How is a low price an incentive to a consumer?
A) Low prices serve as incentive to buy more.
B) Low prices are incentive to consumers to buy less.
C) Low prices are incentive to producers to sell more.
D) Low prices are incentive for producers to stop selling.

Answer:

yep, the answer is D

Explanation:

took the test on edge 2021.

Answer:

B for my plato peoples

Explanation:

Answer:

The kings of France, England, and Spain urged exploration and settlement of the New World because they wanted to expand their empires by acquiring land.

Explanation:

In the 1400s, trade routes to China and the other eastern countries were cut for Europeans. It happened that the Muslim peoples, after several religious clashes in the Middle East, decided that no Christian kingdom could trade using its routes. This led to many European countries, mainly Spain, Portugal, France and England, deciding to explore various routes with the aim of reaching the east to trade with China and India, and obtain the precious spices that were highly valued in the European market.

This was how the Spanish kings financed the trip of Christopher Columbus, who in 1492 discovered the American continent. Once the Europeans became aware of the existence of this territory, and found that it did not belong to any of the known European kingdoms, they began to invade these lands and conquer them, seeking to obtain the maximum benefit from the natural resources available in the American lands.

Answer: I think the answer is D

Slater assisted in the transfer of industrialization from Britain to the United States. As a result, Option (C) is the appropriate response.

In the late 18th and early 19th centuries, Britain experienced rapid industrial development that quickly spread to Western Europe and North America. This period of time is known as the Industrial Revolution. Industrialization began with the introduction of new and improved large-scale production techniques and equipment.

The Industrial Revolution was sparked by Britain's high-wage, low-energy economy, which was the result of successful worldwide trade. There was a need for technologies that replaced labor with capital and energy due to high wages and inexpensive energy. Numerous industries used these incentives.

Various excellent outcomes came from the Industrial Revolution. A rise in wealth, the output of commodities, and the standard of living were a few among them.

Therefore, Option (C) is the correct choice.

Learn more about Industrialization, from:

brainly.com/question/7721379

#SPJ5

Your question is incomplete, probably the complete question is:

Samuel Slater worked in a textile factory in Britain. Britain was the first country to invent the machine that spins a thread. This spinning machine sped up the production of cloth. The British wanted to maintain their manufacturing advantage, so it was illegal to take the plans for those machines out of the country. It was also illegal for trained textile workers to leave. However, Samuel Slater wanted to go to the United States, so he left Britain in disguise. Once he reached the United States, he built a spinning machine from memory. By doing so, he brought industrialization to America.

Which of the following would be the best topic sentence to discuss Samuel Slater’s influence on industrialization?

(A) Slater learned how to operate a spinning machine in Britain.

(B) Slater ran a machine that speeded up cloth production.

(C) Slater helped industrialization spread from Britain to the United States.

(D) Slater broke the law that forbade taking plans out of the country.

The legal dispute over a car between a young woman and her neighbor falls under civil law, which aims to protect individuals' property rights. The woman's claim is complicated by the lack of a written payment agreement, and the title's presence in the neighbor's name usually indicates ownership in the eyes of the law.

Civil law deals with the rights and duties of individuals among themselves. In this case, the source of law is likely a statute, as the state recognizes the owner of a vehicle through the title, an official document. Without the law in place, individuals would risk losing their property without legal recourse, and it might lead to an increase in fraudulent activities. Here, the purpose of law is to protect people's property rights and provide a mechanism for resolving disputes like the one between the young woman and her neighbor.

The young woman could argue that despite the title being in her neighbor's name, there was a verbal contract relating to the payment plan. However, verbal agreements can be difficult to enforce, especially if not witnessed or recorded. The absence of an official, written and signed payment agreement makes this case more challenging. Thus, government intervention by making an exception to the law based on verbal agreement claims could set a complicated precedent. Therefore, usually the person whose name appears on the title is recognized as the owner, as possession and ownership rights are well-established to avoid ambiguity and conflict.

Final answer:

Romans were not generally allowed to take resources from their neighbor's land. However, laws enacted during the Roman Republic did allow soldiers to receive equitable portions of conquered lands. Wealthy Romans also bought or leased land for plantations, often resulting in small farmers losing their properties.

Explanation:

The question pertains to the rights Romans had with regard to property and resources from their neighbor's land. During the expansion of the Roman Republic, an important law was enacted around 350 BCE that limited the amount of land that could be awarded to a single citizen after a military victory, thus ensuring that land distribution was more equitable among plebeian soldiers. This provided a strong incentive to serve in the Roman army, as any soldier could potentially become very rich from participating in a successful campaign.

Furthermore, as Rome conquered new territories, large landowners would buy land from poor farmers or lease public land from the Roman state, turning them into large plantations worked by slaves, which were highly profitable due to the low cost of slave labor. This process, however, often led to small farmers losing their lands to such wealthy landowners. Therefore, outside of the law regarding land awarded after military victories, there is no clear evidence that Romans were allowed to legally take anything from their neighbor's land, given Roman law typically protected private property rights somewhat similarly to modern legal systems.

Final answer:

The Great Schism was primarily caused by differences in language, culture, and authority recognition between the Eastern and Western Churches. The Eastern Church permitted married clergy and held a more collegial view of church governance, while the Western Church practiced clerical celibacy and vested supreme authority in the pope. This division still influences the two distinct branches of Christianity.

Explanation:

The division between the eastern and western Christian churches, known as the Great Schism of 1054, was largely due to differences in language, culture, and ecclesiastical authority. The Western Church, centered in Rome, conducted its services in Latin, enforced celibacy among its clergy, and recognized the pope as the ultimate authority on church matters.

In contrast, the Eastern Church, based in Constantinople, used Greek, allowed its priests to marry, and saw the patriarch as having authority equal to that of the pope. These differences were emphasized and made more pronounced by the reform movements of the time.

Over time, differing interpretations of religious texts and controversies over church leadership further deepened the divide. The Eastern Orthodox Church now comprises various national churches, including Greek and Russian Orthodox, while Western Christianity was entirely Roman Catholic until the Protestant Reformation in the 16th century, which led to the development of numerous Protestant denominations.

The initial split had ripple effects through the centuries, impacting religious practices, church governance, and ultimately leading to separate paths in the evolution of Eastern and Western Christian traditions.

One pivotal moment in this division was when the pope's representative excommunicated the Patriarch of Constantinople, who then excommunicated the pope's envoy in response. This official separation resulted in what are now known as the Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic Churches. Despite the schism, the western Church retained its organizational hierarchy and continued to exert considerable influence across Europe.

Paul Revere went north to warn the militias along the way about the British plans to seize munitions in Concord, Massachusetts.

Paul Revere went so far north before getting on the same path as Dawes in order to warn the militias along the way about the British plans to seize munitions in Concord, Massachusetts. He and other riders from Boston were responsible for spreading the message and alerting the militias, ensuring that they were prepared to meet the British troops. Revere was captured by the British, but his efforts were still crucial in mobilizing the militias and ultimately leading to the skirmishes at Lexington and Concord.

https://brainly.com/question/11526400

#SPJ2