Answer:
A
They had a duty to improve society.
Explanation:
Women became leaders in a range of social and political movements from 1890 through 1920. This period is known as the Progressive Era. Progressive reformers wanted to end political corruption, improve the lives of individuals, and increase government intervention to protect citizens. Earlier generations discouraged women from participating in public, political movements, society began to embrace female activism in the late nineteenth century. Progressives often argued that women’s politics complemented their traditional roles as wives and mothers, caregivers and keepers of virtue.
Final answer:
Women in the Progressive movement argued that they had a duty to improve society, and were instrumental in advocating for various social reforms, including the right to vote. Their involvement ranged from labor movements to suffrage campaigns, reflecting a broader push for women's rights and increased social justice.
Explanation:
An argument made by women in the Progressive movement was that they had a duty to improve society (A). This was a time of significant social reform, and many women, having been active in various public efforts before becoming suffragists, found their calling in addressing the issues of urban and industrial America. They played a decisive role in movements aiming to pass protective labor laws, argued for better working conditions, and sought to expand their own rights by advocating for suffrage.
Recognizing the power and importance of the vote, they were also active in women's rights movements, pushing for access to education and the professions. The move to be active outside the traditional domain of the home, combined with an increase in formal education and political activism, challenged the status quo and supported the growth of the women's suffrage movement.
Women during the Progressive Era reframed their domestic skills to serve community needs, contributing to social projects altogether and making a significant impact in various reform movements. As they ventured into the public sphere, they combated discrimination and supported crucial social, economic, and political reforms, ultimately advocating women's suffrage as a means to pursue and achieve these goals more effectively.
1. Categorizing What are the four major elements that the Bhutanese include in their central concept of
Gross National Happiness (GNH)? What others might you add? What might you want eliminated from
their list?
Answer:
The concept of GNH has often been explained by its four pillars; good governance, sustainable socio-economic development, cultural preservation, and environmental conservation.
Explanation:
Hope this what you was looking for :D
The Bhutanese's Gross National Happiness (GNH) consists of four elements: sustainable development, environmental conservation, cultural preservation, and good governance. These aim to ensure economic growth, preservation of culture as well as nature, and robust governance with citizen's participation. Possible additions could be initiatives around mental health and inclusivity.
Explanation:The four major elements that the Bhutanese include in their central concept of Gross National Happiness (GNH) are largely categorized under: sustainable development, environmental conservation, cultural preservation, and good governance. These key elements are deemed imperative in recognizing the holistic as well as the spiritual, physical, and mental facets of human well-being.
Sustainable development emphasizes on balanced economic growth that does not exploit resources or compromise future generations. Environmental conservation entails responsible use and preservation of the natural environment to maintain biodiversity and ecological harmony. Cultural preservation encompasses the protection and promotion of Bhutanese traditions, customs and heritage, believing that cultural diversity is an important source of resilience. Finally, good governance corresponds to the importance of equitable socio-economic development, impartial law enforcement, and encouraging popular participation in decision-making processes.
As for what could be added or eliminated, it's primarily a subjective analysis and depends significantly upon the individual's viewpoint and cultural nuances. However, considering their emphasis on holistic well-being, aspects like mental health preparedness or more intense focus on inclusivity and diversity might be worthwhile additions.
Learn more about Gross National Happiness here:https://brainly.com/question/13527175
#SPJ2
Southern society was made up of many social and economic classes of citizens. Different classes of people had different experiences when the war finally came.
How did the Civil War impact poor men differently than it did rich men in the South?
Question options:
All poor men were forced to fight in the war, whereas rich men were encouraged to stay at home and maintain the plantations.
It was policy that only men with slaves fought, so while poor men were generally excused, rich men made up a large portion of the army.
The South could not afford to spare anyone, so poor and rich alike fought side by side and without exemption.
Poor men could not avoid the draft, but rich men with more than 20 slaves could pay to have someone replace them on the battlefield.
The correct answer is D; Poor men could not avoid the draft, but rich men with more than 20 slaves could pay to have someone replace them on the battlefield.
Further Explanation:
The Northern Draft allowed men to pay $300 to get out of being drafted. They could also hire a replacement man to fight in their place with their own money.
The Southern Draft did not allow the poorer men to pay money or have someone to fight in their place. However, if a man owned 20 slaves they could then pay for someone to fight in their place. During the war, this number was changed to owning only 15 slaves to get out of the draft. It was never changed so that it was fair to others who owned only one or two slaves. When they changed it to 15 slaves, the owners still had to pay a few hundred dollars also.
Learn more about the Civil War at https://brainly.com/question/2190275
#LearnwithBrainly
The civil war has shown us many traits of people which represented the mindset of rich people and the helplessness of poor people.
How did civil war impacted rich and poor men differently?The southern society was formed including different classes of people consisting the rich as well as the poor people.
The rich people having 20 or more slaves have the option to pay and send someone else in their place to fight in the war.
The poor men were not allowed to send someone else in their place to fight in the war by avoiding the drafting , they could not even afford the amount of replacing even if allowed to replace their place.
Therefore the Civil War impact poor men differently than it did rich men in the South and Poor men could not avoid the draft, but rich men with more than 20 slaves could pay to have someone replace them on the battlefield, OPTION D is correct.
Learn more about civil war here:
brainly.com/question/14234520
How would you describe the first meeting between
Columbus and the American Indians of
Hispaniola, as shown in this quote?
Answer: friendly
Answer: Exchange of goods.
Explanation:
In the context of the friendly relationship between the American natives and the Columbus expedition, we can talk about the exchange of cultures. The Indians introduced to Europeans certain crops that were unknown in Europe. Europeans, on the other hand, entered the Indians to a more efficient way of cultivating the land and introduced to them certain animal species such as the horse. The horse was indispensable in Europe, crucial in everyday life. The horse will then greatly facilitate growth for the Indians, will help them to transport people and goods faster, will help them in the war and the processing of agricultural products. Europeans paired Indians with wheat as well.The Indians, on the other hand, introduced to Europeans certain plant species that Europe did not know. So after European meetings, corn, tomatoes, and potatoes will be found on the European tables, which will significantly enrich the nutrition of Europeans. Some products will gain high popularity in Europe, and of all the above, potatoes have gained the most demand.The first meeting between Columbus and the American Indians of Hispaniola was friendly, with the natives bringing provisions and gifts and engaging in amicable trade with Columbus and his men. Columbus's journal entries suggest a positive and curious interaction from both sides.
The first meeting between Columbus and the American Indians of Hispaniola, as described in historical accounts, was characterized by friendly interactions. The natives came out to meet Columbus and his men with provisions and gifts, and they engaged in trade with the utmost good will. According to Columbus's journal, the natives were delighted with small trinkets and became attached to the Spaniards, indicating an initial friendly and curious relationship.
What was the main cause of treaty of Versailles
Answer:
It ´s a peace treaty that formally ended the First World War, though hostilities actually had ended in 1918. It was signed in 1919 by the victors - France, Britain, the USA and other Allies - and the vanquished - Germany, Austria, allies - . In one clause, it blames Germany for the war, and it imposes exorbitant , humilliating reparations on Germany and limitations on its army. It also redrew the political map of Europe, giving nations such as Poland independence.
Explanation:
Which term refers to the post-World War American authors who rejected the materialism of 1920s culture?
A) Harlem renaissance
B) Bolsheviks
C) lost generation
Answer:
The correct response is Option C: The Lost Generation.
Explanation:
The Lost Generation refers to a group of American writers who came of age during the period of World War I. In the years after the war, they were a group of expatriates living in Europe for the most part, including well known figures like Ernest Hemingway and F. Scott Fitzgerald. Although the term is used more widely to refer to the entire generation of Americans and Europeans who grew up during WWI, the group of expatriate writers tended to use autobiographical themes that criticized the decadence and the frivolous lifestyle in the wealthy classes. Gertrude Stein was also living in Paris and established a salon where many writers would meet.
Why Did the United States Enter the War?
Think about the factors that pushed the United States to the breaking point.
Check all of the issues that were deciding factors in the United States' decision to enter the war.
The Allies' requests for help
Direct attacks on US soil
Direct attacks on US ships
Germany's attempted alliance with Mexico
A desire to preserve democracy in the world
DONE
Intro
GO000000000000DDDDDDDDDDDD
7 of 24
Which economic activities are natural and unnatural according to Aristotle?
a.) œconomia is natural and borrowing is not.
b.) money making for the sake of money making is natural and growing food is not.
c.) œconomia is natural and chrematistké is not
d.) lending and borrowing is natural and investing is not.
Answer:
Answer is Option C: œconomia is natural and chrematistké is not.
Explanation:
Aristotle was one of the greatest thinkers who was admired for his knowledge in components of a market economy. He provided his analysis on human needs and means. He said that if the end products are useful to people then the means of production are also valuable. The more useful product is, higher is the value of means of production.
According to him, Chrematistics means getting wealth with moneymaking and exchange is unnatural. He classified Economics or household management as natural i.e: wealth-getting activity whose means is “truth” and “virtue’ are natural.
A word that means “gods chosen one” in Hebrew
What is a word that means God's chosen one in Hebrew?
There is no single Hebrew word with this meaning, but you can translate it as a phrase: God's chosen male = bachir elohim (בחיר אלוקים) God's chosen female = bechirat elohim (בחירת אלוקים)
The rock and Pilar edicts were issued by who
Answer:
Emperor ashoka
Explanation:
of the mauryan empire who ruled from 268 BCE to 232 BCE
Final answer:
The rock edicts were issued by Ashoka, the Mauryan Emperor of India, and conveyed various messages related to morality and administrative policies. The Pilar edicts refer to the Rosetta Stone, which contains a decree issued by a council of priests affirming the royal cult of Ptolemy V in Egypt.
Explanation:
The rock edicts were issued by Ashoka, the Mauryan Emperor of India, during the 3rd century BCE. These edicts were inscribed on rocks and pillars across his empire and conveyed various messages related to morality, religious tolerance, and administrative policies.
The Pilar edicts, on the other hand, refer to the Rosetta Stone, an ancient artifact discovered in Egypt. The stone contains a decree issued by a council of priests affirming the royal cult of Ptolemy V, a young pharaoh of Egypt, on the first anniversary of his coronation. The decree is inscribed in three scripts - hieroglyphic, demotic, and Greek - and played a crucial role in deciphering ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs.
Overall, the rock edicts were issued by Ashoka in India, while the Pilar edicts refer to the Rosetta Stone in Egypt.
Which of the following was not a cause of World War 1
A. a strong sense of nationalism in European countries.
B. the building up of European countries’ military resources in the late 1800s.
C. Communist ideas sweeping across Europe
D. Agreements by countries to protect one another in war time
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Communism sweeping across Europe was a WWII issue
Answer:
c
Explanation:
A cancelled us treasury check for the purchase of Alaska is an example of which of the following?
A canceled US Treasury check for the purchase of Alaska is an example of a primary source document.
C) primary source document.
Explanation:
Primary source document is a type of document, recording, artifact or autobiography that provides trustable or direct evidence about the person, an event, object or work of art.
Eyewitness statement, statistical data, legal documents, audio and video recordings and written documents are considered as some of the primary sources.
During 1866, it is evident that the Russian government was ready to sell the territory of Alaska to the United States of America. U.S government was ready to pay the check for $7.2 million to the Russian Minister for purchasing Alaska.
What two 1920s culture developments were directly linked to the Scopes Trial? Select two correct answers
Final answer:
The Scopes Monkey Trial is associated with the cultural developments of the 1920s that include the confrontation between religious traditionalism and modern scientific thought, as well as the new morality of the youth versus the conventional mores of the older generation.
Explanation:
The Scopes Monkey Trial of the 1920s is directly linked to two major cultural developments of that era: the clash between traditional religious beliefs and the modernist approach to science and education, as well as the broader cultural war between conservative rural America and the more liberal urban society. The trial highlighted the tension over the teaching of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, which was opposed by conservative and evangelical groups as contrary to religious teachings about divine creation. This event became emblematic of the times, representing the contest between old and new values in America's rapidly changing society.
Another cultural development associated with the Scopes Trial was the new morality, characterized by more permissive mores adopted by many young people during the 1920s. Amidst the backdrop of the trial, which was heavily covered by the media, the country witnessed a growing divide between the youth embracing modernity and the elders holding on to their traditional values. Thus, the Scopes Trial serves as a concrete example of how cultural and ideological differences were being publicly debated and struggled over in the United States.
According to Wang Dayuan, traders were afraid to come to Singapura
because
A. there were illegal immigrants
B. there were pirates
C. there were lunatics
D. there were barbarians
Answer:
a
Explanation:
there were illegal immigrants
Which of these factors did not encourage western settlement?
American Indians selling their land
Completion of the transcontinental railroad
Growth of the cattle industry
Land grants through the Homestead Act
American Indians selling land discouraged western settlement due to forced displacement and conflicts, contrary to growth incentives.
Selling American Indian land did not encourage western settlement. Instead, it frequently followed coercive methods, displacement and conflicts with native communities. By establishing connections between remote areas, fostering trade and facilitating easier migration, the completion of the transcontinental railroad significantly facilitated westward expansion. Settlements were drawn by the expanding cattle industry, which increased demand for ranching and related services.
The Homestead Act offered opportunities for people to acquire land through grants, which encouraged settlement by providing incentives for land ownership. The forced land sales of American Indians stood in stark contrast to the factors that encouraged westward expansion, illuminating the complicated and occasionally unfair dynamics of western settlement at the time.
To know more about western settlement here
brainly.com/question/838594
#SPJ3
Why did the US government think internment camps were
were necessary during World War II?
to protect against discrimination
to protect national security
to improve relations with Japan
to improve relations with Germany
Answer: To protect national security.
Explanation: They thought they needed the internment camps were necessary because the Japanese had bombed Pearl Harbor and they were angry and afraid of the Japanese people after, even the native U.S. citizens.
The US government thinks internment camps were necessary during World War II to protect national security. The correct option is B.
What was the US policy of internment during ww2?On February 19, 1942, Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066. People of Japanese descent, both foreign-born and citizens of the United States, were detained as a result of the order and interned in camps in six western states as well as Arkansas. The internment policy ended up being the turning point in Asian American history of the 20th century.
The main justification given by the US government for the need for internment camps during World War II was to safeguard national security. The US was compelled to enter World War II when Japan declared war at Pearl Harbor.
Thus, the ideal selection is option A.
Learn more about the US policy here:
https://brainly.com/question/14617934
#SPJ5
A secondary source document might be an encyclopedia entry, or a story passed down from parent to child.
Question 6 options:
True
False
Answer:
i believe it is true
Explanation:
a secondary source would be from someone not there or directly connected to it
Which of the following states secured the ratification of the Constitution?
A Virginia
B. Maryland
c North Carolina
D. New Hampshire
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
OOOO
Answer:1. The answer is D. new Hemisphere.
The ratification achieved by new Hemisphere in June 21st, 1788, In order to ratified, new hemisphere added a suggestion to be added to the constitution. That suggestion is that the government shall never disarm their citizens. This suggestion help to become the foundation of the second amendment in united states.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is D. New Hamshire
Match the Influence of each of the following items on corporations.
1. invested the capital needed by corporations; chose directors
Clayton Antitrust Act
stockholders
Federal Trade Commission
made management and organization of workers and
materials more efficient and productive
3. enforced laws, thus checking corporate power
outlawed certain methods used by corporations to crush
their competitors
enforced antitrust laws, protecting small businesses;
restrained power of big corporations
Theodore Roosevelt
business specialists
Answer:
1. invested the capital needed by corporations; chose directors : stockholders
2. made management and organization of workers and
materials more efficient and productive : business specialists
3. enforced laws, thus checking corporate power : Federal Trade Commission
4. outlawed certain methods used by corporations to crush
their competitors:Clayton Antitrust Act
5. enforced antitrust laws, protecting small businesses;
restrained power of big corporations: Theodore Roosevelt
Explanation:
This answer discusses the influence of different items on corporations, such as Theodore Roosevelt, business specialists, the Clayton Antitrust Act, the Federal Trade Commission, and efficient management and organization of workers and materials.
Explanation:The given items and their influences on corporations are as follows:
Theodore Roosevelt: Enforced antitrust laws, protecting small businesses and restraining the power of big corporations. Business specialists: Invested the capital needed by corporations and chose directors. Clayton Antitrust Act: Outlawed certain methods used by corporations to crush their competitors. Federal Trade Commission: Enforced laws, thus checking corporate power. Management and organization of workers and materials: Made more efficient and productive for corporations. Learn more about Influence of items on corporations here:
https://brainly.com/question/33885599
#SPJ11
Why might it have been hard for people in the thirteen colonies to join together? Select all that apply.
They had different backgrounds.
They worked in many kinds of businesses.
They practiced the same religion.
They owned slaves.
They lived in different colonies.
Answer:
The answers are,
They had different backgrounds.
They worked in many kinds of businesses.
They lived in different colonies
Explanation:
Not all people.people.to se colonies came from similar ctubal back grounds and most of them were from different European countries with different backgrounds.
Moreover they were separated geographically in vast distances. From one state to another, at that time it easier en difficult to travel.
In addition, the economic background of people in these states were different as well.
Answer:
I agree with the first person that answered
Explanation:
Thank you!
Marbury vs Madison is significant because it
a. established judicial review
b. established courtcase
c. none of the choices are correct
d. established supreme court
B. Pro-democracy activist
for democracy in Myanmar, which was once called
and others are still struggling
roduce for classroom use.
C. In Cambodia, the
, under the leadership of
, massacred more than a million people.
Answer:
1. Aung San Suu Kyi is the famous human rights champion and democracy fighter of Myanmar. She is the Burmese PM, but she has been harsly critized for belittling the brutal repression of Rohingya people by the army.
2. The Khmer Rouge , the Maoist communist movement that took power in Cambodia in 1975 and commited genocide while pursuing the construction of a utopian agrarian society.
Explanation:
Which of the following is an example of a personal right?
OA. owning property
B.
Joining a labor union
OC. running for public office
D. freedom of association
Answer:Im thinking d
Explanation:
please help me i'll mark brainliest PLEASE PLEASE!!!!!!!!
What was the benefit of the Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA) limiting the production of crops and livestock?
A.
to raise the quality of agricultural products
B.
to reduce the power of large commercial farms
C.
to raise the prices of agricultural products
D.
to increase the power of sharecroppers and tenant farmers
How did the suspension of antitrust laws by the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) affect unions?
A.
The suspension allowed businesses to set minimum wage laws.
B.
The suspension banned the power of collective bargaining.
C.
The suspension continued the policy of workers negotiating as individuals.
D.
The suspension exposed workers to potentially unfair agreements.
How did New Deal environmental projects try to prevent another Dust Bowl?
A.
by forcing farmers to plant invasive species that grew quickly
B.
by removing trees to create more farmland in some regions
C.
by repealing regulations on farmers that limited what they could grow
D.
by enforcing new farming techniques that prevented dust storms
The benefit of the Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA) limiting the production of crops and livestock was:
C. to raise the prices of agricultural products
The suspension of antitrust laws by the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) affected unions by:
D. The suspension exposed workers to potentially unfair agreements.
New Deal environmental projects aimed to prevent another Dust Bowl by:
D. by enforcing new farming techniques that prevented dust storms
The Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA) aimed to address agricultural overproduction during the Great Depression. By limiting crop and livestock production, it sought to reduce surpluses and stabilize prices. This ultimately raised the prices of agricultural products (option C), benefiting farmers financially. However, this approach also faced criticisms for exacerbating the economic plight of sharecroppers and tenant farmers.
The suspension of antitrust laws by the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) affected unions by exposing workers to potentially unfair agreements (option D). Without antitrust laws, businesses had more freedom to engage in monopolistic practices, potentially undermining workers' rights and bargaining power.
New Deal environmental projects attempted to prevent another Dust Bowl by enforcing new farming techniques that prevented dust storms (option D). These initiatives included soil conservation methods, reforestation efforts, and promoting sustainable agricultural practices to mitigate soil erosion and prevent ecological disasters like the Dust Bowl.
2. Why might Chinese people hesitate to speak out against China's one-child policy?
Final answer:
Chinese people might hesitate to criticize China's one-child policy due to government control, cultural values, and fear of repercussions.
Explanation:
Chinese people may hesitate to speak out against China's one-child policy for several reasons:
Government control: The Chinese government has historically faced criticism for its strict control over its citizens. The one-child policy was implemented as a way to control population growth and maintain social stability. Speaking out against this policy can be seen as challenging the authority of the government, which may lead to negative consequences.
Cultural values: Chinese society places high importance on family and traditional values. The one-child policy has had a significant impact on family dynamics, including creating a generation of only children and a potential lack of support for elderly parents. Despite the negative consequences associated with the policy, cultural values may lead some individuals to hesitate in openly criticizing it.
Fear of repercussions: Speaking out against government policies, especially controversial ones, can lead to various consequences, such as backlash, loss of job opportunities, or social isolation. These factors contribute to a climate of fear and self-censorship.
To what extent did immigrants give up their heritage to become Americanized, or fully assimilated into the existing culture?
Answer:
The immigration experience for different groups of immigrants is different and they assimilated to American society in different ways. There were also biases and prejudices on the part of mainstream society that were barriers for some populations.
Explanation:
The process of assimilating into American culture is complex. The early immigrants from Northern Europe who arrived in colonial times or shortly thereafter had an easier assimilation process as they were more like the settlers culturally and historically although some Scandinavian and German cultural influences remained among families and in particular regions. There was also a large population who immigrated from Ireland around time from the 1820s to 1860s. In the mid to late 1800s there were waves of immigration from Southern and Eastern Europe and they were linguistically and culturally more distinct and so they also created enclaves in many of the the largest cities that allowed them to keep some of their heritage. Generally by the second generation immigrant children adopt many of the traits of the dominant culture and they are bilingual in many cases but can speak English like anyone born American. The Chinese for example were discriminated against and excluded with the Chinese Exclusion Act in 1882. It was harder for them to assimilate.
What is culture tied to in the northeast
Final answer:
Culture in the Northeast is closely linked to its history of Yankee idealism, the industrial revolution, and diverse European immigration patterns, contributing to a unique cultural and linguistic landscape.
Explanation:
The culture in the Northeast United States is deeply tied to its history of Yankee idealism, faith in good government and social reform, and self-sufficient individualism. This cultural landscape is rooted in the region's early development, marked by the industrial revolution in New England and its Yankee cultural hearth in Boston. The influence of European immigration and westward settlement patterns has further diversified the culture, blending various cultural traditions brought by migrants from the New England, Mid-Atlantic, and Southern regions.
This rich mosaic of cultures is also reflected in the distinct dialects found in the Northeast, largely within the Yankee dialect family, and the historical significance of Native American tribes, such as the Iroquois Confederacy, which played a vital role in the region's early social fabric.
what were the 4 parts that the Union used as a strategy during the civil war
Anaconda plan, Richmond, Atlanta, Savannah were the four parts that the Union used as a strategy during the civil war.
Explanation:
Anaconda plan was a military plan that eliminated all the Confederate help from abroad and also blocked away all the southern coasts. It was a naval blockade. The Mississippi River was the waterway for the South which was controlled and in the northern river control, Texas, Louisiana and other few confederate states were controlled.
Richmond was captured and all the confederate lines were demolished and disrupted. In need to break the spirit and center of the confederate army, South Carolina was taken over by destroying Atlanta and Savannah.
What did the Anti-Federalists want?
a Bill of Rights
to immediately ratify the Constitution
a more powerful central government
less debate over the new plan for government
Answer:
The Anti-Federalists wanted a Bill of Rights to protect the rights of the people.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Because the federalist were with the constitution and the anti were against it and argued about it
The main reason Americans wanted to change the Articles of Confederation was
a. to form a stronger army
c. to form a stronger government
b. to raise taxes
d. to form a bicameral congress
Answer:
The correct answer is C, to form a stronger government.
Explanation:
It was during the Shays' Rebellion (1786-1787) that became evident for conservatives that the Articles of Confederation had to be changed.
This rebellion attacked many courts and was widely feared as a moment where masses took for themselves the values of freedom in a way that endangered property and order in the newly born country.
That's why in this context figures like Alexander Hamilton argued for a strong government: to deal with situations like this that threatened the status quo. According to him and other Federalists, the Articles did not have tools for this kind of situation as it was a document where the central government barely had any power.
Which of the following best describes how the English viewed Native American ties to the land?
Answer:
The British always believed and thought Native Americans were savages and rough people who had to be toned under Western culture.
Explanation:
According to the British, Native Americans were part of the "others" who were just a community who weren't civilized and Europeans could be the only one who could make them civilized.
The British always believed and thought Native Americans were savages and rough people who had to be toned under the Western culture. Europeans never looked at "other" equal as them, they always thought they were the superior and the rest of the world was inferior. Indeed, they believed the Native Americans weren't civilized based on their faith or culture or economics or government and they fixed as an universal decision that it was their place to change everyone civilized.