Answer:
Benjamin Harrison.
Explanation:
Benjamin Harrison was born in Ohio. He did graduate with honors in 1854.
He won the presidency in 1888 but before as senator he supported civil war pensioner, opposition to the railroads magnates and civil service reform.
What two countries were engaged in a negotiation that the Lodge Corollary disallowed?
Mexico and Japan
Nicaragua and France
Colombia and Japan
Mexico and Spain
Answer:
The two countries that were engaged in a negotiation that the Lodge Corollary disallowed were Mexico and Japan.
Explanation:
The Lodge Corollary, approved by the United States Senate in 1912, expanded the Monroe doctrine to also cover the actions of corporations and associations controlled by foreign states.
In 1912, it seemed that Japanese businessmen were about to buy huge tracts of land from Baja California, in Mexico, on the border with southern California. Lodge proposed and the Senate ratified what has come to be known as the Lodge Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine. The United States would not allow foreign interests of any kind to grant to a foreign government "a power of control for practical purposes" over any territory in this hemisphere. The Japanese government immediately denied that it had any relationship with the investors and the sales deals of the Baja, if there had been any, evaporated.
What confession does Hester make to Dimmesdale while in the forest in Chapter 17 of The Scarlet Letter? A. She admits that Chillingworth is her husband. B. She confesses to a second affair. C. She tells him that Pearl is his daughter. D. She admits that she never really loved him.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
She admits that Chillingworth is her husband.
Answer:
A. She admits that Chillingworth is her husband.
Explanation:
In this chapter, Hester and Dimmesdale meet in the forest in order to be able to talk without anyone finding out. Once they have ensured their privacy, Hester confesses to Dimmesdale that Chillingworth is her husband. She also tells him that Chillingworth will most likely reveal their secret. After Dimmesdale recovers from the news, the two decide to escape the town and begin a new life together.
Which of the following was not a result of the Lincoln-Douglas debates?
Douglas was elected senator of Illinois.
Lincoln’s national profile was raised.
Citizens in both the North and South followed the debates closely.
Lincoln successfully defended the principle of popular sovereignty.
Answer:
Lincoln successfully defended the principle of popular sovereignty.
Explanation:
They were also known as the Great Debates of 1858. They were seven debates held between the candidate for Senator of Illinois, Abraham Lincoln and the incumbent Senator, Stephen Douglas. The main issue discussed in the debates was slavery.
Douglass was the one who defended the principle of popular sovereignty, this was letting the people of a territory decide for themselves whether to allow slavery or not. Lincoln was against it because he said that popular sovereignty would perpetuate slavery.
I hope this answer helps you.
Answer:
Lincoln successfully defended the principle of popular sovereignty.
Explanation:
Lincoln successfully defended the principle of popular sovereignty was not a result of the Lincoln-Douglas debates.
Which options best describe similarities of the Byzantine and Arab Empires?
(Select all that apply.)
One man was responsible for each empire’s religion; Constantine instituted Christianity, and Muhammad instituted Islam.
Greek gods influenced religious practices; the Greek god Apollo was discussed in Christianity, and Aphrodite was discussed in Islam.
Religion unified both empires; Christianity unified the Byzantine Empire, and Islam unified the Arab Empire.
Scriptures dictated moral behavior; the Bible dictated Byzantine moral behavior, and the Koran dictated Muslim moral behavior.
Answer:
After the death of Muhammad, Arab leaders were called caliphs.
Caliphs built and established Baghdad as the hub of the Abbasid Caliphate.
Baghdad was centrally located between Europe and Asia and was an important area for trade and exchanges of ideas.
Scholars living in Baghdad translated Greek texts and made scientific discoveries—which is why this era, from the seventh to thirteenth centuries CE, is named the Golden Age of Islam.
A love of knowledge was evident in Baghdad, established in 762 CE as the capital city of the Abbasid Caliphate in modern-day Iraq. Scholars, philosophers, doctors, and other thinkers all gathered in this center of trade and cultural development.. Academics—many of them fluent in Greek and Arabic—exchanged ideas and translated Greek texts into Arabic.
Chief Muslim leaders after Muhammad’s death were referred to as Caliphs.The era of the Abbasid Caliphs’ construction and rule of Baghdad is known as the Golden Age of Islam. It was an era when scholarship thrived.
Explanation:
The correct answers are A) One man was responsible for each empire’s religion; Constantine instituted Christianity, and Muhammad instituted Islam, C) Religion unified both empires; Christianity unified the Byzantine Empire, and Islam unified the Arab Empire, and D) Scriptures dictated moral behavior; the Bible dictated Byzantine moral behavior, and the Koran dictated Muslim moral behavior.
The Byzantine Empire was part of the Roman Empire and was divided in 395 AD and still followed the Christian principles established by Emperor Constantine in Rome. The capital city of the Byzantine Empire was Constantinople and the official language changed from Latin to Greek.
The Muslim nation was unified by Islam through the teachings of Prophet Mahoma and the Quran.
In what ways were antebellum feminists radical? In what ways were they traditional?
Women partook in all the antebellum changes, from abolition to transcendentalism. From multiple points of view, traditional perspectives on women as nurturers caused them to invest themselves in this.
A few women pushed a considerably larger job for themselves and other women by teaching youngsters and men what they called strong republican standards.
It was, though, by working towards the goal of abolitionism that many women saw their situation as not very different of those who were of black skin.
Even though they were doing something revolutionary and pushing towards the freedom of black people, most abolitionists were still men of their time, with this idea that there were gender roles. Also, those old white man would frequently keep women and blacks from getting an administration position in the American Anti-Slavery Society.
Antebellum feminists were radical in that they challenged the status quo of gender roles, especially through their involvement in abolitionism, equating their oppression to slavery. Nonetheless, they also adhered to traditional roles, as demonstrated by their active roles in temperance and education, driven by notions of women's nurturing and morally superior nature.
Explanation:Antebellum feminists were considered radical because they challenged traditional gender roles, particularly through their involvement in the abolitionist movement. These feminists likened their oppression by males to the enslavement of African Americans, which was a bold comparison for that era. They formed female anti-slavery societies, asserting their capacities to engage in public discourse and decision-making, which were traditionally male-dominated realms. Notably, figures such as Lydia Maria Child, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucy Stone, and Susan B. Anthony spearheaded these radical endeavors.
However, antebellum feminists also upheld certain traditional values and roles. Their participation in reforms including temperance and education was often influenced by societal expectations of women as nurturing and moral guardians of the home. This perspective, known as 'Republican Motherhood', upheld the belief that women, due to their inherently moral nature, had the critical role of educating children in republican principles. In this way, they straddled the line between asserting new rights and conforming to expected feminine roles.
Learn more about Antebellum Feminism here:https://brainly.com/question/30375867
#SPJ3
What does the case of Mary Dyer in 1660 illustrate? a. Puritans practiced a fierce rhetoric but were lenient in practice. b. Quakers had a tenuous grasp on the social realities of the English colonies. c. Quakers were willing to defy authority even at their own personal risk and expense. d. Quakers practiced their religion without a church and without clergy.
Answer: c. Quakers were willing to defy authority even at their own personal risk and expense.
Explanation:
Mary Dyer (1611–1660) was an American Puritan who became a Quaker and one of the Boston martyrs. Just like Marmaduke Stephenson, William Robinson and William Leddra of Barbados, also from the Society of Friends, Mary was sentenced to death and hung for repeatedly resisting a Puritan order that forbade Quakers in the colony, following the authority of the Massachusetts Bay Colony.
The winner of the 1840 election was ________.
a Democrat
a Democratic-Republican
an Anti-Federalist
a Whig
Answer:
The correct answer is D. a Whig
Explanation:
The elections for president of the united states in the year of 1840 was held by the Democrat Martin Van Buren, who was fighting to be re-elected, and the head of the Whig party called William Henry Harrison. The winner was William H. Harrison who was a Whig.
William Henry Harrison, a Whig, won the 1840 U.S. presidential election, signifying the influence of the Whig Party during the second party system era.
This marked a significant point in the second party system era in the United States, which had replaced the older Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties with the new Democratic and Whig parties. The Whigs, known for supporting internal improvements and having a diverse stance on issues like moral reform and the abolition of slavery, elected not only Harrison but also Zachary Taylor as presidents during their existence.
imagine a researcher is interested in frequency of self disclosure and measures self disclosure from a sample of undergraduates by asking them to get to know one another. researchers recorded the conversations and counted the number of self disclosure. what level of measurment is self disclosure in this example
Answer:
particular measurement
Explanation:
Client-initiated self-disclosure is used in this example.
Self-disclosure refers generally to a counselor's sharing of personal information with clients during or outside the counseling session.There are four types of self-disclosure.The types of self-disclosure are accidental, unavoidable, client initiated, and deliberate.The given example comes under client-initiated self-disclosure.Client-initiated disclosures occur when clients seek and find information about their counselor on print or online media, etc.Generally speaking, the disclosure of personal counselor information to clients through accidental, unavoidable, and client-initiated means is thought to blur the boundaries of the counselor-client relationship.Learn more about disclosure, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/12913720
#SPJ2
The Truman administration tried to help Europe recover from the devastation of World War II with the ________.
Economic Development Bank
Atlantic Free Trade Zone
Byrnes Budget
Marshall Plan
Answer:
D) Marshall Plan
What were the benefits of the transportation revolution?
Railroads were faster, cheaper, and had greater range than canals, but still grew only gradually at first. The transportation revolution produced the rapid growth of towns and cities.
Even while railroads outperformed canals in terms of speed, cost, and range, their initial growth was still modest. The fast rise of towns and cities was a result of the transportation revolution.
What is transportation revolution?With the use of canals, steamboats, and railroads, the growth of domestic trade in America significantly grew. The Transportation Revolution came to be known as a result of these technological developments.
Early 1800s developments in transportation networks had a significant impact on America's economy. Markets expanded as a result of the building of roads, canals, and railroads, which also made it easier for people to move around and changed the physical environment.
The American transportation revolution occurred in the 19th century. As a result, crucial modes of transportation like as canals, railroads, and steamboats were developed in the 1800s. The future of the country was dramatically broadened by the transportation revolution.
Thus, Even while railroads outperformed canals in terms of speed.
For more information about transportation revolution, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/691214
#SPJ2
Border ruffians helped to ________.
chase abolitionists out of Missouri
elect a proslavery legislature in Kansas
capture runaway slaves
disseminate abolitionist literature in Kansas
Answer:
Border ruffians helped to chase abolitionists out of Missouri.
Explanation:
The Border Ruffians were a private army raised by the big slave owners of Missouri, at a time when the history of cotton farming was marked by political conflict over the gaining of new lands in the west, shortly before the Civil War.
They were involved in the bloody events of Bleeding Kansas, at the time of a political race between abolitionists and slavers to determine whether Kansas, created in 1861 as a state, with two representatives in the Senate, would be a slave state or not.
The Missouri slave owners were actively campaigning for the United States to remain a slave country. They had created the Border Ruffians, which crossed the western shore of Missouri to the neighboring lands of Kansas Territory, where they were engaged in the armed struggle against abolitionists like John Brown.
By March 1855, the Missouri Border Ruffians invaded Kansas during the first election in the territory and imposed a pro-slavery legislature. In 1857, the governor of the Kansas Territory dismissed them and a fragile peace was established.
Two of their leaders was Douglas County Sheriff Samuel J. Jones from Missouri and Benjamin Franklin Stringfellow, Missouri General Attorney.
Consider social, political, and economic equality. In what ways did Radical Reconstruction address and secure these forms of equality? Where did it fall short?
The Reconstruction tried to generate opportunities to end the segregation between white Americans and African Americans in the Southern States by giving them job opportunities and voting rights so they could be elected into important political roles.
During the Reconstruction African Americans were able to enjoy family bonds and tried to make a way for former slaves buying land to cultivate.
The problem was that the way Reconstruction was imposed created a brutal reaction in southern whites, that believed that they were stripped of their liberty, because of that many became committed to keeping blacks in a subservient position. With the election of President Johnson Reconstruction changed and the land was returned to white landowners which avoided land redistribution in the South.
The sharecropping system was a way of maintaining those ex-slaves and African Americans dependent on the landowners, it limited economic development and ensured that the South remained an agricultural location.
As we can see, the Reconstruction fell short of accomplishing its objectives because at the end it caused resentment in the Southern states, which backfired in the Black Codes and the creation of a series of white supremacy groups.
Radical Reconstruction implemented constitutional amendments to secure civil and political rights for African Americans, made strides in economic equality through public investments, and taxation policies. However, it fell short in protecting these rights from being undermined by discriminatory practices deployed by White Southerners with the end of Reconstruction.
Explanation:The Radical Reconstruction period following the Civil War brought forth ambitious efforts to address social, political, and economic inequality in the United States, particularly with respect to the civil rights of former slaves in the South. Social equality advancements were driven by new amendments to the Constitution. The Fourteenth Amendment granted African Americans citizenship and the Fifteenth Amendment secured the voting rights of African American men, while the Thirteenth Amendment officially abolished slavery.
Politically, Reconstruction helped to incorporate African Americans into the political process, with some regions of the South seeing a rise in African American politicians. However, the gains made were pushed back when the Reconstruction era ended and White Southerners regained political control, effectively implementing discriminatory laws known as Jim Crow laws that severely restricted African American rights and freedoms.
Economically, Reconstruction governments worked to reduce prevailing inequality by investing in public education and infrastructure, and by implementing property and land taxes. However, a loophole in the Fifteenth Amendment did not explicitly ban literacy tests and polling taxes, which were often used to disenfranchise African Americans. So, while the Radical Reconstruction period made significant strides in addressing various forms of inequality, it fell short in firmly securing these rights in the face of white supremacist opposition and discriminatory practices in both the North and the South.
Learn more about Radical Reconstruction here:https://brainly.com/question/30313274
#SPJ3
What was the primary goal of Britain’s wars for empire from 1688 to 1763?
control of North America
control of American Indians
greater power in Europe and the world
defeat of Catholicism
Final answer:
The primary goal of Britain's wars from 1688 to 1763 was to achieve greater power in Europe and the world, resulting in a dominant global presence and the consolidation of territories, particularly in North America.
Explanation:
The primary goal of Britain’s wars for empire from 1688 to 1763 was greater power in Europe and the world. During this period, commonly known as the age of British Imperial wars, Britain engaged in near-continuous conflict with France and Spain. These wars included disputes over North American territories that also involved forming alliances with Native American tribes. The ultimate aim was to eliminate European competition in the New World and to establish a dominant British presence on the global stage.
Specifically, the series of conflicts, such as King William's War, Queen Anne's War, and King George's War, each had its origins in European disputes but spilled over into the colonies. The decisive British victories, especially during the Seven Years' War, consolidated British power over their European rivals and led to significant territorial gains, including the control of large parts of North America.
Which of the following was not a factor in the transportation revolution?
the steam-powered locomotive
the canal system
the combustion engine
the government-funded road system
Answer:
the combustion engine
Explanation:
The construction of canals, railroads, and roads were the most significant transformations of America in the early 1800. It caused the markets to expend, altered the landscape, and made it easier for people to move and travel for any reason. The combustion engine would only be invented a few decades later.
What was the “conspiracy” of the New York Conspiracy Trials of 1741?
American patriots conspiring to overthrow the royal government
indentured servants conspiring to overthrow their masters
slaves conspiring to burn down the city and take control
Protestants conspiring to murder Catholics
The correct answer is C. Slaves conspiring to burn down the city and take control
Explanation:
The New York Conspiracy Trials of 1741 , also known as Slave Insurrection of 1741 were a series of events in which mainly slaves (although it is believed a small white and poor population participated) decided to revolt and cause different firers in all New York City with the purpose of conspiring against the government and establish a new one. Indeed during this year, more than 13 fires occurred in the city and this made the government suspect of a plot behind all of these fires, which led to the arrests fo many slaves and around 100 were executed for this. Therefore, the conspiracy in the New York Conspiracy Trials of 1941 was that slaves conspired to burn down the city and take control.
The New York Conspiracy Trials of 1741 were about an alleged plot by slaves and poor whites to burn down the city and overthrow the colonial authorities.
Explanation:The New York Conspiracy Trials of 1741 were an event in the history of the Province of New York, where authorities in New York City arrested, tried and executed several people accused of being part of a plot led by enslaved Blacks and poor whites. The perceived 'conspiracy' involved these individuals allegedly planning to burn down the city and overthrow the colonial authorities to establish their control. This has been recorded as one of the most significant slave rebellions in the Colonial America.
Learn more about New York Conspiracy Trials here:https://brainly.com/question/12881165
#SPJ3
Which of the following was a goal of the Spanish in their destruction of Fort Caroline?
establishing a foothold from which to battle the Timucua
claiming a safe place to house the New World treasures that would be shipped back to Spain
reducing the threat of French privateers
locating a site for the establishment of Santa Fe
Answer:
Reducing the threat of French privateers
Explanation:
Fort Caroline was a French colony that was located in the US, it was built as a refuge for the Huguenots that were members of the Protestant Reformed Church of France, Catholics, and agnostics.
At the same time, Spain was spreading its influence in South and Central America through its sea routes. This sparkled uneasiness into the Spanish that was concerned with the French settlement because the Spanish needed the Florida coast.
Because of that, Spanish Admiral Pedro Menendez attacked the colony, about 350 men were killed.
Answer: reducing the threat of French privateers
Explanation:
I took the test
Why was the Mongol’s invasion’s effect on Hungary different from the invasion’s effect on Russia?
Answer:
Reports of the Mongol attacks terrified Europe. The Mongols increased their empire using swift and decisive attacks with an armed and disciplined cavalry. They wiped out the populations of some entire towns that resisted—as was their usual policy—depopulating some regions and confiscating the crops and livestock from others. This type of total warfare spread panic even among Europeans not directly affected by the Mongol onslaught and sent refugees fleeing westward.
Explanation:
The impact of the Mongol invasion was different for Hungary and Russia due to the Mongols' brief but brutal occupation of Hungary and the extended subjugation and political restructuring in Russia. Hungary eventually recovered, while Russia became a vassal to the Golden Horde, affecting its historical trajectory.
The Mongol invasion of Europe in 1241 had a devastating impact on Hungary, culminating in the Battle of Mohi, where the Hungarian army was annihilated. The Mongols slaughtered a significant portion of the population and left the kingdom vulnerable. On the other hand, the impact on Russia was different because the Mongols exploited the existing political fragmentation to conquer and subjugate the Russian city-states, leaving a lasting influence that shifted power to Moscow. The prince of Muscovy, who aligned with the Mongols, played a key role as an intermediary, enhancing Moscow's prominence over historic centers like Kiev.
While in Hungary the invasion was brutal but brief due to the Mongols' withdrawal following Ögedei Khan's death, in Russia the Mongol rule established the Golden Horde, which resulted in long-term vassalage. This divergence partly stemmed from Hungary's ability to recover and remain independent, compared to the extended period of subjugation that Russia experienced under Mongol rule, which some historians suggest impeded Russia's modernization compared to other European nations.
An example of a push factor would be
educational opportunities.
job opportunities
poverty
religious freedom
Answer:
poverty
Explanation:
A push factor is a factor that is making the people to migrate away from a certain place. These factors are numerous, but one of the most common is the poverty. The poverty is a big push factor, as no one wants to be poor and to be barely able to survive, but instead everyone wants decent and better life standard. Considering the amount of poor people in the world, it is no wonder that this push factor is resulting in large scale migration from the poor nations around the world, toward the more developed nations, so that the people can escape the poverty and have much better living conditions.
Poverty is an example of a push factor. Political disturbance, prejudice, repression, a lack of educational opportunities, and restrictions on religion are other push factors that may exist. The correct option is C.
Push factors are situations or events that tempt or drive people to migrate from their current place or nation to another. People frequently try to escape unfavorable or undesirable circumstances.
Because it can result in financial troubles, limited possibilities, and a lack of resources, poverty is a typical push factor that causes people to look for better economic circumstances or livelihoods in other locations.
Thus, the ideal selection is option C,
Learn more about Push Factor here:
https://brainly.com/question/18831390
#SPJ6
How were members of Coxey’s Army received when they arrived in Washington?
They were given an audience with the president.
They were given an audience with members of Congress.
They were ignored.
They were arrested.
When Coxey's Army arrived in Washington, they were generally ignored but given the opportunity to meet with members of Congress. Some members of the army were arrested.
Explanation:When Coxey's Army arrived in Washington, they were generally received with a mixture of attention and hostility. While they were not granted an audience with the president, they were given the opportunity to meet with members of Congress. However, their demands for government intervention to address unemployment were largely ignored, and some members of Coxey's Army were arrested for trespassing on the Capitol grounds.
Learn more about Coxey's Army here:https://brainly.com/question/32035810
#SPJ11
When members of Coxey's Army arrived in Washington, they were ignored and leaders, including Jacob Coxey, were arrested for trespassing.
Despite their peaceful march and the reason behind their protest, they were not received well. Upon their arrival, they were largely ignored, and the situation escalated when Jacob Coxey and other leaders were arrested for trespassing on the grass outside the U.S. Capitol.
Choose all that apply.
What were three typical reasons for a person to become a slave?
criminal acts
to pay off debts
didn't know right people
too poor to work
prisoner of war
Answer:
Criminal acts:
Those who have broken the law, but are not worthy of death, usually served prison time or menial labor until their sentence is served.
To pay off debts:
Those who have large amounts of debt but had no money to pay generally were able to pay off their debt through working for their debtor.
Prisoner of war:
Prisoners were a large source of potential slaves who can be used to help construct infrastructure within a nation. Examples can be found in Rome subduing many of the Barbaric tribes in the North.
~
Why did Puritans feel a lack of guilt for their harsh punishments for broken rules?
Answer:
Puritans felt a lack of guilt for their harsh punishments for broken rules because of they followed "Old Testament teachings" (A).
Explanation:
The punishment imposed by the puritans is found in the bible's old testament. This was before the coming of Jesus Christ. It is due to this that the puritans developed justification for their unworthy actions that they did in the past. The puritans had different religious groups who had created a theology of the common criticism. The puritans also wanted to purge all churches of the Roman Catholic’s ruling hierarchies of cardinals and bishops. They, therefore, conducted ceremonies that involved the clergy with repeated prayers and liturgy.
Explain the argument that led to the three-fifths rule and the consequences of that rule.
The three-fifths rule was a rule that was created to solve the problem of representation in the US Congress. With this rule, slaves were considered 3/5 of a person for purposes of representation and direct taxation.
The main arguments that led to this rule was that Southern slaveholders wanted slaves to count for the purposes of representation, because then the Southern states would be considered more populated and it would cause a bigger representation of their interests in Congress. But Northern states feared that this would give southerners too much power.
The main consequence of that rule was that with it Southern States held the balance of political power.
What was the Iran-Contra affair about?
Answer:
Explanation:
sale of arms & missiles for hostages and also sent money from the sale to Nicaragua.
Which of the following was not a result of Dunmore’s Proclamation?
Slaves joined Dunmore to fight for the British.
A majority of slaves in the colonies won their freedom.
Patriot forces increased their commitment to independence.
Both slaveholding and non-slaveholding whites feared a slave rebellion.
The correct answer is B. A majority of slaves in the colonies won their freedom.
Explanation:
The Dunmore's Proclamation was a document signed in 1775 in the Colony of Virginia that aimed at encouraging the population, including slaves to support the Loyalist cause to avoid the independence of the colonies with the promise of providing former slaves freedom. Because of this, as a result of this document around 80,000 slaves escape and help the loyalist, while the Patriots and also slaves and non-slaveholding white population reacted by increasing their forces and creating mechanisms to stop slaves that could scape as they fear a rebellion. However, this document did not provide most of the slaves with freedom as most of the slaves that had escaped had to return with their masters and only around 300 were freed. Therefore, the one that was not a result of Dunmore's Proclamation is "a majority of slaves in the colonies won their freedom" because only a small percentage were freed while most slaves continue with their masters or returned after scaping.
Dunmore's Proclamation did not result in the majority of slaves winning their freedom, which is option B. Instead, it led to increased Patriot commitment to independence and fears of a slave rebellion, while only a small number of slaves joined the British forces.
Explanation:The result of Dunmore's Proclamation that was not true is "B. A majority of enslaved people in the colonies won their freedom." While Lord Dunmore's Proclamation did lead to some slaves joining the British forces, it did not result in a majority of slaves in the colonies winning their freedom. In fact, only about 300 enslaved individuals were able to join Dunmore's forces. The proclamation did, however, intensify the commitment of Patriot forces to independence and raised fears among both slaveholding and non-slaveholding whites of a potential slave rebellion. Consequently, the proclamation had the unintended effect of solidifying support for the Patriot cause and emphasizing the contradictions inherent in a fight for liberty while maintaining the institution of slavery.
Historians consider the Agricultural Revolution and the development of civilization as among the most transformative developments in human history. (1) How did settled agriculture change patterns of life? (2) How did the lives of ancient peoples living in pre-“civilizational” communities differ from those living within “civilization”? (3) What advantages and possible disadvantages did the Agricultural Revolution and civilization bring to human life?
1. The settled agriculture changed the life-style of the humans totally. From being nomadic hunter-gatherers only concerned about surviving, the humans now were able to sustain themselves in one place without any big concerns. The production of food was so high that there was surplus, eliminating the main concern about survival. This gave the humans much more spare time, and that spare time led to the development of astronomy, philosophy, sciences, architecture, which quickly was transforming the human societies.
2. The humans that lived in pre-civilized societies had totally different life-style than the ones that were civilized. The civilized humans had settled life, and they had secured the problem with the food, having spare time to focus and develop other things. The pre-civilized humans had only two main concerns and objectives in their lives, getting enough food and safety. This was due tot heir hunter-gatherer life-style, which basically meant that they directly depended on nature for their food sources, so they had to move constantly in an attempt to find enough to survive. Also, that was constantly putting them in dangerous situations, as lot of the animals that were hunted were very dangerous, and on top of that, there were predators luring everywhere.
3. The advantages of the Agricultural Revolution were countless for the humans. The Agricultural Revolution enabled them to have lot of spare time. In this spare time, the humans started to use their brain-power for other things, such as science, astronomy, architecture, development of politics, philosophy etc. That resulted in a very rapid and constant technological development, which in turn was constantly improving the lives of the humans. A disadvantage of the Agricultural Revolution for the humans can be seen that they became more and more isolated from the nature, as well as the much lesser knowledge of the space as the movement was in much lesser extent for several thousands years, thus the humans were usually aware of only the things surrounding them.
Which of the following was not a key area of focus for the Progressives?
land reform
democracy
business regulation
social justice
Answer:
The best answer from the choices given, to the question: Which of the following was not a key area of focus for the Progressives, would be: Land reform.
Explanation:
Progressivism was characterized for being a movement that appeared between the 1890´s and the 1920´s and it sought to fight off the negative effects of industrialization, urbanization, immigration and corruption. Their focus, more than anything, was to bring a much fairer system, to focus on those issues that socially were affecting Americans, more than anything else. As such, the one issue on which they did not focus, at all, was land reform. They were concerned with regulation of monopolies, justice, the establishment of a more direct democracy, and the institution of social justice, but not land reform.
The Progressives did not prioritize democracy; their key areas of focus were land reform, business regulation, and social justice.
Democracy was not a key area of focus for the Progressives.
The Progressives focused on land reform, business regulation, and social justice as key areas of their movement. They aimed to address issues like trusts and monopolies, consumer safety, labor abuses, and preservation of lands.
In their pursuit of social justice, they worked to help various marginalized groups and advocated for reform through grassroots efforts and legislative changes.
What factors led to the Great Recession?
Answer:
In short, the factor that caused the great recession was overproduction, which was not prepared for the lack of demand, and ended up with all the goods stopped without any consumer buying them.
Explanation:
When the First World War came to an end, some European countries were weakening their economies, while the United States grew more and more, profiting from the export of food and industrialized products.
As a result, North American production became accustomed to this growth, which increased day by day, especially between the years 1918 and 1928. It was a scenario with many jobs, low prices, high production in agriculture and the expansion of credit that encouraged unbridled consumerism.
The problem for the United States was that Europe began to reestablish itself, which led to less and less import from the United States.
Now the American industry could no longer sell the exaggerated quantity of goods, with more supply of products than demand. This has led to a fall in prices, a fall in production, and consequently an increase in unemployment. These factors led to a fall in profits and a halt in trade, leading to a stock market crash and causing the great recession.
Final answer:
The Great Recession was primarily caused by the collapse of the housing bubble and a global financial crisis, rooted in the failure of risky, unregulated financial assets like CMOs and CDSs, which led to high unemployment and a sharp GDP decline.
Explanation:
The factors that led to the Great Recession were multi-faceted, but central to the downturn were the housing bubble and a severe crisis in the financial markets. Predatory lending practices contributed to a housing bubble which, when burst, led to plummeting home values and foreclosures, causing widespread financial distress. Moreover, the proliferation of complex and unregulated financial instruments such as collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) and credit default swaps (CDSs) compounded the crisis. These instruments, often rated as safe by credit rating agencies, failed en masse and fueled a global financial meltdown. The situation was exacerbated as access to credit dried up, leading to a decline in consumer spending, slowdown in international trade, and massive job losses, with unemployment rates soaring over 10% and a sharp decline in GDP.
In response to the recession, the United States government implemented aggressive fiscal and monetary policies to stabilize the financial markets and promote economic recovery. These actions have helped the country make significant strides towards rebuilding economic stability, though the ripple effects of the recession were felt globally.
How successful has the United States been in achieving its goals in Iraq and Afghanistan?
Answer:
failed to reach the promises and turned to be costly, failed to estabilize the region
Explanation:
Although the United States has military supremacy, the latest armed conflicts with the nations of Iraq and Afghanistan have led to most of its own citizens to question and turn against the American government.
The wars do not longer represent the interests of the people, neither they seek to guarantee the national interest. Rather, the wars have turned to be driven by geopolitical considerations like ensuring energy supplies in countries rich in oil. Justifications for invading or pursuing the speech of protecting human rights is no longer an argument in the international community. Therefore the image of the United States has been severely damaged and the wars have caused failed states that are unstabilizing the region. Many radical groups like ISIS have spread in the region for further breach and clash with the American decadent hegemony in the world.
citing specific positive (at least three) and negative (at least two) examples, how would you assess the contributions/legacy of the ancient Greeks? Where should they be admired and where not? Where do you see Greek influence or reflection in our own day? (Possible categories for analysis might include politics and government, gender roles, social structure, philosophy, science/math, art and architecture, and literature (inc. history writing and theater).
Answer:
Positive Examples: Democracy and open deliberation of public issues. b) Math, algebra and geometry. c) Music and literature.
Negative: Gender structure and Slavery
Explanation: Ancient greeks are credited with the invention of democracy. This is a stretch, since our representative democracies has little to d with Athens' direct democray, where all male citizens were allowed an opinion in the matters of the city and where public deliberation was a key issue.
Maths and Geometry were an integral part of Greek society, they developed fundamental concepts of geometry like the Pitagorian Theorem. It is likely that they took some of those concepts from other civilizations, like ancient Egypt, but nonetheless, their contrubutions to the field were important.
With that eye geometry and math, one can consider their influence in creating the musical notes and scales that would go on to evolve in our modern western music. The styles of literature they created, are also the pillar of western Literature.
On the other hand, Ancient Greece was a patriarchal society and women had a very limited role. They were nor allowed to participate in the political life of the city. There were also slaves and many other dwellers that were considered as second class people in the city.
Which of the following was not included in the Treaty of Versailles?
extensive German reparations to be paid to the Allies
a curtailment of German immigration to Allied nations
France’s acquisition of disputed territory along the French-German border
a mandate for Germany to accept responsibility for the war publicly
The correct answer is: "a curtailment of German immigration to Allied nations"
The Treaty of Versailles was signed in 1919 after WWI, by the victorious allied powers and Germany. Germany was considered guilty for all the losses beared due to the conflict and was oblied, through this treaty, to pay economic reparations to some of the victorious Entente powers.
Germany was also forced to delimitarize and to keep its armed forces and weapon production at a minimum, to guarantee that they were uncapable of undertaking an offensive action again. Moreover, Germany was forced to give France some territories that both nations had been disputing for decades.
These requirements severely damaged the German economy. Germany could not afford the huge reparations payments and printed money to be able to pay them, causing a big recession and an hyperinflation crisis. This emergency situation ended up giving popular support to right-wing extremist parties, such as the nazi party leaded by Hitler, who promised to restore German pride and to recover the stolen territories and wealth.
Answer:
i think it is a curtailment of German immigration to Allied nation.
Explanation: