In which step of the scientific method is information obtained through the senses?

Explanation:

There are some conventions while solving the problems based on mirrors. All parameters are taken like x-y coordinate system.

All the measurements are done from the optical centre of the mirror.

[tex]d_i[/tex] is the image distance

[tex]d_o[/tex] is the object distance

[tex]-d_i[/tex] is the image distance which is formed behind the mirror.

[tex]-d_o[/tex] is the object distance when an object is placed behind the mirror.

So, [tex]-d_i[/tex] shows the image that is located behind the mirror. Hence, this is the required solution.

Answer: B) Velocity

Explanation:

Velocity is a vector quantity. Velocities have both magnitude and direction.

Answer:B. Velocity

Explanation:

(a) [tex]24.6 m/s^2[/tex]

At a distance r=R from the centre of the planet, there is no effect due to the outer shell: so, the gravitational field strength at r=R is only determined by the gravity produced by the core of the planet.

So, the strength of the gravitational field is given by

[tex]g= \frac{GM}{R^2}[/tex]

where

G is the gravitational constant

M = 6.24 × 10^24 kg is the mass of the core of the planet

R = 4.11 × 10^6 m is the radius of the core

Substituting into the equation, we find

[tex]g= \frac{(6.67\cdot 10^{-11})(6.24\cdot 10^{24} kg)}{(4.11\cdot 10^6 m)^2}=24.6 m/s^2[/tex]

(b) [tex]13.7 m/s^2[/tex]

at distance r=3R from the centre, the particle feels the effect of gravity due to both the core of the planet and the outer shell between R and 2R.

So, we have to consider the total mass that exerts the gravitational attraction at r=3R, which is the sum of the mass of the core (M) and the mass of the shell (4M):

M' = M + 4M = 5M

Therefore, the gravitational acceleration at r=3R will be

[tex]g'= \frac{G(5M)}{(3R)^2}=\frac{5}{9}\frac{GM}{R^2} = \frac{5}{9}g[/tex]

And susbstituting

g = 24.6 m/s^2

found in the previous part, we find

[tex]g' = \frac{5}{9} (24.6 m/s^2)=13.7 m/s^2[/tex]

The gravitational acceleration at point R is approximately 9.85 m/s².  the gravitational acceleration at point 3R is approximately 1.09 m/s².

The formula for gravitational acceleration:

g = (G × M) / r²

where:

g is the gravitational acceleration,

G is the gravitational constant,

M is the mass of the planet,

and r is the distance from the center of the planet.

Given:

M = 6.24 × 10²⁴ kg

R = 4.11 × 10⁶ m

(a) At point R:

g = (G × M) / R²

g = (6.674 × 10⁻¹¹ × 6.24 × 10²⁴) / (4.11 × 10⁶)²

g = 9.85 m/s²

Therefore, the gravitational acceleration at point R is approximately 9.85 m/s².

(b) At point 3R:

g = (G × M) / (3R)²

g = (6.674 × 10⁻¹¹ × 6.24 × 10²⁴) / (3 × 4.11 × 10⁶)²

g = 1.09 m/s²

Therefore, the gravitational acceleration at point 3R is approximately 1.09 m/s².

To know more about the gravitational acceleration:

https://brainly.com/question/28556238

#SPJ6

The atomic nuclei of almost all elements consist of protons and neutrons.

The nucleus of an atom has very small dimensions. However, it occupies its central part and concentrates more than 99% of its total mass.

It is in the nucleus that the protons (positive charge) and neutrons (neutral charge) are found.

Ok so we know that electric power is:

[tex]P=UI=I^2R[/tex]

If we express resistance.

[tex]R=\dfrac{P}{I^2}[/tex]

Now if you have 100W of power you will probably get a bigger resistance than with 40W of power.

However here it says that the resistance of 40W bulb is bigger than 100W bulb. Which means the statement is incorrect.

Hope this helps.

r3t40

Explanation:

A force that leads to movement of an object is known as work.

The energy present in an object due to its position in a gravitational field is known as gravitational potential energy.

Kinetic energy is the energy obtained by an object due to its motion.

For example, when Jerome is swinging on a rope then there occurs movement in the swing due to which the swing has kinetic energy.

Since, a force has been applied on the swing to make it move. Hence, a work is also done.

Therefore, we can conclude that if Jerome is swinging on a rope and transferring energy from gravitational potential energy to kinetic energy, work is being done.

Answer:

the answer is B ( work )

Explanation:

A.) compression

B.) work

C.) radiation

D.) energy creation

Answer: The electron moves slower than the speed of light

Explanation:

The de Broglie wavelength [tex]\lambda[/tex] is given by the following formula:

[tex]\lambda=\frac{h}{p}[/tex] (1)

Where:

[tex]h=6.626(10)^{-34}\frac{m^{2}kg}{s}[/tex] is the Planck constant

[tex]p[/tex] is the momentum of the atom, which is given by:

[tex]p=m_{e}v[/tex] (2)

Where:

[tex]m_{e}=9.11(10)^{-28}g=9.11(10)^{-31}kg[/tex] is the mass of the electron

[tex]v[/tex] is the velocity of the electron  (the value we want to find)

Substituting (2) in (1):

[tex]\lambda=\frac{h}{m_{e}v}[/tex] (3)

Finding [tex]v[/tex] :

[tex]v=\frac{h}{m_{e}\lambda}[/tex] (4)

[tex]v=\frac{6.626(10)^{-34}\frac{m^{2}kg}{s}}{(9.11(10)^{-31}kg)(3.31(10)^{-10}m/s)}[/tex] (5)

Finally:

[tex]v=2.197(10)^{6} m/s[/tex]>>> This is the velocity of the electron, which compared to the [tex]v=3(10)^{8} m/s[/tex] of the light is quite slower.

The electron's speed relative to the speed of light is calculated using the de Broglie wavelength formula, which determines the velocity of the electron. The formula is rearranged to solve for velocity and the given details are inserted into the formula to obtain the answer.

The electron's speed can be determined in relation to the speed of light using the de Broglie wavelength formula, which states that an electron's wavelength equals Planck's constant (6.63 x 10^-34 m^2 kg/s) divided by the electron's momentum. Momentum is the product of mass and velocity. The speed of the electron is then calculated by rearranging the formula to solve for velocity.

Given:
de Broglie wavelength, λ = 3.31×10−10 m
Mass of electron, m = 9.11x10^-31 kg
Planck's constant, h = 6.63 x 10^-34 m^2 kg/s
Speed of light, c = 3.00×10^8 m/s

Calculation:
Velocity of the electron, v = h / (m * λ)
The velocity of the electron relative to the speed of light is therefore v/c.

https://brainly.com/question/34225181

#SPJ12

Answer:

Positrons are spontaneously emitted from the nuclei of potassium -37

Explanation:

Answer: potassium 37

Explanation:

Ok so we are given the radius of 7cm and time of 5 seconds.

From the data we got we can calculate speed, frequency, perimeter and area of the semicircle.

Let's start with perimeter.

We know that perimeter of circle is [tex]2\pi r[/tex] so the perimeter of semicircle is [tex]\dfrac{2\pi r}{2}[/tex] or simply [tex]\pi r[/tex]

So the perimeter is equal to:

[tex]\pi r=\pi\cdot7\approx\boxed{22cm}[/tex]

So this is the length of a curve or let's say the distance.

Now let's look at the linear speed [tex]s=\dfrac{d}{t}[/tex] where d is distance and t time.

We know the distance and we know the time.

So let's calculate it.

[tex]s=\dfrac{d}{t}=\dfrac{22}{5}=\boxed{4.4\dfrac{cm}{s}}[/tex]

Hope this helps.

r3t40

The wavelength of an electromagnetic wave with a frequency of 8 ⋅ 10^14 Hz and speed of 3 ⋅ 10^8 m/s, calculated using the formula λ = V / F, is approximately 3.75 ⋅ 10^-7 meters.

To find the wavelength of an electromagnetic wave with a known frequency and speed, you can use the formula λ = V / F, where λ is the wavelength, V the speed of light, and F the frequency of the wave

Given that V (the speed of light) = 3 ⋅ 10^8 m/s and the frequency (F) = 8 ⋅ 10^14 Hz, substituting these values into the formula gives: λ = (3 ⋅ 10^8 m/s) / (8 ⋅ 10^14 Hz) .

Solving this equation, we find that the wavelength (λ) of the electromagnetic wave is approximately 3.75 ⋅ 10^-7 meters.

https://brainly.com/question/14316836

#SPJ3

Answer:

Because of the presence of air resistance

Explanation:

When an object is in free fall, ideally there is only one force acting on it:

- The force of gravity, W = mg, that pushes the object downward (m= mass of the object, g = acceleration of gravity)

However, this is true only in absence of air (so, in a vacuum). When air is present, it exerts a frictional force on the object (called air resistance) with upward direction (opposite to the motion of free fall) and whose magnitude is proportional to the speed of the object.

Therefore, it turns out that as the object falls, its speed increases, and therefore the air resistance acting against it increases too; as a result, the at some point the air resistance becomes equal (in magnitude) to the force of gravity: when this happens, the net acceleration of the object becomes zero, and so the speed of the object does not increase anymore. This speed reached by the object is called terminal velocity.

Answer: Gravity does not act on objects near Earth’s surface.

Explanation:

Answer: its c

Explanation:

Total energy is conserved.

Energy = potential energy + kinetic energy as other forms of energy are neglected.

Clearly , position A is at a higher position from the ground , so it has more potential energy.

As the energy is conserved , the kinetic energy at A must have decreased making the total energy the same as that during B.

So,to sum it up  

potential energy of the student increases and the kinetic energy decreases as he moves from B to A

When the swing goes from Position B to Position A, potential energy increases due to height gain, while kinetic energy decreases as the swing slows down.

When a swing moves from Position B (the lowest point) to Position A (a higher point), the potential energy of the student increases while the kinetic energy decreases. This is because as the swing rises, it slows down due to gravity working against the motion, converting kinetic energy into potential energy. At the highest point of the swing (Position A), the swing has its maximum potential energy and minimum kinetic energy. Conversely, as the swing descends back toward Position B, the potential energy is converted back into kinetic energy, increasing the speed of the swing.

https://brainly.com/question/29243227

#SPJ2

Answer:

The correct answer is C.

Explanation:

Answer:

It's C

Explanation:

Δλ =  3.103 m.

To solve this problem we have to know the speed of sound in both elements water and ice.

Element            Speed of sound

Water (25°C)           1493 m/s

Ice                           3200 m/s

The velocity of a wave is given by the equation v = λf, where λ is the wavelength, and f is the frecuency of the wave.

In order to calculate the wavelength we have to clear λ in the equation v = λf, resulting:

λ = v/f

Calculating the wavelength in both elements:

λ(water) = 1493 m/s / 550 Hz = 2.715 m

λ(ice) = 3200 m/s / 550 Hz = 5.818 m

So, the difference in wavelength between the wave produced in ice and the wave produced in water is:

Δλ = λ(water) - λ(ice) = 5.818 m - 2.715 m

Δλ =  3.103 m

Answer:

3.1 m

Explanation:

Answer:

He is known as the first microbiologist and also “the Father of Microbiology” because he was the first to observe bacteria underneath a microscope. He made many other significant discoveries in the field of biology and also made important changes to the microscope.

Explanation:

hope this helps. and if it did pls mark brainliest :)

Answer:

solid form

Explanation:

Heat is transferred by conduction in a solid form.

Answer:

D. 2.8 × 10⁹ N

Explanation:

The force between two charges is directly proportional to the amount of charges at the two points and inversely proportional to the square of distance between the two points.

Fe= k Q₁Q₂/r²

Q₁= -0.0045 C

Q₂= -0.0025 C

r= 0.0060 m

k= 9.00 × 10 ⁹ Nm²/C²

Fe= (9.00 × 10 ⁹ Nm²/C²×-0.0045 C×-0.0025 C)/0.0060²

=2.8 × 10⁹ N

Answer:

D. 2.8 x 10^9 N

Explanation:

A P E X

Answer:

true

Explanation:

if the lens is curved differently or the material is changed then it would affect where the image is which is calculated using the focal point.

sorry I know I'm late but please let me know if I'm right, mark brainliest, and have a great day :)

Answer:

hydrophilic

Explanation:

hydrophobic means it hates water so a hydrophobic material would separate from the water and just sit there (an example of this is oil)

When two satellites collide elastically, the total momentum before the collision is equal to the total momentum after the collision. However, the final velocities and the change in kinetic energy cannot be determined without additional information.

When two satellites collide elastically, the total momentum before the collision is equal to the total momentum after the collision. We can start by calculating the initial momentum:

Initial momentum = mass of the first satellite × velocity of the first satellite + mass of the second satellite × velocity of the second satellite

Plugging in the values:

Initial momentum = (2.50 × 10³ kg)(0.150 m/s) + (7.50 × 10³ kg)(0)

Since the second satellite is initially at rest (velocity = 0), the initial momentum simplifies to:

Initial momentum = (2.50 × 10^3 kg)(0.150 m/s) = 375 kg·m/s

Since momentum is conserved, the total momentum after the collision is also 375 kg·m/s. Let's assume the final velocities of the satellites are v1 and v2:

Final momentum = (2.50 × 10³ kg)(v1) + (7.50 × 10³ kg)(v2)

Setting the initial and final momenta equal to each other:

Initial momentum = Final momentum

375 kg·m/s = (2.50 × 10³ kg)(v1) + (7.50 × 10³ kg)(v2)

We can't solve for the individual velocities with only this equation, but we can use the fact that the satellites collide elastically. In an elastic collision, the total kinetic energy before the collision is equal to the total kinetic energy after the collision.

Using the formula for kinetic energy:

Kinetic energy = 1/2 × mass × velocity²

The initial kinetic energy is:

Initial kinetic energy = (1/2)(2.50 × 10³ kg)(0.150 m/s)² + (1/2)(7.50 × 10³ kg)(0)²

Simplifying:

Initial kinetic energy = (1/2)(2.50 × 10³ kg)(0.150 m/s)² = 56.25 J

The final kinetic energy is:

Final kinetic energy = (1/2)(2.50 × 10³ kg)(v1)² + (1/2)(7.50 × 10³ kg)(v2)²

Setting the initial and final kinetic energies equal to each other:

Initial kinetic energy = Final kinetic energy

56.25 J = (1/2)(2.50 × 10³ kg)(v1)² + (1/2)(7.50 × 10³ kg)(v2)²

Unfortunately, this equation cannot be solved with the given information and assumptions. We would need additional information, such as the angle of collision, to solve for the individual velocities and kinetic energies.

In nuclear fission, a heavy nucleus splits into two smaller, more stable nuclei, releasing a large amount of energy. These smaller nuclei are more stable because they are closer to the most stable nuclear configuration found in nickel and iron-sized nuclei.

Nuclear fission is the process in which a heavy nucleus splits into two smaller, more stable nuclei, accompanied by the release of energy. This occurs particularly with nuclei that have a mass number higher than 92. During fission, the original nucleus divides into two fragments that are not necessarily equal in size, but are usually closer to the size of iron-56, which is the most stable size for a nucleus. A notable example is the fission of uranium-235, where the nucleus splits into two smaller fragments and releases additional free neutrons and energy in the form of gamma rays.

The larger nucleus undergoing fission must rearrange its nucleons towards a configuration that is closer to that of the most stable nuclei, which are around the size of nickel and iron. This implies that during fission, the resulting nuclei are generally smaller and more stable compared to the original one. Therefore, the correct description of what forms in nuclear fission is two smaller, more stable nuclei (Option A).

Answer:

Within the core

Explanation:

The core of the sun (and of every star) is the central part of the star, the hottest one.

Its temperature is about 10 million Kelvin degrees and more - and this temperature is enough to allow the nuclei of hydrogen to overcome the electrostatic repulsion between each other and come close enough to initiate the nuclear fusion.

The nuclear fusion is the process that produces energy in a star: in a nuclear fusion reaction, the nuclei of hydrogen fuse together to form nuclei of helium, and since the mass of the final products is less than the mass of the initial products, part of the mass is converted into energy, according to Einstein's famous equation

[tex]E=mc^2[/tex]

With the exception of Asthma, all of those things, and a lot more that you don't want, could result from untreated diabetes.

Answer:

B. Numbness In Hands and Feet

C. Exhaustion

D. Weight Loss

E. Blurred Vision

Explanation:

The half-life [tex]h[/tex] of a radioactive isotope refers to its decay period, which is the average lifetime of an atom before it disintegrates.

In this case, we are given the half life of two elements:

beryllium-13: [tex]h_{B-13}=5(10)^{-10}s=0.0000000005s[/tex]

beryllium-15: [tex]h_{B-15}=2(10)^{-7}s=0.0000002s[/tex]

As we can see, the half-life of beryllium-15 is greater than the half-life of beryllium-13, but how great?

We can find it out by the following expression:

[tex]h_{B-15}=X.h_{B-13}[/tex]

Where [tex]X[/tex] is the amount we want to find:

[tex]X=\frac{h_{B-15}}{h_{B-13}}[/tex]

[tex]X=\frac{2(10)^{-7}s}{5(10)^{-10}s}[/tex]

Finally:

[tex]X=400[/tex]

Therefore:

The half-life of beryllium-15 is 400 times greater than the half-life of beryllium-13.

Answer:

0.2 Hz

Explanation:

The frequency of a wave is given by

[tex]f=\frac{v}{\lambda}[/tex]

where

f is the frequency

v is the speed of the wave

[tex]\lambda[/tex] is the wavelength

For the ocean waves in this problem,

[tex]\lambda=15 m[/tex] is the wavelength

v = 3 m/s is the speed

So their frequency is

[tex]f=\frac{3 m/s}{15 m}=0.2 Hz[/tex]

The frequency of ocean waves passing under an anchored boat can be calculated using the wave equation v = f λ. In this case, the velocity of the waves is given as 3 meters per second and the distance between wave crests (wavelength) is given as 15 meters. The frequency at which these ocean waves pass under an anchored boat is 0.2 Hz.

The frequency of ocean waves passing under an anchored boat can be calculated using the wave equation v = f λ, where v is the velocity of the waves, f is the frequency, and λ is the wavelength.

In this case, the velocity of the waves is given as 3 meters per second and the distance between wave crests (wavelength) is given as 15 meters. We need to find the frequency.

Using the wave equation, we can rearrange it to solve for frequency as f = v / λ. Substituting the given values, we get f = 3 m/s / 15 m = 0.2 Hz.

Therefore, the frequency at which these ocean waves pass under an anchored boat is 0.2 Hz.

Explanation:

It is now clear that light behaves as a wave and as a particle. It should be noted that the first to propose the corpuscular theory of light was Issac Newton, while the wave theory was initially proposed by Christian Huygens, who was contemporaneous with Newton.

Now, focusing on the corpuscular theory, Newton proposed that light is composed of tiny massless particles, traveling in a straight line and at high speed. In addition, he used the reflection phenomenon of the of light to show that it behaved like particles that when hitting a mirror were reflected by a perfectly elastic collision.

Answer:

Light does not need a medium to travel.

Explanation:

chemical energy converts  into light, heat and sound  energy

Answer: Rapid Oxidation

Explanation:

In fireworks, the energy source is the rapid oxidation (burning or exploding) of gunpowder and other flammable chemicals. This burning causes the formation of gases that are heated and expand.

This rapid expansion involves three forms of energy : 1) The motive force to carry aerial fireworks into the sky, and to separate parts of them, 2) The heated molecules that give off radiance (visible light) in various forms of displays, and 3) The energetic vibration of air molecules that creates the sound of explosions.

The buoyant force on a submerged object is the weight of the water it displaces ... the water it pushes out of the way.  That amount is simply the volume of the submerged object.  So the more volume is submerged, the greater will be the buoyant force acting on it.

Since Aluminum is less-dense than lead, the same 10kg of Aluminum needs a bigger container to hold it than 10kg of lead needs.  The aluminum needs  more volume to hold the same mass.

The aluminum displaces more water.  So the buoyant force acting on the aluminum is greater than the buoyant force acting on the lead. (B) .

I'm guessing this is a big part of the reason why fishing sinkers are not made of aluminum.

Aluminum has greater buoyant force than lead.

To determine the answer, we need to know about the buoyant force.

Thus, we can conclude that aluminum has greater buoyant force than lead.

Learn more about the buoyant force here:

brainly.com/question/1113383

#SPJ2