Answer:
I pretty sure the answer is c
Answer:
C
Explanation:
just took quiz on a p e x
Why was the Battle of Gettysburg unusual compared to other battles in the east? Check all of the boxes that apply.
The Confederacy won.
Lee suffered a major defeat.
Lee was defending Confederate territory
Lee was invading the Union
Answer:
B and D
Explanation:
Answer:
ab
Explanation:
What was the impact of Grantism on American politics?
A. Voting rights were permanently defended.
B. Republicans lost some of the public's trust.
C. The Republican party strengthened its control of the South.
O D. African Americans began to vote more for Democratic candidates.
E PREVIOUS
Answer:
the answer is Republican lost some of the public’s trust
b
Explanation:
Answer:
B. Republicans lost some of the public's trust.
Explanation:
Just did test. Have a great day!
Why do you think farmers were the first to protest the unfair shipping practices of the railroads in the late 19th century?
Answer:
Farmers were facing many problems in the late 1800s. These problems included overproduction, low crop prices, high interest rates, high transportation costs, and growing debt
Explanation:
Answer:
BECAUSE THEY MAKE .FRUITS AND VEGETABLES FOR THE ENVIORMENT
Explanation:
One of the most important principles of the Texas Constitution is _________.
a.
limited government
b.
unique powers
c.
property rights
d.
advanced education
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
D
Answer:
Texas actually goes by a principle of limited government or it basically has a limited government
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Why was there a split in the Muslim world after Muhammad’s death?
Answer:
trav
Explanation:
kylie 50
Answer:
They chose sides following the death of the Islamic prophet Muhammad in AD 632. A dispute over succession to Islamic prophet Muhammad as a caliph of the Islamic community spread across various parts of the world, which led to the Battle of Jamal and Battle of Siffin.
Hope this helps.
Which of the following IS NOT a reason why the United States helped in the
rebuilding of Japan after World War II?
A.because the U.S. wanted Japan to be an ally and trading partner
B.because the U.S. wanted to make Japan the 51st state
C.because the Americans felt guilty about what the atomic bombs did to the people
D.because of the fear that Communism would take over Asia
Answer: B
Explanation:
because that should be the answer .
What was true about the American economy during the Revolutionary War?
A. Congress could not approve a national currency.
B. Congress did not want to tax people.
C. Loyalists controlled trade.
D. Prices for goods were low.
The truth about the American economy during the Revolutionary War is Congress did not want to tax people. Option B
What is Revolutionary War?Generally, The American Revolutionary War, commonly known as the Revolutionary War or the American War of Freedom, was fought between the colonies of the United States and Great Britain to win independence for the American people.
The first battle was fought on April 19, 1775, and was followed by the adoption of the Lee Resolution on July 2, 1776, as well as the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776.
Colonial resistance to British efforts to impose more authority over the colonies and to force them to reimburse the crown for its protection of the colonies during the French and Indian War was the primary motivating factor behind the outbreak of the American Revolution (1754–63).
In conclusion, The fact that Congress did not want to tax people is the key to understanding the state of the American economy during the Revolutionary War. Alternative B
Read more about Revolutionary War
https://brainly.com/question/1466912
#SPJ1
What facts do you learn about CJNG from this article?
Answer:i need help!!!!
Explanation:
What was the American System?
The American System, conceived by Henry Clay, was a strategic economic policy involving a national bank, protective tariffs, and internal improvements such as roads and canals to strengthen the American economy.
The American System was an economic plan that played a significant role in American policy during the first half of the 19th century. Conceptualized by Henry Clay, it aimed to strengthen and unify the nation with a focus on three fundamental pillars: a national bank, a protective tariff, and investments in internal improvements.
The bank was intended to foster a stable currency and credit supply. The tariff sought to protect emerging American industries from foreign competition while also raising government revenue.
The internal improvements, such as roads and canals, were designed to facilitate the movement of goods throughout the country, hence improving the efficiency of domestic trade and commerce.
In 1816, under the presidency of James Madison and spearheaded by influential lawmakers such as Henry Clay and John C. Calhoun, Congress set about implementing this system to support national growth.
The American System reflected aspects of Alexander Hamilton's earlier economic proposals and was advanced further during the presidency of John Quincy Adams.
The system was a response to the country's need for economic independence and infrastructural development, reducing reliance on foreign trade and uniting the diverse American economies of the North and South.
What did President Kennedy mean when he called the National Academy of Sciences the "seedbed of our nation's future"?
President Kennedy viewed the National Academy of Sciences as fundamental to the nation's progress, seeing it as a source of intellectual growth and technological advancement that would lead to a more educated and peaceful society. By calling it a 'seedbed,' he emphasized its vital role in nurturing the country's future, in line with his administration's focus on public service and the recruitment of exceptional talent.
When President Kennedy referred to the National Academy of Sciences as the "seedbed of our nation's future," he meant that it played a pivotal role in fostering the growth and development of the country's scientific and technological advancement. The Academy, as an authoritative body on science and technology, is instrumental in providing guidance and advice to the nation, helping to inform policy and drive innovation. Kennedy's vision, as indicated in his inaugural address, emphasized the importance of education and intellectual contribution for both individual and national fulfillment, as well as global peace, highlighting the Academy's role in cultivating these values.
In his administration, Kennedy called for a spirit of public service and recruited "the best and the brightest" to take part in this endeavor. His comparison of the National Academy of Sciences to a seedbed suggests he saw it as a source from which the country could grow intellectual and educational resources, subsequently leading to societal and global improvements. By investing in and valuing organizations like the National Academy of Sciences, Kennedy demonstrated his commitment to using education, science, and technology as key tools to build a future that places reason over force.
The map shows where each modern Romance language is widely spoken. A map titled Romance Languages. A key shows languages by color. Spanish is green, Portuguese is purple, French is light orange, Italian is yellow, Romanian is dark orange. Spain and parts of Central and South America are green. Portugal, parts of South America and Africa are purple. Italy is yellow. Canada, France, and parts of Africa or light orange. A country in Europe is dark orange. Based on the map, which conclusion can be drawn regarding Romance languages? They have yet to reach the continent of Africa. They are most heavily concentrated in Europe. They are spoken in various places in the world. They are the only languages spoken in North America
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Answer:
c
Explanation:
2) In ancient Mesopotamia, slaves were usually used for household chores or A) to fight in wars. Eliminate B) to construct buildings. C) to serve as sacrifices. D) to colonize other lands.
Answer:
b beacuse they used to make them construct temples and palaces
Answer: B
Explanation: To construct buildings
Describe the political history of Turkey during the 20th century.
Answer:
Although the Turks favored neutrality in the conflict germinating between the Central Powers of Germany and Austria and the allied countries of England, France, and Russia, Enver Pasa, who declared himself war minister in 1914, favored cooperation with the Germans.
In the summer of 1914, Enver Pasa signed a secret peace treaty with the Germans promising naval assistance in the face of Russian aggression in the Black Sea. Two months later, the Ottoman Empire was dragged into a war. With the Arab revolts in the east and the Russians on the northern border, the Turks were surrounded by hostile forces. Atatürk's legendary defense of Gallipoli in 1915 succeeded in saving the Straits, and therefore Istanbul, from invasion. But Turkish forces were no match for Allied tanks, automatic weapons, and airplanes. On October 30, 1918, the Turks, represented by the CUP government, agreed to an armistice with England and France.
The Treaty of Sèvres was signed on August 20, 1920 by the government of Mehmet VI. Under the treaty, the Ottomans relinquished all European territories except for a small area around Istanbul. Armenia and Kurdistan gained autonomy, Greece was assigned the administration of the region around Izmir, and French and Italian troops were left to occupy portions of the rest of Anatolia. Control of Turkish finances was taken over by the Allies. But the treaty was to be short-lived.
Turkish Statehood
Spurred on by defeat and foreign occupation, nationalists established pockets of resistance called "Defense of Rights" groups. Atatürk -- who was already an active nationalist, having taken part in the CUP overthrow of 1909 -- began organizing various nationalist factions, with the twin goals of recognition of a national movement and the liberation of Anatolia from foreign occupation.
Explanation:
(happy to help)
Turkey's 20th century political history involves the transition from the Ottoman Empire to a modern secular nation-state, the founding of a republic by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, and challenges such as establishing secular democracy and regional disputes over resources.
Explanation:The 20th Century Political History of Turkey
The political history of Turkey during the 20th century is marked by significant transformation and turmoil. The fall of the Ottoman Empire, which was once a substantial power controlling parts of Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East, set the stage for modern Turkey's founding. In the early 20th century, the empire, labelled the "sick man of Europe", saw a rise in Turkish nationalism, particularly with the Young Turks movement that sought to reform and preserve the empire.
The onset of World War I saw the Ottoman Empire side with Germany, hoping for gains but ultimately contributing to its downfall. The empire's end came with the Treaty of Sèvres in 1920, but nationalist forces led by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk opposed the treaty's harsh terms. The successful military campaigns led to the formation of a new, secular republic, which was formalized in the Treaty of Lausanne in 1923, that set the borders of the modern state of Turkey.
Under Atatürk's leadership, Turkey underwent significant Westernization and secularization. The adoption of a new constitution and regular elections signaled a move towards democracy. Reforms included the giving of voting rights to women, the change from Arabic to Latin alphabet, and the modernization of legal systems inspired by European civil codes, abandoning Islamic law. Yet, the early republic remained under single-party rule until multi-party democracy took hold after World War II.
Turkey's internal politics in the latter half of the century were often turbulent, including military coups and conflicts over the role of Islam in government. The country also faced challenges with its ethnic minorities and issues such as the Armenian Genocide remain sensitive topics. In its foreign policy, especially concerning water rights over the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers, Turkey has been involved in regional disputes with neighbors like Syria and Iraq.
Overall, the 20th century saw Turkey transition from an empire to a modern nation-state, pursuing secular democracy amidst various internal and external challenges.
How does the Afghanistan war relate to entangling alliances?
Answer:
Militarism: The Arms Races, with war looming nations were desperate not to be outdone in any area of their military. Germany, France and Russia started to conscript large portions of their male population, this gave their countrymen military experience and a taste of war, suddenly everyone was ready and willing to fight. This conscription and arms build up meant that soon every European state had a huge army at its disposal, these armies were ruining their economies, they had to lose them soon but couldnt just let them go, they were propelled to war in order to destroy their enemies and give them the security they needed to allow disarmament. Germany also began building a large, modernised navy that directly threatened the British, who they were still attempting to secure as an ally at the time, and eventually forced them into the arms of the French, which leads us onto......
Alliances: without alliances WW1 would merely have been a short war between Serbia and Austria-Hungary, the alliance system dragged all of Europe into that insignificant conflict, first Germany and Russia and then the British and French a few days later. It was what made a small war a major world conflict.
Imperialism: Again Germany's search for both a colonial and Central European empire put a lot of pressure on the Triple Entente and made a war more likely. They constantly threatened Britiain in order to secure concessions of territory (particularly in Africa and the Pacific), again this only tightened Britain's links with France and added to the Alliance web.
Nationalism: This was what started the war and what allowed it to continue for so long. Previously wars had been very short and there had generally been at least a modicum of healthy respect for the enemy in many previous European conflicts. By WW1 the populations of Europe had been assured by their governments propoganda that their enemies were the lowest of the low. It was the hatred of the Germans that made the French want revenge for their occupation of Alsace Lorraine, it was the hatred of the Germans that allowed the British Army to have a sudden surge in recruit numbers in 1914 when it deployed to France and it was that same hatred that compelled the Allies to keep on fighting through the horrors of trench warfare
Trench warfare on the Western Front in World War I Included all of the following EXCEP
Select the best answer from the choices provided.
A. Attacks with thousands of men trying to capture enemy trenches
ius
B. tanks, airplanes, and machine guns
C. gas attacks with chemical weapons
OD.
armles advancing hundreds of miles in a single
Answer:
b
Explanation:
positive
30pts for help and crown
How were Ralph Bunche and Paul Robeson different?
Select the best answer from the choices provided.
A.
Bunche had served in the military during the war but Robeson had not.
B.
Bunche worked for the U.S. government, but Robeson was disliked by the government.
C.
Bunche expressed support for redlining, while Robeson was firmly against it.
D.
No answer is correct.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Answer:
C
Explanation:
I just think it is
What are the four main goals of foreign policy?
Answer:
Preserving the national security of the United States.
Promoting world peace and a secure global environment.
Maintaining a balance of power among nations.
Working with allies to solve international problems.
Explanation:
Hope this helps.
U.S. foreign policy focuses on four main goals: protection of the United States, citizens, and allies; assurance of access to international resources and markets; preservation of a global balance of power; and protection of human rights and democracy.
Explanation:The four main goals of U.S. foreign policy are as follows:
Protection of the United States and its citizens and allies: This entails safety both domestically and abroad, spanning both military and economic threats from other nations, terrorist groups, or high tariffs on trade.Assurance of continuing access to international resources and markets: This means maintaining access to essential resources like oil and economic resources. It also includes access to international marketplaces for goods that American consumers might want and advancing the interests of U.S. businesses both domestically and globally.Preservation of a balance of power in the world: There is no true world-level authority dictating the relations among nations. U.S. foreign policy seeks to help maintain a balance of power among countries and their governments.Protection of human rights and democracy: The United States attempts to support international peace, human rights, and democracy through its foreign policy, including aspects such as foreign aid and involvement in international organizations like the United Nations, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), etc.Learn more about U.S. Foreign Policy here:https://brainly.com/question/29444315
#SPJ2
Explain the difference between domestic and foreign policy.
Answer:
The difference between foreign and domestic policy is that one concerns states and international institutions, while the other concerns all of the factors in a specific place. The term “foreign policy” encompasses all actions made by a country in the international context with regard to other States or to international institutions. Conversely, the term “domestic policy” refers to all actions and decisions related to issues concerning the domestic sphere of a country, including business, the environment, health care, education, taxes, energy, social welfare, collective and individual rights, law enforcement, housing, immigration, military, religion, and the economy.
ASAP PLEASE HELP
What is written about in The Aeneid?
daily life in Rome
Roman religion
the founding of Rome
the Roman emperor Augustus
Answer:
The founding of Rome
Explanation:
The Aeneid is an epic poem written by Virgil. It tells the story of Aeneas, a Trojan who is destined to find Rome. This poem was written in the Golden Age of Rome.
The correct option is C.
What was the Aeneid about and what did it explain?
The Aeneid is a Latin epic poem, written by Virgil between 29 and 19 BC, that tells the legendary story of Aeneas, a Trojan who fled the fall of Troy and traveled to Italy, where he became the ancestor of the Romans.
What is the main idea of the Aeneid?Fate is one of the major themes of the epic, the Aeneid, governing the whole epic, as well as the whole life of the protagonist, Aeneas. His determination to lay the foundation for his son and generations to come is to be fulfilled at every cost.
Learn more about the Aeneid here https://brainly.com/question/26556980
#SPJ2
What are the three inspirations that led to writing the Declaration of Independence
Which type of fire is sometimes set as a way to protect a forest?
camp fire
surface fire
crown fire
O forest fire
Answer:
surface fire
Explanation:
The type of fire is sometimes set as a way to protect a forest is: surface fire.
Surface fire can be defined as the fire that burn only the surface area of the area the fire is light on in the forest.
The type of fire does not cause much damage in the forest as they do not start from the underground and they are very easy to quench.
Therefore the type of fire is sometimes set as a way to protect a forest is: surface fire.
Learn more about surface fire here; https://brainly.com/question/15207256
#SPJ2
[PLEASE HURRY!] How do you think Native Americans reacted to the Lewis and Clark expedition when they first saw it?
There were alot of Indian tribes Lewis and Clark met, some of them welcomed them, others were fearful of them, and others threatened them.
Hope this helps!
this quotation most clearly anticipates which amendment in the bill of rights
A. First
B. Second
C. Fourth
D. Fifth
Answer:
it's the first amendment
Explanation:
talks about religion and freedom in the quote provided
How did Common Sense influence the Declaration of Independence?
by using most of the language and format of the Declaration
by persuading the Continental Congress to meet and discuss independence
O by introducing many of the ideas the Declaration later expressed
by suggesting authors who could write the Declaration
Answer: by introducing many of the ideas the Declaration later expressed
Explanation: hope this helped ✌️
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Write two paragraphs describing the different points of view in the following scenarios:
In the first paragraph, you are a Republican senator who has just returned to Congress to find that O.M. Roberts, former president of the Texas Secession Convention is now a U.S. senator from that state. As a dedicated member of the United States Senate, explain why you believe it is wrong for Roberts to be there.
In the second paragraph you will take the part of O.M. Roberts. Explain why you believe you should represent Texas in the Senate despite your leadership in the Texas Secession Convention.
Republican senator:
O.M. Roberts:
Answer:No secession ball will mark the day. Nor, it appears, are any other commemorative events planned by Texas, which would rather boast of its time as an independent country. But 150 years ago today, shortly after 11 a.m. on Feb. 1, 1861, a state convention voted overwhelmingly to secede from the Union.
In Austin, on the second floor of the old Texas statehouse just south of the current Capitol building (near the present-day Alamo and Texas Rangers monuments), cheering delegates to the special convention approved a short document declaring that the federal government was becoming "a weapon with which to strike down the interests and prosperity of the people of Texas and her Sister slaveholding States." Texas, they stated, was henceforth a "separate Sovereign state ... absolved from all allegiance to the United States." (An even more explicit "declaration of causes" followed a day later; it's well worth a read.)
For one aging veteran in the hall, this was the blackest of days. Sam Houston, the 67-year-old governor of Texas (who had twice served as president of the Republic of Texas), had for years almost single-handedly kept secessionist sentiment in the state at bay, despite being a slaveholder himself. Nearly three decades earlier, Houston had fought for Texan independence from Mexico and guided the fledgling Republic into the Union. He did not want to lose his life's work. "Mark me, the day that produces a dissolution of this [Union] will be written in the blood of humanity," Houston, then a U.S. senator, told Congress in 1854 as he defied Southern predilections to vote against the Kansas-Nebraska Act.
Of himself, he had said: "I wish no prouder epitaph to mark the board or slab that may lie on my tomb than this: 'He loved his country, he was a patriot; he was devoted to the Union.'"
As secessionist fever swept Texas, Houston was denounced as a "traitor-knave" for his Unionist views. Always, though, when the grand old man — who still hobbled from a wound sustained at San Jacinto in 1836 — took the stage, he had been able to quell his rivals. But as the year 1860 drew to a close, with Abraham Lincoln's election causing South Carolina to secede and other states to teeter on the brink, Houston, despite being governor, could no longer hold back the tide.
He tried. When secessionists began clamoring for a special legislative session in anticipation of secession, Houston stalled. Soon, however, a secession convention at the end of January 1861 appeared inevitable. Houston convened a special session of the Legislature just before the convention, hoping that he could somehow persuade lawmakers to rein in the proceedings.
It was not to be. The delegates — chosen in a hastily organized election in early January — convened in Austin on Jan. 28, 1861, and quickly penned a document that would sever Texas' ties to the federal government. Houston was invited to the roll call on Feb. 1. He sat "grim and motionless," writes his biographer M.K. Wisehart. One man called him a traitor to his face, though Houston's allies swiftly demanded (and received) an apology. The delegates approved the secession ordinance, 166-8.
The governor won a few concessions, however. He had said he would swallow secession if the people ratified it — so it was put to a vote on Feb. 23, 1861, and the people affirmed it, 44,317 to 13,020. Houston tried to argue that Texas voters had merely approved secession, rather than latching onto the Confederacy. This was technically true, but the governor, who preferred that Texas should return to its old status as an independent country, had lost his sway. In March, Texas became the last state to join the Confederacy in the "first wave," before hostilities broke out at Fort Sumter.
A defiant Houston would swear no oath to the Confederacy, and he was finished as governor. "Fellow citizens, in the name of your rights and liberties, which I believe have been trampled upon, I refuse to take this oath," he declared on March 16, 1861. "In the name of the nationality of Texas, I refuse to take this oath. …" Nor would he live to see the end of the war he tried so hard to avert; he died in 1863, a year after the Battle of Shiloh, in which his son, Sam Jr., a Confederate soldier, was wounded and held prisoner for months. Texas, in fact, would become the site of the last battle of the Civil War, in May 1865. It was also the last rebel state readmitted to the Union, on March 30, 1870, subject to several conditions.
There is another peculiar post-script to the secessionist drama of 1861.
Oddly enough, one Robert E. Lee was living in Texas at that time. Lee had been stationed in Texas on and off for several years, commanding the Second United States Cavalry in frontier skirmishes against Comanches and Mexicans. He didn't seem too fond of the frontier life; he wrote to his wife of living of a "desert of dullness."
Answer:
A man who has openly opposed the U.S (Constitution) should not be allowed to make laws affecting the country. Now that the Confederacy has lost the war, former leaders may seek to bring down the U.S. by other means. If Texas is sincere about wanting to re-join the Union, it must select leaders who favor a Union. Roberts’ defense of himself as senator may include: He was fairly elected by the citizens of Texas. It is up to the voters of Texas to say who will represent them, not another senator who simply does not agree with Roberts’ former politics. For the country to reunite and move forward, it is necessary to bury the past.
Explanation:
Explain the conditions given to the Confederates as part of their surrender?
Why was appeasement a foreign policy failure for Great Britain and France?
O
A. The United States was committed to drawing Germany into a
military conflict.
O
B. The formation of the Tripartite Pact forced Germany to rapidly
secure new lands.
O
C. German leaders could not be trusted to honor agreements with
other countries.
O
D. The Soviet Union began to expand into territories Germany agreed
to leave.
SUBMIT
Answer:ITS C!!I just took the quiz and A was wrong
Explanation:
AP
Appeasement a foreign policy was a failure for Great Britain and France because
German leaders could not be trusted to honor agreements with
What was appeasement policy of Great Britain and France?Instituted in the hope of avoiding war, appeasement was the name given to Britain's policy in the 1930s of allowing Hitler to expand German territory unchecked. Most closely associated with British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, it is now widely discredited as a policy of weakness.
Why did the appeasement policy fail?Appeasement failed because Hitler was unappeasable. He sought not to adjust the European balance of power in Germany's favor, but rather to overthrow it. He wanted a German-ruled Europe that would have eliminated France and Britain as European powers.
What did the policy of appeasement result in?What was the result of appeasement? Appeasement reached its climax in September 1938 with the Munich Agreement. Chamberlain hoped to avoid a war over Czechoslovakia by conceding to Adolf Hitler's demands. The Agreement allowed Nazi Germany to annex the Sudetenland, the German-speaking parts of Czechoslovakia.
How did the policy of appeasement affect France and Great Britain?The policy of appeasement affected France and Great Britain because France was not prepared for war with Germany, while Great Britain was left to fight Germany alone after France was conquered.
Was appeasement a good policy?Appeasement was said to have been beneficial because it provided the Allies with more time to prepare for war. However, the idea that the Munich Agreement had restored peace fooled the Allies into a stagnant state since none of them were fully prepared for the war when it arrived.
What was Munich agreement?British and French prime ministers Neville Chamberlain and Edouard Daladier sign the Munich Pact with Nazi leader Adolf Hitler. The agreement averted the outbreak of war but gave Czechoslovakia away to German conquest.
To learn more about appeasement policy click here
https://brainly.com/question/10629070?
#SPJ2
What did Rutherford B. Hayes agree to do if Democrats would end their election dispute and allow him to
become president?
O Hayes promised he would withdraw US troops from the South.
O Hayes promised to choose a Democratic vice-president.
O Hayes promised more money for Southern states.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
the Answer: A.
answer
is
A.
____ was an abolitionist. He helped to draft 14th Amendment. He was a Radical
Republican and he proposed Andrew Johnson's impeachment.
A) Frederick Douglass
B) Blanche K. Bruce
C) Hiram Revels
D) Thaddeus Stevens
Answer:
D) Thaddeus Stevens
Explanation:
Thaddeus Stevens, a member of the U.S. House of Representatives during Abraham Lincoln's presidency, fought to abolish slavery and helped draft the 14th Amendment during Reconstruction.
Answer:
d
Explanation:
I took the test nskskzjzk
How did the industrial Revolution begin?