Final answer:
Tajikistan, Pakistan, and China border Afghanistan and have regions where the elevation exceeds 10,000 feet, with significant mountain ranges like the Pamirs, Karakoram, and part of the Himalayas.
Explanation:
Countries Bordering Afghanistan with High Elevations
The countries that border Afghanistan where the elevation is over 10,000 feet are primarily Tajikistan, Pakistan, and China. Tajikistan has significant mountainous regions with the Pamirs, where the Tian Shan, Karakorum, and Hindu Kush mountain ranges meet, often known as the Pamir Knot. Pakistan is known for the Karakoram mountain range, with peaks over 26,000 feet, including K2, the world's second-highest peak. China's western border with Afghanistan also features high elevations, particularly as part of the Himalayas and the Karakorum ranges.
While not all areas along the borders meet the 10,000 feet criteria, these regions have significant mountain ranges that exceed this elevation. Afghanistan's rugged terrain, including the Hindu Kush, has shaped its history and presents both challenges and opportunities for the region.
Why was it difficult to maintain the crusade kingdoms
Maintaining the Crusader Kingdoms was difficult due to internal conflicts among European aristocrats, the failure to maintain strong alliances, the confusion and subsequent military coordination among Muslims, the challenges of long-distance administration, and a constant shortage of settlers and soldiers from Europe.
Explanation:Difficulties in Maintaining the Crusader Kingdoms
The Crusader Kingdoms, established during the period of the Crusades from 1096 to 1291, faced numerous challenges to their stability and longevity. The Crusaders often alienated potential allies such as the Byzantine Empire by not returning cities or lands as promised. Moreover, the European aristocrats' thirst for individual power often led to internal conflicts, weakening the Crusader States against a common enemy. The Muslim response, although initially confused, became more coordinated and potent over time, as exemplified by leaders like Imad al-Din Zengi who recaptured Edessa, signaling the vulnerability of the crusaders' position.
Additionally, the long distances from Europe made it difficult to maintain a robust flow of settlers or soldiers to Outremer, necessitating the establishment of crusading orders and formidable fortresses like Krak des Chevaliers. Despite the economic and social integration to some extent, including the use of existing tax systems by Christian landlords and the continuity of Islamic and Jewish institutions, the Crusader States faced a shortage of manpower and a hostile surrounding population imbued with religious and cultural differences. This reality, compounded by competing priorities and political dynamics within Europe, made sustaining the Crusades overly onerous. As such, the crusading movement eventually waned, with other geopolitical factors, including the rise of nation-states, drawing more attention and resources away from the Holy Land.
who lived in the desert praying for god to deliver them from the romans.
A Zealots
B Maccabees
C Prophets
D Essenes
Using complete sentences, explain what a hurricane is and how many affect the United States annually. Describe the damages caused by Hurricane Katrina in 2005. please need help brainliest
Hurricane Katrina was one of the deadliest hurricanes ever to hit the United States. An estimated 1,833 people died in the hurricane and the flooding that followed in late August 2005, and millions of others were left homeless along the Gulf Coast and in New Orleans.
Hurricanes are large, swirling storms. They produce winds of 119 kilometers per hour (74 mph) or higher. ... Winds from a hurricane can damage buildings and trees. Hurricanes form over warm ocean waters.
Katrina was the most destructive storm to strike the United States and the costliest storm in U.S. history, causing $108 billion in damage, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). It ranks sixth overall in strength of recorded Atlantic hurricanes. It was also a very large storm; at its peak, maximum winds stretched 25 to 30 nautical miles (46 to 55 kilometers) and its extremely wide swath of hurricane force winds extended at least 75 nautical miles (138 km) to the east from the center.
7) This territory was the site of six Spanish missions and included the Sea Islands and the land between the Altamaha and Savannah Rivers.
the town's destroyed by mount Vesuvius sat along which body of water
Ethnic music of ______ is known for its beautiful, simple melodies.
in ireland, this is the answer fashoo
What was the importance of the Battle of Kettle Creek
The Battle of Kettle Creek was fought during the American Revolution on this day in 1779. ... It was a small victory, but it was significant, and provided a morale boost for the American cause, after Savannah had fallen two months earlier.
The bush was not consumed means?
A the bush was burned up
B The bush only looked like it was burning
C The bush was not burned up
D The bush was not eaten
Answer:
The answer is C I took the test
Explanation:
Hope this helps
How did the Gold Rush affect the following: U.S. population, the environment, and the treatment of minorities?
Explanation:
In 1848 gold rush caused more destruction. Violence and destroyed the tribes.
The gold rust affected the U.S. population as it created economic growth as there was an enduring impact by inducing significant industrial and farming development.The environment effect of gold has on the landscape of California, Rivers became clogged with sediment, mining cause damage to the land and dam were constructed which messed with the rivers.Gold rush also affected the treatment of minorities because it provided them more funds.Plzzz Help!!!!! If you answer plz be right!!!!
The Caddos were an American Indian group in Texas that practiced agriculture and built permanent houses. What can be inferred about the group? (1point)
A it created large populations .
Bit formed a small and defenseless population.
Cit had no contact with other groups.
D it was nomadic for only half of the year.
Which of the following statements best summarizes the American Indians of Texas?
A all descended from the Pueblo group and continued their lifestyle. (1point)
B they hunted buffalo and lived in teepees.
C they practiced peaceful relationship with each other
D a wide variety of groups and cultures existed
At the times of early European exploration in the sixteenth century, what area of Texas did the Coahuiltecans occupy? (1point)
A eastern
B northern
C southern
D western
What big game first led American Indians to Texas? (1point)
A bison
B deer
C mammoth
D rabbit
Answer:
Option-(B): The Caddos were an American Indian group in Texas that practiced agriculture and built permanent houses, as it created large populations . Bit formed a small and defenseless population.Option-(B): The American Indians of Texas were rich in culture as they had a number of resources for food and shelter but they mostly hunted buffalo and lived teepees.Option-(B): At the times of early European exploration in the sixteenth century. the northern areas of Texas was occupied by the Coahuiltecans.Option-(C): The first ever game led by the American Indians to Texas was of the mammoth's.
What program of active government intervention addressed the Great Depression, and how did it avert a social revolution in the United States
How would officials have taken a census of China’s population
Do only human-interest matter morally, or is the natural world intrinsically valuable? in your view, is our treatment of animals, in particular, factory farming, morally legitimate?
The moral treatment of animals and the legitimacy of factory farming is a complex subject within ethics. Ethical theories suggest varying degrees of moral obligation toward animals, with some arguing for the importance of animal welfare and others against the use of animals for human consumption. The discussion indicates a moral imperative for humane treatment and potential changes to farming practices.
Many ethical viewpoints suggest that animals possess inherent value and therefore merit moral consideration. Among these, utilitarian theorists like in the provided reference argue that the rightness or wrongness of actions is dependent on whether they increase overall happiness. Following this theory, practices such as factory farming would likely be deemed morally wrong due to the suffering imposed on animals. Furthermore, the concept of speciesism - the prioritization of human interests over the interests of other species - is often challenged by ethical arguments that favor extending moral consideration to animals based on their capacity to experience pain and pleasure.
Some ethical approaches argue that it is morally permissible to consume animals if their treatment meets certain standards of welfare, or if their use is necessary for survival, whereas other perspectives, such as rights-based approaches, argue that animals have rights similar to humans and that it is morally wrong to use them as means to our ends regardless of the perceived benefits to humans. This debate extends to the moral obligations we may have towards animals, and whether those obligations should influence practices such as meat consumption, factory farming, and the conditions under which animals are raised and slaughtered. The discourse suggests that humane treatment of animals and consideration for their welfare are morally imperative, and changes to current farming practices are necessary to align with such ethical positions.
Important animal resource of great plains indians
Answer:
buffalo
Explanation:
The buffalo was the most important natural resource of the Plains Indians. The Plains Indians were hunters. They hunted many kinds of animals, but it was the buffalo which provided them with all of their basic needs: food, clothing, and shelter.
How has the study of natural history changed over time
Natural history has evolved from static, unchanging views to a complex interdisciplinary study incorporating evolutionary theory and the deep time perspective. Early naturalists like Robert Hooke challenged traditional views, and the introduction of evolutionary ideas in the eighteenth century led to the modern understanding of Earth's dynamic processes. Continuous advancements in science have refined the study of natural history, providing insights into how nature shapes humanity.
Explanation:The study of natural history has undergone significant changes over time, with early views often being static and unchanging. As scientific thought evolved, figures like Robert Hooke and naturalists in the eighteenth century began to challenge these views, suggesting that nature has undergone change throughout the ages. The discovery of fossils far from oceans and on mountaintops led to an understanding of Earth's dynamic geography, while ideas on evolution and extinction of species emerged. James Hutton's theory of gradual geological change and Charles Lyell's ideas further paved the way for understanding Earth's deep time. The acceptance of the greater age of Earth provided the context needed for the theory of evolution by natural selection, later solidified by Charles Darwin's work. Today, the analysis of the fossil record and archaeological findings continue to refine our understanding of natural history, using both empirical evidence and educated speculation.
Scientific advancements and the continuous reinterpretation of evidence, aided by technology and better methodologies, have allowed for more accurate reconstructions of prehistoric life. In recent times, conservation efforts have led to the collection of specimens, aiding zooarchaeologists and archaeobotanists in comparative analyses. Simultaneously, the studies of archaeologists, anthropologists, genetic scientists, and historians contribute to a more nuanced understanding of how nature shapes humanity, with significant implications for biological and cultural adaptations. The field of natural history, with its interdisciplinary approach, continues to illuminate our past and influence our future.
Final answer:
The study of natural history has evolved from a static view of nature to a dynamic understanding of evolution and geological change. Key figures in this evolution include Buffon, Hutton, and Darwin, with the latter's theory of evolution by natural selection being a turning point.
Explanation:
The study of natural history has undergone significant transformations over time, evolving with scientific breakthroughs and the changing perspectives of humanity on nature and ourselves. Notably, the understanding of how nature shapes humanity has been heavily influenced by the work of anthropologists and naturalists. Early views, influenced by figures such as Aristotle, held that nature was static, but this belief was challenged over centuries, leading to the realization that Earth and its living inhabitants have undergone constant change.
In the eighteenth century, naturalists like Georges-Louis Leclerc, Comte de Buffon, and James Hutton proposed that species evolve and that geological changes occur gradually over time, concepts that contrasted with the catastrophic events model of Earth's history. The most significant leap in understanding came from Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection, which provided a scientific basis for species change over time.
President Washington signed into law the Judiciary Act of 1789, which established the federal court system. What was the result of this act?
How did the geography of Greece influence Greek economic activity?
Answer:
The geography of Greece influenced Greece economic activity because they encouraged people to use the sea for food and trade.
Explanation:
Which did NOT invade Babylon
Answer:
Babylon was invaded by the Achaemenid Empire led by Cyrus The Great. So, according to the question, you can infer that, except for the Persian Empire, other nations didn´t invade Babylon. For instance, you can answer the question by stating that Japanese or Chinese didn´t invade Babylon. Keep in mind that is important to provide further details like an specific timeframe, i.e.: Century III BCE or II BCE.
Explanation:
Where is a person tried when they are accused of a federal crime
A person accused of a federal crime is tried in federal court and has the right to a trial by jury.
Explanation:A person accused of a federal crime is tried in federal court. According to the Fifth Amendment, a person can be tried in federal court for a felony, such as a serious crime, after a grand jury issues an indictment.
It is important to note that the trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury, as stated in the Constitution. This means that the person accused will have the right to a trial by a jury of their peers.
An individual found not guilty of all charges will be released, while someone found guilty of one or more offenses will receive a sentence determined by the judge based on guidelines.
Final answer:
A person accused of a federal crime is tried in a federal court, often after indictment by a grand jury. Trials by jury are mandated by the Constitution for federal crimes committed within a state, while Congress may direct the location if outside a state. The federal sentencing guidelines usually affect the sentence following a guilty verdict.
Explanation:
When a person is accused of a federal crime, they are tried in a federal court. According to the Fifth Amendment and the Supreme Court's interpretation, the grand jury process ensures that a person facing serious charges, such as a felony, will be indicted if there's sufficient evidence to proceed to trial. For non-federal crimes, states must use a process of indictment that is equally fair as the federal system, even if it is not a grand jury.
Federal crimes are those that violate federal law, and the trials for these crimes occur at the federal level rather than at the state or local levels. This distinction is important, as it also relates to the concept of double jeopardy, where a person cannot be tried twice for the same crime at the same level of government; however, a federal trial may proceed after a state trial if federal laws were also violated.
The Constitution stipulates that the trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, should be by jury (Section 2 Clause 3). This includes federal crimes, where the trial should be held in the state where the crime was committed unless otherwise directed by Congress, as trial by jury is seen as a fundamental right within the judicial system.
If the crime was not committed within any state, Congress has the authority to determine the trial location. The federal sentencing guidelines typically influence the sentencing phase if the defendant is found guilty, which assigns point values to various offenses and facts in the case.
What is a compass rose
What are the 3 major Muslim empires? Which group built the largest Muslim empire.
What was the main reason the middle kingdom ended?
The main reason for the end of the Middle Kingdom of Egypt was the invasion of the Hyksos, external rulers of Canaanite or West Asian origin. This invasion, coupled with internal weaknesses and potential environmental factors, led to the decline and fragmentation of the Middle Kingdom, marking its end.
The Middle Kingdom of Egypt, a period in ancient Egyptian history that lasted from approximately 2050 BCE to 1710 BCE, came to an end primarily due to a combination of external and internal factors:Hyksos Invasion: The primary external factor was the invasion of the Hyksos, a group of foreign rulers believed to be of Canaanite or West Asian origin. They invaded Egypt, likely taking advantage of political instability and exploiting Egypt's weakened state.Internal Weakness: Prior to the Hyksos invasion, the Middle Kingdom saw periods of political fragmentation and instability. Weak central authority and regional governors known as nomarchs weakened the unity of Egypt.Natural Disasters: Some historians suggest that environmental factors, such as a prolonged drought, may have contributed to the decline of the Middle Kingdom. A scarcity of resources could have exacerbated social and political tensions.The combined effects of external invasion, internal divisions, and possible environmental challenges led to the decline of the Middle Kingdom. Eventually, the Hyksos ruled over parts of Egypt, marking the end of this period.For more questions on Egypt
https://brainly.com/question/17935107
#SPJ6
(50points) The Congress desired to sell the lands of the Northwest Territory because they ___ for retiring debts incurred during the war. A had over invested B needed the money C couldn't trade them D were investing e wanted to purchase other things
The Congress desired to sell the lands of the Northwest Territory because they needed money for retiring debts incurred during the war. The correct option is b.
What are the Northwest Territories?The Northwest Territories formerly North-Western Territory and North-West Territories and shortened as Northwest Territory is a federal territory of Canada. At a land area of approximately 1,144,000 km2 and a 2016 census population of 41,790, it is the second-largest and the most populous of the three territories in Northern Canada. Its estimated population as of 2022 is 45,605.
Yellowknife is the capital, most populous community, and only city in the territory; its population was 19,569 as of the 2016 census. It became the territorial capital in 1967, following recommendations by the Carrothers Commission. The Northwest Territories, a portion of the old North-Western Territory, entered the Canadian Confederation on July 15, 1870.
Since then, the territory has been divided four times to create new provinces and territories or enlarge existing ones.
Learn more about Northwest, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29034216
#SPJ3
explain the consequences of allowing a scientist to withhold information from other scientists and the public.
Describe the type of society that would use a traditional economic system. How are the three basic economic questions answered in this system?
Answer:
The type of society that uses a traditional economic system would typically be an ethnic group or tribe. The traditional system is not typically used on a national level. Traditional economic systems answer basic economic questions by use of ritual, habit, or custom.
edg- 2022
Explanation:
Developing societies are those that rely on farming, fishing, hunting, collecting, or some mixture of these types of societies that would use a traditional economic system.
What is a traditional economic system?Agricultural, hunting, fishing, and collecting are only a few of the primary economic activities that are governed by conventions and customs in a traditional economy.
In a traditional economy, everyone has informed about their duties and responsibilities as well as the available resources and how they will be shared among the community in order to perform a particular job.
The three basic economic questions related to production what to produce, how to produce, and how to distribute will be answered as it is based on the manufacturing and distribution of the product.
Learn more about the traditional economic system, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30283837
#SPJ3
What was the Wilmot Proviso? Why was it so controversial?
Wilmot Proviso the Legislation in Mexico was won which says that no bondage should be carried out in the lands and approved by the House of Representation, however, Senate dismissed it. This law was formed in 1846, it was an effort to add this law to the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo also which says that any property transferred from the territory of Mexico would have no servitude.
The Wilmot Proviso, one of the significant developments pointing to the American Civil War. Slavery was outlawed in all region obtained from Mexico by Wilmot Proviso. This returned the common discussion over servitude and suspect happened. The population belonging to the South didn’t like the proviso and opposed because it assassinated common self-determination as an opportunity. This divided the community and brought on the retirement and ultimately the civil war.
which statement best describes the framework of government established by the constitution
A. the three branches of government defer the majority of power to the states
B. a system of checks and balances keeps each of the three branches from having too much power
C. the separation of powers calls for the house and Senate to be equally divided
D. the president is elected by a direct vote of the people
The statement that gives the best description of the framework of government established by the constitution is that there are the three branches of government that defer the majority of power to the states. Hence, Option A is correct.
What is a framework of government?The term "framework of government" is basically a kind of structure through which the whole government works in a nation. It is a governance framework in which the structure of a government is reflected.
The nation is formed by the interrelationship of the relationship factor and all those factors that invest in the institution. It is because the government structure is only used by the governance framework, which is used as the structure of the governments of the organization.
The reason why the framework of government is used is that the framework of government is established by a constitution of government that has legislative, executive, and judicial powers.
Thus, Option A is correct.
Learn more about framework of government from here:
https://brainly.com/question/2684180
#SPJ2
what was Ehud Barak's role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?
Ehud Barak, as Prime Minister of Israel, participated in significant peace negotiations during the Israeli-Palestinian conflict but was unable to secure a lasting agreement, leading to the Second Intifada.
Ehud Barak played a significant role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict during his tenure as Prime Minister of Israel from 1999 to 2001. His tenure was marked by vital attempts to negotiate peace with the Palestinians, including the Camp David Summit in 2000, where he attempted to reach a final agreement with Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat. Despite these efforts, talks ultimately failed, and the failure to resolve key issues such as the status of Jerusalem, the right of return for Palestinian refugees, and the borders of a future Palestinian state led to increased tensions and the subsequent outbreak of the Second Intifada or Al-Aqsa Intifada. Barak's actions illustrate the complexities of negotiating peace and the impact leadership can have on the trajectory of the conflict.
What was the Virginia plan?
Answer:
Each state would be represented by a number of representatives based on its population.
Explanation:
Please help will reward brainliest