What was the significance of Genghis Khan

Sorry kid but I really don’t know this one. I’m confused on what your teacher is teaching you

Answer:

The authors portray the suffering of children and workers in mines and factories.

Explanation:

Authors in the 1800s were writing about the lives of the workers in mines and factories in Great Britain to show the world about the horrible situation they were living. The authors wanted to show the dark side of the Industrialization in Britain. Lack often government reaction and regulation on the factories owners led the authors to fight for their cause. Some of the writers included Elizabeth Gaskell in Mary Barton, Charles Dickens in Hard Times, and Elizabeth Barrett Browning in The Cry of the Children.

- the public in the late 1970's wanted renewed emphasis on domestic priorities and reductions in the defense budget. much anti-military sentiment. at that time, however, the soviet union despite having an economy half the size of the US was spending substantially more than the US on defense

-by 1982 people were marching in an antinuclear movement. wanted a freeze on the testing, production, and deployment of nuclear weapons. reagan increased military spending, and conveyed the impression that by relying too much on military strength. revived charges that the united states was largely responsible for the arms race. momentum of the soviet union's arms program were forgotten over this uproar.

Battle of San Juan Hill

hope this helps

The answer would be A hope this helps ❤️

1. The Gold one

2. The supreme court one

3. The one about Georgian laws

1. Gold one, 2 Supreme Court one, 3 the other one

Answer:

the only thing i found was this but it was on brainly onb another question though.

Both Canada and the Latin American nations secured economic independence from the start.they are developed nations.Canada and the Latin American nations had to contend with growing U.S. strength and control of natural resources.

Explanation:really hopes this helps

Answer:

THe arms race was a race to see who was more powerful.

Explanation:

The arms race was to see which super power would have more power.

During the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union were both interested in becoming the most powerful country in the world. One of the main ways in which they wanted to achieve this was by winning an "arms race." This is a type of competition. An arms race refers to a situation in which each country is trying to have more military power (particularly in terms of the number and sophistication of their weapons) than the other one. This was particularly dangerous due to the recent development of nuclear weapons.

Answer:

A) Islam and traditional spiritual beliefs

Explanation:

Correct answer. 4) is wrong

The Songhai people practiced both Option (1) Islam and traditional spiritual beliefs.

The Songhai people are an prominent group in West Africa who speak the various Songhai languages. Their history is linked to the Songhai Empire which dominated the western Sahel in the 15th and 16th century. It was ruled by the dynasty or royal family of Sonni.

All of the Songhai elite or upper-class were Muslim and they practiced Islam. Also the Songhai people believed in the traditional spiritual customs and therefore they also practiced that as their religion.

Thus, the Songhai people practiced both Option (1) Islam and traditional spiritual beliefs.

To learn more about Songhai people, refer -

https://brainly.com/question/17717756

#SPJ2

Answer:

Im not sure but I think its D.

Explanation:

The increasing interest in farming among the urban Americans is the movement show in this poster was a reaction.

The Dutch declared a big focus on sustainable agriculture over two decades ago, mobilizing under the slogan "Twice quite so much food, half as many materials." Since 2000, van den Borne and a few of his compatriots have cut their demand on water for essential crops by up to 90%.

Thus, option D is correct.

For more details about Netherlands so good at farming, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/1632252

#SPJ2

Answer:

He wanted to unify the nation and create lasting peace.

Explanation:

He kneq that a war would only cause numerous casualties. He also thought that the south would just rejoin the union.

Answer:

The correct answer is "He wanted to unify the nation and create lasting peace".

Explanation:

When Abraham Lincoln took the presidency in 1861, the nation was in a political crisis. Lincoln was a liberal, and even though he never said that he wanted to end slavery in the South, he said he don't wanted to see it spread to other parts of the U.S. This was considered as a generous approach to the southerns from Lincoln, given that southerns were opposed that he won the presidency because he was a Republican. Lincoln took a peaceful position to the southerns since he wanted to unify the nation and create lasting peace instead of looking for avenge.

Despite Britain being relatively small country it manged to become the largest empire the world has ever seen, controlling territories on all continents in the world except for Antarctica. The reasons behind the British success were multiple, but all related with the high level of development. The British were the ones that invented and started the industrialization, which made them economic superpower. They managed to create lot of new inventions, which helped them a lot in making their military much more advanced, having superior weaponry, and equipment. Also, this empire managed to become a political superpower as well, using the politics in its advantage and being able to easily outsmart the others.

yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes

Answer:

The answer should be circumnavigate.

Explanation:

The reason why the answer is circumnavigate is because the def. is

"sail or travel all the way around (something, especially the world).

go around or avoid (an obstacle).

"he helped her to circumnavigate a frozen puddle"

avoid dealing with (something difficult or unpleasant).

"they circumnavigated the issue"

Answer:

Explanation:

It's either A or B. Is this based off of a book, past histories? Do we have any additional information?

Answer:

A

Explanation:

you are talking about ww1, i just had this question

Disease, slavery and abuse of the African people

Answer:

There were many negative impacts due to European colonization of Africa.  Since the other user stated disease & slavery, I will only briefly talk about those (abuse is very much in the realms of slavery).

During the Colonial Era as well as the Age of Imperialism (which followed after), Europeans (specifically France, Spain, Britain, and later on Germany, Austrio-Hungary, etc.) were keen on exploring, creating colonies, and exploiting the resources offered by these 3rd world countries (of the time).

Africa, on one hand, took the brunt force of most of these colonies, as they suffered the longest colonization period. Towards the beginning of the colonization era, Africa was explored as Europeans had to go around the Cape Horn in an effort to find a oceanic route to China, where they hoped to open trade with. This led to European countries laying claim on African lands where they land, and building up colonies there. However, the Europeans soon had a falling apart with the tribes, which led to wars between the colonizers and the colonised. Usually, the Europeans were victorious (except for cases such as Ethiopia & Italy, but even then, they fail later on), and imprisoned many of the natives, leading to a large supply of slaves within the Middle East. As the states in the US soon expanded and grew into a country, many southern states soon had a growing market for these said states, which led to the enslavement of many fit Africans. (negative impact #1: enslavement of Africans).

On top of enslavement, the European countries soon introduced "cash crops" to the nations, which were crops (tobacco, cotton, and the like) that generated "cash", but not food, which the colonies dutifully grew, which delayed their economic growth, as they were not able to self-sustain, and their economy relied heavily on one or two crops (which can have a changing market demand; Remember the supply v. demand, in which prices vary depending on demand. If the demand is low, the price would generally be low). These crops were perfect for certain time periods, but soon fell out of favor, resulting in loss profits. These countries, with their only high-source of income being these cash-crops, soon lost profit, which resulted in a smaller economy than before.

Another negative impact that the Europeans had have in occupying the African Continent, was the amount of funding they gave to the nation. Excluding stronger economic nations in Africa (Egypt really), and the Middle East, most of the nations were not properly funded, and lacked development. This is extremely true, as most 3rd world countries are located in Africa and the Middle East. The way most power was given back to the people during the decolonization era also led to wars and coup d'tat across the continent, leading to an unstable economy and life for those who lived in it. Without proper decolonization methods, the countries soon fell into turmoil.

Finally, the African culture was heavily damaged due to European colonization. As most Europeans during that time were either Roman-Catholic or Protestant, the colonizers also brought their religions with them, and usually forced natives into believing in their same religion. While this is not a bad thing in itself, it led to a destruction of their native religion as well as their culture, and the way they lived.

All of these are different kinds of ways Europeans have a negative impact on their former African countries.

~

Answer:

People argue to say that it was unfair to germay as they faced all the concequences despite other countries being involved, the sum of money demanded was far too high causing the german economy to crash not only did germany have to pay financial reperations but it had to disarm, lose territory and give up all of its overseas colonies making it hard to earn any money. Because of this, germany faced mass inflation and the people were suffering

Answer:

a. natural rights

Explanation:

"life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness,"

Answer:

I believe it is c. political rights

Let me know if I am right or wrong

Answer:

A proxy war is an armed conflict in which two countries use third parties as intermediaries or substitutes, so that they do not directly fight each other.

Although superpowers have often used national governments like proxies, insurgent groups or others are more commonly employed. It is hoped that such groups can defeat the opponent without escalating into a major war.

Proxy wars can also occur in parallel with major conflicts. During the Iran-Iraq War, for example, both nations armed rival factions in the Civil War of Lebanon and incited them against each other.

To allow powerful countries to engage in conflicts without directly fighting each other

Group of answer choices:

A) Is designed to be implemented only for catastrophic incidents, since local resources are usually sufficient in smaller emergencies.

B) Mandates that the private-sector entities responsible for critical infrastructure and key resources develop and exercise contingency plans.

C) Is based on the premise that governments have sole responsibility for responding to major emergencies.

D) Is intended to provide guidance for the whole community.

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "D": Is intended to provide guidance for the whole community.

Explanation:

The National Response Framework (NRF) is a coordinated initiative of all major U.S. security and government components aimed at responding to disasters and emergencies that may occur within the country. The NRF aims to deter, plan, react and recover from terrorist attacks or any other form of national disaster and provide communities with guidance on the set of measures required to deal with these situations.

The National Response Framework (NRF) is a comprehensive guide developed by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to coordinate response efforts during disasters and emergencies. It focuses on implementing civil defense measures, including anti-terrorism legislation, and ensuring the resilience of critical national infrastructure.

The National Response Framework (NRF) is a comprehensive guide developed by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to outline how the nation responds to all types of disasters and emergencies. It provides a structured approach to coordinating response efforts among federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial stakeholders.

One of the key objectives of the NRF is implementing civil defense and emergency preparedness measures, including anti-terrorism legislation. This means taking proactive steps to prevent and respond to acts of terrorism and other emergencies that may threaten the safety and security of the nation.

Another important aspect of the NRF is ensuring the resilience of a critical national infrastructure. This involves protecting and maintaining essential systems and resources such as transportation, communication, energy, and healthcare to ensure they can withstand and recover from disasters.

https://brainly.com/question/12702845

#SPJ6

To the surprise of many, the House elected John Quincy Adams over rival Andrew Jackson. It was widely believed that Clay, the Speaker of the House at the time, convinced Congress to elect Adams, who then made Clay his Secretary of State. Jackson’s supporters denounced this as a "corrupt bargain."

Answer:

He thought that John Quincy Adams and Henry Clay made a deal to each get the position they wanted.

Explanation:

YW

President Thomas Jefferson hoped that the Embargo Act of 1807 would help the United States by demonstrating to Britain and France their dependence on American goods, convincing them to respect Americanneutrality and stop impressingAmerican seamen. Instead, the act had a devastating effect on Americantrade.

The embargo act was passed by President Thomas Jefferson. Since America did not want to get involved in foreign affairs after the war for independence. Both Britain and France were trying to sabotage trade for the opposing country and America was neutral in the middle. The Embargo act was bad for the US economy. It stopped external trade which led to smuggling goods to trade illegally. The value of cash crops and agricultural goods in America decreased significantly because of the high volume of farmers. This soon led to a economic depression.

Answer:

25th Amendment, sec 4

Explanation:

Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.

Answer:

Pennsylvania Pennsylvania in 1681 King Charles ll granted William Penn a charter for the area that was to become known as Pennsylvania. However, in 1656 they arrived in Barbados and then went to the Massachusetts Bay Colony, but they were mistreated . They then found a home in Rhode Island. In 1675 there was a settlement along the Delaware River. Pennsylvania than became a home thanks to Charles ll.

False. The union won this battle.

Answer:

The correct answer is B, as the statement is false. The Battle of Antietam was a victory for the Union.

Explanation:

The Battle of Antietam was fought on September 17, 1862 at Sharpsburg, Maryland, as part of the Maryland Campaign.

It was one of the most important battles of the Civil War on the territory controlled by the Union, with 23,000 victims. Although not conclusive from a tactical point of view, it had a significant meaning, being regarded with some generosity by the Unionists as a "partial" victory for them and for having provided President Abraham Lincoln with the right to issue his well-known Emancipation Proclamation.

Answer:

the answer is A.  religious ceremonies

Explanation:

A. Religious ceremonies

Answer:

Explanation: There are many differences between the role of women in China and Indian Hindu Society during the classical era.

1. In classical era Chinese women were not forced to early marriage. So they at least could finish their study. But in Indian Hindu society women used to get married at early age. So they didn't have the right to inherit knowledge.

2. In China women in ruler family could indirectly rule on behalf of the under age prince. But in India women were not allowed to do so in classical era.

3.Chinese women  were not prohibited from taking part in religious and social rituals. But in India women were only the part of household activities.

4. During Classical era Chinese women could inherit the property whereas Indian Hindu society didn't allow to have properties.

In the classical era, Indian Hindu women had significant roles in religious, spiritual and philosophical traditions but later were subjected to patriarchal societal norms. In contrast, Chinese women experienced a more egalitarian society, especially during the Neolithic era, and could enjoy certain freedoms, despite the patriarchal influence of Confucianism.

During the classical era, women in China and Indian Hindu society played different roles.

In Indian Hindu society, it appears that women were highly considered and held significant roles in the religious and spiritual activities as demonstrated in Vedic writings. There were women figures who were seen as highly spiritual and knowledgeable sages. These women participated in important dialogues and even composed hymns for the Rig Veda, indicating that women had a role in the spiritual aspects of society.

However, eventually, the culture became more patriarchal, restricting women to more domestic roles and fully dependent on their male counterparts. An extreme example of this is the ritual of sati, practiced by widows, which emerged from the belief that a woman's life served no further purpose following the death of her husband.

In contrast, archaeological evidence suggests that early Chinese societies were more egalitarian, and women were treated almost on par with men, particularly during the Neolithic era. Women also participated in important economic activities like weaving and were allowed certain freedoms. Despite the influence of patriarchal Confucianism, Chinese women could enjoy some measure of independence and freedom through Buddhism and Daoism, which had a more liberal view on women's roles.

https://brainly.com/question/28270050

#SPJ3

A cotton grid is a machine that quickly separates cotton fibers from there seeds. The negative impact was that the rate of slaves increased and the number of slave states increased as well. Interchangeable parts are parts inside of a product that can be replaced piece by piece, without having to replace the entire product. Assembly line is when you have all the workers rounded up in a row, and they all repeatedly do the same job the entire time. The purpose of this was to save time.

Hope this helps chu

Have a great day ♡♡

Anti-immigrant sentiment has been fueled in recent years by the consideration in some states of measures designed to crack down on illegal immigration. As a result, the experiences of immigrants (or those perceived to look foreign born) with discrimination have increased.

 The cumulative effects of such interactions place Latino families and their children at increased risk for a range of negative outcomes such as emotional stress, limited financial opportunities, and increased social isolation. Such forms of discrimination at the individual level may heighten recipients’ risk for health and mental-health problems.

Answer:

1. the civil war was all about people not liking what was going on on each side like slavery, and not farming cotton.

2. because Abe hated slavery and tried (succeeding) to end slavery.

3. because half of the U.s hated slavery.

4 .the states bordering anything but the U.s.

5. because the northern hated it they didn'y like people acting as if they were better than others.

Explanation:

Answer: the answer is :

. D

Explanation:

IT IS THE D BECAUSE IT WAS A MOVEMENT OF SOUTHERN

Final answer:

The Great Migration of the 20th century was a movement of southern African Americans to the West and North.

Explanation:

The Great Migration of the 20th century refers to the movement of over 1.5 million African Americans from the South to cities in the North and West between 1910 and 1930. This migration was driven by factors such as poor economic opportunities and social prejudice in the South, as well as the availability of well-paid jobs in industrial cities in the North. About half a million individuals migrated during World War I to take advantage of wartime employment in Northern factories.

The answer d.the three-day struggle was won by the north.-apex

The Battle of Gettysburg was won by the North, making answer D correct. This critical three-day conflict resulted in a turning point in the Civil War, repelling General Lee's invasion of the North. The correct option is: D. The three-day struggle was won by the North.

The question pertains to the Battle of Gettysburg, a pivotal engagement during the American Civil War. The correct answer to the question, which asks which description best characterizes the Battle of Gettysburg, is D. The three-day struggle was won by the North. This battle, which occurred from July 1-3, 1863, marked a significant turning point in the war. General Robert E. Lee's Confederate Army of Northern Virginia met the Union Army of the Potomac, commanded by Major General George G. Meade, at Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.

Following key events such as Pickett's Charge, the Union forces were able to repel the Confederate attacks, leading to a Union victory. The defeat at Gettysburg, alongside the loss at Vicksburg, significantly dampened the momentum of the Confederacy and contributed to the eventual Union triumph in the Civil War.