Answer:
The correct answer is that the most important for the creation of modern Europe was the French Revolution.
Explanation:
In the 1700s the French revolution happened and it opened the liberal idea progression in the continent.
Answer: the Europe revolution that began Modern Europe was the French revolution
Explanation:
Developments in 19th-century Europe are determined by two great events. The French Revolution broke out in 1789, and its effects reverberated throughout much of Europe for many decades. The effect of this affected created the modern Europe as it is today from the 19th century. The other event was the world war 1, it also affected Europe development and shaped modern Europe.
Consider the titration of 30.0 mL of 0.300 M HClO4 with 0.150 M KOH. Calculate the pH of the resulting solution after the following volumes of KOH have been added. 0.0 mL pH is 15.0 mL pH is 30.0 mL pH is 60.0 mL pH is 80.0 mL pH is_____________.
Answer:
When Vb = 0.0, pH =0.52
When Vb = 15mL, pH =0.82
When Vb = 30mL, pH = 1-12
When Vb = 60mL, pH = 7
When Vb = 80mL, pH = 12.73
Explanation:
Acid (a) = HClO4
Base (b) = KOH
Given Va = 30ml = 0.03L,
Ca = 0.300M
Cb = 0.150
We need to produce PH for the volumes Vb = 0.0ml, 15ml, 30ml, 60ml, 80ml.
The reaction equation is :
HClO4 + KOH ------> KClO4 + H2O
From the reaction, the reacting ratio is 1 :1, meaning the reagents requires equal mole proportionately, the reagent in excess determine the PH
Let n represent mole
n(HClO4) = conc. × vol
= 0.3 × 0.03
= 0.009 mol
So when the vol(b) =0.0 only HClO4 is in solution and Can = 0.3M
pH = -log[H]
pH = - log[0.3]
pH = 0.5229 ~= 0.52...............(*)
When V(b) = 15mL = 0.15
n(KOH) = 0.15 × 0.015
= 0.00225 mol
Hence HClO4 is in excess by =
0.009 - 0.00225 = 0.00675mol
Total vol. solution= 15+30 = 45mL
[H+] = (0.00675/0.045) = 0.15
pH = -log[0.15]
pH ~= 0.82...........(**)
When Vb = 30mL
n(KOH) = conc. × vol
= 0.150 × 0.03
= 0.0045 mole
Excess n(HClO4) = 0.009 - 0.045
= 0.0045 mole
Total vol = 30 +30 =60mL= 0.060L
[H+] = 0.0045/0.060 =0.075
pH = -log[0.075]
pH ~=1.12.................(***)
When Vb = 60 ml =0.60L
n(KOH) = 0.15 × 0.06 = 0.009mol
Now thee are equal mole of HClO4 and KOH in solution, the solution is assume neutral or approximately neutral
pH=7............(****)
When Vb= 80mL = 0.080L
n(KOH) = 0.15 ×0.08 = 0.012
The KOH is in excess by = 0.012 - 0.009= 0.003mol
Vol. of solution = 110mL = 0.110L
[OH-] = 0.003/0.11 = 0.027
pOH = -log[OH] = 1.57
pH = 14 - 1.57 =12.73...........(*****)
According to Paul Schrader, then, films such as Chinatown (1974), Fatal Attraction (1987), and L.A. Confidential (1997) should be classified as ________________.
Answer:
Neo-Noir
Explanation:
According to Paul Schrader, films mentioned in the above questions should be known as Neo-Noir. Neo-Noir is those cinemas whose genre based in noir. Neo-Noir films created with the help of modern technology. Most of the Neo-Noir films are dark, often indicate shadowy and sinister background as a part of crime drama.
Paul Schrader would classify films like Chinatown, Fatal Attraction, and L.A. Confidential as neo-noir, reflecting the style of classical black-and-white cinema with a focus on crime and the use of light and shadow.
