What were the planks of Andrew Jackson’s campaign platform in 1828?

During the Protestant Reformation, Martin Luther and John Calvin called for reforms to the Catholic Church, including the publication of the Bible in everyday language, criticism of tithes, and denouncement of indulgences. Luther emphasized faith alone for salvation and the authority of scripture, while Calvin focused on predestination and a disciplined Christian society.

Answer:

non-property-owning men

Explanation:

After the American revolution, there was a rise of political parties and with it an expansion of voting rights for white men. After the war was over, many states retained some property requirements for one to vote, as a way to prevent poor people from voting.

At that time, Republicans believed that citizens were required to have an economic stake in society in order to be trusted to vote wisely. If a voter did not have economic independence, the voter would be manipulated to vote in a certain party.

But with the construction of many industries, laborers started to get money and buy things. Because of that, economic status disappeared as a foundation for citizenship and by 1840 90% of adult white men could vote.

E) None of the above. The benjaminites and the Levite’s were actually tribes of the nation of Israel, so they couldn’t oppose themselves. The midianites and the moabites were neighbors of the Israelites, and traded with them on a regular basis. Thus, they weren’t really enemies.

the correct answer is option C.The number of immigrants entering the United States has varied over time, reflecting the diverse and changing patterns of immigration. These immigrants have contributed to American culture as they experienced assimilation, faced challenges, and affected the nation's identity and policies.

When examining the history of American immigration, the most accurate statement is that the number of immigrants entering the United States has varied over time. Immigration has been a significant source of population growth and cultural change, with different periods bringing a variety of national groups, ethnicities, and races to America. The concept of the United States as a cultural melting pot arises from the assimilation of immigrants into American society, where they learned English and adopted American customs, although this notion is nuanced by ongoing debates about multiculturalism and the best approach to integration.Historically, America has seen waves of immigration from various regions, including Western and Northern Europe, Eastern Europe, Latin America, and Asia, in addition to the forced immigration of enslaved Africans. Each wave of immigrants has faced challenges, including prejudice and discrimination, before assimilating and contributing to the multifaceted American culture. Contemporary U.S. society is multicultural, multiracial, and multiethnic, composed of individuals from numerous national origins, and this diversity shapes the nation's identity and policies such as the DREAM Act and DACA aim to provide pathways for undocumented immigrants, especially those who arrived as children.

The most accurate statement regarding U.S. immigration is that the number of immigrants has varied over time, contributing to cultural changes in American society. Assimilation has not been an easy path for all, and the ethnic mix of the population has continuously evolved, contrary to the options suggesting unchanged ethnic composition or most immigrants coming from Canada.

This variation in immigration has contributed to the growth and continual change of the American population's cultural dynamics. Not all immigrants have easily assimilated into American society, as the process of assimilation can sometimes involve extended periods of prejudice and discrimination. The ethnic mix of the American population has been changing and evolving, particularly noticeable during significant waves of immigration. While Canada and the United States both attract immigrants, it is not accurate to say that most immigrants to the United States come from Canada. In fact, recent immigration waves to the U.S. have been primarily from countries in Asia and Latin America.

The history of immigration to the United States has seen people from Western Europe, Northern Europe, Eastern Europe, Latin America, Asia, and the forced immigration of enslaved Africans. Throughout this history, immigrants have tended to settle in areas with others from similar backgrounds, creating a multicultural, multiracial, and multiethnic society. Key legislation such as the DREAM Act and DACA aims to support and integrate immigrants, especially those who arrive as children. The idea of the U.S. as a cultural melting pot has arisen because many immigrants have learned English and assimilated into the mainstream culture, blending their unique cultural identities into a more homogeneous national culture.

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

Answer:

yes it is true

Explanation:

Answer:

C

Explanation:

EDG2020

The correct answer is C. Hessian

Explanation:

During the 18th century, the thirteen colonies that were under the rule fo the British Empire won their independence by beginning a revolt known as the American Rebellion defeating Great Britain military forces during the American Revolutionary War in 1783 and later establishing an independent nation. During this conflict and as an attempt to end with the American Rebellion the colonies Great Britain did not only involve English soldiers but also hired German soldiers called Hessians that support the actions of the British Army; indeed it is estimated around 30,000 German soldier or Hessians participated before and during the American Revolutionary War; additionally, the use of German soldiers only caused the colonies to oppose more strongly the British Parliament and Army. Considering this, it can be concluded the term used to describe German soldiers hired by Great Britain to put down the American Rebellion was Hessians.

Jimmy Carter's foreign policy was highlighted by an emphasis on human rights, the successful return of the Panama Canal, and the Camp David Accords that led to a peace agreement between Israel and Egypt.

One of his major achievements in this area was the emphasis on human rights, which led to the reduction or elimination of aid to dictatorships with poor human rights records in countries like South Korea, Argentina, and the Philippines. Carter also managed to negotiate the return of the Panama Canal to Panama and orchestrated the historic Camp David Accords, which led to a peace treaty between Israel and Egypt, marking the first time an Arab state recognized Israel and agreed to Palestinian self-government. Despite some criticisms and challenges such as the Iran hostage crisis, these accomplishments highlight significant successes in Carter’s foreign policy endeavors.

Answer:

containment will be the answer for this question !

The containment was the policy of trying to limit the expansion of Soviet influence abroad. Thus, option (b) is correct.

A “policy” can be a rule, practice, administrative decision, directive, or framework in a government or other institution. the policy was the based on the policy are the company to follow the employees. The policy was the affected on the internal and the external. The policy are the compulsory to the follow.

During the year 1947, President Harry S. Truman was in office. The Truman Doctrine is his policy of containment. The policy of "containment" was devised by a Foreign Service Officer. Containment was the United States' geopolitical strategic foreign strategy during the Cold War to prevent the spread of communism after WWII.

As a result, the containment was the policy of trying to limit the expansion of Soviet influence abroad. Therefore, option (b) is correct.

Learn more about on policy, here:

https://brainly.com/question/28024313

#SPJ5

Answer:

In 1929, Albert Fall was convicted of bribery while holding the position of Secretary of the Interior.

Explanation:

Albert Fall was an American politician. Member of the Republican Party, he was Senator of New Mexico between 1912 and 1921 and Secretary of the Interior between 1921 and 1923 in the administration of President Warren G. Harding. In this post, he was involved in the Teapot Dome scandal and became the first member of a US government sentenced to prison for a misconduct when he was a minister.

Albert Fall was convicted of bribery in 1929 while he was the Secretary of the Interior, due to his involvement in the Teapot Dome Scandal.

In 1929, Albert Fall was convicted of bribery while holding the position of Secretary of the Interior. He was implicated in the infamous Teapot Dome Scandal, involving the leasing of the US Navy's oil reserves at Teapot Dome, Wyoming, to private oil companies without a competitive bidding process. In return, Fall received significant bribes in the form of cash, bonds, and even cattle for his ranch. Fall's conviction marked the first time a U.S. Cabinet official was sentenced to prison for crimes committed while in office.

Answer:

The ancient Egyptian civilization was greatly impacted by the Black land.Basically, the ancient Egypt was based on the river Nile. The civilization formed on the bank of river Nile. Because the annual flooding of the river used to bring a ton of fertile layer of soil which was very much needed for the agriculture.

However, the black land was the soil and land along the bank of river Nile .Especially after the flood of Nile in each year the soil used to get extremely fertile which helped the ancient Egyptians for setting up their civilization on the bank of Nile through the agriculture.The black land was named as the soil after getting rid of flood water used get black color containing the natural fertilizer.

On the other hand the red land was comparatively barren and hard for growing crops.As a result the civilization was sustained on the "Black Land" of the Nile.

Therefore, it can be said that the Black Land had a great contribute to the civilization of Ancient Egypt bu helping them to the agriculture and building the civilization.

Explanation:

In the eastern part of the confederacy, the Army of the Protomac met with mixed success. The Union Army failed to capture Richmond and won at Antietam only because the Confederates withdrew from the field first. In the western part of the Confederacy, the Army of the West won the Battle of Shiloh, and the Union navy captured New Orleans and Memphis.

Legislative leaders act as gatekeepers controlling legislative flow, coalition builders uniting party members, and communicators liaising with various stakeholders. All roles are vital, but the role of a coalition builder might be the most important as consensus is crucial for legislation to pass. Gatekeeping, which directs the legislative agenda, is also vital, while communication supports the other roles.

Legislative leaders serve multiple roles including acting as gatekeepers, coalition builders, and communicators. As gatekeepers, they largely control the flow of legislation through the process of drafting and amending bills. They wield influence over which bills are prioritized and have the power to either push forward or quash legislation.

As coalition builders, they must foster unity among party members and gather support for various legislative initiatives. This role is crucial in passing bills that align with their party's agenda.

Furthermore, as communicators, legislative leaders keep their constituents informed about legislative work and liaise with various interest groups, lobbyists, fellow legislators, and the executive branch. They must also represent their constituents, taking their views into account when formulating and voting on legislation.

In terms of importance, all three roles are crucial for different reasons. However, one could argue that the role of a coalition builder is most vital, as without consensus and agreement within a party, passing legislation becomes extremely challenging.

This is followed by the role of a gatekeeper, as they control the legislative agenda. The role of a communicator, although essential, can be seen as complementary to the other roles.

https://brainly.com/question/34499854

#SPJ12

Legislative leaders act as gatekeepers that control policy progress, coalition builders that unite different factions and interests, and communicators that articulate the party's policy positions and legislative goals. While all three roles are crucial, coalition builders, gatekeepers, and communicators are ranked in decreasing order of importance due to the essential nature of unity, control over policy progress, and persuasive communication respectively.

Legislative leaders fulfill major roles such as gatekeepers, coalition builders, and communicators. As gatekeepers, legislative leaders control the flow of legislation; they decide which bills come up for debate and which don't. In essence, they act as a filter that the majority of proposed legislation must pass through, shaping policy directions by enabling or blocking progress.

As coalition builders, legislative leaders seek to build support among legislators for their party's policies. They have to negotiate, convince, and manage different factions and interests to maintain unity, particularly during votes.

As communicators, legislative leaders play a crucial role in delivering the party's message to their legislative peers, the press, and the public. They are expected to articulate their party's policy positions and legislative goals clearly and persuasively.

In terms of importance, while all three roles are pivotal, I would rank them as follows: 1) Coalition builders, 2) Gatekeepers, and 3) Communicators. This is because, without a solid coalition, little can be achieved even if choices are controlled or communication is excellent. Gatekeeper comes second as they control which policies see the light of day, hence shaping the legislative agenda. Communicators, while essential, are third to the essential roles of coalition building and gatekeeping.

https://brainly.com/question/34499854

#SPJ12

Answer:

The correct answer choice for the question: Which of the following is not an item Europeans introduced to Indians, would be: A: Wampum.

Explanation:

A wampum is defined as a shell bead that was usually crafted by American Indians from the Eastern tribes. These beads were created by the Indians from other shells that could be found on the land and they were used particularly in strings, which were then used during storytelling and also to keep records of important events. These were also used as forms of exchange systems between tribes and they could also be gifted to others during certain rituals and ceremonies.

Wampum, sacred shell beads, was not introduced to Native Americans by Europeans. It was a significant part of Native American cultures prior to European contact. Glass beads, copper kettles, and metal tools, however, were introduced by Europeans.

Among the items listed, wampum is the item that was not introduced to Native Americans (often referred as Indians) by Europeans. Wampum are traditional, sacred shell beads of the Eastern Woodlands tribes of the indigenous people in North America. While glass beads, copper kettles, and metal tools were all products brought by Europeans during their exploration and colonization periods, wampum served as a significant component in Native American cultures and economies for centuries before European contact.

https://brainly.com/question/18070813

#SPJ3

The correct answer is D. The Tet Offensive.

Explanation

Tet's offensive was a military offensive that took place during the Vietnam War, planned and executed by North Vietnam and its army against the coalition forces led by South Vietnam and the United States. Particularly, this offensive did not have positive results for North Vietnam, because it meant human and territorial losses, nevertheless, it is considered as a tactical victory because due to this incident people in the United States refused to persist in the war due to the great loss of around fourteen thousand American soldiers. This change in perception was significant for the subsequent defeat of the coalition and the victory of North Vietnam. So, the correct answer is the Tet offensive.

Final answer:

The Tet Offensive was the event that led many Americans to doubt that the Vietnam War could be won. This coordinated attack throughout South Vietnam shocked the American public and media, revealing weaknesses in U.S. military claims and turning public opinion firmly against the war, leading to increased calls for withdrawal and peace negotiations.

Explanation:

The Tet Offensive and American Public Opinion

Many Americans began to doubt that the war in Vietnam could be won following the Tet Offensive. This massive simultaneous attack on major cities across South Vietnam, including the capital Saigon, shocked the American public and revealed that, despite previous optimistic claims by the U.S. government, the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong forces were still capable of mounting large-scale operations. The surprise and scope of the attack, along with the graphic media coverage, fueled a significant shift in public opinion in the United States against the war. The perception that the U.S. military was not winning and the growing 'credibility gap' between official statements and the reality on the ground led to increased calls for withdrawal and peace talks.

Media response to the Tet Offensive also played a critical role in shaping public opinion. Prominent journalists and news outlets began to openly question the war effort, with statements like Walter Cronkite's declaring that the rational way out of Vietnam was negotiation. The aftermath of Tet saw increasing numbers of Americans believing that intervention in Vietnam was a mistake, further exacerbating the opposition to the conflict. The event ultimately contributed to President Johnson's decision to initiate peace talks with the North.

The Tet Offensive was both a military and psychological turning point in the Vietnam War, leading to significant changes in American sentiments towards the conflict. While U.S. forces eventually repelled the attacks and inflicted heavy casualties, the political impact in the U.S. was profound, with many Americans concluding that the war might be unwinnable and questioning the continued presence of American soldiers in Vietnam.

The correct answer is D) They cause significant changes that disrupt the equilibrium of the earth and lead to natural separation points.

The catastrophic events related to changes in geological timelines cause significant changes that disrupt the equilibrium of the earth and lead to natural separation points.

Historians and scientists use catastrophic events because they mark the end of an era and the beginning of a new epoch in the history of humanity. Earthquakes and floods, even meteorites, have changed the face of the Earth and its inhabitants, in most of the case the animal life on the planet. We are referring to the extinction of the dinosaurs, or glaciers melt that covered many sites, and other kinds of catastrophes that science used them as a natural separation point.  

Answer:

B.

Explanation:

the geological time scale is basically just a 'Earth' dating system. geo-scientists use it to keep track of Earths geological/crusty/rocky events.

couldnt be 'A' because thats talking about geopolitical changes

cant be 'C' cause thats talking about a whole nother type of system called the geologic temperature record

'D' is talking about planetary equilibrium, that has to do with energy balance and radiation and the atmosphere and blah blah blah its not the right answer

the question was about geology and the only answer about basic geology is B. They define geological periods because scientists use them as reference points for tracking the history of the earth.

Americans developed a widespread fear of Communist infiltration into the American government or of an anarchist or communist revolution that could overthrow the prevailing capitalist order in the United States by imposing a Communist dictatorship, just as in the USSR. This diffuse dread gave way to aggressive investigations and the arrest of people ideologically suspicious or otherwise associated with communist or socialist movements. At that moment, the citizens would become distrustful and afraid of being denounced as a communist sympathizer because that would imply in being persecuted by the government and having their civic guarantees withdrawn.

The fear of the Soviet Union and communism shaped American society, fueling the Second Red Scare and Lavender Scare, affecting civil liberties, and driving military spending and propaganda. These fears led to discrimination and targeted individuals and groups within American culture and politics.

This period saw the onset of the Second Red Scare, where individuals suspected of Communist affiliations faced severe scrutiny and oftentimes unjust persecution. As the United States entered an arms race against the Soviet Union, the threat of nuclear war influenced American foreign policy, and the need to maintain superiority led to significant investments in military technology, shaping the national budget and economy.

During this time, there was also a significant impact on civil liberties as the Lavender Scare implicated and targeted homosexuals, alleging that their sexual orientation made them security risks. This discrimination had lasting effects on the Gay Rights Movement. In popular culture, the fear of communism infiltrated various aspects, from films to educational materials, often portraying the Soviet Union as an oppressive regime.

The American government approached these fears with heavy propaganda and policies aimed to root out communist influence, sometimes at the expense of civil liberties and social cohesion. The panic instilled by the fear of communist espionage and influence also led to actions that infringed upon the civil rights of many Americans, as seen in the activities of the House Un-American Activities Committee.

Ronald Reagan was originally a liberal Democrat before he shifted to conservative Republicanism. After formally changing parties in 1962, he supported conservative causes, campaigned for Barry Goldwater, and introduced Reaganomics as President, significantly influencing the direction of American politics.

Before becoming a conservative Republican, Ronald Reagan was a liberal Democrat. Initially, Reagan was aligned with liberal Democratic politics but shifted his views due to his dislike of communism and the influence of his second wife, Nancy Davis, who was inclined towards social conservative values. His role as President of the Screen Actors Guild exposed him to disputes over Communism in the film industry, which also influenced his move toward conservatism.

In 1962, Reagan formally switched political parties and became a Republican. By 1964, he was actively campaigning for the Republican presidential nominee Barry Goldwater. Reagan's transformation from a liberal Democrat to a conservative Republican culminated in his election as Governor of California and eventually the President of the United States, heralding the era of Reaganomics and significant shifts in American social and economic policies.

As president, Reagan implemented policies that aimed to stimulate the economy by reducing the size of the federal government, cutting social program spending, and providing tax relief for the wealthy. While these policies had mixed results, they were key to the formation and rise of the New Right, a conservative movement that influenced the trajectory of American politics.

1. The impact that the Europeans had o the New World in their early explorations was mostly negative. The Europeans were treating the natives very badly. Several diseases quickly spread around a big portion of the native populations died out. The greed from the Europeans for wealth, especially gold and silver, led to wars and battles with the natives, with he end result being the destruction of the most developed civilizations of the Americas.

2. The impact of the New World on the Europeans was mostly good, with slight negativity. The negative part was the spreading out of few diseases which affected solid number of Europeans and turned out to be fatal for them, but on a large scale. The positives were seen in the large amounts of gold and silver, later platinum as well, that were obtained by the Europeans from the New World. Also, lot of new crops were introduced in Europe, some of which, like the potato, had a huge positive impact and mostly solved the malnutrition problem which was common prior to its introduction.

The early European explorations led to massive changes in the New World, including the decimation of Indigenous populations and the establishment of European systems. In contrast, Europe significantly benefited from this contact through economic wealth, new goods, and intellectual progress.

The impact of early European explorations on the New World was transformative. It led to the widespread loss of Indigenous populations due to disease and violence, significant environmental changes, and the Transatlantic Slave Trade.

Many Indigenous societies were replaced with European systems of political, religious, and social organization.

On the other hand, the impact of the New World on Europeans was equally profound. The advent of new goods such as tomatoes, potatoes, maize, and tobacco changed the European diet and economy.

Furthermore, the arrival of gold and silver from the New World substantially boosted Europe’s wealth and financed the growth of numerous empires, making the continent a dominant global player. The discoveries also sparked intellectual interest leading to the Age of Enlightenment.

https://brainly.com/question/34194529

#SPJ3

Answer: Weeks before Clinton took office, outgoing-President George H. W. Bush had sent American troops into Somalia, a country located in eastern Africa. What started out as a humanitarian mission to combat famine grew into a bloody military struggle, with the bodies of dead American soldiers dragged through the streets of the Somalian capital of Mogadishu in October 1993. Public support for the American mission waned, and Clinton announced a full withdrawal of U.S. forces, which took place in March 1994; United Nations (UN) peacekeeping troops remained in the country until the spring of 1995. The intervention ultimately accomplished little in Somalia: warlords remained in control, and no functioning government was restored in the country after the United States and the United Nations left. The failure of American troops to be properly equipped for the mission led ultimately to the resignation of Secretary of Defense Les Aspin and created the impression of a President ill-prepared for foreign affairs.

In April 1994, a vast killing spree broke out in Rwanda, a nation located in central Africa. An estimated 800,000 Tutsi and their defenders were murdered in a government-sponsored genocide. With the failure in Somalia still very much in the minds of American policymakers, neither the United States nor the United Nations moved aggressively to stop the slaughter. Both Clinton and the world community were criticized for not acting quickly and decisively to stop the violent deaths of Rwandans. In 1998, the Clintons embarked on an extensive six-nation tour of Africa, during which the President stopped briefly in Rwanda to meet with survivors of the civil war and to issue an apology for actions not taken.In Haiti, following Clinton's failed October 1993 attempt to oust Hatian strong man Raoul Cédras, former President Jimmy Carter stepped in to negotiate with the brutal military dictator for his removal from power. Cédras had overthrown the Caribbean nation's democratically elected president, Jean-Bertrand Aristide, in a 1991 coup. Accompanied by retired General Colin Powell and Senator Sam Nunn (D-GA), Carter communicated Clinton's threat to invade unless the generals of the junta relinquished power. With American planes in the air, the generals buckled and agreed to leave. United State forces were sent in to make certain that the agreement was enforced, but they were eventually withdrawn. The democratic institutions of this impoverished nation remain fragile and endangered.

Explanation: Best i can do sorry

During the Clinton administration, key foreign policy successes included the promotion of peace through the Oslo Accords, enforcement of a cease-fire in the Balkans, and an expansion of international trade through agreements like NAFTA. Strategic diplomatic efforts with North Korea and the diversification of key diplomatic roles also marked Clinton's approach to global affairs.

Bill Clinton's presidency marked a transition period in American foreign policy, following the end of the Cold War. President Clinton had several foreign policy achievements, focusing on expanding and revising the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), integrating post-Soviet states into the global community, increasing engagement with Asia, and addressing political and ethnic conflicts around the world.

A major foreign policy success was the facilitation of the Oslo Accords in 1993, leading to a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). In 1995, Clinton sent twenty thousand troops to the Balkans as part of a NATO operation to enforce a cease-fire, showcasing the U.S. commitment to global peacekeeping. Additionally, Clinton's economic policies and support of free trade agreements like the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) significantly increased international trade with partners like Canada, Mexico, and China.

On the diplomatic front, Clinton negotiated with North Korea in an attempt to halt its nuclear program in exchange for aid, representing a strategic use of diplomacy over direct military action to prevent the spread of weapons of mass destruction. Domestically, Clinton's appointment of women and minorities to prominent positions, exemplified by Madeleine Albright as Secretary of State and Janet Reno as Attorney General, greatly impacted the administration's foreign policy strategies in confronting international terrorism.

Answer:

illegal prostitutes

Explanation:

Hope it helps :)

Answer:

Babbitt

Explanation:

Babbitt is a book by Sinclair Lewis published in 1922. Babbitt is a satire of American everyday life in the early twentieth century in its conformist behavior, especially the middle class.

The book shows a virtually universal dilemma: work x private life, which plagues Babbitt and makes his life a succession of dislikes and bitterness.

Answer: the correct answer is women remained in the workplace and men took on more domestic responsibilities.

Explanation: prior to World War II, women were mostly homemakers. Those that worked outside the home usually worked as secretaries, receptionists or department store clerks.

Once America entered World War II, however, men went off to war by the millions and women stepped into the civilian and military positions they left behind. Women were proud to serve their country - but how did their service during the war inspire their fight for social change and equality?

As America’s war machine went into action, the government started a massive publicity campaign to convince women to replace men on assembly lines in factories and defense plants. They produced posters and film reels of glamorous women in the workplace to allure women to serve their country as part of the home-front labor force. After the World War II women became empowered and remained in the workplace.

Answer:

There are many factors. They are: The Sugar act, Stamp act, Declaratory act, Townshend act, Quartering act, Tea act, the Boston Tea party, Coercive act.

Explanation:

The Boston massacre was not only cause of  revolutionary war.

This event occurred on march of 1770 on king street Boston where five colonies were killed by the british.

Before the event british had created a number of new taxes on the Americans  colonies.

Final answer:

Tensions between British soldiers and Boston colonists, competition for jobs, and opposition to British taxation measures contributed to the Boston Massacre.

Explanation:

The Boston Massacre came about due to escalating tensions between the British soldiers stationed in Boston and the local population. Several factors contributed to the hostile atmosphere that culminated in the tragedy on March 5, 1770. First, the occupation of Boston by British troops created resentment among the colonists, leading to increased competition for jobs and fueling opposition to taxation measures imposed by the British Parliament. Additionally, the involvement of groups like the Sons of Liberty, who had been actively intimidating merchants and enforcing boycotts, further aggravated the situation. The presence of these soldiers, referred to as "lobster backs" by the irate Bostonians, was seen as a provocation. On that fateful night, a confrontational crowd began to harass the British soldiers with snowballs, rocks, and sticks, which eventually led to the soldiers firing into the crowd, resulting in five fatalities. The event became a significant catalyst for resistance to British rule, particularly in Massachusetts, and played a key role in the progression towards the American Revolutionary War.

To de-criminalize the use of birth control was not a founding goal of NOW. The National Organization for Women (NOW) was established by a group of feminists who were dedicated to actively challenging sex discrimination in society. NOW fights to promote feminist ideals, lead societal change, eliminate discrimination, and to achieve and protect the equal rights of all women and girls in all aspects of social, political, and economic life.

The goal 'to de-criminalize the use of birth control' was not a founding goal of the National Organization for Women (NOW); the founding goals focused on women's participation in American life, rights equal to men, and the passage of the Equal Rights Amendment.

The founding goals of NOW were to make possible women's participation in all aspects of American life, to gain for them all the rights enjoyed by men, and among the specific goals was the passage of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). The ERA's main objective was to ensure that "equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state on account of sex." While birth control advocacy was important during the feminist movement, it was not explicitly listed as one of NOW's foundational goals when it was formed in 1966.

There were two marking social changes that took place in the United States after the World War II, and as a result of the same. One of them was that the women started to get much more opportunities in life, especially in the working field, which resulted in bigger economic independence of the women, and improvement of their rights. The other one was that the people of other races, especially the African Americans, also gained they rights, as well as much more opportunities in life, as with the women, especially in the working field. The main reason why this happened was that lot of the men were sent to war, and led to big shortage of labor force. In order for the economy to continue to run and grow, the owners of the companies started to employ the people they had available, and in abundance, and that were the women and the African Americans.

After World War II, the United States experienced significant social changes, including advancements in women's rights and increased opportunities for women in the workforce. The war also led to economic growth, the rise of the middle class, and greater access to higher education.

The social changes that took place in the United States after World War II were significant and wide-ranging. One of the major changes was the expansion of women's roles in society. During the war, many women took on jobs traditionally held by men, and this experience led to increased opportunities for women in the workforce and advancements in women's rights. Additionally, the war spurred economic growth and the rise of the middle class, leading to increased consumerism, a higher standard of living, and greater access to higher education.

https://brainly.com/question/34580724

#SPJ11

Indians had no immunity to European diseases

This fact was one of the main causes for the decimation of the Native American population. The Indians simply never encountered the European diseases and their bodies had not antibodies to fight them off.

Hope this helped!

~Just a girl in love with Shawn Mendes

C. Native Americans had no immunity to European diseases.

Diseases like smallpox affected Native Americans very severely primarily because they had no immunity to these European diseases. To understand this, we can break it down into the following key points:

Isolation of the Americas: For thousands of years prior to European contact, the peoples of the Americas lived in relative isolation from Europe, Africa, and Asia. During this long period, many diseases evolved in these continents, particularly in Europe, where populations developed partial immunity to these infections over generations.

Introduction of New Diseases: When Europeans arrived in the Americas, they brought with them diseases such as smallpox, measles, and influenza. Native Americans had never been exposed to these diseases, so they had no developed defenses or resistance against them.

Impact of Smallpox: Smallpox was particularly devastating; it is estimated that it killed millions of Native Americans. The high mortality rate was due to the complete lack of immunity among the tribes. In fact, it is believed that up to 90% of some Indigenous populations were wiped out by these diseases.

Effect on Societal Structure: The massive death toll from diseases significantly weakened Native American societies, making it more difficult for them to resist European conquest. This loss of population led to weakened political structures and disorganization, which further facilitated European colonization efforts.

Environmental Factors: Additionally, the disruption of native lifestyles due to European settlement practices affected their health. European livestock often spread disease to Native Americans more easily, and malnutrition due to agricultural disruption made it harder for those who remained to combat illnesses.

Virginia had the clearest separation of church and state due to the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom enacted in 1786, which influenced the First Amendment.

The state that had the clearest separation of church and state is Virginia. This is evidenced by the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, which was passed in 1786 largely due to the efforts of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. The statute ended state support for the Anglican Church and ensured that civil liberties were separated from one's religious beliefs. Because of this, Virginia's historical role in establishing a policy of religious freedom was crucial and served as a model for the separation of church and state that was later echoed in the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Answer:

to raise revenue to offset the British national debt

Explanation:

they were fighting a war in England against asia and they were struggling because of the loss of prophet from the Americans.

This act was passed to help the British East India company to ease up its financial troubles. Therefore, (C) is correct.

The Act was passed in 1773 permitted the company to ship the tea directly to America and also allowed a tax-free export of tea from Britain.

The high expenditure on wars and the rising corruption in the company, led to the deteriorating condition of the British East India company Therefore, The Tea Act of, 1773 was proposed. Therefore, (C) is correct.

To know more about the Tea Act of 1773, visit the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/12171439

#SPJ2

Answer:

Slavery was abolished in Washington, DC.

Explanation:

The Compromise of 1850 was a series of laws that admitted a series of situations, among them:

California was considered a free state, Utah and New Mexico territories were created and the question of slavery was left to the population of those states to decide and stronger fugitive laws were passed that made easier for southerners to recover fugitive slaves.

Slave trade was abolished in Washington D.C but slavery was not abolished. Slave ownership continued in Washington D.C because Southerners believed that if in the Union’s capital slavery was banished, this would set a precedent.

Answer:

Slavery was abolished in Washington, DC

Explanation: