Geologists obtain indirect evidence about Earth’s interior by a. measuring pressure differences at Earth’s surface. b. estimating temperature inside earth. c. directly looking under the many layers. d. recording and studying seismic waves. Please select the best answer from the choices provided

The mass of calcium chloride by calculating molar mass and multiplying it by given mass the mass will be 10.2g

Molar mass is the specified mass of a substance which is present in moles of a substance. The SI unit is gram per mole .it can be calculated by multiplying the given number in periodic table to the number of moles or atom given in data .

Molar mass of calcium chloride

mass of calcium = 40

mass of chloride = 35

molar mass  = 40.078 + 35.4  × 2 = 110.98

calculating molar mass by Avogadro's number = 2.303 × 10²³ ×  5.55 x 10

Avogadro constant  = 2.303 × 10²³

mass of calcium chloride  = 0.092 mol

mass of calcium chloride = molar mass × calculated molar mass

substituting the value,

mass of calcium chloride = 110.98 × 0.092 mol

mass 0f calcium chloride = 10.2 g

Therefore, the mass of calcium chloride by calculating the molar mass of calcium chloride will be 10.2 g

Learn more about molar mass , here:

https://brainly.com/question/15203751

#SPJ2

By doubling concentration [a] from 0.100 M to 0.200 M in a chemical reaction where the rate is proportional to the square of [a], the rate quadruples. Consequently, the new rate is 0.0800 M/s given the original rate was 0.0200 M/s.

The question involves a chemical reaction where the rate is proportional to the square of the concentration of reactant A, given as rate = k[a]2[b]2. When the concentration of A ([a]) is increased from 0.100 M to 0.200 M, the rate of the reaction changes accordingly. Considering the reaction rate's dependence on the concentration, and using the given rate equation, the new rate will be:

Original rate = k(0.100 M)2[b]2

New rate when [a] is doubled = k(0.200 M)2[b]2 = k(4)(0.100 M)2[b]2
= 4 × (original rate)

Therefore, if the original rate is 0.0200 M/s, the new rate when the concentration of A is doubled will be 0.0800 M/s.

https://brainly.com/question/13440548

#SPJ3

The equilibrium constant k is actually the ratio of the concentration of the products over the concentration of reactants at equilibrium. So if the concentration of products < concentration of reactants, therefore the constant k will be small. But if the concentration of products > concentration of reactants, the constant k will be large. In this case the value is too small (x10^-19), therefore we can say that the reaction favors the reactant side:

the equilibrium lies far to the left

Based on the given equilibrium constant [tex]\( K = 2.00 \times 10^{-19} \)[/tex] at 298 K, we can conclude that the equilibrium lies far to the left. The correct option is D.

Based on the equilibrium constant [tex]\( K = 2.00 \times 10^{-19} \)[/tex] at 298 K for the reaction [tex]\( 2 \text{HBr(g)} \rightleftharpoons \text{H}_2 \text{(g)} + \text{Br}_2 \text{(g)} \)[/tex], we can analyze the behavior of the reaction at this temperature:

- A. The equilibrium lies far to the right: This statement is incorrect. A very small equilibrium constant (like [tex]\( 2.00 \times 10^{-19} \)[/tex]) indicates that at equilibrium, the concentration of products (H2 and Br2) is extremely low compared to the concentration of reactants (HBr). Therefore, the equilibrium does not lie far to the right; rather, it indicates that the reaction heavily favors the reactants over the products.

- B. The reaction will proceed very slowly: This statement is correct. With such a small equilibrium constant, the position of equilibrium strongly favors the reactants. As a result, the forward reaction (formation of H2 and Br2) is highly unfavorable under normal conditions, leading to a very slow rate of reaction. The reverse reaction (formation of HBr from H2 and Br2) will dominate, but it will also be slow due to the low concentrations of H2 and Br2.

- C. The reaction contains significant amounts of products and reactants at equilibrium: This statement is incorrect. A very small equilibrium constant indicates that the equilibrium position contains almost entirely reactants and only trace amounts of products. The concentrations of products (H2 and Br2) are negligible compared to the reactant (HBr) at equilibrium.

- D. The equilibrium lies far to the left: This statement is correct. A very small equilibrium constant suggests that the equilibrium position heavily favors the reactants (HBr) over the products (H2 and Br2). The equilibrium lies far to the left, indicating that the reaction predominantly exists in the form of reactants at equilibrium.

The complete question is

For the reaction 2HBr(g)⇌H2(g)+Br2(g), K= 2.00×10⁻¹⁹ at 298 K what can be said about this reaction at this temperature?

A. The equilibrium lies far to the right.

B. The reaction will proceed very slowly.

C. The reaction contains significant amounts of products and reactants at equilibrium.

D. The equilibrium lies far to the left.

The astrophysicist who had the first advance idea that the chemical elements origanted are from the hydrogen in the stars is Hubert Reeves. He was a French and Canadian astrophycist in which is also responsible of proposing the idea given in the statement above as he was concluding his studies and researches in regards with hydrogen and helium.

Tetrahedral electronic geometry can result in three molecular geometries: tetrahedral, trigonal pyramidal, and bent, these are determined by the number of regions of high electron density that are bonded or lone pairs.

The molecular geometries that can stem from tetrahedral electronic geometry include: tetrahedral geometry, trigonal pyramidal geometry, and bent geometry. In tetrahedral geometry, all four regions of high electron density are bonded, resulting in a 109.5° bond angle. With trigonal pyramidal geometry, there are three bonded regions and one lone pair of electrons, slightly altering the bond angle. Finally, in bent geometry, there are two bonded regions and two lone pairs of electrons, again slightly reducing the bond angle to around 104.5°.

https://brainly.com/question/14789050

#SPJ3

Molecular geometries stemming from tetrahedral electronic geometry include tetrahedral, trigonal pyramidal, and bent shapes, as seen in CH₄, NH₃, and H₂O respectively.

When a central atom is surrounded by four electron groups, the electron-pair geometry will be tetrahedral. If all four electron groups are bonding pairs, the molecule also has a tetrahedral molecular geometry, such as in methane (CH₄). However, if one or more of these groups are lone pairs, the molecular geometry changes. With one lone pair, the molecular shape is trigonal pyramidal, as seen in ammonia (NH₃). With two lone pairs, the molecular shape is bent, like in water (H₂O).

The key point to remember is that while the electron group geometry remains tetrahedral when accommodating lone pairs, the molecular geometry alters to minimize electron pair repulsions, resulting in different molecular shapes.

The number of neutrons in the given neutral atom of beryllium is equal to 5. Therefore, option (B) is correct.

A neutral atom can be described as an atom in which the number of the positive charge is equal to the number of the negative charge. Therefore, the overall charge on the neutral atom is equal to zero.

For a neutral atom, we can say that the number of electrons in an atom is equal to the number of protons in that atom. All chemical elements are arranged in the modern periodic table are present in the neutral state.

The average mass or atomic mass of the atom is equal to the sum of the number of protons and neutrons present in the nucleus of an atom.

Given, the average mass of a neutral atom of beryllium (Be) = 9

Therefore, neutrons + protons = 9 in the Be atom

The number of electrons for the neutral atom of Be = 4

The number of neutrons in Be atom = 9 - 4 = 5

Learn more about the neutral atom, here:

brainly.com/question/5308494

#SPJ5

Final answer:

Methyl and primary alkyl halides with good leaving groups like iodide or bromide react the fastest in SN2 reactions due to the least steric hindrance.

Explanation:

The alkyl halide that reacts the fastest in an SN2 reaction is one that has the least steric hindrance, which would typically be a methyl or primary alkyl halide. The SN2 reaction mechanism involves a backside attack by the nucleophile and the simultaneous departure of the leaving group in a single, concerted step, leading to inversion of stereochemistry. Bulky alkyl groups hinder the nucleophile's approach, making tertiary alkyl halides react extremely slowly or not at all in SN2 reactions. Therefore, a methyl or primary alkyl halide with a good leaving group such as iodide or bromide would be expected to react the fastest.

Answer : The number of carbon atoms present in isopropyl alcohol is, [tex]7.51\times 10^{23}[/tex]

Solution : Given,

Mass of isopropyl alcohol = 25 g

Molar mass of isopropyl alcohol = 60 g/mole

In isopropyl alcohol molecule, there are 3 carbon atoms and 8 hydrogen atoms and 1 oxygen atom present.

First we have to calculate the moles of isopropyl alcohol.

[tex]\text{Moles of }C_3H_8O=\frac{\text{Mass of }C_3H_8O}{\text{Molar mass of }C_3H_8O}=\frac{25g}{60g/mole}=0.416moles[/tex]

As we know that 1 mole of gas contains [tex]6.022\times 10^{23}[/tex] number of atoms

As, 1 mole of gas contains [tex]3\times 6.022\times 10^{23}[/tex] number of carbon atoms

So, 0.416 mole of gas contains [tex]0.146\times 3\times 6.022\times 10^{23}=7.51\times 10^{23}[/tex] number of carbon atoms

Therefore, the number of carbon atoms present in isopropyl alcohol is, [tex]7.51\times 10^{23}[/tex]

There are 7.53×10²³ atoms of carbon in 25 g of isopropyl alcohol C₃H₈O

We'll begin by calculating the number of mole in 25 g of C₃H₈O. This can be obtained as follow:

Mass of C₃H₈O = 25 g

Molar mass of C₃H₈O = (12×3) + (8×1) + 12

= 36 + 8 + 16 = 60 g/mol

Mole = mass / molar mass

Mole of C₃H₈O = 25 / 60

Next, we shall determine the number of mole of C in 0.417 mole of C₃H₈O.

1 mole of C₃H₈O contains 3 moles of C.

Therefore, 0.417 mole of C₃H₈O. Will contain = 0.417 × 3 = 1.251 moles of C.

Finally, we shall determine the number of atoms in 1.251 moles of C. this can be obtained as follow:

From Avogadro's hypothesis,

1 mole of C = 6.02×10²³ atoms

Therefore,

1.251 moles of C = 1.251 × 6.02×10²³

Thus, we can conclude that 25.0 g of isopropyl alcohol, C₃H₈O contains 7.53×10²³ atoms of carbon.

Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/5481456

The volume of 0.00324 ml of 1.00 mg/ml of Pb²⁺ solution should be diluted to make 6 × 10² mL of 0.054 mg/l.

The concentration or the volume of the concentrated solution or dilute solution can be determined by using the following equation:

C₁V₁ = C₂V₂

where C₁ and V₁ are the concentration and volume of the concentrated respectively and C₂ and V₂ are the concentration and volume of the dilute solution.

Given, a Pb²⁺ solution of concentration, C₁ = 1.00 mg/ml

The concentration of the diluted solution, C₂ = 0.054 mg/l

The volume of diluted solution of Pb²⁺, V₂  =  6 × 10² mL

Substitute the value of the concentration and volume in equation (1):

(1.00)× (V₁) = (0.054/1000) × ( 6 × 10²)

V₁ = 0.0324 ml

Therefore, the volume of  Pb²⁺ solution of 0.0324 ml of concentration 1.00 mg/ml should be diluted.

Learn more about dilution law, here:

brainly.com/question/15718488

#SPJ2

Need to dilute approximately 0.0324 mL of the 1.00 mg/mL standard solution.

To solve this problem, we need to use the concept of dilution. The dilution equation is given by:

C₁ × V₁ = C₂ × V₂

where C₁ is the initial concentration of the solution, V₁ is the volume we need to find, C₂ is the final concentration after dilution, and V₂ is the final volume after dilution.

Given:

We need to find V₁. Rearranging the dilution equation to solve for V₁, we get:

V₁ = (C₂ × V₂) / C₁

Substituting the given values:

V₁ = (0.054 mg/L × 600 mL) / 1000 mg/L

V₁ ≈ 0.0324 mL

Thus, approximately 0.0324 mL of the standard Pb²⁺ solution should be diluted to 600 mL to achieve the desired concentration of 0.054 mg/L.

The rate of heat conduction through a composite cylindrical wall and a window can be determined using the formula: Q = (k * A * △T) / d. By comparing the rates of heat conduction for the wall and the window, we can determine which material conducts heat more efficiently.

The rate of heat conduction can be determined using the formula:

Q = (k * A * △T) / d

where Q is the rate of heat conduction, k is the thermal conductivity, A is the area, △T is the temperature difference, and d is the thickness of the material.

For the first scenario, the wall with a thermal conductivity twice that of glass wool, let's assume the thermal conductivity of glass wool is ka. So, the thermal conductivity of the wall is 2 * ka. The thickness of the wall is 13.0 cm and the area is 10.0 m². Since the temperature difference is the same for both scenarios, we can calculate the rate of heat conduction for the wall.

For the second scenario, the window with a thickness of 0.750 cm and an area of 2.00 m², we can calculate the rate of heat conduction using the given formulas and values.

By comparing the two rates of heat conduction, we can determine which material conducts heat more efficiently.

The electron affinities of Group 4A elements are more negative than those of Group 5A elements due to their different electronic structures.

The electron affinities of the Group 4A elements are more negative than those of the Group 5A elements due to the electronic structure of these groups. Group 4A elements have a filled ns subshell and the next electron is added to the higher energy np subshell. This disrupts the expected trend in electron affinity. In contrast, Group 5A elements have a half-filled np subshell, and the next electron must be paired with an existing np electron, which also disrupts the trend.

https://brainly.com/question/34135603

#SPJ11

Answer: Option (d) is the correct answer.

Explanation:

An equation will be said balanced equation when there are equal number of atoms on both reactant and product side.

For example, [tex]PCl_{5} + 4H_{2}O \rightarrow 5HCl + H_{3}PO_{4}[/tex]

Number of atoms on reactant sides are as follows.

P = 1

Cl = 5

H = 8

O = 4

Number of atoms on product side are as follows.

P = 1

Cl = 5

H = 8

O = 4

Thus, there are equal number of atoms on both reactant and product side. Hence, this equation is balanced.

The third beaker would only contain Cl- and Na+ ions, with no H+ or OH- ions remaining.

Based on the image, which shows two beakers containing solutions of HCl and NaOH, and the information provided, here's what the third beaker would look like after the reaction has gone to completion:

**Third beaker:**

* **OH- ions:** 0

* **Cl- ions:** Present (same number as in the original HCl solution)

* **Na+ ions:** Present (same number as in the original NaOH solution)

* **H+ ions:** 0

**Explanation:**

The reaction between HCl (hydrochloric acid) and NaOH (sodium hydroxide) is a neutralization reaction, which means it produces water and a salt. In this case, the salt formed is sodium chloride (NaCl).

The balanced chemical equation for the reaction is:

HCl + NaOH -> NaCl + H2O

Here's how the ions break down:

* **HCl:** dissociates in water to form H+ and Cl- ions.

* **NaOH:** dissociates in water to form Na+ and OH- ions.

When these solutions are mixed, the H+ ions from HCl react with the OH- ions from NaOH to form water molecules (H2O). Since the reaction goes to completion, all the H+ and OH- ions are consumed, leaving behind:

* **Cl- ions:** These remain unchanged from the original HCl solution.

* **Na+ ions:** These remain unchanged from the original NaOH solution.

Therefore, the third beaker would only contain Cl- and Na+ ions, with no H+ or OH- ions remaining.

The probable question may be:

These two beakers represent solutions of HCl and NaOH. Describe a third beaker showing the ions that remain after the reaction has gone to completion.

1.) The third beaker contains __ OH- ion(s), __ Cl- ion(s), __ Na+ ion(s), and __ H+ ion(s)

Answer: Probability that the shipment is accepted is 92.45%.

Step-by-Step Explanation:

Since we have given that

Number of total pens = 20

Probability of defective pens = 5%

Probability of good pens = 95%

We need to find the probability that the shipment that yields no more than two defective pens.

So, we will use "Binomial distribution:

[tex]P(x\leq 2)=P(x=0)+P(x=1)+P(x=2)\\\\P(x\leq 2)=0.95^{20}+^{20}C_1(0.5)(0.95)^{19}+^{20}C_2(0.05)^2(0.95)^{18}\\\\P(x\leq 2)=0.9245=92.45\%[/tex]

Hence, Probability that the shipment is accepted is 92.45%.

Solubility is the correct answer. when something dissolves, it is called solubility.

A material's ability to dissolve is described by its solubility, which is influenced by the types of bonds in the solute and solvent. Melting point, boiling point, and thermal conductivity do not describe this ability.

The material's ability to dissolve is best described by the term 'solubility'. Solubility is a chemical property that refers to the ability of a solute (the substance being dissolved) to dissolve in a solvent (the substance doing the dissolving). This ability is determined by the type of bonds in the solute and the solvent. And though it might sound complicated, you could see solubility in everyday life, like when you dissolve sugar in your coffee or tea.

Melting point, boiling point, and thermal conductivity, while important properties as well, do not describe a material's ability to dissolve. The melting point is the temperature at which a solid becomes a liquid, the boiling point is the temperature at which a liquid turns into a vapor, and thermal conductivity is a measure of a material's ability to conduct heat.

https://brainly.com/question/31493083

#SPJ6

Answer: The focal point of the mirror is greater tahn the 18 feet.

Explanation:

Concave mirror only forms the virtual image when an object is placed between the focal length and principle axis of the concave mirror.

The image generated by the mirror was virtual image of the flower which appeared behind the mirror. The flower was kept at the distance of 18 feet away from the mirror which means that the focal point of the concave mirror is greater than the 18 feet.

Final answer:

To form a neutral ionic compound with a 4+ cation and a 1- anion, the ratio of cations to anions must be 1:4. The resulting formula would be AB4. The unit cell structure depends on the size of the ions and can be FCC or simple cubic, but the neutrality is dictated by the stoichiometric balance of charges.

Explanation:

If an ionic compound were composed of a 4+ cation (A4+) and a 1- anion (B-), to form a neutral compound, the ratio of cations to anions must reflect the balancing of charges. Since the A cation has a charge of +4, and the B anion has a charge of -1, you would need four B anions to balance the charge of one A cation, giving a formula of AB4. The structure of the unit cell that accommodates this ratio depends on the relative sizes of the ions.

If A4+ and B- vary significantly in size, as in the case of NaCl, the compound may crystallize in a face-centered cubic (FCC) unit cell, with the smaller cations occupying the octahedral holes. However, if the ion sizes are relatively similar, the compound might form a simple cubic structure like CsCl.

Ultimately, the exact structure will depend on experimental data, as crystal structure cannot be precisely predicted by ionic charges alone. Regardless of the cell type, what determines the neutrality of the compound is the stoichiometric balance of the total positive and negative charges, which in the case of A4+ and B-, a 1:4 ratio is necessary to create an electrically neutral compound.

Answer:

A. Organic

Explanation:

Answer:

Therefore, correct option is B.

Explanation:

For isoelectronic ions : As the nuclear charge increases the atomic radius decreases due to increase in the attractive force on the outermost electrons.

Explanation:

As we know that ionic compounds are able to dissolve in polar solvents. And, if these compounds completely dissociate into ions into the solution then this type of solution will have good conductivity.

Whereas some ionic compounds dissolve, and not all of their bonds dissociate. This means the solution will not have much ions due to which flow of electricity will be less.

Thus, we can conclude that when some ionic compounds dissolve, not all of their bonds dissociate. We can expect such a solution to have small amount of electricity or conductivity.

Answer:

If an ionic compound will not dissociate completely, the conductivity of the solution will be lesser than completely dissociating compounds.

Explanation:

When an ionic compound dissolves in water it dissociates to produce ions.

As we know the conductivity of an ionic solution is directly proportional to the strength of dissociation of ionic compound.

So we can conclude that, The ionic compound with low dissociation will show lesser conductivity.

for more details, you can refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/19466306?referrer=searchResults

Answer: The given statement is False.

Explanation:

Electronegativity is defined as the tendency of an element to attract a shared pair of electron towards itself.

Electronegativity increases across a period as the atomic number of the elements increases. This happens because the size of an atom decreases on moving across the period. This is so, the electrons get added to the same shell and the nuclear charge keeps on increasing. So, the electrons get more tightly held by the nucleus.

As, the size of an element decreases, the valence electrons come closer to the nucleus or the attraction of the valence electrons increases to the nucleus.

Electronegativity decreases down the group because the size of an atom increases as we move down the group as new shell is added and electron gets added up in the new shell. As, the size of an element increases, the valence electrons gets far away from the nucleus. So, the attraction between the nucleus and the shared pair of electrons decreases.

As we know, atomic number increases across a period and also on moving down the group.

So, the trend of electronegativity is not continuous because on moving down the group, it decreases and on moving across a period, it increases.

Hence, the given statement is False

Electronegativity does not increase continuously with atomic number; it increases from left to right across a period due to nuclear charge but decreases from top to bottom in a group due to increased atomic size.

The statement that electronegativity increases continuously as atomic number increases is false. Electronegativity does increase from left to right across each period, mainly due to the increase in nuclear charge. For example, fluorine has a higher electronegativity than carbon because it has more protons, which exert a greater pull on electrons. However, electronegativity decreases as you move down a group, because the atomic size increases, making the nucleus less effective at pulling bonding electrons. This is exemplified by halogens like fluorine (F) having a higher electronegativity than chlorine (Cl), bromine (Br), and iodine (I) as the atom size increases down the group. Additionally, periodic trends indicate that electronegativity and radius typically decrease towards the upper left of the periodic table. The size of an atom is inversely related to electronegativity, with larger atoms exhibiting lower electronegativity.

Answer: [tex]12.95\times 10^{23}[/tex]

Explanation:

[tex]Moles=\frac{\text{Given mass}}{\text{Molar mass}}[/tex]

[tex]{\text {Moles of HCl}=\frac{78.4g}{36.5g/mol}=2.15[/tex]

According to Avogadro's law, 1 mole of every substance contains Avogadro's number of particles.

1 mole of HCl contains=[tex]6.023\times 10^{23}[/tex] atoms of Hydrogen

2.15 moles of HCl contains=[tex]\frac{6.023\times 10^{23}}{1}\times 2.15=12.95\times 10^{23}[/tex] atoms of hydrogen.

> How massive would earth have been if it had accreted hydrogen compounds in addition to rock and metal?

From the table, we can actually see that the relative abundance of the compounds are:

Hydrogen compounds = 1.4%

Rock = 0.4%

Metal = 0.2%

Earth has only rock and metals therefore the total percentage is (0.4 + 0.2)% = 0.6%.

Now if we are to include hydrogen compounds, so the new total is (0.4 + 0.2 + 1.4)% = 2.0%

The ratio is then:

2.0% / 0.6% = 3.3

Therefore the Earth would be 3.3 times more massive.

> The same procedure of calculation is performed when we would like to include the Helium and hydrogen gas