Answer: as the sailers traveled they learned and brought people back and forth. The experiences they had changed them in that they would adopt parts of other cultures and they would spread their ideas.
An example is the use of corn. It was only grown in south America till the travelers came and saw how it fattened up the animals. They took the corn back with them to grow and feed their animals. Some people would eat it for themselves.
Explanation:
The Columbian Exchange resulted in cultural and biological exchanges between the New and Old Worlds, introducing new food, plants, and animals to both sides. This had significant effects on the lifestyles and cultures of these regions, for example, the introduction of maize and potatoes led to population explosions, transforming social structures and cultural developments. The global trade also helped in the diffusion of languages and religions into new territories, shaping their cultural landscapes.
Explanation:The Columbian Exchange, named after Christopher Columbus, refers to the period of cultural and biological exchanges between the New and Old Worlds. New types of food, plants, and animals were introduced to both sides of the Atlantic, which had a dramatic impact on lifestyle and culture.
A clear example of this can be seen in the introduction of maize and potatoes from the Americas to Europe, Asia, and Africa. These hardy, high-yield crops led to a population explosion in these continents, changing social structures and spurring cultural developments. Similarly, the introduction of horses to the Americas by the Europeans transformed Native American tribes, particularly those on the Great Plains, whose lifestyles and cultures became centered around these animals.
Furthermore, the global trade brought about by the Columbian Exchange also influenced cultural advancements like the diffusion of languages (like Spanish and English), and religions (like Christianity), into new territories, further shaping the cultural landscapes of many regions.
Learn more about Columbian Exchange here:https://brainly.com/question/32670515
#SPJ2
15 POINTS
-1883: Pendleton Act passed
-1887: Interstate Commerce Act passed
-1890: Sherman Anti-Trust Act passed
This legislation reflects the government's attempts to
A) enforce the prohibition of alcohol.
B) ban the formations of labor unions.
C) ease racial tensions in the Jim Crow south.
D) regulate business and industry in the late 1800s.
Answer:
yeah its D
Explanation:
This legislation reflects the government's attempts to regulate business and industry in the late 1800s. Hence, option D is correct.
What was industrialization in the late 1800s?The American Industrial Revolution, which began in the late 19th century, served as a catalyst for American economic expansion. The assembly line, telegraph, steam engine, sewing machine, and internal combustion engine were among the technologies that came about as a result of the Industrial Revolution.
In the late 1800s, railroads formed the backbone of the country's industrial economy, opening up the West to development, opening up new markets, and transporting billions of tons of freight throughout the nation.
The abundance of natural resources coal, iron, and oil; a plentiful labor supply; railroads; labor-saving technology advancements new patents; and pro-business government policies are five elements that fueled industrial growth in the late 1800s.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more information about industrialization in the late 1800s, click here
https://brainly.com/question/1317166
#SPJ3
The Pinckney treaty did which of the following?
A: settled disputes between native Americans and European settlers along the Great Lakes
B: temporarily solved disputes between the U.S. and Spain over Florida
C: gave Texas to the United States
D: opened up the west
Answer:
choice b is the correct answer
Explanation:
B is the correct answer
Based on the cases that followed, was the Bakke decision a complete win for supporters or for opponents of affirmative action? Explain your reasoning, referring to at least one of the cases that followed.
The Bakke decision was not a complete win for either supporters or opponents of affirmative action. The decision allowed for the continued use of affirmative action but placed limitations on its implementation.
Explanation:The Bakke decision, made by the US Supreme Court in 1978, was not a complete win for either supporters or opponents of affirmative action. In this case, the Court ruled that while race could be considered as one factor among many in college admissions, the use of racial quotas as employed by the University of California, Davis, was unconstitutional. The Court's decision allowed for the continued use of affirmative action in college admissions but placed limitations on its implementation.
One of the cases that followed the Bakke decision was Grutter v. Bollinger (2003). In this case, the Supreme Court upheld the University of Michigan Law School's affirmative action policy, stating that it served a compelling interest in promoting diversity. The Court emphasized that the policy was narrowly tailored and used a holistic approach to evaluate applicants, taking into consideration various factors, including race.
Learn more about Bakke decision and affirmative action here:https://brainly.com/question/11485890
#SPJ3
The Bakke decision allowed affirmative action to continue but banned explicit racial quotas, an outcome that neither fully supported nor completely opposed the practice. Later cases like Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger further defined these limitations, allowing for race to be considered but not to the extent of imposing quotas.
The Regents of the University of California v. Bakke was a significant case, but not a complete win for either supporters or opponents of affirmative action. The Supreme Court's decision in 1978 allowed for affirmative action to continue but without the use of explicit racial quotas, which the Court found to be a violation of both the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The subsequent Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger cases affirmed the use of race as one of many factors in university admissions, but underscored that policies that result in a quota-like system were unconstitutional. These cases show a nuanced approach to affirmative action, supporting its use to foster diversity but setting clear limitations on how far such policies can go.
how did the russians help north korea
Answer and Explanation:
December 1945
On October 14, Soviet authorities introduced Kim to the North Korean public as a guerrilla hero. In December 1945, at the Moscow Conference, the Soviet Union agreed to a US proposal for a trusteeship over Korea for up to five years in the lead-up to independence.
How did the arts grow under Suleiman?
African masks and textile designs influenced works by Turkish artists.
Ottoman poets used Persian and Arab models to create Turkish poems.
Ottoman painters adapted Chinese styles to depict Turkish landscapes.
Greek statues inspired Ottoman sculptors to carve realistic sculpture.
Answer:
Ottoman poets used Persian and Arab models to create Turkish poems
Explanation:
During the reign of Suleiman the Magnificent, there were lot of changes in the empire, especially when it came to the arts and the cultural development. Suleiman inspired and financed the Turkish artists of all spheres to get creative and to start making artistic treasures for the empire. Some of the things that saw a major upraise was the literature. The Ottoman poets started to use the Persian and the Arab models as their basis, and they started to create unique Turkish poems, resulting in an explosion in the Turkish literature. The Persian and Arab elements can be seen even in the present, as the Turkish literature has kept the style and structure from the period of Suleiman the Magnificent.
Which area represented on the map was a site of a major terrorist attack involving children in 2004?
Answer:
North Ossetia
Explanation:
In 2004, Russia experienced the most devastating terrorist attack in its history. The terrorist attack took place in Beslan, the capital of the autonomous region of North Ossetia, and it was organized and executed by a Chechen terrorist organization. The purpose of the terrorist attack was to revenge the deaths of the Chechen people that lost their lives during the Russo-Chechen wars, so they made a siege of a school in which there were lot of children at that time. The Russian special forced initially tried to negotiate for the hostages, but the terrorists were not letting anyone go, so the special forces were order to get inside and eliminate them all. They did so, and indeed eliminated all terrorists, but the problem was that the total deaths were 330 people, lot of which were civilians, and lot of them children.
What did the Emancipation Proclamation do?
freed slaves in the South
made slavery illegal
freed slaves that fought in the Civil War
allowed former slaves to vote in elections
A is correct answer
Answer:
the answer is A.It freed enslaved workers in Confederate territory.
Explanation:
just took the assignment
why did the south support the idea of nullification
The South supported nullification primarily due to economic distress caused by tariffs they perceived as unfair and out of fear that federal power could extend to attacking the institution of slavery. This lead to the Nullification Crisis, where South Carolina took drastic action to maintain their interests against what they saw as federal overreach.
Explanation:The South supported the idea of nullification due to a combination of economic hardships and the protection of slavery. The resentment of the tariff and its link to federal power illustrated that if the federal government could enact such tariffs, it might also take action against other southern interests, including slavery. This fear was particularly felt by wealthy slaveholders who were a minority in the United States. Figures like James Hamilton and John C. Calhoun promoted the idea of nullification and prepared to resist any federal actions they deemed against their interests.
In South Carolina, this led to the election of a state legislature that supported a convention to discuss nullifying the Tariffs of 1828 and 1832. Their subsequent ordinance set a precedent that they hoped other states would follow, thus countering the federal government's authority and protecting their regional interests. Despite President Jackson's measures to reinforce federal authority and offer tariff concessions, South Carolina proceeded with its nullification, further intensifying the standoff between federal power and state sovereignty.
The Nullification Crisis revealed key tensions in American democracy, including sectional divides, differing economic interests, and interpretations of the Constitution, which foreshadowed the national conflicts leading up to the Civil War.
Final answer:
The South's support for nullification was tied to fears of federal power and protection of slavery interests, with South Carolina leading the charge and figures like John C. Calhoun advocating for states' rights. Andrew Jackson opposed nullification, viewing it as a threat to the Union, leading to a conflict resolved by compromise.
Explanation:
The concept of nullification was supported by the South primarily due to fears over federal overreach, which could threaten the institution of slavery. The enactment of the Tariff of 1828 and subsequent tariffs sounded alarms for many Southerners, who saw the tariffs as a demonstration of the federal government's power over regional interests. Wealthy slaveholders, who formed a ruling minority, felt particularly threatened that their interests were at risk, leading to an association between nullification and the protection of slave-based economic systems.
South Carolina became the epicenter of nullification when they passed an ordinance declaring the tariffs of 1828 and 1832 null and void within the state. Prominent figures such as John C. Calhoun played a crucial role in formulating the defense for nullification. However, the crisis peaked with President Andrew Jackson's firm opposition to the idea, which he viewed as a threat to the Union.
The political strife escalated until a compromise lowered the tariff rates and the imminent crisis faded. Throughout the period, nullification was seen as a tool for an elite minority to resist what they perceived as unfair dominance by a democratic majority, and a safeguard to protect the institution of slavery against potential northern alliance.
Which of the following statements describes
Vikings?
They targeted markets
during raids.
They targeted churches and
monasteries during raids.
They targeted universities
during raids.
They targeted museums and
governmental houses during
raids.
it's either a or b but I mainly think a
Answer:
They targeted churches and monasteries during raids.
Explanation:
Vikings is the main name given to the members of the Nordic peoples originating in Scandinavia, famous for their incursions and looting in Europe. Depending on the context and the interpretation of the author, the name can be used to refer to the raiders of this origin or to their countries of origin. Metonymy has led to the name is still used today in a colloquial way to refer to the Scandinavian countries. His language was the old Norse.
While there are vague references to Germanic peoples of the Baltic Sea and Scandinavia in Roman sources, their attacks and their appearance on the European political scene become relevant with the sacking of the monastery of Lindisfarne (793) in the north of Great Britain, to which they soon followed attacks to other monasteries. The annals and chronicles of the next two centuries are replete with frightening stories. Their violent actions terrified the old communities, which, though accustomed to war, had no way of foreseeing when there would be a raid and suffered from a lack of strong powers at the beginning of the Middle Ages. These attacks added to those of the Hungarians and Avars, to the pressure of Slavic peoples in Eastern Europe and to the Arabs in the South were both the cause and consequence of a period of instability that favored the political decentralization of feudalism.
How many slaves lived in America in 1820?
In 1820, the estimated number of slaves living in America was approximately 1.5 million.
Slavery was deeply ingrained in the social fabric of the country at that time, particularly in the southern states where agricultural production heavily relied on slave labor. The enslavement of African Americans was a brutal and dehumanizing practice, denying them their basic human rights and subjecting them to forced labor and inhumane treatment.
Slavery was a contentious issue that eventually led to the American Civil War and the subsequent emancipation of slaves through the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863. The legacy of this dark period in American history continues to shape societal discussions around racial inequality and social justice.
To know more about Civil War visit:
https://brainly.com/question/11874600
#SPJ6
In 1820, the number of slaves in America was part of an increasing trend from the 1800 census, which recorded nearly 900,000 enslaved individuals. The movement of slaves was a significant internal migration during the decades leading up to the Civil War.
The census of 1800 had already recorded over one million African Americans, of which nearly 900,000 were enslaved. By the subsequent decades, this number continued to increase. As noted in historical records, such as the LibreTexts, during each of the decades between 1820 and 1860, roughly 200,000 people were sold and relocated due to the slave trade in the South, indicating the frequency and scale of this forced internal migration. While exact numbers for 1820 are not directly stated, it can be extrapolated from the known data that the number of slaves would have increased from the 1800 count, reflecting the broader trend of an increasing slave population leading up to the Civil War.
Which of these are duties of the SEC? Check all that apply.
overseeing the actions of brokers and financial advisers
protecting businesses from consumer corruption
ensuring the security and fairness of mutual funds and exchanges
bringing suits against businesses that are not following securities laws
regulating prices to ensure fair competition
Answer:
answer 1,3,4
Explanation:
The duties of the SEC include: (1) Overseeing the actions of brokers and financial advisers. (2) Ensuring the security and fairness of mutual funds and exchanges. (3) Bringing suits against businesses that are not following securities laws
The duties of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) encompass several key areas in financial regulation and oversight. The SEC is charged with overseeing the actions of brokers, dealers, and financial advisers to ensure their compliance with the law.
