Answer:
Having more power than others
Explanation:
Moral inequality - Also referred to as political inequality, is based upon artificial foundations. It is formed not by Natural circumstances but by a convention or agreement among consenting men.
The societal differences in power, wealth, status or class are moral inequalities; they entail a single person benefiting at the detriment of another. Whilst a lot of authors have confused the term with the natural state of affairs, it should be noted that this type of inequality is a recent creation.
Moral or political inequality, as defined by Rousseau, is disparity caused by human institutions such as government, societal norms or laws. An example could include laws or policies that discriminate based on factors such as race, gender, or socioeconomic status.
Explanation:According to Jean-Jacques Rousseau, moral or political inequality is a form of disparity that is not natural, but instead established or at least sanctioned by the consent of men. This type of inequality is enforced by institutions such as the government, societal norms, or laws. An example of moral or political inequality could be a law that affords certain rights to one group of people but not to another, such as policies that discriminate based on race, gender, socioeconomic status, or religious beliefs. This form of inequality is not derived from physical or natural differences but from the social or political constructs within a given society.
Learn more about Political Inequality here:https://brainly.com/question/33570764
#SPJ6
At the Tehran Conference in November 1943, despite some tension and unresolved issues, Roosevelt and Stalin established a cordial personal relationship, and the Soviet Union agreed to enter the war in the Pacific after the end of hostilities in Europe.
Answer:
This Question is incomplete, here is the complete question:
True or False? At the Tehran Conference in November 1943, despite some tensions and unresolved issues, Roosevelt and Stalin established a cordial personal relationship, and the Soviet Union agreed to enter the war in the Pacific after the end of hostilities in Europe.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The Tehran Conference (codenamed Eureka) was a meeting for strategic purposes between the big three; Joseph Stalin, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Winston Churchill from 28 November to 1 December 1943, following the Anglo-Soviet Invasion of Iran. The strategic conference was held in the Soviet Union's embassy in Tehran, Iran. It was the initial of the World War II conferences of the "Big Three" Allied leaders comprising of the Soviet Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom.
Match each description with the item below. Group of answer choices Andrew Carnegie Eugene V. Debs Henry Clay Frick Reverend Josiah Strong Joe Hill Denis Kearney J. Pierpont Morgan Terence V. Powderly John D. Rockefeller Alvah Roebuck
Answer:
Andrew Carnegie; he wrote a book called "The Gospel of Wealth"
Eugene V. Debs; he was a presidential candidate of the Socialist Party of America.
Henry Clay Frick; he was president of the Homestead Steel Works.
Reverend Josiah Strong: he was one of America's leading religious and social voices in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.
Joe Hill; he was a labor organizer executed for murder
Denis Kearney; he organized Workingman's Party of California
J. Pierpont Morgan; he developed the steel industry into the United States Steel Corporation
Terence V. Powderly; he inspired and created the knights of labor
John D. Rockefeller; Founder of standard oil
Alvah Roebuck; he founded the Sears, Roebuck and Company mail order business,
Explanation:
To match each description with the correct individual from the provided list, we need to consider the historical significance and contributions of each person.
Here are the matches:
1. Andrew Carnegie - An industrialist who made his fortune in the steel industry and later became a philanthropist, known for his libraries and foundations.
2. Eugene V. Debs - A labor leader and socialist activist who ran for president five times as the Socialist Party candidate.
3. Henry Clay Frick - A steel magnate and partner of Andrew Carnegie, known for his role in the Homestead Strike and for his art collection.
4. Reverend Josiah Strong - A Protestant clergyman and writer who advocated for the Social Gospel movement, which aimed to apply Christian ethics to social problems.
5. Joe Hill - A labor activist and songwriter for the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), executed on questionable murder charges.
6. Denis Kearney - A labor leader and populist who founded the Workingmen's Party of California and was known for his anti-Chinese rhetoric.
7. J. Pierpont Morgan - A financier and banker who dominated corporate finance and industrial consolidation during his time.
8. Terence V. Powderly - A leader of the Knights of Labor, the largest labor union of the 19th century, which sought to unite all workers regardless of skill level.
9. John D. Rockefeller - An oil magnate who founded Standard Oil and became the world's first billionaire through monopolistic practices.
10. Alvah Roebuck - A businessman who co-founded Sears, Roebuck and Company, which revolutionized the mail-order business.
These matches are based on the historical roles and contributions of each individual. Andrew Carnegie is known for his role in the steel industry and philanthropy; Eugene V. Debs for his socialist activism and presidential campaigns; Henry Clay Frick for his partnership with Carnegie and his handling of labor disputes; Reverend Josiah Strong for his advocacy of the Social Gospel; Joe Hill for his labor activism and songwriting; Denis Kearney for his populist and anti-Chinese labor activism; J. Pierpont Morgan for his influence in finance and industry; Terence V. Powderly for his leadership in the labor movement; John D. Rockefeller for his dominance in the oil industry; and Alvah Roebuck for his role in the development of the mail-order business.
The names of the kings in the answer choices are given alphabetically. The correct answers will reflect their reigns chronologically. After more than a century of the kingdom of Israel under , , and , the kingdom was divided between in the south, and in the north.
Answer:
After more than a century of the kingdom of Israel under Saul, David, and Solomon, the kingdom was divided between Rehoboam in the south, and Jeroboam in the north.
Explanation:
During the Old Testament times, the kingdom of Israel was ruled by numerous kings that the Lord appointed. But often at times being passed from one to another among the same family, the kings also were removed by the Lord if they disobeyed or behaved against his will.
In those periods, the people of Israel were under the guidance of the priests who passed on the directives from God. But with the death of the prophet Eli and the aging Samuel, Israel demanded to be given a king to rule and lead them in wars. So, God directed prophet Samuel to anoint Saul as king of Israel (1 Samuel 10). After him came David, son of Jesse (1 Samuel 16), succeeded by his son Solomon (1 Kings 1:28- 36). After Solomon drifted away from God, the kingdom of Israel was divided into two, the south ruled by Rehoboam(1 Kings 14:21) and the North ruled by Jeroboam (1 Kings 11: 26- 40).
Final answer:
The period of history in question is the era of the united and divided monarchy in ancient Israel. Chronologically, the kings who ruled were Saul, David, and Solomon, and following Solomon's death, the kingdom was divided into Israel in the north and Judah in the south. The events follow a sequence where the united monarchy under these kings led to a divided monarchy with distinct rulers in each region.
Explanation:
The historical period that saw the transition from the united monarchy to the divided kingdoms in ancient Israel is significant in understanding the lineage of kings. After the reigns of Saul, David, and Solomon, Israel experienced significant changes. The answer to the student's question involves identifying the sequence in which these kings ruled, which is Saul, David, and Solomon chronologically, and then acknowledging the division of the kingdom into Israel in the north and Judah in the south. It is essential to note that after King Solomon’s death, his kingdom was divided, with Israel being led by a series of dynasties that often conflicted with Judah to the south, which maintained the Davidic line of kings.
The transition marks an important shift from a unified monarchy into two separate kingdoms, both of which had their own distinct trajectories. The kingdom of Judah, with Jerusalem as its capital, continued the Davidic dynasty, whereas the kingdom of Israel, with Samaria as its capital, went through a series of different rulers and was often at odds with Judah.
In 1923, the Supreme Court declared that "white" was not a scientific concept at all, but part of "common speech, to be interpreted with the understanding of the common man," which scholars later called the "social construction" of race. A. True B. False
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Although traditionally it was believed that race is a biological construct which was used to justify the superiority of the people belonging to one race over others. But modern researches proved that no genes are common in every white or black population. Therefore race is socially constructed to manipulate or control the power in society.
Final answer:
The Supreme Court did not declare in 1923 that 'white' is not a scientific concept. Instead, race is widely regarded as a social construct by today's scholars and scientists. Societal examples, such as Susie Guillory Phipps' case, exemplify how racial categories are based on social and cultural definitions instead of biological facts.
Explanation:
The statement that in 1923, the Supreme Court declared 'white' was not a scientific concept but part of 'common speech, to be interpreted with the understanding of the common man,' is False. Scholarly consensus now recognizes that race is a social construct, meaning it has no basis in natural or biological facts but is an artificial distinction created by humans.
Historical litigation over racial identity, such as the case of Susie Guillory Phipps in the early 1980s, highlights the fluid and socially constructed nature of race. Despite only having one Black ancestor 150 years prior, Phipps was officially classified as Black due to Louisiana's 'one-drop rule.' This and many other examples underscore the idea that racial categories like 'white' and 'black' are socially and culturally defined, not biologically.
Moreover, anthropologists and social scientists argue that racial labels do not reflect objective or natural divisions, as there are no distinct biological human races. Instead, race is a concept that reflects subjectively defined social and cultural categories, which might include categories such as 'American' and 'African' that are real but not rooted in biology. The science of race, especially after the Human Genome Project, has led to further discussions on the relevance of race in various domains without relying on it for discriminatory purposes.
Which of the following is an example of a difference between Northern and
Southern culture?
Answer:
ITS D!!
Explanation:
APEXX
Both Northern and Southern culture in the US have their roots in historical economic bases: the industrial North versus the agrarian South. This has shaped many cultural differences, from social structures and values, to food and music. However, these are generalizations and there is significant diversity within each region.
Explanation:There are numerous differences between Northern and Southern culture in the United States, stemming from the country's historical, geographic, and social developments. One significant difference is their historical economic bases. The North developed an industrial economy based on factories and manufacturing, while the South was primarily agrarian with an economy based on plantation farming. This industrial vs agrarian economic divide heavily influenced cultural differences between the regions, impacting everything from social structures and values to food and music.
For instance, Southern culture has been characterized by a greater emphasis on traditional social hierarchies, courtesy norms, and agricultural practices. Northern culture, influenced by its industrial roots, typically places value on efficiency, innovation, and urban lifestyles.
However, it's important to remember that these are generalizations and there is a significant amount of diversity within each region. Each has unique cultural expressions, traditions, and experiences that continue to evolve and shape regional identities.
Learn more about Cultural Differences here:https://brainly.com/question/30163799
#SPJ2
The geopolitical setting of which countries can be explained by its membership in the warsaw pact during the cold war and its location along the european shatterbelt?
Answer:
The correct answer is option 2, Bulgaria.
Explanation:
As the complete question is not given, the complete question with the answer choices is attached herewith.
The options are
FranceBulgariaItalySwitzerlandBelgiumThe Soviet Union and seven of its European satellites sign a treaty establishing the Warsaw Pact, a mutual defense organization that put the Soviets in command of the armed forces of the member states.
The Warsaw Pact, so named because the treaty was signed in Warsaw, included the Soviet Union, Albania, Poland, Romania, Hungary, East Germany, Czechoslovakia, and Bulgaria as members.
The geopolitical setting of countries during the Cold War can be explained by their membership in the Warsaw Pact and their location along the European Shelterbelt.
Explanation:The geopolitical setting of countries during the Cold War can be explained by their membership in the Warsaw Pact and their location along the European Shelterbelt. The Warsaw Pact was a military alliance formed by the Soviet Union and its satellite states in response to NATO. This alliance divided Europe into two opposing camps, the Western Bloc led by the United States and the Eastern Bloc led by the Soviet Union.
The Eastern Bloc countries, which included countries like Poland, Hungary, and Czechoslovakia, were under Soviet influence and had communist governments. They were part of the Warsaw Pact and aligned with the Soviet Union's political and military objectives. The Warsaw Pact provided a security blanket for these countries and ensured their loyalty to the Soviet Union.
The European Shatterbelt refers to the region in Central and Eastern Europe that became a battleground between the Western Bloc and the Eastern Bloc during the Cold War. This region, including countries like Germany, Poland, and Czechoslovakia, was strategically significant due to its location between the two blocs. It experienced political and military tensions as the two superpowers vied for influence and control.
Paraguay's primary economic influence was farming industry. In two to three sentences compare the historic farming economy of Paraguay with more recent history
Answer:
The economy of Paraguay largely depended in agricultural production.
Explanation:
In the past, interest in agriculture began to grow since the early 1970s and 1980s. The main production of the country based on cotton and soybean. Land under cultivation began to expand from 7.5 % in the 1970s to around 3.5 % in the late 1980s.
In modern times, Paraguay giving more importance to agriculture production along with forestry, fishing, and in the industrial sector where workers work in industries.
Colonies (select all that apply, there are one to four possible correct answers):
Were often restructured by the dominant country to produce one particular crop or mineral resource
Are today the source of much of the portfolio investment in MDCs
Were finally abolished after WWI by President Woodrow Wilson
Were generally drained of commodities, human capital, and/or money
Answer: Were often restructured by the dominant country to produce one particular crop or mineral resource
Were generally drained of commodities, human capital, and/or money
Explanation: Colonies may be defined as an area or territory subjected to a ruling power or under the complete political control or rulership. Colonies are also separated from the parent territory of the ruling power.
Under the control of the ruling state, Colonies are restructured and empowered to produce one particular crop or mineral resources.
Most Colonies are only empowered to labor and produce resources required by the parent nation, they are devoid of capital, social or welfare commodities and capital. Amenities observed in most Colonies are usually those required by the parent nation to aid production and facilitate trading.
Final answer:
Colonies were restructured to produce specific crops or resources and were exploited for their commodities, human capital, and money. This formed the basis for current international trade patterns and the persistent economic challenges faced by postcolonial countries, known as neo-colonialism.
Explanation:
Colonies were structured in several ways under colonial rule, primarily to benefit the controlling countries economically. Here are factual statements regarding the nature of colonial economies:
Colonies were often restructured by the dominant country to produce one particular crop or mineral resource. This can be observed in the establishment of export monocultures, such as gold and diamonds in South Africa, corn in Mexico, and cotton, tea, peanuts, and sugarcane in India. These practices laid the foundation for modern international trade and were part of the larger economic motive behind colonialism, which was to extract raw materials to support the industrial economies of Europe.Colonies were generally drained of commodities, human capital, and/or money. This exploitation is evident in the fact that many indigenous farmers lost their land to commercial agricultural production, and local populations were forced into a capitalist economic system that benefited the colonial masters at the expense of the colonized societies.
However, the statements that colonies are today the source of much of the portfolio investment in More Developed Countries (MDCs) and that they were finally abolished after WWI by President Woodrow Wilson are inaccurate. While many colonies gained independence in the mid-20th century, the legacy of colonialism persists in the form of neo-colonialism, where former colonies continue to be economically dependent on more developed countries through the export of raw materials and import of manufactured goods.
Canada has 10 provinces and _____ territories
A.
3
B.
4
C.
6
D.
Answer:
The answer is A.3
Explanation:
The territories are Northwest Territories, Nunavut and Yukon.
Canada is composed of 10 provinces and 3 territories. The provinces include highly populated areas like Ontario and Quebec, with Ontario having the largest population. Physical geography significantly influences Canada's economic activities and where people live.
Explanation:Canada has 10 provinces and 3 territories. The territories are the Yukon, Northwest Territories, and Nunavut. These territories, alongside the provinces, make up the nation's political divisions. Understanding the political geography of Canada is essential in fields such as geography and social studies.
Most Canadians live in provinces like Ontario and Quebec due to factors such as economic opportunities and the more temperate climate. Ontario has the largest population, with about 39 percent of Canadians residing there. Quebec is home to the largest French-speaking population in Canada, illustrating the bilingual nature of the country.
Physical geography, such as the presence of the Rocky Mountains in British Columbia and the Canadian Prairies, plays a significant role in the economic activities and population distribution in Canada.
Read this passage:
An eastern European dictatorship has invaded and
occupied a neighboring country. The president of the
United States tries to pressure the dictatorship to end its
occupation by banning the country from trading with U.S.
companies. U.S. allies follow the same policy, preventing
the dictatorship from importing a wide range of goods. The
country eventually gives in and ends the occupation.
The use of which foreign policy tool is described in the passage?
O
A. Humanitarian aid
O
B. Sanctions
O
C. Diplomacy
O
D. Military intervention
Answer:B sanctions
Explanation:
Based on the actions of the United States, the foreign policy tool used here was B. Sanctions.
What foreign policy tool was used?Sanctions refer to a foreign policy tool where a nation or international organization, limits economic activities done by another nation.
This was the goal of the United States in this passage as they prevented economic activity with the eastern European dictatorship.
Find out more on sanctions at https://brainly.com/question/1359553.
#SPJ2
What changes occurred in american trade with the allies and the central powers between 1914 and 1916?
Which letter on the map indicates the location of Germany?
A
B
C
D
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Germany is near France in Europe.
The letter C on the map indicates the location of Germany on the map.
Germany is a country situated in the heart of Europe. It is bordered by nine countries: Denmark to the north, Poland and the Czech Republic to the east, Austria and Switzerland to the south, France to the west, Luxembourg, Belgium, and the Netherlands to the west and northwest. Its central location within the continent has historically made it a crucial player in European politics and economics.
Germany's geographical position has also contributed to its cultural diversity, as it has been influenced by neighboring countries and regions. Its central location has made it a crossroads for trade, commerce, and cultural exchange throughout history. Today, Germany is known for its rich cultural heritage, strong economy, and pivotal role in the European Union, thanks in part to its strategic position in the heart of Europe.
To know more about Germany, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/22303536
#SPJ3
Great Britain had many colonies in North America. What was the purpose of these colonies according to the ideas of mercantilism?
A. to trade with countries other than Great Britain
B. to produce raw materials for Great Britain
C. to increase wealth for colonial merchants
Answer: The answer is B. The colonies would produce raw materials for Great Britain, then Great Britain would later trade those materials with other countries
Answer:
the answer is B:
Explanation:
B.to produce raw materials for Great Britian
Consider each of the situations below. Decide if each one is a legitimate or illegitimate use of power, and explain each of your decisions.
a.A government that is elected by the people raises taxes.
b.A government court sentences someone to death.
c.An assassin kills an elected leader.
d.A group of military officers takes over the government of a country.
Answer:
A and B are legitimate. C and D are illegitimate
Explanation:
A. "A government that is elected by the people raises taxes." This is perfectly legal and therefore it is legitimate. Though the people may not like it.
B. "A government court sentences someone to death." If say, a murder trial goes to the Supreme Court and the judge sentences the murder to death, as long as it is a fair trial then this is legal and is legitimate.
C. "An assassin kills an elected leader." This is murder and therefore no matter the morality behind the assassination it can not be legitimate.
D: "A group of military officers takes over the government of a country." Taking over a government by force is illegal and therefore this is illegitimate
Hope this helps =)
How did the pri fulfill some goals of the mexican revolution but not others?
Answer:
It accommodated many groups in Mexican society, including business and military leaders, peasants, and while they were keeping real power in their own hands.
Explanation: The PRI was effective in implementing many economic and social reforms in Mexico, but not through liberal democracy. It redistributed land to peasants, supported labor unions, built an education system open to all Mexicans, and nationalized oil. On the other hand, it instituted essentially a single-party system and cracked down on all political opposition.
What was the title of the man who is the first of the two names in the name of the 1901 treaty that nullified the clayton-bulwer treaty?
Answer:
The title of John Middleton Clayton was Lawyer
Explanation:
John Middleton Clayton was an American Lawyer that was one of the persons responsable for "The Clayton–Bulwer Treaty" .
This treaty was negotiated in 1850 between US and Great Britain, John Clayton negotiate with Sir Henry Lytton Bulwer from Great Britain three main provisions:
neither nation would build such a canal without the consent and cooperation of the other neither would fortify or found new colonies in the region; when a canal was builtboth powers would guarantee that it would be available on a neutral basis for all shipping.The canal was never built but the treaty was in effect until 1901.
The title of the man who is the first of the two names in the 1901 treaty that nullified the Clayton-Bulwer Treaty is Secretary of State. This treaty is known as the Hay-Pauncefote Treaty. It was represented by U.S. Secretary of State John Hay and British Ambassador Lord Julian Pauncefote.
The title of the man is Secretary of State.
The Hay-Pauncefote Treaty
The 1901 treaty that nullified the Clayton-Bulwer Treaty is known as the Hay-Pauncefote Treaty.
The United States Secretary of State, John Hay, represented the United States.The British Ambassador, Lord Julian Pauncefote, represented the United Kingdom.The Hay-Pauncefote Treaty was crucial in paving the way for the construction of the Panama Canal by the United States, by removing the restrictions imposed by the earlier Clayton-Bulwer Treaty, which required joint control over any Central American canal project.
Confederate authorities eventually became so desperate to make up for manpower shortages that they made it legal to arm slaves and offer them their freedom in exchange for enlisting and defending the Confederacy. The measure became law in March 1865.1. True2. False
Answer:
True .
Explanation:
Desperately fighting to resist the attacks of the Northern army that was occupying large areas of the South , the Confederacy approved the recruitment of black slaves into its ranks on March 13, 1865. They were promised freedom. Several thousands of black slaves were recruited by the Confederates, but their heavily outnumbered forces could not match the power of the Union armies, in which 200,000 thousands black men were serving.
To what extent was the reversal of neutrality in the best interest of the United States?
Answer: Neutrality was aimed at preventing expenses and war casualties that did not translate to the benefit of the U.S. and its citizens
Explanation: After World War I, the United States passed the Neutrality Act to prevent the U.S. from getting involved in any war. The U.S. regretted its involvement in World War I and when it was clear that there would be another war in Europe, Roosevelt pushed for the passing of the Neutrality Acts. The Acts banned the sales of arms to any country involved in a war.
However, the Acts were later amended so as to be able to help countries fighting fascism. When Pearl Habor was bombed, America could no longer avoid the war. It was necessary but it was expensive for the nation and its citizens.
The reversal of neutrality in World War I was partially in the best interest of the United States, as it could have bolstered the morale of Britain and France and provided them with essential resources for the war effort. However, there were also arguments against US intervention.
Explanation:The reversal of neutrality in World War I was partially in the best interest of the United States. While many Americans were initially reluctant to enter the war due to the horrors of trench warfare and the distance from Europe, there were strategic concerns that favored US entry on the side of Britain and France. The sinking of US ships and the Zimmerman Telegram also played a role in changing public opinion towards intervention.
The United States' entry into the war could have bolstered the morale of Britain and France, who were facing significant challenges from Germany and the possibility of a Socialist revolution in Russia. Additionally, American businesses were trading with Britain and France, providing them with essential resources for the war effort. On the other hand, there were also arguments against US intervention, as some feared the potential consequences and loss of American lives.
Stalin’s refused to set up a police state in the Soviet Union true or false.
Answer: true
Explanation: stalin did refures .
What process in the mid to late nineteenth century most directly led to situations in which non-Western countries found it very difficult to protect their indigenous industries from Western competition?
Answer:
Industrial Revolution.
Explanation:
Industrial Revolution process in the mid to late nineteenth century most directly led to situations in which non-Western countries found it very difficult to protect their indigenous industries from Western competition.
Which group was created in late 1865 to resist reconstruction efforts in the south?
Answer:
Ku Klux Klan
Explanation:
After the American Civil War
(12 Apr 1861 – 9 Apr 1865), there was a Reconstruction (between 1865-1877) which was implemented through the Bureau of Refugees, Freedmen and Abandoned Lands. The Bureau was established in 1865 by Congress to help millions of former black slaves and poor whites in the South.
After the passage of the Reconstruction Act of 1867, newly enfranchised blacks gained a voice in government for the first time in American history.
However the Ku Klux Klan, a white supremacist group emerged to suppress and victimize newly freed slaves thereby resisting reconstruction efforts in the Southern part of the country.
Answer:
Answer is Ku Klux Klan.
Refer below for the explanation.
Explanation:
Therefore,
The Ku Klux Klan called the KKK or the Klan whose primary target is African Americans is an American white supremacist hate group.
The GDP of the United States in 2010 was about . The United States is a country. The GDP of the United States is most other countries in the world.
Answer:
The GDP of the United States in 2010 was about 14.96 trillion USD.
The United States is a developed country.
The GDP of the United States is greater than most of the countries of the world.
Explanation:
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the value of all finished goods and services made within a country during a specific period in terms of money. GDP provides an economic overview of a country, and is used to estimate the size of an economy and growth rate.
From the World bank data of GDP, the GDP of USA is found to be 14.96 trillion USD in 2010. As USA is in developed countries so the second blank is filled. Also the GDP of USA was greater than almost all the countries around the globe.
The U.S. has the largest GDP in the world, and its GDP per capita calculation reveals that its economy is not only large due to the population size but also reflects high productivity and standard of living.
Explanation:The question you've asked relates to the comparison of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the United States with other countries in the world. As of the fourth quarter of 2016, the U.S. had an impressive annual GDP of $18.9 trillion, indicating a significant recovery from the 2008-2009 recession. This recovery has been gradual but shows improvement in the economy.
To understand whether the U.S. economy is larger due to its population size or because of higher productivity per person, we look at the GDP per capita, which is calculated by dividing the GDP by the population. Despite being the third most populous country, the U.S. has the largest GDP, which reflects not only the sheer number of people but also the country's high productivity per person, suggesting a higher standard of living.
By analyzing economic indicators such as GDP per capita, we get a better sense of a country's economic health and standard of living. These indicators serve as a foundation for understanding other aspects of the economy, like unemployment, inflation, and interest rates.
Learn more about GDP Comparison here:https://brainly.com/question/33575735
#SPJ3
What was the result of the massacre that took place in China in April 1927?
1. a civil war that lasted two decades
2. a return to a democratic government
3. the execution of the country’s monarch
4. the banishment of the country’s warlords
Answer: 1. A civil war that lasted two decades
Explanation:
The dropping of the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II sparked the end of the war but also sparked an ongoing arms race throughout the world. The bomb itself killed more than 100,000 civilians in Japan. Was the dropping of the atomic bomb an ethical decision
Answer:yes
Explanation:people wanted it
The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki caused immense destruction and loss of life, largely among civilians, but also may have hastened the end of World War II. This event sparked the nuclear arms race during the Cold War, as countries sought to develop their own nuclear weapons. The question of the bombings' ethics remains controversial.
Explanation:The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945, at the end of World War II, marked a serious turning point not only in the war but also in human history. The destruction they caused both directly, through the immediate blast, and indirectly, through residual radiation, led to an estimated 200,000 fatalities, primarily civilians. Furthermore, there were long-term ailments resulting from exposure to radiation.
On the ethical level, this question lies in the area of controversy. On one side, some argue that the bombings were necessary to hasten the end of World War II and save lives on the Allied side that would have been lost in continued combat. The Allies had been warning the Axis that a significant and unavoidable bombardment would occur if they didn't surrender. Despite these warnings, Japan ostensibly ignored the possible consequences. On the other hand, the destruction and loss of life caused by the bombs were immense and primarily affected civilians, leading many to argue that these bombings were unethical.
Furthermore, these bombings sparked the nuclear arms race during the Cold War, as nations recognized the devastating power of such weapons and sought to develop their own. This introduced a new era of geopolitical relations based on nuclear deterrence, causing a constant threat of nuclear war.
Learn more about Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki here:https://brainly.com/question/27441304
#SPJ12
The table below shows the main features of the Treaty of Versailles:
Provisions of the Treaty of Versailles
− Restrictions on the size of the German military
− Occupation of German territory by the Allies
− Payment of war reparations by Germany
− ???
Which phrase completes the table?
1) Division of Germany split two nations
2) Establishment of the League of Nations
3) Transfer of German colonies to the United States
4) Ban on the use of submarines and chemical weapons
Answer:
it is the 4th option
Explanation:
america had originally gotten invilved in worl war one because germany began sinking U.S ships. they decided to ban the use of chemical weapons because soldires who came in contact with for example the poison gas bomb were blinded, burned, and suffocated. those who survived it had to live with chronic medical conditions for the rest of their lives.
Which of these would be an example of an implied power of Congress?
A)
borrowing money
B)
establishing copyright laws
C)
establishing a minimum wage
D)raising and supporting a Navy
Final answer:
An example of an implied power of Congress is establishing a minimum wage. Implied powers allow Congress to enact necessary laws that are not expressly stated in the Constitution but support its enumerated powers, such as regulating commerce.
Explanation:
The question is asking for an example of an implied power of Congress. Implied powers are not expressly stated in the U.S. Constitution, but are derived from the necessary and proper clause (often referred to as the "elastic clause"). This allows Congress to enact laws that are necessary and proper for carrying out its enumerated powers. Given the options provided:
The power to regulate the sale of tobacco in the statesThe power to increase taxes on the wealthiest one percentThe power to put the president on trial for high crimesThe power to override a presidential vetoOption C, the power to establish a minimum wage, is an example of an implied power of Congress. While the Constitution does not explicitly mention the regulation of labor standards, Congress has utilized its implied powers to establish laws concerning wages, which falls under the larger umbrella of regulating commerce and ensuring the general welfare of the citizens.
The discovery of Tutankhamun’s tomb was one of the greatest archaeological discoveries in the 20th century. The finding by the English archaeologist Howard Carter was significant because:______.
Answer:
Because it gives record on what an Egyptian tomb looks like.
Explanation:
The tomb was significant because it let archaeologists record what an Egyptian king's tomb looked like and learn more about ancient Egypt. One of King Tutankhamen's Nobles is now in Rochester, New York. This relief depicts Maya, an important official during the reign of three pharaohs: Tutankhamen, Ay, and Horemhab.
The First Amendment to the Constitution : _.A. Kept governments from forcing someone to give testimony prejudicial to their legal rights. B. Prevents unreasonable search or seizure of a person or their property. C. Protected citizens against congressional interference with freedom of religion, speech, the press, or assembly. D. Stated that all rights not delegated to the central government were retained by the states or the people.
Answer:
The answer is C.
Explanation: The first amendment of the United States stated that: The First Amendment to the United States Constitution prevents the government from making laws which regulate an establishment of religion, prohibit the free exercise of religion, or abridge the freedom
Thus, the answer is C.
19)
The different colors on the map MOST LIKELY represent
A) imperialist countries.
B) Allied and Axis powers.
C) differences in economic practices.
D) countries affected by the Depression.
Answer:
c) differences in economic practices.
Explanation:
just trust me broski
Several forensic anthropologists have dealt with the aftermath of Argentina’s "Dirty War" (1970s and 1980s) during which many people disappeared. Which of the following techniques would be inappropriate for anthropologists to use in attempting to find and identify these individuals?a) creating a glossary of the local language, using methods of linguistic anthropologyb) excavating mass graves, using archaeological techniquesc) talking to locals who were alive at the time, using ethnographic methods of cultural anthropologyd) studying skeletons, using methods of physical anthropology
Answer:
All of them except B and D that clearly belong to Forensic anthropology
Explanation:
Forensic science is the application of science to criminal and civil laws. Antropology is the study of the relationship of human beings with their surrounding.
A is not forensic B is an almost perfect definition of etnographic field work of antropologists. Almost because talking to locals who were alive doesn´t make sense.