Americans developed a widespread fear of Communist infiltration into the American government or of an anarchist or communist revolution that could overthrow the prevailing capitalist order in the United States by imposing a Communist dictatorship, just as in the USSR. This diffuse dread gave way to aggressive investigations and the arrest of people ideologically suspicious or otherwise associated with communist or socialist movements. At that moment, the citizens would become distrustful and afraid of being denounced as a communist sympathizer because that would imply in being persecuted by the government and having their civic guarantees withdrawn.
The fear of the Soviet Union and communism shaped American society, fueling the Second Red Scare and Lavender Scare, affecting civil liberties, and driving military spending and propaganda. These fears led to discrimination and targeted individuals and groups within American culture and politics.
This period saw the onset of the Second Red Scare, where individuals suspected of Communist affiliations faced severe scrutiny and oftentimes unjust persecution. As the United States entered an arms race against the Soviet Union, the threat of nuclear war influenced American foreign policy, and the need to maintain superiority led to significant investments in military technology, shaping the national budget and economy.
During this time, there was also a significant impact on civil liberties as the Lavender Scare implicated and targeted homosexuals, alleging that their sexual orientation made them security risks. This discrimination had lasting effects on the Gay Rights Movement. In popular culture, the fear of communism infiltrated various aspects, from films to educational materials, often portraying the Soviet Union as an oppressive regime.
The American government approached these fears with heavy propaganda and policies aimed to root out communist influence, sometimes at the expense of civil liberties and social cohesion. The panic instilled by the fear of communist espionage and influence also led to actions that infringed upon the civil rights of many Americans, as seen in the activities of the House Un-American Activities Committee.
Which colony provided the basis for the Declarations and Resolves?
Massachusetts
Philadelphia
Rhode Island
New York
The correct answer is A. Massachusetts
Explanation:
The Declarations and Resolves was an official document written in 1774 by the colonies in which the colonies stated a bill of rights but also expressed the objections and grievances against the Intolerable Acts that were different acts from the British Parliament in response to punish those that opposed the changes in taxation applied in 1774. The basis of this document was mainly proposed by the Massachusetts colony as it was this colony the one that opposed the taxation system and therefore the one that was directly punished by the British parliament with the Intolerable Acts, situation that led to delegates of the Massachusetts colony to meet with delegates of other colonies and create the document. Therefore, the colony that provided the basis for the Declarations and Resolvers was Massachusetts.
The Massachusetts colony played a central role in the creation of the Declarations and Resolves, a response by the First Continental Congress to unfair British colonial policies.
Explanation:The Massachusetts colony provided the basis for the Declarations and Resolves. This significant historical document, also known as the Declaration of Colonial Rights, was a statement adopted by the First Continental Congress in 1774 in response to harsh British Colonial policies. The Massachusetts colony, deeply impacted by these policies, notably the Intolerable Acts, played a major role in the production of this document
Learn more about Declarations and Resolveshttps://brainly.com/question/12881091
#SPJ6
Who was the first person to fly solo across the Atlantic Ocean?
Orville Wright
Jim Thorpe
Charlie Chaplin
Charles Lindbergh
Answer:
Charles Lindbergh
Answer:
Charles Lindbergh "Lucky Lindy"
Ida Tarbell wrote publicly about
the need for better housing in rural America
the sinister business practices of Standard Oil
the need for a national temperance movement
the women’s suffrage cause in the American West
Answer:
The sinister business practices of Standard Oil.
Explanation:
She was an American writer and investigative journalist in the late 19th and early 20th century. She is well known for her 1904 book "The History of the Standard Oil Company". In the book, she investigates the company owned by Rockefeller and was an example for many other journalists to write about the attempts to gain monopolies in various industries.
Her work contributed to the dissolution of the Standard Oil monopoly in 1911 after the Supreme Court of the United States found the company guilty of having violated the Sherman antitrust act.
I hope this answer helps you.
Ida Tarbell was a journalist who wrote exposing the business practices of Standard Oil. Her work played a role in the enactment of U.S. antitrust laws.
Explanation:Ida Tarbell was a famous American journalist who is best known for her investigative journalism. The focus of the writings was on the business practices of Standard Oil. Her exposure of the monopolistic tactics employed by Standard Oil played a significant role in the enactment of antitrust laws in the U.S. She did not primarily write about the need for better rural housing, the temperance movement, or the women’s suffrage cause, those may have been societal issues of her time.
Learn more about Ida Tarbell here:https://brainly.com/question/8448596
#SPJ6
Which of the following is not a characteristic of the Second Great Awakening?
greater emphasis on nature
greater emphasis on religious education of children
greater church attendance
belief in the possibility of a better world
Answer:
Greater emphasis on nature
Explanation:
The Second Great Awakening was a movement that happened around the 1800s that caused great evangelical Protestantism revival. Baptists and Methodists were the main religions that participated in this movement, they worked together to take the religion around the country.
These religions emphasized work ethic, frugality, and temperance, they believed that individuals were responsible for amending their lives. They also expanded the education of children emphasizing on religion by publishing Christian literature.
The Second Great Awakening emphasized religious education, increased church attendance, and the possibility of a better world. However, a greater emphasis on nature was not a characteristic of this movement.
Explanation:The Second Great Awakening was a Protestant religious revival during the early 19th century in the United States. It placed a strong emphasis on the religious education of children, church attendance was significantly increased, and there was an overall belief in the possibility of a better world through Christian reform. However, a greater emphasis on nature is not characteristic of the Second Great Awakening; this trait is more associated with the Romanticism or Transcendentalism movements.
Learn more about Second Great Awakening here:https://brainly.com/question/31610836
#SPJ3
What brought the majority of Chinese immigrants to the U.S.?gold
work opportunities on the railroads
the Homestead Act
Chinese benevolent associations
Answer:
A. Gold
Explanation:
After the Civil War, a rather big number of Chinese people emigrated to the United States in the middle of the California gold rush that took place during 1849 and 1882. On one side, most of these people emigrated to become U.S. citizens, on the other, some worked temporarily and came back home. As it was mentioned, they were initially captivated to travel to the U.S. by the gold rush in California.
Why were the Midway Islands important to American expansion?
The Midway Islands are located in central Pacific Oceans. These Islands were important because it was a stop on the route from San Francisco to Manila and also it was important in the military since the US began to work on an air and submarine base there.
During WWII the Islands were very important because their location was strategic in the war against Japan.
What was the actual result of Jackson’s policy of “rotation in office”?
an end to corruption in Washington
a replacement of Adams’s political loyalists with Jackson’s political loyalists
the filling of government posts with officials the people chose themselves
the creation of the Kitchen Cabinet
Answer:
A replacement of Adams's political loyalists with Jackson's political loyalists
Explanation:
President Andrew Jackson invoked the rotation in federal office as a principle, he defended that “no one man has any more intrinsic right to office than another”. But the actual result of this policy was that he cleansed the federal civil service from John Quincy Adam’s appointees and replaced them for his own.
This rotation occurred in many places, including civil servants in the states and communities and land offices.
what was the effect of Austria-Hungary's annexation of Bosnia and Herzegovina?
a.) the withdrawal of Russia's support of Serbia
b.) the assassination of Austria's heir to the throne
c.) a compromise between Serbia and Austria-Hungary
d.) a Serbian declaration of war on Austria-Hungary
Answer:
Explanation:
The Bosnian Crisis (1908-1909) involved the annexation by the Austro-Hungarian Empire of the balkan regions known as Bosnia and Herzegovina, which at the time were officially part of the Ottoman Turkish Empire. The Annexation Crisis began on October 5, 1908, when Bulgaria declared its independence followed by the announcement by Austria-Hungary on October 6, 1908, that it was annexing Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Ottoman Empire protested this loss of its land, and Russia, Britain, Italy, Serbia, Montenegro, and France, and Germany all became involved in this crisis.
Answer:
The answer is B.Explanation:
Just got it right on the test.
On what grounds did Dred Scott sue for freedom?
the inherent inhumanity of slavery
the cruelty of his master
the fact that he had lived in free states
the fact that his family would be torn apart
Answer:
He sued on the grounds that he had once lived in a free territory.
Dred Scott sued for freedom on the grounds of having lived in free states, but the Supreme Court ruled against him in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case.
Explanation:Dred Scott sued for freedom on the grounds that he had lived in free states. He argued that by residing in these states, he should be considered a free man. However, the Supreme Court ruled against him in the landmark case of Dred Scott v. Sandford, stating that as a slave, Scott was not a citizen and therefore did not have the right to sue in federal court for his freedom. The court's decision also affirmed the constitutionality of slavery and stated that Congress could not prohibit the expansion of slavery into the territories.
Learn more about Dred Scott's lawsuit for freedom here:https://brainly.com/question/3432565
#SPJ6
How did George Washington’s military tactics help him to achieve success?
Answer:
One of the tactics was the Reasoning.
Explanation:
Mr. George Washington was a disciplined army officer. He ability and analytical strategy were determined at his battles.
Most the authors have commented about this subject that his analytical reasoning style helped to win wars.
George Washington is one of the hero of America History.
The disc jockey who popularized rock and roll was ________.
Bill Haley
Elvis Presley
Alan Freed
Ed Sullivan
Answer:
Definitely was Mr. Alan Freed.
Explanation:
Mr. Alan Freed was considerate as one of the most important popularized the Rock and Roll during the 50s.
From popularizing the R&B records that did become the foundation of rock to planning the first rock and roll concert, he was the tireless promoter of the genre.
According to treaties signed in 1818 and 1827, with which country did the United States jointly occupy Oregon?
Great Britain
Spain
Mexico
France
Answer:
According to treaties signed in 1818 and 1827, the United States jointly occupied Oregon with Great Britain.
Explanation:
The territory of Oregon was originally claimed by Great Britain, France, Russia and Spain; the Spanish claim was resumed as of 1819 by the United States. The extension of the area claimed was imprecise at first, evolving over decades in the borders established in the 1818 treaty between British and Americans.
The British claimed the entire Oregon territory, that is, they carried their claim to the south to the 42nd parallel north, which had been the limit agreed in 1819 between Spain and the United States in the Adams-Onis Treaty. The dispute between Great Britain and the United States was resolved peacefully, and until 1846 the United Kingdom -in factual, England itself- and the United States, through the Anglo-American Convention of 1818, exercised a condominium over the entire Territory of Oregon, also ensuring the inhibition of possible Mexican or Russian claims.
All the following were strengths of the Confederacy except ________.
the ability to wage a defensive war
shorter supply lines
the resources of the Upper South states
a strong navy
I'd say the first one. The ability to wage a defensive war.
All the following were strengths of the Confederacy except a strong navy. Because they have the ability to wage a defensive war, shorter supply lines, the resources of the Upper South states. The correct option is (D).
What do you mean by the Confederacy?A circumstance in which states or individuals band together for a specific goal, frequently one of politics or trade, or a group so constituted. the Confederacy, a coalition of southern states that fought in the American Civil War to secede from the Union and maintain slavery.
The military land force of the Confederate States of America was known as the Confederate States Army, often known as the Confederate Army or the Southern Army.
The principal Confederate forces, General Robert E. Lee's Army of Northern Virginia, and the Army of Tennessee's relics.
Therefore, all the following were strengths of the Confederacy except a strong navy. Because they have the ability to wage a defensive war, shorter supply lines, the resources of the Upper South states.
To know more about the Confederacy, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3806049
#SPJ2
98 points question again!!!!!!!!
What is the state of Michigan doing to fix the problem of purple loosestrifes?
I need a source ( from where did you get the answer)
Answer:
In contrast, the biological controls are self-sustaining, inexpensive and very effective once established. Biological control could be used on thousands of golf course acres, improving their biodiversity and quality as wildlife habitat. In the process, the golf industry will be shown to be leaders in an environmental stewardship program of benefit not only to the lands they manage but also to the watersheds in which they exist.
Explanation:
this is what i got, if it helps marks brainliest please :)
Which of the following was not one of Franklin’s thirteen virtues?
sincerity
temperance
mercy
tranquility
Answer:
Mercy was not one of Franklin's thirteen virtues.
Explanation:
In 1726, at the age of 20, Franklin resolved to always do the right thing and avoid getting out of this way. To achieve his goal, Franklin proposed a list of 13 virtues that he always strived to live.
Franklin developed his list of 13 virtues based on the moral virtues he had reached through his readings. In addition, he wrote a few words about each of the virtues to clarify the meaning he gave each one.
This is the list of the 13 virtues to which Franklin personally committed: Temperance, Silence, Order, Resolution, Frugality, Industry, Sincerity, Justice, Moderation, Cleanliness, Tranquility, Chastity and Humility.
Answer:
Mercy was not one of Franklin's thirteen virtues.
Explanation:
In 1726, at the age of 20, Franklin resolved to always do the right thing and avoid getting out of this way. To achieve his goal, Franklin proposed a list of 13 virtues that he always strived to live.Franklin developed his list of 13 virtues based on the moral virtues he had reached through his readings. In addition, he wrote a few words about each of the virtues to clarify the meaning he gave each one.This is the list of the 13 virtues to which Franklin personally committed: Temperance, Silence, Order, Resolution, Frugality, Industry, Sincerity, Justice, Moderation, Cleanliness, Tranquility, Chastity and Humility.
Why was the Mongol’s invasion’s effect on Hungary different from the invasion’s effect on Russia?
Answer:
Reports of the Mongol attacks terrified Europe. The Mongols increased their empire using swift and decisive attacks with an armed and disciplined cavalry. They wiped out the populations of some entire towns that resisted—as was their usual policy—depopulating some regions and confiscating the crops and livestock from others. This type of total warfare spread panic even among Europeans not directly affected by the Mongol onslaught and sent refugees fleeing westward.
Explanation:
The impact of the Mongol invasion was different for Hungary and Russia due to the Mongols' brief but brutal occupation of Hungary and the extended subjugation and political restructuring in Russia. Hungary eventually recovered, while Russia became a vassal to the Golden Horde, affecting its historical trajectory.
The Mongol invasion of Europe in 1241 had a devastating impact on Hungary, culminating in the Battle of Mohi, where the Hungarian army was annihilated. The Mongols slaughtered a significant portion of the population and left the kingdom vulnerable. On the other hand, the impact on Russia was different because the Mongols exploited the existing political fragmentation to conquer and subjugate the Russian city-states, leaving a lasting influence that shifted power to Moscow. The prince of Muscovy, who aligned with the Mongols, played a key role as an intermediary, enhancing Moscow's prominence over historic centers like Kiev.
While in Hungary the invasion was brutal but brief due to the Mongols' withdrawal following Ögedei Khan's death, in Russia the Mongol rule established the Golden Horde, which resulted in long-term vassalage. This divergence partly stemmed from Hungary's ability to recover and remain independent, compared to the extended period of subjugation that Russia experienced under Mongol rule, which some historians suggest impeded Russia's modernization compared to other European nations.
Which of the following was a cause of the British National Debt in 1763?
drought in Great Britain
the French and Indian War
the continued British military presence in the American colonies
both B and C
Final answer:
The British National Debt in 1763 was largely due to the expense of the French and Indian War and the costs of maintaining a military presence in the American colonies afterward.
Explanation:
Causes of British National Debt in 1763
One of the major causes of the British National Debt in 1763 was the French and Indian War (also known as the Seven Years' War). This conflict nearly doubled Britain's national debt from £75 million to £133 million. The heavy costs of maintaining a military presence in the American colonies following the war contributed further to the financial burden. It is clear that 'B. the French and Indian War' and 'C. the continued British military presence in the American colonies' were significant contributors to the debt. Therefore, the answer is 'D. both B and C.'
Final answer:
The British National Debt in 1763 was significantly caused by expenses from the French and Indian War and the ongoing cost of a military presence in the American colonies.
Explanation:
The cause of the British National Debt in 1763 was largely due to the financial burden incurred by the French and Indian War (1756-1763). This conflict nearly doubled Britain's national debt from £75 million to £133 million, with interest payments consuming over half of the national budget. Additionally, the continued British military presence in the American colonies after the war contributed to this enormous debt as maintaining the army and securing the frontier against further conflicts was a costly endeavor.
Therefore, the correct answer to the question is 'both B and C' as both the French and Indian War and the continued military presence in the American colonies were significant causes of the financial strain experienced by Great Britain.
For which of the following activities were the Sons of Liberty responsible?
the Stamp Act Congress
the hanging and beheading of a stamp commissioner in effigy
the massacre of Conestoga in Pennsylvania
the introduction of the Virginia Stamp Act Resolutions
Answer:
the hanging and beheading of a stamp commissioner in effigy
Explanation:
The Sons of Liberty were a group of dissidents of the North American British Colonies during the early American Revolution days in Boston. When the group first formed they were known as the Loyal Nine and consisted of shopkeepers and artisans. Their name “Sons of Liberty” came after the debate over the Stamp Act in February 1765.
In August 1765 the Sons of Liberty gathered under the “Liberty Tree” where were located effigies of Andrew Oliver the public official in charge of enforcing the Stamp Act and others. They removed the effigies, stomped-on it, beheaded and burned it in a fit of anger.
Who were the main combatants in the French and Indian War?
France against Indians
Great Britain against Indians
Great Britain against France
Great Britain against the French and their Indian allies
The French and Indian War was primarily a conflict between Great Britain and France, with Native American alliances siding with the French. The war took place from 1754 to 1763 and significantly influenced the future of North America.
Explanation:The main combatants in the French and Indian War were Great Britain and France. This conflict, which occurred from 1754 to 1763, was part of a larger global conflict known as the Seven Years' War. Great Britain and its American colonies were on one side, fighting against France and their Indian allies. The war mainly took place on North American soil and played a vital role in shaping the future of the continent.
Learn more about French and Indian War here:https://brainly.com/question/3223999
#SPJ12
Final answer:
The French and Indian War was primarily between Great Britain and France, each side supported by different Native American tribes. The British victory in this war solidified their control over North America.
Explanation:
The main combatants in the French and Indian War were Great Britain against France and their respective Native American allies. The conflict stemmed from both European powers vying for control of North America. While the British forces eventually emerged victorious, the French, with the aid of their Native American allies, such as the Huron tribes, put up a substantial fight. On the other side, the British were supported by Native American tribes like the Iroquois. The culmination of the war led to British dominance in North America, as recognized in the 1763 Treaty of Paris.
Jefferson’s election in 1800: (a) continued the Federalist domination of the U.S. government. (b) had to be settled by the House of Representatives. (c) was assured when Aaron Burr agreed to withdraw as a candidate for president. (d) was assured when George Washington announced his support of Jefferson just three weeks before the election. (e) ended party divisions.
Answer:
sorry brother i donot know the answer
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is B. Jefferson's election in 1800 had to be settled by the House of Representatives.
Explanation:
In the 1800 presidential election, Thomas Jefferson, ahead of President John Adams, became the third president of the United States. The election brought the Democratic Republican Party to power and ultimately caused the collapse of the Federalist Party.
In addition, the elections showed the flaws of the adopted constitution. The electors each had two votes, but could only vote for the president, and the second candidate automatically became vice-president. Republican Democrats planned to vote in such a way that one of their electors would vote only once and thus Thomas Jefferson would gain one more vote than Aaron Burr, who would become vice president under Jefferson. However, as a result of the confusion, both candidates from the Republican Democrats received an equal number of votes. The fate of the future president was in the hands of the House of Representatives, where the Federalists then had a majority. To strip Jefferson of the presidency, federalists voted for Burr. This led to a weekly stalemate in the debate. Only the intervention of federalist leader Alexander Hamilton, who hated Burr more than Jefferson, resolved the issue in favor of the latter. In order to rule out such uncertainties in the future, the Twelfth Amendment to the Constitution was adopted in 1804, which allowed electors to vote with one vote for the president and the other for the vice president.
The controversy at the heart of the Ostend Manifesto centered on the fate of:
Ostend, Belgium
Nicaragua
Cuba
Louisiana
The correct answer is C. Cuba
Explanation:
The Osten Manifesto was a document written by diplomats of the U.S. in 1854 that aimed at persuading the Secretary of the U.S. to take actions in order to buy, seized or acquire the Cuban territory from Spain that had colonized it and to begin a war if Spain did not accept to leave the territory. This document was controversial mainly because it was influenced by the interests of slaveholders to expand slavery outside the U.S. territory to which Northern states opposed; also this document could determine the fate of Cuba as continuing under the Spanish rule or became a slave state under the U.S. government. Therefore, the controversy at the heart or essence of the Ostend Manifesto centered on the fate of Cuba especially in terms of the nation that would own the territory and whether this would be used as a slave state.
Consider the arguments over the expansion of slavery made by both northerners and southerners in the aftermath of the U.S. victory over Mexico. Who had the more compelling case? Or did each side make equally significant arguments?
Answer:
The election of 1848 did nothing to quell the controversy over whether slavery would advance into the Mexican Cession. Some slaveholders, like President Taylor, considered the question a moot point because the lands acquired from Mexico were far too dry for growing cotton and therefore, they thought, no slaveholder would want to move there. Other southerners, however, argued that the question was not whether slaveholders would want to move to the lands of the Mexican Cession, but whether they could and still retain control of their slave property. Denying them the right to freely relocate with their lawful property was, they maintained, unfair and unconstitutional. Northerners argued, just as fervidly, that because Mexico had abolished slavery, no slaves currently lived in the Mexican Cession, and to introduce slavery there would extend it to a new territory, thus furthering the institution and giving the Slave Power more control over the United States. The strong current of antislavery sentiment—that is, the desire to protect white labor—only increased the opposition to the expansion of slavery into the West.
Explanation:
Hope this helps!!!
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In those years, the struggle of Northerns and Southerns relied on the control of Congress. Neither side wanted to give up positions and that is why the decision of admitting Texas to the Union was so important. It would be redundant to say that Southern states wanted Texas to enter as a slave state and Northerners wanted it to enter as a nonslave state. For instance, the Wilmot Proviso by David Wilmot (Congressmen from Pennsylvania) prohibited slavery in the new region. Then it came the Compromise of 1850 that admitted California as a free state. And problems, differences and argues increased.
Texas would finally be admitted as a slave state. The Republic of Texas existed from 1836 to 1845 before Texas joined the United States. Besides the likelihood of war with México, annexation took so long because Texas would be admitted as a slave state and all the debated that it generated between the North and the South. Texas was admitted to the Union as a slave state on December 29, 1845.
What specific types of hardships did an average American farmer not face as he built his homestead in the Midwest?droughts
insect swarms
hostile Indian attacks
limited building supplies
Answer:
Insect Swarms
Explanation:
I'm pretty sure its this
The specific kind f hardships did an average American farmer not face as he built his homestead in the Midwest was hostile Indian attacks. Thus, option third is correct.
What is Hardships?Hardship refers to the condition in which a person goes through the difficulty or severe sufferings. This condition can arise due to the poverty in which the person is unable to afford the basic necessity of his life. For instance, being without a job or enough money is the condition of hardship.
As colonists and settlers moved westward to enhance the land granted to them by the Homestead Act, they encountered a complicated and often unachievable challenge.
The land was challenging to farm, there were few construction materials, and frequent setbacks were caused by bad winters, insects, and inexperience.
Hostile Indian attacks were the type of adversity that an average American farmer did not face as he built his homestead in the Midwest. Hence, option third is correct.
Learn more about Hardship here:
https://brainly.com/question/16720539
#SPJ2
What system did the direct primary replace?
candidate selection by secret ballots
candidate selection by machine bosses
candidate selection by convention delegates
an indirect primary
Answer:
Candidate selection by convention delegates.
Explanation:
The direct primary system is a process by which people can indicate their preference for a candidate in an upcoming election.
It was first used in the United States with the purpose of taking the power of selecting candidates from the party leaders back to the people.
I hope this answer helps you.
The direct primary system replaced earlier methods of candidate selection controlled by party bosses and convention delegates, moving towards greater public participation in elections.
Initially, candidates were chosen by party leaders and delegates in national conventions. However, the introduction of the direct primary allowed party members to directly vote for their preferred candidates, with the winner typically gaining the party's nomination. This shift towards a more democratic process emerged due to the efforts of the Progressive Movement to diminish the control of political machines and to increase public participation in elections. This method of selecting candidates through direct primaries is now the standard in the majority of U.S. states.
What were the circumstances that led to Shays’ Rebellion? What was the government’s response? Would this response have confirmed or negated the grievances of the participants in the uprising? Why?
Answer:
In 1780, the Boston financiers and shipowners used the state constitution to reserve the right to vote only to the owners. Controlling the legislature, they levied various taxes for the repayment of the debts of the war against Great Britain, and pursued lawsuits against the largely ruined civilians in western Massachusetts.
At the end of the war of independence, the thirteen newly independent colonies were in a difficult situation. Many citizens got into debt during the conflict. However, independence had resulted in a contraction of trade between the West Indies and the port of Boston. English manufacturers, as soon as the peace returned, put pressure on governments to ensure that importers in Massachusetts accomplished their claims. These blow harassed retailers who did the same with farmers. The difficulties of the indebted citizens were all the greater as the creditors demanded to be paid in metallic money (gold, silver or copper) and refused paper money, payments in kind or title deeds. At first, the peasants asked the state to compel the creditors to accept the paper money but the Massachusetts assembly refused. Taken by the throat, some citizens revolted, led by Daniel Shays.
Daniel Shays was a farm worker in western Massachusetts. He joined the revolutionary troops in 1775. He ended the war with the rank of captain. After his demobilization in 1780, he had to wait a long time for his payment. But very quickly, his debts increased, and the bitterness of having fought for a republic which gave him nothing grew up.
The rebels were small farmers revolted by their debt and the increase in taxes. They formed a militia of 1,200 men, and attacked Springfield in January 1787. They also launched a campaign of intimidation against traders in western Massachusetts.
Massachusetts asked for help in Congress. Most states, however, refused to mobilize the resources necessary to suppress the revolt by individual selfishness. Massachusetts formed a state militia under the leadership of Benjamin Lincoln. To cope, the rebels sought to seize the federal arsenal of Springfield that would provide them with all the weapons they needed. But Lincoln's militia was faster than them and took control of the arsenal. The rebels were finally beaten and then sentenced to death and amnestied.
Shays' Rebellion was an uprising by indebted farmers led by Daniel Shays. The initially weak response of the government, due to the limitations of the Articles of Confederation, eventually led to the quelling of the uprising by a privately funded militia. The rebellion itself prompted calls for a stronger national government and influenced the drafting of the US Constitution.
Explanation:The circumstances leading to Shays’ Rebellion were complex and multi-faceted. In the summer of 1786, farmers in western Massachusetts, many of whom were veterans of the Revolutionary War, found themselves heavily indebted, facing imprisonment and the loss of their lands. They had unpaid taxes from while they were away fighting the British during the Revolution, and despite promises from the Continental Congress, the national government did not have sufficient funds to pay them for their service.
Unable to meet their tax burdens, the farmers, led by Daniel Shays, marched to a local courthouse demanding relief. Initially, the government was unable to respond due to the inability to raise an army under the weak Articles of Confederation. Governor James Bowdoin of Massachusetts called upon the national government for aid, but none was forthcoming. So the government’s response was to raise a privately-funded militia which quelled the rebellion the following year after the protestors’ unsuccessful raid at the Springfield Armory.
Shays’ Rebellion had an impact on the perception of democratic impulses and the governance of the United States. It was seen by men of property, chiefly conservative Whigs, as an indication of the republic descending into anarchy and chaos. It convinced figures such as George Washington and Alexander Hamilton of the need to amend the Articles of Confederation, which they saw as woefully inadequate in the face of such uprisings. This led to the call for a convention, subsequent drafting of the US Constitution, and the strengthening of the central government.
Learn more about Rebellion :https://brainly.com/question/13938004
#SPJ3
What was the Iran-Contra affair about?
Answer:
Explanation:
sale of arms & missiles for hostages and also sent money from the sale to Nicaragua.
How did the lives of ancient peoples living in pre-“civilizational” communities differ from those living within “civilization”?
The main difference between the people living int he civilized societies and the people living in the pre-civilized societies is the life-style. The people living in the civilized societies have had settled life-style. This mean that they have been engaged in agriculture, producing surplus of food, and having much more spare time to focus on other things, such as sciences, philosophy, architecture etc. The people living in the pre-civilized societies were nomads. They were constantly moving from one place to another in order to be able to find food sources for themselves, as well as for their livestock, if they had any at all. This left them with only one purpose and objective in their lives, survival.
Answer:
The differences between the lives of individuals in a pre-civilization community and a civilized community are that their lives were made easier with civilization having advancement with farming, division of labor, multiple cities, organized religion, science/technology, some form of government, and a written language. While, in pre-civilization these developments did not exist or was at minimal. Thus, making their lives harder.
Explanation:
The definition of civilization is "the stage of human social and cultural development and organization that is considered most advanced." in the pre-civilization stage life was considered harder and more complex. Having limited food sources in pre-civilization era, farming emerged and changed this. With the integration of farming food was now able to support larger communities and assisted with migration. Another example which can illustrate the difference between pre-civilization and civilization is creating written langues. With pre-civilization written languages did not exist. This then caused difficulties with communication. Whereas with civilization, having a written language communication became easier and more effective.
The Long Expedition established a short-lived republic in Texas known as ________.
the Lone Star Republic
the Republic of Texas
Columbiana
the Republic of Fredonia
Answer:
The Lone Star Republic
Explanation:
Today Texas is still known as The Lone Star State.
By the other hand Texas is the Nicknamed the Lone Star State it means its former status as an independent Republic.
The historians books have registered that at the time Sain granted independence to Mexico in 1821 the land now comprising the states of Texas was very sparsely populated.
Which of the following groups supported the abolition of slavery?
northern business elites
southern planter elites
wage workers
middle-class northerners
The northern business elites, wage workers, and middle-class northerners supported the abolition of slavery.
Explanation:The group that supported the abolition of slavery includes the northern business elites, wage workers, and middle-class northerners.
Northern business elites: Some northern business elites supported the abolition of slavery because they saw it as a threat to their industrial and economic interests.Wage workers: Many wage workers in the North supported the abolition of slavery because they saw it as a way to protect their own job opportunities and prevent the expansion of slavery into new territories.Middle-class northerners: The middle-class northerners supported the abolition of slavery based on moral grounds, believing that slavery contradicted the principles of equality and freedom.Learn more about abolition of slavery here:https://brainly.com/question/32043273
#SPJ6
The D) middle-class northerners supported the abolition of slavery due to their beliefs in free labor and moral principles. Influenced by evangelical movements and key abolitionists, they played a crucial role in advancing the abolitionist cause.
Among the listed groups, the D) middle-class northerners were the most likely to support the abolition of slavery. This support stemmed from their belief in the value of a free labor system and the moral principles of freedom and equality. Many middle-class northerners were influenced by evangelical movements and abolitionists like William Lloyd Garrison and Lucretia Mott. The northern business elites, southern planter elites, and wage workers had various degrees of economic and social stake in the continuation of slavery, which influenced their general opposition to its abolition.
The abolitionist movement gained momentum in the 1830s with growing anti-slavery sentiment among northern free blacks and religious groups who advocated for immediate emancipation through moral persuasion. Middle-class evangelicals, inspired by their commitment to social reform, played a significant role in radicalizing the abolitionist cause and bringing it into the mainstream northern reform agendas.Which of the following groups supported the abolition of slavery?
A) northern business elites
B) southern planter elites
C) wage workers
D) middle-class northerners
Most English settlers believed a. In religious toleration for everyone, including Indians. b. That Indians were incapable of conversion to the English way of life. c. That North America belonged to England and they would not rest until all Indians, Spaniards, and French were eliminated. d. That Spaniards and Frenchmen were better at understanding Indians.
Answer:
The answer for this question is B
Explanation: