Which person or group was most responsible for the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment?

President Johnson
northern voters
southern voters
Radical Republicans in Congress

Answer:

Quarantine.

Explanation:

Mr. President John F. Kennedy in his speech october 22, 1962 announced quarantine against cuba island.

In this  speech Mr. President said  textually: "I have directed the the following initial steps be taken immediately".

First: To halt this offensive build up, a strict quarantine on all offensive military equipment under shipment to cuba is being initiated.  

The New Deal was a series of measures and projects enacted during the Great Depression (The worst economic downturn of America) that aimed to restore public confidence in the banking system, to provide relief to those most in need (like the elderly and the poor), to employ millions of Americans, to reform infrastructure, to regulate the economy and others.

The New Deal both provided direct relief and created new jobs through the establishment of government agencies, some of them were: 1) the Civilian Conservation Corps (1933) that gave millions of young men employment on environmental projects that, among others, included the plantation of trees and construction of trails and shelters for those homeless; 2) the Works Progress Administration (1935) that employed mostly unskilled men to carry out public works projects, such as the construction of public buildings and roads that benefited the whole society; 3) and the Tennessee Valley Authority (1933) that provided jobs to people and brought electricity to the rural Tennessee River Valley, operated the hydroelectric Wilson Dam, improved the navigability of the Tennessee River and developed the agriculture, commerce and industry in the region.

The New Deal, led by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, provided direct relief through federally funded initiatives like the Wagner-Peyser Act and the Federal Emergency Relief Act while creating jobs using programs such as the Civil Works Administration and the Public Works Administration. It offered hope during the Great Depression, but it also faced legal challenges, as seen with the National Recovery Administration.

The New Deal was a comprehensive series of federal initiatives enacted under President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) with the aim of providing direct relief to Americans suffering during the Great Depression, as well as creating jobs to reboot the economy. Two central pieces of legislation that illustrate these efforts were the Wagner-Peyser Act and the Federal Emergency Relief Act (FERA). The Wagner-Peyser Act established the United States Employment Service, which encouraged states to create job opportunities with the promise of federal matching funds. Likewise, through FERA, $500 million in direct grants was distributed to states to support relief agencies, significantly aiding the nearly fifteen million unemployed.

Programs for Direct Relief and Job Creation

Additional New Deal programs included initiatives aimed at constructing public buildings, developing national parks, creating artworks, and stabilizing agricultural prices. The Civil Works Administration (CWA) and the Public Works Administration (PWA) were directly focused on job creation through public works projects. The Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) aimed to provide relief to farmers and regulate crop production to bolster prices. All these programs intended to restore hope and stability to the American workforce and economy.

Challenges of the New Deal

Although the New Deal facilitated job creation and infused optimism into the public psyche, inherent societal inequities remained unaddressed. The National Recovery Administration (NRA) was one such program established to protect workers by advocating for fair wages and hours, but it faced legal challenges and was ultimately declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. Despite the hurdles, the New Deal's legacy persists, with several of its initiatives continuing to impact the nation.

https://brainly.com/question/36357392

#SPJ3

Answer:

By each state at special ratifying conventions.

Explanation:

The process of constitution ratified started in Philadelphia  1787 and finished in  New Hampshire 1788 .

During 3 months of convention five states ratified the new project of constitution but Massachusett was opposed to the document.

At last in 1788 was a agreed with Massachusetts and others states. The constitution was ratified in Massachusetts.

Answer:

Article VII stipulated that nine states had to ratify the Constitution for it to go into effect. Beyond the legal requirements for ratification, the state conventions fulfilled other purposes. The Constitution had been produced in strictest secrecy during the Philadelphia convention.

Explanation:

Answer: rising tension between governments/powers and unequal treaties

Answer:

Oliver Cromwell took control of England's government and placed himself as Lord Protector of England after the monarchy was abolished. However, citizens were frustrated by continuing instability in England. Many citizens also disliked Cromwell's Puritan ideas. Even though Cromwell had the support of the military, his son could not gain the people's favor after Cromwell died. England restored the monarchy and offered the throne to Charles II.

Explanation:

The English citizens restored the monarchy after Oliver Cromwell's rule due to his increasing autocracy and violation of English liberties. The restoration of the monarchy with Charles II's ascension provided a sense of political stability. Additionally, Charles II's efforts strengthening England's global power and economy also contributed to the support for monarchy.

England's citizens restored the monarchy in 1660 after the rule of Oliver Cromwell due to a number of factors. Cromwell, despite offering a seemingly better mode of governance initially, assumed broad powers and disregarded cherished English liberties under the Magna Carta, causing widespread discontent.

During Cromwell's rule, charging Charles I with treason and beheading him, the monarchy dissolved and England transformed into a republic. Cromwell headed the new English Commonwealth, marking a time known as the English interregnum or the time between kings. However, his rule became increasingly autocratic over time and many felt that their liberties were being compromised.

Moreover, when Charles II ascended the throne in 1660, there was widespread celebration among the English who recognized the value of having a king. Charles II took immediate steps to strengthen England's global power and established many overseas colonies, thus boosting England's economy. Thus, the restoration of monarchy was welcomed both for political and economic reasons.

https://brainly.com/question/14645384

#SPJ3

Jay's Treaty aimed at resolving issues after the American Revolution, facilitating trade and diplomatic relations between U.S. and Britain, while the Neutrality Acts were designed to prevent the U.S. involvement in global conflicts by imposing limitations on trade and travel.

The Neutrality Act and Jay's Treaty both held notable purposes related to the relationship between the United States and Great Britain. Jay's Treaty, negotiated in 1794 by Supreme Court Justice John Jay, aimed to resolve issues lingering after the American Revolution. While not all issues were addressed - impressment of American sailors by the British navy remained a significant problem - the treaty did facilitate trade, with Britain agreeing to abandon frontier posts and permit American ships to engage in trade in the West Indies.

The Neutrality Acts were enacted by the U.S. Congress in the 1930s with the main goal of preventing America's involvement in another global war after World War I. The Acts aimed to isolate the U.S. from international conflicts by imposing strict regulations on trade and loans to belligerent countries, and by restricting travel of American citizens to warring nations. These legislations represented a significant attempt to maintain peace and safeguard American interests during a period of global instability.

https://brainly.com/question/351223

#SPJ12

Final answer:

Abel exhibits flexible intercultural communication by adapting to the nonverbal greeting ritual of bowing, showing a high degree of intercultural communication competence.

Explanation:

We should congratulate Abel for doing a good job at the criterion of flexible intercultural communication when he adapts to the study-abroad student's cultural practice of bowing instead of shaking hands. In engaging in a nonverbal greeting ritual more common in Asian cultures, Abel displays a high degree of intercultural communication competence (ICC), which is necessary for effective cross-cultural interactions. By choosing to bow, Abel honors the behaviors of a noncontact culture, like Japan, and shows respect for the other's cultural norms and social etiquette regarding status and greeting rituals. This ability to adapt behavior in a manner consistent with cultural understanding is crucial in our globalized world and is characteristic of someone with high ICC.

By the 1750's Great Britain had long established successful colonies in North America. A whole new generation was born in North American colonies as 'colonists' who understood that they belonged to Great Britain through lineage.

The language they spoke, the products they imported and most trade was conducted with Great Britain. Every year, government officials would visit the colonies and news and print were centric to Great Britain and it's 13 colonies.

However, the colonists also paid taxes to London. This seemed acceptable to earlier generations who had actually immigrated to the New World and still had connections with Great Britain. However, for the new generation of colonists, all they knew was their colonies and they did not have any particular affiliation with Great Britain.

As the colonies were so far away, they had started to build their own distinct identity. Their accent, way of life, music and their own folk stories were started to differ from those of Great Britain.

Things came to a difficult point when Great Britain would levy taxes on them. Since the colonies were directly controlled by the Crown and had no representation in London, this was seen as unfair.

Answer:

The answer to the question: What was the role of the Taft Commission, would be: to legislate for the then known Philippine Islands, that were under the control of the United States, during the Philippine-American war.

Explanation:

The Second Commission, also known as the Taft Commission after its first leader, William Howard Taft, was in function in the Philippiness, then known only as the Philippine Islands, under control of the United States, as the sole legislative body, responsible for the establishment of all the laws in the region, from 1900, when it was set up by President William McKinley, till 1916, when it was replaced. This Comission also received some executive powers, but mostly its role was legislative and it fell under its jurisdiction to also establish the Supreme Court and the whole judicial system, and law codes for the Philippiness.

The Taft Commission, led by William Howard Taft, worked to implement vital reforms in the Philippines while managing international issues such as Central American debts and Asian power dynamics. Taft's measures were critical in modernizing local governance, maintaining regional power balances, and avoiding potential European military interventions.

The Taft Commission, named after William Howard Taft who later became the U.S. President but at the time was serving as the governor of the Philippines following the Spanish-American War, played a crucial role in introducing and managing reforms in the Philippines. Predominantly, these reforms sought to modernize and advance day-to-day life, often through legislative changes which redefined local government structures. Significantly, to gain the backing of opposition leaders, the Taft Commission offered them political appointments, which helped in smoothening the reform process.

Furthermore, Taft's policies not only reflected domestically but also had international implications. For instance, to prevent potential European military interference in the Western Hemisphere, Taft swiftly repaid several Central American nations' debts to European countries, replacing them with U.S. loans. This approach sometimes required military intervention when a country resisted American financial control, as seen in Nicaragua's case.

In Asia, Taft sought to reinforce China's ability to withstand Japanese interference, thereby hoping to maintain a balance of power in the region. However, he was met with resistance when attempting to expand the Open Door policy, exposing the limitations of U.S. influence and foreign policy knowledge. This led to the restructuring of the U.S. State Department to better navigate foreign relations complexities.

https://brainly.com/question/12879320

#SPJ3

Answer:

The Stono Rebellion

Explanation:

The Stono Rebellion was a rebellion that happened near the Stono River in South Carolina and it was the largest slave revolt in colonial America. Many slaves raided a firearms shop and killed more than 20 white people as they went south. The group of slaves had about 60 members.

After the Rebellion, white colonists passed the Negro Act of 1740 that made illegal for enslaves Africans to move abroad, assemble in groups, raise food, earn money and learn to write.

Final answer:

The Negro Act of 1740 was a reaction to the Stono Rebellion, an uprising of enslaved people in South Carolina, and was meant to prevent further such events by restricting the rights and mobility of slaves.

Explanation:

The Negro Act of 1740 was a reaction to the Stono Rebellion. This legislative act was passed in the wake of the Stono Rebellion of 1739 to impose new limitations on enslaved people in South Carolina. It prohibited them from assembling, growing their own food, learning to write, and traveling freely, demonstrating the colonial authorities' attempt to tighten control and reduce the possibility of another uprising.

The Negro Act of 1740, formally known as An Act for the Better Ordering and Governing of Negroes and Other Slaves in the Province, thus evidences the repressive measures put in place following acts of resistance by enslaved people.

Answer:

Atheism

Explanation:

The Enlightenment, also known as the century of lights and illustration, was an intellectual and philosophical movement that dominated the world of ideas in Europe during the eighteenth century, "The Century of Philosophy."

Many people think that the thinkers of this movement were atheists, but this was rarely the case. Generally, Enlightenment had, within its thinkers, a mix of Christianity and Scientific rationalism in such a way that we have some specific movements with that sort of thinking, such as the Deist movement of the 18th century.

Final answer:

Atheism is not a tenet of the Enlightenment; rather, the period focused on reason, empiricism, progressivism, and cosmopolitanism, often using reason to understand religious concepts.

Explanation:

The Enlightenment was a period in history characterized by an emphasis on reason, empiricism, progressivism, and cosmopolitanism, among other ideas. The tenet among the options provided that is not a part of the Enlightenment is atheism. While the Enlightenment did challenge the traditional authority of the church and religious dogma, favoring scientific and empirical methods of understanding the world, it did not inherently advocate atheism. Instead, many Enlightenment thinkers sought to understand religion and the idea of God through reason and evidence rather than through blind faith or revelation.

Freemasons were the members of the secret fraternal order of Free and Accepted Masons that is a worldwide secret society.

Many of the founding fathers were freemasons, like George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, Paul Revere, John Hancock, John Marshall. So nine of the 56 men that signed the Declaration of Independence were Masons and 13 of the 39 that signed the US Constitution were also masons.

Answer:

  The Bonus Expeditionary Force.

Explanation:

 They were a group of 43,000 marchers, some of them veterans of World War I who gathered in Washington D.C. in 1932 to demand the payment of their service certificates.

  The name was given by the organizers as a reference to the American Expeditionary Forces. The media called them Bonus Marchers. The manifestation was supposed to be in peace, but when the Washington police attempt to remove the veterans after being ordered to do that by the Attorney General they resist. That lead to Hoover´s decision of sending the army to clear the marchers' campsite. It was considered politically disastrous to Hoover and was a contributing factor to the victory of Roosevelt in the 1932 election.

  I hope this answer helps you.

The establishment clause would prevent the mayor’s office from displaying a cross.

The correct answer is B) the mayor’s office from displaying a cross.

The Establishment clause would prevent the mayor’s office from displaying a cross.

Religion is a delicate issue in the United States, and although every citizen is free to practice its own religious thoughts, religion in government has restrictions. We are referring to the First Amendment's Establishment Clause that does not allow the government to support any law to establish a preferent religion over the other. This clause also prohibits any action on the part of the government to favor the practice of a specific type of religion. That is why the Mayor's office cannot display a cross

Answer:

The answer to the question is: that a "pure democracy", better known today as direct democracy, is where the people of the nation have direct control over the process of law and decision-making, without having representatives who do that for them. As such, government, and all the passing of laws, depends on the direct power of the people, and not through intermediaries.

However, the United States founding fathers, including Alexander Hamilton, did not believe that the essence and nature of the United States would justify the use of this type of democracy, so they chose instead for another form called representative democracy. These two forms clash in that in one the people have the power to enact laws, and diectly choose how, and who, rules them, while in the other, it depends on representatives that are chosen by election by the people.

Although the world today does not have many countries who use the direct democracy system, or pure democracy, there are many that use a system called semi-direct democracy. Which means, the people still have the power to establish how they will be ruled and by whom, and have the power of referedum to support, or abolish, rules passed by law-making and ruling institutions, but they still use representatives.

In the context of the New York ratifying convention, Alexander Hamilton and Melancton Smith discussed the concept of a 'pure democracy.' Hamilton disagreed with Smith's assertion that pure democracy would be the most perfect government. The modern United States represents a representative democracy, where citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf.

In the context of the New York ratifying convention, Alexander Hamilton and Melancton Smith were discussing the concept of a 'pure democracy.' In this context, a pure democracy refers to a system of government where the majority of citizens have the power to make decisions that are binding upon the whole. Hamilton disagreed with Smith's assertion that pure democracy would be the most perfect government because he believed it could lead to instability and the violation of minority rights.

Comparing this to the type of democracy that represents the modern United States, it is important to note that the modern United States is a representative democracy. In a representative democracy, the citizens elect representatives who make decisions and pass laws on their behalf. This system is designed to protect minority rights and ensure a more stable and efficient decision-making process.

https://brainly.com/question/4061732

#SPJ12

Answer:

The primary complaint of the rebels in the Whiskey Rebellion was the tax on whiskey and rum.

Explanation:

The Whiskey Rebellion was a popular uprising that began in 1791 and culminated in 1794 in Washington, DC, in the Monongahela Valley.

The rebellion began soon after the Articles of Confederation were replaced by the Constitution of 1789, which established a stronger executive power. It had its origin from the budget deficit caused by the American War of Independence, which led Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton to find new expedients: he persuaded Congress to raise taxes on spirits and alcoholic beverages such as whiskey.

The western counties of the United States then began harassing the tax collectors. The Whiskey Boys organized violent protests in Maryland, Virginia, Carolina, and Georgia. In 1794, this agitation turned into an armed revolt.

US President George Washington decreed martial law and led an army against the rebels in October 1794, that crushed the revolt. He wanted to make Pennsylvania a breeding ground for federal power, with William Rawle as Pennsylvania District Attorney for the United States.

The primary compliant of the rebels in the Whiskey Rebellion was against the federal tax on whiskey and rum. This tax was considered by the rural farmers, who were primary producers of these spirits, as unfair and burdensome.

The primary complaint of the rebels in the Whiskey Rebellion was the tax on whiskey and rum. This uprising started in 1791 when the federal government imposed a tax on all distilled spirits, which decidedly affected the rural farmers who were the primary producers of these beverages. These farmers believed this tax was highly unfair and burdensome, sparking the rebellion which took place in the western part of Pennsylvania.

https://brainly.com/question/478473

#SPJ3

Answer:    Northern Europe

Explanation:  The Protestant Reformation was a movement within the Catholic Church primarily led by Martin Luther and then John Calvin. Everything started in Germany in 16th century, when Martin Luther raised the issue of forgiving sins by the Church with monetary compensation and many other irregularities and deviations from the original teachings. His intention is to reform within the Church itself in the form of 95 theses, but he was therefore thrown out, and thus a movement was created with the goal of a major religious, political and social change under the guidance of Martin Luther, called Protestantism or Lutheranism. This is considered one of the great revolutions within the Church or the religious revolution. Later, this movement expanded widely in Northern Europe.

Final answer:

The Protestant Reformation began in Northern Europe in the early 16th century, originating from Martin Luther's criticisms of the Roman Catholic Church.

Explanation:

The Protestant Reformation began in the early 16th century primarily in Northern Europe. It originated from criticisms made by Martin Luther, a German theologian, against the Roman Catholic Church. Luther's publication of the Ninety-Five Theses in 1517 marked the beginning of the Reformation. He protested against what he perceived as corruption and the sale of indulgences within the church.

Luther's ideas quickly gained traction and led to his excommunication, but they also inspired others across Europe, such as Ulrich Zwingli and John Calvin in Switzerland. The movement led to the creation of many new branches of Christianity outside of Roman Catholicism, forming the basis for numerous Protestant denominations like Baptists, Lutherans, and Calvinists.

Answer:

Thomas Jefferson's ideas on race and slavery were not totally honest. On one side he considered that “all men are created equal,” but on the other, he turned more than 600 people into slaves during his lifetime.  Despite making some legislative efforts to counter slavery and oftenly lamenting its existence, he also earned money straight from the institution of slavery and, in his notes on the State of Virginia, he declared that he had a suspicion of white people being superior than black people. For Jefferson, white Americans and slaves conformed two "separate nations" unable to coexist pacifically in the same country.

Thomas Jefferson had conflicted views on race and slavery, believing in liberty yet owning slaves and considering Black people inferior. He supported gradual emancipation but feared the consequences of immediate abolition, leading to very few of his slaves being freed.

Thomas Jefferson's ideas on race and slavery were paradoxical and complex. Although he was a proponent of liberty and the principal author of the Declaration of Independence, he also enslaved over a hundred people at his Monticello plantation and believed Black people were inferior to Whites. Jefferson's writings, particularly in Notes on the State of Virginia, reveal his vision for ending slavery through gradual emancipation and his racially charged views suggesting that Black people were unfit as citizens and should be removed from the state to avoid future conflict. Despite these views, he foresaw the eventual demise of slavery and in his Draft Constitution for Virginia, he called for its end and granted specific rights for native peoples, among other progressive notions. However, Jefferson struggled with the practical implications of abolition and feared a violent racial upheaval which, coupled with his financial dependence on slavery, resulted in freeing only a handful of his slaves over his lifetime.

Answer:

The power to create land ordinances

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation were the first US Constitution. The article created a loose confederation of sovereign states with a weak central government. Because of that, the Congress did not have much power, because most of the power was left with the state governments.

One of the powers that Congress had was the power to create land ordinances. An example is the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 that was the single most important piece of legislation in that period.

The Minoan civilization is the first civilization in Europe, and it is deeply admired and lot of people are fascinated by it, as it was a very advanced civilization for its time. The decline of it is not clear yet, and there are multiple theories about it. Some of the theories include strong volcanic eruption, strong earthquake, a tsunami, and invasion.

As a most plausible reason for the decline of the Minoans I would consider a mixture of a strong earthquake and invasion. The Minoans lived at a place which is geologically very active, so the earthquakes are common occurrence. A strong earthquake is very possible to have happened, and considering the period of time, it would have been devastating for this civilization, as the towns would have been destroyed totally, lot of people would have ended up inured and dead. The economy and military strength would crumble because of such an event, so an outside invasion would have been very easy. The weaken Minoans would not have been able to defend themselves, so it would have been an easy and attractive place for invasion.

The Whigs was formed in 1830s and they opposed the tyrannical rule of Andrew Jackson, because they named themselves the 18th century British-American Whigs that opposed King George.

They believed in an active federal government that was committed to internal improvements, including the establishment of a national bank.

Final answer:

The philosophies and policies of the new Whig Party centered around economic growth and a strong role for the federal government. They supported government-sponsored projects and appealed to reform movements. However, the party struggled to bring a cohesive message and fragmented into factions.

Explanation:

The philosophies and policies of the new Whig Party were centered around economic growth and a strong role for the federal government. The Whigs believed in government-sponsored projects to promote economic growth and viewed the federal government as an engine for progress. They also supported Protestant culture and appealed to a variety of reform movements like temperance and nativism.

However, the Whigs struggled to bring a cohesive message to voters and broke into multiple factions by 1853. These factions ranged from those who wanted to create a new antislavery party to those who wanted to create a new union party. Ultimately, the Whigs were unable to find a unifying issue and were overshadowed by the Democrats.

A striking tool is a basic hand tool with a weighted head attached to handle.

Answer:

A.a single-piece of high-carbon steel. B.a weighted head attached to handle. C.a handle made of wood or fiberglass.

Explanation:

Many historians refer to the election of Thomas Jefferson in 1800s as “The Revolution of 1800” because it was the first time that power in America changed from one party to another.

This marked US politics as a two-party system, despite the fact that many of them believed that the appearance of parties could do more harm than good. Because of those critics, Jefferson promised to govern as the Founders intended.

Answer:

The two parties from the First Party System in the United States emerged from the support of two different groups of people with different interests. They chose their names based on their values, being The Federalists strong defenders of the Constitution, order, and the federal administration, and the Democratic-Republicans a group which was completely decided to bring the Revolution to common people.

The Federalists were mainly supported by leaders of the mercantile economy such as traders, artisans and creditors (they were wealthier), and the Democratic-Republicans found their support in diverse sections of American society, such as popular farmers of the German, Scotish and Irish groups.

Finally, they found themselves in agreement regarding slavery, since even though they had different points of view, neither of them fully supported it.

The first party system in the United States of America came to be developed as the Democrats and Republicans as they were offshoots of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists.

As a result of this, they were classified as either progressives or conservatives with each party having different ideologies and beliefs about what they wanted from their country.

Some of the beliefs of the Democrats include:

Some of the beliefs of the Republicans include:

Read more here:

https://brainly.com/question/16403181

Answer:

the ability to fight defensively, rather than offensively

Explanation:

Union Army generals reexamined the offensive battle tactics developed during the Mexican-American War, with the goal of updating these tactics during the secession war. In this way, the Union had one more advantage in the conflict, since the army of the Confederates was flawed in defensive tactics. The Union Army had a greater number of soldiers, a substantial industry, an extensive railroad, and the ability to fight offensively.

Answer:

It increased their monetary power

Explanation:

Industrialization made fabricated products progressively plentiful and broadly accessible. Everything except the least fortunate Americans had the option to upgrade their homes with parlor stoves, upholstered furniture, adornments, and cookstoves. Indeed, even already costly products, for example, clocks, were at a reasonable price after the industrialization.

The answer is C, James Tallmadge.

Final answer:

The proposal to prohibit the importation of slaves to Missouri was made by James Tallmadge, an anti-slavery representative from New York. The Tallmadge Amendment sparked significant debate, leading to the Missouri Compromise of 1820.

Explanation:

The proposal to prohibit the importation of slaves to Missouri upon its admission to the United States was made by James Tallmadge, an anti-slavery representative from New York. In 1819, as part of the debate over Missouri's entrance to the Union as a potential slave state, Tallmadge introduced a measure that sought not just to stop further importation of slaves into Missouri but also to gradually emancipate the slaves already there. This proposal, known as the Tallmadge Amendment, was a point of contention as it shifted the conversation around Missouri's statehood to focus on the morality and future of slavery in new states.

The House of Representatives supported statehood for Missouri only if the amendment was included, whereas the Senate was willing to allow Missouri as a slave state without such a condition. This polarization led to a stalemate between the two chambers of Congress. Eventually, a compromise known as the Missouri Compromise of 1820, led by Henry Clay, was reached, allowing Missouri to enter as a slave state and Maine as a free state, maintaining the Senate balance.

Answer:

In the nineteenth century, the doctrine of Manifest Destiny was a common belief among the inhabitants of the United States that American colonizers should expand in North America, from the Atlantic to the Pacific. It expressed the belief that the American people were elected by God to civilize their continent.

The Manifest Destiny was not a thesis embraced by all American society. The differences within the country itself about the objective and consequences of the policy of expansion determined its acceptance or resistance.

The northeastern states believed for the most part that the United States should take its concept of "civilization" throughout the continent through territorial expansion. In addition, for US commercial interests, the expansion offered large and lucrative access to foreign markets and thus allowed to compete in better conditions with the British. Having ports in the Pacific would facilitate trade with Asia.  

The southern states sought to extend slavery. New slave states would strengthen the power of the south in Washington and would also serve to place the growing slave population.

This north-south conflict became clear with the question of Texas's entry into the Union and was one of the main causes of the future Civil War.

There were also political groups that saw the excessive territorial extension as dangerous; they believed that their political system and the formation of a nation would be difficult to apply in such a vast territory. This position was defended as much by some leaders of the Whigs as by some expansionist Republican-Democrats, who argued about how much territory should be acquired.

Another point of discussion was the use of force. Some political leaders (whose maximum exponent was James K. Polk) did not hesitate to try to annex the largest possible territory even at the risk of triggering wars (as in fact happened) with other nations. Others opposed (albeit timidly) the use of force, on the grounds that the benefits of their system alone would suffice for the territories to join voluntarily.

It can be said that the own supporters of the "Manifest Destiny" formed a heterogeneous group with different interests.

The philosophy of Manifest Destiny was a belief that American expansion across North America was preordained and beneficial. It led to westward migration as Americans sought land, resources, and the spread of their ideals. Different groups, including settlers, missionaries, and politicians, variously interpreted and applied this belief to justify expansionist policies and actions.

This idea embodied a belief in American cultural and racial superiority, suggesting that American expansion was inevitable and beneficial for all. This belief was used to justify the annexation of land, often at the expense of Native American tribes and other nations such as Mexico.

Manifest Destiny had a profound effect on Americans' westward migration. It was seen as a call to action that drove settlers to move westward in search of new opportunities, land, and a desire to spread American ideals. The philosophy pushed for territorial expansion and played a significant role in the acquisition of territories, such as through the Oregon Treaty and the Mexican-American War, which resulted in large-scale migration and settlement into new western territories.

The different groups migrating westward applied the philosophy of Manifest Destiny to their individual circumstances in various ways. Settlers seeking economic opportunities believed they were fated to utilize the land's resources, while missionaries saw it as an opportunity to spread their religious beliefs. Some Americans, like Senator Thomas Hart Benton, used Manifest Destiny to argue the moral righteousness of American expansion, while others used it as a pretext for the systemic dispossession and harsh treatment of indigenous peoples and non-American settlers.

The answer is B, to annex new slave states.