What is the future value of ​$510 per year for 8 years compounded annually at 9 ​percent?

Answer:

$17,277.07

Step-by-step explanation:

Present value of annuity is the present worth of cash flow that is to be received in the future, if future value is known, rate of interest is r and time is n then PV of annuity is

PV of annuity = [tex]\frac{P[1-(1+r)^{-n}]}{r}[/tex]

                      = [tex]\frac{3000[1-(1+0.10)^{-9}]}{0.10}[/tex]

                      = [tex]\frac{3000[1-(1.10)^{-9}]}{0.10}[/tex]

                      = [tex]\frac{3000[1-0.4240976184]}{0.10}[/tex]

                      = [tex]\frac{3000(0.5759023816)}{0.10}[/tex]

                      = [tex]\frac{1,727.7071448}{0.10}[/tex]

                      = 17,277.071448 ≈ $17,277.07

(a+3)(a-2)

Multiply the two brackets together

a^2-2a+3a+3*-2

a^2+a-6

Answer is a^2+a-6

ANSWER

[tex]{a}^{2} + a - 6[/tex]

EXPLANATION

The given expression is

[tex](a + 3)(a - 2)[/tex]

We expand using the distributive property to obtain:

[tex]a(a - 2) + 3(a - 2)[/tex]

We multiply out the parenthesis to get:

[tex] {a}^{2} - 2a + 3a - 6[/tex]

Let us now simplify by combining the middle terms to obtain;

[tex]{a}^{2} + a - 6[/tex]

First confirm that [tex]y_1=xe^{-x}[/tex] is a solution to the ODE,

[tex]y''+2y'+y=0[/tex]

We have

[tex]{y_1}'=e^{-x}-xe^{-x}=(1-x)e^{-x}[/tex]

[tex]{y_1}''=-e^{-x}-(1-x)e^{-x}=(-2+x)e^{-x}[/tex]

Substituting into the ODE gives

[tex](-2+x)e^{-x}+2(1-x)e^{-x}+xe^{-x}=0[/tex]

Suppose [tex]y_2(x)=v(x)y_1(x)[/tex] is another solution to this ODE. Then

[tex]{y_2}'=v'y_1+v{y_1}'[/tex]

[tex]{y_2}''=v''y_1+2v'{y_1}'+v{y_1}''[/tex]

and substituting these into the ODE yields

[tex](v''y_1+2v'{y_1}'+v{y_1}'')+2(v'y_1+v{y_1}')+vy_1=0[/tex]

[tex]xe^{-x}v''+2e^{-x}v'=0[/tex]

[tex]xv''+2v'=0[/tex]

Let [tex]w(x)=v'(x)[/tex]. Then the remaining ODE is linear in [tex]w[/tex]:

[tex]xw'+2w=0[/tex]

Multiply both sides by the integrating factor, [tex]x[/tex], and condense the left hand side as a derivative of a product:

[tex]x^2w'+2xw=(x^2w)'=0[/tex]

Integrate both sides with respect to [tex]x[/tex] and solve for [tex]w[/tex]:

[tex]x^2w=C_1\implies w=C_1x^{-2}[/tex]

Back-substitute and integrate both sides with respect to [tex]x[/tex] to solve for [tex]v[/tex]:

[tex]v'=C_1x^{-2}\implies v=-C_1x^{-1}+C_2[/tex]

Back-substitute again to solve for [tex]y_2[/tex]:

[tex]\dfrac{y_2}{y_1}=C_2-\dfrac{C_1}x[/tex]

[tex]\implies y_2=C_2xe^{-x}-C_1e^{-x}[/tex]

[tex]y_1[/tex] already captures the solution [tex]xe^{-x}[/tex], so the remaining one is

[tex]\boxed{y_2=e^{-x}}[/tex]

A differential equation shows the relationship between functions and their derivatives.

The equation of [tex]y_2(x)[/tex] is: [tex]y_2 = -e^{-x}[/tex]

The given parameters are:

[tex]y_2 = y_1(x) \int\frac{ e^{(\int -P(x)\ dx)} }{ y_1^2(x) }dx[/tex]

[tex]y" + 2y' + y = 0[/tex]

[tex]y_1 = xe^{-x}[/tex]

The general equation is:

[tex]y" + P(x) y' + Q(x)y = 0[/tex]

Compare the above equation to [tex]y" + 2y' + y = 0[/tex]

[tex]P(x) = 2[/tex]

Integrate:

[tex]\int\limits^x_0 P(x') dx'= \int\limits^x_0 2 dx'[/tex]

[tex]\int\limits^x_0 P(x') dx'= 2x|\limits^x_0[/tex]

[tex]\int\limits^x_0 P(x') dx'= 2[x - 0][/tex]

[tex]\int\limits^x_0 P(x') dx'= 2[x ][/tex]

[tex]\int\limits^x_0 P(x') dx'= 2x[/tex]

We have:

[tex]y_2 = y_1(x) \int\frac{ e^{(\int -P(x)\ dx)} }{ y_1^2(x) }dx[/tex]

The above equation becomes:

[tex]y_2 = y_1(x) \int\frac{e^{(\int -2 dx)} }{ y_1^2(x) }dx[/tex]

Substitute [tex]y_1 = xe^{-x}[/tex]

[tex]y_2 = xe^{-x} \int\frac{ e^{(\int -2 dx)} }{ (xe^{-x})^2 }dx[/tex]

Integrate

[tex]y_2 = xe^{-x} \int\frac{ e^{-2x}}{ (xe^{-x})^2 }dx[/tex]

Evaluate the exponents

[tex]y_2 = xe^{-x} \int\frac{ e^{-2x}}{ x^2e^{-2x} }dx[/tex]

Cancel out common factors

[tex]y_2 = xe^{-x} \int\frac{1}{ x^2 }dx[/tex]

Rewrite as:

[tex]y_2 = xe^{-x} \int x^{-2}dx[/tex]

Integrate

[tex]y_2 = xe^{-x} \times -\frac{1}{x} + c[/tex]

[tex]y_2 = -e^{-x} + c[/tex]

Set c to 0.

[tex]y_2 = -e^{-x} + 0[/tex]

[tex]y_2 = -e^{-x}[/tex]

Hence, the equation of [tex]y_2(x)[/tex] is:

[tex]y_2 = -e^{-x}[/tex]

Read more about differential equations at:

https://brainly.com/question/14620493

Answer:

Solution A: 120 ounces

Solution B: 30 ounces

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's call A the amount of Solution A. Solution A is 70% salt

Let's call B the amount of Solution B. Solution A is 95% salt

The resulting mixture should have 75% salt and 150 ounces .

Then we know that the total amount of mixture will be:

[tex]A + B = 150[/tex]

Then the total amount of salt in the mixture will be:

[tex]0.7A + 0.95B = 0.75 * 150[/tex]

[tex]0.7A + 0.95B = 112.5[/tex]

Then we have two equations and two unknowns so we solve the system of equations. Multiply the first equation by -0.95 and add it to the second equation:

[tex]-0.95A -0.95B = 150 * (-0.95)[/tex]

[tex]-0.95A -0.95B =-142.5[/tex]

[tex]-0.95A -0.95B =-142.5[/tex]

                      +

[tex]0.7A + 0.95B = 112.5[/tex]

--------------------------------------

[tex]-0.25A = -30[/tex]

[tex]A = \frac{-30}{-0.25}[/tex]

[tex]A = 120\ ounces[/tex]

We substitute the value of A into one of the two equations and solve for B.

[tex]120 + B = 150[/tex]

[tex]B = 30\ ounces[/tex]

Answer:

see attachment

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the second shift theorem, the inverse Laplace transform of (e^{-3s}) / (s² + 2s - 3) is the convolution of 1 with e^{-4t}, yielding e^{-4t} as the inverse transform.

To find the inverse Laplace transform of (e^{-3s}) / (s² + 2s - 3) using the second shift theorem, we first need to consider the standard form of the second shift theorem: L(e^{at}y(t)) = Y(s-a).

Given that the numerator of our function is e^{-3s}, this implies a shift in the function y(t) by 3 units to the right in the time domain.

Next, we factor the denominator to find its roots: s² + 2s - 3 factors into (s+3)(s-1). Hence, we can rewrite the denominator as a product of first-order terms.

Now, by shifting the transform back by 3 units using the second shift theorem, we obtain the inverse Laplace transform L^{-1}{1/(s+3-(-3))(s-1-(-3))} = L^{-1}{1/s(s+4)}.

This further translates to the convolution of the inverse transforms of 1/s and 1/(s+4), which correspond to the functions 1 and e^{-4t}, respectively, in the time domain.

Thus, the inverse Laplace transform sought is the convolution of 1 with e^{-4t}, which is e^{-4t}.

Answer:

1. Y

2. N

3. N

4. N

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's use the second equation, since it seems to be easier to use.

To check if an ordered pair is a solution, plug it in to the equation.

1. [tex]-10+18=8[/tex] --> Y

2. [tex]25-12=13[/tex] --> N

3. [tex]0-9=-9[/tex] --> N

4. [tex]35-27=8[/tex] --> N

Edit : The 4th equation doesn't work for the first equation, whereas the first one still does.

Answer:

(-2,-6)

Step-by-step explanation:

-9x +2y = 6

5x - 3y = 8

1) Make one of the coefficients the same - y.

-9x +2y = 6 * 3

5x - 3y = 8 * 3

-27x +6y = 18

10x - 6y = 16

2) Add the new equations.

(-27x +6y = 18) + (10x - 6y = 16)

(-27x +6y) + (10x - 6y) = 18 + 16

-17x = 34

3) Divide to find the value of x

-17x = 34

x = 34/-17

x = -2

4) Substitute x into either equation to find the value of y.

-9(-2) +2y = 6

18 +2y = 6

2y = -12

y = -12/2

y = -6

5(-2) - 3y = 8

-10 - 3y = 8

-3y = 18

y = 18/-3

y = -6

Your answer is (-2,-6).

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

A ratio is defined as a comparison of two amounts by division.It is of the form of [tex]\frac{p}{q}[/tex] where p and q are the quantities.

A. 1580 people/square mile in division form

1580[tex]\frac{people}{\text{square mile}}[/tex]

This satisfies ratio definition as this compares two quantities People and Square mile and is of the form   [tex]\frac{p}{q}[/tex]

Where,

p: People, q:  Square mile

Example,

[tex]\frac{1580\times people}{1\times squaremile}[/tex]

expresses that per 1 square mile there are 1580 people. Thus rate satisfies the ratio definition.

B. 360 kilowatt-hour/4 months

in division form [tex]\frac{\text{360 kilowatt-hour}}{\text{4months}}[/tex]

This satisfies ratio definition as this compares two quantities kilowatt-hour and months and is of the form   [tex]\frac{p}{q}[/tex]

where, p: kilowatt-hour and q: people

Example,

[tex]\frac{\360\times kilowatt-hour}{4\times months}[/tex]

expresses that per 4 months there are 360 kilowatt-hour. Thus, rate satisfies the ratio definition.

C. 450 people/year

In division form 450[tex]\frac{people}{year}[/tex]

This satisfies ratio definition as this compares two quantities people and year and is of the form   [tex]\frac{p}{q}[/tex]

where, p: people and q: year

Example,

[tex]\frac{450\times people}{1\times\text{year}}[/tex]

expresses that per year there are 450 people. Thus, rate satisfies the ratio definition.

D. 355 calories/6 ounces

In division form [tex]\frac{355clories}{6ounces}[/tex]

This satisfies ratio definition as this compares two quantities calories and ounces and is of the form   [tex]\frac{p}{q}[/tex]

where p: calories and q: ounces

Example,

[tex]\frac{355\times calories}{6\times\text{ounces}}[/tex]

expresses that per 6 ounces there are 355 calories. Thus, rate satisfies the ratio definition.

Answer: Hence, Option 'B' is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we have given that

Number of births = 1400

Number of birth of girls = 1378

Number of birth of boys is given by

[tex]1400-1378\\\\=22[/tex]

so, the number of girls is significantly higher than the number of boys.

So, the number of births of girls is significantly high.

Hence, Option 'B' is correct.

B. The number of girls is significantly high.

When evaluating whether the number of girl births in a sample is significantly high or low, we can reference the expected natural ratio of girls to boys, which is typically 100:105. Given that in the scenario 1378 out of 1400 births were girls, this significantly deviates from the expected natural ratio. For comparison, an article in Newsweek states that the natural ratio is 100:105, and in China, it is 100:114, which equals 46.7 percent girls. If we consider a sample where out of 150 births, there are 60 girls (or 40%), this is lower than the expected percentage based on China's statistics but not implausible. However, in the case of the scenario with 1378 girls out of 1400 births, the proportion of girls is approximately 98.43%, which seems very unlikely given the natural ratio, suggesting an unusual or non-random process may be involved.

Therefore, based on subjective judgment and without applying more precise statistical tests, the number of girls being 1378 out of 1400 births is significantly high compared to natural birth rates or the stated birth rate in China. This leads us to select the correct answer: B. The number of girls is significantly high.

Answer:

  12.683%

Step-by-step explanation:

The effective annual rate is given by ...

  (1 +r/n)^n -1

where r is the nominal annual rate, and n is the number of compoundings per year. Filling in the given numbers, we have ...

  effective rate = (1 +0.12/12)^12 -1 ≈ 0.12683 = 12.683%

Answer:

Option D: [tex]7.59*10^{2}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

we know that

The volume of Saturn is about [tex]8.27*10^{14}\ km^{3}[/tex]

The volume of Earth is about [tex]1.09*10^{12}\ km^{3}[/tex]

Dividing Saturn's volume by Earth's volume

[tex]\frac{8.27*10^{14}}{1.09*10^{12}} =(\frac{8.27}{1.09})*10^{14-12} =7.59*10^{2}[/tex]

The correct answer is option D. The quotient in scientific notation is [tex]75.9 \times 10^2[/tex]

To find the number of Earths that can fit inside Saturn, we divide the volume of Saturn by the volume of Earth. Given the volumes:

Saturn's volume [tex]= 8.27 \times 10^{26}\ km^3[/tex]

Earth's volume [tex]= 1.09 \times 10^{24}\ km^3[/tex]

The calculation is as follows:

Number of Earths in Saturn = Saturn's volume / Earth's volume

[tex]=\frac{ (8.27 \times 10^{26})} {(1.09 \times 10^{24})}[/tex]

To simplify this, we divide the coefficients and subtract the exponents of 10:

[tex]= \frac{8.27}{ 1.09} \times \frac{10^{26}} { 10^{24}}[/tex]

[tex]= 7.59 \times 10^2[/tex]

The probability of passing at least one is:

              0.72

Let A denote the event that the student passed in history subject.

Let B denote the event that the student passed in math subject.

Then A∪B denote the event that he passed in atleast one.

A∩B denote the event that he passed in both.

We know that:

[tex]P(A\bigcup B)=P(A)+P(B)-P(A\bigcap B)[/tex]

From the ques we have:

[tex]P(A)=0.54\\\\P(B)=0.61\\\\and\\\\P(A\bigcap B)=0.43[/tex]

Hence, we get:

[tex]P(A\bigcup B)=0.54+0.61-0.43\\\\P(A\bigcup B)=0.72[/tex]

                   Hence, the answer is:

                             0.72

Answer:

The annual rate of interest is 650 %.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given,

The amount of loan = $ 552,

Total amount paid after one month = $ 851,

So, the interest for one month = $ 851 -$ 552 = $ 299,

Thus, the monthly interest = [tex]\frac{\text{Interest for a month}}{\text{Total amount of loan}}\times 100[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{299}{552}\times 100[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{29900}{552}[/tex]

Since, 1 year = 12 month ⇒ 1 month = 1/12 year,

Hence, the annual rate of interest = [tex]\frac{29900}{552}\times 12=\frac{358800}{552}=650\%[/tex]

Answer:

650.2%

Step-by-step explanation:

We have to calculate annual interest rate by this formula :

A = P( 1 + rt )

A = Future value of loan ( $851 )

P = Principal amount ( $552 )

r = Rate of interest

t = Time in years

As we know,  1 year = 12 months . By converting 1 month to year we get

1 month = [tex]\frac{1}{12}[/tex] year = 0.0833 year

Now we put the values in the formula

$851 = $552( 1 + r × 0.0833 )

= [tex]\frac{851}{552} =\frac{552(1+(0.0833r))}{552}[/tex]

= 1.5417 = 1 + 0.0833r

= 1.5417 - 1 = 0.0833r

= 0.5417 = 0.0833r

r = 6.502

r is in decimal form so we have to multiply with 100 to convert the  value in percentage.

6.502 × 100 = 650.2%

The annual interest rate that you pay is 650.2%

The work is equal to the line integral of [tex]\vec F[/tex] over each line segment.

Parameterize the paths

The work done by [tex]\vec F[/tex] over each segment (call them [tex]C_1,\ldots,C_4[/tex]) is

[tex]\displaystyle\int_{C_1}\vec F\cdot\mathrm d\vec r_1=\int_0^2\vec0\cdot\vec\imath\,\mathrm dt=0[/tex]

[tex]\displaystyle\int_{C_2}\vec F\cdot\mathrm d\vec r_2=\int_0^1(t^2\,\vec\imath+24t\,\vec\jmath+32t^2\,\vec k)\cdot(4\,\vec\jmath+\vec k)\,\mathrm dt=\int_0^1(96t+32t^2)\,\mathrm dt=\frac{176}3[/tex]

[tex]\displaystyle\int_{C_3}\vec F\cdot\mathrm d\vec r_3=\int_0^2(\vec\imath+(24-12t)\,\vec\jmath+32\,\vec k)\cdot(-\vec\imath)\,\mathrm dr=-\int_0^2\mathrm dt=-2[/tex]

[tex]\displaystyle\int_{C_4}\vec F\cdot\mathrm d\vec r_4=\int_0^1((1-t)^2\,\vec\imath+2(4-4t)^2\,\vec k)\cdot(-4\,\vec\jmath-\vec k)\,\mathrm dt=-2\int_0^1(4-4t)^2\,\mathrm dt=-\frac{32}3[/tex]

Then the total work done by [tex]\vec F[/tex] over the particle's path is 46.

The total work done by the force field as the particle follows this path is 4/3 units of work.

To find the total work done by the force field as the particle moves along the path, we'll calculate the line integrals for each segment and then sum them up:

For the first segment (from the origin to (2, 0, 0)):

Parameterization: r1(t) = (2t, 0, 0), t from 0 to 1.

Work on this segment: ∫[0,1] F(r1(t)) · r1'(t) dt

F(r1(t)) = (0, 0, 0), as z = 0.

r1'(t) = (2, 0, 0).

∫[0,1] F(r1(t)) · r1'(t) dt = ∫[0,1] (0) dt = 0.

For the second segment (from (2, 0, 0) to (2, 4, 1)):

Parameterization: r2(t) = (2, 4t, t), t from 0 to 1.

Work on this segment: ∫[0,1] F(r2(t)) · r2'(t) dt

F(r2(t)) = (t^2, 0, 8t^2).

r2'(t) = (0, 4, 1).

∫[0,1] F(r2(t)) · r2'(t) dt = ∫[0,1] (0 + 0 + 8t^2) dt = ∫[0,1] 8t^2 dt = [8t^3/3] from 0 to 1 = (8/3).

For the third segment (from (2, 4, 1) to (0, 4, 1)):

Parameterization: r3(t) = (2 - 2t, 4, 1), t from 0 to 1.

Work on this segment: ∫[0,1] F(r3(t)) · r3'(t) dt

F(r3(t)) = (1, 0, 8).

r3'(t) = (-2, 0, 0).

∫[0,1] F(r3(t)) · r3'(t) dt = ∫[0,1] (-2) dt = [-2t] from 0 to 1 = -2.

For the fourth segment (from (0, 4, 1) back to the origin):

Parameterization: r4(t) = (0, 4 - 4t, 1), t from 0 to 1.

Work on this segment: ∫[0,1] F(r4(t)) · r4'(t) dt

F(r4(t)) = (1, 0, 32 - 8t).

r4'(t) = (0, -4, 0).

∫[0,1] F(r4(t)) · r4'(t) dt = ∫[0,1] (0 + 0 + 0) dt = 0.

Now, sum up the work done on each segment:

Total work = 0 + (8/3) - 2 + 0 = 4/3.

So, the total work done by the force field as the particle follows this path is 4/3 units of work.

https://brainly.com/question/29438379

#SPJ3

Answer:

quantitative

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

5x + 2 = 12

Subtract 2 from both sides

5x + 2 - 2 = 12 - 2

Simplifying

5x = 10

Divide both sides by 5

5x / 5 = 10/5

Simplifying

x = 2

Answer:

x = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

You are solving for the variable, x. Note the equal sign, what you do to one side, you do to the other. Do the opposite of PEMDAS, and isolate the variable.

First, subtract 2 from both sides.

5x + 2 = 12

5x + 2 (-2) = 12 (-2)

5x = 12 - 2

5x = 10

Isolate the variable, x. Divide 5 from both sides.

(5x)/5 = (10)/5

x = 10/5

x = 2

x = 2 is your answer.

~

Answer:

The expression equivalent to the given complex fraction is

[tex]\frac{-2x+5y}{3x-2y}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

An easy way to solve the complex fraction is to solve the numerator and denominator separately.

Numerator:

[tex]\frac{-2}{x} + \frac{5}{y}\\ = \frac{-2y + 5x}{xy}[/tex]

Denominator:

[tex]\frac{3}{y} + \frac{-2}{x}\\ = \frac{3x - 2y}{xy}[/tex]

Solving the complex fraction:

[tex][\frac{-2}{x} + \frac{5}{y}] / [\frac{3}{y} + \frac{-2}{x}]\\= [\frac{-2y + 5x}{xy}] / [\frac{3x - 2y}{xy}][/tex]

[tex]=\frac{-2y + 5x}{xy} * \frac{xy}{3x - 2y}[/tex]

Common terms in the numerator and denominator cancels each other(Cross multiplication) :

[tex]= \frac{-2y + 5x}{3x - 2y}[/tex]

Answer:

15.7 years

Step-by-step explanation:

we know that

The deforestation is a exponential function of the form

[tex]y=a(b)^{x}[/tex]

where

y ----> the number of trees still remaining in the forest

x ----> the number of years

a is the initial value (a=500,000 threes)

b is the base

b=100%-4.7%=95.3%=95.3/100=0.953

substitute

[tex]y=500,000(0.953)^{x}[/tex]

The linear equation of planting threes in the region is equal to

[tex]y=15,000x[/tex]

using a graphing tool

Solve the system of equations

The intersection point is (15.7,235,110)

see the attached figure

therefore

For x=15.7 years

The number of trees they have planted will be equal to the number of trees still remaining in the forest

Answer: There is only one solution, and it is viable.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

A⇒35 km/hr

B⇒25 km/hr

Step-by-step explanation:

Let us call them cyclist A and B.

The rate of cyclist A will be x km/h

The rate of cyclist B will be (x-10) km/h

The total distance traveled= 120 km

Time taken =2 hours

Relative speed, since they are travelling in different directions, is arrived at by addition of their individual speeds = {x+ (x-10)}km/hr (2x-10)km/hr

Distance =speed × time

120km = (2x-10)km/hr×2

120=4x-20

4x=140

x= 35 km/hr⇒ speed for cyclist A

B⇒ (x-10) km/hr=35-10=25 km/hr

The rate of the faster cyclist is 35 km/h and the rate of the slower cyclist is 25 km/h.

The context of this problem is based on understanding relative speed, also known as the rate at which two objects move away from each other when traveling in opposite directions. We know that the two cyclists are 120 km apart after 2 hours, meaning together they covered a total distance of 120 km.

Let's denote the speed of the faster cyclist as 'x' km/h and the speed of the slower cyclist as 'x - 10' km/h. As they are moving in opposite directions, their speeds add up, and we can use this to form an equation. For the total distance they covered, we can write it as time multiplied by their combined speed, which is (x + (x - 10)) km/h. Thus:

2 * (x + x - 10) = 120
This simplifies to:

2 * (2x - 10) = 120
When we solve for 'x', we get:

2x - 10 = 60
2x = 70
x = 35

Therefore, the rate of the faster cyclist is 35 km/h and the rate of the slower cyclist is '35 - 10' which is 25 km/h.

https://brainly.com/question/14362959

#SPJ3

Answer:

The wedge cut from the first octant ⟹ z ≥ 0 and y ≥ 0 ⟹ 12−3y^2 ≥ 0 ⟹ 0 ≤ y ≤ 2  

0 ≤ y ≤ 2 and x = 2-y ⟹ 0 ≤ x ≤ 2  

V = ∫∫∫ dzdydx  

dz has changed from zero to 12−3y^2  

dy has changed from zero to 2-x  

dx has changed from zero to 2  

V = ∫∫∫ dzdydx = ∫∫ (12−3y^2) dydx = ∫ 12(2-x)-(2-x)^3 dx =  

24(2)-6(2)^2+(2-2)^4/4 -(2-0)^4/4 = 20

Step-by-step explanation:

It can be deduced that the volume of the wedge cut from the first octant will be 20.

From the information, the wedge cut from the first octant will be z ≥ 0 and y ≥ 0 = 12−3y² ≥ 0 = 0 ≤ y ≤ 2  

Also, it can be deduced that 0 ≤ y ≤ 2 and x = 2-y ⟹ 0 ≤ x ≤ 2. Therefore, V = ∫dzdydx. In this case,

dz = 12−3y  

dy = 2-x  

dx = 2  

V = ∫dzdydx = ∫(12−3y²) dydx = ∫12(2-x)-(2-x)³dx

= [24(2) - 6(2)² + (2-2)⁴/4 -(2-0)⁴]/4

= 20

In conclusion, the volume of the wedge cut from the first octant will be 20.

Learn more about volume on:

https://brainly.com/question/12410983

Answer:

[tex]f'''(x)=\frac{3}{x^{2}}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given with Second-order derivative of function f(x).

[tex]f''(x)=9-\frac{3}{x}[/tex]

We need to find Third-order derivative of the function f(x).

[tex]f''(x)=9-\frac{3}{x}=9-3x^{-1}[/tex]

We know that,

f'''(x) = (f''(x))'

So,

[tex]f'''(x)=\frac{\mathrm{d}\,f''(x)}{\mathrm{d} x}[/tex]

[tex]f'''(x)=\frac{\mathrm{d}\,(9-3x^{-1})}{\mathrm{d} x}[/tex]

[tex]f'''(x)=\frac{\mathrm{d}\,9}{\mathrm{d} x}-\frac{\mathrm{d}\,3x^{-1}}{\mathrm{d} x}[/tex]

[tex]f'''(x)=0-3\frac{\mathrm{d}\,x^{-1}}{\mathrm{d} x}[/tex]

[tex]f'''(x)=-3(-1)x^{-1-1}[/tex]

[tex]f'''(x)=3x^{-2}[/tex]

[tex]f'''(x)=\frac{3}{x^{2}}[/tex]

Therefore, [tex]f'''(x)=\frac{3}{x^{2}}[/tex]

[tex]\sin(3x+13)=\cos(4x)\\\sin(3x+13)=\cos(90-4x)\\3x+13=90-4x\\7x=77\\x=11[/tex]

For this case we have the following expression:

[tex]p ^ 3 * p ^ 2 * p =[/tex]

By definition of multiplication of powers of the same base, we have to put the same base and add the exponents, that is:

[tex]a ^ n * a ^ m = a ^ {n + m}[/tex]

So:

[tex]p ^ 3 * p ^ 2 * p = p^{ 3 + 2 + 1} = p^6[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]p^6[/tex]

Answer:

a

Step-by-step explanation:

still a 10% chance for oscar

a) Oscar should look in forest A to maximize the probability of finding his dog on the first day. b) So, the probability that the dog is in forest A, given that Oscar looked in A on the first day but didn't find his dog, is [tex]\( \frac{1}{3} \)[/tex]. c) The probability that Oscar looked in forest A, given that he finds the dog on the first day, is approximately [tex]\(0.6579\)[/tex].

a) To maximize the probability of finding his dog on the first day, Oscar should choose the forest where the conditional probability of finding the dog on that day is higher.

For forest A:

Probability of finding the dog on the first day = Probability of the dog being in forest A × Conditional probability of finding the dog in forest A on the first day

[tex]\[ = 0.4 \times 0.25 = 0.1 \][/tex]

For forest B:

Probability of finding the dog on the first day = Probability of the dog being in forest B × Conditional probability of finding the dog in forest B on the first day

[tex]\[ = 0.6 \times 0.15 = 0.09 \][/tex]

Comparing these probabilities, Oscar should look in forest A to maximize the probability of finding his dog on the first day.

b) Given that Oscar looked in forest A on the first day but didn't find his dog, we need to find the conditional probability that the dog is in forest A.

Using Bayes' theorem:

[tex]\[ P(\text{Dog in A} | \text{Search in A, not found}) = \frac{P(\text{Search in A, not found} | \text{Dog in A}) \times P(\text{Dog in A})}{P(\text{Search in A, not found})} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ = \frac{(1 - 0.25) \times 0.4}{1 - (0.4 \times 0.25)} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ = \frac{0.75 \times 0.4}{1 - 0.1} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ = \frac{0.3}{0.9} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ = \frac{1}{3} \][/tex]

c) If Oscar flips a fair coin to determine where to look on the first day and finds the dog on the first day, we need to find the probability that he looked in forest A.

Let [tex]\( H \)[/tex] be the event that the coin flip resulted in heads (i.e., he looked in forest A), and [tex]\( D \)[/tex] be the event that he finds the dog on the first day.

Using Bayes' theorem again:

[tex]\[ P(H | D) = \frac{P(D | H) \times P(H)}{P(D)} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ = \frac{P(D | H) \times P(H)}{P(D | A) \times P(A) + P(D | B) \times P(B)} \][/tex]

Since he finds the dog on the first day, [tex]\( P(D) = P(D | A) \times P(A) + P(D | B) \times P(B) \)[/tex].

[tex]\[ P(D) = (0.25 \times 0.4) + (0.15 \times 0.6) \][/tex]

[tex]\[ P(D) = 0.1 + 0.09 \][/tex]

[tex]\[ P(D) = 0.19 \][/tex]

Now, substitute the values:

[tex]\[ P(H | D) = \frac{0.25 \times 0.5}{0.19} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ P(H | D) = \frac{0.125}{0.19} \][/tex]

[tex]\[ P(H | D) \approx 0.6579 \][/tex]

The complete question is

Oscar has lost his dog in either forest A (with a priori probability 0.4) or in forest B (with a priori probability 0.6). On any given day, if the dog is in A and Oscar spends a day searching for it in A, the conditional probability that he will find the dog that day is 0.25. Similarly, if the dog is in B and Oscar spends a day looking for it there, the conditional probability that he will find the dog that day is 0.15. The dog cannot go from one forest to the other. Oscar can search only in the daytime, and he can travel from one forest to the other only at night.

a) In which forest should Oscar look to maximize the probability he finds his dog on the first day of the search?

b) Given that Oscar looked in A on the first day but didn't find his dog, what is the probability that the dog is in A?

c) If Oscar flips a fair coin to determine where to look on the first day and finds the dog on the first day, what is the probability that he looked in A?

Answer:

  66.2

Step-by-step explanation:

We know that the middle 68% of the distribution is between -1 and +1 standard deviations from the mean. -1 standard deviation is a score of ...

  69.9 - 3.7 = 66.2

_____

Comment on the question

The way the question is worded, "A" can be any value less than 68.1, down to -∞. The question does does not require the A-B range to be symmetrical.

Answer: a. The proportion of the population is between 20 and 30 =0.2356

b. The  probability that a randomly chosen value will be between 30 and 40 =0.4680

Step-by-step explanation:

Given : Mean : [tex]\mu=35[/tex]

Standard deviation : [tex]\sigma = 8[/tex]

The formula to calculate z-score :-

[tex]z=\dfrac{x-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

For x= 20

[tex]z=\dfrac{20-35}{8}=-1.875[/tex]

For x= 30

[tex]z=\dfrac{30-35}{8}=-0.625[/tex]

For x= 40

[tex]z=\dfrac{40-35}{8}=0.625[/tex]

a.

[tex]P(20<x<30)=P(-1.875<z<-0.625)\\= P(-0.625)-P(-1.875)\\=0.2659855-0.0303964=0.2355891\approx0.2356[/tex]

b.

[tex]P(30<x<40)=P(-0.625<z<0.625)\\= P(0.625)-P(0.625)\\=0.7340144-0.2659855=0.4680289\approx0.4680[/tex]

We can use the pnorm() function in the R programming language to calculate the proportion of a population and the probability of a randomly chosen value in a normal distribution, giving us the proportion between 20 and 30, and the probability between 30 and 40.

In the R programming language, we can solve this problem by using the pnorm() function, which represents the cumulative distribution function for a normal distribution. The function pnorm(x, mean, sd) gives the probability that a normally distributed random number will be less than x.

To answer your questions:
a. What proportion of the population is between 20 and 30?

b. What is the probability that a randomly chosen value will be between 30 and 40?

https://brainly.com/question/34741155

#SPJ12

Intersecting chords theorem:

[tex]7\cdot7=10x[/tex]

i.e. when two chords intersect, the products of the resulting line segments' lengths are equal. Then

[tex]10x=49\implies x=\dfrac{49}{10}=\boxed{4.9}[/tex]

Answer:

4.9

Step-by-step explanation:

got it right

Answer:

Option C is correct

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to factorize the expression:

[tex]x^2+10x+24[/tex]

For factorization we need to break the middle term such that the product is equal to 24x^2 and the sum is equal to 10x

We know that 6*4 = 24 and 6+4 =10

So, solving

[tex]=x^2+6x+4x+24[/tex]

Taking common

[tex]=x(x+6)+4(x+6)[/tex]

[tex]=(x+4)(x+6)[/tex]

So, the factors of

[tex]x^2+10x+24[/tex]

are

[tex](x+4)(x+6)[/tex]

Hence Option C is correct

The correct answer is actually D. The person who had answered before me had accurate math, but they were confused. The answer  

(x + 6)(x + 4) is on D, not C.

Answer:

x = e^(-t) [1.2 sin(5t) + 6 cos(5t)]

Step-by-step explanation:

A damped oscillator has the equation of motion:

m d²x/dt² + β dx/dt + k x = 0

This is an example of a second order linear ordinary differential equation with constant coefficients.

d²x/dt² + b dx/dt + c x = 0

Notice the leading coefficient is 1.

x = C₁ e^(-½ t (b + √(b²−4c) )) + C₂ e^(-½ t (b − √(b²−4c) ))

x = (C₁ t + C₂) e^(-bt/2)

x = e^(-bt/2) [C₁ sin(½ t √(4c−b²)) + C₂ cos(½ t √(4c−b²))]

Given that m = 1, β = 2, and k = 26:

d²x/dt² + 2 dx/dt + 26 x = 0

Here, b = 2 and c = 26, so:

b²−4c = (2)²−4(26) = -100 < 0

The general solution is:

x = e^(-2t/2) [C₁ sin(½ t √100) + C₂ cos(½ t √100)]

x = e^(-t) [C₁ sin(5t) + C₂ cos(5t)]

To find the values of C₁ and C₂, first find dx/dt, then plug in the initial conditions.

dx/dt = e^(-t) [5C₁ cos(5t) − 5C₂ sin(5t)] − e^(-t) [C₁ sin(5t) + C₂ cos(5t)]

dx/dt = e^(-t) [5C₁ cos(5t) − 5C₂ sin(5t) − C₁ sin(5t) − C₂ cos(5t)]

dx/dt = e^(-t) [(5C₁ − C₂) cos(5t) − (5C₂ + C₁) sin(5t)]

Given x(0) = 6:

6 = e^(0) [C₁ sin(0) + C₂ cos(0)]

6 = C₂

Given x'(0) = 0:

0 = e^(0) [(5C₁ − C₂) cos(0) − (5C₂ + C₁) sin(0)]

0 = 5C₁ − C₂

0 = 5C₁ − 6

C₁ = 1.2

So the solution is:

x = e^(-t) [1.2 sin(5t) + 6 cos(5t)]

Here's the graph:

desmos.com/calculator/bavfsoju5c

a.

[tex]f(x,y)=e^{-(x-a)^2-(y-b)^2}\implies\begin{cases}f_x=-2(x-a)e^{-(x-a)^2-(y-b)^2}\\f_y=-2(y-b)e^{-(x-a)^2-(y-b)^2}\end{cases}[/tex]

Critical points occur where [tex]f_x=f_y=0[/tex]. The exponential factor is always positive, so we have

[tex]\begin{cases}-2(x-a)=0\\-2(y-b)=0\end{cases}\implies(x,y)=\boxed{(a,b)}[/tex]

b. As the previous answer established, the critical point occurs at (-3, 8) if [tex]\boxed{a=-3}[/tex] and [tex]\boxed{b=8}[/tex].

c. Check the determinant of the Hessian matrix of [tex]f(x,y)[/tex]:

[tex]\mathbf H(x,y)=\begin{bmatrix}f_{xx}&f_{xy}\\f_{yx}&f_{yy}\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

The second-order derivatives are

[tex]f_{xx}=(-2+4(x-a)^2)e^{-(x-a)^2-(y-b)^2}[/tex]

[tex]f_{xy}=4(x-a)(y-b)e^{-(x-a)^2-(y-b)^2}[/tex]

[tex]f_{yx}=4(x-a)(y-b)e^{-(x-a)^2-(y-b)^2}[/tex]

[tex]f_{yy}=(-2+4(y-b)^2)e^{-(x-a)^2-(y-b)^2}[/tex]

so that the determinant of the Hessian is

[tex]\det\mathbf H(x,y)=f_{xx}f_{yy}-{f_{xy}}^2=\left((4(x-a)^2-2)(4(y-b)^2-2)-16(x-a)^2(y-b)^2\right)e^{-2(x-a)^2-2(y-b)^2}[/tex]

[tex]\det\mathbf H(x,y)=(16(x-a)^2(y-b)^2-8(x-a)^2-8(y-b)^2)+4)e^{-2(x-a)^2-2(y-b)^2}[/tex]

The sign of the determinant is unchanged by the exponential term so we can ignore it. For [tex]a=x=-3[/tex] and [tex]b=y=8[/tex], the remaining factor in the determinant has a value of 4, which is positive. At this point we also have

[tex]f_{xx}(-3,8;a=-3,b=8)=-2[/tex]

which is negative, and this indicates that (-3, 8) is a local maximum.

The critical point of the given function is (a, b). For it to be at (-3, 8), a and b should be -3 and 8 respectively. This point (-3, 8) is a local maximum for the function.

The critical point of the given equation f(x, y) = e−(x − a)² − (y − b)² are the coordinates (a, b).

https://brainly.com/question/32077588

#SPJ3

Try this solution:

the rule: if f1>f2, then E1>E2, where f1;f2 - frequency, E1;E2 - energy of light.

The formula is L=c/f, where L - the wavelength, c - 3*10⁸ m/s, f - frequency.

Frequency for the wavelength 519 nm. is:

[tex]f=\frac{c}{L}=\frac{3*10^8}{519*10^{-9}}=\frac{3*10^17}{519}=578034682080924=5.78*10^{14}( \frac{1}{sec})[/tex]

Answer: the energy of light of wavelength 519 nm.