Answer:
Mrs. Brown's flight landed at 10:43 a.m.
Explanation:
Mrs. Brown's flight left at 9:20. An hour from 9 is 10. 20 plus 23 is 43. Together, they make 10:43 a.m.
Answer:
10:43 a.m
If it is 9:20 and you add an hour and 23 minutes its 10:43
What type of health insurance option did Barack Obama sign into law
Answer: Mandatory Insurance -(APEX)
The type of health insurance option that did Barack Obama sign into law was the Mandatory Insurance.
What is Mandatory Insurance?A Mandatory insurance is also called as the compulsory insurance. It is defined as any sort of insurance that any individual or business firm is lawfully compelled to acquire.
Person and undertakings that arousal to prosecute in definite financially hazardous activities must have obligatory insurance in a case like driving a car or running a business with employees.
This was the sort of health insurance option that President Barack Obama signed into law.
Therefore, the health insurance option did Barack Obama sign into law was the Mandatory Insurance.
Learn more about the Mandatory Insurance, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/4219950
#SPJ2
Read the opening to the Gettysburg Address, and then answer the questions.
How long is “four score and seven years?”
years
"Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated can long endure."
Answer:
87 years
Explanation:
A score is a term that is not common anymore, but that refers to a period of 20 years. Therefore, when Lincoln refers to "four score" he is referrencing 80 years. "Four score and seven," therefore, means 87 years. As the speech was read in 1863, 87 years refers to 1776, the year the Declaration of Independence was signed.
There are lots of greats quotes. The length of the score called the “four score and seven years" is said to be 87 years.
What is “Four score and seven years ago"?.Lincoln's was said to have started his address with “Four score and seven years ago.” He said that a score is equal to 20 years, so he implied that the referencing is way back 87 years ago, that is in the 1776. This was said to be the time when the Declaration of Independence was signed.
Conclusively, the The speech was said to be termed as, seven score and seven years ago.
Learn more about score from
https://brainly.com/question/11052939
Plz help I need an answer soon!!! What type of government was created in China after Sun Yat-sen stepped down?
Answer:
A provisional government
Explanation:
Autocracy was created in China
Which of the following most accurately describes the extent of Alexander the Great's empire?
1. From Greece and Egypt to the Middle East and northeastern part of the Indian
Subcontinent
2. From Greece to Spain, Portugal, and northeastern Africa
3. From Greece to China, including lands north of the Caspian Sea
4. The land all around the Mediterranean Sea, including Greece and Italy
Answer:
From Greece and Egypt to the Middle East and northeastern part of the Indian Subcontinent. - first choice 1.
Answer:
Option 1.
Explanation:
From Greece and Egypt to the Middle East and northeastern part of Indian Subcontinent, is the right answer.
Alexander third of Macedon is known as Alexander the Great. He belonged to the Argead dynasty and ruled the Kingdom of Macedon. His vast empire included the territory of Greece, Egypt, Persia, and northwest India. It was due to his campaigns that the contact between the east and west extended.
What three powers met at the Potsdam Conference?
Answer:
UK US Soviet Union
Explanation:
The leading and victorious factions went near Berlin to meet and define a new world order: foreseeking the emergence of a division between socialist and capitalist worlds they outlined policies that would later transform into the so called Iron curtain.
Postdam Conference defined the military occupation and necessary reconstruction of Germany secure borders, an a new European landscape
Stalin had made it clear that Eastern Europe was to came under his influence and control for making a buffer zone in case of any repeated aggression.
Furthermore the territories regained by the Red army were to came occupied and a policy of rebuilding and rearranging took later place.
Churchill and Truman outlined the question of Germany which turned to be a source of disagreement.
Still the Postdam Conference was a diplomatic effort to put in clear terms a new agenda for the aftermath of the war was paid highly by all members.
The three powers that met at the Potsdam Conference were:
The United StatesThe United KingdomThe Soviet UnionWhat was the Potsdam Conference all about?
The Potsdam Conference was a meeting of the leaders of the victorious Allied powers in World War II. The conference was held in Potsdam, Germany, from July 17 to August 2, 1945. The three powers that met at the Potsdam Conference were:
The United States: The United States was represented by President Harry S. Truman.The United Kingdom: The United Kingdom was represented by Prime Minister Clement Attlee.The Soviet Union: The Soviet Union was represented by Premier Joseph Stalin.The Potsdam Conference was a continuation of the Yalta Conference, which had been held in February 1945. The main purpose of the Potsdam Conference was to discuss the terms of surrender for Germany and to make plans for the postwar occupation of Germany.
