Answer:
The rise of aggressive nationalism among some of the nations defeated in World War I.
The rise of communism in Soviet Russia, which was seen as a threat by many European nations.
Explanation:
These are the two factors that led to the beginning of World War II. In the years before World War II, communism gained acceptance in Soviet Russia, and this new ideology was seen as a threat by many European nations. Moreover, nationalism also became popular among many countries, and this led to the development of more aggressive and extreme fascist governments.
Answer:
B. the rise of aggressive nationalism among some of the nations defeated in World War I
C. the rise of communism in Soviet Russia, which was seen as a threat by many European nations
Explanation:
Please help with number four
Answer:
Explanation:
C he is afraid of being caught there by the night watch
20 POINTS!!! What opinion about Russian society does Leo Tolstoy express in this excerpt from The Death of Ivan Ilyich?
The awful, terrible act of his dying was, he could see, reduced by those about him to the level of a casual, unpleasant, and almost indecorous incident (as if someone entered a drawing room defusing an unpleasant odour) and this was done by that very decorum which he had served all his life long. He saw that no one felt for him, because no one even wished to grasp his position. Only Gerasim recognized it and pitied him. And so Ivan Ilyich felt at ease only with him. He felt comforted when Gerasim supported his legs (sometimes all night long) and refused to go to bed, saying: "Don't you worry, Ivan Ilyich. I'll get sleep enough later on," or when he suddenly became familiar and exclaimed: "If you weren't sick it would be another matter, but as it is, why should I grudge a little trouble?" Gerasim alone did not lie; everything showed that he alone understood the facts of the case and did not consider it necessary to disguise them, but simply felt sorry for his emaciated and enfeebled master. Once when Ivan Ilyich was sending him away he even said straight out: "We shall all of us die, so why should I grudge a little trouble?"—expressing the fact that he did not think his work burdensome, because he was doing it for a dying man and hoped someone would do the same for him when his time came.
A.
The peasant class in nineteenth-century Russia was full of honest and compassionate people.
B.
Educated professionals gained influence in Russian society in the nineteenth century.
C.
In the nineteenth century, middle-class Russians were rich and well-educated.
D.
Peasants more readily accepted unpleasant facts of life, while the middle class tried to deny them.
Answer: D (PROBABLY)
Explanation:
A is wrong, because not all of the peasant class in the nineteenth century Russia was filled with honest and compassionate people. That can just be an opinion of someone.
B is wrong. Not all educated professionals gained influence in Russian society in the nineteenth century. Also, the text doesn’t talk about that much.
C is wrong, because not every middle class Russian were rich and well educated, it’s not a proven fact.
Peasants more readily accepted unpleasant facts of life, while the middle class tried to deny them. This is the opinion about Russian society. Therefore, the correct option is option D.
What is an excerpt?
An excerpt is indeed a quotation from that other resource that the author introduces with fresh language in a sentence. This phrase is taken from Thomas Jefferson's 1801 inaugural speech: As he warned his audience, "I may often go wrong by defect of judgement," Jefferson admitted the fallibility of human nature. "I shall frequently err through lack of judgement" is the excerpt.
This is a brief passage from a lengthy work, hence being an excerpt first from Declaration of Independence: "When it comes to necessary for one nation to cut the political ties that have bound them to another, and also to assume among powers of the world," says the philosopher Aristotle. Peasants more readily accepted unpleasant facts of life, while the middle class tried to deny them. This is the opinion about Russian society.
Therefore, the correct option is option D.
To know more about excerpt, here:
https://brainly.com/question/4101236
#SPJ7
What is the importance of the symbolism of The symbolism of the armor of the Greek and Trojans
Answer: The armor symbolizes love, so they are not eager to give it up.
The armor of the Greeks and Trojans was a potent symbol, carrying significant meanings about the individual's identity, social status, and cultural belonging. Not only did it serve a protective function, but it also symbolized the power, religious significance, and artistic sensibilities of these ancient societies.
Explanation:The symbolism of the armor of the Greeks and Trojans represents numerous societal and cultural aspects. Armor was not simply a means of protection in battle; it was a potent symbol carrying significant cultural and individual meanings.
For instance, the Greeks and Trojans, as depicted in the Iliad, were described as heroic figures, each with their distinct armor that emphasized their individuality and heroic stature. The armor of the Greeks and Trojans was associated with their identity, valor, and status. The intricacies of the armor design provide insight into the aesthetic and artistic sensibilities of these cultures, showcasing their advancements in craftsmanship and technology.
Symbolism plays an important role by assigning deeper meanings to physical objects. Similarly, in the context of the Greek and Trojan armor, the armor symbolized more than physical protection; it embodied the individual's social status, honor, and personal and cultural identity. For example, the labrys or double ax, a common weapon and symbol in these societies, signified power and religious significance.
Learn more about the Symbolism of Armor
https://brainly.com/question/12578938
#SPJ12
Read the passage.
(1) State leaders must ensure the safety of all citizens by stopping the construction of landfills. (2) Piles of garbage in an area close to homes can cause harmful diseases. (3) My uncle lived very close to a landfill and recently became very ill. (4) I am certain that many of his neighbors have also suffered due to the harmful nature of the landfill.
What is the most accurate analysis of the reason presented in the second sentence?
The reason is logically sound, because the writer is expressing a fact that has been proven.
The reason is logically sound, because the writer validates the reason with empirical evidence.
The reason is not logically sound, because the writer does not include strong factual evidence.
The reason is not logically sound, because the writer does not connect the reason to the claim.
Answer:
Explanation:
I believe its the second to last one because the passage doesn't state clear evidence to support the claim
Answer:
The reason is not logically sound, because the writer does not include strong factual evidence.
Explanation:
Even though the writer suggests what should be done about construction of landfills and describes their potential risks (totally valid), he/she does not directly provide with factual evidence that can demonstrate the link between his/her uncle disease and the landfill. This argument is based just on assumptions.
how does Wiesel feel about the United States in this passage from “The Perils of Indifference”?
a) angry that the united states didn’t do more to stop what was happening
b) confused about why the Jews don’t like the United States
c) sad that the greatest u.s. president passed away
d) grateful that the united states did all that it could help him
a) angry that the united states didn’t do more to stop what was happening
Answer:
a) angry that the united states didn’t do more to stop what was happening
Explanation:
Elie Wiesel's "The Perils of Indifference" Speech Elie Wiesel, a Noble Peace Prize champ and Boston University Professor, displayed a discourse as a feature of the Millennium Lecture Series at the White House on April 12, 1999. President Bill Clinton and his better half Hillary Clinton facilitated the formal address arrangement. Various dignitaries from a wide exhibit of open, private and outside office went to the occasion. In spite of the fact that Elie Wiesel planned his discourse to induce, it really fell fairly outside the deliberative class classification, as being more non-run of the mill inside this sort class.
The speech is one of a kind such that falls it into a sort arrangement considered as a hybrid deliberative genre.
Petrarch believed Christian scholars should study writers of pagan Rome because _________________.
Answer: He believed there was a cultural continuum from pagan to Christian Rome.
Answer:
Petrarch believed Christian scholars should study writers of pagan Rome because he believed there was a cultural continuum from pagan to Christian Rome.
Explanation:
Petrarch was a devout Christian and saw no conflict between the realization of human potential and religious faith. And, because of this lack of conflict, he had opinions that were quite dissonant with the way of thinking of his time. He is also considered the father of humanism, which also as a secularist root.
Why does the author use third-person point of view in this excerpt?
Final answer:
The author uses third-person point of view to create an all-knowing, objective narrator that can describe characters and actions comprehensively, establish the significance of the central character, and conform to academic writing standards.
Explanation:
The author uses third-person point of view in the given excerpt to create a narrator who is all-knowing and objective. This point of view utilizes pronouns such as 'he', 'she', 'it', 'them', and 'their', to provide a comprehensive overview of the characters and actions within a story.
In the particular excerpt, the third-person point of view allows the narrator to describe the central character, Catherine Morland, in great detail, indicating her importance in the novel without the bias that would come from a first-person perspective. This method also aligns with academic and professional writing standards, instructing the reader while remaining objective. The use of third-person can be seen as a way to focus the reader on the narrative and the characters rather than the personal views of the author, making the writing more accessible and informative.
pls help!!! i will make the first to answer the brainliest!! ASAP
So his father gave him fifty ships, fully manned, and Patroclus to go with him for his friend and sword-companion. And his mother, weeping still, armed him in his father's armor; glorious war gear that Hephaestus, the smith of the gods, had made for him. And he sailed to join the black ships on their way to Troy.
Write two sentences that explain what text evidence tells you about Achilles's culture.
Answer:
This evidence shows that war and bravery are important in Achilles's ancient Greek society. He is given men and ships to go to war and although his mother weeps when she sends him off it portrays a sense of bravery in Achilles.
Sample Response: The evidence shows Achilles commanding fifty ships. In his culture, it is important to be able to fight over land and sea.
When I refer to integrity, I have something very specific in mind. Integrity, as I will use the term, requires three steps: discerning what is right and what is wrong; acting on what you have discerned, even at personal cost; and saying openly that you are acting on your understanding of right and wrong. The first criterion captures the idea that integrity requires a degree of moral reflectiveness. The second brings in the ideal of a person of integrity as steadfast, a quality that includes keeping one’s commitments. The third reminds us that a person of integrity can be trusted.
Source: Carter, Stephen L. “The Insufficiency of Honesty.” Atlantic Monthly Feb. 1996: 74+. Print.
Based on the passage above, which of the following reflects the correct use of quotation marks?
“When I refer to integrity,” I have something specific in mind, states Carter.
Carter states that the first criterion states that integrity requires a degree of “moral reflectiveness.”
“acting on what you have discerned is one of the “three steps” of Carter’s definition of integrity.”
According to Carter, integrity “includes keeping one’s commitments.”
Answer:
Based on the passage above the correct use of the quotation mark is given below.
* Carter states that the first criterion states that integrity requires a degree of "moral reflectiveness".
In this sentence the the portion of quotation mark indicates the proper use quotation.
Explanation:
Why does Churchill believe an invasion of British soil is not likely to occur in
the near future?
Answer:
because the enemy could not keep its troops supplied from such a great distance
Explanation:
Answer: because the enemy would have to cross the heavily guarded sea to get there.
Explanation: In his speech given in 1940 Churchill said that an invasion of Britain was difficult because the enemy would have several obstacles from the British Navy. The enemy would need a large army to cross the English channel and it would be intercepted before achieving its goal. That was why, for Churchill, it was not likely to happen.
What does the prologue foreshadow in the play ?
last one makes the most sense out of the available options
Answer:
The families will pay for their feud with their children's lives
Explanation:
The play shows a sad account of event between two families. It shows how the parents eventually pay for the children's feuds. In this tragedy, there is loss of life due to misunderstandings and misrepresentation of information. The quotation from the poem:
"From forth the fatal loins of those two foes"
shows how the outcome or end result will be. In the end, parents will be heavily involved as they try to address the crisis.
Rainsford's character can best be described as
A) angry
B) determined
C) fearful
D) wounded
B determined I think
Rainsford's character can best be described as determined.
Which sentence in this excerpt from mark twain‘s “the 1,000,000 bank note” is an example of satire
Answer:
An example of satire here is: "Those two old brothers had been having a pretty hot argument a couple of days before, and had ended by agreeing to decide it by a bet, which is the English way of settling everything"
Explanation:
When we talk about a satire, we need to know that is a technique that authors used to express humor, exaggeration, irony or to expose or ridicule people's behavior or vices. Here we have some irony in the sentence especially in this part: "which is the English way of settling everything" Here he is making fun of the way that English people resolve their problems. He is trying to say that problems are serious and to resolve them you need more than just a bet.
Answer:
Those two old brothers had been having a pretty hot argument a couple of days before, and had ended by agreeing to decide it by a bet, which is the English way of settling everything
Explanation:
can you please help me to give information about Jean vanier. in paragraph.
Answer: Done!
Explanation:
Jean Vanier was born on September 10, 1928. He is a Canadian Catholic philosopher turned theologian. He also founded the L'Arche, an international federation of group homes for people with developmental disabilities and those who assist them. He grew up in Geneva, Switzerland, where his father was serving as a Canadian diplomat. Jean was educated in England and Canada and grew up speaking both French and English.
First off,
- Jean Vanier was born on: September 10, 1928, in Geneva, Switzerland and died on May 7, 2019, in Paris, France.
he founded L'Arche, an international federation of communities for people with developmental disabilities and those who assist them.
Vanier was the son of Canadian parents, Major-General Georges Vanier, who became the 19th Governor General of Canada (1959–1967), and his wife Pauline Vanier. He was the fourth out of five of his sibilants. He also received a broad education in English and French first in Canada and then in France and England.
This excerpt helps resolve the plot by revealing Dr. Jekyll’s conflicts
Answer:
This excerpt assists in resolving the plot by revealing Dr. Jekyll’s conflicts with nature that caused him to withdraw inside himself since from the start, it was talking about how he has degraded his own faults, which in this case, made him, him. At the end of it, he was driven to reflect deeply.
Explanation:
Final answer:
Conflicts in literature, like those faced by Dr. Jekyll or Mark Twain's character, drive the narrative and build tension through rising action, culminating in the climax where themes and messages are often developed.
Explanation:
The excerpt regarding Dr. Jekyll's conflicts helps resolve the plot by revealing the internal struggles that the character faces. Similarly, in the passage from Mark Twain's work, the conflict is established when Twain's initial confidence in running a crossing is shattered as Mr. Bixby sends more people to make him nervous, leading to self-doubt. In literature, such as in Jack London's The Call of the Wild and in the story of Goodman Brown, conflict drives the narrative forward, cresting in the climax where characters confront their greatest struggles. This not only builds the reader's interest but also allows authors to develop rich themes and messages. For example, Twain's anecdote suggests the theme of relying on one's own knowledge and training. In the case of Victor from Shelley's Frankenstein, the conflict between his goals and the reality of his creation leads to a moral dilemma. This intricate web of internal and external conflicts builds the tension in a story, forming an integral part of the rising action.
You have been asked to deliver a speech to a group of foreign exchange students from France and Germany. You do not speak German or French, but in the beginning of your speech you would like to welcome them in their native language. Which techniques should you follow to ensure a positive response from the audience?
A) Find a translating dicitonary and phonetically sound out the words.
B) Have a translator waiting in case the audience does not seem to understand.
C) Speak quietly so if you make a mistake it will be less noticeable to the audience.
D) Have someone knowledgeable in the language help you practice the correct pronunciation.
Answer:
D) Have someone knowledgeable in the language help you practice the correct pronunciation.
Explanation:
To make a positive impression when delivering a speech in French and German, use a translating dictionary, possibly have a translator on standby, but most importantly, have someone proficient in the languages help you practice your pronunciation. The goal is to properly and respectfully convey welcome messages in their native language.
Explanation:To ensure a positive response from your French and German audience, all of the approaches listed can be useful, but the most effective strategies would be to find a translating dictionary and phonetically sound out the words, have a translator ready in case of misunderstandings, and more crucially, have someone knowledgeable in the language help you practice the correct pronunciation.
Using a translating dictionary will provide you with the basic words or phrases you need, while phonetic pronunciation guides can help you speak the words more accurately. Having a translator on standby can be useful, but if you practice well, you won't need them during your speech. The most valuable solution is option D as practicing with someone proficient in the language can rectify your pronunciation and tone, making you sound more natural and respectful to the foreign audience. Remember, the objective here is not just to get the words right but also to convey your respect for their culture and language.
Learn more about Delivering a Speech in a Foreign Language here:https://brainly.com/question/33856112
#SPJ2
Which is an expository writing prompt? A) Describe your favorite holiday memory. B) Tell about a time when you were terrified. C) Explain the consequences of skipping classes. D) Write a letter to convince the principal to approve a field day
C) Explain the consequences of skipping classes
Hope this helps you
Have a great day
☆ Dont forget to mark brainliest ☆
Your answer would be C) Explain the consequences of skipping classes.
Expository writing is used to inform.
How does war change people?
Hey there!
Quick joke for you, what's green and has wheels? Grass...I lied about the wheels.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anyways, war can change people in many different ways. From PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder) to surreal memories.
After a war, soldiers can sometimes come back with syndromes, as scientists call it, that can put them on edge and make them feel like they are still in a warzone. Most of the time, this can change, but with devastating results.
For regular civillians, bad memories or even can hallucinations can occur. This can sometimes end with them taking their life or severe depression.
I'm open to any question or comment!
God Bless!
Brainlyest?
-X8lue83rryX
War changes people and societies by causing loss of life, disrupting social and economic structures, and leading to profound psychological impacts. It destroys infrastructures, halts education, and economic development, leaving long-term repercussions. Though the nature of war has evolved, its detrimental effects on individuals and societies persist.
Explanation:War profoundly alters the lives of individuals and societies in various ways. It leads to immediate and long-lasting social, economic, and psychological impacts. The immediate effects are often the loss of life, both military and civilian, which can decimate families and alter the demographics of entire communities. For example, the aftermath of World War I worsened Germany's economy, paving the way for political upheaval and the rise of Hitler. Similarly, the American Civil War forced many women into prostitution as they lost their primary breadwinners.
War also disrupts social networks and community structures, leading to a breakdown of the social fabric. Immigrants and refugees, in particular, may face traumatic events that dismantle family and social bonds. Psychological effects such as helplessness, damaged trust, and shame can emerge from these experiences. Furthermore, the nature of warfare has evolved with technology, changing how wars are fought but not eliminating their devastating effects on society.
Economically, wars disrupt growth and can set countries back decades, destroying infrastructure, halting education and technological advancements. It is recognized that war benefits a minor sector, such as arms dealers, while the majority suffer its consequences. Despite changes in warfare, the essence of its impact—changing demographics, shattered psyches, and stunted growth—remains constant.
Decide if the statement is written in standard English. If the statement is in standard English, select "True." If it is not in standard English, select "False."
17.
Singing in the treetops, I saw a robin.
True
False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Hope this helps
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Which is the correct definition of the term “foot” as it is used in poetry?
the basic unit of meter in poetry
parts of stressed and unstressed words
arrangement of stressed and unstressed words
arrangement of stressed and unstressed words
Answer:
is C
Explanation:
.
in PERCY JACKSON where is the 3rd pearl?
Answer:
The third pearl is located in the Lotus Casino in Las Vegas.
Explanation:
Answer: is located in the Lotus Casino in Las Vegas.
Explanation:
Type the pronoun and the noun it replaces. John is shorter than his brother. Pronoun: Noun:
Pronoun: his
noun : brother
Answer:
Explanation:
The absolutely correct way of saying this with no pronouns is John is shorter than John's brother.
It should be apparent what the answer is
his: John
In The Necklace, which quote best describes Madame Loisel’s husband’s desire to make his wife happy?
Question 20 options:
a)
“But one evening her husband reached home with a triumphant air and holding a large envelope in his hand.”
b)
“Very well. I will give you four hundred francs. And try to have a pretty gown.”
c)
“‘How stupid you are!’ her husband cried. ‘Go look up your friend, Madame Forestier, and ask her to lend you some jewels.’”
d)
“Her husband worked evenings, making up a tradesman’s accounts, and late at night he often copied manuscript for five sous a page.”
Answer:
b) “Very well. I will give you four hundred francs. And try to have a pretty gown.”
Explanation:
From the beginning of the novel, we can see that Madame Loisel was unhappy due to her desire to be wealthy, and the husband does everything within his power to satisfy his wife. The husband went as far as falling into debt just to satisfy the wife but she is just the type that is never satisfied with anything.
So, the husband saying “Very well. I will give you four hundred francs. And try to have a pretty gown.” was just to pleased her and it summarize how much the husband love his wife.
The quote that best illustrates Monsieur Loisel's attempt to please his wife in 'The Necklace' is 'Very well. I will give you four hundred francs. And try to have a pretty gown.' It shows his understanding of his wife's unhappiness with their financial situation and his efforts to alleviate that discomfort.
Explanation:In Guy de Maupassant's short story, The Necklace, the quote that best represents Monsieur Loisel's desire to make his wife happy is option b): 'Very well. I will give you four hundred francs. And try to have a pretty gown.' This statement shows Monsieur Loisel's willingness to sacrifice his own desires so that Madame Loisel can own an exquisite dress she wishes for. His words imply his understanding of his wife's dissatisfaction with their financial state, and his effort to improve that, thus demonstrating his efforts to make his wife content.
Learn more about The Necklace here:https://brainly.com/question/32690988
#SPJ6
An inference is a conclusion that adds what you know to the
Answer:
information in the text
Explanation:
Inference is an educated guess based on some information. Since an educated guess is a guess based on knowledge, it fits the definition given in the question perfectly:
An inference is a conclusion that adds what you know to the information in the text.
Answer:
Information in the Text
Explanation:
Got 100 on the test
According to Mira Keller, "The death penalty is a cruel and unjust form of punishment."
How can you change this example to better follow the rules of quotations?
Make the “T” in “The” lowercase. This makes the example:
According to Mira Keller, "the death penalty is a cruel and unjust form of punishment."
Identify the type of error in the sentence. If the sentence contains no error, select C. A catalyst is where a chemical begins the reaction but does not participate in it incorrect adverb clause placement
misplaced modifier
lack of parallel structure
dangling modifier
C
Answer: incorrect adverb clause placement
Explanation:
The adverb "where" is an adverb of place that expresses where something happens. A catalyst is a word that expresses concrete nouns (in this case, a substance that causes or speeds up a chemical reaction without being affected). Therefore, the clause has an incorrect adverb clause placement. You can fix this sentence by changing it. For instance: A catalyst is a substance which begins the reaction, but does not participate in it. (the adverbial clause immediately after the noun that is being modified)
Hamlet is the only character who sees King Hamlet's ghost throughout the play. true or false?
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Answer:
False
Explanation:
In Hamlet, the ghost of the murdered King Hamlet appears a few times. However, although his son Hamlet sees it, he is not the only one who sees the ghost. The ghost first appears to two soldiers, Bernardo and Marcellus, and Hamlet's friend Horatio, towards the beginning of the play. After this, the ghost appears to Hamlet on two occasions.
She swooned when she got a whiff of the harsh chemical. What does the bolded word mean? Question 5 options: she jumped She awoke she fled she fainted
The answer to your question is b.she awoke
Answer:
Choice D. (She fainted)
Explanation:
Got it right.
In The Phantom Tollbooth, Milo's experiences in the tollbooth will most likely affect his overall perspective by
A. making him find life more boring.
B. helping him feel dislike for the real world.
C. helping him find life more interesting.
D. making him feel the same as he did before.
The answer is C. He could now find more time to occupy hisself. Can I get brainliest
Answer:
C. helping him find life more interesting.
Explanation:
Milo, the primary character of "The Phantom Tollbooth" is a rich kid who finds no interest in anything he does or have. He is representative of the typical bored kid who takes no interest in all that he does or is taught. His room is full of toys but he doesn't play with them. When an unknown friend gifts him a tollbooth, he started travelling to imaginary lands. From there, he realized a newfound interest in the surrounding and the real world. He became practically impressed and interested in everything.
Read the passage. (1) The Yearling is one of my favorite novels.(2) It is by Marjorie Kinnan Rawlings. (3) It is about a yearling, which is a young deer, or fawn. (4) It takes place in Florida during the 1870s. (5) It has an interesting plot. (6) A boy named Jody finds the yearling during a hunting trip. (7) Jody’s father, Penny, had shot the fawn’s mother without realizing that it had a baby. (8) Jody feels sorry for the orphan and brings it to the family farm. (9) Jody loves his pet, but his parents start to hate it after it begins eating the family’s crops. (10) Penny finally orders Jody to get rid of the deer because it is destructive, but Jody refuses to obey his father. Which is the most effective way to vary the sentences in the passage? Lengthen sentence 10 by adding detail to it. Combine sentences 8 and 9. Start sentences with different parts of speech.
Answer:
Lengthen sentence 10 by adding detail to it.
Answer: The most effective way to vary the sentences in the passage is to start sentences with different parts of speech.
Explanation: The passage provided is too repetitive, whcih means it fails at adding variety in its sentences. For example, all sentences from 2 to 5 start with the pronoun "it". Moreover, sentences 7, 8 and 9 begin with the word "Jody". This problem can be solved by starting sentences with different parts of speech: for instance, transitions, adverb phrases or prepositional phrases can be used to introduce these sentences.