The correct answer is social-cognitive
A basic principle of social cognitive theory is that a person's functioning is based on three pathways: reciprocal personal interaction, behavioral and environmental factors and what he believes about himself and experiences about others.
Cognitive social theory postulates that an individual can plan, direct and self-regulate his own learning and behavioral outcomes. She says that people learn by watching others, but they don't necessarily evidence learning until they are personally motivated to do so.
Air can be heated in many different ways. At night, if air moves up one side of a mountain range such as the Sierra Nevada, raining or snowing on the way, and then down the other side, the air is hotter after moving over than it was before. What is the main reason, as discussed in the class materials?
Answer: Condensation of water vapor to form clouds and rain releases heat that was stored when the water evaporated.
Explanation: Condensation mostly occurs in the atmosphere when warm air rises, cools and looses its capacity to hold water vapor. The gaseous water molecules release energy into the cooler air around them and move closer together. The spaces between the molecules decrease until they are close enough to change form from a gas to a liquid. Therefore, forming the cloud and rain would release the heat that was stored when the water evaporated.
Prior to beginning any study, Professor Cleutter’s research team carefully explains the research to potential participants, answers questions, and helps them to determine if the study is right for them. Professor Cleutter and his team are showing respect for participants' ______.
Answer:
autonomy
Explanation:
Autonomy refers to one's(participants) freedom to decide what to do in a research . Even when a participant may have signed the informed consent form, they must be made aware and it must be possible and "free" for them to still be able to withdraw from the research study at any time, without giving a reason. Professor Cleutter demonstrates from the above the need to properly inform the participants about the research and allow them make informed decisions.
Answer:
Autonomy
Explanation:
Autonomy is the right a group, an individual or a country to be independent. It is their right to free decision making. In research, every participant has the right to opt-in or opt-out of the research.
Professor Cleutter’s research team out of respect for the participants' autonomy gives details of the study. This act will help identify who is fit for the research. It will also save Professor Cleutter’s research team the stress of having to lose a participant in the middle of a research work
Christen who just turned eighteen is out with several friends. They decide to see a movie, but it is sold out. Christen hid in the back of the theatre and yelled "Fire" as loudly as she could. Everyone ran out of the theatre, and a number got in their vehicles and left. Christen and her friends thought that seeing the movie was now possible. Unfortunately, a theatre employee saw Christen yelling, called the police, and she was arrested. Christen told the police officers that she was only exercising her free speech rights. She also told the police that the theatre employee lied and that she personally saw him stealing popcorn. The theatre employee told Christen that he was going to sue for defamation, and she told him that she would win based on her right to free speech. Discuss whether Christen is right on one or both counts and why.
Answer:
Christen is wrong in both counts.
Explanation:
Freedom of speech or freedom of expression is the individual or collective right to enunciate, utter and develop individual or community ideas, opinions and arguments. It is expected that anyone can express their ideas free from retaliation, censorship, or legal action. It is recognised as a Universal Human Right, and most countries in the world include it as part of its constitution.
However, freedom of speech has some limitations, which are imposed aiming to restrain people to harm other individuals or communities. For instance, when someone intentionally lies to commit fraud. These limitations vary from country to country, for instance, Germany forbids speech that denies the Holocaust, but Spain does not. Yet, there are some common limitations to free speech across most UN Member States. These are related to incitement to terrorism or riot, fraud, unauthorised usage of copyrighted material, invitation or incitation to commit a crime, defamation and in many cases obscenity.
Christen yelled "Fire" in an attempt to prompt the theatre audience to vacate. This was a lie, since there was not a fire in the facilities. This can be taken as a fraud, since she tricked the patrons to abandon the premises.
When she was caught, she intended to defame the theatre employee.
In both occasions, she was not protected by freedom of speech principle.
Final answer:
Christen's claim of exercising her free speech rights is incorrect because falsely shouting 'Fire' in a crowded space is not protected under the First Amendment due to the clear and present danger it poses.
Explanation:
Christen is not correct in asserting that her actions are protected under free speech rights for two reasons.
First, the act of falsely yelling "Fire" in a crowded theatre does not constitute protected speech because it presents a clear and present danger to public order, potentially leading to panic and harm, as established by the Supreme Court's longstanding precedent.
Secondly, Christen's accusation against the theatre employee could constitute defamation if it is proven to be false and made with malice.
According to legal precedents, such as Schenck v. United States (1919), shouting that there is a fire when there is none is a classic example where free speech is limited due to the potential immediate threat to safety.
As for defamation, Christen's false accusation about the employee stealing popcorn, if proven untrue and damaging to the employee's reputation, could lead to a successful defamation suit, as indicated by the legal standards for libel and slander.
Compare and contrast communism and fascism. Select one example for each to examine the origins of the governments, their accomplishments, and their failures. What accounts for the fact that the masses mobilized to support these movements? Elaborate.
Answer:
communism is a system based around a theory of economic equality and advocates for a classless society, WHILE, fascism is a nationalistic, top-down system with rigid class roles that is ruled by an all-powerful dictator. Both communism and fascism originated in Europe and gained popularity in the early to mid 20th century.
Fascist governments are different from communist ones in that fascists, in theory, support the right of labor representatives and corporate representatives (CEOs, company presidents, etc.) to negotiate - through a system called corporatism.
Explanation: The most disturbing development of the interwar era was the emergence of totalitarian communist and fascist governments.1 Italian dictator Benito Mussolini coined the word “totalitarian” to express the state’s role of personifying the “immanent spirit of the nation,” but the word has come to mean the state’s total control of politics, economics, and society. In this sense, totalitarianism has been more nearly a “communist” than a “fascist” phenomenon.
A guy has two girlfriends: in the East and the West. He works near 5 Points Marta station and finishes his job at a random time of the day. Rather than deciding to which of two girls take the train - he leaves the choice to a chance: he takes the train (East or West) whichever comes first. The west train comes every 10 min and the East train comes every 10 min throughout the day. Nevertheless, after half a year he finds out that he is coming to east girl several time more frequently than to the West girl.Why?
The guy visits the east more frequently because, due to factors like the timing patterns of the trains and his work schedule, the east-bound train often arrived next more frequently during the instances when he made it to the station.
Explanation:The situation described in the question pertains to the concept of probability and frequency in mathematics. Even though both east and west trains have the same frequency (i.e., both arrive every 10 minutes), the guy ends up visiting the east more. This can be explained using a principle called conditional probability.
Assuming the guy arrives at the station at a random time and he takes the first train that arrives, irrespective of its direction. So the chance that he takes a specific train depends not only on the frequency of that train but also on when he gets to the station. The chances are equal if he gets to the station exactly when both trains are there, else the odds favor the train that is due to arrive next.
Therefore, it could be that the east train was simply due to arrive next more frequently during the instances when the guy made it to the station. This could occur due to numerous factors, such as timing patterns of the trains and the guy's work schedule etc. If these factors somehow align in such a way that the east train tends to arrive next after the guy's work ends, then he would end up on the east train (and thus, end up visiting the east ) more frequently.
Learn more about Probability and Frequency here:https://brainly.com/question/1452877
#SPJ12
The CASEL Model Site evaluation of SEL programs examined their level of quality over five years. Programs that did continue to provide high-quality services had three characteristics. Which characteristic below is one of those three?
a. training and skill development among teachers
b. support from school administration and parents
c. extensive funding for the program
d. both ‘a’ and ‘b’
The correct answer is letter A
Explanation: CASEL programs examined high-quality, school-based prevention programs that sustain the level of quality for five years now.
CASEL model is a type of educational model, where teachers are trained so that they are very competent in what they do and thus become good teachers with a preparation focused on a phenomenal type of education.
Suppose that a study of children who were 9 to 14-years-old found that the larger a shoe size that a child has, the higher the score they got on a mathematical skills test. One interpretation might be that increased shoe size causes improved quantification skills. What might be a confounding variable in this relationship? Please give your answer and explain in no more than three sentences.
Answer:Some individuals may be natural good at maths or may be just smart kids who are good with mathematics
Explanation:Some students may be intelligent or good at maths which means the shoe size will not be the cause of their quantification skills.
A confounding variable refers to another variable that you may have not take notice of but which is very likely to act on the variable you are trying to measure and make that change you are looking for , its an extra variable. It can mess up your experiment and give you result that are not caused by what your projected. They can assume a correlation that doesn't exist and insert bias in your study. For this reason you have to know these variable before you start your research or study in order to avoid them.
The correct answer is the skills of the children in math.
In statistics, a confounding variable also known as a confounding factor, a confusing variable or confounding factor is a strange variable that is positively or negatively associated with both the explanatory variable and the response variable. We need to control these factors to avoid incorrect beliefs that the response variable is associated with the explanatory variable.
Confusion is a major threat to the validity of inferences made about statistical associations. In the case of a confounding variable, the association observed with the response variable should be attributed to the confounding factor, instead of the explanatory variable. In science, we test for confounding factors including these third, or fourth, or fifth, or sixth variables, in statistical models to explain the association of interest.
22. Two closed, pyramid-shaped beakers containing clearly identical amounts of a liquid are judged by a child to hold different amounts after one of the beakers is inverted. The child apparently lacks a sense of what child development milestone?
Answer:
b. Concept of conservation
Explanation:
The concept of conservation is related to logical ability. This is the ability to understand the logical thinking that a certain quantity is the same despite the size has been changed. It helps a person to understand the shape and size, and apparent size.
The concept of conservation was given by Jean Piaget. The conservation is not found in the pre-operational stage of development in children. Conservation is a property of children in which children developed logical thinking about the invariant size, shape of an object despite it is not resent in front of a child.
Thus in the above statement, the child lacks the sense of what child development milestone.
Don is Equipment Repair Company’s chief executive officer. On Equipment Repair’s behalf, Don solicits business, hires and fires workers, and handles finances. With respect to Equipment Repair, Don is most likely
Answer: An employee.
Explanation: An employee is an individual who was hired by an employer to do a specific job. Employee is hired for a specific job or to provide labor and who works in the service of someone else (the employer).
When a given bond's price increases, we know that the interest rate on this bond: Select one: a. remains unchanged. b. must increase. c. must decrease. d. could increase, decrease, or remain unchanged.
Answer:
c. must decrease.
Explanation:
Bond and interest rates are inversely proportional. This simply means that, when the price of bond rises, the interest rates falls, and when the price of bond falls, the interest rates rises.
For example:
Hypothetically, you bought a bond at a price of $100 with an annual fixed interest rates of 4% for 4years which will be $4 per year. After a year, the same amount of bonds in the market, has a 5% annual increase. However, you don't want to wait till maturity, and you intend to sell your bond.
Your bond compared to other bonds in the market goes thus:
Your bond at $100 with interest rates of $4 per year for the next three years will equal to $12 of interest at maturity stage.
While others bonds of the same price with $5 interest rate annually will equal $15 of interest at maturity stage.
Therefore, no reasonable buyer will buy your bond at such interest rates. So to find a buyer, your bond price will have to be reduced to $97 at $4 annual interest rates.
Therefore, for the buyer, he will make ($4 x 3) which is for three years interest and it will be equal to $12, then plus additional $3 when the bond matures, which now equals $15, will then equates to the same amount of interest yield compared to other bonds of $100 at 5% annual interest rate for 3 years.
Answer: The most correct option is option c. The interest rate must decrease.
Explanation:. Bond price is a form of loan price, which is the present value of a future value. These are given to individuals or group by the governments or corporations when they want to increase money.
When you buy a bond, it means that you gave a loan to the person that sold the bond to you, and the face value of this loan will be paid in a specific time, with an interest.
When the bond price increase, it means that the yield of the bond has also increased, that means people are now buying the bond more, the interest of such bond will drop, to reduce the money been circulated. These bond price is used to control the flow of money in the economy.
Lalita, age four, has tried unsuccessfully to be the director of house play on several occasions. Ms. Kurzhals usually dismissed children to free choice activities for the story time by name. She has noticed Lalitas attempts and is considering what might be effective in supporting her. What do you think she should try first?
a. Change the materials that are available for free play.
b. Explain the importance of taking turns to the children during the story time.
c. Dismiss Lalita ahead of her usual playmates for a few days so that she can arrive at the pretend play area first.
d. Direct the players to allow Lalita to determine the narrative of the play from outside the play frame.
Answer:
(C) Dismiss Lalita ahead of her usual playmates for a few days so that she can arrive at the pretend play area first.
EXPLANATION:
It is ideal to dismiss Lalita ahead of her regular playmates for a couple of days, so she can get to the imaginary play area first. This would be effective in supporting Lalita become the director of the play house through constant practice within those days.
To assist Lalita in her attempts to direct house play, Ms. Kurzhals should explain the importance of taking turns to all children, fostering an empathetic and inclusive environment that supports Lalita and the entire class socially.
Explanation:To support Lalita in becoming the director of house play effectively, Ms. Kurzhals should consider option (b) Explain the importance of taking turns to the children during story time. This approach fosters a classroom environment where empathy, understanding of others' perspectives, and social skills like turn-taking are emphasized. These are crucial aspects of a child's social development and can help children understand why Lalita, or any child, should be given the chance to lead play activities.
By discussing the concept of taking turns, Ms. Kurzhals can help all children, including Lalita, feel more included and valued, thus supporting Lalita's attempts in a way that benefits the entire class. This method also aligns with the developmental understanding that children around the age of four are beginning to grasp the idea that different people can have different viewpoints. This foundational skill in social cognition is essential for effective cooperative play and leadership in group settings.
you decide to forgo partying for two hours to study for an upcoming economics exam. In your first semster's Princples of Economics class, you learn that the enjoyment you would have recieved from partying is an exampleof_____________________
Answer: Oppurtunity cost
Explanation: Oppurtunity cost refers to the value of what you have to give up in order to choose something else. Opportunity cost requires sacrifices. If there is no sacrifice involved in a decision, there will be no opportunity cost.
The full participant may be a genuine participant in what he or she is studying or at least pretend to be a genuine participant. In any event, if a researcher is acting as a full participant, he/she lets people see him/her only as a___________________________, not as a researcher.
Answer: Participant
Explanation:
Full participant or complete participant is the person who is completely attached researcher of the experiment or study.This researcher is immersed in experiment completely such that participants aren't aware that research is being conducted on them while interacting and observing with researcher .
According to the question,if any researcher is acting as complete participants then other participants involved in the study do not have hint about researcher. They don't behave as researcher during study with participants and thus, others see researcher as participant.
The correct answer is participant
Explanation: In this case the full participant cannot let people discover that it is the full participant and this makes them act as if they were a normal research participant, which is a difficult job because you must be very careful so that the other participants do not realize that one who looks like a normal participant is actually not.
In the ethical yardstick of ________, decisions are made solely on the basis of their outcomes, ideally to provide the greatest good for the greatest number.
Answer:
utilitarianism
Explanation:
By using utilitarianism approach, person differentiate between right and wrong decision on basis of their consequences. In utilitarianism approach person consider right as right when its outcomes not only maximize his happiness and well-being but also make other people not affected.
Which of the following is a difference between structured interviews and unstructured interviews? a. Unlike structured interviews, unstructured interviews involve trained interviewers. b. Unlike structured interviews, unstructured interviews involve asking the same questions for all candidates. c. Unlike structured interviews, unstructured interviews have acceptable reliability and validity. d. Unlike structured interviews, unstructured interviews have no established scoring key.
Answer:
d. Unlike structured interviews, unstructured interviews have no established scoring key.
Explanation:
Structured Interviews have a pre - decided uniform set of questions to be asked by all the interviewees and all of them marked on that standardised score key.
Unstructured Interviews don't have a pre decided uniform set of questions , is more like a detailed conversation between interviewer & interviewee. And interviewees are marked on over all personality aspects of interviewee.
So, Unlike structured interviews, unstructured interviews have no established scoring key.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": Unlike structured interviews, unstructured interviews have no established scoring key.
Explanation:
Structured interviews are based on a set of fixed questions that are asked in the same order to different interviewees. Those questions are closed because a fixed answer is expected. Structured interviews are unflexible having set score interviewees can get based on their answers.
Unstructured interviews require an interviewer to make questions that could arise as part of the interaction with the interviewee. The questions are open and allow interviewers to collect details on the topics being treated. These interviews are flexible but they do not have an established rating.
Which of the following is NOT a symptom of groupthink? Illusions of invulnerability Pressure for conformity Careful evaluation of alternatives Self-censorship
Answer:
Careful evaluation of alternatives
Explanation:
Groupthink is a phenomenon when people get together to think with one mind setting aside their differences and individual goals just to achieve a group goal.
The symptom of groupthink that is NOT listed is: Careful evaluation of alternatives.
What is groupthinkGroupthink is when people in a group or team all want to agree and get along, so they stop thinking carefully and making good decisions. This often leads to making wrong or illogical decisions. Signs of groupthink can include:Illusions
Illusions of invulnerability happen when a group of people strongly believe they are always right and that nothing bad can happen to them. This makes them overly confident and they don't consider potential dangers or negative results.
Read more about groupthink here:
https://brainly.com/question/10206116
#SPJ6
You are assigned a two-student project. Assume that you and your partner are both interested in maximizing your grade, but you are both very busy and get more happiness if you can get a good grade with less work.
Answer:.Your dominant strategy is you both work less hard
Explanation:You both want a good grade with less work so this means you don't have to strain yourselves , you got to choose a strategy that will work for both of you without putting extreme effort , this would be different than when you both wanted to maximize your grade because that would call you both to work hard.
how is a civic virtue different from other kinds of virtue?
A. the behavior is different
B. people with civic virtue are morally superior
C. the goal is to promote democracy
D. the aim is to promote moral goodness
Answer:
C. the goal is to promote democracy
Explanation:
Civic virtue is different from other kinds of virtue because the goal is to promote democracy, it has to do with the willingness to do ones part in supporting the effort of the government and public good and it is important for the success/effective functioning of a government and society.
Describe in detail the differences between the way experts and nonexperts go about solving problems. In your answer, highlight the advantages and disadvantages to being an expert in a field.
Answer:
Explanation:
To share a brief understanding of experts, who is an expert, an expert is considered, someone who has enough experience to carry put a particular task, he or she understands the possible scenarios and problems that might likely affect a system. While a non expert is someone, not that he doesn't understand the system, he might but not in details ,not enough experience unlike am expert.
So from the above analogy between experts and non experts ,it can be deduced that the method and approach to work from an expert will be more detailed because the possible scenarios of the task, he very much understands it buh a non expert, thou he might understand the task , but the approach to the system might be difference. An expert will potentially go straight to the point of the task, and even before starting the task already has a full knowledge of the problem compared to am non expert that might nor have a general knowledge of the task buh approaching the task with just confidence of previous works related to such task. I believe from the few points I have been able to point out the differences between an expert and non expert.
Being an expert in a field is a good thing in order to solve problem.
The differences between the way experts and nonexperts go about solving problems is that expert have knowledge of ways and methods solving problem while on the other hand, nonexpert have no knowledge about solving problem.
Advantages of being an expert in a field is that expert know how to use different tools and methods for solving problem while on the other hand, disadvantages of being an expert in a field is that expert is not able to learn or accept new problems or situations so we can conclude that being an expert in a field is a good thing in order to solve problem.
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/15016613
Basaltic magma has the lowest viscosity, so more of it reaches the surface; the more viscous rhyolitic magmas are so sluggish that they tend to be trapped deep below the surface where they cool, solidify, and grow into the larger mineral crystals of plutonic rocks.a. True.b. False.
Answer:True
Explanation:
Magma are molten materials which are found beneath the earth, when molten magma gets frozen they form Igneous rocks.
Basaltic magma
is one of the three types of magma,it is known to be high in iron, magnesium, and calcium contents but it has a low in potassium and sodium content, they have the lowest viscosity.
Rhyolitic magma are of the three types of magma, they formed as a result of the differentiation of Basaltic magma accompanied by the assimilation of materials which contains silicon, THEY ARE KNOWN TO BE SLUGGISH AND MORE VISCOUS WHEN COMPARED TO BASALTIC MAGMA.
A set of rules are used for performing the verification and validation walkthrough of behavioral model. One of the rules is: all entries in a CRUDE matrix imply _____________ being sent from an actor or object to another actor or object
Answer:
message
Explanation:
Derive the relationship between evolutionary substitution rate (at the population level) and mutation rate of individuals when genetic drift and mutation are the only mechanism of evolution operating. Then comment on how population size affects the generation and maintenance of genetic diversity under this model of drift/mutation balance
Answer&Explanation:
Mutation refers to a chance in an organism's DNA, this means a change in hereditary traits of that's organism.
This change in DNA will change how an organism behaves,looks like and it's physiology. This mean an overall life of that organism changes , this makes mutation a huge crucial aspect of evolution, because it is the major aspect that result to genetic variation and changes in organisms.
how population size affects the generation and maintenance of genetic diversity under this model of drift/mutation balance?
Genetic drift reduces genetic variation in a population. This is because genetic drift causes changes in how frequent certain alleles are which occurs just randomly , this is very likely to have a major affect in a small population but not much in a large population.
Gene mutations are sudden changes that occur in genes, that is, it is the process by which a gene undergoes a structural change. Mutations are distinguished from aberrations in that they are changes at the point level, involving the elimination or replacement of one or a few nucleotides in the DNA strand.
The addition or subtraction of bases alters the genetic code, defined by the sequence of three adjacent bases in the mRNA, and consequently it can change the type of amino acid included in the protein chain and, ultimately, it can change the phenotypic expression.
The replacement of a purine (adenine and guanine) with another purine, or a pyrimidine (cytosine and thymine) with another pyrimidine is called a transition. The replacement of a purine with a pyrimidine, or vice versa, is called transversion.
The genetic derivative is one of the basic mechanisms of evolution, associated with natural selection, activated and mutated. This mechanism, especially important in small threats, can be defined as a change in allele frequencies that occurs in a totally random manner. Although it also uses the genetic makeup of a population, it can differentiate natural selection by not producing adaptations
In the case of natural selection, the gene that passes on to the next generation is the one that provided a better adaptation to the environment. In genetic drift, the gene that passed on to the next generation was the one that was most “lucky”.
"The higher divorce rate of couples who previously cohabited compared to those who did not can be explained by different attitudes toward marriage and divorce held by individuals in these two groups." This explanation illustrates:____________.
Answer:
Selection effect
Explanation:
The selection effect or the selection biased is the procedure of distortion in the statistical analysis. collecting in the data from the sample population. It is a threat from out of the four for validity. It shows the result of the test variables. It is a type of conversion rate. It is like collecting the data from the unrepresentative population.
Thus here the higher diverse report of the divorce of the couples. This is the explanation of the selection bias.
Couples who cohabited before marriage have a higher divorce rate due to different attitudes and less commitment to the idea of marriage compared to those who never cohabited. Cohabitation patterns can undermine marital stability, leading to higher divorce rates among these couples. Social acceptance of ending unfulfilling relationships also contributes to higher divorce rates.
Explanation:The explanation that the higher divorce rate of couples who cohabited before marriage compared to those who did not can be linked to different attitudes toward marriage and divorce illustrates the complex interplay of personal values and societal trends. Cohabitation has become more common in the US, and it has been studied extensively for its impacts on subsequent marriages. Studies, such as those by Lawrence Ganong and Marilyn Coleman, have shown that cohabitors may develop relationship patterns that later undermine marital duration, leading to a higher likelihood of divorce for these couples compared to those who never cohabited.
Additionally, cohabiters might have lower levels of commitment to the idea of marriage and thereby show a greater willingness to divorce if they become unhappy in their marriage. This is contrasted with individuals who see cohabitation as a prelude to marriage with the intent to establish a lasting relationship. Factors like financial readiness, expectations of relationship satisfaction, and the perceived stability also play roles in how relationships evolve post-cohabitation.
Significant research indicates that children from cohabiting unions face different challenges as compared to those from married unions, potentially causing lower well-being in various life aspects. With the American emphasis on romantic love and individualism, higher rates of marriage and divorce are observed, as people seek fulfilling intimate relationships while also having the societal acceptance to end those that are unfulfilling.
"If you were to design a political system for a representative democracy that would produce a multi-party system with coalition governments, what form of electoral process would you choose?"
Answer:
Proportional representation
Explanation:
If I wanted to design a political system for a representative democracy that would result in a multi-party system with coalition governments, I would personally go for a system of proportional representation. Proportional representation is a system in which divisions in the electorate are accurately reflected proportionately in the elected body. Because of this, smaller parties are more likely to be able to place elected officials in power. Moreover, this system tends to have a great plurality of ideologies represented in government.
Norepinephrine acts on the heart by ________. A) decreasing heart contractility B) causing a decrease in stroke volume C) blocking the action of calcium D) causing threshold to be reached more quickly
Answer: option d
Explanation:they are also normally called noradrenaline.
They do help by constant regulating of the blood pressure and to increase the sugar (glucose) level content in the blood. It help majorly to lift up (increase) the rate as well as the force of the contraction of the heart and also in do lead to an increase in muscle contraction due to the fact that they are push out(realeased) from the sympathetic nerve fibre ends.
Norepinephrine acts on the heart by causing the threshold to be reached more quickly. Thus, option D is correct.
Vasoconstriction, which is a narrowing of the blood vessels, is encouraged by norepinephrine. Consequently, blood pressure rises as a result. Norepinephrine activates alpha-adrenoreceptors in the blood vessel cells, much like epinephrine does. Blood sugar levels and heart rate both rise as a result.
Chemical messengers epinephrine and norepinephrine are both. Both neurotransmitters and hormones are produced by them. Epinephrine, norepinephrine, and other hormones produced by the endocrine and reproductive systems circulate in the circulation as hormones. They instruct tissues and organs to function in various ways.
The role of neurotransmitters is comparable. They only exist in neuron cells, though, and move across synapses, which are the points where two nerve fibers converge. Neurotransmitters are created by nerve cells in response to electrical impulses.
Therefore, option D is the ideal selection.
Learn more about norepinephrine here:
https://brainly.com/question/32498776
#SPJ6
You have learned that earnings functions are one of the most investigated relationships in economics. These typically relate the logarithm of earnings to a series of explanatory variables such as education, work experience, gender, race, etc. Why do you think that researchers have preferred a log-linear specification over a linear specification?
Researchers prefer the log-linear specification because economic gains are not naturally distributed.
We can arrive at this answer because:
Within the economy, earnings are a dependent variable in relation to factors such as education, professional experiences, race, and other elements that can be considered independent variables.The distribution of earnings within an economic system is not done naturally.This promotes an increase in the error variation, which can harm an analysis with a linear method.In this case, the use of log-linear specification can cause a more stabilized distribution that is closer to reality, promoting more precise and correct results.
More information:
https://brainly.com/question/967776?referrer=searchResults
Many discussions of crime suggest that smart defendants are able to beat charges by pleading insanity, slanting their testimony at the urging of defense counsel, and exploiting legal loopholes such as the exclusionary rule. Given the profile of the typical criminal defendant, how realistic are these assumptions?
While perceptions suggest that smart defendants can easily evade charges through the insanity defense and legal strategies, these are not realistic portrayals of the average criminal defendant's situation. The insanity defense is infrequently used and seldom successful, and most defendants resort to plea bargaining due to limited resources and the potential for heavier sentences at trial.
Discussions about smart defendants beating charges often revolve around the insanity defense and perceived legal loopholes, but the reality within the criminal justice system is quite different. First, the insanity defense is narrowly defined and hard to prove, with the onus on the defendant to rebut the presumption of sanity, and it is rarely successful. In addition, the profile of a typical criminal defendant does not match the well-resourced individual capable of manipulating the system; many struggle with mental illness, adequate representation, and the financial means to mount such defenses.
Plea bargaining is a much more common occurrence in the criminal justice system due to the enormous incentives it provides for both the prosecution and the defense. Wealth plays a considerable role, where affluent defendants may have the means to afford high-powered attorneys and mount substantial defenses, potentially including the insanity defense. However, this is not the typical scenario, as the vast majority of criminal defendants do not have such resources and, instead, often rely on plea bargains to avoid harsher sentences associated with trials.
Another critical aspect is the consequences of going to trial. Defendants who exercise their right to a trial face harsher sentences compared to those who accept plea deals. Less than 3 percent of felony cases actually go to trial, which means the majority of defendants accept plea bargains, often due to coercion or the inability to mount an effective defense. This system disproportionately affects those without the means to challenge or navigate the system effectively.
The three-year-old class at Ms. Cherry's Preschool is getting ready to take a field trip to the local supermarket. While the two teachers prepare the van, what is the best strategy for the student teacher to take while supervising the children?
a. Stand the children in line, going over the safety rules and regulations for field trips.
b. Have the children sit in circle time and report what they did over the weekend.
c. Put on a puppet show for the children.
d. Allow the children to play in the classroom, while keeping a watchful eye, ready to intervene as necessary.
Answer: Stand the children in line, going over the safety rules and regulations for field trips.
Amongst all the options listed above, the best option is for the student teacher to "Stand the children in line, going over the safety rules and regulations for field trips". This is because that is the only option that involves prepping the children for the field trip. Standing them in line, makes them ready for the trip, going over the safety rules and regulations makes them alert and active for what they are to expect. Every other option will take their mind away form the trip which is not a good method for prepping.
Which of the following statements is TRUE with regard to communication? Perfect communication is not dependent on a channel and its richness. Communication cannot be used to motivate and control employees in an organization. Perfect communication results in dissimilar mental models. Communication involves the mere imparting of meaning to another person or group. Communication involves the transfer and understanding of meaning.
Answer:
Communication involves the transfer and understanding of meaning.Explanation:
Communication is the process of transferring information from one person to another person. It involves a sender and a receiver. In other words, it requires two or more parties to achieve proper interaction.
Communication involves the transfer and understanding of meaning. The person who conveys or transfers information should be able to convey clear and concise information so the the other party would understand the meaning and the purpose of the interaction.
Thus, effective communication involves three important elements: the sender, the receiver and the message.
The true statement as regards to communication is that communication involves the transfer and understanding of meaning.
The last option is the correct one here. Communication can be described as the ability to convey ones thought to someone else through different channels.
For there to be proper communication, the person that is to receive the message must be able to decipher its meaning and act accordingly.
Read more on communication
https://brainly.com/question/18100115?referrer=searchResults
Jason, a human service professional, can often be found criticizing his clients. What kind of response is this considered?
Answer:
The correct answer is 3) A toxic behavior, which should never be used.
Explanation:
Human services professionals have the important task of helping other people, so they must have different attributes to perform in the best way, among those attributes is respect, empathy, efficiency, trustworthiness, honesty among others.
For example, in the case of Jason, he presents a toxic behavior that is not allowed to be used in his work, since human service professionals must take into account that they cannot judge their clients and that there should be a separation that he is only there to help your customers.
I hope this information can help you.
Jason's criticizing of his clients is considered unprofessional and unethical in the human service field. It undermines the principles of professional ethics and personal respect. Constructive communication is instead recommended.
Explanation:Jason's response can be considered unprofessional and unethical. In the field of human services, professionals are expected to maintain a respectful and supportive attitude towards their clients, regardless of any personal feelings or judgments. Criticizing clients discourages a safe and trusting environment necessary for effective aid and service. This action violates basic principles of professional ethics and personal respect inherent in human service work. By focusing on constructive communication, Jason can better assist his clients, encouraging their growth and development rather than diminishing their self-worth with criticism.
Learn more about Professional Ethics here:https://brainly.com/question/33533508
#SPJ3