanation:
Employment law ;is the area of law that governs the employer-employee relationship.This area is made up of both state and federal laws and includes many different subjects with the common goal to protect workers' rights. For employees, these laws work to: Prevent discrimination. Promote health and safety.
Federal Civil Rights Laws; Protect Equal Access.They prohibit discrimination based on race, color, and national origin.
On May 1, Garage Prefabricators, Inc., agrees to sell four portable garages to Hiway Truck Service Center. Five days later, Hiway refuses delivery and cancels the contract. Garage Prefabricators is entitled to
a. resell the garage but not recover any damages from Hiway
b. resell the garage and recover any damages from Hiway
c. force Hiway to accept the garage
d. recover any damages from Hiway but not resell the garage
Answer:B
Explanation:
Under the UCC, Garage Prefabricators is entitled to resell the portable garages and recover any damages due to Hiway Truck Service Center's breach of contract.
Explanation:In a scenario where a buyer, such as Hiway Truck Service Center, refuses delivery and cancels the contract for goods, specifically portable garages, the seller, Garage Prefabricators, Inc., has certain rights under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). Under the UCC, the seller is typically entitled to both resell the goods and recover any damages from the buyer for the breach of contract. This includes any loss resulting from the difference between the original contract price and the market price at the time of the breach, as well as any incidental damages incurred as a result of the buyer's refusal to accept the goods. Therefore, the correct answer to the given situation would be option (b): Garage Prefabricators is entitled to resell the garage and recover any damages from Hiway Truck Service Center.
Learn more about Breach of Contract here:
https://brainly.com/question/25930552
#SPJ2
What two elements must the government demonstrate to punish an individual for criminal behavior?
Which amendments prohibited denial of the right to vote because of race
Answer:
The fifteenth Ammendment prohibited denail of the right to vote because of race
Explanation:
The Fifteenth Ammendments to the Constitution of the United States ('XV') states that governments in the United States cannot prevent a citizen from voting because of their race, color, or prior condition of servitude (slavery). It was ratified on February 3, 1870. Its basic objective was to grant the right to vote to former slaves.
The Voting Rights Act in 1965, made it possible to achieved the full promise of the fifteenth amendment in all states.
Both the federal government and the state governments levy taxes on its citizens. This is an example of which type of power?
Answer:
Concurrent power
Explanation:
Concurrent power is a political power exercised by both Federal and State government at the same time within the same jurisdiction as it relates to their citizens on a subject matter. Examples of Concurrent power enjoyed by both levels of government are in the area of taxation, environmental protection, election regulation, etc.
The full faith and credit clause of the constitution requires
Answer: States within the United States of America to obey the laws and public acts other other states.
Explanation: The full faith and credit clause of the United States of America constitution is contained in Article four, section one. This clause requires the various United States of America to obey and respects the legal judgements,the public acts and records of other states of the Federation. The full faith and credit clause is essential to the survival and sustainance of the unity of the United States of America,as it helps to create unity and ensures that states help and support each other to effectively executive both criminal activities and other strategic Activities.
The full faith and credit clause in the Constitution requires states to recognize and respect public acts, records, and legal proceedings from all other states. Other significant constitutional provisions governing state-to-state and state-to-federal relations include the supremacy clause, privileges and immunities clause, debt validation clause, due process clause, and elastic clause, all of which establish federal supremacy, assure individual liberties, and provide Congress with necessary law-making authority.
Explanation:The full faith and credit clause of the Constitution, specifically Article IV, Section 1, mandates that all states within the United States must respect the public acts, records, and court proceedings of every other state. This mandate implies, for example, that a driver's license or an adoption certificate that's issued in one state remains valid in all other states. This clause was put to test in light of the movement for marriage equality which sparked debates over the recognition of same-sex marriages across states.
While the states retain considerable sovereignty, the supremacy clause in Article VI of the Constitution establishes that in case of any conflict between state and federal law, the federal law triumphs. Furthermore, the privileges and immunities clause of Article IV prohibits states from discriminating against citizens of other states, although there can be some differences in how a state treats its residents and non-residents.
Other significant clauses pertaining to state-to-state and state-to-federal relations include the debt validation clause, due process clauses in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, and the elastic clause in Article I, Section 8. These provisions collectively assert the supremacy of federal law, uphold individuals' liberties, protection, property rights, and travel rights, and provide Congress the authority to enact necessary laws to execute the vested powers.
Learn more about Full Faith and Credit Clause here:https://brainly.com/question/4975837
#SPJ12
In trial for homicide, a conviction cannot be had the body of the victim has been found.
Answer:
If this is a true or false question then the answer is false
there are many ways a trial can still be had; here is one example...
Explanation:
A murder conviction without a body is an instance of a person being convicted of murder despite the absence of the victim's body. Circumstantial and forensic evidence are prominent in such convictions. ... In all cases, unless otherwise noted, the remains of the victims were never recovered.
hope this helps :)
may I get brainliest please?
What are some circumstances under which the Coase theorem fails to apply? Choose all correct options. (A) The two parties are unable to communicate.(B) The externality is small.(C) Property law is clear about everyone’s position.(D) No applicable property law exists.(E) Many individuals are impact
Answer: (A) The two parties are unable to communicate.
(B) The externality is small.
(D) No applicable property law exists.
(E) Many individuals are impact
Explanation:
The coarse theorem suggests that when two parties are able to bargain with each other to reach a common conclusion and reach to an agreement that efficiently addresses the extrernalities. According to the theorem conditions like low transaction cost and well explained property rights are required. If the conditions are favorable, the bargaining parties will reach upto an agreement. But in reality the transaction cost exists and the individuals of the two parties are not able to resolve the problems.
The circumstances like lack of communication between the two parties will affect the agreement and common interest between the two parties, the externalities found to be small, no proper property laws exists this will affect the terms of agreement, no claim can be made and if many parties are involved then the agreement will become difficult.
The Coase theorem, developed by Ronald Coase, may fail under certain conditions, including when the two parties can't communicate, when there is no applicable property law, or when many individuals are impacted by the externality.
Explanation:The Coase theorem, an economic theory, proposed by Ronald Coase, posits that in conditions of complete property rights and zero transaction costs, two parties can efficiently negotiate optimal outcomes related to an externality. However, it may fail under certain circumstances. The options provided in the question, which represent these circumstances, are :
(A) The two parties are unable to communicate: The Coase theorem assumes that parties can negotiate, which requires effective communication. If communication is not possible, the theorem fails. (D) No applicable property law exists: The theorem takes for granted the existence of clearly defined property rights. Without such rights, efficient bargaining cannot occur. (E) Many individuals are impacted: The Coase theorem works best in bilateral negotiations. When multiple parties are involved or affected, transaction costs rise, leading to inefficiencies and making the theorem irrelevant. Learn more about Coase theorem here:
https://brainly.com/question/34414625
#SPJ3
_______ is a Group of people who decide a case after hearing the evidence
Answer:
A jury is a Group of people who decide a case after hearing the evidence
_____ describes a situation wherein an individual takes on responsibility for and a legal duty to a stranger in peril because he or she chose to assist.
Answer:
assumption of duty
Explanation:
Assumption of duty describes a situation wherein an individual takes on responsibility for and a legal duty to a stranger in peril because he or she chose to assist. It occur when an individual who has been delegated a duty promises to perform to the third party and the promise is supported by its consideration or its equivalent.
What was the last state to ratify the articles of confederation
Answer:Maryland
Explanation:
They were the last, who ratified them on March 1st, 1781.
A plaintiff sues in negligence but has no direct proof that the defendant behaved unreasonably. What is most likely to help the plaintiff?
Answer:
Res ipsa loquitur
Explanation:
Res Ipsa Loquitur, which loosely means that the facts speak for themselves, is a rule of proof that enables injured parties to avoid the typical proof of negligence in their claim to recuperate damages from the responsible parties. The general law initially stated that the accident has to satisfy the essential basics of negligence: duty, causation, breach of duty, and injury.
Instead of compiling an intricate case indicating that the defendant commits a breach in duty of care that has proximately caused damages or injury, the plaintiff only needs to show that:
• The petitioner suffered damages or incurred injuries under conditions that normally does not occur without negligence.
• The defendant was completely in control of the place where the accident occured or the thing that caused it to happen (the instrumentality, in legalese).
• The plaintiff’s own careless actions does not in any way influence the accident.
According to research, what characteristic is most frequently shared by firms that receive high rankings for corporate social responsibility? encouraging employees to participate in civic activities requiring managers to understand ethics laws promoting integrity through ethics training linking compensation to ethical behaviors
Answer:
Promoting integrity through ethics training.Explanation:
Ethics training means training the employees to identify and deal with various types of ethical problems that they face in everyday actions and choices. It is the basis of the long term success.
It allows the employees to maintain productivity and quality, and also allows the organisations to comply with the regulations and the laws.
Above all it ensures proper and good relationships with the vendors and customers. Ethics training can also help to teach employees about integrity.
Final answer:
Firms with high rankings in corporate social responsibility commonly share the trait of promoting integrity through comprehensive ethics training.
Explanation:
The characteristic most frequently shared by firms that receive high rankings for corporate social responsibility is the promotion of integrity through ethics training. This approach underlines the importance of establishing a strong ethical foundation within the company, fostering a culture of accountability and ethical decision-making.
Fostering integrity through continuous ethics training helps to align the values of the company with its actions, leading to more reliable and trustworthy practices both internally and in the community.
Australian law may require people to vote, but mandatory voting laws are unlikely to mean that each vote cast in an election __________________________________.
Options:
Will matter less than it does in a free society
Is worth the loss of freedom not to vote
Will be an informed or thoughtful vote
Was cast by voters who don't care who wins
Answer:Will be an informed or thoughtful vote.
Explanation:Voting is the process through which people in a democratic setting or Government choose who will govern them. In certain countries or society there are certain laws governing voting in some countries it is mandatory while in other countries it is seen as a Franchise where you can wish to participate or not.
mandatory voting laws are unlikely to mean that each vote cast in an election will be an informed or thoughtful vote.
Answer:
Will be an informed or thoughtful vote
Explanation:
Mandatory voting is an effect of law which requires eligible citizens to register and vote and imposes penalties on those who fail to do so.
Since 1924, Australian citizens over the age of 18 have been required to vote in federal elections, by-elections and referendums, and since 1984, voting became compulsory for Indigenous Australians. Since voting has been made compulsory for eligible Australian citizens, an average turnout of 90% has always been recorded in any voting exercise. Citizens that fail to participate in the general elections are Fined ranging from 20 Australian dollars for missing a federal election, up to 79 Australian dollars for skipping a state poll.
As free citizens, people should be allowed to decide whether or not to participate in a voting exercise or not. Forcing apathetic or uneducated citizens to vote steers the nation’s political destiny towards populism. An apathetic voter may cast a blank or marred ballot as a protest. Others may vote for a candidate without considering what benefits the decision will have on the nation because they are just being compelled to vote and not of their own volition.
Educating voters on the benefits of voting is a better way of enhancing mass voting than mere compulsion. Sensitization will allow citizens to see the need to vote and make a thoughtful decision on who to vote for.
Property rights have been determined to be a major factor that helps countries sustain economic growth. Governments can change laws and policies in order to give individuals and firms more freedom. By doing​ so
Answer:
the government gives entrepreneurs the right to purchase capital i.e.,land which can be used to sustain economic growth.Explanation:
If governments can relax property rights and change the laws and policies of property rights in order to give individuals and firms more freedom, it will have a great impact in the economic growth of the country.
This is because if individuals or firms can purchase capital such as land, it will induce the entrepreneurs to take more risks to create new products, ideas, and more technology. Land can be used as an asset to mortgage or to avail loans to enhance productivity of the firms.
Property and contractual rights are essential for economic growth, serving as the foundation for secure transactions and business activities. Governments can foster a conducive legal environment for these rights, thereby enabling economic activities and investments. Additionally, investments in human capital, infrastructure, and innovation further stimulate economic growth.
Property rights and contractual rights are fundamental to economic growth. These are the rights allowing individuals and firms to own and use property as they see fit, including the ability to enter into contracts with others concerning the use of their property. Having a legal environment that upholds these rights enables societal trust in the security of transactions, which is crucial for doing business and, consequently, stimulates economic activities and growth. Governments can enhance economic growth by modifying laws and policies to ensure that property rights are clear, public, fair, enforced, and equally applicable to all members of society.
For economies to grow, output and incomes must increase, which requires a setting where individuals feel confident to invest, innovate, and engage in commerce. This confidence stems from the assurance that their property and contractual rights are protected by law. Without such a legal framework, the risk of non-payment and the inability to enforce agreements would deter people from doing business, thereby slowing down economic growth