Answer: Only Jasmine and Kanti will attend the party.
Explanation: This can be Analysed this way;
1. Kanti will attend only if Jasmine is there.
2. Jasmine will be unhappy if Samir attends, therefore Jasmine is unlikely not to attend if Samir is invited.
3. Samir will attend if Kanti will attend. And Kanti will only attend if Jasmine attend
From the three statement analyzed, this means that;
Jasmine will come even if Samir and Kanti won't come. And Samir and Kanti won't come if Jasmine did not come. That means Jasmine to attendance should be considered first. Therefore Jasmine should attend the party.
Now we will consider what can hinder Jasmine from coming. From statement 2 Jasmine may not come if Samir will be there. This means that Samir's invitation should not be considered. Therefore Samir will not come because she won't be invited.
Kanti will come when Jasmine is invited, even if Samir will will come. Therefore Kanti will be at the party and should be invited.
Given the conditions, to avoid conflict, it's better not to invite Jasmine, Kanti, or Samir to the party. The decision is a result of a series of logical reasoning based on the constraints provided in the question.
Explanation:This question is a logic puzzle. Following the conditional statements provided, here's some help to decide whom to invite. Since Kanti will not attend unless Jasmine also does, if you invite Jasmine, you may also want to invite Kanti. But remember, if Jasmine attends, she will become unhappy if Samir is there, and Samir will attend only if Kanti is there.
Combining these, we can conclude that if Jasmine attends, Kanti and Samir will also attend, which will make Jasmine unhappy. So to keep everyone happy, it's better not to invite any of them to the party. Ultimately, to ensure a harmonious party, it seems that Jasmine, Kanti, and Samir cannot be invited simultaneously.
Learn more about Logic Puzzle here:https://brainly.com/question/31721284
#SPJ3
The dispatchers and EMT's of East Haven Fire Department stay calm and focused in emergency situations. This suggests that, in these situations, they are setting aside their __________, or intense feelings directed at someone or something.
Answer: emotions
Explanation: Emotions or Intense feelings should be set aside on any job especially when its involves the safety of lives and properties
Answer:
They set aside their "EMOTION"
Explanation: East Haven Fire Department, is a fire fighter in the town of East Haven, located in South central. During an emergency situation, this department has the tendency of setting aside their emotions. They set aside emotions, so that they can concentrate on the fire, instead of crying or lamenting.
An emotion is ones feeling towards something or someone. For any emergency rescue job that mostly involve life or property damage, emotion should be set aside to avoid being tensed and uncomfortable.
You realize that your team is at risk of missing its project deadline so you persuade everyone to voluntarily stay an extra hour to get the project done. What are you?
Answer:
A leader
Explanation:
A leader is an individual who influences people towards the achievement of a set goal, he/she has the capacity of instigating motivation on his/her subordinates and who can motivate his subordinates towards meeting organizational goals, targets and deadlines.
What makes us help other people? Are the variables that make us more likely to help others genetic or environmental? Using research from the Shapiro Library, explain which factor—genetics or the environment—is more powerful in regards to helping behavior. Support your perspective using research and examples. Also, consider the strongest or most valid points that may be raised against your argument and counter them.
Explanation:
There are many reasons why people help each other. In some cases this is due to the fact that human beings have a feeling of empathy, which corresponds to putting themselves in the other person's shoes and therefore being motivated to help them when necessary. There are also ethical values that are shared by society, that we must act with solidarity and help those in need.
It is correct to say that genetic and environmental variables increase the likelihood that one person will help another, but the environmental factor may be stronger in the case of unexpected events, such as an environmental and social tragedy, conflicts, etc.
It is important to establish a sense of empathy in society, it is through it that relationships happen in a better way and people can live better and be happier.
Helping behavior is shaped by both genetics and the environment. A genetic inclination towards altruism can be influenced by the environment one is raised in and currently lives in.
The propensity to help others is influenced by a combination of genetic predispositions and environmental factors. Research in behavioral genetics has shown that certain personality traits, such as empathy and agreeableness, which are associated with prosocial behavior, have a heritable component.
One of the key pieces of research supporting the role of genetics is the finding that heritability accounts for about 50% of the variance in prosocial behavior. This indicates that genetic factors contribute substantially to individual differences in helping behavior.
On the other hand, the other 50% of the variance is attributed to non-shared environmental factors, which include all environmental influences that are not shared by siblings in the same family, such as unique experiences, friendships, and personal life events.
A strong point that might be raised against the argument that genetics play a significant role is the phenomenon of situational influence. The presence of bystanders, the perceived cost of helping, and the degree of distress of the person in need can all dramatically affect whether an individual chooses to help.
To counter this argument, it is important to recognize that while situational factors can have a strong influence, they interact with an individual's genetic makeup. For instance, someone genetically predisposed to high empathy might be more sensitive to cues of distress and therefore more likely to help regardless of situational factors.
Find a practice partner who is an office worker or someone in your business, educational network, family or friend (indicate who it is in your paper). Take turns telling events from your lives. As you listen to your practice partner, sum up your practice partner’s overall experience (explain the background to the dialogue and their experience and feelings conveyed) in a 100-150-word writing. At the end of your writing, indicate why you believe your interpretation of their message required and utilized good listening skills. Support your answer from the text and peer reviewed sources.
Answer:
The chosen partner was a childhood friend.
Explanation:
My friend and I talked about the time when we were at a school extremely far from our home and we had to take several buses to get to school. Both he and I missed the bus schedule that took us back home constantly, which resulted in several adventures where both he and I spent the night wandering around until we found a way to get home or find shelter to spend in the evening.
The conversation was very nostalgic and gave me a feeling of accomplishment. It also gave me a sense of how fast time passes and that very conflicting situations from the past, turn into funny and fun memories today. I believe my friend felt the same things.
I believe that we passed on to each other a message of overcoming. That's because when I heard my friend's reports, I didn't feel that he was sad or embarrassed by these past issues, but that he was proud of how these things built the person he is today. I wouldn’t realize it if I weren’t a good listener.
Which of the following BEST describes how parents of teenagers must manage their children's growing quest for autonomy and control versus their own desire to remain connected and informed?
Parents engage in a delicate balancing act.
Parents occupy more of a peer position than a position of authority.
Parents maintain control as though in a military boot camp.
None of these; parents' roles change little throughout childhood and adolescence.
Answer; Parents engage in a delicate balancing act
Explanation: The life of a teenager seems to change daily. Before their teenage years, these adolescents focused on school, play, and always want to gain approval from their parents. But now, those goals are replaced with a desire for independence, as teenagers work toward becoming young adults. Parents on the other hand wants to always stand in the place of authority, wanting their children to always seek permissions from them like before.
At this stage however, parents and their teenage sons and daughters tends to have a whole lots of misunderstandings as both parties are finding it difficult to cope. Parents therefore are in a delicate position. They want to balance the position of authority with being friends with them.
Answer:B
Explanation:parent should occupy more of peer position than position of authority.. When this is done teenagers finds it easy to trust their parents just like their friends..
Consider again the election in question HW3, under the Borda Count method.a. Is there a Condorcet candidate in this election, and how can you tell?b.Does the result of this election under the Borda Countmethod violate the Condorcet Criterion? Explain briefly why or whynot.
Answer:
a)Not enough information
b)A Borda count election will likely violate the Condorcet Criterion. There usually is a Condorcet winner in a borda count election, however, this candidate will not be declared winner due to the point tally at the end of a borda count election.
Explanation:
The question fails to provide details of the election referenced in "question HW3". Notwithstanding, an attempt has been made to answer said question based on general principles
Borda count is a voting system in which voters rank the candidates in an order of preference. Points are given for the position of a candidate in a voter's rank order. The candidate with the most points wins.
The Borda count does not comply with the Condorcet criterion in the following case. Consider an election consisting of five voters and three alternatives, in which three voters prefer A to B and B to C, while two of the voters prefer B to C and C to A. The fact that A is preferred by three of the five voters to all other alternatives makes it a Condorcet Winner. However the Borda count awards 2 points for 1st choice, 1 point for second and 0 points for third. Thus, from three voters who prefer A, A receives 6 points (3 x 2), and 0 points from the other two voters, for a total of 6 points. B receives 3 points (3 x 1) from the three voters who prefer A to B to C, and 4 points (2 x 2) from the other two voters who prefer B to C to A. With 7 points, B is the Borda winner.
Answer:
a. yes there is a condorcet candidate in the election and is Ann. She defeated every other candidates in head to head competition.
b. The result does not violate the condorcet criterion.
Explanation:
based on the result of the election, Ann defeated every other candidates in the election head to head.
Ann vs. Bob:
11 + 6 = 17 voters rank Ann higher than Bob, while 7 + 8 + 1 = 16 voters rank Bob higher than Ann. Therefore Ann defeats Bob head to head, i.e. a majority of voters prefer Ann over Bob.
Ann vs. Claire:
11 + 6 = 17 voters rank Ann higher than Claire, while 7 + 8 + 1 = 16 voters rank Claire higher than Ann. Therefore Ann again defeats Claire head to head, i.e. a majority of voters prefer Ann over Claire. Claire is now out of the running to be a Condorcet candidate.
Ann vs. Dave:
7 + 8 + 6 = 21 voters rank Ann higher than Dave, while 11 + 1 = 12 voters rank Dave higher than Ann. Thus Ann defeats Dave head to head, i.e. a majority of voters prefer Ann over Dave. Behold!
Ann defeats all opponents in head to head competition, and is therefore a Condorcet candidate. According to the Condorcet criterion, Ann should win. [In general, in order to find out if a Condorcet candidate exists, we consider head to head competitions between candidates until a Condorcet candidate appears (because one candidate defeats all others head to head), or we find that there is none (because every candidate loses at least one head to head matchup). So Ann should win.
what does Malcolm X mean by the philosophy of “Black Nationalis
Answer:
Malcolm X declared that nonviolence was the "philosophy of the fool," and that to achieve anything, African Americans would have to reclaim their national identity, embrace the rights covered by the Second Amendment, and defend themselves from white hegemony and extrajudicial violence.
Explanation:
Black Nationalism is a political, social-economic philosophy that emerged in the early 19th century among black leaders who understood the need for Africans in America to develop a national entity and unity as the only solution for blacks in the African Diaspora, understood as North America, Latin America, the Caribbean and elsewhere with black people outside Africa, and thereby independently achieve social equality, economic development and policy governance within their own communities. Among the nationalists, there were those who believed in total separation and creation of an autonomous black nation or a return to Africa, as well as nationalists who believed that the black people were already a nation within another nation. Malcolm X represents very well the junction and unity of the different thoughts and paths of black nationalism, which he developed during his years of struggle, and summed up as follows.
Choose the best description of the barrier listed.
Psychological barriers
(a) We "tune out" others’ ideas that run counter to our own preconceived thoughts.
(b) We become bored because we can process thoughts three times faster than speakers can present them.
(c) We fail to listen because we are just waiting for the next pause when we get to speak.
The correct answer is (A) We "tune out" others’ ideas that run counter to our own preconceived thoughts.
Explanation:
In listening and understanding, a psychological barrier occurs as our beliefs, opinions, ideas, feelings, preconceptions and inner thoughts interrupt the process of listening, and therefore disrupt understanding. These barriers are unique in each person and due to this, these are one of the most difficult barriers to overcome as individuals need to be aware of their feelings, beliefs, etc. that prevent them from listening effectively and understanding.
According to this ideas, the statement that describes psychological barriers is "We "tune out" others’ ideas that run counter to our own preconceived thoughts" because psychological barriers include ideas or preconceived thoughts that stop us from listening effectively; and in this context, it is common we do not listen to speakers that show ideas or beliefs that are opposite from ours.
How would a psychoanalyst describe the therapeutic value of facing the original stressor that lead a person to suffer from posttraumatic stress disorder?
Answer:
It leads to an experience of catharsis, which is a relieving of emotional trauma
Explanation:
A psychoanalyst's aim would be to bring thoughts and feelings that have been buried to the conscious mind in order for these experiences to be examined. In this light, psychoanalyst believes that if the original stressor is examined, it can lead to an experience of catharsis, a feeling of relieving repressed emotion.
Although helping others with their problems is as old as human history, the idea of having a professional sit down and talk with a client in a counseling relationship dates from_____________.
Answer:
Late 1800's
Explanation:
Helping others with their problems is as old as human history, the idea of having a professional sit down and talk with a client in a counseling relationship dates from the late 1800's.
Helping others with their problems has been in existence for a very long period in which professionals sit down and talk to their client by counselling them in other to encourage the client thereby giving them a word of advice that will benefit them.
Forecasting models can be divided into three groups. They are: a. time series, optimization, and simulation methods b. judgmental, random, and linear methods c. linear, non-linear, and extrapolation methods d. judgmental, extrapolation, and econometric methods
Answer:
d. judgmental, extrapolation, and econometric methods
Explanation:
Forecasting models are tested frameworks or mathematical models that are used in predicting future outcomes and they are divided into three major groups; judgmental, extrapolation, and econometric methods.
Judgmental forecasting is employed when there is a lack of historical data, it incorporates intuitive judgement, opinions and subjective probability estimates. Extrapolation forecasting on the other hand is based on previously existing data, this type of forecasting asserts that previous trends from data will be replicated in the future.
The correct answer is letter D
As a demand request for auxiliary products and services as decision making, providing basic information for planning and controlling areas of an organization, such as, for example, finance and accounting, engineering and research, production, distribution and logistics, human resources, marketing.
If the forecast method is Calculation from the previous year, the demand forecast is identical to the Moving Average, except that the number of periods to be taken into account is different. Where: Average demand is calculated as: write-off of the actual item (previous period) / seasonal factor (previous period)
Elvira is an economic adviser who supports cultural policies that attempt to change people’s behavior to encourage development. She would most likely agree with which theory of global inequality?
Answer: dependency theory
Explanation:
dependency theory is based on a Marxist view of the world, which sees globalisation in terms of the spread of market capitalism, and the exploitation of cheap labour and resources in return for the obsolete technologies of the developed world. The dominant view of dependency theorists is that there is a dominant world capitalist system that relies on a division of labour between the rich ‘core’ countries and poor ‘peripheral’ countries. Over time, the core countries will exploit their dominance over an increasingly marginalised periphery.
Please state whether you find the arguments and beliefs of one side to be more persuasive than the other, and why. Please try to elaborate and use examples to make your point clear.
Hello. You forgot to add the required table for this question to be answered. The table is attached below:
Answer:
As you can see from the table below, the arguments and beliefs between federalists and republicans are very different and are present in the most varied points of society.
In the question above, it is requested that the most convincing side be chosen, however, it is impossible to generalize these two aspects and choose only one of them as the one that must be defended and followed. Both sides have convincing opinions, it is up to each individual to interpret which opinions fit with what each individual finds correct and fair for society.
However, it is important to point out that it is incorrect to be extremist and to adopt a side as the supreme owner of the truth. This is because both federalists and republicans have very serious flaws, as well as convincing opinions.
John McCormick describes and analyzes Liberal Democracies. His description includes a comparative analysis of different types of democracies-elite v. group or pluralist. My question is, which of the theories of democracy seems most compelling when applied to the British and American systems: elitism, pluralism, or perhaps a combination of the two?
Answer:
Pluralism with a touch of elitism
Explanation:
Classical pluralism learns us that, although politics are made mostly in the framework of government, non-governmental groups do exercise certain amount of influence in the decision making of a country. So we can say that British and American systems follow pluralistic roads but...
... we cannot deny a certain influence of Elite groups in both countries, probably more present in the U.S. than in England. I personally remember that Hillary Clinton for example was judged too elitarian, in the meaning that she represented (and defended) a elite and very powerful minority.
Final answer:
The theories of democracy most compelling when applied to the British and American systems are a combination of elitism and pluralism. While pluralism underscores interest group competition, elitism reflects concentration of power in a few hands. Both systems display traits indicative of democratic liberalism, balancing individual rights with representation.
Explanation:
When analyzing democratic systems, particularly those in the British and American contexts, elitism and pluralism offer compelling theories of democracy. Pluralism highlights the role of competing interest groups in ensuring representation. However, it overlooks the uneven levels of influence among these groups, with entities like the National Rifle Association and the American Medical Association often wielding disproportionate sway. In contrast, elitism suggests power resides with a few, be they economic, governmental, or military leaders, or even among a select socioeconomic class.
Considering the British parliamentary democracy and the American presidential system, elements of both theories are observable. The US political ideology spectrum, characterized by a range from liberal to conservative views, along with voter apathy, suggests a complex interplay wherein elite interests could dominate despite the pluralist structure.
Within the British context, the presence of the monarchy, albeit ceremonial, and the consolidation of power within a parliamentary elite may also reflect elitist tendencies, alongside a pluralist system where multiple parties compete for influence.
Democratic liberalism has emerged as an ideology that merges capitalism and individual rights with democratic principles, defending minority rights against potential majoritarian aggression. This ideology underpins both the British and American systems, which are essentially representative democracies balancing power across various branches and safeguarding individual liberties.
Western culture in the period 1300–1550 more: the Black Death’s emphasis on the afterlife (the hereafter) or the Renaissance’s emphasis on human achievement (the here and now)? Choose one of these and explain your perspective. Start with a statement identifying your choice; this is your thesis. Then, support your choice with specific examples from at least three of the following categories: significant individuals (e.g., political or religious leaders, innovators, explorers); characteristics of worldview (e.g., philosophy, religion); social institutions (e.g., social mores, practices, hierarchies); patronage (discuss the patrons, their motives, influence, and resulting products or artifacts); the economies (e.g., changes, different economic systems, impact); and politics (e.g., forms of governance, power distributions, contests).
One of the most significant contributions of Western culture to the world during these years is that of the Renaissance. The Renaissance was a new artistic, philosophical, and political movement that changed the way in which Europe thought about itself and the world. The Renaissance emphasized the importance of the individual, and that of human experience, as opposed to the afterlife. This led to the study of humanity and human experience. An example of a Renaissance thinker is Leonardo da Vinci. Da Vinci studied humanity with an anatomical and physiological approach. However, he also looked at humanity from an artistic and emotional perspective. Many artists and thinkers such as Da Vinci were only able to complete their work due to the support of patrons. Patrons were wealthy people who invested their money in financing the works of artists, thinkers and other people of talent.
It has been determined that John receives social reinforcers each time he shouts in class. The teacher wants to use a DRA procedure.
What would be an appropriate alternative behavior?
Answer:
The appropriate alternative behavior would be for John to be silent in the classroom.
Explanation:
DRA procedure is a term used to describe the set of techniques that seek to reduce undesirable behavior that happens frequently in a given individual, by exchanging undesirable behavior for an alternative and desirable behavior. The main objective, in this case, is to end or reduce the incidence of problematic, irritating behaviors that have bad results.
In the case shown in the question above, the DRA procedure can be used to make John quiet in the classroom, instead of shouting.
Answer: The appropriate alternative behavior, will be the use of "SOCIAL REINFORCEMENT WHENEVER HE IS TALKING QUIETLY".
Explanation: DRA means Differential Reinforcement of Alternative behavior. It is the process of reducing a behavior by reinforcing an alternative behavior.
Because John receives social reinforcement whenever he shouts, the alternative behavior to John's shouting is talking quietly. Therefore if DRA is to be used on John, the appropriate way is to reinforce his alternative behavior.
Social reinforcement is the use of incentives or praises to increase the occurrence of a behavior in an individual.
Before deregulation, government agencies frequently: Held prices artificially high, shielding businesses from competition. Held prices artificially low, shielding consumers from selection. Encouraged overseas trade, shielding businesses from competition. Discouraged overseas trade, shielding consumers from selection.
Answer:
Held prices artificially high, shielding businesses from competition.
Explanation:
Deregulation can be defined as the reduction or total removal of government power and influence in a particular industry, generally enacted to allow more competition within major and minor players in that industry. Over the years the great efforts among proponents of government intervention and proponents of no government influence or regulation have shifted market conditions.
The FTC controls on product comparisons: a. no longer exist. b. are a high regulatory priority. c. are very stringent. d. have changed dramatically with private enforcement.
Answer: D
Have changed dramatically with private enforcement
Explanation:
The Federal trade commission (FTC) is an independent agency of the United States government. It's principal responsibility is to enforce the provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits "unfair or deceptive acts or practices in commerce." FTC permits and even encourages product comparisons, but such comparisons must be accurate so as not to confuse the populace.
In the 1997 Reno v. ACLU case, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously voted to strike down the anti-indecency provisions of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) because they violated the: a. freedom of speech provisions of the First Amendment. b. Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. c. self-defense provisions of the Second Amendment. d. Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Answer:
a. freedom of speech provisions of the First Amendment.
Explanation:
In the 1997 Reno v. ACLU case, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously voted to strike down the anti-indecency provisions of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) because they violated the freedom of speech provisions of the First Amendment. The judgement states that anti-indecency provisions of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) over contents on the internet violates the First Amendment, and that while the government has the obligation to protect minors from indecent speech, it should not prevent adults to access to free speech.
_____ are unconscious, taken-for-granted perceptions or ideal prototypes of behavior that are considered the correct way to think and act toward problems and opportunities.
Answer:
Shared assumptions.
Explanation:
As per the question, 'shared assumptions' are demonstrated as the 'unconscious and presupposed perceptions or the prefect prototypes of the behavior that are regarded as the appropriate way to think about a particular problem or opportunity or act in such situations.' These are the basis of any organizational culture as they form the common base of perceptions, behaviors, or beliefs that are shared by almost every member part of the culture. These beliefs or assumptions are so deeply embedded that they have been taken-for-granted and remain unnoticed despite being an inherent part of the culture.
c. Choose two countries that appear to be culturally diverse to you. Compare the cultures of those countries, and then indicate how cultural differences influence • the costs of doing business in each country • the likely future economic development of that country • business practices
Explanation:
The response depends on the students who chose the country. It depends on the knowledge of student's knowledge about the country. There are different dimensions on the bases a student can get some information about the country such as ethics, norms, culture, religion, language, and education in the country. The students can describe the similarities and differences of the country based on social norms, language, religion, etc. These differences help students to understand the dimension of the business and the potential of economic development.
Thus in the above statement, different dimensions can describe the culture, religion of a country. Students can understand the culture of a different country.
Final answer:
The United States and India offer examples of culturally diverse countries affecting the costs of doing business, future economic development, and business practices. American culture values individualism, efficiency, and directness, impacting operational costs and business approaches. Indian culture emphasizes collectivism, relationships, and flexibility, influencing negotiation processes and partnership dynamics.
Explanation:
To compare two culturally diverse countries, let's take the United States and India as examples. American culture highly values individualism and has a more linear approach to business, focusing on punctuality, privacy, and directness in communication. In contrast, Indian culture places a higher emphasis on collectivism and relationship-building, with a more flexible approach to time and a communication style that often seeks to maintain harmony.
The cost of doing business in each country is influenced by these cultural differences. In the United States, punctuality and efficiency are key, potentially leading to higher costs due to the need for prompt delivery and quick turnarounds. Regulations and legal structures also tend to be strict, affecting operational costs. In India, establishing trust and rapport can be crucial before entering into negotiations or partnerships, which may lengthen the time to close deals but can also lead to more reliable partnerships and potentially lower transaction costs in the long-term.
Looking at future economic development, the United States is continuing to advance in technology and services, maintaining its position as a postindustrial economy. India, with its booming tech industry and large skilled workforce, is also progressing rapidly, though it still contends with large income disparities and infrastructure challenges.
When it comes to business practices, American companies often emphasize results and achievements in their leadership styles and reward systems, while Indian companies may place more value on team dynamics and group success. Leaders in India might be expected to be more paternalistic and status-conscious than their American counterparts.
While working on a puzzle with his 3-year-old daughter, Jon demonstrates how to put the outside pieces of the puzzle together first, followed by matching up the puzzle shapes and colors. After his daughter observes for a bit, she begins to pick up pieces and tries to match them together. When she appears confused or looks to her father, Jon points to where the piece should go. Jon’s modeling and support illustrate Vygotsky’s concept of __
Answer:
Scaffolding
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
guided imagerymetacognitionscaffoldingcultural transmissionThis illustrates the concept of scaffolding. Scaffolding is a learning method in which learners learn by collaborating with others in a particular activity. The instructor, parent or peer who works with the learner functions as a "scaffolding," as he allows the learner to expand his or her knowledge beyond what he or she would have normally known. It allows the person to develop his zone of proximal development. This is the knowledge that a person might not have on his own, but that can be developed with help and guidance.
Answer:
Scaffolding
Explanation:
Lev Vygotsky was a psychologist who developed a theory on cognitive development on children based on learning that was made through observation, practice and help of models.
The term Scaffolding refers to the process by which kids learn by being helped by more advanced peers or adults. These people help the kid by giving them guidance when they are working on a task and by showing them how it's done, then, by observation, the children learn faster and also, they receive help when they get stuck, using this method, kids learn abilities faster than those who don't receive any help and learn totally by themselves.
In this example, Jon is working with his 3-year-old daughter and he demonstrates how to put the outside pieces of the puzzled together first, first, she observes and then she starts to do the same thing his father is doing, when she gets stuck, her father is there to help her and point to where the piece should go. We can see that Jon's daughter is learning how to solve a puzzle by receiving help and guidance from him and also getting help when she is stuck. Therefore, this would illustrate Vygotsky's concept of scaffolding.
Once a month, Morgan buys a case of wine. She will either buy the Charles Shaw brand, the Livingston brand, or the Sutter Home brand because she knows that these three brands are inexpensive and tasty. She considers only these three options when selecting her wine. For Morgan, the three brands of wine are a(n):
Answer: An evoked set
Explanation: An evoked set is defined as alternatives that a consumer considers before making a decision concerning purchase. They are a set of brands that comes to a consumer's mind when s/he thinks of purchasing a product. They are the group of brands most likely to be purchased by consumers. In order to judge the features and benefits of her evoked set, Morgan uses "inexpensive and taste" as standards.
The goal of all marketers is for their brand to be part of an evoked set which has been narrowed down from a total and awareness set.
Answer:
An evoked set
Explanation:
Evoked set is a set of brands that comes to a consumer’s mind when he thinks of purchasing a product. Morgan only thinks or considers only these options of three brands when she buys a case of wine, which is Charles Shaw, Livingston or the Sutter. It really doesnt matter if these brands are inexpensive or expensive or tasty or not tasty. As far as Morgan selects these set. These set of brands is known as an evoked set
"Preston Electronics is an MNE with facilities located in Taiwan, Singapore, and Germany. Preston gives its local operations the authority to adapt value activities to prevailing local economic, political, legal, and cultural conditions. Preston is most likely using a(n) ________ strategy."
Answer:
Multidomestic strategy
Explanation:
A multidomestic strategy is an international marketing approach that chooses to focus advertising and commercial efforts on the needs of a local market rather than taking a more universal or global approach.
Answer: multidomestic strategy
Explanation: multidomestic is a term used to describe strategies used by companies that operate in more than one country at a time. Multidomestic strategy is a strategy which companies use to achieve maximum local sensitivity by modifying both their product and marketing strategy to match different national conditions.
A procedure used by some qualitative researchers involving sending the findings to participants to get their feedback on the content and accuracy of the research report, is called _____. Group of answer choices
Answer:
Member check
Explanation:
Member checking is a qualitative technique that is used to establish the truth of the research study’s findings. It also means a process that shows that the findings of a particular research are accurate and truthful.
Member checking also involves the process of getting and sharing the entire findings of the study with the research participants.
Member checking is the foundation to establishing trustworthiness with the participants of the research.
Andrea is an infant who lives in a house with parents who fight all the time and are contemplating divorce. She is exposed to frequent displays of anger. What can we predict about Andrea’s emotional regulation?
Answer:
Andrea is going to have difficulties regulating her emotions. She would be very affected and sensible to stressed situations, and she may have difficulties managing anger and other displays of emotions.
Explanation:
A child's family background normally affects children emotional responses. If Andrea or any other child is sourrounded by emotional stress and anger, she would be affected by it and it would cause her to have difficulties learning how to relgulate her own emotions.
The replacement of Sandra Day O'Connor with Samuel Alito was significant because a. Alito is far more conservative than O'Connor.b. Alito is far more moderate than O'Connor.c. Alito is much more inclined to support 1st Amendment rights than O'Connor.d. Alito is much stronger on states rights than O'Connor.
Answer:
a. Alito is far more conservative than O'Connor
Explanation:
The change is significant because O'Connor was a moderate Republican, while Alito is considered by many one of the most conservative justices on the Court. Therefore, it is fair to state that Alito is far more conservative than O'Connor.
The answer is alternative a.
Answer: The correct answer is a). Alito is far more conservative than O'Connor
Explanation: Sandra Day O'Connor was the first female justice of thw supreme court in 1981. Upom her retirement, she was replaces woth Samuel Alito.
The replacement was significant because O'Connor was seen as a moderate conservative having a pragmatic approach. However, her replacement Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., who was more conservative.
The legislators of New State institute a law that mothers of children in elementary school, but not fathers, are entitled to seven days off each year in order to attend school events. Several fathers bring a lawsuit challenging the law on equal protection grounds. Which level of scrutiny will the court apply to the law?
Answer: Intermediate Scrutiny
Explanation:
According to Constitutional law, INTERMEDIATE SCRUTINY refers to a test used to determine the constitutionality of a law in some specific contexts. It stands as the second level of deciding issues using judicial review.
Intermediate scrutiny is used in equal protection challenges to gender classifications and cases involving government interference on right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression.
Therefore, intermediate scrutiny will be applied by the court to the fathers lawsuit, because the law's classification scheme is based on equal protection challenges to gender classifications.
Two friends attribute their high math scores to their high level of effort and ability in math and their low Spanish scores to their teacher's subjective grading and favoritism.
In this situation, these students are exhibiting:
A) the actor-observer effect
B) the hindsight bias
C) scapegoating
D) equity
E) the self-serving bias
Answer:
E) the self-serving bias
Explanation:
The self-serving bias refers to people's inclination to attribute positive events or positive outcomes to their own character but attribute the negative events to external factors. It's a regular type of cognitive bias that has been broadly studied in social psychology.
For example; a student obtains a good grade on a test or positive exam results and tells himself that he studied hard or is good at that particular subject. He gets a bad grade on another test or gets a negative exam results and says the teacher doesn't like him or the test was unfair.
When Athletes win a game they attribute their win to hard work and practice, while when they lose they attribute the loss to some external factors beyond their control.
Geraldine Fadsi's job in the entertainment industry is to bring together entertainers and organizations looking to hire entertainers. Fadsi is paid a commission, usually by the entertainer. Fadsi is acting as a:
Answer: Agent
Explanation: An agent is a person who has been legally authorized to act in the interests of another person in an industry or an organization. Since Fadsi is paid commission by the entertainer's, Fadsi is acting as an Agent in the entertainment industry.
Geraldine Fadsi is operating as a talent agent or booking agent in the entertainment industry, working to secure gigs for entertainers and earning a commission, typically from the entertainer, for her services.
Explanation:Geraldine Fadsi's job in the entertainment industry is typically referred to as a talent agent or booking agent. This role involves identifying potential gigs for entertainers, negotiating contracts, and ensuring that both the hiring organizations and the entertainers' needs are met. Fadsi's commission-based payment structure is common in this industry, providing an incentive to secure the best opportunities for entertainers, and thereby earning higher commissions.
Learn more about Talent Agent here:https://brainly.com/question/36443918
#SPJ3