The nurse should question about the use of heparin sodium in the physician’s drug order to a hemorrhagic stroke patient.
Explanation:
A hemorrhagic stroke leads to impaired brain functioning due to bursting of a blood vessel and resultant bleeding in the brain.
When an anticoagulant like heparin is administered to a hemorrhagic stroke patient, it increases the risk of further bleeding from the weakened arteries.
Heparin is administered to reduce or remove any blood clots; however, as a blood thinner, it poses an increased risk of further bleeding or hemorrhage just related to the heparin itself. Blood clotting time should be monitored by coagulation tests while administering heparin-based drugs like heparin sodium.
Complications from heparin sodium can lead to adrenal, ovarian, or retroperitoneal hemorrhage.
In the case of a hemorrhagic stroke, a nurse should question the use of thrombolytic agents. These drugs are useful in cases of clot-caused strokes (thrombotic stroke), but not for strokes caused by bleeding (hemorrhagic stroke), where they could potentially exacerbate the condition.
Explanation:In the context of a client with a hemorrhagic stroke, the nurse should question an order for a thrombolytic agent. These are a class of drugs that break down clots, and although they are beneficial in a thrombotic stroke (a stroke due to a clot), using them in a hemorrhagic stroke could worsen the condition. Hemorrhagic strokes are caused by bleeding, not clotting. Administering drugs like tissue plasminogen activator, an example of a thrombolytic agent, may promote more bleeding instead of improving the situation. Hence, it's crucial to recognize the underlying cause of the stroke before starting a particular treatment.
Learn more about Stroke Medication here:https://brainly.com/question/28425123
#SPJ3
How have the social determinants of tobacco use changed as a result of public health interventions?
The addictive nature of tobacco use has increased.
Stress caused from smoking behavior has increased.
The chronic diseases caused by smoking have changed.
Attitudes and information about smoking have changed.
Attitudes and information about smoking have changed.
Explanation:
Positive transformation of human attitude towards smoking due to increased knowledge and information regarding the ill effects of smoking have been a great social determinant of tobacco use.
The socioeconomic, educational, cultural, and political conditions that an individual lives in determine his/her attitude or behavior towards smoking.
When a region prohibits public smoking, families living in the region and their culture condemn smoking as a social evil, banning promotion of tobacco products, highlighting the warning signs or health hazards due to smoking, control and prevention awareness programs, etc has made the people to be more aware of the dangerous side effects of smoking.
This knowledge transforms the attitudes which make an individual refrain from smoking.
Please 30 what? A or D
Answer:
Its A
Explanation: