Answer:
After the french revolution and the Napoleonic wars, Europe experienced a long period of time known as the Metternich time, during which liberalism, radicalism and other revolutionary ideas were hunted and cornered. The 1848 Revolutions challenged this conservatism and tried to create new forms of government by overtunring some of the the ruling monarchies in Europe. The communes in France actually saw the first form of organized communism and political socialism of the time and represented the end of the Metternich Europe.
Explanation:
The revolutions of 1848 tested conservative ideals, which advocated for gradual change and stability, by promoting liberalism and nationalism. Despite conservatism regaining power, the revolutions led to an adaptation of conservatism, which began to incorporate aspects of liberalism and nationalism.
How the Revolutions of 1848 Tested Conservatism Ideals
The revolutions of 1848 were a fundamental test of the ideals of conservatism. Conservatives believed that the excesses of the French Revolution proved that rapid political change leads to anarchy and terror. However, 1848's widespread revolutions across Europe challenged this premise as they combined liberal, socialist, and nationalist ideologies in opposition to the established conservative order. Conservatism, which favored gradual change and valued tradition and authority, had to confront the reality that its rigidity could not entirely suppress the rising tide of liberalism and nationalism.
Importantly, the revolutions underscored the power of nationalism, leading to conservative monarchs later integrating nationalistic elements into their own regimes. Edmund Burke's idea of conservatism advocated for slow, considered reform, opposed to drastic changes enacted by the inexperienced masses. However, even though conservative regimes largely regained power post-1848, the revolutions left an indelible mark on not just the political landscape but also on the definition and methods of conservatism itself, which began to accommodate liberal and nationalistic traits to an extent.
Political participation during the Gilded Age
A. was extremely high
B. was characterized by apathy
C. ebbed and flowed
D. peaked in the 1870s and diminished thereafter
Answer:
I would say D is your answer but not 100% sure. Sorry if it's wrong
Choose the items that CORRECTLY describe an aspect of the building of the First Transcontinental Railroad. It crossed the Rocky Mountains. Large number of Irish immigrants were used in construction going westward. It crossed the Appalachian Mountains. The Union Pacific Railroad used mostly Chinese labor. The Central Pacific Railroad built track from west to east. Large numbers of Japanese immigrants were used in eastward construction. Construction was completed before the end of the Civil War. The Central Pacific and Union Pacific railroads met at Promontory Point, Utah, completing the project.
Answer:
The items that correctly describe an aspect of the building of the First Transcontinental Railroad are:
-It crossed the Rocky Mountains.
-The Union Pacific Railroad used mostly Chinese labor.
-The Central Pacific Railroad built track from west to east.
-The Central Pacific and Union Pacific railroads met at Promontory Point, Utah, completing the project.
Explanation:
The First Transcontinental Railroad in the United States was a railroad line, built between 1863 and 1869 by the Central Pacific and Union Pacific companies, which connected Council Bluffs (Iowa) and Omaha (Nebraska) to Sacramento (California) and the Pacific Ocean in Oakland (California). Linking with the existing rail network to the east it connected, in fact, the coast of the Atlantic Ocean with the one of the Pacific for the first time with railroad. The line was popularly called Overland Route and was in service until the end of 1962. Coming into service on May 10, 1869 with the placement of the symbolic golden spike in Promontory (Utah), this route established a transcontinental mechanized transport system that revolutionized demography and the economy from the Far West of the United States.
The construction of the First Transcontinental Railroad involved crossing the Rocky Mountains, utilizing Irish and Chinese labor, building track from west to east, completing construction after the end of the Civil War, and meeting at Promontory Point, Utah.
Explanation:The construction of the First Transcontinental Railroad had several aspects:
1. It crossed the Rocky Mountains. This was a challenging task due to the rugged terrain and harsh weather conditions.
2. A large number of Irish immigrants were utilized in the construction going westward. They played a crucial role in building the railroad.
3. The Union Pacific Railroad primarily used Chinese labor to construct their portion of the railroad. Thousands of Chinese immigrants were employed for this massive undertaking.
4. The Central Pacific Railroad built track from west to east. They started from Sacramento, California, and worked their way towards Omaha, Nebraska.
5. The construction was completed after the end of the Civil War. The First Transcontinental Railroad was officially completed on May 10, 1869, when the Union Pacific and Central Pacific railroads met at Promontory Point, Utah.
Who were the big four at the paris peace conference?
British Prime Minister David Lloyd George, President Woodrow Wilson of the United States, French Premier Georges Clemenceau, and Premier Vittorio Orlando of Italy became the leaders of the conference.
Final answer:
The Big Four at the Paris Peace Conference were President Woodrow Wilson of the U.S., Prime Minister David Lloyd George of Great Britain, Prime Minister Vittorio Emanuele Orlando of Italy, and Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau of France.
Explanation:
Who Were the Big Four at the Paris Peace Conference?
The Big Four at the Paris Peace Conference were the most influential leaders representing the victorious Allied powers after World War I. These four individuals were President Woodrow Wilson of the United States, Prime Minister David Lloyd George of Great Britain, Prime Minister Vittorio Emanuele Orlando of Italy, and Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau of France. They played a crucial role in negotiating the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, which officially ended the war.
Their decisions reflected the desire to prevent future conflicts, but also included punitive measures against Germany, with the aim of securing their own nations against future aggression and maintaining or expanding their colonial possessions. This mix of idealistic and pragmatic goals among the Big Four led to a treaty that has been both praised for ending the conflicts and criticized for setting the stage for further international tensions leading to World War II.
In 1806, the antislavery forces brought a new bill before Parliament that would limit British involvement in the slave trade. Some of the most powerful testimony in favor of the bill came from former army officers who had been to the Caribbean and had seen the courage of the former slaves and the horrors of slavery. The slaves spoke through the testimony of the very men who had gone to fight them. One member of Parliament told his colleagues of the tortures he had seen in the islands. Slavery was not an abstraction, an economic force, a counter in the game of world politics—it was the suffering of men and women. Members of Parliament were being confronted with the reality of slavery, just as audiences at Clarkson's lectures were when he showed shackles and whips. While Parliament debated the new bill, Clarkson and his allies went on lecturing, talking, changing minds all across England. They succeeded. Newspapers reported that even in Bristol, a port city with a harbor filled with slave ships, "the popular sentiment has been very strongly expressed against the continuance of that traffick in human flesh." William Wilberforce, another leader of the abolitionist cause, felt the new mood in his country. "God can turn the hearts of men," he marveled. Many members of Parliament recognized the same change in the "sense of the nation." In 1807 a bill to ban all English involvement in slave trading passed the House of Commons, then the House of Lords. At precisely noon on March 25, King George III signed the law.
How do the authors use English history to support the claim that many people joined the antislavery movement for moral reasons?
A. The authors explain the details of the bill that would limit British involvement in the trading of enslaved people.
B. The authors use events from English history to describe the economic impact of involuntary servitude.
C. The authors provide a primary-source quotation from a British abolitionist named William Wilberforce.
D. The authors summarize a newspaper article about ships in Bristol carrying enslaved people.
Answer:C
The authors provide a primary-source quotation from a British abolitionist named William Wilberforce.
Explanation:
Answer:
Hi!
The answer to your question is option C. The authors provide a primary-source quotation from a British abolitionist named William Wilberforce.
Explanation:
The author uses english history to support the claim that many people joined the ansislavery movement by giving a quote that can be found in the paragraph. This quore by British abolitionist William Wilberforce, brings our attention to the fact that "the popular sentiment has been very strongly expressed against the continuance of that traffick in human flesh." As we can see clearly on this quote, people were starting to realize that trafficking humans was abhorrent, and that this should stop. This shows a clear rejection of slavery. Therefore, the answer is letter C.
Music trails at least 50-100 years behind changing trends and philosophy in society. True False
Answer:
it is False your welcome :)
What was not an advantage that Fort Supply troops had over the Plains tribes during the Winter War?
A Tribes camped in larger villages due to the cold.
B. Tribes did not expect attacks from the federal troops in the winter.
C. Tribal leaders were detained in Texas.
D. Tribes would have difficulty defending themselves due to fewer supplies and weaker horses.
Answer:C.Tribal leaders were detained in Texas.
Explanation:
Answer:
it's c. Tribal leaders were detained in Texas.
Explanation:
Where did former president barack obama get his law degree?
Answer:
Harvard
Explanation:
PLEASE HELP!
Why did UN coalition troops battle Iraqi forces in 1991?
Iraq had invaded Saudi Arabia, along with its other border nations.
Iraq had invaded Kuwait, which was a major source of the world’s oil.
The United Nations wanted to remove Saddam Hussein from power.
The United Nations wanted to prevent the trade of illegal drugs.
Answer:
Iraq had invaded Kuwait, which was a major source of the world's oil
Explanation:
In 1991, led by Saddam Hussein, the Iraqi military moved towards Kuwait. It managed to invade the small country without any problem and very rapidly. The main reason behind this was that Iraq wanted Kuwait to be part of its territory, thus to have even larger oil reserves and to be one of the major figures in the world's economy. This was not seen fondly by the international community, so there was a quick reaction from the UN, sending coalition troops to push back the Iraqis. The Iraqi military was not strong enough to sustain the coalition troops so it was defeated and Kuwait was freed, though the small country had a lot of damage done on it that short period of time.
The Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 came to an end when A) the Soviet Union agreed to withdraw its nuclear missiles from Cuba. B) CIA-backed rebels were defeated by the Cuban army at the Bay of Pigs. C) the United Nations allowed the US to install nuclear missiles in Key West. D) a nuclear disarmament plan for the US and the Soviet Union was agreed upon. Eliminate
D because it was called to an armistice where both country’s decided to withdraw their missiles
jewish people and christians alike travel to,or make a pilgrimage to what holy place to honor their religion
Answer:
Altars
or church
Explanation:
Both Jewish and Christian people regard Jerusalem as a holy place for pilgrimage. Christians visit as it is the location of Jesus's crucifixion and resurrection, while Jews honor the site of the ancient Temple of Solomon.
Explanation:Jewish and Christian people alike consider Jerusalem to be a sacred place where they undertake pilgrimages to honor their religions. For Christians, Jerusalem is the site of Jesus's crucifixion and resurrection, embodying the core of Christian faith. For Jews, Jerusalem was the location of the Temple of Solomon, a historically central place of worship that deeply resonates with Jewish heritage. Although the physical temple no longer stands, the Western Wall, part of the ancient structure, remains a focal point of prayer and pilgrimage. Moreover, Islam regards Jerusalem as a significant place, with the Dome of the Rock and the Al-Aqsa Mosque situated there, representing key aspects of their faith.
Compare and contrast slaves in the north to slaves in the south
Based onto the knowledge I've gathered of learning about Northern and Southern slaves:
Northern SlavesDuring and immediately following the Revolutionary War, abolitionist laws were passed in most Northern states and a movement developed to abolish slavery. Northern states depended on free labor and all had abolished slavery by 1805. Northern slaves are much more privileged and treated a little bit more of a citizen working than a slave. Southern SlavesUnfortunately for the Southern slaves. Life's a challenge for them therefore its hard for them because they live in constant and continuous fear.During work and outside of it, slaves suffered physical abuse, since the government allowed it. Treatment was usually harsher on large plantations, which were often managed by overseers and owned by absentee slaveholders. Small slaveholders worked together with their slaves and sometimes treated them more humanely.Hope this helps you!
Have a great day!
<3-~- WolfieWolfFromSketch -~- <3what possible consequences could arise by taking land away from one group of people and giving it to another?
Final answer:
Taking land from one group and giving it to another can destroy livelihoods, identities, and cultural heritage, leading to displacement, poverty, and a loss of cultural knowledge. The impact of such actions, historically seen in colonization and still present in neocolonial activities, has deep and long-lasting effects on the original landholders.
Explanation:
Taking land from one group of people and giving it to another can have a variety of serious consequences. One of the primary impacts is the threat to people's livelihoods and identity. The land is often more than just a place to live or work; it is integral to the community's cultural practices, such as worshiping at ancestral graves or traditional agriculture. When these communities face displacement, they not only lose their economic foundation but also their cultural heritage and community bonds. Moreover, the introduction of concepts like individual land ownership can sever traditional ties to the land, especially among children who inherit land but are disconnected from it by other influences like boarding schools.
Exploitation and alienation of indigenous peoples were historical realities, particularly during the colonization of the Americas. Colonizers often imposed their own systems of land ownership, disregarding the communal and spiritual connections that indigenous peoples had with their land. This resulted in extensive poverty among native populations and a lasting disruption to their way of life, echoing into modern times.
Additionally, such land appropriations by colonizers or for commercial agricultural expansion have repeatedly led to the uprooting of indigenous groups. With this forced migration came a range of issues including poverty, health decline, and loss of the native knowledge that contributed to humanity's rich cultural tapestry. This process, called neocolonialism, continues to affect indigenous communities, as their forced displacement from ancestral lands has profound socio-economic and cultural implications, illustrating a type of second colonialism that persists.
Highlight Jefferson’s restated thesis in the text. We . . . solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved . . . And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
Answer: “they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved”
Explanation: Correct answer got it from my teacher.
Answer:
"they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved"
Explanation:
What rhetorical device does Dr. King use at the beginning of the excerpt? What is its purpose?
Answer:
Martin Luther King, Jr. made many speeches over the course of his life. However, his most famous speech, the so-called "I Have A Dream" speech, is dominated by one particular rhetorical device: anaphora.
Anaphora is a type of parallelism in which a phrase is repeated at the beginning of several lines. In this speech, the phrase "I have a dream..." is repeated, as King enumerates the various dreams he has for African American people. This...
Explanation:
Final answer:
Dr. King uses repetition in his 'I Have a Dream' speech to underscore the importance of his message and to resonate with his audience. This rhetorical strategy creates a memorable rhythm and enhances the speech's persuasive power, aligning with the prophetic rhetoric of the Civil Rights Movement.
Explanation:
The rhetorical device that Dr. King uses at the beginning of his 'I Have a Dream' speech is repetition. This device serves to emphasize his vision of racial equality and justice. The phrase 'I have a dream' is repeated multiple times throughout the speech, creating a powerful and memorable rhythm that resonates with listeners.
By using repetition, Dr. King underscores the importance of his dream and makes it a central focus of the speech. This rhetorical strategy also helps to convey the urgency of the civil rights movement's demands and instills the speech in the memory of his audience and future generations. The repeated refrain galvanizes the audience, evoking strong emotions and a sense of shared purpose.
The purpose of employing such a rhetorical device is not only to emphasize the key message, but also to appeal to the audience's hearts and minds, making the speech more persuasive and powerful. It is a technique that aligns with the prophetic rhetoric described by Houck and Dixon, which was used to great effect during the Civil Rights Movement.
The president can call a ________ session of congress, at which time both the house and senate meet together.
Answer:
A special session of the Congress
Explanation:
He has the right under Article 2 of the congress
How did the August Coup result in the collapse of the Soviet Union?
A: It made the Soviet people reject the Communist Party.
B: It discredited Mikhail Gorbachev.
C: It forced Boris Yeltsin to resign from the Communist Party.
D: It led to the resignation of the Central Committee.
The correct answer is: B: It discredited Mikhail Gorbachev.
The August Coup in the Soviet Union was led by hard lined communists that were opposing Gorbachev's politics, especially the reforms that he was implementing. The August Coup lasted for only two days, and it didn't caused any direct problems, but it had a very influence among the people in the Soviet Union. It managed to lead to large scale loss of popularity for Gorbachev among most of the ethnic groups in the nations. The end result in the coming year was the falling apart of the Soviet Union and the formation of numerous independent nations from it, with Mikhail Gorbachev being pushed out of the political scene.
Answer:
It discredited Mikhail Gorbachev.
Prior to the 20th century, those who had survived beyond young adulthood were increasingly vulnerable to which infectious diseases?
the answer is measles, mumps,rubella. there were no vaccines for these diseases at that time.
Differences between whites and african americans in life expectancy at age 75 are
Answer:
Ive heard that African Americans live longer so they have a greater chance of reaching 75
Explanation:
describe the results of ethnic conflict in Bosnia in the 1990s
Answer:
Bosnian War, ethnically rooted war (1992–95) in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a former republic of Yugoslavia with a multiethnic population comprising Bosniaks (Bosnian Muslims), Serbs, and Croats.
Explanation:
Which selection listed below describes Peru under President Alberto Fujimori after he suspended the Constitution and seized complete political power for himself?
Answer:
B.) Autocracy
Explanation:
1 person rule
Answer:
After President Alberto Fujimori suspended the Constitution and seized complete political power for himself, Peru was an autocracy.
Explanation:
Alberto Fujimori is a Peruvian-Japanese agronomist, physicist, mathematician, mathematician and politician. He was President of Peru from July 28, 1990 to November 17, 2000. He was the second person of Asian descent to become state head of a country in South America, after Arthur Chung, who was president of Guyana.
Vladimiro Montesinos, a major contributor to his government, was under heavy control of the media. Indeed, Montesinos himself appeared in several videos in which he bribed members of other parties to support Fujimori.
After ten years in office, at the end of 2000 he was embroiled in in corruption scandals. Taking a trip to Brunei, he went to Japan, where he resigned as President by fax a few days later. The Congress of the Republic decided to declare the presidency of the Republic vacant, alleging "moral incapacity" and incapacitating him for a period of ten years.
Why did socialism fail to become a major force in american politics between 1900 and 1940 despite widespread dissatisfaction with the social and economic order and significant support for radical movements during that time period?
Answer:
Although socialisim was attempted, it failed to gain major political power as it did not appeal to the typical worker, and the Country was preoccupied with both World Wars, the Red scare, the great depression to try and change its attention to forming a new party.
Explanation:
Arguments for the ratification of the Constitution can be found in what historical document(s)?
A. The Article of Confederation
B. The Federalist Papers
C. Declaration of Independence
D. The Bill of Rights
Answer: B, the federalist papers
Explanation:
this is really just a educated guess based on what I do know
what should be included in an outline for an informative essay? check all that apply
what are the options?
Answer:
Assuming the options are:
A.the introduction, which describes the topic
B.the conclusion, which summarizes the topic
C.the premise, which explains the topic purpose
D.the reasons, which explain the topic choice
E.body paragraphs, which describe the subtopics
Your answers will be A, B, and E
Explanation:
I have taken this quiz before
Which action can congress not perform according to the constitution?
Answer:
Congress can not appoint a New Judge to the Supreme Court
Explanation:
Answer:
appointing a new justice to the supreme court
Explanation:
Why did the creators of eye of the storm experience hurricane katrina?
Because they did not evacuate their offices, which were in the direct path of the hurricane. ~ APEX
Answer:
Because they did not evacuate their offices, which were in the direct path of the hurricane
Explanation:
Apex
Which two countries fought in the war of 1812
United States and Great Britain
When the United States tried to invade Canada and we held them off, yet they won’t admit that they lost
Write a 4–5 paragraph essay that compares and contrasts Village Life in America and A Confederate Girl’s Diary. Draw conclusions from both texts to make your points. Support your statements with quotations and evidence from the texts. Write using clear and varied sentences.
Please only answer with an essay that is at least 4 paragraphs long.
Answer:
an essay that is at least 4 paragraphs long
Explanation:
dont copy and paste thats how we get a zero on our essays
Answer:
The two young ladies were experiencing a period of war. The two of them loathed the war and needed it to finish as quickly as time permits. They have both experienced snapshots of dread and wretchedness, yet in addition joy and delight at now and again. They have both lost relatives and companions that they have adored.
The two females were announcing and seeing what was occurring around them and they were excellent scholars as well. Toward the finish of the war, both Dawson and Richards were exceptionally happy the war was finished.
There were additionally a couple of contrasts with the two journals as well. The greatest distinction is that Richards is on the association's side while Dawson is on the Confederates side.
Dawson was devasted at the loss of her side. "Thursday the thirteenth came the horrendous greetings of the give up of Lee and his military on the ninth. Everyone cried". Richards was triumphant at the success of her side. "Lee has given up! and every one of the general population appear to be insane in outcome. The chimes are ringing, young men and young ladies, people are going through the lanes wild with fervor".
At long last, Richards appears to be progressively similar to a quiet and entertaining individual while Dawson searches for retribution "Retaliation is mine; I will reimburse, saith the Lord." This is murder! God show leniency toward the individuals who did it!".
To whole everything up the two journals were altogether different despite the fact that they were composed also, in the meantime. The two young ladies were solid all through the common war, however the lost a few relatives. At last, Richards was extremely glad that her side won the war while Dawson was crushed next to her misfortune.
Use the image to answer the question.
Which of the following related humanitarian crises does the image signify? Select all that apply.
poverty
enslavement
terrorism
migration
hunger
Answer:
Hunger, Poverty
Explanation:
The person holding the food has people all around them with their hands outstretched, and empty. They show a trait of desire for what the person whoms hands are full of, food. Therefore you can deduce that they want food and are hungry.
The people with their hands outstretched seem to not have enough money for food either, so you can deduce they are poor.
Answer:
Hunger and poverty
Explanation:
The typical Byzantine sculpture was:
A) wood carvings
B) large plaster carvings
C) golden icons
D) bas-relief
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Answer:
the real answer is D ive got in on my class
Explanation:
Tougher gun laws and increased government oversight of business would most likely be supported by a member of the ___ Party. Democratic Libertarian Republican Prohibition
Democratic Libertarian
Tougher gun laws and increased government oversight of business would most likely be supported by a member of the Democratic Party, reflecting the party's liberal stance on these issues. Conversely, Republicans and Libertarians typically oppose such measures, favoring less government intervention.
Tougher gun laws and increased government oversight of business would most likely be supported by a member of the Democratic Party. This aligns with the party's more liberal stance on the regulation of firearms and the economy, as well as creating a social safety net. For instance, Democrats tend to favor measures such as universal background checks, waiting periods, and bans on certain types of weapons.
By contrast, Movement Conservatives, who are part of the Republican Party, typically oppose business regulation and government-funded social welfare programs. The Supreme Court case of Printz v. United States (1997) marked a significant victory for this conservative viewpoint by ruling that the federal government could not require states to perform background checks for gun purchases.
Libertarians often lean towards minimal government intervention in both personal and economic matters, advocating for lower taxes and decreased regulation across the board. However, they are not entirely synonymous with the Republican Party, as their views on personal liberty and economic freedom can diverge from mainstream conservative thought.
It is important to note that while the Democratic Party generally supports more active government intervention in regulating the economy and providing social services, there are diverse opinions within the party. That said, when it comes to tougher gun laws and increased government oversight of business, it is typically the Democratic platform that advocates for these measures.