___ kept the Articles from being ratified for four years. a Selfishness on the b part of Maryland c Miscommunication on the part of Pennsylvania. d Lack of communication due to the war e Jealousy over representation in the Congress

The correct answer is Napoleon’s tax system decreased the inequality between the rich and the poor.

With Napoleon’s reforms, he abolished the distinction between lower and upper classes. Primogeniture, hereditary, nobility and classes privileges were extinguished. Napoleon Civil Code also made private property inviolable. His tax reforms brought more income to the government, he taxed income - because of that he was interested in taxing the rich people - he also taxed goods like wine, salt and tobacco.

Answer:

The Habeas Corpus of 1679 required accused criminals to be examined by a court about its detention and, that way, prevent arbitrary imprisonment.

Explanation:

The Act was passed by the King Charles´ II parliament and it was intended to strengthen the ancient writ of Habeas Corpus. That writ had already been in use for at least five centuries but with the creation of the Act, it was spread throughout the country a regimentation to use the Habeas Corpus.

I hope this answer helps you.

Answer:

1. Federalists wanted a strong central government and mostly resided in the North, while Anti-Federalists wanted strong state governments and mostly resided in the South.

2. Anti-Federalists were opposed to the Constitution because they believed it gave too much power to the federal government and did not sufficiently protect individual rights.

3. This was solved by adding the Bill of Rights.

Explanation:

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists were the first parties of the United States. Federalists believed in a strong central government. They also supported a national bank and friendly relationships with Britain. Most Federalists hailed from cities in the North.

Anti-Federalists (given that name by the opposing party) were the opposite in every way. They wanted a decentralized government, with more power given to the states. They believed the United States was too large for a central government to serve in the best interests of all its people. Anti-Federalists were mostly farmers from the rural South.

Anti-Federalists were against the ratification of the U.S. Constitution because they believed it gave too much power to the federal government. In addition, they did not think it gave enough protection to states and to individuals. They believed that the current Constitution could lead to monarchy or tyranny.

As a compromise, Federalists agreed to add the Bill of Rights if the Anti-Federalists agreed to ratify the Constitution. These first ten amendments gauranteed certain individual rights such as freedom of speech and religion and the right to a trial by jury, among many others. It also said that any powers not explicitly given to the federal government would be given to the states.

Answer:

The answer is free market economy.

Explanation:

The Renaissance and humanism had a profound impact on European education by increasing access to books through the printing press and the establishment of libraries, and by promoting a more personalized approach to learning and critical thinking outside traditional church teachings.

The Renaissance and the advent of humanism significantly transformed educational opportunities across Europe. The invention and spread of the printing press by Johannes Gutenberg, which led to the increased publishing and distribution of books, made knowledge more accessible. Consequently, this technological advancement facilitated the widespread dissemination of classical Greek and Roman texts and new humanist ideas.

Libraries began to appear in major urban centers, becoming centers of learning and helping to broaden education beyond the confines of religious institutions. Humanist philosophy also had an indirect influence on education as it encouraged critical thinking and inquiry outside of traditional church doctrine.

However, the statement that humanism was embraced by the Catholic Church and taught to the lower classes by monks needs clarification. While there were some intersections between humanism and Christianity, particularly in the form of Christian humanism, it is an overstatement to suggest that the church broadly adopted humanist philosophy. Renaissance Humanism propelled individuals to study classical texts alongside Christian teachings, promoting a more personal and intellectual approach to faith.

It's important to correct the misconception that the Renaissance was also known as the 'Dark Ages.' The Renaissance was, in fact, a period of revival and cultural flourishing that moved away from the intellectual stagnation associated with the Dark Ages. It was a time when the embrace of human-centered philosophy caused significant advancements in art, science, and politics, not a regression back to theology and imposed tradition.

Final answer:

The Renaissance and humanism increased educational opportunities in Europe through the printing press, the establishment of libraries, and the promotion of humanist philosophy by the Catholic Church.

Explanation:

The Renaissance and humanism had a significant impact on educational opportunities in Europe during the time. The publishing and distribution of books increased, which made knowledge more widely available. This was made possible by the invention of the printing press by Johannes Gutenberg. Libraries also sprang up in major population centers, further increasing educational opportunities. Additionally, humanist philosophy, which focused on learning outside of Scripture and skepticism towards religious authorities, was embraced by the Catholic Church and taught to the lower classes by monks.

Answer:

the correct is the great society

Explanation:

The correct answer is D) increasing migration to cities by poor families.

The Gilded Age in America saw a significant increase in migration to cities by all different types of Americans, especially poor families. This is due to the fact that new industries/factories were opening up in cities. These factories relied on a significant amount of labor in order to thrive. In this case, many poor families flocked to the city in hopes of obtaining a job where that would help improve their finanical situation.

The Ghana Empire's wealth and expansion were built on trading gold, as evidenced by strategic taxation on trade goods, tributary payments, and control over trade routes. Descriptions from Arab scholars like Al-Bakri confirm the centrality of gold to the empire's economy and its role in the larger trans-Saharan trade network.

The details that support the main idea that Ghana's empire was built on trading gold include the fact that Ghana's leadership began collecting tributary payments and taxes on trade during the consolidation of their empire. By 800 CE, they had established control over trade routes, urban centers, and tributary states. Arab scholars and documents like those of Al-Bakri, an eleventh-century geographer, describe how the Ghanian kings adorned themselves in gold and employed taxes on gold twice, solidifying Ghana's reputation as a wealthy empire. The empire's strength was further bolstered by strong armies funded by their gold-based wealth, as seen through the Ghanian kings' claims of gold nuggets for themselves with only dust for others, showcasing their economic might and political power.

Furthermore, the Ghana Empire played a pivotal role in the trans-Saharan trade, which intensified its wealth and influence in the region. The empire was known for its production of gold and kola nuts, and its participation in the trans-Saharan trade network connected it with the Mediterranean world, Europe, the Near East, southwest Asia, and beyond. The gold from Ghana was significant enough that by the eleventh century, it was used to mint dinars in Morocco on behalf of the Islamic Caliphate, showing the critical role of Ghanian gold in global economics of the time.

The combination of the empire's monopolization of trade, military prowess, the significant tax revenue from gold trade, and the descriptions provided by Islamic scholars all contribute to our understanding of how the empire's wealth from gold was central to its foundation, expansion, and legacy in West Africa.

As for all other options they are factually wrong, as Buddhism spread across India and Siddhartha Gautama was Buddha's own name so these cannot be true, Confucius never spoke of Buddhism as both of them are probably contemporaries.
The correct choice is "C", "Buddhist missionaries spread the new faith, first to Sri Lanka".

During the second century BC Sri Lanka was converted in the time of Mahinda who was the son of the great Asoka (A legendary emperor who helped Buddhism spread across India and beyond)

The correct choice is "C", "Buddhist missionaries spread the new faith, first to Sri Lanka".

Answer:

The Zhou Dynasty.

Explanation:

The Mandate of Heaven concept was used many times during Chinese history. It was used to justify the rule of a King or Emperor by the will of the skies or gods.

Under this doctrine, the ruler of the empire does not need to be born from noble birth. If a ruler was overthrown it was because he/she was unworthy and the gods had decided to favor another person.

Although a lot of dynasties used the doctrine, it was created by the Zhou Dynasty to explain why should they be the legitimate rulers of China instead of the Shang Dynasty.

I hope this answer helps you.

Expectations people have of their government include protection and security, respect for the rule of law, public services, democratic participation, transparency, and accountability.

Expectations that people have of their government can vary, but some common expectations include:

These expectations help shape the relationship between citizens and their government and form the basis for a functioning society.

Electricity and automobiles were significant inventions that transformed urban living at the turn of the century by extending work hours, improving home life, and revolutionizing transportation and urban planning.

Electricity:

Automobiles:

The correct answer is D) He believed the power to buy land did not belong to the federal government but did it anyway because it would double the size of the country and its resources.

The statement that describes how the Louisiana Purchase changed Jefferson’s thinking about the Constitution is "He believed the power to buy land did not belong to the federal government but did it anyway because it would double the size of the country and its resources."

President Thomas Jefferson had ordered Robert Livingston -Minister of France- the purchase of New Orleans and had sent James Monroe to help in the negotiations when they received a counteroffer from the French government: the sale of the entire Louisiana territory.  The United States accepted and paid the French $11,250,000 for 828 square miles. The agreement was signed on May 2, 1803.

Answer:

In Washington's Farewell Address, he urged the nation to avoid forming political parties, avoid creating strong political bonds with foreign countries, and to build trading relationships with other countries.

Explanation:

On July 4, 1776, the United States declared its independence. George Washington, commander in chief of the revolutionary Continental Army in the American War of Independence, was the main architect of the construction of the democratic foundations of the new nation and was soon anointed as the country's first president. At the end of his term, in September 1796, Washington gave the people of the United States a farewell address with recommendations and warnings for their fellow citizens.

The Washington Farewell Speech was an introduction to republican virtue and a severe warning against partisanship, sectoralization and participation in wars abroad, issues that today are not largely respected by the country's politicians.

The President George Washington warned against two things to the people of United States. First was permitting too much trade with other countries and creating strong political bonds with foreign countries.  

Further Explanation:

George Washington dedicated major part of his farewell speech discussing about Foreign Relations. He advocated the policy of good faith towards all nations. He said that United States should keep on working with good faith for other nations keeping their Morality in mind. He stated that united States should avoid long time revelry with other nations. He said that unwanted revelry with other nations may lead to war and can damage Economy of United States. He further stated that alliances of United States can draw them towards war which may be of no profit or no justification for them and not just support any of their allies just because they are allies of United States. He also warned the people of United States of not to be too involved in foreign trade and politics as Europe then was an isolated country and it would not benefit United States in any manner. He also stated that United States should review the permanent allies of the country time to time depending on the situation of the government of the alliance country. He advocated the policy of ‘Free Trade’ with all nations and stated that the free trade policy will benefit economy of United States to the great extent.  

Learn more:

1. What is the best definition of technology? https://brainly.com/question/1474862

2. what would a bill of rights accomplish? https://brainly.com/question/9575649

3. In state court, a losing party can appeal a case if a jury is unable to make a decision. a judge disagrees with a jury’s decision. a precedent does not exist. a higher court agrees to hear it? https://brainly.com/question/2840596

Answer Details:

Grade – High School

Subject – History

Chapter –George Washington

Keywords –George Washington, President, United States, Farewell Speech, Trade, European relations, Foreign Policy, Free trade, Allies.

Answer:

See below

Explanation:

Separate but equal, plessy v ferguson case where a man was part African and sat in the white section of a train, he was arrested and convicted and then appealed his conviction to the supreme court. his lawyers argued that the separation of races violated the 14th amendment equal protection clause. The supreme court saw it differently and claimed separate but equal in public facilities satisfied the amendment.