Marie Devers 1I usually don’t like to admit this, but at one time I disliked history. My teacher, Mr. Wittmeyer, was wonderful, and the material seemed interesting. When I listened to his lectures, however, I inevitably drifted off, got called on to answer, and had absolutely no clue what to say. 2Last month, we studied the Juch family of Poland. Jennalee Juch was a traveling musician who played her music all over the Austrian countryside. Her biography amazed me because I was a musician who played the piano, and I always wanted to travel across Europe. Suddenly, in my mind, I was a fifteenth-century troubadour packing her belongings and heading to the mountains. Next thing I knew, Mr. Wittmeyer asked me a question about whichever topic the class had moved on to, and as usual, I couldn’t answer. 3That’s how I did feel (notice the past tense) about history and social studies—that is—until Mr. Wittmeyer gave us a project that changed everything. 4The project required our whole class to visit the library and use the school computer program to research our family histories. Every year, this project is assigned to eighth graders. Everyone always gets excited that his or her family may have come from aristocracy, when in reality most of us came from farmers and commoners and people who were not much different from ourselves. I had a feeling I came from a long line of ancestors who were just like me: average. 5Mr. Wittmeyer directed my classmates and me to the computer laboratory and taught us how to use the program installed on the computers. The program allowed students to search their names to discover information about their ancestors. 6While using the software, I learned that my last name revealed that my ancestors had come from Italy. The computer quickly found links to biographies of my family members who had lived long ago. I learned that one of my relatives had been married to the brother of an Italian prime minister! Because my ancestor was a very high-profile person, information was easy to locate. My ancestor had been a musician. She played something called the harpsichord, a forerunner of the piano. 7I found it difficult to believe that one of my ancestors and I had such an authentic connection. The software showed me a picture of my ancestor, and I immediately noticed a resemblance. I daydreamed about an assembly with my fascinating relatives where we discussed the revolutionary changes between their time and mine. 8At the conclusion of our class period, after my classmates gathered around my computer to witness my gigantic discovery, I made sure to personally thank Mr. Wittmeyer because his project helped me learn to love history. Read the passage on the left to answer the following questions: 9) Which actions of the narrator show that she dislikes history? A) She thanks Mr. Wittmeyer for his teaching. B) She describes the material as interesting. C) She drifts off when the teacher talks about history. D) She learns that her ancestor was an important person. 10) In this passage, the word inevitably means A) absurdly. B) artificially. C) predictably. D) quietly. 11) What is the MAIN reason the author includes the story of Jennalee Juch in her narration? A) to illustrate her own absentmindedness B) to create a parallel with her own history C) to emphasize the fact that she is a musician D) to give the reader some additional entertainment

Answer:

A) a mode of action or behavior

Explanation:

i took theb test

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Answer:

D

Explanation:

The answer is d I’m sure

In "The Black Cat" by Edgar Allen Poe, the rising action begins when the narrator starts drinking and abusing the cat. The situation escalates because he feels remorse but once again drink causes him to abuse the cat and then he hangs it outside.

i think the falling action is taking place where the narrator hangs the cat. the consequence is that the cat is no longer alive. otherwise, the falling action is when he faces the consequences of his decision.

Answer:

at the beginning of the story when the narrator say he will die the following day

Explanation:

i am a teacher i just gave my students this question this answer is correct

Bootlegger and killed a man

An illogical comparison occurs when a writer compares two totally incomparable things, i.e. things that aren't of the same type. In this sentence, a speech is compared to a person, which makes it an illogical comparison.  

Final answer:

The illogical comparison in the sentence lies in contrasting Roosevelt's speech with Truman, a person. It should compare two speeches or two individuals to be logical.

Explanation:

The illogical comparison in the sentence "Franklin D. Roosevelt's speech is more revered than Truman" is that it compares a speech, which is an inanimate object, to a person (Harry Truman), rather than comparing similar categories, such as two individuals or two speeches. To correct the comparison, either the sentence should compare Roosevelt's speech with one of Truman's speeches or compare Roosevelt's reputation to Truman's as a whole.

Examples of logical comparisons would be 'Franklin D. Roosevelt's speech is more revered than one given by Truman' or 'Franklin D. Roosevelt is more revered than Truman.' The former compares two speeches, while the latter compares two people, making the comparison logical.

If I remember the story correctly...

Scout wanted to be included when they were hanging out. She didn’t want to be left out just because she was a girl.

D.the newscasters on channel 20 seems very friendly

D. Or C. Because obviously it snows in winter months

Answer: Luke peeked into the haunted house through the spooky glass window.

The correct statement is: Luke peeked into the haunted house through the spooky glass window.

We need to remove the comma between  "spooky,glass window" which will now be  spooky glass window because it is a combined word.

Therefore the correct statement will be "Luke peeked into the haunted house through the spooky glass window".

Learn more about Add or remove commas here: https://brainly.com/question/16870469

#SPJ2

Answer:In Act III, scene 2, Brutus gives a short speech to a group of plebeians, or common people of Rome. They've demanded to know why Caesar has been killed by the senators, and they seem to distrust Brutus.

Explanation:

I hope this helps you. I had to do this question last year, and this was my answer.

Answer:

C)  The mistakes men make are remembered after their deaths, but their good deeds more often die with them.

D)  If Caesar was power-hungry, it was a serious flaw, and he paid seriously for it.

Explanation:

1.  Men's mistakes outlive their good works. Antony's remark is anti-Caesar. His defects will persist, he said. He said Caesar deserved to die. So he seemed to accept Caesar's destiny. But he couldn't stop praising Caesar's great contribution to Rome. But he immediately adds that good actions are generally buried with their owners, so Caesar's should be too. So is his memory. So you may support Brutus and admire Caesar's merits. His aim was to win public support for Caesar's objectives.

2. Aristotle's thirst for power Invoking the conspirators' support. So he appears to agree with their ideas on Caesar, authority, and Brutus' dignity. Brutus and co. are adorned. Caesar's thirst for power shows he was not fully committed. But the plotters triumphed. He didn't stop there; he blamed conspirators' failures on him. Damit the conspirators are unaware of Caesar's support. Angry with Caesar's burdeners.

The answer is C. They are treated evenly and in a very matter-of-fact manner.

Answer:He is exaggerating

Answer:he is exaggerating

Explanation:

Hyphen. 5-5 example of numbers, book-naked example of words.

Answer:

Hyphen I know im 2 yrs late just ask your teacher for the assigment back

Explanation:

Answer:

im going with D

Explanation:

im goind with d because one of the options doesnt say what i would tell you the answer is and its closer to the main idea

In the given organizations of the promotions in the inquiry, the primary advertisement depends on the print medium, while the second is intuitive. These two advertisements demonstrate that public service campaigns have changed over time as the first ad relies on the print medium, while the second is interactive.

Publicizing advertisement is a showcasing correspondence that utilizes a straightforwardly supported, non-individual message to advance or sell an item, administration or thought. Backers of publicizing are normally organizations wishing to advance their items or administrations.

The explanation is that the principal promotion just expresses a message though the subsequent advertisement has depicted every one of the manners in which how the wastage of food is being dealt with and how the local area can participate through different gatherings in diminishing the wastage of food.

The print has no such message or detail. it simply communicates something specific and furnish no different subtleties to manage with it.

For more information about advertisements, refer the following link:

https://brainly.com/question/14324528

Answer:B

Explanation: Its B

A large audience. I think so if I’m wrong I’m sorry

Oratory Essay: Students deliver a self-written, ten-minute speech on a topic of their choosing. Limited in their ability to quote words directly, Original Oratory competitors craft an argument using evidence, logic, and emotional appeals. Topics range widely, and may be informative or persuasive in nature. The speech is delivered from memory. Original Oratory is a speech written by the student with the intent to inform or persuade the audience on a topic of significance. Oratory gives students the unique opportunity to showcase their voice and passion for their topic. An Oratory is not simply an essay about the topic—it is a well researched and organized presentation with evidence, logic, emotional appeals, and sometimes humor to convey a message.

Argumentive Essay: The argumentative essay is a genre of writing that requires the student to investigate a topic; collect, generate, and evaluate evidence; and establish a position on the topic in a concise manner. Argumentative essay assignments generally call for extensive research of literature or previously published material. Argumentative assignments may also require empirical research where the student collects data through interviews, surveys, observations, or experiments. Detailed research allows the student to learn about the topic and to understand different points of view regarding the topic so that she/he may choose a position and support it with the evidence collected during research. Regardless of the amount or type of research involved, argumentative essays must establish a clear thesis and follow sound reasoning.

Hope this helps you :)

Answer:

Oratory Essay: Students deliver a self-written speech on a topic of their choice.

Argumentive Essay: The argumentative essay is a type of writing that requires the student to deeply look at a topic; collect, generate, and evaluate evidence; and establish a position on the topic.

Explanation:

Answer:

situational irony

Explanation:

Situational irony can be defined as a 'discrepancy between what is expected to happen and what actually occurs in a situation.' And that's almost the exact wording of the sentence in question.

Answer is Situational Irony

Answer:

pronoun: it

noun: car

Answer: The answer is

pronoun: it

noun: car

Explanation:

Answer:

adverb phrase............

Answer: Appositive phrase

Explanation:

An appositive phrase is a noun or a noun phrase that "renames", identifies or gives further information of another noun placed right beside it. This type of phrase can be either restrictive (when it's essential to the meaning of the sentence) or nonrestrictive (when it's not essential to the sentence, and therefore should be set off with commas, dashes or brackets).

In the sentence, "a golf pro" is an appositive phrase because it is placed right beside the noun: "Raoul's sister", and it gives more information about that noun. Furthermore, it is nonrestrictive because it is not essential to the sentence and it's enclosed with commas.

Answer:

Because Malvolio is the cranky person that everybody hates so if they know that he is madly in love with Olivia, they will think is funny that a unhappy person will fall for a noble like Olivia.

Answer:

He is clearly no match for Olivia in terms of temperament or social status.

Explanation:

got it right PLATO

Answer:

Step 1:  Determine which options are correct

How does the word peevish help the reader understand Cassius’s feeling toward Octavius?

- Option A:  It reveals a deeper level of contempt when he insults Octavius.

Cassius is trying to reveal a deep level of contempt or the feeling that a person or thing is beneath consideration and worthless.  He does this to make Octavius feel like he is not important and is worthless.  Peevish means to get easily irritated.  Cassius has gotten easily irritated from the comment of Octavius.

Look at attachment

Answer:

a is correct on edge

Explanation:

Answer:

In the novel, Scout hears her father's "dangerous" question twice in Chapter 15, so she hears it a total of two times. The question is "Do you want me to do it?" and it refers to whether Atticus is willing to defend Tom Robinson in court even if it jeopardizes his own life.

Explanation:

Answer:

Aside from the horrors committed during the Holocaust in its systematic killing of jews and other Nazi prisoners of war, one of the most salient crimes against humanity was that of dehumanization. The war experiments committed by the Nazis, and the killing of people whom they did not see as "suitable" to be alive, are clear indications of two things: a) the horrific capacity of the human brain to compartmentalize even inhuman acts (that would be the Nazis) and, b) the fact that there are people who are physically able to commit these crimes "as told."

Answer: "The Lottery" is a short story written by Shirley Jackson, first published in the June 26, 1948 issue of The New Yorker. It has been defined as "one of the most famous short stories in the history of American literature".

The story is about a fictional small town in contemporary America which makes an annual rite known as "the lottery". The objective of the lottery is to pick a human as a sacrificial victim to be stoned to death to ensure the community's continued well being.

Readers' initial refusing response surprised both Jackson and The New Yorker: subscriptions were cancelled and much hate mail received throughout the summer of its first publication. The Union of South Africa banned the story.

The story has been dramatized many times and made the subject of sociological and literary analysis

Answer:

answer is C

Explanation:

Okay that is true but what is your question

I think it is every sentence must have a noun and a verb. If we are supposed to put words in the blank. A sentence also has to express a complete thought.

Answer:

a

Explanation:

Answer:

Her values

Explanation:

In this description, we learn about Jane's values. A person's values are the ethical and moral principles that a person follows in order to provide guidance and direction to his or her life. In this example, we see that some of the guiding principles that Jane adheres to are honesty and pride. We can see that honesty and pride direct Jane's life because she refuses to accept money that she believes she has not earned.

Answer:

A trip to Otty is being planned by us.

Explanation:

The sentence is in the present progressive tense. The passive voice of this tense is formed with the present progressive of the verb be (is being, in this case) and the past participle of the main verb (planned).    

Answer:

B) the intense colors of the birds.  

Explanation:

Answer:

B) the intense colors of the birds.

Explanation:

In this passage, the author describes the intense colours of the birds that he encounters. However, in order to convey this message, he compares them to plants and flowers of intense colours. He talks about birds that are brighter than flowers, whiter than lilies, shinier than goldenrod, bluer than calamus, more purple than ironwort, and redder than foxfire.

Answer:

state of assert that something is the case .typically without providing evidence or proof

A claim of definition is an argumentative statement that gives a specific interpretation to a term or concept. It is used in various contexts and requires to be supported by logical reasoning and evidence including facts, statistics, or examples.

A claim of definition is a type of argumentative claim that asserts a specific interpretation of a term, concept, or phenomenon. This claim is often used in academic, legal, and everyday contexts to establish a specific understanding of an element. For instance, in an argument over climate change, one might make a claim of definition that 'sustainable' means actions that do not deplete resources or harm the environment, framing the rest of the argument around this definition.

In mathematics or science, a claim of definition might be, “Protons are positively charged, and electrons are negatively charged.” The result of an experiment then provides evidence supporting this claim. In an argument about history or social studies, one could claim, “The end of the South African system of apartheid was inevitable,” supported by reasoning and evidence from historical events and trends.

While forming a claim, it is essential to support it with logical reasoning and ample evidence, which may include facts, statistics, anecdotes, examples, or quotations. A well-framed and supported claim allows for more robust and meaningful discussions or arguments to occur around it.

https://brainly.in/question/2788063

#SPJ12

Answer:

If you're adding this at the end of an essay i suggest using my sentence and re-stating the main idea with it

Explanation:

Further more we may have such understanding of the subject and the world around us with (State Main Idea) and come to the realization of such matters in place as we now may know.