why is black history month

Answer:

C. Party independents

Explanation:

A is true because each party has one leader of their group.

B is true because you would want to be loyal and strong.

C is wrong because there are only 2 parties. Democrats and Republican. There are librals but thats another thing.

D is right because the majority leader of congress would get to be in office for congress.

As a result of the defeat of Japan in World War II, the struggle for control of China remain within nationalists and communists.

D. This struggle increase U.S. fears of communist expansion.

The USSR began to spread communism in Asia after Japan overthrow in the second World War.

Two parties fought in China to rule under Chiang Shek (KMT) and Zedong (CCP).

After a long struggle, China accepts the Communist government under the Soviet Union.

The Spread of communism resulted in anxiety in the United States.

The United States favoured capitalism and despised communism.

Thus option D is the correct answer.

Learn more about "Communism" here:

brainly.com/question/12773920

As a result of the defeat of Japan in World War II, nationalists and communists were able to resume their struggle for control of China. This renewed struggle contributed to the Cold War by increasing U.S. fears of communist expansion. The correct answer is option C.

The civil war in China between the Nationalists, led by Chiang Kai-shek, and the Communists, led by Mao Zedong, became a focal point of Cold War tensions. The eventual victory of the Communists in 1949 and the establishment of the People's Republic of China intensified U.S. concerns about the spread of communism in Asia and globally.

This led to increased American efforts to contain communism, including support for anti-communist regimes and involvement in conflicts such as the Korean War.

Answer:

B all air battle in history

Explanation:

I googled it bro lol

to train pilots and aircraft workers

Explanation:

Learn more on military bases on

https://brainly.com/question/10603394

https://brainly.com/question/1459670

#learnwithBrainly

Answer:

false

Explanation:

have a day

Answer:

Past

Explanation:

An archaeologist can't study something that hasn't happened so it can't be future. Something in the present doesn't need to be studied because it's well know. And that leaves you with past. They study old human fossils and other things from our specie's past.

Answer:

He blamed the Second Bank for turmoils

Explanation:

Andrew Jackson vetoed the bill to recharge the Second Bank of the U.S in 1832 because he had blamed the bank for the Panic of 1819 and interrupting politics with too much money. Jackson created pet banks, disabling the nation's currency making it go against monopoly(forced form of market domination whereby a national, regional or local administration, agency or corporation is permitted to be the only provider of a certain products in case of reducing competition) aristocratic "parasites", labor, and foreign domination.

Answer: He believed U.S banks should be for Americans only and cater to average citizens.

Explanation:

Answer: B is correct

Explanation: "popular sovereignty" does not mean Communism or some sort of dictatorship of proletariat or socialist dictatorship. According to Locke, people are inherently good and rational which means they are able to limit their individual freedom in favour of common good, social and political institutions (in does not exclude monarchy or any other form of government).

The philosophies of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke differed significantly in their views on government. Hobbes believed in the necessity of absolute monarchy to prevent chaos and protect society from inherent human selfishness.

The option (B) is correct.

He argued for surrendering individual rights to a strong central authority in a social contract. On the other hand, Locke advocated for popular sovereignty, contending that governments should be based on the consent of the governed.

He emphasized natural rights – life, liberty, and property – and believed in the right of the people to overthrow a government that violated these rights. Their contrasting ideas shaped debates on governance, influencing political thought and systems.

Learn more about absolute monarchy:

https://brainly.com/question/11303613

#SPJ3

Answer:

The United States Constitution outlines the powers of the legislative branch, Congress, which is divided into two houses: the Senate and the House of Representatives. Every state within the country has a legislative branch, which acts in a similar fashion to the federal legislative branch

Answer: Patriotism as the most affectionate feeling of a national entity.

Explanation:

Patriotism can lead to national unity the moment the state elements, sovereignty, and independence of a national entity are threatened. At that moment, if the people have a sense of patriotism, they unite in the protection of their own national identity, tradition, history, and all the elements that make up a single national entity.

Such action has a higher aim, which is to protect society. Such a sense of patriotism makes better individuals, a community that strives for universal ideals. Patriotism is often associated with nationalism. What's wrong, nationalism and patriotism are not synonymous. On the contrary, nationalism can be extremely dangerous, as has been shown several times throughout history.

Answer:

Patriotism is a factor which establishes a more united community. Patriotism allows people to love other people of their country and help them flourish. Patriotism allows people to be united and help each other. As a result, national unity is achieved.

When people in a country remain united and take stand for each other, better communities and better citizens are produced. Patriotism is the factor which builds love and unity in a country.

Explanation:

"Wherever German is spoken and German culture is practiced" according to the poet, it defines Germany as a nation.

Answer: Option D

Explanation:

In "Where is the German's Fatherland," by Ernst Moritz Arndt, everywhere German is being used and German culture is exercised is what distinguishes Germany as per the author. This poem was written in 1813, at the height of French Napoleonic rule.

Arndt is one of the scholarly writers who inspired the patriotism of Germany. He points out that the fatherland of German is where German is spoken and German culture is exercised, so it can be anywhere.

Answer:

wherever German is spoken and German culture is practiced

Explanation:

Answer: The Louisiana Purchase was a land purchase made by United States president, Thomas Jefferson, in 1803. He bought the Louisiana territory from France, which was being led by Napoleon Bonaparte at the time, for 15,000,000 USD. Napoleon Bonaparte sold the land because he needed money for the Great French War.

Answer:

Hiram Rhodes Revels, Blanche K. Bruce, and Jonathan Clarkson Gibbs were African American office holders during the Reconstruction.

Explanation:

The Reconstruction is the era or period in the history of America where the practice of slavery is fully abolished, and the remnants of the Confederate secession is fully removed. Lasting from 1863 to 1877, the period saw the fall of the discriminatory practice of slavery being removed and the black slaves were given a right of their own.

Hiram Rhodes Revels was the first African American to be elected to either house of the Congress. He was also a U.S. senator from the state of Mississippi.

Blanche K. Bruce is also another senator from the state of Mississippi who was the first African American to serve a full term in the U.S. Senate.

Jonathan Clarkson Gibbs was the Secretary of State of Florida and also the Superintendent of Public Instruction for the state of Florida during the Reconstruction.

Answer:

member of the republican party

Explanation:

my brain

Answer:

Shortly after the invasions of the Hittites and the Sea People, Egypt fell into a period of violence and disorder and never regained its power. Who was Ahmose of Thebes? In the mid-1500's BC, he declared himself king and drove the Hyksos, invaders from southwest Asia out of Egypt and ruled all of Egypt.

Explanation:

Final answer:

Ancient Egypt experienced shifts between order and disorder due to internal power struggles, invasions, and social changes. Events like drought, economic crises, foreign invasions by the Sea People and others, as well as modern political upheavals like the Arab Spring, were significant contributors to these shifts.

Explanation:

The events that caused Egypt to oscillate between order and disorder are rooted in a mix of internal strife and external pressures. During periods of a stable ruling dynasty, Egypt enjoyed relative peace and stability within its major kingdoms. In contrast, intermediary periods were marked by turmoil and chaos, as rival groups fought for control, such as when the ruling dynasty broke down. These fluctuations were often reflective of broader regional dynamics, including droughts, grain price surges, tomb robbing, and waves of immigration and violent conflict in the eastern Mediterranean.

Specific events contributing to disorder include the invasion by the Sea People around 1150 BCE, which was part of the broader collapse of the Bronze Age, and the Libyan invasions that led to a lengthy period of political fragmentation. The late Middle Kingdom saw a decline in centralized power, allowing the Hyksos to assert control in Lower Egypt during the Second Intermediate Period. The New Kingdom's collapse introduced foreign dominion in the form of Assyrians, Persians, Greeks, and Romans. In modern times, the Arab Spring of 2011 illustrated a shift towards disorder with massive protests leading to the resignation of President Hosni Mubarak after long-standing grievances against government corruption and lack of democratic reforms.

Answer:

public housing for the poor

Explanation:

apex

C.  Practices that served to increase the power of the clergymen.

Explanation:

The New England Way was a method of examination for knowing the spiritual beliefs to choose church ministers or church members.

This gave them the power to collect taxes, make amendments, hire or fire ministers.

The New England Way was limited to the test procedures which was discarded later by the New England Congregationalists.

The 'New England Way' refers to the orthodox Puritan practices followed by the settlers in the New England colonies in the 17th century North America. These practices permeated the religious, civic, and societal aspects of life, greatly shaping the development of the region.

The term 'New England Way' is primarily associated with the distinctive sociopolitical structure and practices that were adhered to by the Puritans living in the New England colonies during the 17th century in North America. Specifically, 'New England Way' can be best characterized by practices that conformed to orthodox Puritan beliefs (option A). The religious, civic, and societal aspects of the New England Way were tightly interwoven following the Puritanical belief system, thus creating a distinct socio-religious model that pervasively influenced the development of the region.

https://brainly.com/question/38011690

#SPJ6

The Meiji Restoration affected Japan by disbanding the samurai class, accelerating industrialization, and opening up to the Western world.

The Meiji Restoration had a significant impact on Japan.

First, it led to the disbandment of the samurai class and the implementation of a nationwide universal military draft. This change helped to create a strong and centralized military force in Japan.

Second, the Meiji Restoration accelerated the process of industrialization in Japan. The country embraced new technology and modernized its industries, which contributed to its growth and development as a strong nation.

Lastly, the Meiji Restoration also led to Japan's opening up to the Western world and adopting Western practices, which had a profound impact on the country's culture, art, and international relations.

Answer:

Philadelphia.

The Second Continental Congress, addressing the rising tensions with Britain after Lexington and Concord, met in Philadelphia in May 1775.

The Second Continental Congress met in the major city of Philadelphia in May 1775, a pivotal moment following the events at Lexington and Concord. During this congress, the delegates dealt with the outcome of the Conciliatory Proposition from Lord North and the increasing tensions following the clashes between colonial Minutemen and Redcoats. Significant figures like John Hancock, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and Patrick Henry played key roles in the progression towards American Independence. The Congress would continue to meet and guide the American Revolutionary War efforts until it transitioned to the Confederation Congress in 1781.

The Paradox of Value refers to the situation where nonessential items have a higher market value than essential items despite the fact that the latter are crucial for human survival and well-being.

The Paradox of Value, also known as the diamond-water paradox, pertains to the contradiction where nonessential items, like diamonds, often have greater value in the market than essential ones, like water. This phenomenon happens despite the fact that essential goods are critical for our survival and well-being. For this reason, the correct answer to your question would be 'b. high value of a nonessential item and the low value of an essential item.'

https://brainly.com/question/32707273

#SPJ6

Paradox of value involves the contradiction between the value of essential and nonessential items, emphasizing subjective individual values.

Paradox of value refers to the apparent contradiction in economics where something essential, like water, has little monetary value, while nonessential items, like diamonds, have high monetary value. This concept highlights the contradiction between value in use and value in exchange, showcasing how market prices are derived from subjective individual values. The paradox arises from individuals comparing the relative importance of specific goods to them personally.

It is the process plants use to make food.

Answer:

photosynthesis is the process in which plants and some protists get their energy.  They start by taking in sunlight and CO2.  After taking out the needed nutrients, they will release O2.  This is also how all humans haven't died to suffocation.  The CO2 we breath out is converted to O2 by plants.  Hope this helps you out.

Answer:

While the Americans had aimed to hit the Aioi Bridge, their bomb missed the target because of crosswinds. Instead, the bomb detonated directly above the Shima Surgical Clinic, which is considered "ground zero" for the blast.

Explanation:

The Americans scientists  had aimed to hit the Aioi Bridge, their bomb diverted and missed the target because of cross winds. Due to that the bomb detonated directly above the Shima Surgical Clinic, which is considered "ground zero" for the blast.

A monsoon is a seasonal change in the direction of the prevailing, or strongest, winds of a region. Monsoons are seasonal winds that change the weather due to colliding high-pressure and low-pressure systems with divergent temperatures.

They correspond to the variation of wind direction as a result of the seasons. In the summer monsoon, also known as maritime monsoon, the winds travel from the Indian Ocean to the mainland. In the winter monsoon, the winds go from the Asian continent to the ocean.

Therefore, monsoon winds impacted the ease of transporting goods on Indian Ocean trade routes, making travel easier.

Learn more about the monsoon winds here:

https://brainly.com/question/1549271

#SPJ5

In a case whereby historian wants to better understand the causes and historical context of iraqs invasion on kuwait  the sources that would be most helpful to him is B. recorded conversation between Iraq's generals the day before the invasion.

What is the essence of the  recorded conversation?

The taped conversations between Iraq's generals the day before the attack would be a goldmine of information for any historian hoping to gain a deeper understanding of the reasons for and historical background of Iraq's invasion of Kuwait.

Because doing so would give clear insights into the reasons and thought processes of the important decision-makers behind the invasion. Additionally, the generals' discussions will be analyzed to determine any particular events or causes that affected their decision to attack Kuwait.

complete question;

A historian wants to better understand the causes and historical context of Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. Which of these sources would be most helpful to him? 0 A. An American documentary celebrating Kuwait's history and culture 0 B. A recorded conversation between Iraq's generals the day before the invasion 0 C- A timeline outlining each of the war's most important battles O D. A newspaper article condemning the invasion as violating international law

The historian can have an apt understanding of the Iraq invasion of Kuwait, considering political, economic, and geopolitical factors, and other key actors involved.

Some of the resources that can help the historian to have a better understanding of the causes and historical context of the Iraq invasion of Kuwait are:

1. Primary Sources:

  - Official documents: Access government statements, diplomatic cables, and official reports from both Iraq and Kuwait during the time leading up to the invasion.

  - Speeches and interviews: Analyze speeches and interviews given by key leaders, such as Saddam Hussein and Kuwaiti officials, to understand their perspectives and motivations.

2. Historical Accounts and Academic Articles:

  - Academic journals and articles: Consult scholarly works that analyze the events surrounding the invasion, providing context, analysis, and different perspectives on the causes.

  - Books written by historians: Seek out books that offer a comprehensive examination of the historical context, political climate, and factors leading to the invasion.

3. Archival Footage and Media Reports:

  - News reports and documentaries: Watch contemporary news reports and documentaries to gain insights into public perceptions, reactions, and media coverage during the invasion.

  - Archival footage: Examine video footage from the time, including interviews, news clips, and on-the-ground reporting.

4. Government and International Reports:

  - United Nations (UN) reports: Explore UN documents and reports on the invasion and subsequent events, including resolutions and actions taken by the international community.

  - Reports from other governments: Investigate official reports and statements from countries involved or affected by the invasion, such as the United States, United Kingdom, and neighboring Arab nations.

5. Interviews with Key Figures:

  - Oral histories: If available, seek out oral histories or interviews with key figures involved in the decision-making processes, military planning, and diplomatic efforts during the crisis.

6. Analysis of Geopolitical Factors: consider geopolitical factors that may have influenced the invasion, such as regional power dynamics, economic interests, and alliances.

7. Historical Context of the Region: understanding the regional historical context of the Middle East, including the Iran-Iraq War, regional power struggles, and historical grievances that may have contributed to the invasion.

Therefore, by combining these following sources, the historian can have an apt understanding of the Iraq invasion of Kuwait, considering political, economic, and geopolitical factors, as well as the perspectives of key actors involved.

In the 19th century, women were largely confined to the domestic sphere, a situation enforced by both societal norms and legal restrictions. Today, despite major advancements, inequalities still persist in wages, professional representation, and social expectations, though progress towards gender equality continues.

Women's Roles in the 19th Century and Today

In the 19th century, women were largely confined to the domestic sphere, a concept reinforced by societal beliefs and legal limitations. The era's normative separate spheres doctrine decreed distinct roles for men and women, with men participating in public life and women relegated to household management and child-rearing. This segregation was legally endorsed, with women grouped alongside children and the mentally ill in having no legal identity. Furthermore, women had significant restrictions placed on them: they could not vote, own property, sign contracts, initiate divorces, make wills, or partake in higher education and prestigious professions until major social and legal changes began towards the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

Today, while formal legal and educational barriers have been largely dismantled, a separate sphere for women still exists in many respects. Inequality persists in the workplace, reflected in wage gaps, underrepresentation in leadership roles, and the undervaluing of work traditionally seen as feminine. Social norms and expectations continue to assign women the primary role in domestic duties and childcare, even when they also work outside the home. However, there has been significant progress: more women are present in political, academic, and professional fields than ever before, challenging old stereotypes and pushing for a more inclusive society.

The journey from the 19th-century doctrine of separate spheres to today's ongoing fight for gender equality highlights the complexities of women's roles and rights through history and the need for continued advocacy and structural change.

Answer: Legal and illegal flows forced the Native Americans to go to the western parts of the country.

Explanation:

In 1830, an Act of Relocation was passed that referred to five Native American tribes. And if the act itself contained principles in which there was nothing in dispute, in practice it looked different. Many of these tribes were forcibly resettled and treated inhumanely.

The president did not prohibit the use of all methods of intimidation, fraud, manipulation and murder to force the Native American population to signs a relocation agreement. Jackson further suppressed the influence of politicians who supported the Indians in any way, while addressing law enforcement officials who were not coarse enough to handle their duties.

Answer:

increase the size of the Supreme Court so that he could appoint justices who would supply rulings favorable to him

Explanation:

The US Supreme Court first provoked public protests when, in May 1935, during an unprecedented economic crisis, the NIRA (National Industrial Recovery Act), which entered into force on June 16, 1933, was declared unconstitutional. This act became part of the New Deal of Roosevelt to save the country. Like other laws initiated by Roosevelt and adopted during the first “100 days,” the NIRA was extraordinary, well thought out and had one goal - to prevent huge social shocks that could cause an economic crisis at any moment. It was no accident that he was enthusiastically perceived by both businessmen and ordinary workers and employees of America.

However, the laws of the “New Deal” were literally passed in the 'fire order,' with the procedure for adoption curtailed, so the judges of the Armed Forces had arguments to declare them incompatible with the US Constitution. In January 1936, the Supreme Court’s decision abolished the AAA (Agricultural Adjustment Act) system, which was designed to save and restore the country's agriculture - imposing a tax on firms processing agricultural products, which, according to the judges of the Supreme Court, was contrary to the constitution.

In total, from January 1935 to May 1936, the US Supreme Court declared 11 laws that were passed by Congress in 1933-1934 as unconstitutional. The most important changes introduced by the New Deal in the life of American society were threatened, which caused widespread discontent among the population. The actions of the Supreme Court were opposed by the organized labor movement of America. The "revolutionary situation" began to ripen in the country. The presidential election in 1936 was a kind of referendum in favor of the “New Deal” by Roosevelt, turning the Supreme Court into an object of sharp criticism from the indignant public. Under these conditions, on February 5, 1937, Roosevelt sent a message to Congress on the plan of reform of the Supreme Court, which provided for a significant expansion of its composition. Although Congress did not accept the draft, it became apparent that the Supreme Court could no longer remain in its original position. Soon, the judges of the Supreme Court recognized the National Act on Labor Relations as constitutional. In May 1937, the Constitutional Law on Social Insurance was also successfully tested for constitutionality, and in 1939, also the Law on the Regulation of Agriculture of 1938. In essence, under pressure from the public, a legal 'amnesty' for the New Deal's socio-economic reforms took place.

Answer:

increase the size of the Supreme Court so that he could appoint justices who would supply rulings favorable to him

Explanation:

Answer:he mining industry was one of the industries that had great impact for the westward expansion in northamerica. Many people seeking wealth settled in western territories creating small mining towns. These towns were created when the existence of a gold deposit had already been proven but many times they were created only with the rumor that there could be gold there. They were prosperous towns at an economic level until the ore was depleted. Then they left the town. The timber industry began when settlers cut wood to build their settlements on American land. The westward expansion generated high demand for wood supply, which promoted the timber industry by strengthening the US economy. This industry grew by leaps and bounds and already in 1970, 41% of the timber in the United States came from the Pacific Northwest. During the era of the construction of the transcontinental railroad there was a dramatic expansion in agriculture. The number of farms tripled and the number of people living on farms increased to 31 million in 1905. Industrial agriculture favored the westward expansion since with the introduction of agricultural machinery farmers managed to increase crop yields with less labor. Farmers organized into local and regional cooperatives to promote their interests.

Hope this helps :)

Final answer:

Americans were driven to settle on western lands by economic opportunities, such as farming and gold mining, the availability of free land through the Homestead Act, and the belief in Manifest Destiny, which underscored the perceived divine right and duty to expand American civilization westward.

Explanation:

Americans in the new nation were motivated to move to and settle on western lands due to a combination of factors such as the pursuit of economic opportunities, the availability of vast amounts of land, and the ideological belief in Manifest Destiny. The possibility of acquiring land for farming, finding gold, or engaging in other economic activities like cattle ranching presented a powerful lure. Additionally, policies like the Homestead Act of 1862, which offered 160 acres of free land, further encouraged this westward expansion. This movement also aligned with the national ethos of spreading American values and civilization to the West, embodying the idea that it was a divine right and duty of Americans to expand their territory across the continent.

The principle of 'consent of the governed' has evolved from direct democratic concepts in the Declaration of Independence to include a nuanced role for an unelected judiciary in today's interpretation. This reflects an institutional balance that indirectly upholds the will of the people as expressed in the Constitution.

The idea that governments derive their power from the consent of the governed has been a central principle since the Declaration of Independence was written in 1776. At that time, this concept was manifested in the creation of new state governments that variously applied the principle, from experimental constitutions to ones more closely modeling the British system. Over time, the way we interpret this principle has evolved, particularly in the context of the federal judiciary, which is appointed rather than elected, highlighting a sophisticated balance between democratic principles and institutional expertise required to govern.

The United States Constitution and subsequent developments further enshrined the Enlightenment ideas that influenced the founding fathers. The system of checks and balances, along with a division of power across three branches of government, was designed to ensure no single entity could govern without the consent of the other branches, indirectly reflecting the will of the people. Today, with unelected judges and life tenure, this principle is reflected in a judiciary that derives its authority from the Constitution, which itself is an expression of the people’s consent.

While 'consent of the governed' originated with direct implications for legislative and executive branches, it has acquired nuanced interpretations regarding the judiciary. The courts play a critical role in shaping discourse around the extent of government authority, but always within the bounds set by a publically ratified Constitution, and with an understanding that ultimate authority rests with the people, either directly or through their elected representatives.

The correct answer is Interpretations changed to take into account the consent of marginalized groups.

The correct option is (D).

At the time of the Declaration of Independence, the idea that governments derive their power "from the consent of the governed" was largely understood within the context of property-owning men, excluding women, people of color, and other marginalized groups. Over time, interpretations of this idea have evolved to include a broader spectrum of the population. This shift has been a result of social movements, legislative changes, and amendments to the Constitution aimed at extending the right to participate in governance to previously disenfranchised groups. This includes the abolition of slavery, women's suffrage, and the civil rights movement, all of which have redefined what "consent of the governed" means in a modern, more inclusive democracy. Options A, B, and C do not accurately describe the historical development of this concept.

complete question given below:

How did interpretations of the idea that governments derive their power "from the consent of the governed" change between the writing of the Declaration of Independence and today?

A: Interpretations changed to reflect the shrinking popularity of Enlightenment philosophies

B: Interpretations narrowed to allow the government to disregard the consent of most citizens

C: Interpretations expanded to transform the U.S. government into a direct democracy

D: Interpretations changed to take into account the consent of marginalized groups