D. Forbade the use of U.S troops in Cambodia and Laos.
What element of a social change movement can hinder that change?
goals
division
solidarity
passion
Answer:
Division.
Explanation:
Social changes usually come about through fortuitous historical circumstances aided by explicit propositions that fit the historical moment in question —propositions such as those presented by individual thinkers adopted by social movements or by the conjunction of the premises fueling the movement collectively. As such, it is seldom the case that a movement can be thought of as monolithic; more often presenting diverse perspectives that, in the long run, if not coordinated, can present unsalvageable divisions within the movement that can bring about its disappearance.
What are four new machines that led to improved results in agriculture in the Great Plains?
What were conditions like for workers before the beginning of the labor movement?
Which of the following was a main concern of the Anti-federalists during the Constitutional Convention?
- If the states had too much power, the nation would not be united.
- The federal government did not have enough power over the states.
- Too much power in the federal government could lead to corruption.
- The federal government needed to be strong to gain the respect of other nations.
I already took this one and got a 100 on it the answers is B.The federal government did not have enough power over the states.
The main concern of the Anti-federalists was that too much power in the federal government could lead to corruption.
Explanation:The main concern of the Anti-federalists during the Constitutional Convention was that too much power in the federal government could lead to corruption. They believed that a strong federal government would create a centralized power that could easily become tyrannical and abusive.
Further, they also argued that the states should retain significant power to protect individual liberties and prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a few. By limiting the power of the federal government, they thought that the states would be able to maintain their independence and the sovereignty of the people of the region.
Learn more about Concerns of the Anti-federalists here:https://brainly.com/question/267094
#SPJ6
How did the incas practice body modification to denote social status?
When was the Fifteenth Amendment ratified?
The art of mudslinging during political campaigns prevents the general public from learning about what important thing
Answer:
Where the candidates stand on the issues.
Explanation:
Mudslinging refers to the process of deliberately spreading negative information about a candidate in order to affect his public image. This is usually motivated by a rival's desire to gain a dishonest advantage. One of the negative consequences of mudslinging is that it makes it very difficult for the general public to know what is true and what is false, and therefore, makes it difficult to understand where the candidates actually stand on the issues.
Corinthian columns have ____ at the top.
a.
simple scrolls
c.
sculptures of gods
b.
elaborate scrolls
d.
a leafy ornament
The correct answer is D. A leafy ornament
Explanation:
In architecture, a column or pillar refers to an element that mainly supports other elements and keeps a structure by transmitting the weight of the elements above the column to those below. In Ancient Greece, columns had an important role as part of temples and because of this Greeks developed three different columns that are the Doric, Ionic and the Corinthian as explained in the image included in the case of the Corinthian columns were mainly elaborate and more elaborated than the Doric and the Ionic and besides this, the image explains the Corinthian columns had leafy ornaments at the top which other columns did not have as Ionic columns hat scrolls and Doric did not have any decoration. Considering this, it can be concluded the element that was at the top of Corinthian columns was a leafy ornament.
Answer:
ℂ .)
(っ◔◡◔)っ ♥ Hope this helps! ♥
How did the Egyptian Empire continue to grow and thrive?
The Egyptian Empire grew and thrived through strategies such as military expansion, trade relations, and cultural continuity.
Explanation:The Egyptian Empire continued to grow and thrive through various strategies and developments. Firstly, the kings of Egypt expanded their power and influence by exerting military power and extracting wealth from the kingdom of Nubia and establishing contact with Mesopotamia. They also encouraged immigration and settlement of immigrants and war captives, which contributed to the acculturation and brought foreign talent into Egypt.
Another factor that contributed to the growth and prosperity of the Egyptian Empire was its trade relations with neighboring cultures. Egypt traded with the wealthy and powerful kingdom of Nubia, which was rich in gold, ivory, and slaves. Egypt also controlled trade routes to Mesopotamia, which provided access to valuable resources and facilitated economic growth.
The Egyptian Empire also experienced periods of stability and prosperity, interrupted by periodic invasions and disasters. However, throughout this history, there were many cultural, spiritual, and intellectual traditions that remained consistent, providing a foundation for continuity and resilience.
a time when Greek culture spread throughout the non-Greek world
Answer:
The Hellenistic era
Explanation:
The Hellenistic period marked a significant expansion and influence of Greek culture beyond its original borders, leaving a lasting impact on subsequent civilizations in the non-Greek world.
What is the Hellenistic period?One significant time when Greek culture spread throughout the non-Greek world was during the Hellenistic period. The Hellenistic era began after the conquests of Alexander the Great, which spanned from the late 4th century BCE to the 1st century BCE.
Following his military campaigns, Alexander established an empire that stretched from Greece to Egypt, Persia, and beyond. This vast empire facilitated the diffusion of Greek culture, known as Hellenism, to the conquered territories and regions. Greek language, art, architecture, philosophy, and literature influenced and merged with local cultures, creating a rich cultural exchange.
Learn more about Hellenistic period at https://brainly.com/question/5801235
#SPJ6
How did the allotment of property to colonists in savannah illustrate Oglethorpe's hope of providing economic opportunity to the poor?
The idea was to offer a new inception for England's working poor and to establish the colonies by expanding trade.
Oglethorpe named the thirteenth colony as Georgia after King George II, and Savannah became the first city of Georgia.
Under the agreement, the colony was established to benefit the poor, to expand trade, and to grant a protecting buffer between the northern English provinces and the Spanish in Florida.
The vision was creating Savannah which was considered as lowest and poorest of the colonies would serve as a spiritual haven for all but Catholics were forbidden from the new colony.
For allotment of property, colonists had to accept to stay for three years and have to spend the first year on public activities. Colonists are required to plant 100 mulberry trees on every ten acres of their land have to feed silkworms, which was considered an industry that never developed.
Land use regulations restricted individual holdings to 500 acres, with each family sustaining a reward of 50 acres. Parcels were not be shared, sold, leased, swapped, mortgaged, or willed. They could be acquired only by a son willing to work on the land. Otherwise, parcels returned to the administrators.
These combined policies of welfare, collectivism, and land use was enforced by Oglethorpe's in hope of providing economic opportunity to the poor.
What was one effect of the Johnson-Reed Act of 1924?
The Ku Klux Klan was revived.
The Red Scare quietly came to an end.
Immigration from eastern and southern Europe all but stopped.
Refugees from nations devastated by the Great War came to America in large numbers.
Answer:
One effect of the Johnson-Reed Act of 1924 was that immigration from eastern and southern Europe all but stopped.
Explanation:
The Johnson-Reed Act or Immigration Act of 1924 was a statutory immigration regulatory regime for the United States of America that ran from 1924 to 1965. It included, as supplementary legislation, the National Origins Act And the Asian Exclusion Act, creating a federal legal regime limiting the number of immigrants who could be admitted to the United States to a maximum of 2% of the the total number of persons with that national origin who had already resided in the country in 1890. That percentage was a reduction from the 3% limit set by the Immigration Restriction Act of 1921, which also took as a reference to the result of the population census of 1890. That law replaced the Emergency Quota Act of 1921 and was intended to curb the growth of the migration of southern Europeans, mostly Roman Catholics, and Slavs and Jews from Eastern Europe, who had begun arriving in the United States in large numbers from the 1890s, and to prohibit the entry of Asians, Indians and non-European citizens who were not eligible for naturalization.