According to Paul Schrader, films such as Chinatown (1974), Fatal Attraction (1987), and L.A. Confidential (1997) should be classified as neo-noir films. This style of cinema draws upon the stylized classical black-and-white cinema of the 40s and 50s, known for its narrative focus on crime, and its visual use of shadows and light to depict deceit, secrecy, and lies. Films in this category, such as Roman Polanski's Chinatown, excel in showcasing neo-noir characteristics through their mastery of light and shadows, thus extending the tradition of the original film noir into a contemporary setting.
Which of the following statements accurately contrasts the roles of women
during World War II in the United States and in the Soviet Union?
A. Women in the Soviet Union were prevented from working outside
the home, while women in the United States were expected to
work in factories to fill roles men had left.
B. Women in the Soviet Union helped undermine the German
occupation, while women in the United States took part directly in
combat.
C. Women in the Soviet Union served directly in combat, while
women in the United States served primarily in support positions.
D. Women in the Soviet Union worked on farms and in mines, while
women in the United States worked in shipyards and factories.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. Women in the Soviet Union served directly in combat, while women in the United States served primarily in support positions.
Explanation:
As United States mainland was far away from the both war fronts in the 2nd world war (the pacific front and the European front), a majority of fighting soldiers and officers were men. and since the war was not fought on the mainland of USA, it wasn't necessary to mobilize women much.
However, in USSR, the war spread into the country and Nazi forces came so close to Moscow, moreover, the Soviets were not ready for the war and was taken by surprise. Because of this, most of the women in the front line areas had no other option but to fight!
The correct answer is letter C
World War II was a conflict between men and women. Never before in history have so many women in different countries been called upon to contribute to a war effort as between the years 1939 and 1945. They held positions that were previously considered male, as engineers, production supervisors and truck drivers. , for example, and also enlisted in the armed forces. The massive entry of women into the labor market, either to fill the void left by men who were at the front, or to fill a demand that arose with the outbreak of war, would have a major social impact, during and after the event.
It did not take long for the leaders of the countries involved in the conflict to realize that they would have to call women to war. Initially, they were asked to volunteer, but as the fighting progressed, they started to be recruited. If in World War I they were in factories and were nurses, now they manufactured and even piloted airplanes.
Response briefly explains TWO important ways in which the Second World War transformed United States society.
Final answer:
World War II transformed U.S. society by empowering women to join the workforce, leading to changes in gender roles, and promoting civil rights, by increasing participation of minorities in jobs previously denied to them, setting the stage for the Civil Rights Movement.
Explanation:
The Second World War was a pivotal period that led to significant transformations in United States society. One key way in which this occurred was through the mobilization and empowerment of women. With a large number of men drafted for the war, women were required to enter the workforce en masse, taking on roles traditionally held by men and contributing significantly to the war effort. This shift challenged the prevalent gender roles of the time and laid the groundwork for the women’s liberation movement and a subsequent reevaluation of women's roles in society.
Another major transformation involved the promotion of civil rights. The war highlighted the nation's racial and ethnic divisions, as people of color and women were called upon to work and perform tasks from which they had been previously excluded. This increased participation in the workforce and military service led to a greater demand for equal rights and treatment, setting the stage for the Civil Rights Movement.
When the U.S. colonies gained their independence from England, the _____ was agreed upon as the western boundary of the newly independent country. The land area of the new nation was then doubled shortly afterward with the Louisiana Purchase in 1803.
Answer:
The Mississippi River.
Explanation:
In the Treaty of Paris of 1863, Great Britain recognized the independence of the United States, ending the Revolutionary War. The treaty established the US borders with the British territories, with Britain making generous concesssions. The Western boundary was established along the Mississippi River, which was going to be open to navigation by both sides.
During the late nineteenth century, the equal protection clause was a. not implemented because of a lack of tax revenue. b. severely limited in scope by the Supreme Court. c. more strongly defended by individual states than by the federal government. d. ruled unconstitutional.
Answer: B severely limited in scope by the Supreme court
Explanation:
The meaning of the Equal Protection Clause has been the subject of much debate, and inspired the well-known phrase "Equal Justice Under Law". This clause was the basis for Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the Supreme Court decision that helped to dismantle racial segregation, and also the basis for many other decisions rejecting discrimination against, and bigotry towards people belonging to various groups.
Answer:
Option-(B): Severely limited in scope by the Supreme Court inside the United States of America.Explanation:
It has been always the concern for the system and the top officials of any state to provide equal or basic rights for each of the individuals inside the country or we can say the territory in which the individuals live in, while there is always some difficulties for some of the communities irrespective of the number of individuals belonging to that very community.As, for the people inside the US during the late nineteenth century there were some difficulties faced by the African Americans as there was some reason due to which the Supreme Court was not able implement the rules which were required for providing the basic rights to all the individuals and giving way to peace and prosperity to flourish inside the region.Why did the fear of communism spread and intensify in the United States during the 1910s, leading to the Red Scare?
A
The communists who were victorious in the Russian Revolution called for a worldwide communist revolution.
B
The victorious countries in World War I imposed communist reforms on the countries that were defeated.
C
The Communist Party of the United States grew in power and several of its members were elected to Congress.
D
The poor economic conditions caused by the Treaty of Versailles helped communists take power in Germany.
You are writing a memo to staff members outlining the solution to a lingering problem. Some are intimately familiar with the problem; others are not. You consider what the staff members know and how they might react to the proposed solution.
Answer:
Anticipating
Explanation:
The knowledge and understanding of all staff in the organization will be considered in drafting the memo. This is essential to make sure that you have a clear view of the staff's understanding of the whole scenario and the probable cause of the lingering problem. This will ensure that the necessary steps are taken to solve the problem and prevent it from happening again.
The question involves writing a memo to staff members about a problem and its proposed solution. It's important to explain the problem and solution clearly, anticipating how different staff members might react based on their knowledge of the situation.
Explanation:This topic pertains to writing a memo with a proposed solution to an existing problem for staff members, considering their varying levels of familiarity with the problem. The key here is to establish the problem clearly for those not familiar and then outline the solution so that it is understood by all.
For example, if the problem is a lingering software issue, the memo might begin by briefly describing the issue, how it impacts the company, and then lay out the proposed solution. It's also crucial to anticipate reactions. Those unfamiliar with the problem may react differently from those who deal with it daily. End with an invitation for further feedback to ensure everyone feels involved in the solution process.
Learn more about memo writing here:https://brainly.com/question/32801651
#SPJ3
The high point for David is the reception of the Davidic covenant. The covenant’s unconditional nature and conditional blessing set the stage for the rest of 2 Samuel.A. TRUEB. FALSE
The high point for David is the reception of the Davidic covenant. The covenant’s unconditional nature and conditional blessing set the stage for the rest of 2 Samuel. This statement is true.
What is the Davidic covenant?Davidic covenant is the agreement in which God assures the people of God that a Davidic ancestor will hold the throne. In that it calls for a Davidic king to be the one through whom God would fulfill the promises of land, offspring, and blessing, it is a continuation of the preceding covenants.
The Davidic covenant is conditional in that the kingdom has been punished, destroyed, and has ceased to exist, but it is unconditional in that YHWHs will not turn away from it even though the kingdom is currently going through a period of chastisement as a result of its disloyalty.
Therefore, This statement is true.
Learn more about Davidic covenant, here;
https://brainly.com/question/14987122
#SPJ6
Briefly explain ONE historical perspective expressed by the artist about the changes from the period 1869–1877 to the period 1877–1881.
"The Solid South" is seen struggling under the "Carpet Bag and Bayonet Rule" of the "Strong" United States government, led by President Ulysses S. Grant, who is seen riding among bayonets with an escort of two federal soldiers.
The illustration shows a destroyed and occupied South.
Answer:1. "The Solid South" is seen struggling under the "Carpet Bag and Bayonet Rule" of the "Strong" United States government, led by President Ulysses S. Grant, who is seen riding among bayonets with an escort of two federal soldiers.
2. In the background, the illustration shows a destroyed and occupied South.
3. Rutherford B. Hayes, the "Carpet Bag and Bayonet Rule" is being plowed under the president's "Let'em Alone Policy."
3. Under this "Weak" government, the New South is depicted and factories and fields thrive in the background. A white man, presumably a land owner, is drawn to giving orders to an African-American, presumably a sharecropper or tenant farmer.
4. artist views Grant's government as more beneficial for saving the rights of blacks while the weak government of Hayes allows for the prolonging of "slavery" in sharecropping
Explanation:
Hispanic children who are English Language Learners at the age of 5: a. are generally identified as gifted. learn better with phonics than European American children do. b. are likely to do less well in math because their focus is on language. c. fall further behind their peers academically with each passing year.
Answer:
are likely to do less well in math because their focus is on language
Explanation:
What concession was made by President Kennedy to end the Cuban Missile Crisis?
A
The United States would withdraw all of its military forces from Turkey.
B
The United States would decommission its tactical nuclear weapons.
C
The United States would cease spy operations in Russia.
D
The United States would not attempt to invade Cuba.
Answer:
The right choice is :
D. The United States would not attempt to invade Cuba.
Explanation:
The issue was raised during the Missile Crisis of 1962, the moment of the Cold War humanity came closest to nuclear war. The US discovered Soviet bases for nuclear missiles being installed in Cuba and president John F. Kennedy demanded their dismantling and withdrawal. He ordered a naval blockade of Cuba and put the armed forces on high alert. In secret negotiations with the Kremlin, Soviet top leader Nikita Khrushchev agreed to dismantle them and Kennedy gave the USSR a guarantee that the US would not invade Cuba.
The answer to your question is D
Indicate whether the italicized clause is an independent clause or a subordinate clause.Do you think Professor Sullivan will ask for detailed information about Woodrow Wilson on the final, or do you think he’ll focus on World War I and the Treaty of Versailles?
Answer: The italicized clause is a subordinate clause.
Professor Sullivan will focus on World War I and the Treaty of Versailles
Explanation:
An independent clause is grammatically complete and can stand alone as a complete sentence, whereas a subordinate clause relies on being connected to a main clause to express a complete thought.
Explanation:In the sentence provided, "Do you think Professor Sullivan will ask for detailed information about Woodrow Wilson on the final, or do you think he’ll focus on World War I and the Treaty of Versailles?", there are no italicized clauses to identify as either an independent clause or a subordinate clause. However, it is important to know that an independent clause can stand alone as a complete sentence because it expresses a complete thought and contains a subject and a predicate. On the other hand, a subordinate clause, also known as a dependent clause, cannot stand alone and depends on the main clause to provide a complete thought. Subordinate clauses often start with subordinating conjunctions like 'although', 'because', or 'when'.
In relation to the provided reference material, an independent clause is grammatically complete by itself, while a dependent clause is not and needs to be connected to another clause. For example, the sentence 'We went to the museum.' is an independent clause. When altered with a subordinating conjunction to 'After we went to the museum...', it becomes a dependent clause, indicating its reliance on additional information to form a complete sentence.
Discuss the similarities and differences between the British and American concepts of representative government. How did the differences in their concepts contribute to the coming of the American Revolution?
Answer:
Check the explanation
Explanation:
During the late colonial times, there was an obvious disparity between American and British ideas. The British held on to the idea of “virtual representation.” What this means is that they established the idea that prevented some men from voting for their representatives. They were of the opinion that all individuals would be represented basically because members of Parliament would have their best interests in mind. Putting it In other words, the Parliamentary members would be like parents who would do the right thing and also make the right choice for their “children” (the constituents) even if the children had no say in the matter.
though there were some similiarities like In American representation, the term 'conservative' means entirely right-wing, especially when it comes to social issues. In Britain the name 'Conservative' entirely right-wing, especially when it involves economic issues.
Lucky Used Cars, using their contracts form, agree to sell Alvin a truck for $5,000. The contract provides that it may not be modified—except by a signed writing. After entering into the contract, Lucky and Alvin orally agree that Lucky will include new floor mats and a bed liner for an extra $100. At the time of delivery, Lucky refuses to provide the new floor mats and bed liner unless Alvin pays an extra $250. Discuss the enforceability of the oral agreement Lucky and Alvin had.
In this example, we learn that the contract specifies that the only way in which this can be modified is through writing. However, it is important to be aware of the fact that any such clause in a contract provided by a merchant to a non-merchant would necessarily have to be accompanied by a separate signature by the non-merchant in order to be effective. As this was not the case in the example, then the clause would not be considered valid, and the oral agreement could still be enforceable.
The enforceability of the oral agreement for additional items in a truck sale might be recognized by the courts if Alvin can prove the agreement, although the original contract stipulates modifications need to be in writing. The agreement depends on various factors, including the conduct of the parties and principles of equity.
Explanation:The enforceability of the oral agreement between Lucky and Alvin can be complex due to the existence of the original written contract, which states that modifications must be made through a signed writing. However, contract law generally recognizes that an oral agreement to modify a contract can still be valid under certain circumstances, despite such a clause.
In practice, issues may arise if one party, such as Lucky, decides not to honor the oral modification. If Alvin can prove that the oral agreement was reached, perhaps through witnesses or admission by Lucky, the courts might enforce it, especially if Alvin has already acted in reliance on the agreement (e.g., by paying the extra $100). On the other hand, the presence of the written clause could complicate matters and Lucky may argue that any modification needs to adhere strictly to the 'signed writing' requirement.
If a dispute reaches court, the outcome would depend on the specific laws and facts of the case, including considerations of the earlier agreement, subsequent conduct, and principles of fairness and equity. Alvin may face challenges, but he is not necessarily without legal recourse.
What was an outcome of the War of 1812?
A.impressment of US soldiers
B.unchanged US borders
C.the Embargo Act
D.the Nonintercourse Act
↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑
TRUE AWNSERS ONLY
Answer:
A. impressment of US soldiers
Explanation:
If a member of the House of Representatives makes decision solely on his belief, what could happen to that person in the election?
The person could not be voted on because of the values that the members would have, because the vote would be more randomly given than correctly in relation to voting. Voting at the House of Representatives should be more than just your personal values. Because the senators and representatives are elected by direct vote.
why do the petitionar place so much emphasis on their loyalty to the Union during the war?
Answer:
The petitioners place so much emphasis on their loyalty to the Union during the war because:
The emancipation Proclamation originated from the North (Union Government) This amendment freed slaves in the south.
Explanation:
The petitioners placed emphasis on the loyalty of the slaves because they wanted to prove that they were going to conduct the respective duties a "free men" had, therefore they were so strong in that argument. Because they wanted to let them know that benefits carried responsibilities and duties with them. Because they feared they would not exercise them and be very difficult to follow citizens' duties and responsibilities.
According to the passage, both of these immigrants moved to Mexico to
gain an education.
pursue creative work.
advance in their careers.
open their own businesses.
THE ANSWER IS C
Option c is the correct answer.
advance in their careers.
What was the program that brought Mexicans into the United States to work?
The Bracero program was created in 1942 by a presidential order called the Mexican Farm Labor Program. This series of diplomatic agreements between Mexico and the United States has allowed millions of Mexican men to legally work in the United States on a temporary contract.
The Bracero program was an agreement between the United States and Mexico that allowed nearly 4.6 million Mexican citizens to temporarily travel to the United States and work on farms, railroads, and factories between 1942 and 1964.
Learn more about the Bracero program here https://brainly.com/question/25829549
#SPJ2
To what extent do you agree with the view that
initiating the Purification Movement was a major
error of judgement by Chiang Kai-shek?
The discussion should include issues such as Chiang's
motives for initiating the Movement, and the impact it
had on China in general and the KMT in particular.
I agree. His motivations were not bad such as save China but in that time they did not have a stable government, so it was not good for them all.
When Chiang returned to China in 1911, he participated in a revolution that ended the Qing Manchu dynasty, which then reigned in the country. With that, it transformed China into a republic. However, for many years there was no stable government, as some feudal warlords, who dominated the provinces, fought for power.
After a period of study in the Soviet Union, Chiang returned to China in 1923. Two years later, he replaced Sun at the helm of the Kuomintang (Nationalist Party). At that time the Communists were part of the Nationalist Party, but in 1927 Chiang Kai-shek expelled them from it. Chiang also rose up against the warlords and, in 1928, established a new government. Warlords and Communists, however, continued to oppose him.
When Japan invaded China in 1937, Chiang made a temporary alliance with the communists to fight the invaders. This struggle became part of the larger World War II conflict. After the Japanese surrender in 1945, the Communists turned against Chiang again. In 1949 they defeated him and founded the People's Republic of China. Chiang Kai-shek transferred his nationalist government to the island of Taiwan, where he died on April 5, 1975.
Which of the following was one of the most popular concert attractions in eighteenth century America? Multiple Choice traditional military funeral parades. battle pieces. performances of Mozart. performances of Haydn.
Answer:
Explanation:
???????????????????????????
Final answer:
Performances of Haydn were one of the most popular concert attractions in eighteenth century America.
Explanation:
In the eighteenth century, one of the most popular concert attractions in America was Performances of Haydn.
Haydn was a prominent composer during this time, known for his symphonies and chamber music.
A. They removed British troops from Boston. B. They did not take the actions of Congress seriously because to them George Washington was an inexperienced commander. C. They declared that the colonies were in a state of rebellion. D. They sent diplomats to negotiate for peace. E. They asked the Spanish and French for help to defeat the Americans.
Answer: C. They declared that the colonies were in a state of rebellion.
Question: The first committee started in Charleston, South Carolina, and more were created in other colonies except New England. When the Second Continental Congress created an official army, how did the British respond?
Explanation: In the 1770s, colonists had become dissatisfied with the British authorities due to severe taxes and lack of representation in the Parliament. In 1775, the second continental congress met and decided to go to war. They created an army under the command of George Washington.
Despite the vote passing, some members of the Congress did not like the idea of independence and worked to maintain good relations with King George III but by then the king had declared that the colonies were in a state of rebellion.
The correct answer is letter C
Throughout the 1760s and 1770s, political relations between England and the Thirteen Colonies became increasingly complicated. On the one hand, England wanted to impose taxes and demands that it never imposed on American settlers before. In contrast, the residents of the Thirteen Colonies, accustomed to autonomy, did not intend to submit to this new policy of the British metropolis.
Dissatisfied with this situation, the most prominent representatives of the colonies decided to meet at the First Continental Congress of Philadelphia, organized in 1774. At that event, their participants drew up a document in which they demanded an end to the taxes established by the British authorities. Apart from separatist pretensions, this first political action by the colonists was intended to peacefully reverse the interventionist tone adopted by the British.
Without achieving the expected effect, other settlers believed that the military conflict could end the colonialist pretensions of the English government. In 1775, some settlers already organized themselves militarily to carry out a confrontation against England. That same year, during the Second Continental Congress of Philadelphia, a larger contingent of supporters advocated definitive separation through the organization of direct confrontation.
This process involved a teacher asking students questions and them guiding the students to an answer using the student's own ability to reason.
The correct answer is Socratic Method
Socrates' philosophy, responsible for giving rise to the Socratic method, had as principle the construction of knowledge instead of the mere transmission of ideas. In his time, knowledge was characterized as a type of commerce, where teachers (known as sophists) charged for ready-made content and speeches that students were forced to memorize.
Contrary to this practice, Socrates was convinced that it was the dialogues that favored a true exchange of knowledge, because through them the disciples would be able to reflect on their own statements and conclusions. Using Irony and Maieutic - fundamental principles in all Socratic thought - he encouraged his interlocutors to expose and defend their opinions and then strip them of any illusion of knowing and extracting true knowledge.
Contrary to the current meaning of the term, in the original sense of the Greek word Irony represents a question in the form of a refutation; on the other hand, Maieutic consists of an analysis of successive responses to search for the truth, stimulating thinking from what is not known. Thus, the dialogue begins with the definition of an objective and the request for commitment in defining the object of the discussion. An objection based on examples is made on the definition presented and a new definition is requested, which will be refuted again through another example and so on, in a sequence where definitions, objections, refutation and conclusion will be presented, leading the interlocutor to extract from himself the best answer.
Through the elaboration of his method, Socrates left as legacy to humanity his concern in making people more critical and responsible for his own knowledge. In this way, autonomy, built from self-reflection, is also a subject present in his works.
What ideologies of change were spread by revolutionary france in the years 1789-1814? who tried to suppress these new ideas? why? what were the results? how did society change as a result of the french and industrial revolutions?
Answer:
The ideologies of the French Revolution were mainly the discontent on the French monarchy and the feudal system.
Explanation:
In that time, the French citizens weren´t happy with their actual monarchy, all caused by the death of the King and the raised of their new queen: Marie Antoniette, who was really young to gobernate and took the french crown to bankrupcy.
The french citizens were poor and the monarchy wasn´t seeking for their citizens well being, which caused their discontent and in result, a revolution.
Despite the bloody war and measures of the citizens, the country changed completely, showing to all the people over the world that when a town isnpt happy, revolution is across the street. This is why the French revolution was the pioneer of all the other big revolutions that happened all over the world.
What are the similarities in the motivations (push/pull factors and goals) of the Wellton 26 and the Third Wave (1890-1930) immigrants we studied? (Cite evidence for this question.) Based on what you now know about U.S. immigration history, what is your assessment of Urrea’s portrayal of the border? (You do not necessarily need to cite evidence for this question.) Chat Conversation End Type a message...
Answer:
The Wellton 26 were known as a group of 26 Mexicans that attempted to move to the US through the Mexico-US border. Most of the Mexicans wanted a greener pasture for their families. They thought there would be better job opportunities if the move to the US. They trekked and walked along the 'Devil's Highway' that is known as the deadliest region in the Southern Arizona desert. Due to the adverse conditions of the desert, fourteen of the Mexican died on their way to the border. This story shows the struggles of immigrants and what they will give to get a better future for their families.
It is paramount to analyze the push and pull factors behind the immigration of the 26 Wallton from Mexico to the US. These two factors were highly motivated by financial reasons. They want to get better job opportunities, more money, and a better future for their families.
Explanation:
The Wellton 26 were known as a group of 26 Mexicans that attempted to move to the US through the Mexico-US border. Most of the Mexicans wanted a greener pasture for their families. They thought there would be better job opportunities if the move to the US. They trekked and walked along the 'Devil's Highway' that is known as the deadliest region in the Southern Arizona desert. Due to the adverse conditions of the desert, fourteen of the Mexican died on their way to the border. This story shows the struggles of immigrants and what they will give to get a better future for their families.
It is paramount to analyze the push and pull factors behind the immigration of the 26 Wallton from Mexico to the US. These two factors were highly motivated by financial reasons. They want to get better job opportunities, more money, and a better future for their families.
Final answer:
The Wellton 26 and Third Wave immigrants were similarly motivated by push and pull factors, including economic and political instability at home and the promise of opportunity in the U.S. Urrea's portrayal of the border reflects the enduring challenges and hopes of migrants.
Explanation:
The motivations of both the Wellton 26 and the Third Wave immigrants (1890-1930) we studied share key similarities, centered around the push and pull factors and the overarching goal of seeking better opportunities. The primary push factors for both groups involved escaping poor economic conditions, political instability, or persecution in their home countries. Meanwhile, the pull factors included the allure of economic opportunities, political freedom, and a chance at a new beginning in the United States.
For the Third Wave immigrants, this was characterized by the industrial boom and the need for labor in the U.S., as highlighted by the immense immigration inflow between 1860-1910. In contrast, for the Wellton 26, it was the modern-day pursuit of employment and safety that drove their journey. Luis Alberto Urrea’s portrayal of the border, through this lens, brings a humanizing perspective to the harsh realities and dangers encountered by contemporary migrants, mirroring historical narratives of hope and hardship that have long defined U.S. immigration.
During the Cold War, religious differences: a) created much division among Americans. b) were heightened by the growth of the suburbs. c) were not a factor, as church and synagogue membership declined. d) were intensified through the institution of school prayer. e) were absorbed within the notion of a common Judeo-Christian heritage.
During the Cold War, religious differences were absorbed within the notion of a common Judeo-Christian heritage. Hence, option E is correct.
What is a Judeo-Christian culture?The phrase "the Judeo-Christian tradition" now days is most frequently used to refer to "those theological, ethical, or cultural ideals or ideas considered to be similar to both Judaism and Christianity." Quite obvious, perhaps.
Human souls are essentially mortal, but through a divine miracle, the body is brought back to life and given the ability to coexist eternally with the soul. Note that Greek dualism is defeated by the Hebrew notion of psycho-physical oneness.
A Judeo-Christian tradition is an idea that derives from the Christian doctrine of supersession, according to which the Christian covenant (or Testament) with God surpasses the Jewish one. This idea holds that Christianity transforms and supersedes Judaism.
Thus, option E is correct.
For more information about Judeo-Christian culture, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/25596158
#SPJ5
What does this excerpt tell you about the nature of
the fighting in Vietnam?
The communist forces lacked heavy weapons
like artillery.
American troops withdrew easily by
helicopter
US troops had to move and fight the enemy
on the ground.
O Fighting stopped during the night so each
side could recover.
DONE
A writer should
to organize ideas for a document-based essay.
Answer:
Create an outline.
Explanation:
'Outlining' is elucidated as the process that aims to offer a map or plan of the entire idea or content that is going to be displayed to the audience.
As per the question, 'creating an outline' would help in organizing an essay that is document-based as it would assist in categorizing the key points of the work along with its sub-points and evidences that would be presented to substantiate each claim in a format. Thus, it helps in proffering an organized form to the content that would establish the coherence in ideas.
A writer should, create an outline, to organize ideas for a document based essay.
Why did Clarence Darrow agree to defend Scopes?
When Thomas Jefferson said in 1801, "We are all Republicans-we are all Federalists," he meant that A) Americans would never ally themselves with monarchical governments B) federalists would be appointed to his cabinet C) the two parties' platforms were identical D) the principles of American government were above party politics E) he admired Hamilton's policies
Final answer:
Thomas Jefferson's statement, "We are all Republicans-we are all Federalists" meant that the principles of American government were above party politics, aiming at national unity after a divisive election.
Explanation:
When Thomas Jefferson declared, "We are all Republicans-we are all Federalists" in 1801, he was emphasizing the idea that despite the political divisions between Republicans and Federalists, the underlying principles of American governance were of greater importance than the factional party politics of the time. Jefferson's words came after a bitterly contested election and marked his inauguration as a gesture towards national unity. The correct interpretation of his statement would be (D) the principles of American government were above party politics. This assertion was made to bridge the polarizing gap between the two parties and to convey that unity and mutual respect should prevail for the nation's prosperity.