How were growing tensions over slavery eased in the early 1800s? the sale of western lands the election of 1824 the passage of the Missouri Compromise

Answer:

His pardon of Richard Nixon

Explanation:

Answer:

The event that cost Ford much support early in his presidency was his pardon to Nixon.

Explanation:

During his presidency the Vietnam War ended and the Helsinki Accords were signed. In terms of domestic policy, Ford faced the worst economic outlook since the Great Depression of 1929: during his presidency the country went into recession and there was rising inflation. One of his most controversial decisions was to pardon the President Richard Nixon, involved in the so-called Watergate Scandal. In 1976 Ford would defeat Ronald Reagan in the Republican Party nomination, but he would lose by a small margin to Democrat Jimmy Carter in the presidential elections that year.

The answer is A it was John Locke

Answer: By providing the the basic outline of modern economics

Explanation:

Adam smith´s economic ideas influenced the Enlightenment by largely providing the the basic outline of modern economics.

The idea of laissez-faire which means let go in French, postulated that transactions between private parties must be  free from government intervention. The enlightment idea behind this concept was to restore human potential by returning to a natural order without  regulations,tariffs and or subsidies.

Answer: the correct answer is distribution of wealth.

Explanation:

Answer:

equal distribution of wealth

Explanation:

Mark brainliest

All are reliable except personal history blogs.

The correct option is personal history blogs.

To learn more about personal history blogs, refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/11047615

#SPJ2

The most profitable level of output for a monopolist is where marginal cost is equal to marginal revenue, allowing the monopolist to maximize profits at the quantity and price where total revenue is greatest above total cost.

The most profitable level of output for a monopolist is determined by a key economic principle: setting marginal cost (MC) equal to marginal revenue (MR), a condition which signifies profit maximization. At the profit-maximizing quantity, total revenue minus total cost yields the greatest profit. To clarify, when MR is greater than MC, increasing output will increase profits, hence, a monopolist will continue to produce more. When MC exceeds MR, producing additional units would actually decrease profits. Therefore, a monopolist will determine their profit-maximizing output level at the quantity where MR equals MC. This aligns with the graphical example where profit is maximized at the output level where the area representing total revenue is greatest above total cost.

In practice, monopolists often have limited information on their complete revenue and cost curves but can estimate the effects of small or moderate changes in output based on marginal costs and marginal revenues, using this marginal approach to find the balance that maximizes profits.

Following this strategy, the monopolist first determines the quantity to produce, Q1, where MR=MC. Then, the firm sets the price, P1, which is identified by the demand curve at quantity Q1. Profits are calculated by multiplying the price per unit by the output, Q1P1, and then subtracting the total cost, which is the average cost of producing Q1 times Q1. This profit is represented graphically by the non-checkered area between total revenue and total cost.

During the World War II, the US authorities decided to relocate and incarcerate the Japanese citizens into concentration camps. The majority of the Japanese diaspora lived on and around the West Coast, so this is where it all happened. It is estimated that between 110,000 and 120,000 people that had Japanese ancestry were taken into these camps. The reason was that the US authorities feared that these people will spy for the Japanese, and that they will be their ears and eyes on their soil, though there was not a single proof for such a thing.

The Korematsu vs US was a court case in the US where Korematsu was trying to convince the US authorities that the people of Japanese ancestry do not pose any threat to the national security, and that they should be released as they are kept illegally as prisoners.

Final answer:

During WWII, President Roosevelt's Executive Order 9066 led to the internment of over 110,000 Japanese Americans based on fear, not evidence of disloyalty. The Supreme Court's Korematsu v. United States decision upheld this action, citing war powers. The government later apologized and compensated survivors, highlighting a historical example of the far-reaching impact of executive powers.

Explanation:

The internment of Japanese Americans during World War II occurred after President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed Executive Order 9066 in 1942, following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. The order authorized the establishment of internment camps for persons of Japanese descent, affecting over 110,000 individuals, the majority of whom were U.S. citizens. This action was based on the fear that those individuals might assist Japan in the war. Despite a lack of evidence of disloyalty or espionage, these individuals, many of them children, were forcibly removed from their homes and communities.

Korematsu v. United States was a landmark Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the legality of the internment on December 18, 1944. The decision was controversial and upheld the government's decision as a means of national security during wartime, although it infringed upon the constitutional rights of over two-thirds of the individuals interned who were American citizens. In this particular case, Fred Korematsu challenged the internment order, but the Supreme Court ruled against him, stating that the internment was justified under the war powers granted to the President.

In recognition of the injustice, the U.S. government later apologized and provided compensation to the survivors of the internment camps through the Civil Liberties Act of 1988. Despite the eventual acknowledgement of the wrongs committed, the Korematsu case remains a significant example of the extent of executive power during wartime and the vulnerabilities in the constitutional checks and balances.

Answer:

Martin Luther King was the father of Martin Luther King Jr. He was a priest at his church.

Explanation:

Answer: Martin Luther King an Activist. Who fought for the rights to get blacks and whites to come together

Explanation:

The correct answers are #1 and #4.

Have A Great day!

Answer:

The correct answers are 1 and 4.

Explanation:

Answer:

Patrick Henry was an Anti-Federalist and opposed the Constitution.

Explanation:

During the War of Independence, Patrick Henry was the first governor of Virginia (1776-79); he also held this position from 1784 to 86. He refused to sit at the Philadelphia Convention (1787) because he was in favor of direct democracy and state sovereignty. He felt that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, and radically opposed the federalist James Madison.

The statement that describes Patrick Henry is that he was an Anti-Federalist and opposed the Constitution..

Patrick Henry was the first governor of Vir.ginia (1776-79) and a politician who felt that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, and radically opposed the federalist James Madison.

Hence, the statement that describes Patrick Henry is that he was an Anti-Federalist and opposed the Constitution..

Therefore, the Option B is correct.

Read more about Patrick Henry

brainly.com/question/691671

Answer:

Because it allows only valid laws to remain in force across the country.

Explanation:

Judicial review is a term related to the power of the US Supreme Court. Through that power, judges have the authority to review existing laws and regulations in the country to determine if those laws are constitutional, if laws are not constitutional they will be inactivated. Judicial review is important to prevent unfounded laws from continuing in the country.

Failure of landlords to maintain tenements during the early 1900s led to overcrowded, unsanitary living conditions resulting in widespread illness and a lower quality of life for tenants, primarily the working poor. It also led to a dependency on work or school dining halls.

A direct result of landlords not maintaining their tenements during the early 1900s was a worsened quality of life for the occupants, primarily the working poor.

These tenements, often overcrowded and lacking basic sanitation and ventilation, led to widespread illnesses such as typhoid and cholera. Furthermore, the  inadequatehousing conditions led to dependence on work or school dining halls as housing, clothing, and food were scarce. Poor neighborhoods often existed right next to the affluent ones, illustrating the sharp contrast in living conditions.

Many landlords did discriminate, particularly against African Americans and newly arrived immigrants, increasing overcrowding and deteriorating living conditions. Even with regulations aiming to outlaw dangerous living conditions, implementation was often unsuccessful, especially when landlords chose not to maintain their properties sufficiently.

https://brainly.com/question/33726478

#SPJ12

Answer: Caravan routes seaways and highways made trade easier

Explanation: Do not Know For sure. sorry i hope this helped.

Answer:

Caravan routes seaways and highways made trade easier.

Explanation:

Before the Roman Emperor Constantine I decided to create a new capital in Byzantium, the city had already enjoyed a long history. Byzantium was located in the Black Sea, and the fact that the city had access to the sea meant that it was an important trading port. Moreover, the city was located between Europe and Asia, and it acted as a nexus between the two continents. Caravan routes passed through the city, making trade much easier. All of these were reasons for the Emperor to establish his "New Rome" in the city of Byzantium.

Answer:

soviet union

Explanation:

Answer:

Soviet Union

Explanation:

Answer:

It’s used in construction to lift weights. (B.)

Answer:

Its B

Explanation:

Hope this helps

This is in my opinion one of the aspects that makes the central courts and the different lines of thought within a single subject so interesting. The clash of ideas that we have in this case is a perfect example.

On one side we have those who look at the current 30 million uninsured Americans, which include millions in Texas, and the undeniable success it had in Massachusetts. Most of them conclude that this mandate is a government success.

On the other hand, we can find those who believe that this is a terrible invasion of the government to the citizen's free will to choose their own healthcare options, they see government overreach, and at the same time an unprecedented intrusion on individual liberties to which there is no justification.

Unfortunately this is something that millions of Americans have been forced into. It's evident how they refused to create a public health care system, and instead give more power to the private sector.

After this short debate of ideas, I will give you one question to ponder on: Which principle is more important? Your freedom, your civil liberties, and your freedom from the government line of thought, or the possibilty of providing health care to millions of uninsured Americans?

I hope this solves your question!

Answer:

An argument for buying insurance may be that it allows people to have a garantee when any kind of medical need comes up.

Explanation:

Having a health insurance will always serve as help, both for emergencies and for regular visits to the doctor. Besides, the truth is that having a private medical treatment, whenever and wherever you need it is better than having to find a place where you can be treated for free, if you ever find one.

However, it is also true that having a health insurance is expensive and not everyone can afford it, so that can serve as an argument against it, and the fact that health insurance companies are known for having you paying even more each day.

Answer:Although no monopoly can practice perfect price discrimination, it does simplify the analysis, because its marginal revenue curveis exactly equal to the market demand curve. 

Monopolists practice price discrimination to maximize profits. They produce the same amount of output as in a perfectly competitive industry but eliminate consumer surplus by making each buyer pay the perceived worth of the product. However, the demand for the product determines the maximum price they can set.

A monopolist practices price discrimination to maximize their profits. This scenario is often referred to as 'perfect price discrimination.' In such a case, the monopolist produces more output, the same amount as would be produced in a perfectly competitive industry. However, there's no consumer surplus since every buyer is paying exactly what they believe the product is worth.

Despite being able to set any price for its products, the demand for the firm's product limits the price. Not every monopolist, even those fully protected by substantial barriers to entry, can override this rule.

At times, firms in an oligopoly might act like a monopoly to benefit as a group. Nevertheless, each firm may be tempted to produce slightly more and earn higher profits. If some oligopolists yield to this temptation, the competition can become so severe that they may find themselves earning zero economic profits, resembling perfect competitors.

https://brainly.com/question/34526156

#SPJ6

Answer:

Disease: the spreading of new diseases meant that people (from old world and new one) were being exposed to diseases their bodies couldn’t fight off so many people died.

Plants: Bringing different places from place to place would cause the spread of invasive species and would kill off native plants. Sometimes whipping out an intire species of places and destroying echo systems.

Animals: bringing new animals from place to place would sometimes carry diseases (pigs) if they got out they would destroy echo systems

Explanation:

During the Columbian Exchange, plants, animals, and disease shaped both the New and Old Worlds.

Therefore, we can conclude that the Columbian Exchange shaped both the New and Old world.

Learn more about the Columbian Exchange here:

brainly.com/question/2206977

Answer:

Isolationism refers to America's longstanding reluctance to become involved in European alliances and wars. Isolationists held the view that America's perspective on the world was different from that of European societies and that America could advance the cause of freedom and democracy by means other than war.

American isolationism did not mean disengagement from the world stage. Isolationists were not averse to the idea that the United States should be a world player and even further its territorial, ideological and economic interests, particularly in the Western Hemisphere.

Explanation:

Answer:

The 54th Massachusetts Regiment of the Union Army during the Civil War is most well known for the fact that it was the first African American infantry fighting regiment. The story of the 54th Massachusetts gained further national attention through the movie Glory in 1989.

Explanation:

Answer: Their brave fighting showed that African Americans would be willing to fight.

Answer:

c-the increased demand for manufactured goods resulted in a lack of opportunities for educated workers

Industrialization resulted in increased social inequality due to the development of distinctive social classes and poor working conditions for the working class, contrasting sharply with the wealthy industrial bourgeoisie. Despite its benefits in technological advancements, the initial impact exacerbated social disparities.

How did industrialization affect societies around the world? Among the options provided, B. The creation of new jobs resulted in an increase in social inequality between members of different classes reflects one of the significant impacts of industrialization on societies globally. Industrialization led to the emergence of an urban working class and a wealthy industrial bourgeoisie, thereby increasing social inequality. The rapid urbanization and the development of factories necessitated a large labor force, which saw a significant migration of people from rural to urban areas seeking employment. However, the burgeoning factory system often resulted in poor working conditions, low wages, and long hours, which starkly contrasted with the lives of the factory owners and the emerging middle class. This sharp divide contributed to heightened social tensions and inequalities.

While it's true that industrialization also led to technological advancements and improvements in living standards over time, its initial impact profoundly exacerbated social disparities. The novel dynamics of urban life, characterized by overcrowding, poor living conditions, and the lack of a cohesive community, further complicated these social inequalities. In response to these challenges, various social and labor movements began to emerge, advocating for better living and working conditions, which gradually led to reforms.

The correct option for the president's major roles does the passage demonstrate is D. Chief diplomat

A Chief diplomat is a characteristic commonly accomplished by using a head of the United States executive department. Examples of chief diplomats are United States President Joe Biden and Canadian prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Conclusion: As a Chief diplomat, the president (in presidential democracies just like the u.s.) establishes and implements overseas policies, conducts international negotiations, and prepares projects of worldwide agreements and treaties. he or she also appoints ambassadors and is a national spokesperson when it comes to foreign nations.

Learn more about the Chief diplomat here https://brainly.com/question/18030389

#SPJ2

Final answer:

The described scenario demonstrates the U.S. president's role as a chief diplomat, where they engage in an executive agreement to implement part of a treaty without Congress's approval.

Explanation:

The passage demonstrates the U.S. president acting in the role of a chief diplomat. As the chief diplomat, the president has the authority to enter into executive agreements with leaders of other countries. These executive agreements do not require approval from Congress, though they have the same force as treaties while in effect.

In the scenario described, the president uses an executive agreement to implement parts of a nuclear arms limitation treaty, even after Congress refuses to sign the formal treaty. This executive approach is often used in foreign policy matters, especially when the treaty process proves to be onerous or when prompt action is required.

D. Citizens are informed about important issues. Elected officials better understand what citizens want.

By casting a ballot, residents are taking part in the vote-based process. Residents vote in favor of pioneers to address them and their thoughts, and the pioneers support the residents' advantages. There are two extraordinary rights just for U.S. residents: casting a ballot in government decisions and campaigning for bureaucratic positions.

A vote-based system, signifying the "rule of individuals", is an arrangement of government where the residents practice power straightforwardly or choose delegates from among themselves to structure an overseeing body, like a parliament. A vote-based system is once in a while alluded to as the "rule of the greater part".

Learn more about citizens on the political system here

https://brainly.com/question/14636352

#SPJ2

Final answer:

The most accurate cause-and-effect diagram illustrating the impact of informed citizens on the political system would show that such citizens lead to elected officials understanding citizen desires better, resulting in a government that reflects public interests.

Explanation:

The cause-and-effect diagram that best illustrates one main effect of informed citizens on the political system would likely highlight how informed citizens demand political accountability and influence policy by understanding critical issues and making deliberate choices.

Among the provided options, the diagram suggesting that informed citizens lead to elected officials better understanding what citizens want most accurately represents this dynamic. This is because informed citizens are more likely to engage with their government by voting, campaigning, and informing representatives of their opinions, which in turn ensures that government actions reflect the interests and concerns of the populace.

Answer:

The correct answer is A) Portuguese goods were less valuable than Chinese goods

Explanation:

At the time, the Chinese civilization was one of the most advanced in the world. The products they made including silk, ornaments, porcelain etc had a lot of value in countries like Portugal who had a growing income.

However,  Portuguese products were not of very high quality. The Portuguese developed textiles, wooden products and even imported new agriculture products from South America. However, these products were not considered valuable in China.

Hence, Ming China wanted the Portuguese to pay in more valuable for Gold and Silver.

Answer:

Portuguese goods were less valuable than Chinese goods (a) (option 1)

Explanation:

Answer:

37. C

38. C

Explanation:

The US drafted the Marshall Plan to help rebuild Eastern Europe countries.

The correct answer is A) to provide food to reduce famine, fuel to heat houses and factories, and money to jump-start economic growth.

The United States devise the Marshall Plan, which gave about $13 billion in grants and loans to nations in Western Europe to provide food to reduce famine, fuel to heat houses and factories, and money to jump-start economic growth.

The European Recovery Program or Marshall Plan sent help to Western European countries after the destruction and consequences generated by World War II. Secretary of State George C.Marshall drafted the plan that sent almost $14 billion dollars to reconstruct cities, provide food to reduce famine, fuel to heat houses and factories, and money to jump-start economic growth in Western Europe. The plan also was intended to stop any help from the Soviet Union that wanted to spread Communism in different parts of Europe.

Mongols it’s number 2

the CORRECT answer is 3) assyrians

Answer:

C.) to divide the communist and democratic parts of Berlin

Explanation:

Khrushchev ordered a construction of the Berlin Wall because he wanted to separate the communist and the democratic parts of the city. The communists where well known fro putting on barriers, be it physical or political where their zones of interest were bordering the ones of their enemies. In order to stop the spread of the democratic ideas in their area and thus having social problems and unrest to deal with, the Soviets decided to to put a physical barrier, thus stopping the people to communicate, move between the two parts of the city, or even see each other.

Answer:

The main two countries where the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

The cold war was the race to see who could "own" the world and who was stronger.

Answer: raising of Jairus' daughter and Transfiguration

Answer:

transfiguration and rasing jarius' daughter

Explanation: