I will make the first person who answers this brainliest!!!

Scenario 2
State law recognizes that the owner of a vehicle is the person or company whose name appears on the title, or legal and official ownership document. The state also recognizes payment agreements that people and businesses make through official, legal means.
A young woman says her neighbor agreed to purchase her old car. She agreed to accept payments from him on a monthly basis until he paid off the car and trusted that he would honor this plan. She signed ownership over to him on the title, which he also signed. She says that he has not made any payments and still has possession of the car.
The neighbor says he understood the car to be a gift and has no obligation to make payments. He did not sign an official agreement to make payments. He says that she gave him the car in exchange for his electric scooter, which is new and gets great gas mileage. The neighbor maintains she just wants the car back now that he fixed it and it looks better.
Is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? How do you know? ____________________________________________________________________________
Is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or combination? How do you know? ____________________________________________________________________________
Determine the purpose of the law related to the scenario. Is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? Explain your response and thoughts on what could happen if the law did not exist. Use details from the scenario to support your answer. _____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
Do you think the young woman has a valid argument that her neighbor owes her payment for the car? In other words, should government make an exception to the law about the owner being the person whose name is on the title? Use details from the scenario to support your answer. ____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________

Is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? How do you know? It's a civil law because it's a misunderstanding between two civilians. 

Is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or combination? How do you know?  I believe it might be a combination of statue and regulation law because there's some documentation and exchange item.  

Determine the purpose of the law related to the scenario. Is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? It is to protect the people's rights, not safety. " She says that he has not made any payments and still has possession of the car." The disagreement is over a vehicle which is just property. 


Do you think the young woman has a valid argument that her neighbor owes her payment for the car? In other words, should government make an exception to the law about the owner being the person whose name is on the title? I think she does not have a valid argument. " She signed ownership over to him on the title, which he also signed. She says that he has not made any payments and still has possession of the car." If she wants to sell her car, she should have done it the proper way, otherwise she should be prepared to meet the consequences. 

The legal dispute over a car between a young woman and her neighbor falls under civil law, which aims to protect individuals' property rights. The woman's claim is complicated by the lack of a written payment agreement, and the title's presence in the neighbor's name usually indicates ownership in the eyes of the law.

Civil law deals with the rights and duties of individuals among themselves. In this case, the source of law is likely a statute, as the state recognizes the owner of a vehicle through the title, an official document. Without the law in place, individuals would risk losing their property without legal recourse, and it might lead to an increase in fraudulent activities. Here, the purpose of law is to protect people's property rights and provide a mechanism for resolving disputes like the one between the young woman and her neighbor.

The young woman could argue that despite the title being in her neighbor's name, there was a verbal contract relating to the payment plan. However, verbal agreements can be difficult to enforce, especially if not witnessed or recorded. The absence of an official, written and signed payment agreement makes this case more challenging. Thus, government intervention by making an exception to the law based on verbal agreement claims could set a complicated precedent. Therefore, usually the person whose name appears on the title is recognized as the owner, as possession and ownership rights are well-established to avoid ambiguity and conflict.

Why did kings of France, England, and Spain urge exploration and settlement of the New World?

Compare and contrast

compare and contrast the exploration made by Lewis and Clark with Pike’s, and tell why the Lewis and Clark journey was considered more valuable. Include the material each exploration team brought back, the territory covered, the people they met, and the amount of information each contributed.
please be specific
thank you!