The correct answer is B. Karl Marx
Explanation:
Karl Marx was a German economist and sociologist mainly known for his proposals and theories in different fields. In terms of sociology, Karl Marx is mainly known for purposing the Conflict Theory in which he stated the history of society and humanity has been characterized by conflict especially by an eternal conflict between the different classes in society that struggle to get political power. Additionally, according to this proposal of class struggle Karl Marx believed it was class struggle and conflict one key factor for the development of the evolution of societies as over time the class that held the power changed. Therefore, the person that believed the history of society was one of class struggle and who proposed a theory based on this was Karl Marx.
Answer:
Karl Marx.
Explanation:
Karl Marx believed that the history of society was one of class struggle.
Bea is 70 years old and works part-time at a discount store. She has kept herself busy by engaging in various activities she enjoyed during middle adulthood. She volunteers occasionally at a local food bank, and enjoys the company of her family and the members of her bridge club. According to the ________ theory of aging, Bea is aging successfully. a. activity b. Kübler-Ross c. disengagement d. wear-and-tear
Answer:
The correct answer choice to the question: According to the _____ theory of aging, Bea is aging successfully, would be, A: Activity theory of aging.
Explanation:
The Activity theory of Aging, also known as the activity theory establishes that in order for a person to face the process of aging in a positive manner, and ensure a good quality of life, he, or she, must maintain a certain level of activity and social engagement with the environment in order to achieve this. The opposite theory would be the Disengagement theory, and the activity theory proposes, unlike the first one, that it is in this social involvement and activity maintenance that people are able to go through the process of aging and be happy. This theory was developed in 1961 by Robert J. Havinghurst.
The theory that suggests Bea is aging successfully is the activity theory. This theory posits that maintaining social connections and staying involved in fulfilling activities can contribute to successful aging.
Explanation:According to the activity theory of aging, Bea is aging successfully. In terms of this theory, the idea is that older adults can remain healthy physically and mentally if they continue to maintain social connections and participate in activities that they consider fulfilling. Activity theory suggests for individuals to enjoy old age and feel satisfied, they must maintain activities and find replacements for the statuses and associated roles they have left behind as they age. Bea's involvement in the food bank, family gatherings, and her club are all activities that help her to stay engaged with her community thereby helping her to age successfully.
Learn more about Activity Theory of Aging here:https://brainly.com/question/6364092
#SPJ11
Who coined the phrase symbolic interactionism?
Herbert Blumer
Max Weber
Lester F. Ward
W. I. Thomas
Herbert Blumer coined the phrase symbolic interactionism.
Symbolic interactionism, a term coined by Herbert Blumer, is a sociological perspective focusing on the symbolic meanings developed through social interactions. Originating from the work of sociologists like George Herbert Mead and W.I. Thomas, it examines how individuals interpret and act on social cues.
Explanation:The term symbolic interactionism was coined by sociologist Herbert Blumer in the mid-twentieth century. This sociological outlook places a strong emphasis on social interactions and the symbolic meanings that people develop and rely upon through the process of social interaction. It stems from the work of early sociology thinkers like George Herbert Mead and W.I. Thomas, though Thomas himself did not use the term.
Symbolic interactionism proposes that people act towards things, including each other, based on the meanings they hold for them, which are derived from their social interactions. These meanings are managed and modified through an interpretive process that each person uses in dealing with outward signs or cues.
Learn more about Symbolic Interactionism here:https://brainly.com/question/34225571
#SPJ6
What are the major factors that affect education systems throughout the world?
Resources and money
Student interest
Teacher interest
Transportation
Answer:
Resources and money
Explanation:
Any education, public or private, must be financed and paid for. Public one is usually paid with taxes and some government help, the private one is fee based.
Resources and money are major factors that affect education because its quality depends on them. If a public school receives adequate financial help it can function better, get better school material, have more facilities, pay the teachers well. On the other hand, many schools worldwide are struggling nowadays because of lack of funding, they can not afford nice rooms and the technology at school is often outdated. Therefore, resources and money are of great importance as they determine the quality of education worldwide.
If you are folding towels that have just come out of the laundry while watching television, you may find that you don't have to pay much attention to the process of folding the towels. This sort of familiar task that does not require much of your attention would be an example of a(n) ________ task.
I think the answer is low-load task.
Hope I helped!
Joachim wants to take his little sister to the zoo. He knows that if he gets out on the highway and takes the last exit that he will be at the zoo because that is how he got there when he went with his mother. His friends have told him that there is a quicker way to get to the zoo if he takes the streets through town, rather than going out on the highway. However, Joachim decides to go to the zoo by way of the highway because of ________.
Answer:
Mental set
explanation
Mental set refers to the framework that we have in our mind which determine the way we evaluate and solve problems that we have in our life.
In general, people tend to choose the framework that they are most familiar with rather than exploring new ones. Because of this, Hoachim decided to stick to the route that he already know rather than following his friend's advice.
Who is more likely to be an expressive leader?
The sales manager of a fast-growing cosmetics company
A high school teacher at a reform school
The director of a summer camp for chronically ill children
A manager at a fast-food restaurant
Answer:
Explanation:
The director of a summer camp for chronically ill children
The director of a summer camp for chronically ill children is most likely to be an expressive leader, as the role requires maintaining group harmony, offering emotional support, and promoting social interactions.
Explanation:An expressive leader is, by definition, someone who helps maintain group harmony, offers emotional support, and promotes social interaction. A role that fits these responsibilities closely would be the director of a summer camp for chronically ill children. This position typically requires a compassionate, caring, and patient person who can manage stressful situations, ensure group harmony, provide emotional and psychological support, and engage in social activities with the children.
Learn more about Expressive Leadership here:https://brainly.com/question/33946204
#SPJ5
Useless Friend. Charles, who is very gullible, is friends with Bobby. Bobby, who cannot be trusted, decides to try to bind Charles to a contract in Bobby's favor. Bobby has Charles sign a contract promising to wash Bobby's car once a week for a month for $80. The contract incorporated by reference terms on the back. The terms on the back were in very small print and required Charles for one year to cook dinner for Bobby, do his laundry, and clean his apartment. Bobby is also very angry with his former girlfriend, Tessa, and decides to start rumors, that would constitute the tort of defamation, such as that she has a vile disease, cheated on tests, and stole from friends. Bobby wants to enlist the help of Charles but knows that Charles would be hesitant to assist in his endeavors. One evening, however, Charles drank too much beer and was clearly intoxicated - a fact apparent to Bobby. Bobby had him sign a contract agreeing to defame Tessa for $50. When he sobers up, Charles tells Bobby that he was drunk and that he has no intention of defaming Tessa, who also happens to be Charles's new girlfriend. He also finally takes a look at the contract involving work for Bobby and tells Bobby that the contract is outrageous and that he has no intentions of going through with any of it. Which of the following is true under the Restatement of Contracts, Section 16, regarding Charles's claim that he should be able to avoid the contract involving Tessa because he was intoxicated?
Under the Restatement of Contracts, Section 16, Charles might have the ability to avoid the contract involving Tessa due to intoxication if he can prove that his intoxication rendered him incapable of understanding the consequences of his actions and the nature of the contract.
Explanation:The Restatement of Contracts, Section 16, provides a basis for avoiding a contract if one party was intoxicated to the extent that they couldn't comprehend the terms or the implications of their agreement. Charles might have grounds to disavow the contract related to defaming Tessa if he can demonstrate that his intoxication was severe enough to impair his judgment significantly. However, simply being intoxicated might not automatically invalidate the contract; Charles needs to prove that his level of intoxication affected his ability to comprehend the contract's terms and implications. This could involve showing that he lacked understanding or that Bobby took advantage of his intoxicated state. If Charles can substantiate this, he might successfully avoid the contract involving Tessa due to his intoxication.
Summary: Charles might be able to avoid the contract involving Tessa if he can prove his intoxication rendered him incapable of understanding the contract's nature and consequences.
Can you think of people in your own life who support or defy the premise that access to technology leads to greater opportunities? How have you noticed technology use and opportunity to be linked, or does your experience contradict this idea?
The use of technology is good as it provides opportunities.
Explanation:
Technology has changed people lives in every possible way.
In the modern world, people are more relying on technology to secure their life as easy as possible.Technologies are good for solving difficulties. However, it is not a good idea that we link too much to it. Many people use cellphone in their daily life, without them, they cannot pass a day because they don't tend to expand their way of life beyond it. People are constant on their cell phones while crossing the street when they are supposed to concentrate on crossing the road.Today people prefer to stay with their cellphone when it comes to communicating with their families or neighbours. Technology fastened us and make us reliant on them.Therefore we can conclude that technology is perfect for people as it makes life easy but relying on it for solving simple things is too much.
Learn more about "technology" here:
brainly.com/question/11447838
While technology has the potential to open doors and create new opportunities, its impact is not universal and can be influenced by a variety of factors.
The premise that access to technology leads to greater opportunities is widely supported by numerous examples in modern society. I
On the other hand, there are instances where technology access does not necessarily translate into greater opportunities.
This can be due to various factors such as socioeconomic status, digital literacy, and the quality of technology available. For example, someone from a low-income background might have access to a smartphone but may not afford the data plans required to fully utilize online resources.
Additionally, without proper digital literacy, the benefits of technology can be limited. In some cases, the overuse or misuse of technology can even have a detrimental effect on an individual's opportunities, leading to decreased productivity, social isolation, or exposure to online scams and misinformation.
Which president signed the Voting Rights Act?
Lyndon Johnson
John F. Kennedy Jr.
Barack Obama
Franklin D. Roosevelt
Answer:
President Lyndon B. Johnson
Explanation:
Lyndon Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act into law on August 6, 1965 to remove obstacles for African American voters.
Explanation:The president who signed the Voting Rights Act was Lyndon Johnson. On August 6, 1965, President Johnson signed the act into law. The Voting Rights Act aimed to remove obstacles for African American voters and prohibited discriminatory laws based on race.
Which of the following would be most relevant to a research paper exploring the benefits of schools growing their own food? Interviews with a master gardener and a landscape designer Lists of plants that are easy to grow and very nutritious Studies comparing the costs of purchasing produce to growing it Testimony from a group of interested students
Answer:
Lists of plants that are easy to grow and very nutritious Studies comparing the costs of purchasing produce to growing it
Lists of plants that are easy to grow and very nutritious. This is the only option that shows the benefits of growing their own food.
The protesters at the Egypt uprising rally were:
a casual crowd
a conventional crowd
a mass
an acting crowd
The protesters at the Egypt uprising rally were an acting crowd. Egypt started to protest against the stifling rule of longtime President Hosni Mubarak. Then, flash mobs appeared. Flash mobs are a large group of people who gather together in spontaneous activity and are examples of collective behavior. The crowd is one of the forms of collective behavior. There are four types of crowds: casual, conventional, expressive and acting. Acting crowds focus on a specific goal or action, such as a protest movement or riot.
A private school sets up a system by which students may advance to the next grade solely on the basis of their individual performance on an exam. Given the wide variety of talents each student has, some students are able to advance to the next grade months or even years before other students. This system is:
Answer:
The answer to the question: This system is:_____, would be: it is a system based on meritocracy, and it is known as a standardized test system, or benchmark testing.
Explanation:
Although nowadays standardized testing has been questioned as an effective method of evaluating the evolvement of a student in his learning process, the truth is that it is still one of the most used systems of evaluation today. The standardized evaluation system, or benchmark testing system, allow a teacher to ensure that all students, especially where there are large numbers, reach an acceptable level of comprehension, before they are allowed to move forward. The problem here lies in the fact that not all students have the same skills and talents, and they learn at different paces. But, benchmarking allows the teacher to understand the basic things he/she needs to know about particular students, even in cases of special needs and abilities, without having to overexert, or device a plan for several numbers of students.
The ________ can be directly attributed to the digital divide, because differential ability to access the internet leads directly to a differential ability to use the knowledge found on the Internet.digital divide
knowledge gap
feminist perspective
e-gap
The knowledge gap can be directly attributed to the digital divide because the differential ability to access the internet leads directly to a differential ability to use the knowledge found on the Internet. The hypothesis of knowledge gap is that people with higher socioeconomic status get the information presented by mass media faster than those with lower socioeconomic status. As a result, this marks a difference between these two segments of society.
When a third party injects him or herself into an existing dispute between a plaintiff and defendant?
Answer:
That third party will gain the status as intervenor
Explanation:
The third party could obtain the status even without the consent of the initial two parties. The only thing that the party need to do is to convince the court that they are heavily influenced by the case between the first and second party. In most cases, Intervenor tend to appear on appellate proceedings. It rarely occurs in higher court level.
Couples who cohabitate before marriage are ______ couples who did not cohabitate before marriage to be married at least ten years.
far more likely than
far less likely than
slightly less likely than
equally as likely as
Answer:
The correct answer is C. slightly less likely than
Explanation:
Some sociologists study marriage in order to find out some causes to the divorce. And they have conducted studies of couples who have lived together before marriage. And it is seen that couples who cohabitate before marriage are slightly less likely than couples who did not cohabitate before marriage to be married at least ten years.
Couples who live together before marriage are slightly less likely to remain married for at least ten years compared to those who do not cohabitate before marriage, though various factors can influence these statistics.
Explanation:Statistical data varies, but generally shows that couples who cohabitate before marriage are slightly less likely than couples who did not cohabitate before marriage to remain married for at least ten years. However, it's essential to remember these statistics can be influenced by many other factors such as age at marriage, education level, cultural beliefs, and so forth, therefore, this does not mean cohabitation before marriage necessarily causes a shorter marriage duration. Rather, it provides a statistical correlation for consideration and further exploration.
Learn more about Cohabitation and Marriage here:https://brainly.com/question/10504269
#SPJ3
Which is not a characteristic of a democracy?
People vote to elect officials.
A king or queen holds the majority of governmental control.
One goal of this type of government is to protect citizens’ basic rights.
A constitution typically outlines the foundational ideas of how this government should operate.
Answer:
B: A king or queen holds the majority of governmental control.
Explanation:
When only one leader, king or queen, holds the majority of governmental control, the country becomes without the participation of the people and their representatives, elected by the vote as happens in democracies. In a system of democratic government there is a belief in freedom and equality between people. This characteristic is not found in monarchy.
The terms “masculine” and “feminine” refer to a person’s _________.
sex
gender
both sex and gender
none of the above
The correct answer is B. Gender
Explanation:
"Gender" and "Sex" are both terms used to classify human beings according to sexuality; however, these two terms are not interchangeable as its essence or definition is different. To begin with, sex refers to the biological aspects of human beings that made them women or men or female or males determined by differences in genes and genitalia. On the other hand, gender refers to the role and identity of individuals that made society and individuals be classified into masculine or feminine; although many other genders have emerged in the last decades. Considering this, it can be concluded, the terms "masculine" and "feminine" refer only to gender as "masculine" and "feminine" do not describe biological aspects of people but roles, and identity of people.
The terms "masculine" and "feminine" refer to a person's gender, second option is correct.
Both the terms "gender" and "sex" are used to categorize people in terms of their sexual orientation, but they are not interchangeable because each term has a distinct definition or essence.
To start, sex refers to the biological characteristics of people—differences in DNA and genitalia—that gave rise to their genders.
Gender, on the other hand, refers to the function and identity of individuals that caused society and people to be labeled as masculine or feminine. However, many additional genders have developed over the past few decades.
Thus, it can be inferred that the labels "masculine" and "feminine" only refer to gender because they do not represent the biological elements of humans but rather their roles and identities.
Learn more about gender, here:
https://brainly.com/question/20813179
#SPJ6
Which would a quantitative sociologists use to gather data?
A large survey
A literature search
An in-depth interview
A review of television programs
I'd say A as the answer.
A quantitative sociologist would use a large survey as the primary method to gather data.
Explanation:A quantitative sociologist would primarily use a large survey to gather data. Surveys allow researchers to collect data from a large sample size in a standardized way, which can be analyzed quantitatively. This method is commonly used to study social phenomena and gather statistical information. While a literature search can be used by sociologists to gather background information on a topic, it is not a direct method of data collection.
An in-depth interview, on the other hand, is a qualitative method that focuses on gathering detailed and personal insights from a smaller sample size. Reviewing television programs may provide some insights, but it is not a primary method of data collection for quantitative sociologists.
Learn more about Data Collection Methods in Sociology here:https://brainly.com/question/15060747
#SPJ5
Elena finds it very difficult to remember a long string of numbers so she tries to memorize three numbers at a time. later she is able to repeat the numbers correctly because she grouped the numbers into more manageable groups of three. this is an example of
Answer:
Chunking
Explanation:
Chunking refers to the act of gathering small individual information into several groups in order to address the shortage of space in our short term memory.
For examples , let's say that Someone's phone number is '87610989'. In order to memorize it ,.Most people will find it easier to chunk that information and remember it as 8761 - 9089
Elena's method of remembering strings of numbers in groups of three demonstrates the concept of 'chunking'. This technique involves breaking down data into manageable chunks for easier processing and recall. Elaborative rehearsal, a method of linking new data to memory already stored and repeating the information, is another effective way to improve memory retention.
Explanation:The example you provided where Elena remembers a long string of numbers by grouping them into smaller groups of three is known as chunking. Chunking is a strategy in which information is organized into manageable bits, making it easier to remember. This method is commonly used for memorization tasks such as recalling phone numbers or dates. By separating the information into smaller chunks, the brain is able to process and recall the information more effectively.
Another example of chunking is when learning the order of the planets in our solar system, a mnemonic device such as the name Mr. VEM J. SUN can be used to recall the correct order: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. Similarly, memory can be enhanced through elaborative rehearsal, which involves linking new information to knowledge already stored in your memory, and repeating this information. For instance, if you were trying to remember the number 520, you could link it to the fact that it's an area code for Arizona.
In brief, chunking and elaborative rehearsal are both effective strategies for increasing memory retention, allowing larger bits of data to be absorbed more easily, and then retained in long-term memory over time. They represent various levels of processing, suggesting that the deeper we process information, the better we retain it.
Learn more about Chunking here:
https://brainly.com/question/4758128
#SPJ12
Over extended periods of time, population growth A. has uncertain effects on the standard of living. B. has no effect on the standard of living. C. clearly lowers the standard of living. D. clearly raises the standard of living.
Over extended periods of time, population growth has uncertain effects on the standard of living.
Over extended periods of time, population growth has uncertain effects on the standard of living, because not all factors that influence it are captured by GDP, such as infant mortality rates, availability of goods, environmental quality, and crime rates.So,option A is correct.
The question of how population growth affects the standard of living can be complex. Factors such as a decline in infant mortality, a greater variety of goods, a dirtier environment, and a declining crime rate can all affect the standard of living in ways that might not be fully captured by Gross Domestic Product (GDP). For instance, a decline in infant mortality and a greater variety of goods would undoubtedly raise the broad standard of living, yet these improvements might not be directly reflected in GDP. At the same time, a dirtier environment would reduce the broad standard of living, but again, this may not be counted within GDP figures. Conversely, a lower crime rate would improve the standard of living but not be directly measurable through GDP. Therefore, over extended periods of time, population growth has uncertain effects on the standard of living because GDP does not account for all factors that contribute to well-being.
Tina is a 7-year-old girl who frequently witnesses her father's anger and physically abusive acts on her mother. Later, when she's in her room playing with her toys, she begins to yell at them and hit them for “being so stupid and not having dinner ready.” Her behavior is a clear example of:
Answer:
observational learning.
Explanation:
The answer is observational learning because this type of learning happens indirectly through watching and copying what others do therefore, in this scenario that is what indeed happened.
Tina, a 7-year-old girl, is exhibiting the psychological concept of Modeling, part of Observational Learning. She is replicating the abusive behavior she witnesses at home, demonstrating the impact such environments can have on children's behavior and development.
Explanation:Tina's behavior demonstrates a psychological concept known as Modeling, an element of Observational Learning where an individual imitates or copies behavior they witness. Here, Tina is replicating the abusive behavior and language she sees in her home environment. This situation is concerning because if Tina continues to see this behavior as normal, she could potentially incorporate it into her future relationships.
This aligns with the disorganized attachment pattern, often witnessed in children who have been abused. It is vital to provide a safe and nurturing environment for children to ensure they model positive behavior. Tina's case is a clear reminder of the long-lasting effects that abusive environments can have on a child's mental and emotional development and behavior.
Learn more about Modeling here:https://brainly.com/question/36511491
#SPJ3
When the League of Women Voters successfully achieved its goal of women being allowed to vote, they had to undergo frame __________, a means of completely changing their goals to ensure continuing relevance.
extension
amplification
bridging
transformation
Answer:
Transformation
Explanation:
When a social movement reaches its goal, there is a risk that this movement will lose its relevance. This is because, if the goal was achieved, people no longer want to fight for that cause and the social movement begins to appear less and less
For this reason, it is necessary that whenever a social movement reaches its goal, this movement goes through a transformation, where a complete revision of the objectives of that social movement takes place.
With transformation, members of the social movement can formulate new goals that must be achieved. So the movement remains relevant, because the struggle continues.
This happened in the suffragist movement. When women won the right to vote, there were still many issues that led to women's lack of rights and freedoms. For this reason, the suffragist movement had to undergo a transformation, this transformation defined new goals that were fighting for women's rights.
According to the study cited by the U.S. Census Bureau, children who live with married parents grow up with more advantages than children who live with:a divorced parent
a single parent
a grandparent
all of the above
Answer: the correct answer is all of the above.
Explanation: A child development is influenced in many ways such as their background, health and environment.. Children go through significant family changes such as a family break-up or a new step-family. These can affect a child's emotional and intellectual development.
According to the study cited by the U.S. Census Bureau, children who live with married parents grow up with more advantages than children who live with all of the above. D is the correct option.
This includes children who live with divorced parents, single parents, or grandparents.
The study found that children who live with married parents are more likely to be:
HealthyWell-educatedFinancially stableHappySuccessful in their careersLess likely to commit crimesLess likely to be involved in substance abuseThe study also found that children who live with married parents have stronger relationships with their parents and siblings. They are also more likely to be involved in their communities and to have positive role models.
Of course, there are many factors that contribute to a child's well-being, and not all children who live with married parents will have a perfect childhood.
However, the study provides strong evidence that children who live with married parents are more likely to have a successful and fulfilling life.
Here are some of the reasons why children who live with married parents tend to have more advantages:
Married parents are more likely to have higher incomes and more resources.
Married parents are more likely to be involved in their children's lives.
Married parents are more likely to provide a stable and consistent environment for their children.
Children who grow up in a two-parent household are more likely to learn about healthy relationships.
Of course, there are many exceptions to this rule. There are many children who live with single parents or grandparents who do very well. However, the research suggests that children who live with married parents are more likely to have a positive start in life.
Learn more about Children, here:
https://brainly.com/question/14852494
#SPJ4
Why do people join utilitarian organizations?
Because they feel an affinity with others thereBecause they receive a tangible benefit from joiningBecause they have no choiceBecause they feel pressured to do so
The correct answer is B. Because they receive a tangible benefit from joining
Explanation:
In sociology, organizations or groups of people that have a common purpose are classified into three main types these are normative organization, coercive organizations, and utilitarian organizations. In the case of utilitarian organizations, these are joined by people because through this they can get a tangible benefit that in most cases is necessary for society such as going to school and multiple educational levels to get a diploma. This implies utilitarian organizations are neither voluntary or forced but linked to specific purposes or benefits rather than personal rewarding. Therefore, the reason people join utilitarian organizations is that they receive a tangible benefit from joining.
The people join utilitarian organizations because they receive a tangible benefit from joining. Therefore, the correct option is 2.
Utilitarian organizations often offer tangible benefits to their members. These benefits can include access to resources, services, discounts, educational opportunities, or professional networking. People may join to take advantage of these benefits and enhance their personal or professional lives. They may engage in activities such as promoting utilitarian principles, conducting research and scholarship related to utilitarianism, organizing events and conferences.
Thus, the ideal selection is option 2.
Learn more about utilitarian organizations here:
https://brainly.com/question/28192959
#SPJ6
The complete question might be:
Why do people join utilitarian organizations?
1. Because they feel an affinity with others there
2. Because they receive a tangible benefit from joining
3. Because they have no choice
4. Because they feel pressured to do so
Which of the following is not a technological way of improving air quality?
a. using electrostatic precipitators
b. installing solar panels
c. composting
d. building wind turbines
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A B C D
Answer:
c. composting
Explanation:
The composting is a process through which organic matter has been decomposed. This is done in order to produce lot of biomass, mix it with ground, rocks, ashes, and create a very fertile soil that will contribute to much better plant growth. This process is used for the agriculture and horticulture, but it is in no way connected to the improvement of the air quality, nor it is a technological thing.
In 2014, what was the largest city in the world?Delhi
New York
Shanghai
Tokyo
Answer: Tokyo was the largest city in the world in 2014
In 2014, Tokyo was the largest city in the world.
Why do we have such a high crime/violence rate in the U.S.? <br /><br />Sociology Social Problems Course
Answer: the crime rate isn't as high as it seems to be. The crime rate is high in the cities, but low in the rural and suburban areas.
Most cities are extremely liberal, making it practically impossible for good citizens to own a gun for self defense. For this reason, urban criminals know that their intended victims are helpless, and they can commit violent crimes with impunity. (Suburban and rural criminals are strongly deterred from their potential crimes by the presence of armed citizens.)
Explanation: Cities are also home to vast numbers of government dependents, broken homes, and fatherless children. Fatherless children with unstable home environments have a much higher likelihood of turning to crime, joining gangs, etc. American cities skew the statistics for the country as a whole — but if you take the cities OUT of the statistics, then America is one of the safest places in the world.
Final answer:
The high crime/violence rate in the U.S. can be attributed to social problems such as income inequality, racism, and easy access to firearms, combined with public misperception fueled by media coverage. Technological tools like CompStat in NYC demonstrate the effectiveness of data-driven approaches to reducing crime. Geographical and demographic patterns further influence crime rates, with the U.S. placed between regions of high and low crime rates globally.
Explanation:
The high crime/violence rate in the U.S. is a multifaceted issue that can largely be attributed to a variety of social problems such as income inequality, lack of opportunity, racism, poverty, poor schools, gang activity, drug and alcohol abuse, and easy access to firearms. The perception of crime rates is often influenced by media coverage, leading to an inaccurate public view that crime is worsening, despite statistics indicating a decline in violent and gun-related crimes since the early 1990s. Another contributing factor to the crime rate in the U.S. is the disproportionate lengths of prison sentences for gun-related crimes as compared to non-violent crimes, a disparity not seen in many European countries.
In addition to these factors, geographical and demographic patterns also play a role in crime rates, with Social Disorganization Theory positing that the social context of neighborhoods impacts the frequency and type of criminal behavior. Technological tools like CompStat have been employed successfully in New York City to manage crime rate patterns using quality of life and crime data, showcasing that data-driven policing strategies can aid in making neighborhoods safer. However, worldwide, crime rates continue to exhibit variability with regions like Latin America and Africa experiencing much higher homicide rates compared to areas such as Europe and East Asia, with the United States falling somewhere between these extremes.
Explain how an absolute monarchy differs from a dictatorship.
Answer:
Dictatorship is an office that has been gotten through force, and a monarchy or crown is reign that is passed from one generation to another.
Explanation:
In comparison to a monarchy which is a dominion that is passed down from one generation to the next, a dictatorship is an authority that has been acquired via force.
What is monarchy?The Head of State in a monarchy is the king or queen. The Head of State is the Sovereign, but an elected Parliament is responsible for drafting and approving laws. This is mostly seen in Britain.
When a single person or commander is in charge of a government, it is considered a dictatorship. Military coups, insurrections, or elected officials who refuse to vacate their positions are all ways that the dictatorial government can come about.
Limited, constitutional, and absolute monarchies are the three types of monarchies. The king under an absolute monarchy is supreme and in charge of all decisions. In this place, the king or queen can impose any law.
Learn more about absolute monarchy, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28022005
#SPJ5
According to the concept of the power elite, why would a celebrity such as Charlie Sheen commit a crime?
Because his parents committed similar crimes
Because his fame protects him from retribution
Because his fame disconnects him from society
Because he is challenging socially accepted norms
Because his fame protects him from retribution
Final answer:
The power elite theory posits that celebrities may commit crimes because their fame provides a shield against typical punishment, and their elite status can disconnect them from societal norms. This results in minimal legal consequences for their actions, exemplifying the imbalance within the judicial system that favors the wealthy and powerful.
Explanation:
According to the concept of the power elite, a celebrity may commit a crime due to the perceived protection their fame offers from conventional retribution. This protection can sometimes disconnect them from society's norms and responsibilities, leading to criminal behavior. Celebrities have a significant amount of international power, and their actions can greatly impact society. The theory states that society's rules are often skewed in favor of the powerful elite, enabling them to manipulate these rules to maintain their position. Consequently, celebrities can sometimes engage in criminal acts while suffering minimal legal consequences, as seen in the low incarceration rates of NFL players convicted of domestic violence. Examining the influence of fame shows how it intertwines with money and high social status, granting those in the spotlight a degree of power that can skew the legal consequences they face for their actions.
Crime is not limited to the underprivileged; it also includes acts by the wealthy and powerful that go largely unpunished. This is well-illustrated by the minimal punishments often dealt to high-status individuals, such as corporate executives involved in white-collar crime, who rarely face imprisonment. The concept of the power elite elucidates why some behaviors are more likely to be considered deviant and why certain individuals from specific social backgrounds are more likely to be punished for such behavior. This imbalance in the justice system reveals the disadvantages that the poor and minorities face, lacking the resources to defend themselves as effectively as those with more wealth and influence.
Moby, a resident of New Jersey, has an accident with Ogden, a resident of Illinois, while driving through that state. Ogden files a suit against Moby in Illinois Moby files a Motion to Dismiss and refuses to come to Illinois. How will the Illinois Court get jurisdiction over Moby ?
Answer: the court will use in personam jurisdiction.
Explanation:
Personal jurisdiction is the court's authority to determine personal rights and liabilities of the parties before it. Under personal jurisdiction the court has the authority to decide matters of a particular defendant (in personam jurisdiction) or an item of property (in rem jurisdiction).