Find more exercises on Potsdam Conference;
https://brainly.com/question/11308197
#SPJ6
Why did the Serbians challenge the Austrians?
They wanted to start a war in Europe
They wanted independence from the empire
They wanted the Germans to leave their homeland
They wanted to be allowed free trade with all nations
Final answer:
The Serbians challenged the Austrians because they sought to expand Serbia's independence and create a Serbian-dominated Balkans, particularly after assassinating the Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand, which led Austria-Hungary, with Germany's support, to declare war on Serbia.
Explanation:
The Serbians challenged the Austrians primarily because they wanted independence from the empire and aimed to unite the Balkans under Serbian dominance. Serbia had gained its independence from the Ottoman Empire and, similar to Piedmont's role in unifying Italy, hoped to play a central role in uniting the Balkans. The assassination of the Austrian Archduke Franz Ferdinand by a Serbian nationalist sparked a crisis. Austria-Hungary, with a blank check assurance from Germany, issued an ultimatum to Serbia, which Serbia could not fully accept without losing its sovereignty. After Serbia's partial compliance with Austrian demands was rejected, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, which in turn activated a series of alliances leading to World War I.
What is the purpose of the Antarctic Treaty?
to divide possession of Antarctica among major investor nations
to outline rules for land and resources management in Antarctica
to prevent settlement conflicts in Antarctica
to define what kinds of scientific study can be done in Antarctica
to define what kinds of scientific study can be done in Antarctica
Location A is ________.
A.Egypt b.canaan c.mediterranean sea d.syrian desert
the answer is c i think
Will Give Brainliest!!!!!
What is the Mandate of Heaven and how does it explain the rise/fall of the Tang and Song dynasties?
Answer:
“The Mandate of Heaven (天命) was a principle used to justify the power of the emperor of China, as well as explaining suitability for the office. According to this belief, heaven bestows its mandate to a just ruler, the Son of Heaven.
6. Why did immigrants turn to political machines?
Answer:
Immigrants supported political machines because they provided jobs
Explanation:
If its multiple choice please specify :)
Political machine, in U.S. politics, a party organization, headed by a single boss or small autocratic group, that commands enough votes to maintain political and administrative control of a city, county, or state.
The rapid growth of American cities in the 19th century, a result of both immigration and migration from rural areas, created huge problems for city governments, which were often poorly structured and unable to provide services. In those conditions, political machines—such as Tammany Hall, run by boss William Magear Tweed (1823–73) in New York City—were able to build a loyal voter following, especially among immigrant groups, by performing such favours as providing jobs or housing.
Political machines are characterized by a disciplined and hierarchical organization, reaching down to neighbourhood and block organizers, that enables the machine to respond to the problems of individual neighbourhoods, or even families, in exchange for loyalty at the polls. The term refers to their ability to elect candidates or enact measures with mechanical efficiency and predictability.
Although the primary goal of a political machine is keeping itself in power rather than providing good government, machines have been responsible for restructuring city governments to centralize authority, improving facilities and services, helping to assimilate immigrant groups, and encouraging the growth of business and industry. Supporters of political machines say that they “work” and that consolidating power in the hands of a boss, like Mayor Richard J. Daley (1902–76) of Chicago, guarantees city governments the power and authority that they need to cope with urban problems effectively. However, because political machines in such cities as Boston, Philadelphia, New York, Pittsburgh, Chicago, and Kansas City have also been responsible for many abuses of power, the term carries a pejorative sense.
Organizers who “deliver” the votes are often rewarded with patronage jobs. However, patronage can result in poorer service to the citizens because appointees may be neither qualified for their jobs nor interested in performing them. Control of both elective and appointed posts also gives a machine control of government salaries and revenues, which can be used to enrich the party at the public’s expense. For example, the machine may accept donations or kickbacks from businesses in return for such favours as tax or zoning concessions or the award of lucrative public-works contracts. In some cities, machine business dealings have included accepting money from organized-crime syndicates in exchange for protection from legal interference.
In cities whose neighbourhoods are divided along ethnic or racial lines, machine patronage may aggravate hostilities by awarding most jobs and services to those people of the same background as the city’s power elite. In practice, this made machine politics the last defense of white neighbourhoods against growing black populations, while black politicians who anticipated power viewed their constituents as merely the latest in a series of ethnic or racial groups that had benefited from the machine.
Since the 19th-century heyday of machine politics, civil service reforms limiting the number of patronage jobs, the institution of direct primaries rather than party nomination of candidates, the municipal operation of public utilities, and judicial review by state and federal courts have all reduced the power of political machines. The steady exodus of city residents to the suburbs since World War II and a more mobile population with fewer ties to particular neighbourhoods have also weakened the social base that once made political machines synonymous with city government.
Who believed power should not be concentrated in the hands of one individual
John Locke believed that power shouldn’t be concentrated in the hands of one individual.
Answer:
Baron de Montesquieu
What best describes how advances in agriculture affected the growth of cities
Answer:
Enough food was produced to feed growing populations.
Which legislative group in England backed the non-Separatist Puritans who wanted
to reform the Church from within?
Answer: parliament
Explanation:In 1629, a group of non-Separatist Puritans sought a charter to form the Massachusetts Bay Colony. This group did not want to separate from the Church; they wanted to reform the Church from within. Significant to their backing was Parliament, which is the supreme legislative body of government in the United Kingdom.
Answer:
parliament
Explanation:
how did george w bush react to 911?
The 9/11 events brought lot of fear among the American public, as well as lot of rage and hatred toward the ones that did it and the organization that sponsored it. The president at that time, George W. Bush, was furious, and he instantly declared a war on the terrorism, namely al-Qaeda. This resulted in mobilizing lot of American soldiers toward the places that were seen as the basis of this organization, so the invasion of Afghanistan happened. This resulted in a a lot of bloodshed, as the terrorist attacks intensified even more as the US soldiers were taking bit by bit of their ground. Eventually, al-Qaeda was defeated and its leader Ossama Bin Laden was captured and murdered.
Final answer:
President George W. Bush's response to 9/11 included a speech at Ground Zero, a shift to a foreign policy focus on national security, and initiating the War on Terror. His administration's actions led to a significant rally in public approval ratings, though support for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan later eroded.
Explanation:
Following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, President George W. Bush exhibited leadership aimed at uniting and reassuring the nation during a time of crisis. In the aftermath, he delivered a memorable speech at Ground Zero where he expressed solidarity with New York and the nation, and vowed vengeance against the attackers. He swiftly reoriented his administration from a domestic focus to prioritizing national security and foreign intervention, culminating in the War on Terror. The unprecedented attacks led to a sharp increase in President Bush's approval ratings as Americans rallied around his response, which included the authorization to use military force and the eventual invasion of Iraq based on the belief—later proved incorrect—that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.
compare and contrast the reactions of the turks and iranians to modernization. how were they different? what factors did they have in common?
Answer:
Both countries were able to modernize albeit at different times in history, with the changes being led by the indigenous elite and not by external western forces.
Explanation:
Both Turkey and Iran have common factors. They were both Muslims countries and both the countries were the few who remained Independent and were not colonized by the West.
Hence, all modernization was led by factions within the society.
However, things turned out to be slightly different. Turkey's founder Kemal Ataturk was an autocratic but believed that he was paving the way for democracy.
On the other hand, Iran's leader Reza Shah Pahvali become an increasingly automatic leader who did not believe in democracy.
Turkey gradually became a 'Military democracy' where elections were held, but the Army held a lot of power to influence internal and external politics.
Iran became a theocracy which also has a powerful army.
What is common now in both countries is how the kemalist and and Islamic policies are increasingly under attack by a new wave of young people.
why did the united states want to contain communism
answer fast i’ll pay u
The US wanted to contain communism because that wanted Money.
PLEASE HELP
The Songhai Empire was very large, and parts of it were located in the Sahara Desert. What natural disasters were the biggest problems for Songhai residents who lived in the Sahara Desert?
A. drought
B. flooding
C.storms
D. forest fires
What was one way religion affected Puritan life?
A. Puritans enjoyed celebrating many religious holidays.
B. People of all religions were welcomed in Puritan villages.
c. People were punished publicly for committing a sin.
D. Education was reserved for church leaders only.
SUBMIT
People were punished publicly for committing a sin, was one way religion affected Puritan life.
What is Religion?There is no scholarly agreement regarding what exactly qualifies as a religion.
Religion is typically defined as a social-cultural system of predetermined behaviors and practices, morals, beliefs, worldviews, texts, sanctified places, prophecies, ethics, or organizations.
Who are Puritans?English Protestants known as Puritans believed that the Church of England needed further reform and a turn toward Protestantism in the 16th and 17th century.
They wished to rid the Church of England of Roman Catholic practices. English history was significantly influenced by puritanism, particularly under the Protectorate.
Hence, option C is correct.
To learn more about Puritans here
https://brainly.com/question/17737677
#SPJ2
define capitalism. what factor determines whether a country’s economy is more or less capitalist?
Answer:
read below :)
Explanation:
Capitalist economies are those where there is a free market: free flow of economic capital.
The decision-makers and investment can move freely , and the prices and distributions of goods and services are in a continuous exchange as the market dictates.
The market is not restrained by governments or other agencies, so it is said to freely operate in terms of demand and offer.
Most of the countries today are said to be capitalist, since few exceptions could still comply with the socialist ideals.
In a capitalist environment , competition occurs as forces in a global market economy, and countries are the scenarios where actors play.
The opposed model of state intervention in the economy and intromission in the market is disappearing, at least according to classical marxist premises.
(Examples: Venezuela, Vietnam, North Korea)
Some countries have social democracies, with important intervention in some key areas like education: climate and environment. The representative countries like these are the Scandinavians.
Capitalism is the use of private resources to make a profit. Whether a country is more or less capitalistic is determined by the amount of government influence in answering the basic economic questions.
SAMPLE RESPONSE ANSWERS WILL VARY
HOPE THIS HELPS!!!!! :)
<3333333333
Should the government protect workers from unfair and unsafe jobs?
Final answer:
New York should evaluate the labor market impact of policies intended to ensure worker safety and fair employment practices, offering support without discouraging labor demand or supply. Safety regulations should be enforced, and businesses encouraged to adopt safer practices. Over-regulation and rigid employment laws must be balanced against economic growth and employment stimulation.
Explanation:
When considering policies to ensure worker safety and fair employment practices, the state of New York should carefully evaluate the impact such policies have on the labor market. To adequately protect workers without unduly discouraging the supply and demand of labor, New York could implement strategies such as providing efficient job search assistance, designing support programs that encourage reemployment, reassessing restrictive business regulations, and offering worker education and training. Additionally, balancing the benefits of labor unions with their impact on hiring practices could contribute to a more dynamic labor market.
Ensuring worker safety is not just about preventing unemployment but also about creating a work environment that respects the well-being of workers. The state could reinforce safety regulations in workplaces, provide incentives for businesses to adopt safer practices, and enhance enforcement of existing labor laws to maintain high standards of worker safety.
Finally, addressing issues such as over-regulated business practices, rigid firing and layoff regulations, and high minimum wages must be guided by the objective to stimulate economic growth and employment, while also safeguarding workers' rights to safe and fair working conditions.
How are the Great Depression’s effects on the German economy similar to or different from its effects on the U.S. economy?
Answer:
The Effects were similar.
Explanation:
The effects were similar, because they both had to deal with the existing problem of the Great Depression.
While the effects of the Great Depression were similar, you must note the way they handled the problems were differently.
The US, with her strong democratic background, was able to weather the storm of the Great Depression.
On the other hand, Germany's newly created government did not have the capability to deal with the amounting pressure of paying back the war debt & reparation as well as dealing with the GD. This led to the rise of Fascist leaders and the popularity of one now known as Adolf Hitler, who led the country into a warring state that soon led to the militirization of the country and the expansion of the Nazi regime.
Why Does History Matter?
History connects the past with the present. History matters because it helps us as individuals and as societies to understand why our societies are the way they are and what they value.The answer is that History is inescapable. It studies the past and the legacies of the past in the present.
Answer/Explanation: Whether history matters in the grand scheme of things, however, is a concept that is somewhat relative: relative to current events, relative to political agenda and relative to political stability given that it is dangerously ambiguous in terms of influencing opinions. And it helps you identify choices that were not correct and it gives you the chance to reflect and do better on it next time.Basically weather it matters or not is up to your opinion.
Why was the Hernandez v. Texas case important in the fight against discrimination?
A. It ruled that it was illegal to use federal funds to aid any state or activity in which racial segregation is practiced.
B. It ruled that African Americans are not the only ethnic group to be protected by the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
C. It ruled that states are required to provide separate but equal schools for African Americans.
D. It ruled that the desegregation of children in public school based on race was illegal.
the answer to this question is c
The Hernandez v. Texas case expanded the Fourteenth Amendment's protections to include Mexican Americans, establishing their rights to Equal Protection and addressing systemic discrimination.
Explanation:The Hernandez v. Texas case was important in the fight against discrimination because it marked a significant expansion of the civil rights protections afforded by the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court's unanimous decision established that the Fourteenth Amendment's protections extend beyond just African Americans to other ethnic groups, specifically including those of Mexican ancestry. This was a landmark ruling as it recognized Mexican Americans as a distinct class entitled to Equal Protection under the Fourteenth Amendment, overturning a history of exclusion from jury service and addressing institutionalized discrimination within the judicial system.
What's topic would the organization of American states most likely address?
A. How to deal with the whole crisis in a given region
B. How to combat revolutionary movements
C. How to maintain necessary trade barriers
D. How to promote socialist economic policies
I have a few more if someone is willing to help me.
The correct answer is A) how to deal with the whole crisis in a given region.
The topic that the Organization of American States would most likely address is how to deal with the whole crisis in a given region.
The Organization of American States or OAS was created to promote cultural, economic, and military aid in the case any of its members need it. Most of the countries in America are part of OAS. It was formally signed on April 30, 1948, during the Bogota, Colombia Ninth-Panamerican Conference. The last member to join OAS was Canada, in 1990. OAS' members take care of each other interests and avoid other countries intervention in American Countries.
Which of these events occurred first
Answer:
D) Britain blockaded Germany.
Explanation:
NEED BY TODAY
1. What is the effect of just-in-time inventory strategies?
a. They expand businesses with the use of worldwide telecommunication.
b. They increase business efficiency by reducing inventory costs.
c. They outsource manufacturing jobs to underdeveloped nations.
d. They eliminate the need for tasks such as welding and assembling.
2. Which factor has encouraged technological innovation?
a. the rise of organized labor
b. restricted immigration
c. the defeat of communism
d. global competition
Answer:
Explanation:
What is the effect of just-in-time inventory strategies?
b. They increase business efficiency by reducing inventory costs.
Explanation: Just-in-time (JIT) inventory strategies aim to streamline production processes by minimizing inventory holding costs and waste. By reducing the amount of inventory held in stock and relying on timely deliveries of materials, businesses can save on storage costs, reduce the risk of inventory obsolescence, and improve cash flow. Therefore, option (b) correctly identifies the effect of just-in-time inventory strategies.
Which factor has encouraged technological innovation?
d. global competition
Explanation: Global competition has been a significant driver of technological innovation. In a competitive global market, businesses strive to stay ahead of rivals by improving efficiency, reducing costs, and offering innovative products and services. This competition fosters an environment where companies are incentivized to invest in research and development (R&D), adopt new technologies, and innovate to meet the evolving needs and preferences of consumers. Therefore, option (d) accurately identifies a factor that has encouraged technological innovation.
Why did the United States get in the war in Korea
Answer:
In 1950 the Korea Peninsula was divided between a Soviet-backed government in the north and an American-backed government in the south. The division of Korea into two halves had come at the end of World War II. In August of 1945 the Soviet Union invaded Korea, which had been under Japan's control since 1910
Explanation:
someone please help !!!
Answer:
The correct answer is D- he turns his back to the telescreen. The reason it is rebellious is th telescreens are controlled by the ruling party, and they use the screens to monitor everyone's actions and speech. By turning his back on the screen, he is turning his back on the ruling party, as he points out, "even a back can be revealing."
Explanation:
In 1991 the Soviet Union collapsed MAINLY because
A) key Soviet leaders were assassinated.
B) a civil war erupted in the southern republics.
C) the United States was a better country and capitalism ruled the world.
D) years of economic stagnation left it far behind Western and Asian countries.
✌good luck and i hope you have a good grade because im not good at my grade or at school
love ya
the bicameral nature of the the us federal legislature is responsible for:
Answer:
The bicameral nature of the U.S. Federal legislature is responsible for (D) The presence of both an upper and lower chamber of Congress.
Explanation:
This system serve as a form of check and balances that limit the power of the legislative branch of the government.
Answer:
The bicameral nature of the U.S. Federal legislature is responsible for C. the division of congressional power between two chambers*.
Explanation:
Under the U.S. Constitution, the national legislature's nature is bicameral. This means that the Congress is composed of two different chambers: the House of Representatives (where the members are allocated according to the state's population) and the Senate (where each state has two members.)
This bicameral system prevents the legislative branch from having excesive power by providing procedures that divide congressional power, known as checks and balances.
*This question was answered assuming the possible answers were:
A. Congress's reliance on committees to review proposals for new laws.
B. the expectation that members of Congress will represent their home districts.
C. the division of congressional power between two chambers.
D. gerrymandering in congressional districts during reapportionment.