Answer: Robert is considered as his group's informal leader because of his "PERSONAL POWER".
Explanation: Personal power is the authority one has over his will and the ability to influence his followers.
Robert is considered an informal leader, that means the power of authority he has over his group is not formal and not recognised by the company, but the group has choosen him to lead them because of his problem-solving ability, these makes his authority over the group to be on a personal note, because it was not politically gained nor structurally gained.
Answer: C. personal power.
Options: A. position power.
B. political power.
C. personal power.
D. connection power.
Explanation: When a person in an organization is seen as a person of authority due to their personal knowledge or skills, the leadership role they hold is due to their personal power. This is what Robert has. Due to his problem solving skills and knowledge of his company's software, his colleagues will naturally seek him out when they have any problem with the software. This creates a sort of leadership role, even if it is an informal one.
It is different from position power, which is the power an individual has solely because of his job title.
1. ""Often he reached out for the best without knowing why he wanted it – and sometimes he ran up against the mysterious denials and prohibitions in which life indulges."" Why is this line significant? Is this about denial as the narrator suggests? What is denied?
Answer: He wants to have his children to have more money and be even more comfortable.
The denial is in his own mind and he feels like he was not given something he should have been.
Final answer:
The line emphasizes the human experience of striving for desires and facing inexplicable obstacles, which is a universal aspect of life. It signifies both the inner confusion about one's ambitions and the external denials faced due to societal structures or fate.
Explanation:
The line "Often he reached out for the best without knowing why he wanted it – and sometimes he ran up against the mysterious denials and prohibitions in which life indulges" is significant as it captures the essence of the human condition with respect to ambition and the impediments faced in the pursuit of dreams. The character's striving for 'the best' represents a universal human desire to attain greatness or fulfillment, but encountering 'mysterious denials and prohibitions' suggests the inexplicable barriers and setbacks one faces in life. These setbacks might not always be logical or just, but they are a part of the human experience, often leaving us with questions about our desires and the obstacles that prevent us from achieving them. The denial here is twofold: the denial of achieving one's desires without a clear rationale and the denial from societal structures or the 'mysterious' workings of fate that prevent him from attaining his goals.
Which of the following is NOT a symptom of groupthink? Illusions of invulnerability Pressure for conformity Careful evaluation of alternatives Self-censorship
Answer:
Careful evaluation of alternatives
Explanation:
Groupthink is a phenomenon when people get together to think with one mind setting aside their differences and individual goals just to achieve a group goal.
The symptom of groupthink that is NOT listed is: Careful evaluation of alternatives.
What is groupthinkGroupthink is when people in a group or team all want to agree and get along, so they stop thinking carefully and making good decisions. This often leads to making wrong or illogical decisions. Signs of groupthink can include:Illusions
Illusions of invulnerability happen when a group of people strongly believe they are always right and that nothing bad can happen to them. This makes them overly confident and they don't consider potential dangers or negative results.
Read more about groupthink here:
https://brainly.com/question/10206116
#SPJ6
Which of the following statements is TRUE with regard to communication? Perfect communication is not dependent on a channel and its richness. Communication cannot be used to motivate and control employees in an organization. Perfect communication results in dissimilar mental models. Communication involves the mere imparting of meaning to another person or group. Communication involves the transfer and understanding of meaning.
Answer:
Communication involves the transfer and understanding of meaning.Explanation:
Communication is the process of transferring information from one person to another person. It involves a sender and a receiver. In other words, it requires two or more parties to achieve proper interaction.
Communication involves the transfer and understanding of meaning. The person who conveys or transfers information should be able to convey clear and concise information so the the other party would understand the meaning and the purpose of the interaction.
Thus, effective communication involves three important elements: the sender, the receiver and the message.
The true statement as regards to communication is that communication involves the transfer and understanding of meaning.
The last option is the correct one here. Communication can be described as the ability to convey ones thought to someone else through different channels.
For there to be proper communication, the person that is to receive the message must be able to decipher its meaning and act accordingly.
Read more on communication
https://brainly.com/question/18100115?referrer=searchResults
Scenario: You are a Geographic Information System (GIS) specialist who normally works at the Public Works Planning office. You are directed to report to the Incident Command Post (ICP) and have been assigned to the Planning Section Chief and will report to the Chief. You will be producing maps to display potential flooding impacts in the city and county. What NIMS Management Characteristics are you supporting
The correct answer is Chain of Command and Unity of Command ; Information and Intelligence Management
Chain of Command dives into the hierarchical structure of the organization and Unity of Commands refers to the fact that every individual has a designated supervisor that they report to. This is supported by the information given because you report to the Planning Section Chief.
On the other hand, because you are producing maps you support the Information and Intelligence Management which deals with "gathering, analyzing, assessing, sharing, and managing incident-related information and intelligence
The NIMS characteristic supported by the GIS specialist has been Chain of Command with Information and Intelligence Management.
For the analysis of the geographical situation in an area, there has been potential study for the floods and other disaster.
The geographical study has been performed and maintained in a hierarchical order, to mediate the flow of information to the supervisors and to the Planning Chief for the timely and appropriate measures.
The information has been supported with maps and analysis data that help in the intelligence management as well. The management study has been dealing with the collection of information along with assessing and analyzing for the incident management.
Thus, the NIMS characteristic supported by the Geographic Information System (GIS) specialist has been Chain of Command with Information and Intelligence Management.
For more information about GIS, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/17431971
Jason, a human service professional, can often be found criticizing his clients. What kind of response is this considered?
Answer:
The correct answer is 3) A toxic behavior, which should never be used.
Explanation:
Human services professionals have the important task of helping other people, so they must have different attributes to perform in the best way, among those attributes is respect, empathy, efficiency, trustworthiness, honesty among others.
For example, in the case of Jason, he presents a toxic behavior that is not allowed to be used in his work, since human service professionals must take into account that they cannot judge their clients and that there should be a separation that he is only there to help your customers.
I hope this information can help you.
Jason's criticizing of his clients is considered unprofessional and unethical in the human service field. It undermines the principles of professional ethics and personal respect. Constructive communication is instead recommended.
Explanation:Jason's response can be considered unprofessional and unethical. In the field of human services, professionals are expected to maintain a respectful and supportive attitude towards their clients, regardless of any personal feelings or judgments. Criticizing clients discourages a safe and trusting environment necessary for effective aid and service. This action violates basic principles of professional ethics and personal respect inherent in human service work. By focusing on constructive communication, Jason can better assist his clients, encouraging their growth and development rather than diminishing their self-worth with criticism.
Learn more about Professional Ethics here:https://brainly.com/question/33533508
#SPJ3
22. Two closed, pyramid-shaped beakers containing clearly identical amounts of a liquid are judged by a child to hold different amounts after one of the beakers is inverted. The child apparently lacks a sense of what child development milestone?
Answer:
b. Concept of conservation
Explanation:
The concept of conservation is related to logical ability. This is the ability to understand the logical thinking that a certain quantity is the same despite the size has been changed. It helps a person to understand the shape and size, and apparent size.
The concept of conservation was given by Jean Piaget. The conservation is not found in the pre-operational stage of development in children. Conservation is a property of children in which children developed logical thinking about the invariant size, shape of an object despite it is not resent in front of a child.
Thus in the above statement, the child lacks the sense of what child development milestone.
You have learned that earnings functions are one of the most investigated relationships in economics. These typically relate the logarithm of earnings to a series of explanatory variables such as education, work experience, gender, race, etc. Why do you think that researchers have preferred a log-linear specification over a linear specification?
Researchers prefer the log-linear specification because economic gains are not naturally distributed.
We can arrive at this answer because:
Within the economy, earnings are a dependent variable in relation to factors such as education, professional experiences, race, and other elements that can be considered independent variables.The distribution of earnings within an economic system is not done naturally.This promotes an increase in the error variation, which can harm an analysis with a linear method.In this case, the use of log-linear specification can cause a more stabilized distribution that is closer to reality, promoting more precise and correct results.
More information:
https://brainly.com/question/967776?referrer=searchResults
Describe in detail the differences between the way experts and nonexperts go about solving problems. In your answer, highlight the advantages and disadvantages to being an expert in a field.
Answer:
Explanation:
To share a brief understanding of experts, who is an expert, an expert is considered, someone who has enough experience to carry put a particular task, he or she understands the possible scenarios and problems that might likely affect a system. While a non expert is someone, not that he doesn't understand the system, he might but not in details ,not enough experience unlike am expert.
So from the above analogy between experts and non experts ,it can be deduced that the method and approach to work from an expert will be more detailed because the possible scenarios of the task, he very much understands it buh a non expert, thou he might understand the task , but the approach to the system might be difference. An expert will potentially go straight to the point of the task, and even before starting the task already has a full knowledge of the problem compared to am non expert that might nor have a general knowledge of the task buh approaching the task with just confidence of previous works related to such task. I believe from the few points I have been able to point out the differences between an expert and non expert.
Being an expert in a field is a good thing in order to solve problem.
The differences between the way experts and nonexperts go about solving problems is that expert have knowledge of ways and methods solving problem while on the other hand, nonexpert have no knowledge about solving problem.
Advantages of being an expert in a field is that expert know how to use different tools and methods for solving problem while on the other hand, disadvantages of being an expert in a field is that expert is not able to learn or accept new problems or situations so we can conclude that being an expert in a field is a good thing in order to solve problem.
Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/15016613
Don is Equipment Repair Company’s chief executive officer. On Equipment Repair’s behalf, Don solicits business, hires and fires workers, and handles finances. With respect to Equipment Repair, Don is most likely
Answer: An employee.
Explanation: An employee is an individual who was hired by an employer to do a specific job. Employee is hired for a specific job or to provide labor and who works in the service of someone else (the employer).
Christen who just turned eighteen is out with several friends. They decide to see a movie, but it is sold out. Christen hid in the back of the theatre and yelled "Fire" as loudly as she could. Everyone ran out of the theatre, and a number got in their vehicles and left. Christen and her friends thought that seeing the movie was now possible. Unfortunately, a theatre employee saw Christen yelling, called the police, and she was arrested. Christen told the police officers that she was only exercising her free speech rights. She also told the police that the theatre employee lied and that she personally saw him stealing popcorn. The theatre employee told Christen that he was going to sue for defamation, and she told him that she would win based on her right to free speech. Discuss whether Christen is right on one or both counts and why.
Answer:
Christen is wrong in both counts.
Explanation:
Freedom of speech or freedom of expression is the individual or collective right to enunciate, utter and develop individual or community ideas, opinions and arguments. It is expected that anyone can express their ideas free from retaliation, censorship, or legal action. It is recognised as a Universal Human Right, and most countries in the world include it as part of its constitution.
However, freedom of speech has some limitations, which are imposed aiming to restrain people to harm other individuals or communities. For instance, when someone intentionally lies to commit fraud. These limitations vary from country to country, for instance, Germany forbids speech that denies the Holocaust, but Spain does not. Yet, there are some common limitations to free speech across most UN Member States. These are related to incitement to terrorism or riot, fraud, unauthorised usage of copyrighted material, invitation or incitation to commit a crime, defamation and in many cases obscenity.
Christen yelled "Fire" in an attempt to prompt the theatre audience to vacate. This was a lie, since there was not a fire in the facilities. This can be taken as a fraud, since she tricked the patrons to abandon the premises.
When she was caught, she intended to defame the theatre employee.
In both occasions, she was not protected by freedom of speech principle.
Final answer:
Christen's claim of exercising her free speech rights is incorrect because falsely shouting 'Fire' in a crowded space is not protected under the First Amendment due to the clear and present danger it poses.
Explanation:
Christen is not correct in asserting that her actions are protected under free speech rights for two reasons.
First, the act of falsely yelling "Fire" in a crowded theatre does not constitute protected speech because it presents a clear and present danger to public order, potentially leading to panic and harm, as established by the Supreme Court's longstanding precedent.
Secondly, Christen's accusation against the theatre employee could constitute defamation if it is proven to be false and made with malice.
According to legal precedents, such as Schenck v. United States (1919), shouting that there is a fire when there is none is a classic example where free speech is limited due to the potential immediate threat to safety.
As for defamation, Christen's false accusation about the employee stealing popcorn, if proven untrue and damaging to the employee's reputation, could lead to a successful defamation suit, as indicated by the legal standards for libel and slander.
Mischa has just met a man she finds attractive at a party. She would really like for him to feel as attracted to her as she feels to him. Based on research on embodied cognition, what should Mischa do to promote his attraction to her?
The correct answer is Try to hand him a large object that will make his arms open towards her in the same motion as a bear hug
From the place of the cognitive perspective, the understanding of mathematical ideas is not apprehended only through the concepts of pure mathematics, it would be easier to look in the precursor authors for what motivated them to think and develop their theories, what they should have in mind, when they discovered / created their theories / mathematical bases and, how they understood that mathematical knowledge for them. It is important to note that such aspects are never taken into account when teaching / learning some mathematical theory.
The CASEL Model Site evaluation of SEL programs examined their level of quality over five years. Programs that did continue to provide high-quality services had three characteristics. Which characteristic below is one of those three?
a. training and skill development among teachers
b. support from school administration and parents
c. extensive funding for the program
d. both ‘a’ and ‘b’
The correct answer is letter A
Explanation: CASEL programs examined high-quality, school-based prevention programs that sustain the level of quality for five years now.
CASEL model is a type of educational model, where teachers are trained so that they are very competent in what they do and thus become good teachers with a preparation focused on a phenomenal type of education.
A guy has two girlfriends: in the East and the West. He works near 5 Points Marta station and finishes his job at a random time of the day. Rather than deciding to which of two girls take the train - he leaves the choice to a chance: he takes the train (East or West) whichever comes first. The west train comes every 10 min and the East train comes every 10 min throughout the day. Nevertheless, after half a year he finds out that he is coming to east girl several time more frequently than to the West girl.Why?
The guy visits the east more frequently because, due to factors like the timing patterns of the trains and his work schedule, the east-bound train often arrived next more frequently during the instances when he made it to the station.
Explanation:The situation described in the question pertains to the concept of probability and frequency in mathematics. Even though both east and west trains have the same frequency (i.e., both arrive every 10 minutes), the guy ends up visiting the east more. This can be explained using a principle called conditional probability.
Assuming the guy arrives at the station at a random time and he takes the first train that arrives, irrespective of its direction. So the chance that he takes a specific train depends not only on the frequency of that train but also on when he gets to the station. The chances are equal if he gets to the station exactly when both trains are there, else the odds favor the train that is due to arrive next.
Therefore, it could be that the east train was simply due to arrive next more frequently during the instances when the guy made it to the station. This could occur due to numerous factors, such as timing patterns of the trains and the guy's work schedule etc. If these factors somehow align in such a way that the east train tends to arrive next after the guy's work ends, then he would end up on the east train (and thus, end up visiting the east ) more frequently.
Learn more about Probability and Frequency here:https://brainly.com/question/1452877
#SPJ12
Compare and contrast communism and fascism. Select one example for each to examine the origins of the governments, their accomplishments, and their failures. What accounts for the fact that the masses mobilized to support these movements? Elaborate.
Answer:
communism is a system based around a theory of economic equality and advocates for a classless society, WHILE, fascism is a nationalistic, top-down system with rigid class roles that is ruled by an all-powerful dictator. Both communism and fascism originated in Europe and gained popularity in the early to mid 20th century.
Fascist governments are different from communist ones in that fascists, in theory, support the right of labor representatives and corporate representatives (CEOs, company presidents, etc.) to negotiate - through a system called corporatism.
Explanation: The most disturbing development of the interwar era was the emergence of totalitarian communist and fascist governments.1 Italian dictator Benito Mussolini coined the word “totalitarian” to express the state’s role of personifying the “immanent spirit of the nation,” but the word has come to mean the state’s total control of politics, economics, and society. In this sense, totalitarianism has been more nearly a “communist” than a “fascist” phenomenon.
McGaa identifies four ethical commandments within Native American moral thinking that are summarized in the concept of ____________, which implies that all living things are interrelated in an extended family. The four commandments are respect for the earth, respect for the Great Spirit, respect for fellow humans, and respect for individual freedom.
McGaa identifies four ethical commandments within Native American moral thinking that are summarized in the concept of coexistence.
Explanation:
The societies of the native Americans were increasingly naturalistic and wee about living in harmony with and respect the elements of the nature around them.
This was surmised in their core four values which are respect for the Great Spirit, respect for fellow humans, and respect for individual freedom.
These values are at large the symbol of coexistence among the people who believe they must live in harmony with their surroundings and fellow human.
Suppose that a study of children who were 9 to 14-years-old found that the larger a shoe size that a child has, the higher the score they got on a mathematical skills test. One interpretation might be that increased shoe size causes improved quantification skills. What might be a confounding variable in this relationship? Please give your answer and explain in no more than three sentences.
Answer:Some individuals may be natural good at maths or may be just smart kids who are good with mathematics
Explanation:Some students may be intelligent or good at maths which means the shoe size will not be the cause of their quantification skills.
A confounding variable refers to another variable that you may have not take notice of but which is very likely to act on the variable you are trying to measure and make that change you are looking for , its an extra variable. It can mess up your experiment and give you result that are not caused by what your projected. They can assume a correlation that doesn't exist and insert bias in your study. For this reason you have to know these variable before you start your research or study in order to avoid them.
The correct answer is the skills of the children in math.
In statistics, a confounding variable also known as a confounding factor, a confusing variable or confounding factor is a strange variable that is positively or negatively associated with both the explanatory variable and the response variable. We need to control these factors to avoid incorrect beliefs that the response variable is associated with the explanatory variable.
Confusion is a major threat to the validity of inferences made about statistical associations. In the case of a confounding variable, the association observed with the response variable should be attributed to the confounding factor, instead of the explanatory variable. In science, we test for confounding factors including these third, or fourth, or fifth, or sixth variables, in statistical models to explain the association of interest.
The ethical framework that assumes that people are deeply connected to one another in webs of relationships, and that ethical decisions cannot be made outside the context of those relationships is known as: A. Free Market Ethics B. Ethic of Care C. Deontology D. Virtue Ethics
Answer:
B. Ethic of Care
Explanation:
The Ethics of Care is based on moral feelings and the human ability to care for other people. According to this idea, social relations and the morals related to them are based on day by day behaviors, and cannot be understood without the social context which it's inserted. In other words, the Ethics of Care attempts to create a society based on the otherness, where each individual should look at the other as important. Most important is that, according to this theory, all the consequences of moral conduct would affect everyone.
As part of a plan to emphasize a dynamic corporate culture at the Gagnier and Morris advertising company, Yvette has done away with traditional cubicles and replaced them with open-area, nonterritorial workspaces, or "hot desks." Nonterritorial offices Heightened global competition Emphasis on Ethics
Answer:
Nonterritorial offices
Explanation:
Nonterritorial offices are the system of offices in which all employees can sit wherever they want, allowing them to chose their space according to their current needs and the day's task.
They can find a more quiet place if the work demands it or can choose the place with more people on the "hot desk" or open area, in case they want to communicate, share ideas and cooperate on some work. This is fitting for an advertising company where this kind of communication and cooperation is encouraged.
Answer: Non Territorial offices
Explanation: your welcome, please mark me brainliest
Many discussions of crime suggest that smart defendants are able to beat charges by pleading insanity, slanting their testimony at the urging of defense counsel, and exploiting legal loopholes such as the exclusionary rule. Given the profile of the typical criminal defendant, how realistic are these assumptions?
While perceptions suggest that smart defendants can easily evade charges through the insanity defense and legal strategies, these are not realistic portrayals of the average criminal defendant's situation. The insanity defense is infrequently used and seldom successful, and most defendants resort to plea bargaining due to limited resources and the potential for heavier sentences at trial.
Discussions about smart defendants beating charges often revolve around the insanity defense and perceived legal loopholes, but the reality within the criminal justice system is quite different. First, the insanity defense is narrowly defined and hard to prove, with the onus on the defendant to rebut the presumption of sanity, and it is rarely successful. In addition, the profile of a typical criminal defendant does not match the well-resourced individual capable of manipulating the system; many struggle with mental illness, adequate representation, and the financial means to mount such defenses.
Plea bargaining is a much more common occurrence in the criminal justice system due to the enormous incentives it provides for both the prosecution and the defense. Wealth plays a considerable role, where affluent defendants may have the means to afford high-powered attorneys and mount substantial defenses, potentially including the insanity defense. However, this is not the typical scenario, as the vast majority of criminal defendants do not have such resources and, instead, often rely on plea bargains to avoid harsher sentences associated with trials.
Another critical aspect is the consequences of going to trial. Defendants who exercise their right to a trial face harsher sentences compared to those who accept plea deals. Less than 3 percent of felony cases actually go to trial, which means the majority of defendants accept plea bargains, often due to coercion or the inability to mount an effective defense. This system disproportionately affects those without the means to challenge or navigate the system effectively.
The three-year-old class at Ms. Cherry's Preschool is getting ready to take a field trip to the local supermarket. While the two teachers prepare the van, what is the best strategy for the student teacher to take while supervising the children?
a. Stand the children in line, going over the safety rules and regulations for field trips.
b. Have the children sit in circle time and report what they did over the weekend.
c. Put on a puppet show for the children.
d. Allow the children to play in the classroom, while keeping a watchful eye, ready to intervene as necessary.
Answer: Stand the children in line, going over the safety rules and regulations for field trips.
Amongst all the options listed above, the best option is for the student teacher to "Stand the children in line, going over the safety rules and regulations for field trips". This is because that is the only option that involves prepping the children for the field trip. Standing them in line, makes them ready for the trip, going over the safety rules and regulations makes them alert and active for what they are to expect. Every other option will take their mind away form the trip which is not a good method for prepping.
"If you were to design a political system for a representative democracy that would produce a multi-party system with coalition governments, what form of electoral process would you choose?"
Answer:
Proportional representation
Explanation:
If I wanted to design a political system for a representative democracy that would result in a multi-party system with coalition governments, I would personally go for a system of proportional representation. Proportional representation is a system in which divisions in the electorate are accurately reflected proportionately in the elected body. Because of this, smaller parties are more likely to be able to place elected officials in power. Moreover, this system tends to have a great plurality of ideologies represented in government.
Suppose that you are in the top floor of a library, and you suddenly think about some information you need on the main floor. You return to the main floor and find that you can't recall what you needed. After returning to the top floor, you recall instantly.
Answer: you forget what you had in your mind
Explanation:
you cant remember what you were thinking.
Answer: This is an example of The encoding specificity principle.
Explanation: This principle was introduced by Thompson and Tulving who suggested that contextual information is encoded with memories which effects the retrieval of said memories. This principles illustrates that matching the encoding contexts of information at recall assists in the retrieval of episodic memories.
The full participant may be a genuine participant in what he or she is studying or at least pretend to be a genuine participant. In any event, if a researcher is acting as a full participant, he/she lets people see him/her only as a___________________________, not as a researcher.
Answer: Participant
Explanation:
Full participant or complete participant is the person who is completely attached researcher of the experiment or study.This researcher is immersed in experiment completely such that participants aren't aware that research is being conducted on them while interacting and observing with researcher .
According to the question,if any researcher is acting as complete participants then other participants involved in the study do not have hint about researcher. They don't behave as researcher during study with participants and thus, others see researcher as participant.
The correct answer is participant
Explanation: In this case the full participant cannot let people discover that it is the full participant and this makes them act as if they were a normal research participant, which is a difficult job because you must be very careful so that the other participants do not realize that one who looks like a normal participant is actually not.
Bob took the painting back to Jane and asked for a refund. Jane refused on the basis that she never gave refunds and that Bob took the risk that the painting was not done by Bill. Should Bob sue in small claims court, who will likely win and why?
Full Question:
Jane operates a home decorations shop selling slightly used goods. She bought a painting from Sally for the shop. Bob came into the shop and asked if the painting was by Bill, a local artist of some repute. Jane, without checking with Sally, says, "I'm sure it is" because she really did think it looked like one of Bill's paintings. Bob bought the painting. A week or so later, he took the painting by Bill's studio. Bill just laughed and said that he never painted anything that horrible. Bob took the painting back to Jane and asked for a refund. Jane refused on the basis that she never gave refunds and that Bob took the risk that the painting was not done by Bill. Should Bob sue in small claims court, who will likely win and why?
a. Bob, on the basis of negligent misrepresentation
b. Bob, on the basis of innocent misrepresentation.
c. Bob, on the basis of a unilateral mistake.
d. Jane, on the basis that Bob accepted the risk of loss.
e. Jane, both on the basis that Bob accepted the risk of loss and that he agreed by an oral contract to purchase the painting.
Answer:
a. Bob, on the basis of negligent misrepresentation
Explanation:
Negligent misrepresentation
occurs when someone makes a statement without making sure this statement is based on true facts. Negligent misrepresentation happens when a person may not lie directly (saying something knowing it to be untrue), but makes a statement about something with no factual backing. Bob will likely win here because Jane "assumed" the painting was from Bill without confirming it was.
Four-year-old Hedley is unhappy that he was only given one cookie. "Not enough!" he says. His father takes the cookie and breaks it into three pieces, which he lines up side by side. "That's better," says Hedley. This example shows that Hedley is paying attention to states rather than _____________.
Answer: Transformations
Explanation:
Hedley is still within the early childhood and is still undergoing physical and cognitive development that is why he finds it difficult to accept the cookie as one but he was satisfied and happy when he finds out that it is now in three pieces.
TO HEDLEY, THE COOKIE BEING BROKEN INTO MORE THAN ONE SAMPLE IS BETTER AND BIGGER IN SIZE THAN THE COOKIE WHEN TRANSFORMED INTO A SINGLE PIECE OF COOKIE.
Norepinephrine acts on the heart by ________. A) decreasing heart contractility B) causing a decrease in stroke volume C) blocking the action of calcium D) causing threshold to be reached more quickly
Answer: option d
Explanation:they are also normally called noradrenaline.
They do help by constant regulating of the blood pressure and to increase the sugar (glucose) level content in the blood. It help majorly to lift up (increase) the rate as well as the force of the contraction of the heart and also in do lead to an increase in muscle contraction due to the fact that they are push out(realeased) from the sympathetic nerve fibre ends.
Norepinephrine acts on the heart by causing the threshold to be reached more quickly. Thus, option D is correct.
Vasoconstriction, which is a narrowing of the blood vessels, is encouraged by norepinephrine. Consequently, blood pressure rises as a result. Norepinephrine activates alpha-adrenoreceptors in the blood vessel cells, much like epinephrine does. Blood sugar levels and heart rate both rise as a result.
Chemical messengers epinephrine and norepinephrine are both. Both neurotransmitters and hormones are produced by them. Epinephrine, norepinephrine, and other hormones produced by the endocrine and reproductive systems circulate in the circulation as hormones. They instruct tissues and organs to function in various ways.
The role of neurotransmitters is comparable. They only exist in neuron cells, though, and move across synapses, which are the points where two nerve fibers converge. Neurotransmitters are created by nerve cells in response to electrical impulses.
Therefore, option D is the ideal selection.
Learn more about norepinephrine here:
https://brainly.com/question/32498776
#SPJ6
how is a civic virtue different from other kinds of virtue?
A. the behavior is different
B. people with civic virtue are morally superior
C. the goal is to promote democracy
D. the aim is to promote moral goodness
Answer:
C. the goal is to promote democracy
Explanation:
Civic virtue is different from other kinds of virtue because the goal is to promote democracy, it has to do with the willingness to do ones part in supporting the effort of the government and public good and it is important for the success/effective functioning of a government and society.
Working with people from other cultures will require tolerance. One of the best ways to become more tolerant is by Group of answer choices practicing empathy. increasing your individualism. encouraging ethnocentrism. knowing your communication style.
Answer: Practice of empathy
Explanation:
Empathy is ability due to which a person tends to share their ideas and thought with other people so that they can understand it.It helps people to understand about others emotion, mind state ,issues, etc.
According to the question, practicing empathy will make a person more tolerant between working with other culture people as they will tend to understand others feeling and views more.Thus, the person can control himself/herself by perceiving emotions of others.
Other options are incorrect because individualism increment, acknowledging own communication pattern and increasing ethnocentrism are not the impact that makes a person tolerant while working with other different cultured people.Thus, the correct option is empathy practice.
Charice's boyfriend is late for their date. She believes this is because he is thoughtless and self-centered. Cherokee has made a(n) _______ attribution.
Answer:
personal/internal attribution
Explanation:
"Attribution" refers to the process in which a person tries to explain what led to the events or behaviors that occur. There are mainly two types of attributions: internal attribution and external attribution.
Internal Attribution - is also known as "Personal Attribution." This refers to explaining a person's behavior according to his personal characteristics.
External Attribution - is also known as "Situational Attribution." This refers to explaining a person's behavior according to external factors like stress, abuse and the like.
The situation above is an example of "personal attribution." Charice thinks that her boyfriend is late because he is thoughtless and self-centered. She is finding a reason for his being late by looking at him internally.
So, this explains the answer.
In the ethical yardstick of ________, decisions are made solely on the basis of their outcomes, ideally to provide the greatest good for the greatest number.
Answer:
utilitarianism
Explanation:
By using utilitarianism approach, person differentiate between right and wrong decision on basis of their consequences. In utilitarianism approach person consider right as right when its outcomes not only maximize his happiness and well-being but also make other people not affected.