Answer: The invention and perfection of the locomotive had at least four major effects. First, railroads spurred industrial growth by giving manufacturers a cheap way to transport materials and Finished products.
Explanation:
After the attack at Fort Sumter, what was the next major battle of the civil war?
Answer:
After a 33-hour bombardment by Confederate cannons, Union forces surrender Fort Sumter in South Carolina's Charleston Harbor. The first engagement of the war ended in Rebel victory. The surrender concluded a standoff that began with South Carolina's secession from the Union on December 20, 1860.
Explanation:
After a 33-hour bombardment by Confederate cannons, Union forces surrender Fort Sumter in South Carolina's Charleston Harbor. The first engagement of the war ended in Rebel victory. The surrender concluded a standoff that began with South Carolina's secession from the Union on December 20, 1860.
when were the most significant accomplishments made in achieving racial equality in 1940 to 1954, 1955, or 1966 to 1979? Explain your answer.
Answer:
The answer is the option which is 1966 to 1979.
Explanation: The years between 1966 to 1979 are important because of the most significant accomplishments were made in achieving racial equality.
During these years the civil rights movements became more strong and concern about their rights. They also demanded political and economical equality. But apart from everything the most significant event was the pass of the Civil Right Act 1968. This law bans the discrimination in sales,rental or financial housing based on race.
The most significant accomplishments in achieving racial equality were made from 1940 to 1954 and 1966 to 1979, with milestones including the desegregation of schools and public facilities, removal of barriers to voting, and increased awareness about civil rights issues.
Explanation:The most significant accomplishments in achieving racial equality during the specified time periods were made from 1940 to 1954 and 1966 to 1979.
In 1954, the Supreme Court ruled that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. This landmark decision in Brown v. Board of Education laid the foundation for the desegregation of schools and other public facilities, which was a major step towards achieving racial equality.
During the late 1960s and 1970s, the civil rights movement gained momentum, and grassroots activists fought for equal rights and opportunities for African Americans and other minority groups. This period saw significant progress in removing barriers to voting, improving access to jobs and housing, and raising awareness about civil rights issues.
Gandhi’s nickname, Mahatma, means
Answer:
It's a person regarded reverence or loving respect, typically a holy person or sage
Explanation:
Answer:
great soul.
Explanation:
HS Teacher
What did conflicts such as World War I, World War lI, and the Cold War inspire governments to form?
A. Sanctions against countries involved in wars
B. International trade routes
C. Intergovernmental organizations (IGOs)
D. Underground weapons trade
*apex !!
Answer: Intergovernmental Organizations (IGO)
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Select whether each state has an Atlantic coastline, Gulf coastline or both.
A). Florida
B). Alabama
C). Louisiana
D). Georgia
E). North Carolina
Florida, Georgia, and North Carolina have an Atlantic coastline, while Alabama and Louisiana have a Gulf coastline.
Explanation:The Atlantic coastline refers to states that have a coastline along the Atlantic Ocean, while the Gulf coastline refers to states that have a coastline along the Gulf of Mexico. Based on this information:
C) Louisiana: It has a Gulf coastline.
E) North Carolina: It has an Atlantic coastline
Therefore, the states with an Atlantic coastline include Florida, Georgia, and North Carolina. The states with a Gulf coastline include Alabama and Louisiana.
Learn more about Coastlines here:https://brainly.com/question/12717872
#SPJ3
Why would the War of 1812 be considered symbolic rather than an all-out victory? It showed that the United States could stand up to the powers in Europe. It stopped all future invasions by Europeans. It removed all foreigners from our borders. It was a sound military defeat for the British.
Answer: It showed that the United States could stand up to powers in Europe
Answer:
It stopped all invasions by europeans because it ended the invasion “treaty of ghent” which pursued a path of stopping all future invasions
Explanation:
In China, a university education is ________
Collage in China there is lots
Answer:
In China, a university education is Higher and cheaper.
Which of the following did the Antarctic Treaty do for Antarctica? A. It gave rule over the area to a single nation. B. It established permanent settlements in Antarctica. C. It outlawed use of harmful substances that were destroying the ozone layer. D. It set Antarctica aside for scientific research
Answer:
so what is the anwser
Explanation:
Answer: C. It outlawed use of harmful substances that were destroying the ozonr layer.
Explanation:
Just trust me
Which nation did us leaders fear was leading the worldwide communist movement during the second red scare?
Answer:
A "Red Scare" is promotion of widespread fear by a society or state about a potential rise of ... The Second Red Scare, which occurred immediately after World War II, was ... Regardless of ideological gradation, the Red Scare did not distinguish ... and fear of the Communist Party of the United States of America (CPUSA).
Explanation:
Answer:
soviet union
Explanation:
Who shot Engels while he was snagged in barbed wire? Escape from Berlin worksheet.
There is no historical evidence that Friedrich Engels, the German philosopher, was shot while snagged in barbed wire. He is known to have died of natural causes. Any other interpretation may be part of a fictional context in the worksheet 'Escape from Berlin'.
Explanation:This question seems to be regarding a specific event in a worksheet titled 'Escape from Berlin', which is likely a history study resource featuring the German philosopher Friedrich Engels. However, there are no historical records or academic sources that report Engels was shot while snagged in barbed wire. Most documentation shows that Friedrich Engels lived a peaceful life and died of natural causes. If the question is referring to a fictional representation of Engels in your worksheet, you should refer back to that specific resource for the answer.
Learn more about Friedrich Engels here:https://brainly.com/question/32419325
#SPJ6
Taiwan is a sparsely populated country where many people live as nomads.
True
False
Answer:
False
Explanation:
What is Brahman?
the highest varna, or social class
an eternal spirit that created and maintains the world
the first Hindu priest
one of the minor gods of Hinduism
Answer:
the highest varna, or social class
Explanation:
Brahman are the priestly caste in Hindu society.
Amendment IX states that
the government cannot claim
that the only rights that people
have are
A. given by the city
B. ones that the school gives
C. those in the Bill of Rights
D. In the state constitution
I think it’s c.
Good luck
in economics workers are both producers and which of the following?
im just putting this for the person who answers can get brainlyest
Explanation:
Workers in economics are both producers and consumers, playing a crucial role in the economic cycle through production and the use of their purchasing power. They drive market efficiency and innovation by responding to competition and consumer demand.
In economics, workers are both producers and consumers. As producers, workers transform labor into goods and services, acting as a fundamental part of the economic process. As consumers, they utilize the purchasing power earned from their labor to buy the diverse range of goods and services they need and want. This dual role maintains the flow in a market economy, where businesses decide on production methods and compensate workers accordingly, relying on the hope that consumer demand will cover costs and generate profits.
When considering the economic consequences of competition, it is essential to understand that producers are encouraged to provide goods and services at competitive prices to serve consumers effectively. Workers are motivated to perform efficiently as employers pay them based on the market value of their output. This marketplace dynamic leads to innovation and efficiency, benefiting the overall economy by enhancing product quality and availability.
what was a major difference between the North and South during the mid- 1800s?
a) reform laws
b) views on education
c) slavery
d) none of the above
c. slavery
pls mark branliest if correct have a nice day!
C)Slavery
Slaves were free in the north
Why were the American colonies angry with the British government in mid-1700s?
Answer: Mostly due to taxation without representation.
Explanation:
While the American colonies were forced to pay many taxes to Britain, they were not allowed any governmental input when it came to parliamentary decisions.
By the 1770’s, Great Britain had established a number of colonies in North America. The American colonists thought of themselves as citizens of Great Britain and subjects of King George III. They were tied to Britain through trade and by the way they were governed. Trade was restricted so the colonies had to rely on Britain for imported goods and supplies. There were no banks and very little money, so colonists used barter and credit to get the things they needed.
Britain also needed money to pay for its war debts. The King and Parliament believed they had the right to tax the colonies. They decided to require several kinds of taxes from the colonists to help pay for the French and Indian War.
Many colonists felt that they should not pay these taxes, because they were passed in England by Parliament, not by their own colonial governments. They protested, saying that these taxes violated their rights as British citizens.
Hope this helps:)
What was the main objective of the North African Campaign
Answer:
Secure North Africa
Explanation:
The British wanted to secure North Africa, which in turn pushed the Germans back into mainland Europe.
How has the U.S. fostered both peace and conflict in the Middle East ?
Answer-
First used by the British military command during World War 11, the term Middle East is generally used to describe the region in south western Asia and northeastern Africa. Although the term is relatively new, the Middle East itself has been home to some of the world's oldest civilizations. Their ideas and institutions have spread all over the world, earning the Middle East the name "Cradle of Civilization."
