During studies of the reaction below,
2 N2H4(l) + N2O4(l) ? 3 N2(g) + 4 H2O(g)
a chemical engineer measured a less-than-expected yield of N2 and discovered that the following side reaction occurs.
N2H4(l) + 2 N2O4(l) ? 6 NO(g) + 2 H2O(g)
In one experiment, 11.5 g of NO formed when 102.1 g of each reactant was used.
What is the highest percent yield of N2 that can be expected?

Answer:

1) Dissolve the crude substance in a minimum amount of hot solvent.

2) Filter the hot solution to remove the solid impurities (if present)

3) Allow the solution to cool slowly so crystals form.

4) Filter the crystals.

5) Dry the crystals

6) Weigh the crystals into a tared flask.

Explanation:

Recrystallization is a method used in chemistry to obtain crystals having a high degree of purity for the purpose of analytical or synthetic laboratory work.

Answer:

134.8 seconds is the half-life (in seconds) of the reaction for the initial [tex]C_2F_4[/tex] concentration

Explanation:

Half life for second order kinetics is given by:

[tex]t_{\frac{1}{2}=\frac{1}{k\times a_0}[/tex]

Integrated rate law for second order kinetics is given by:

[tex]\frac{1}{a}=kt+\frac{1}{a_0}[/tex]

[tex]t_{\frac{1}{2}[/tex] = half life

k = rate constant

[tex]a_0[/tex] = initial concentration

a = Final concentration of reactant after time t

We have :

[tex]C_2F_4 \longrightarrow \frac{1}{2} C_4F_8[/tex]

Initial concentration of [tex]C_2F_4=[a_o]=\frac{0.438 mol}{2.42 L}=0.1810 mol/L[/tex]

Rate constant = k = [tex]0.041 M^{-1} s^{-1}[/tex]

[tex]t_{\frac{1}{2}=\frac{1}{k\times a_0}[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{1}{0.041 M^{-1} s^{-1}\times 0.1810 mol/L}[/tex]

[tex]t_{1/2}=134.8 s[/tex]

134.8 seconds is the half-life (in seconds) of the reaction for the initial [tex]C_2F_4[/tex] concentration

The second-order rate constant for the following gas-phase reaction

C₂F₄ ⇒ 1/2 C₄F₈

is 0.0411 M⁻¹.s⁻¹. We start with 0.438 mol C₂F₄ in a 2.42-liter container, with no C₄F₈ initially present. What is the half-life (in seconds) of the reaction for the initial C₂F₄ concentration? Enter to 1 decimal place.

The reaction C₂F₄ ⇒ 1/2 C₄F₈, with a second-order rate constant of 0.0411 M⁻¹.s⁻¹, that starts with 0.438 mol C₂F₄ in a 2.42-liter container, has a half-life of 134.4 s.

Let's consider the following reaction following second-order kinetics.

C₂F₄ ⇒ 1/2 C₄F₈

Initially, we have 0.438 mol C₂F₄ in a 2.42-liter container. The initial concentration of C₂F₄ is:

[tex][C_2F_4]_0 = \frac{0.438 mol}{2.42 L} = 0.181 M[/tex]

Given the rate constant (k) is 0.041 M⁻¹.s⁻¹, we can calculate the half-life of a second-order reaction using the following expression.

[tex]t_{1/2}= \frac{1}{k \times [C_2F_4]_0} = \frac{1}{0.0411 M^{-1}s^{-1} \times 0.181 M} = 134.4 s[/tex]

The reaction C₂F₄ ⇒ 1/2 C₄F₈, with a second-order rate constant of 0.0411 M⁻¹.s⁻¹, that starts with 0.438 mol C₂F₄ in a 2.42-liter container, has a half-life of 134.4 s.

You can learn more about kinetics here: https://brainly.com/question/3334857

Answer:

kinetic energy =  84.0260 joules

Explanation:

given data

one mile = 1.61 km

one pound = 454 g

mass = 20.1 lb = 9.1172 kg

flying velocity = 9.60 miles/h = 9.60 × 1.61 × [tex]\frac{5}{18}[/tex] = 4.2933 m/s  

solution

we get here kinetic energy that is express as

kinetic energy = 0.5 × m × v²   .........................1

put here value and we get

kinetic energy = 0.5 × 9.1172 × 4.2933²

kinetic energy =  84.0260 joules

The kinetic energy of the goose, when converted to the same units, is approximately 83.74 joules.

The kinetic energy for any object can be found using the equation K.E. = 1/2*m*v^2, where m is mass and v is the velocity. First we need to convert the mass of the goose from pounds to kilograms, and the speed from miles per hour to meters per second. So, the mass should be 20.1 lb * 454 g = 9121.4 g. Converting that to kilograms, we get 9121.4 g * 1 kg/1000 g = 9.1214 kg. The speed of the goose should be 9.6 miles/hour * 1.61 km = 15.44 km/h. Converting that to meters per second, we get 15.44 km/h * 1000 m/1 km * 1 h/3600 s = 4.2889 m/s. Finally, we can substitute these values into the kinetic energy equation

K.E = 1/2 * 9.1214 kg * (4.2889 m/s)^2 = 83.74 joules.

https://brainly.com/question/33783036

#SPJ3

Complete Question:

The complete question is on the first uploaded image

Answer:

The solution is on the second uploaded image

Explanation:

The explanation of the above solution is on the third uploaded image.

Answer: The volume of acid should be less than 100 mL for a solution to have acidic pH

Explanation:

To calculate the volume of acid needed to neutralize, we use the equation given by neutralization reaction:

[tex]n_1M_1V_1=n_2M_2V_2[/tex]

where,

[tex]n_1,M_1\text{ and }V_1[/tex] are the n-factor, molarity and volume of acid which is HCl

[tex]n_2,M_2\text{ and }V_2[/tex] are the n-factor, molarity and volume of base which is NaOH

We are given:

[tex]n_1=1\\M_1=3.00M\\V_1=?mL\\n_2=1\\M_2=3.00M\\V_2=100mL[/tex]

Putting values in above equation, we get:

[tex]1\times 3.00\times V_1=1\times 3.00\times 100\\\\V_1=\frac{1\times 3.00\times 100}{1\times 3.00}=100mL[/tex]

For a solution to be acidic in nature, the pH should be less than the volume of acid needed to neutralize.

Hence, the volume of acid should be less than 100 mL for a solution to have acidic pH

Answer:

[tex]Frequency=1.6\times 10^{12}\ Hz[/tex]

Explanation:

The relation between frequency and wavelength is shown below as:

[tex]c=frequency\times Wavelength [/tex]

c is the speed of light having value [tex]3\times 10^8\ m/s[/tex]

Given, Wavelength = 188 μm

Also, 1 μm = [tex]10^{-6}[/tex] nm

So,  

Wavelength = [tex]188\times 10^{-6}[/tex] m

Thus, Frequency is:

[tex]Frequency=\frac{c}{Wavelength}[/tex]

[tex]Frequency=\frac{3\times 10^8}{188\times 10^{-6}}\ Hz[/tex]

[tex]Frequency=1.6\times 10^{12}\ Hz[/tex]

Answer: amount = 2466.95L

Explanation:

given that the speed is = 1900./kmh i.e. 1hr/900km

distance = 1050km

the fuel burns at a rate of 74.4 L/min

therefore the amount of fuel that the jet consumes on a 1050.km becomes;

total fuel used = time × fuel burning rate

where time = distance / speed

∴ total fuel used (consumed) = time × fuel burning rate

total fuel consumed = (1050km × 1hr/1900km) × (60min/ 1hr × 74.4L/1min)

total fuel consumed = 2466.95L

Answer:

A wide temperature change.

Explanation:

The intermolecular force is the force that puts the molecules together in a substance. If the substance is ionic (formed by ions) than the force is called ion-ion, which is very strong. If it's a covalent compound (the elements share electron pairs), then it can be a polar or a nonpolar substance.

The polar substance has a huge difference in electronegativity of its components, so partial charges are presented. In this case, the intermolecular force is called dipole-dipole, because charged poles are formed. In the other case, of nonpolar, the dipoles are induced, so it's called dipole induced-dipole induced force.

When a polar compound has a hydrogen-bonded to a high electronegative element (F, O, or N), the dipole-dipole is extremely strong and it's called a hydrogen bond.

Thus, as strong is the force (Ionic > hydrogen bond > dipole-dipole > dipole induced - dipole induced), as difficult is to broken these bonds. In a phase change, those bonds must be broken. So if the liquid has so strong forces, it would be necessary a large amount of energy to evaporate it.

The temperature is a measure of the kinetic energy of the molecules, so if the energy applied is too high, the temperature change must be extremely high too!

This situation is not real, because if the forces are so strong than the material would be a solid and not a liquid. Besides, even an extremely strong bond may be broken with the right temperature increase, so the liquid would evaporate!

In a hypothetical liquid with intermolecular forces strong enough to prevent evaporation, we would not expect to see a temperature change due to evaporation. The liquid's temperature would be unaffected by this specific phase change process and would only change due to external thermal influences. This is a theoretical extreme, as in reality, all substances can change phase with sufficient energy.

Temperature Change in a Substance with Strong Intermolecular Forces

If we hypothesize a liquid with such strong intermolecular forces that it would never evaporate, we must consider the concept of vapor pressure. Typically, vapor pressure represents the tendency of molecules to escape into the vapor phase; stronger intermolecular forces would mean a lower vapor pressure. In this hypothetical scenario, because evaporation happens when molecules have enough kinetic energy to overcome intermolecular forces, and these forces are too strong to be overcome, one would not expect to see any temperature change due to evaporation.

Moreover, since evaporation is an endothermic process where the liquid absorbs energy to allow molecules to escape, the absence of evaporation implies that the liquid would not absorb energy in this way. Therefore, the temperature of the liquid would remain relatively stable, primarily affected only by external thermal inputs or losses, but not through phase change.

It is important to realize that this is an extreme hypothetical situation, as all real substances have a point at which their intermolecular bonds can be overcome by kinetic energy, leading to a phase transition. Additionally, in real-world scenarios, temperature impacts the kinetic energy of molecules within a substance, potentially affecting state changes at varying temperatures.

Answer:

64.4 g of concentrated nitric acid solution are needed.

Explanation:

First we calculate the mass of HNO₃ contained in 364.5 g of a 12.2% solution:

Now we calculate how many grams of the concentrated solution would contain 44.47 grams of HNO₃:

So 64.4 g of concentrated nitric acid solution are needed.

Answer: The boiling point of water in Tibet is 69.9°C

Explanation:

To calculate the boiling point of water in Tibet, we use the Clausius-Clayperon equation, which is:

[tex]\ln(\frac{P_2}{P_1})=\frac{\Delta H}{R}[\frac{1}{T_1}-\frac{1}{T_2}][/tex]

where,

[tex]P_1[/tex] = initial pressure which is the pressure at normal boiling point = 1 atm = 760 mmHg      (Conversion factor:  1 atm = 760 mmHg)

[tex]P_2[/tex] = final pressure = 240. mmHg

[tex]\Delta H_{vap}[/tex] = Heat of vaporization = 40.7 kJ/mol = 40700 J/mol     (Conversion factor: 1 kJ = 1000 J)

R = Gas constant = 8.314 J/mol K

[tex]T_1[/tex] = initial temperature or normal boiling point of water = [tex]100^oC=[100+273]K=373K[/tex]

[tex]T_2[/tex] = final temperature = ?

Putting values in above equation, we get:

[tex]\ln(\frac{240}{760})=\frac{40700J/mol}{8.314J/mol.K}[\frac{1}{373}-\frac{1}{T_2}]\\\\-1.153=4895.36[\frac{T_2-373}{373T_2}]\\\\T_2=342.9K[/tex]

Converting the temperature from kelvins to degree Celsius, by using the conversion factor:

[tex]T(K)=T(^oC)+273[/tex]

[tex]342.9=T(^oC)+273\\T(^oC)=(342.9-273)=69.9^oC[/tex]

Hence, the boiling point of water in Tibet is 69.9°C

Correct Question:

A mammoth skeleton has a carbon-14 content of 12.50% of that found in living organisms. When did the mammoth live?

Answer:

17,190 years ago.

Explanation:

The carbon-14 is a carbon isotope that has a half-life of 5730 years. It means that the mass of carbon-14 decreases by half every 5730 years. If we call the initial mass as M and the final mas as m:

m = M/2ⁿ

Where n is the amount of half-live that had past. Thus, in this case, the mass of the skeleton is the final mass, and the mass founded in the living organisms the initial mass, so:

m = 0.1250M, and

0.1250M = M/2ⁿ

2ⁿ = M/0.1250M

2ⁿ = 1/0.1250

2ⁿ = 8

2ⁿ = 2³

n = 3

So it had past 3 half-live or

3*5730 = 17,190 years.

So the mammoth lived 17,190 years ago.

The statement is potentially true, depending on the age of the particular mammoth skeleton. It's expected that a mammoth skeleton, as a remnant of an organism that's been dead for thousands of years, would have a lower carbon-14 content than living organisms. However, the specific amount can vary based on the particular mammoth and its age.

The statement is potentially true, but it depends on the specific mammoth and its carbon-14 content. Carbon-14 is a radioactive isotope found in all living organisms. When an organism dies, it stops absorbing carbon-14, and the isotope begins to decay. Over time, the amount of carbon-14 in a dead organism's remains decreases. Thus, it's possible that a mammoth skeleton, which belonged to a species that went extinct thousands of years ago, would have a carbon-14 content lower than that of living organisms today. However, the carbon-14 in a specific mammoth skeleton could also be less than 12.50 percent of that in a present living organism if the skeleton is exceptionally old, or more if the skeleton is relatively recent.

https://brainly.com/question/34890212

#SPJ3

Answer:

216 mL

Explanation:

Molarity of a substance , is the number of moles present in a liter of solution .

M = n / V

M = molarity  ( unit = mol / L or M )

V = volume of solution in liter ( unit = L ),

n = moles of solute ( unit = mol ),

From the question , the respective values are as follows  -

M = 1.73 mol / L

n = 375 mmol

Since,

1 mmol = 0.001 mol

n = 375 * 0.001 mol = 0.375 mol

Now , the volume of can be calculated by using the above equation ,

M = n / V  

Putting the respective values ,

1.73 mol / L = 0.375 mol / V

V = 0.216 L

Since,

1 L = 1000 mL

V = 0.216 * 1000 mL = 216 mL

Answer:Use an excess of ethane

Explanation:

The halogenation of alkanes is a substitution reaction. All the hydrogen atoms in the alkanes could be potentially substituted. How ever the reaction can be controlled by using an excess of either the alkane or the halogen. If the aim (as it is in this question) is to minimize the yield of halogenated alkanes, an excess of the alkane (in this case, ethane) is used.

Answer:

There is 1.29 grams of O2 produced.

Explanation:

Step 1: Data given

Mass of ammonium perchlorate 3.8 grams

Molar mass of ammonium perchlorate = 117.49 g/mol

Step 2: The balanced equation

4NH4ClO4 → 5O2 + 6H2O + 2N2 + 4HCl

Step 3: Calculate moles of NH4ClO4

Moles NH4ClO4 = mass NH4ClO4 / molar mass NH4ClO4

Moles NH4ClO4 = 3.80 grams / 117.49 g/mol

Moles NH4ClO4 = 0.0323 moles

Step 4: Calculate moles of O2

For 4 moles of ammonium perchlorate consumed, we produce 5 moles O2, 6 moles H2O, 2 moles N2 and 4 moles HCl

For 0.0323 moles NH4ClO4 we'll have 5/4 * 0.0323 = 0.040375 moles of O2

Step 5: Calculate mass of O2

Mass O2 = moles O2 * molar mass O2

Mass O2 = 0.040375 moles * 32 g/mol

Mass O2 = 1.29 grams

There is 1.29 grams of O2 produced.

The mass of oxygen gas produced by the reaction of 3.8 g g ammonium perchlorate is 1.03 grams.

The balanced equation for the reaction of ammonium perchlorate is:

NH₄ClO₄ → 2H₂O + 2HCl + O₂

For every 1 mole of ammonium perchlorate, 1 mole of oxygen gas (O₂) is produced.

The molar mass of ammonium perchlorate (NH₄ClO₄) is calculated as follows:

NH₄ClO₄: (1 × 14.01 g/mol) + (4 × 1.01 g/mol) + (1×* 35.45 g/mol) + (4 × 16.00 g/mol) = 117.49 g/mol

Moles of NH₄ClO₄ = mass / molar mass = 3.8 g / 117.49 g/mol

For every mole of ammonium perchlorate, 1 mole of oxygen gas is produced. Therefore, the number of moles of oxygen gas produced is equal to the number of moles of ammonium perchlorate.

Moles of O₂ = Moles of NH₄ClO₄

Mass of O₂ = moles of O₂ × molar mass of O₂

Mass of O₂ = moles of O₂ × molar mass of O₂ = moles of NH₄ClO₄ × molar mass of O₂

Mass of O₂ = (3.8 g / 117.49 g/mol) × 32.00 g/mol = 1.03 g

Learn more about reaction, here:

https://brainly.com/question/30464598

#SPJ6

Answer: The least soluble will be Na2SO4

Explanation:

C6H12, is the chemical formula for cyclohexane, a ORGANIC compound and volatile liquid.

Recall that, organic solvents do dissolve organic solutes. Now, of all the substances given in the options, NA2SO4 is the most ionic and inorganic as well.

Thus, it will be the least soluble

The substance which would be least soluble in C6H12 is; Choice B; Na2SO4

Solubility of Organic compounds

By convention, organic compounds are veryich soluble in organic compounds.

Hence, compounds C2H6 and CH3CH2OH would be very much soluble in the compound, C6H12.

The compound which is least soluble in C6H12 is the inorganic and highly ionic Na2SO4.

Read more on solubility in organic solvents:

https://brainly.com/question/13796595

Answer:

The temperature of the system after reaching equilibrium is 314.21 K.

Explanation:

Heat lost by gold will be equal to heat gained by the water

[tex]-Q_1=Q_2[/tex]

Mass of iron = [tex]m_1=75.0 g[/tex]

Specific heat capacity of gold= [tex]c_1=0.126 J/gK [/tex]

Initial temperature of the gold= [tex]T_1=650.0 K [/tex]

Final temperature of gold = [tex]T_2[/tex]=T

[tex]Q_1=m_1c_1\times (T-T_1)[/tex]

Mass of water= [tex]m_2=180.0 g[/tex]

Specific heat capacity of water= [tex]c_2=4.184 J/gK [/tex]

Initial temperature of the water = [tex]T_3=310 K[/tex]

Final temperature of water = [tex]T_2[/tex]=T

[tex]Q_2=m_2c_2\times (T-T_3)[/tex]

[tex]-Q_1=Q_2[/tex]

[tex]-(m_1c_1\times (T-T_1))=m_2c_2\times (T-T_3)[/tex]

On substituting all values:

[tex]-(75.0 g\times 0.126 J/gK\times (T-650.0K))=180.0 g\times 4.184 J/gK\times (T-310.0K)[/tex]

we get, T = 314.21 K

The temperature of the system after reaching equilibrium is 314.21 K.

Final answer:

The question asks for the final temperature of a gold and water system at thermal equilibrium, a concept from chemistry involving heat transfer calculations.

Explanation:

The question involves calculating the final temperature of a system consisting of gold and water once they reach thermal equilibrium. This is a classic problem in thermodynamics, specifically within the scope of heat transfer and calorimetry. According to the principle of conservation of energy, the heat lost by the gold will be equal to the heat gained by the water until equilibrium is reached. However, the exact calculation requires knowing the specific heat capacities of gold and water, which are not provided in the query. Typically, you would use the formula q=mcΔT (where q is the heat absorbed or released, m is the mass, c is the specific heat capacity, and ΔT is the change in temperature) for both substances and set the heat lost by gold equal to the heat gained by water to find the final equilibrium temperature.

Answer:

see explanation below

Explanation:

You are not putting all the structures correctly. Luckily I found the question on another place, so the complete structures you can see them in picture 1.

Now, according to the picture 1, we have all the six reactions. The general mechanism is the same for all and then, if you can have the possibility to rearrange the molecule, you can do that too.

Now, the general mechanism as I stated earlier is the same. The double bond from the diene (The one with one double bond at least) attacks the dienophyle (The first double bond), this bond do resonance to the conjugate bond, and the other double bond attacks the diene, and form a new product.

According to this, the product for each reaction, you can see it in picture 2 and 3:

In Diels-Alder reactions, a diene reacts with a dienophile to form a cyclic compound. Only reactions (b) and (e) will result in Diels-Alder adducts.

In order to predict the products of the given Diels-Alder reactions, we need to identify the diene and dienophile components. The diene is usually a compound containing two double bonds, while the dienophile is a compound with a double bond. The reaction between the diene and dienophile will form a cyclic compound known as the Diels-Alder adduct. Let's examine each reaction:

(a) COOH + HOOC: Neither COOH nor HOOC contain diene or dienophile functionality, so no Diels-Alder reaction will occur.

(b) HOOC + CN: This reaction involves a diene (HOOC) and a dienophile (CN). The Diels-Alder adduct will be formed.

(c) O + O: Neither O nor O contain diene or dienophile functionality, so no Diels-Alder reaction will occur.

(d) S + OOO: Both S and OOO contain diene functionality, but no dienophile. Therefore, a Diels-Alder reaction will not occur.

(e) CN + NC: This reaction involves a diene (CN) and a dienophile (NC). The Diels-Alder adduct will be formed.

(f) OOO S MeO OMe: Neither OOO nor S MeO OMe contain diene or dienophile functionality, so no Diels-Alder reaction will occur.

Answer: The spacing between the crystal planes is [tex]4.07\times 10^{-10}m[/tex]

Explanation:

To calculate the spacing between the crystal planes, we use the equation given by Bragg, which is:

[tex]n\lambda =2d\sin \theta[/tex]

where,

n = order of diffraction = 2

[tex]\lambda[/tex] = wavelength of the light = [tex]154pm=1.54\times 10^{-10}m[/tex]     (Conversion factor:  [tex]1m=10^{12}pm[/tex] )

d = spacing between the crystal planes = ?

[tex]\theta[/tex] = angle of diffraction = 22.20°

Putting values in above equation, we get:

[tex]2\times 1.54\times 10^{-10}=2d\sin (22.20)\\\\d=\frac{2\times 1.54\times 10^{-10}}{2\times \sin (22.20)}\\\\d=4.07\times 10^{-10}m[/tex]

Hence, the spacing between the crystal planes is [tex]4.07\times 10^{-10}m[/tex]

Final answer:

The spacing between the crystal planes can be found using Bragg's law, and using the given values for a second-order diffraction and the X-ray wavelength, the calculation will yield the required plane spacing.

Explanation:

The question is about determining the spacing between the crystal planes using X-ray diffraction data. When X-rays are diffracted by the crystal planes, the relationship between the angle of diffraction (Bragg angle), the wavelength of the X-rays, and the spacing between the planes is given by Bragg's law:

Bragg's Law: nλ = 2d sin(θ)

Where:

For the given problem where a second-order diffraction for a gold crystal is observed at an angle of 22.20° for X-rays of 154 pm (0.154 nm), we can rearrange Bragg's law to solve for d:

d = nλ / (2 sin(θ))

Using the provided values, we can calculate:

d = 2(0.154 nm) / (2 sin(22.20°))

This calculation yields the spacing between the crystal planes, which is the answer to the student's question.

Answer:

0.0022369 mph

Explanation:

a snail crawls at a rate of 0.10 cm/s

1mile = 5280 ft

Scientifically 1 cm/s = 0.022369 mph

therefore  0.10cm/s =  0.10cm/s x 0.022369 mph = 0.0022369 mph

Answer: option E. nitrogen is much more electronegative than hydrogen.​

Explanation:

Answer: E: nitrogen is much more electronegative than hydrogen.​

Explanation:

Each N-H bond is polar because N is more electronegative than H. NH3 is overall asymmetrical in its VSEPR shape, so the dipoles don't cancel out and it is therefore polar.

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Answer:

The  volume of the ball is 4.82 mL (opton C)

Explanation:

Step 1: Data given

Mass of the lead ball = 55.0 grams

Density = 11.4 g/cm³

Step 2: Calculate volume of the balloon

Volume = mass / density

Volume = 55.0 g / 11.4 g/cm³

Volume = 4.82 cm³ = 4.82 mL

The  volume of the ball is 4.82 mL (opton C)

To find the molar internal energy using the Boltzmann Distribution Law, calculate the energy level probabilities at the given temperatures, compute the average energy, then multiply it by Avogadro's number. The change in internal energy and molar entropy is derived from the differences in these quantities between 10K and 1000K.

To solve for the molar internal energy U at different temperatures using the Boltzmann Distribution Law, we first need to calculate the probabilities of each energy level at the given temperature T. For a three-level system, these probabilities depend on the energy levels and the temperature through the relation Pi = e(-εi/kBT), where εi is the energy of level i, kB is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the temperature.

For T=10.0K:

Repeat the steps for T=1000K to find U at the higher temperature.

The change in molar internal energy ΔU when the temperature changes from T=10K to T=1000K can be calculated by taking the difference of U values obtained at both temperatures.

To calculate molar entropy S at T=10K, use the probabilities you calculated and the Boltzmann formula S = kB Σ Pi ln(Pi) and sum over all states i.

The change in molar entropy when the temperature changes from T=10K to T=1000K can be calculated by finding the difference in entropy values at both temperatures.

Answer:

Explanation:

The 1H NMR signal of (CH₃)₂Mg can be obtained in diethyl ether and tetrahydrofuran. (CH₃)₂Mg tends to polymerize in diethyl ether but mostly remain monomer in tetrahydrofuran. The negative value of chemical shifts shows that the protons of (CH₃)₂Mg are more shielded than the protons of TMS.

In diethyl ether, the structure of (CH₃)₂Mg is predicted in Figure A (attached). The A group in the structure represents the solvent. The chemical shift at -1.46 ppm is associated with protons of the bridging methyl groups while the signal at -1.74 ppm is for the proton of the terminal methyl group.

In THF, the two possible structures of (CH₃)₂Mg are predicted in Figure B (attached).  Chemical shift at -1.76 ppm is associated with unsolvated monomer of (CH₃)₂Mg while the shift at -1.81 refers to the protons of methyl group bonded to the solvated (CH₃)₂Mg. The solvent is represented as Y in the Figure B.

This study is reported by J. Heard in "NMR of organomagnessium compounds".

The starting material to synthesize 2-methylhept-3-yne under the given conditions is 4-methyl-1-pentyne, which undergoes alkylation with 1-bromopropane to form the desired product.

The question involves a synthetic route to create 2-methylhept-3-yne using specific reagents and limitations on the carbon count of the starting material. The sodium amide in liquid ammonia indicates a need for a strong base, suggesting an elimination reaction. With the addition of 1-bromopropane, we're looking at an alkylation step which introduces the propyl group.

Given the restrictions, the most fitting starting material would be 4-methyl-1-pentyne. This molecule can undergo alkylation at the terminal methyl group with 1-bromopropane to extend the carbon chain by three carbons, leading to the desired product, 2-methylhept-3-yne. The overall strategy leverages a reaction sequence involving an initial alkyne substrate that can be elongated with an alkyl halide using the action of a strong base.

The starting material for the formation of 2-methylhept-3-yne is 3-methylbutyne. The structure of 3-methylbutyne is attached below

The starting material for the formation of 2-methylhept-3-yne is 3-methylbutyne

Stepwise formation of 2-methylhept-3-yne

Step 1:

The first step is the formation of the Acetylide Ion

3-methylbutyne reacts with sodium amide (NaNH₂) in liquid ammonia to form the acetylide ion:

(CH₃)₂CHC≡CH + NaNH₂ → (CH₃)₂CC≡C⁻Na⁺ + NH₃

Step 2:

The second step is the alkylation of the Acetylide Ion

The acetylide ion reacts with 1-bromopropane (CH₃CH₂CH₂Br) through an SN2 mechanism to form 2-methylhept-3-yne:

(CH₃)₂CC≡C⁻Na⁺ + CH₃CH₂CH₂Br → (CH₃)₂CC≡CCH₂CH₂CH₃ + NaBr

Hence, the final product is 2-methylhept-3-yne:

(CH₃)₂CC≡CCH₂CH₂CH₃

Answer:

Explanation:

The percentage of unit cell volume = Volume of atoms/Volume of unit cell

Volume of sphere = [tex]\frac{4 }{3} \pi r^2[/tex]

a) Percentage of unit cell volume occupied by atoms in face- centered cubic lattice:

let the side of each cube = a

Volume of unit cell = Volume of cube = a³

Radius of atoms = [tex]\frac{a\sqrt{2} }{4}[/tex]

Volume of each atom = [tex]\frac{4 }{3} \pi (\frac{a\sqrt{2}}{4})^3[/tex] = [tex]\frac{\pi *a^3\sqrt{2}}{24}[/tex]

Number of atoms/unit cell = 4

Total volume of the atoms = [tex]4 X \frac{\pi *a^3\sqrt{2}}{24} = \frac{\pi *a^3\sqrt{2}}{6}[/tex]

The percentage of unit cell volume = [tex]\frac{\frac{\pi *a^3\sqrt{2}}{6}}{a^3} =\frac{\pi *a^3\sqrt{2}}{6a^3} = \frac{\pi \sqrt{2}}{6}[/tex] = 0.7405

= 0.7405 X 100% = 74.05%

b) Percentage of unit cell volume occupied by atoms in a body-centered cubic lattice

Radius of atoms = [tex]\frac{a\sqrt{3} }{4}[/tex]

Volume of each atom =[tex]\frac{4 }{3} \pi (\frac{a\sqrt{3}}{4})^3[/tex] =[tex]\frac{\pi *a^3\sqrt{3}}{16}[/tex]

Number of atoms/unit cell = 2

Total volume of the atoms = [tex]2X \frac{\pi *a^3\sqrt{3}}{16} = \frac{\pi *a^3\sqrt{3}}{8}[/tex]

The percentage of unit cell volume = [tex]\frac{\frac{\pi *a^3\sqrt{3}}{8}}{a^3} =\frac{\pi *a^3\sqrt{3}}{8a^3} = \frac{\pi \sqrt{3}}{8}[/tex] = 0.6803

= 0.6803 X 100% = 68.03%

c) Percentage of unit cell volume occupied by atoms in a diamond lattice

Radius of atoms = [tex]\frac{a\sqrt{3} }{8}[/tex]

Volume of each atom = [tex]\frac{4 }{3} \pi (\frac{a\sqrt{3}}{8})^3[/tex] = [tex]\frac{\pi *a^3\sqrt{3}}{128}[/tex]

Number of atoms/unit cell = 8

Total volume of the atoms = [tex]8X \frac{\pi *a^3\sqrt{3}}{128} = \frac{\pi *a^3\sqrt{3}}{16}[/tex]

The percentage of unit cell volume = [tex]\frac{\frac{\pi *a^3\sqrt{3}}{16}}{a^3} =\frac{\pi *a^3\sqrt{3}}{16a^3} = \frac{\pi \sqrt{3}}{16}[/tex] = 0.3401

= 0.3401  X 100% = 34.01%

The percentage of unit cell volume occupied is highest in the face-centered cubic lattice, making it the most efficient packing with the least free space. In contrast, the body-centered cubic and diamond lattices have more free space. Cadmium sulfide crystallizes with cadmium ions occupying half of the tetrahedral holes in a closest-packed sulfide ion array, resulting in a 1:1 ratio and a CdS formula.

Calculating Unit Cell Volume Occupancy

To calculate the percentage of the unit cell volume that is occupied in different lattice structures, we consider the arrangement and number of atoms within the unit cell and their geometric relationship. In a face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice, each corner atom is shared by eight unit cells and each face atom is shared by two, resulting in 4 atoms per unit cell. In a body-centered cubic (bcc) lattice, there is one atom entirely within the cell and 8 corner atoms shared by 8 unit cells, totaling 2 atoms per unit cell. The diamond lattice is a more complex structure with 8 atoms per unit cell, each with a fractional part inside the unit cell.

The most efficient packing, meaning the least percentage of free space, is found in the face-centered cubic structure. To calculate this, one needs to consider the volume occupied by atoms—which can be delineated through the atomic radius and the volume of the unit cell based on the edge lengths.

Cadmium sulfide crystallizes in a structure where cadmium ions occupy half of the tetrahedral holes of the sulfide ion closest-packed array. Since each sulfide ion allows for two tetrahedral holes, the ratio of cadmium to sulfide ions is 1:1, so the formula of cadmium sulfide is CdS.

Answer: The given metal is iron.

Explanation:

We are given:

The electrons in 3d-shell = 5

When the metal is present in a transition series (here it is present in first transition series), the removal of valence electron takes place from '4s' shell first and then from '3d' shell

Electronic configuration is defined as the representation of electrons around the nucleus of an atom.

Number of electrons in an atom is determined by the atomic number of that atom.

Inner shell electrons for the given element = 18

Total number of electrons in the ion = 18 + 5 = 23

We are given:

Charge on the ion = +3

To calculate the number of electrons, we use the equation:

Number of electrons = Atomic number - charge

Atomic number = 23 + 3 = 26

The element having atomic number '26' is iron

Hence, the given metal is iron.

Answer: the metal is Iron (Fe)

Explanation: The original electronic configuration of Fe is 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d6 4s2

Because it has no charge. The electronic configuration will change from the original because the metal has a charge of +3, Fe is element number 26 on the periodic table b ut with the +3 charge, the element number will change to 23 i.e 26-(+3) =23

The configuration for Fe3+ is 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 3d5, it automatically had 5 electron in 3d shell

Explanation:

Equation for de Broglie wavelength is as follows.

            [tex]\lambda = \frac{h}{mv}[/tex]

where,    m = mass of particle moving

               v = velocity

             h = Planck's constant = [tex]6.626 \times 10^{-34} Js[/tex]

When particle is electron then value of mass is [tex]9.109 \times 10^{-31} kg[/tex].

Wavelength of electron = 0.26 nm

                                       = [tex]0.26 nm \times \frac{10^{-9}}{1 nm}[/tex]

                                       = [tex]0.26 \times 10^{-9}[/tex] nm

Therefore, speed of electron will be calculated as follows.

                    v = [tex]\frac{h}{m \lambda}[/tex]

                       =  [tex]\frac{6.626 \times 10^{-34} Js}{2.6 \times 10^{-10} \times 9.109 \times 10^{-31} kg}[/tex]

                       = [tex]2.79 \times 10^{6} m/s[/tex]

Thus, we can conclude that speed at which electrons be accelerated to obtain a resolution of 0.26 is [tex]2.79 \times 10^{6} m/s[/tex].

To obtain a resolution of 0.26 nm in an electron microscope, electrons need to be accelerated to a speed of approximately 2.75 × 10⁶ m/s. This is based on the de Broglie equation which relates the speed of a particle to its wavelength.

The question is about determining the speed that electrons need to be accelerated to in an electron microscope so as to achieve a resolution of 0.26 nm. This can be determined using the de Broglie equation, which relates the speed of a particle to its wavelength. The equation is λ = h/mv, where h (Planck's constant) is 6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ m² kg / s, m (the mass of an electron) is 9.11 × 10⁻³¹ kg, and v is the velocity or speed of the electron.

To find v, we can rearrange the equation: v = h/mλ. If we substitute the given values (λ = 0.26 nm or 0.26 × 10⁻⁹ m), we get:

v = (6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ m² kg / s) / (9.11 × 10⁻³¹ kg × 0.26 × 10⁻⁹ m) ≈ 2.75 × 10⁶ m/s.

Therefore, the electrons need to be accelerated to a speed of approximately 2.75 × 10⁶ m/s to achieve a resolution of 0.26 nm in an electron microscope.

https://brainly.com/question/36650501

#SPJ3

Answer: 0.0725ppm

Explanation:

133.4g of MgBr2 dissolves in 1.84L of water.

Therefore Xg of MgBr2 will dissolve in 1L of water. i.e

Xg of MgBr2 = 133.4/1.84 = 72.5g

The concentration of MgBr2 is 72.5g/L = 0.0725mg/L

Recall,

1mg/L = 1ppm

Therefore, 0.0725mg/L = 0.0725ppm

The concentration of magnesium bromide (MgBr2) in the solution is 72467.39 ppm. Considering each molecule of MgBr2 has two atoms of bromine, the concentration of bromine in the solution is 58032.60 ppm.

The subject of this question is Chemistry, specifically dealing with the concept of concentration, which is a measure of the amount of solute dissolved in a solvent. The units of ppm (parts per million) imply a measurement of the amount of a particular substance (in this case magnesium bromide and bromine) in a total amount of 1 million parts of the mixture.

First, we find the concentration of magnesium bromide MgBr2 by using the formula ppm = (mass of solute/volume of solution) x 10^6. Given that we have 133.4 g of MgBr2 in 1.84 L of water, we find that the concentration of MgBr2 in ppm is (133.4 g/1.84 L) x 10^6 = 72467.39 ppm.

Next, to solve for the concentration of bromine in ppm, we must consider that each molecule of MgBr2 has two atoms of Br. So, the mass of bromine in 133.4 g of MgBr2 is 133.4 g * (79.9 g/mol Br /159.8 g/mol MgBr2) * 2 mol Br = 106.76 g. The concentration of bromine in ppm is then (106.76 g / 1.84 L) x 10^6 = 58032.60 ppm.

https://brainly.com/question/31665413

#SPJ3

Answer:

6 molecular orbital.

Explanation:

According to the molecular orbital theory, number of molecular orbital are obtained is equal  to the number of atomic orbital combine.

When six p orbitals of benzene combine, the will form six molecular orbital. These six molecular orbital have 3 molecular orbital with lower energy and three molecular orbital with higher energy.

The orbital with lower energies are called bonding molecular orbital and orbital with higher energies are called antibonding molecular orbital.

In the molecular orbital model of benzene, six p atomic orbitals combine to form six molecular orbitals. These result from the overlapping p orbitals of the six carbon atoms in the benzene ring, forming a 'pi electron cloud'.

In the molecular orbital model of benzene, the six p atomic orbitals combine to form six molecular orbitals. This happens because benzene has a cyclic structure where the overlapping p orbitals of six carbon atoms form what is known as a 'pi electron cloud'. This pi electron cloud is a result of side-on overlap of p orbitals encompassing all the six carbon atoms. So, essentially, the six overlapping p orbitals produce six molecular orbitals. These six orbitals then distribute themselves into differing energy levels. Three of these orbitals tend to be lower energy (bonding), and the other three are higher energy (anti-bonding).

https://brainly.com/question/33957316

#SPJ3

Answer: acid dissociation constant Ka= 2.00×10^-7

Explanation:

For the reaction

HA + H20. ----> H3O+ A-

Initially: C. 0. 0

After : C-Cx. Cx. Cx

Ka= [H3O+][A-]/[HA]

Ka= Cx × Cx/C-Cx

Ka= C²X²/C(1-x)

Ka= Cx²/1-x

Where x is degree of dissociation = 0.1% = 0.001 and c is the concentration =0.2

Ka= 0.2(0.001²)/(1-0.001)

Ka= 2.00×10^-7

Therefore the dissociation constant is

2.00×10^-7