It is also responsible for ensuring the security and fairness of mutual funds and exchanges, thereby protecting investors' interests. Additionally, the SEC has the authority to bring suits against businesses that are not following securities laws, acting as a law enforcement agency in the financial sector.
However, the SEC does not have the role of regulating prices to ensure fair competition nor does it have a duty to protect businesses from consumer corruption; these fall under the jurisdiction of other regulatory bodies and laws, such as the Federal Trade Commission and antitrust laws.
in the early 1800s female reformers focused on these issues
Answer:
Women's right to vote .
Answer: Suffrage, temperance, unionizing and abolition of slavery.
Explanation: It is a mistake to think women were mostly involved in suffrage. Women activists in the temperance movement, abolition and in forming unions pre-date the earliest suffrage cries. In fact, many male abolitionists were also supporters of women's suffrage.
In the 1920s, mass media helped popularize which of these sports heroes
Answer:
During the 1920s, many athletes were popularized, just like Hollywood legends. These athletes included Jack Dempsey, Johnny Weissmuller, Helen Wills, "Red" Grange, Gertrude Ederle, Joe Lewis, Satchel Paige, and Babe Ruth.
Explanation:
Babe Ruth, also known as the Sultan of Swat, became the most celebrated sports hero of the 1920s through the influence of mass media. His extraordinary baseball talent and charismatic personality made him a national symbol and greatly popularized baseball. The correct answer is option Babe Ruth.
In the 1920s, mass media, particularly radio and newspapers, played a pivotal role in popularizing sports heroes and turning them into household names. The most iconic among them was Babe Ruth, a baseball legend who played for the New York Yankees. His prowess at hitting home runs earned him a reputation that far exceeded the sport, with nicknames like the Sultan of Swat and Colossus of Clout. He not only brought excitement into the game with his record-breaking performances, like hitting sixty home runs in 1927, but also transformed baseball into a high-scoring spectacle. His notoriety and larger-than-life personality were broadcast into homes across America, making him a national hero and a symbol of the United States' sporting culture.
The graph shows the population of European cities between 100 CE and 1000 CE. What does the graph indicate about the change in urban populations during this time?
Answer:
I would go with B, "populations declined in urban areas"
Explanation:
For all 3, the urban population is much greater in 100 CE than 1000 CE. I find the graphs to be set up in a poor way and you'd expect them to have grown, so forgive me if I'm wrong.
Answer:
Populations decline in urban areas
Explanation:
As you can see in the graph over the course of those 9 centuries the population decline, in different measurements in the three metropolis that we are seeing in Rome, the population became almost 1/20 of that of the first cenury compared with the population of 10 centuries after that, in other areas, like london and paris the declining of the population was less drastic but still observed a decline on urban population.
Why did native Americans and French have to deal with each other on equal terms
The main reason is that they did not try to change the Natives. They also did not compete with the Natives for land. When the French first came to the Americas in the 1530s and 1540s to engage in seasonal fur trading, they immediately established strong trading ties with the local Natives they found there. The Natives already dealt extensively in furs.
The French quickly discovered they could go back to France in the winter months with ships laden with furs they had purchased from the Natives with European wares, such as metal cooking pots, weapons, horses, and other goods not accessible to the Natives at that time. The Natives also accompanied the French on hunting parties and showed them where the good fur animals could be found. The French made it a point to learn the Native languages and ways, and established good relations that were based on equality with all of the tribes in the area.
The French began to stay year-round in the early 1600s, establishing their first permanent settlement at Quebec in 1608, one year after the English founded Jamestown in Virginia. They did not displace any Natives in the establishment of their settlement and continued to work closely with them in the fur trade. They respected Native territories, their ways, and treated them as the human beings they were. The Natives, in turn, treated the French as trusted friends. More intermarriages took place between French settlers and Native Americans than with any other European group.
This close alliance, which was based on mutual respect and good treatment from both sides, led the Natives to side with the French in their conflicts with the English settlers that came later in the 1600s and into the mid-1700s. Relations between the Natives and the English were not nearly as good.
The English treated the Natives as inferior, believed they stood in the way of their God-given right to the land in America and tried to subject the Natives to their laws as they established their colonies. The Spanish didn’t have any better relations with the Natives, as they tried to enslave them when they first came to America, and later established missions where they tried to force them to convert from their traditional religions to Catholicism. The Natives did not appreciate any of this.
The key to the friendly relations the French enjoyed with the Natives was all in the way they treated them when they first encountered them, and how they continued to treat them afterward. As long as the French maintained settlements in America, they enjoyed excellent relations with each other. For those who have early American French ancestry, or French settler ancestors who married Native Americans, the vast majority of those records can be found in the provincial archives of Quebec (some records there might lead back to France if the settler returned there with his Native American bride).
These records provide a fascinating look at relations between Natives and Europeans and show just how different things could have been if all the European people who came to America had been as progressive in their treatment of the Natives as the French were.
The French and Native Americans dealt with each other on equal terms due to mutual dependencies in trade, alliances, and cultural exchange. The French relied on Native American assistance for survival and valuable fur trade, while Native Americans also depended on French for European goods.
Explanation:The Native Americans and the French had to deal with each other on equal terms primarily due to the mutual dependencies they developed in the realms of trade, alliances, and cultural exchange. In the 17th and 18th centuries, French colonizers were significantly outnumbered by Native Americans, therefore, they heavily relied on local assistance to survive. Furthermore, the French valued the fur trade, for which Native American expertise in hunting was invaluable.
On another hand, Native Americans also relied on the French for European goods such as firearms, iron tools, and woolen clothes. These exchanges fostered a sense of equality and mutual understanding, unlike in other colonies where European colonizers outweighed local populations and were often intent on land acquisition and forced labor.
Learn more about French and Native American relations here:https://brainly.com/question/33805413
#SPJ11
The Urge to explore was increased by all the factors below except:
1. The organization of the feudal system
2. New ideas brought home by the Crusaders
3. Stories of wealth told by the polos
4. Prince Henry’s navigation school
the answer is 2 i think
Answer:
The answer is the organization of the feudal systems. i know this because i have the answer key!!
Explanation:
Who served as Mayor of Atlanta a member of the US house of representatives, and ambassador to the United States?
Maynard Jackson
Andrew Young
Benjamin Mays
Martin Luther King Jr
Answer:
Andrew Young
Explanation:
Both Maynard Jackson and Andrew Young served as
state senator.
mayor of Atlanta.
mayor of Savannah.
governor of Georgia.
What is frequently associated with rapid urbanization?
transportation improvements
housing shortages
adequate infrastructure
decrease in crime
Answer:
housing shortages
Explanation:
The housing shortages and the rapid urbanization go hand by hand. When people move in big numbers toward certain place, usually a larger city, in order to have a better life, they are actually surplus when taken in consideration the amount of people the city can accommodate. This results in housing shortage, and the demand for flats and houses skyrockets. Because of this, rapid urbanization takes place so that the demand is satisfied, so the city expands very quickly. A problem that often occurs with the rapid urbanization though is that it is not usually wall planned, performed in a rush, and the housing is not of good quality.
Answer: housing shortages
Explanation: It makes sense for this answer to be correct and it also takes time to build houses, so if a lot of people are coming in to fill the empty houses, workers have to try to build houses double and triple time to keep up.
Which statement about the results of the Crusades is not true?
Question options:
The Holy Land remained firmly under the control of Christian Crusaders.
Tensions between Jews and Christians increased because Crusader armies had slaughtered Jews.
Muslims and Christians blamed each other for the series of bitter wars.
Europeans learned about science and medicine from the Islamic world.
Answer:
the other person is right it is a
Explanation:
What is labor in economics? A. Labor is not considered a part of economics. B. Labor is one of the three resources of production, like land or capital. C. Labor is affected by economics, but is outside economic theory. D. Labor is the only real resource of production.
Answer:
B. Labor is one of the three resources of production, like land or capital.
Explanation:
The factors of production are the goods or services that are used to produce more goods or services. The production factors currently tend to be: land (natural resources), work (time that people spend on production), capital (durable goods used to manufacture other goods or services) and technology (knowledge and applied techniques that allow the modification of the The last factor was recently included).
Which practice is most likely to have been supported by conservatives in Europe in the 1800s? A. All citizens were granted voting rights and allowed to apply for government jobs. B. A monarch made key political decisions based on input from advisors. C. The people elected the national leaders. D. National leaders and laws relied on legitimacy from the people.
Hello there!
The answer for your question would be “B” have a great day!
Answer:
a monarch made key political decisions based on input from advisors.
Explanation:
What effect did the passing of the Embargo Act of 1807 by Jefferson have upon the United States?
American president Thomas Jefferson (Democratic-‐Republican party) led Congress to pass the Embargo Act of 1807. Effects on American shipping and markets: Agricultural prices and earnings fell. Shipping-related industries were devastated.
It was to help ships form being captured in foreign ports but it didn’t help and it eventually led to the war
Who were the leaders of the armies of the battle of fort necessity?
Answer: George Washington led the British/ American forces along with James Mackay.. the French forces were led by Louis Coulon de Villiers
Explanation:
Final answer:
The Battle of Fort Necessity was led by George Washington on the British side and Captain Louis Coulon de Villiers on the French side, resulting in Washington's surrender.
Explanation:
The Battle of Fort Necessity was an early conflict in the French and Indian War, involving the forces of Britain and France, along with their respective Native American allies. On the British side, the young George Washington, an officer in the Virginia colonial militia, was in command at Fort Necessity. As a hastily constructed stronghold, the fort was besieged and eventually surrendered to French and Native American forces.
The French were led by Captain Louis Coulon de Villiers, who was successful in forcing Washington's surrender. This engagement marked a prelude to the wider and more prolonged conflicts that would ensue between Britain and France for control of North America.
Members of which groups United to form the new Republican Party and what was their purpose
Answer:
Abolitionists, Ex-Free Soil Party Members, Ex-Know Nothing Party members
Explanation:
The parties formed to oppose the Kansas-Nebraska Act.
Which U.S. president brokered the MOST notable diplomatic achievement for peace in the Middle East to date?
A) Jimmy Carter
B) Ronald Reagan
C) George W. Bush
D) George H.W. Bush
Answer:
A) Jimmy Carter
Explanation:
Final answer:
Jimmy Carter is the U.S. president who brokered the most notable peace achievement in the Middle East. Correct option is A.
Explanation:
The U.S. president who brokered the most notable diplomatic achievement for peace in the Middle East to date is Jimmy Carter.
Carter facilitated the negotiations between Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin and Egyptian President Anwar Sadat at the Camp David presidential retreat in Maryland.
The negotiations resulted in the signing of the Camp David Accords in 1978, which led to the historic peace treaty between Egypt and Israel in 1979.
“It is my great desire to reform my subjects, and yet I am ashamed to confess that I am unable to reform myself. ” from Peter the Great
What does he mean?
He wanted himself to change as much as he wanted others to change as well, but he saw that it was a very difficult task to change oneself, and by seeing that, he understood the challenges he would face when changing the people.
In what way does "A Modest Proposal" fit the definition of satire? A. It hides its radical solution to the problem of poverty inside a more B. It uses humor to criticize the Irish poor for taking advantage of C. It presents an argument for treating children like livestock, which D. It brings attention to the problem of poverty in Ireland and hints at practical solution. welfare programs. the reader isn't meant to take seriously a solution.
Answer:
C. It presents an argument for treating children like livestock, which the reader isn't meant to take seriously a solution.
Explanation:
Satire is the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues.
In a Modest Proposal Swift suggests a ridiculous and exaggerated way to solve the lack of food which is why it is satire.
The answer is def not D or B. If it is not C then it is A.
This is my best guess so I hope it helped!
Answer:
Option C. "A Modest Proposal" fits the definition of satire as it presents an argument for treating children like livestock, which the reader isn't meant to take seriously.
Explanation:
Jonathan Swift's "A Modest Proposal" is a satirical essay in which the author suggests that the poor families of Ireland should over-feed their children so that they can sell them as livestock to the rich land owners.
It is a satire as Swift uses humor, irony and exaggeration to make his point clear, in this case to make a criticism against the rich land owners that keep getting richer while the Irish families keep on getting poorer. it is clear that the author does not seriously believe that selling kids as livestock is an optimal solution to the problem, rather than he is using the exaggerated concept as a way to deliver his message.
What was one result of the spread of Buddhism?
Answer: Many sects of Buddhism have developed and the religion has been combined with others.
It has been combined with many Asian religions, such as Confucianism and Taoism.
The others are false: Christianity is the most commonly practiced religion and the caste system in India was not inspired by Buddhism
Read more on Brainly.com - https://brainly.com/question/990488#readmore
Explanation:
One result of the spread of Buddhism was the establishment of new trade routes across Asia. Buddhism also influenced the development of art and architecture, leading to the creation of magnificent temples and statues. Additionally, the spread of Buddhism contributed to the rise of new kingdoms and empires.
Explanation:One result of the spread of Buddhism was the establishment of new trade routes across Asia. As Buddhism spread, so did merchants and pilgrims seeking to support and learn from this new religion. These trade routes, such as the Silk Road, not only facilitated the exchange of goods but also fostered cultural exchange and the spread of ideas.
Another result of the spread of Buddhism was the development of new forms of art and architecture. Buddhist beliefs and symbols influenced the creation of magnificent temples, statues, and cave paintings, showcasing the spiritual and artistic achievements of Buddhist societies.
Lastly, the spread of Buddhism led to the rise of new kingdoms and empires. As Buddhism gained popularity, rulers and governments embraced the religion to legitimize their power and gain the support of their subjects. This resulted in the establishment of Buddhist states and the integration of Buddhist principles into legal and social systems.
Learn more about Results of the spread of Buddhism here:https://brainly.com/question/38089781
#SPJ6
what do child labor, railroad strikes, socialism, and the rise of labor unions ALL have in common
They all share in common that each involves unfair amounts of labor for people. Socialism involves manual labor; child labor is non stop work for young and hungry kids; Et Cetera. Not only that, but in almost all of them the people being forced to work were treated poorly.
I hope this helps.
Final answer:
Child labor, railroad strikes, socialism, and labor unions are interconnected by the struggle against industrial capitalism's abuses and the effort to secure better working conditions, fair wages, and a fairer society. Socialism influenced the development of labor unions, which used collective bargaining and strikes to further workers' rights. Key labor actions and subsequent reforms have shaped the labor movement and its role in society.
Explanation:
Child labor, railroad strikes, socialism, and the rise of labor unions are all linked by their roots in the Industrial Revolution and the subsequent labor movement. These phenomena are connected by a shared theme of workers' struggle against the abuses of industrial capitalism. They represent various aspects of the fight for improved labor conditions, fair wages, and a more equitable society—a struggle often marked by a tension between workers and capitalists, and a debate over the role of government in rectifying social inequities. Socialism emerged as a political ideology that advocated for governmental control of the means of production to ensure workers' rights and fair distribution of resources. This ideology played a significant role in the development of labor unions, as seen in the actions of union leaders like Eugene Debs and organizations such as the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW). Labor unions sought to empower workers through collective bargaining and strikes, and their establishment was catalyzed by numerous labor actions, including the Great Railway Strike of 1877 and the Homestead Steel Strike of 1892. Child labor and railroad strikes highlighted the dire need for reform in labor laws and working conditions. Over time, public awareness and outcry against the exploitative practices of industries led to governmental action, setting the stage for what would become a legalized and organized labor movement. Despite setbacks such as the Pullman Strike, labor advocates continued to push for change, influencing public opinion and policy.
What is the fundamental plan of operation for a government
The fundamental plan of operation for a government is typically set out in a constitution, which is a framework that establishes government structure, limits its powers, and protects individual rights. The constitution includes systems like constitutionalism to ensure adherence to the rule of law, limited government, and individualism. For example, the U.S. Constitution has been successfully guiding the nation’s governance for over 227 years with limited amendments.
Explanation:Fundamental Plan of Government Operation
The fundamental plan of operation for a government is typically embodied in a constitution, which serves as a framework or blueprint that outlines the basic principles of governance, structures the branches of government, and details their duties. A constitution limits government power to ensure protection of individual liberties, and is designed to be more challenging to amend than ordinary laws. The U.S. Constitution, for instance, outlines the general purposes of government, such as providing for the common defense, promoting general welfare, and securing the blessings of liberty to its citizens.
Furthermore, constitutions often establish a system of constitutionalism, which incorporates three core elements: the rule of law, a limited government, and protection of individual rights. This system ensures that the government operates under a set of rules that protect the fundamental rights of its citizens. Additionally, to address common interests of the nation such as national defense and monetary control, powers are distributed between the national government and other levels, like states and localities, as seen in the U.S. with its federal structure.
The U.S. Constitution has only been formally amended 27 times, with the first ten amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, established to guarantee essential freedoms to the American people. These amendments and the original content of the Constitution together reflect the underlying principles crafted by the Founding Fathers, aiming to restrict government powers and preserve individual liberties. The key understanding is that a constitutional framework is enacted with the intent to strategize long-term stability and protection of the nation and its citizens.