Although this distinction suggests a certain degree of uniformity, the Middle East has been host to a myriad of peoples, ideas, and institutions. Governments arose as early as 3000 BC in the first states of Egypt and Summer. Despite significant defenses, invaders would dethrone these institutions and create their own, marking a trend which would characterize the Middle East until the modem day. Over time, the Middle East and its peoples have been dominated and influenced by many rules, including the Persian, Roman, Byzantine, Islam, and Ottoman empires. In addition to direct foreign control, the Middle East has constantly been subject to outside pressures and influences.
Amidst the political chaos, many religions and cultures developed and thrived in the Middle East. The three great monotheistic religions: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam formed there, and dominate religion and culture in the Middle East today. The great majority of the people in the Middle East are Muslim- however, Judaism and Christianity both retain very strong followings. This division is deceptive, though, because both Christianity and Islam are divided into sects, all of which are represented in the Middle East and provide for still greater religious diversity and complexity.
This incredible variety and historical instability has yielded a very diverse population, which is entirely contrary to the modem western stereotype. This variety is largely responsible for the incessant turmoil and volatility which has characterized the Middle East in the 20th century. Another major reason has been the continued interference and influence of outside powers on Middle Eastern affairs. This paper focuses on the United States as an outside power in the Middle East in the latter half of the 20"' century. It will examine the changing US policy and its effects in the region over that period. Finally, this paper will speculate on the future of the Middle East and propose recommendations for future US foreign policy.
Unfortunately, in examining US relations with the Middle East, the Middle East cannot be treated entirely as a whole. Since the end of colonialism in the 1950s and 1960s, the Middle East has divided into different states with different peoples, resources, histories, and agendas. The result is a region with very complex innerstate relations, interstate relations, and international relations. These relations and their long history play an integral role in policy making. Therefore, in order to understand US foreign affairs with the Middle East, we need background information on each of the countries. Before it looks at US policy, this paper will first provide a very brief description of the basic character and history of the countries most relevant to this discussion of US foreign policy.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Throughout modern history, the United States has had many political and economic interests in the Middle East. With Great Britain, the US was one of the main promoters for Israel to settle in the Palestine territories, which, by the way, has caused tremendous conflicts since. The US has militarily invaded Afghanistan -for instance- when the Soviet Union invaded that Middle East countries in the 1980s. But years later -after the terrorist attacks of September 11- the US attacked Afghanistan.
Oil has been one of the main interests of the US in the region. When Iraq invaded Kuwait in the War of Gulf, the United States was the leader of the "Desert Storm" military operation to liberate Kuwait. But years later, in the George W. Bush administration, the US invaded Iraq saying that it had mass destruction weapons, and that was not true.
On Main Street in Smalltown, USA, there are two banks that operate across the street from each other on the same block. Both banks are being audited, but have different agencies auditing each bank. What is the best explanation for this? Both banks are credit unions. One bank is a National Bank and one bank is a Federal Savings Association. Both banks are federally chartered, but one is regulated by the FED and the other is regulated by the FDIC. One bank is federally chartered and one bank is state-chartered.
Answer:
the fdic is more i charge
Explanation:
Answer:
Both banks are federally chartered, but one is regulated by the FED and the other is regulated by the FDIC.
Explanation:
This is the reason why the banks are being audited by different entities. State banks are regulated by two different federal agencies. On the one hand, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) would audit banks that are not members of the Federal Reserve System. On the other hand, the Federal Reserve Board (FED) supervises those banks that are part of the Federal Reserve System.
How did historians from the 1970s to the 1990s view how FDR handled the Great Depression in the 1930s? A. They believed that his programs were a sort of "half-way revolution," and there was still a lot more that he could have done. B. They believed that his New Deal programs were a "revolutionary response to a revolutionary situation." C. They believed that he handled the Great Depression the best that he could at a time when American society was not open to sweeping reforms. D. They believed that he should have focused more on wealth redistribution, improvement of race relations, and industrial regulation.
Final answer:
Historians from the 1970s to 1990s held diverse views on FDR's handling of the Great Depression, ranging from the New Deal being a 'half-way revolution' to a 'revolutionary response to a revolutionary situation'. Critics spanned the political spectrum, with some suggesting more focus on wealth redistribution and government intervention. Overall, despite the criticisms, there was a consensus on the significance of the New Deal in reshaping government's role in the economy.
Explanation:
Historians from the 1970s to the 1990s had varied perspectives on how President Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) handled the Great Depression in the 1930s. While some considered his New Deal programs to be revolutionary, others saw them as conservative responses to a fundamentally flawed economic system. Views ranged from seeing the New Deal as a "half-way revolution" that left much to be done, to believing it was a "revolutionary response to a revolutionary situation." There was also a belief that FDR did the best he could within an American society that was not ready for sweeping reforms, and another viewpoint suggested that more focus on wealth redistribution, racial relations, and industrial regulation was needed.
These various interpretations underscore the complexity of the impact of the New Deal on the United States and reflect ongoing debates about the proper role of government in crisis management and economic policy. For instance, critics on the political right argued that Roosevelt's interventions impeded what they believed would have been a natural recovery, while the mainstream left criticized the New Deal for overly favoring big business. Dissidents further to the left wished for more radical changes toward a planned economy.
Despite these critical viewpoints, many agreed that the New Deal was an essential step in the right direction. It bolstered public confidence, reduced unemployment, and generally transformed the American government's role in the economy.
Which is true about the process when the Supreme Court hears a case?
Answer:
the justices listen to oral arguments from both sides??
Answer:
The justices listen to oral arguments from both sides.
Explanation:
GradPoint
The United States sends diplomats to many foreign nations in order to do which of the selections listed below?
Select one:
A. promote good relations between the U.S. and those nations
B. establish communication between the U.S. and the governments of those nations
C. all of these
D. promote U.S. foreign policy interests in those nations
Answer:
All of these
Explanation:
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Enlightenment thinkers most contributed to the development of which political idea
Enlightenment thinkers most notably contributed to the development of liberalism, stressing the principles of limited government, natural rights, equality before the law, and the consent of the governed. Central figures like John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau expanded on these principles within the social contract theory framework. Their ideas were influential in shaping political transformations across Europe and the Atlantic.
Explanation:The Enlightenment thinkers significantly contributed to the development of the political idea of liberalism, rooted in principles such as limited government, consent of the governed, natural rights, and equality before the law. Prominent philosophers like John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau developed the social contract theory that emphasized protecting individual freedoms and lead to discussions on the legitimacy of law, political order, and revolution. The Enlightenment ideals of reason and critical thinking were influential in major political transformations, such as the American, French, and Haitian revolutions.
While Locke championed the notion of limited government and the right to challenge any political authority that does not represent the public's consent, Rousseau extolled more democratic political models. These Enlightenment ideas were fundamental in shaping political philosophies and transformations across Europe and the Atlantic. Their influence also reached beyond political context, extending into social and economic spheres, prompting critical evaluations of traditional structures and leading to an emphasis on natural rights.
Learn more about Enlightenment thinkers and political ideas here:https://brainly.com/question/12552409
#SPJ12
Final answer:
Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau influenced the development of liberal democracy by introducing concepts like social contract, rule of law, and individual freedoms, which became the bedrock of modern political thought and governmental structures.
Explanation:
Enlightenment Thinkers and Political Ideas
The Enlightenment thinkers contributed significantly to the development of modern political ideas, particularly the concept of liberal democracy. Figures such as John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau formulated theories on the social contract and the protection of individual freedoms, which later influenced the establishment of constitutional governments in Europe and the revolutionary events of America and France. Their advocacy for reason, liberty, equality, and the rule of law were foundational to the political philosophy of the time and profoundly shifted the traditional views on governance, arguing against divine right monarchies and for the idea that sovereignty resides with the people.
Locke's assertion that people had the right to modify or overthrow a government that did not protect natural rights significantly impacted the formation of governments in the 18th century. Enlightenment ideas about government organization and function—the creation of constitutional monarchies or republics, the concept of the rule of law, and the principles of equality under the law—laid the groundwork for the democratic principles of government we recognize today. This intellectual movement also inspired the development of political entities based on Enlightenment principles, such as the founding of the United States, manifest in its Declaration of Independence and Constitution.
How did the United States contribute to the Allied war effort in Europe? Select all that apply. The United States shipped vast amounts of weaponry and supplies to Britain and the Soviet Union. Millions of US service personnel fought in Europe. US forces captured Berlin. US bombers pounded German cities. Dwight Eisenhower commanded Allied forces on the Western and Mediterranean fronts.
Answer:
The United States shipped vast amounts of weaponry and supplies to Britain and the Soviet Union.
Millions of US service personnel fought in Europe.
US bombers pounded German cities.
Dwight Eisenhower commanded Allied forces on the Western and Mediterranean fronts.
Explanation:
THe efforts put by the american government onto WWII, were first only strategical and support, they lent and gave lots of supplies and weaponery to the allies before entering the war, the american people weren´t so fond of entering the war without any kind of provocation from the axis, once pearl harbor happened there was a good reason to start actively fightin on WWII that when Eisenhower commanded the allies forces on the western and mediterranean fronts, american personel fought and bombed german cities. THe only thing that Americans did not do from the list was conquering Berlin because Berlin was conquered by the soviets in a counteroffensive that actually saved the allied forces in Normandy, otherwise they would´ve been heavily outnumbered if the soviets did not perform that counter attack and draw german forces back from other battlefronts.
Answer:
The United States shipped vast amounts of weaponry and supplies to Britain and the Soviet Union.
Millions of US service personnel fought in Europe.
US bombers pounded German cities.
Dwight Eisenhower commanded Allied forces on the Western and Mediterranean fronts.
Explanation:
good luck
What role did division between European Protestants and Catholics play in Elizabeth’s I’s reign as queen of England?
During Elizabeth I's reign, the division between European Protestants and Catholics played a vital role in shaping England's domestic politics, religious landscape, and international relations. She established the Church of England as the state church, marking England as a Protestant nation, but aimed for political stability rather than religious extremism.
Explanation:The reign of Elizabeth I, queen of England from 1558 to 1603, was intertwined with the religious divisions that were prominent in Europe during the sixteenth century. Following the Protestant Reformation, there was a significant division between Protestants and Catholics. This religious division affected the politics and social dynamics of England and throughout Europe during Elizabeth's reign.
Elizabeth herself was a Protestant, and under her reign, the Church of England, a Protestant church, was established as the state church. This was a stark contrast to the reign of her predecessor and half-sister Mary I, who was a Catholic queen and had attempted to return England to Catholicism, leading to the persecution of Protestants.
However, Elizabeth's approach was less about religious extremism and more about political stability. She aimed to create an orderly and stable nation. In the early years of her reign, she adopted a relatively moderate approach to religion, though towards the latter part of her reign, she did persecute Catholics she felt posed a threat to her Protestant rule.
The struggle between Protestants and Catholics also had significant international implications, shaping England's relations with other European nations, and influencing its expansion into the Atlantic World, with the religious motives for colonization driving European expansion.
Learn more about Religious division under Elizabeth I here:https://brainly.com/question/12278006
#SPJ12
The division between European Protestants and Catholics impacted Queen Elizabeth I's reign significantly. She aided England's transition from Catholicism to Protestantism. However, internal Protestant conflicts, primarily with the Puritans, and the wider European religious turmoil influenced England's global role, especially in the Atlantic World.
Explanation:The division between European Protestants and Catholics played a significant role in Queen Elizabeth I's reign over England. Protestantism was growing in England and Elizabeth, a Protestant herself, chose to moderate her approach towards religion especially during her early reign years by re-establishing the Church of England, thereby making the country's transition from Catholicism to Protestantism relatively peaceful.
However, Elizabeth found herself dealing with controversy within the Protestant faith itself, primarily from Puritans who sought to eliminate any remnants of Catholicism from the Church of England. During Elizabeth's reign, the Church kept some Catholic rituals, its hierarchical structure, and retained the monarch as the head of the Church. This did not sit well with the Puritans, who wanted a more decentralized, independent church structure.
As Elizabeth struggled to maintain the balance, religious turbulence ultimately influenced England's role in the Atlantic World. Protestant-Catholic friction factored into the competition for control over new territories and the spread of religious beliefs there. Elizabeth, concerned about blocking Spain's efforts to eliminate Protestantism, approved of English privateers to raid enemy ships, thus impacting the Protestant-Catholic divide even further.
Learn more about Elizabeth I's reign here:https://brainly.com/question/2094113
#SPJ12
What were some Economical Contributions to Society for Ancient Africa?
(Please answer ASAP) :)
This should help you
https://prezi.com/ooc7sj98q__k/did-ancient-asia-make-more-contributions-to-society-than-afr/
Hope this helps :)
Why was South Carolina established as a colony?
Answer:
It was a link between England, the West Indies, and the colonies.
Explanation:
The South Carolina during the Colonial Period of the North America was one of the most prosperous colonies of the British Empire. The birth rates were high, the food was abundant and the big plantations prospered. It was also one of the most profitable trading ports as indigo, Sea Island cotton, rice flowed through it.
Answer:
it linked England, the west indies, and the colonies
Explanation:
Where did Islamic fundamentalism emerge, and how has it changed society there?
The modern Islamic fundamentalist movements have their origins in the late 19th century. The Wahhabi movement, an Arabian fundamentalist movement that began in the 18th century, gained traction and spread during the 19th and 20th centuries.
Islamic fundamentalism emerged as a reaction to the influence of Western society and pushes for traditional, conservative Islamic values, often conflicting with democratic reformers in North Africa, Southwest Asia, and Turkestan. The societal impact can be seen in the imposition of Sharia law, resistance to social freedoms, and the rise of extremist groups. Despite these conflicts, most Muslims worldwide reject extremism.
Emergence of Islamic Fundamentalism and Its Social Impact
The roots of Islamic fundamentalism can be traced back to various historical periods, but the contemporary wave is often associated with the political and social dynamics of North Africa, Southwest Asia, and Turkestan. This movement emerged as a reaction to perceived moral decay and the encroachment of Western influences, pushing for a return to traditional, conservative Islamic values and practices. In societies where fundamentalists have gained influence, there has often been a reimposition of the Sharia criminal code, and a resistance to democratic reforms and social freedoms, especially with respect to women's rights and secular education.
The conflict between Islamic fundamentalists and Islamic reformers has defined much of the modern political landscape in these regions. Reformers advocate for democratic principles and civil law that align more closely with a globalized world, whereas fundamentalists adhere to a strict interpretation of Islamic law and often oppose Western intervention. This dichotomy has led to a significant societal rift, influencing everything from legislation to daily life and contributing to regional instability. It has also played out in the rise of extremist groups like ISIS, which represents the most militant interpretation of Islamism and jihadism.
However, it is crucial to recognize that Islamic fundamentalism represents only a fraction of Muslim beliefs globally. Surveys conducted by organizations such as the Pew Research Center show a majority of Muslims reject extremism. As the Islamic world confronts its identity within the globalized economy, the tension between modernity and tradition continues to shape the social and political discourse.
Why is it important that the President’s closest advisors are located in the West Wing?
Answer: this area is the closest to the President physically most of the time.
The correct answer is A) it gives the President quick access to key advisors.
The other options of the question were B) it gives the President less time to make a decision. C) it allows the President greater access to key ñegislators. D) it gives the President more opportunities to speak in public.
The reason why it is important that the President’s closest advisors are located in the West Wing is that it gives the President quick access to key advisors.
The President of the United States is the most important figure in US politics. He is responsible for the country and has to make good and difficult decisions on a daily basis. That is why he has his advisors so close in the West Wing, to have quick access to them and never delay a decision that is important for the country and the world.
Which of the following are abrahamic faiths?
Check all that apply
A. Judaism
B. Sunni Islam
C. Protestantism
D. Hinduism
The Abrahamic faiths listed are Judaism, Sunni Islam, and Protestantism, all of which share a connection through the patriarch Abraham. Hinduism is not an Abrahamic faith as it is polytheistic and not related to the Abrahamic tradition.
Explanation:The Abrahamic faiths include Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, all of which trace their heritage back to the prophet Abraham. These religions are characterized by the monotheistic belief in one God. In particular:
Judaism is the oldest of the Abrahamic religions, with its monotheistic beliefs, complex history, and a diverse spectrum of observance ranging from Orthodox to Reform Judaism.Sunni Islam is a denomination within Islam, alongside Shia Islam and others, all of which share core beliefs such as the Five Pillars, but may have different practices and interpretations.Protestantism represents various denominations within Christianity, itself an Abrahamic faith along with Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy.On the other hand, Hinduism is not an Abrahamic faith. It is a polytheistic religion with a very different history and set of beliefs, including the worship of a pantheon of gods such as Brahma, Shiva, and Vishnu.
The Abrahamic faiths include Judaism, Sunni Islam, and Protestantism, which all trace back to Abraham. Hinduism is not an Abrahamic faith. Hence option A, B, C are correct.
The Abrahamic faiths are monotheistic religions that trace their common heritage to Abraham, a key figure in all their traditions. The religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam fall under this category. Thus, the correct answers for the Abrahamic faiths from your options are:
A. Judaism
B. Sunni Islam (as a branch of Islam)
C. Protestantism (as a branch of Christianity)
Option D. Hinduism is not an Abrahamic faith; it is a major world religion with its own unique origins and practices, which are distinct from those of the Abrahamic faiths. Hence option A, B, C are correct.