Answer:
1. Inductive argument.
2. Inductive argument.
3. Deductve argument.
Explanation:
1. This argument is inductive. The conclusion is a generalization, that is drawn by a premise, the premise has been obtained out of experimentation.
If two grains of sand have diamons, it doesn´t mean the entire beach is made of them. This argument is not strong because the conclusion is not accurate.
2. This is a deductive argument. This type of argument depends on the logic struture of it. If the premise were to be true, the conclusion would be true also.
It is not a sound argument, because thanksgiving happends every fourth thursday of november. It is an invalid argument because the premise is false, there for the concusion is false.
3. This is an invalid deductive argument. The premise is incorrect, so the conclusion that is being deduce from it is also wrong. It is not a sound argument because if you double the length of the sides of a square, the area would quatriple.
The determination of deductive and inductive arguments are as follows:
1. This is an inductive argument because it starts from specific premises, suggesting that if the premises are true, then the conclusion cannot be false. However, this argument is not strong and it has inaccurate conclusion.
2. This is an inductive argument as it starts from specific premises to form a general conclusion, which may be true or, as in this case, false. The argument is invalid and unsound and leads to a false conclusion.
3. This is a deductive argument because it uses the general premises to form a specific conclusion. When conclusions are reached through deductive reasoning, the conclusions cannot be incorrect, provided the premises are true.
In this case, the argument is invalid with incorrect premises and a wrong conclusion. The argument is not sound since doubling the length of the sides of a square would make the area to quadruple.
What are inductive and deductive arguments?Inductive argument is reasoning that involves starting from specific premises to form a general conclusion, which may or not be accurate.
On the other hand, deductive argument is reasoning that involves using general premises to form a specific conclusion. Conclusions reached via deductive reasoning cannot be incorrect, provided the premises are true.
Learn more about inductive and deductive arguments at https://brainly.com/question/2192957
Should companies be responsible for unemployment caused by their information systems? Why or why not?
they should be reposnible
When she was a child, Amy had a bad experience jumping from a diving board. To this day, she considers herself a weak swimmer. That experience affected her __________. A. self-esteem B. reflective self C. self-monitoring D. presenting self E. self-concept
Answer:
E. self-concept
Explanation:
Self-concept -
It is the collection of the beliefs or knowledge , that a person collects in his or her mind , during the growing stages , is referred to as self - concept.
Hence , the growing age of child id very important to learn and adapt new and fresh concepts in his mind .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
The correct term is self - concept.
b) A study wanted to compare the 50 states food expenditures. The researchers measured the amount spent by the state's entire population for food in grocery stores and total amount spent on restaurant food. From their 50 data points (Washington DC not in the study), the researchers calculated a correlation of 0.988. Based on this study, can we say that individuals who spend a lot on groceries also spend a lot at restaurants? What is the lurking variable?
1/2, line rises
we are given the following pair of points and and we are to find the slope of line passing through these points:
(-1, 3) and (3, 5)
slope = [tex] \frac {y_2 - y_1} {x_2 - x_1} [/tex] = [tex] \frac{5-3} {3--1} [/tex] = [tex] \frac{2} {4} [/tex] = [tex] \frac{1} {2} [/tex]
the slope of this line is 1/2 which is positive so the line rises from bottom left towards top right.
Which of the following statements best characterizes how secret societies affected the lives of men and women in West Africa? a. Secret societies helped West African men and women move to wealthier areas of Africa. b. Secret societies helped West African men and women gain political freedom. c. Secret societies taught standards for personal conduct. d. Secret societies encouraged West African men and women to attend school.
Answer:
c. Secret societies taught standards for personal conduct.
Explanation:
Most of the secret societies in West Africa were the tribal people and they lived by their own traditions and customs. They live in their origin merely the development of tribes that they belong. They are highly orthodox people and stick to their personal beliefs. These societies taught men and women to follow the standards of their personal conduct.
Hence the correct option is (c).
Answer: SECRET SOCIETIES TAUGHT STANDARDS FOR PERSONAL CONDUCT.
Explanation: A secret society is an association of members, a fraternal organization, or other association which admits only selected individuals as members, whose meetings and practices are often ritualistic and not public, and which often has the purpose of furthering the social or economic opportunities of its members.
Secret society in Africa taught it's members standards for personal conduct by giving out rules and regulations that it's members must abide by.
Some examples of secret societies in Africa are; Ogboni; woke; leopard society; poro; nyau. Etc.
While reviewing data from several studies of how roommates finish each other’s sentences, a researcher suddenly discovers a general principle that connects all her findings. This illustrates the ____ approach. deductive combined deductive and inductive inductive synthetic
Answer:
deductive approach
Explanation:
Deductive reasoning often referred to as deductive approach, is the process of reasoning to reach a logically certain conclusion from one or more statements. Deductive reasoning moves in that same path as conditional rationale, and it connects assumptions to judgments.
The key difference around deductive and inductive approaches to study is that while aiming for a deductive stance and monitoring theory, there is an inductive approach to generating new hypothesis that emerges from the information.
Analyze why older, white adults vote in elections more than other groups while describing how each political party cultivates voters and the role an interest group plays in turning people out to the polls.
Answer:
Voters of the different generations:
It is more likely for any society or a community to have a number of more experienced individuals who know more and are considered to be more concerned about the over all situations of the institutions inside a region. As, the elections are held to elect a representative or a chief executive for a state.
Explanation:
During, the elections in the United States there are certain people belonging to a specific age or generation who are more concerned about electing the right person to lead the national as a whole. As,the people from the age gap of 25-60 years are those individuals who are more concerned about the whole process of driving the government and political systems inside the country.
Helen Keller gained entrance to social life because Select one: a. she grasped the significance of symbols. b. she eventually could "see" the association between a word and an experience. c. she could conceive of things apart from their actual presence. d. All of the choices are correct.
Answer:
By conceiving things apart from their actual presence has helped Helen to gain entrance to social life. C. is the correct option.
Explanation:
You have a listing with a couple who hold title in joint tenancy. A broker brings you an offer and the couple indicates that they will probably accept the offer, but they want to think it over for a few hours. During those few hours they are involved in a traffic accident and one of them is killed. What would be the status of the listing?
a. The listing agreement is enforceable against the surviving spouse
b. The listing agreement is cancelled.
c. The offer to purchase is void.
d. The offer to purchase is still valid.
Answer:
The answer is A- The listing agreement is enforceable against the surviving spouse
Explanation:
The listing agreement is enforceable against the surviving spouse because the couple which includes both dead and surviving spouse earlier indicated that they might accept the offer. In joint tenancy, upon the death of member the survivor immediately inherits the property. Since the couple held a title in joint tenancy then the listing contract is valid and the surviving spouse can choose to sell the property.
Keegan is far from satisfied in his job. Sure, he gets a paycheck, but he feels like he is treated more like an automaton than a creative, intelligent human being. Management in this workplace most closely resembles which theory?
Answer:
The answer is - Frederick Taylor
Explanation:
The management in Keegan's workplace is similar to Frederick W. Taylor's Scientific management theory.
According to Taylor's Scientific Management theory, emphasizes efficiency and that workers are to be rewarded for increased productivity. The employees are required to give more results and optimizing the job in order to increase productivity. The employees are not required to be creative but to do exactly what their boss wants.
The theory of management in this workplace most closely resembles is :
- Frederick Taylor
"Theory of Management"The management in Keegan's workplace is similar to Frederick W. Taylor's management theory.
According to Taylor's, It emphasizes productivity which laborers are to be remunerated for expanded efficiency.
The representatives are required to deliver more comes about and optimizing the job in arrange to extend efficiency.
The workers are not required to be inventive but to do precisely what their boss needs.
Learn more about "scientific management":
https://brainly.com/question/26324729?referrer=searchResults
As referenced by the Plaid Avenger in 'The State of States' chapter, there are numerous political parties in states with large Islamic populations (like Egypt, Indonesia, Pakistan) that are pushing for ruling systems in line with the Iranian model. Select one: True False
The correct answer is True
Explanation: In that sense the claim that numerous political parties in states with large Islamic populations (like Egypt, Indonesia, Pakistan) that are pushing for ruling systems in line with the Iranian model is true because they are using the Iranian model as the basis for their models.
What social traditions did the ""Father of the Turks"" get rid of during his time as president of Turkey?
Answer:
d) the wearing of the fez by men and veils by women
Explanation:
In 1925. Atatürk's government introduced the Hat Law which banned the wearing of fezzes and turbans for men. Wearing of these head garments was punished by law and men were suppose to change head-wear to Western-styled hats, and public depictions were changed with the law (such as school images).
The legislation did not prohibit veils and headscarves for women, but left women to decide on their own if they would wear it or not. The public did strongly advise and encourage leaving veils and scarves only for religious occasions.
This was all part of so-called Atatürk's Reforms that had the idea to change the Republic of Turkey into the secular, modern and Western state.
Hijabs were banned later, in 1980, long after Atatürk's government, and the ban was recently lifted.
Conflict theorists note that Select one: a. people of a lower social class are more likely to enjoy good health. b. people of a higher social class are more likely to live a long life. c. people of a higher social class are more likely to receive good medical care. d. people of a higher social class are more likely to live a long life and people of a higher social class are more likely to receive good medical care are correct.
Answer: C. People of a higher social class are more likely to receive good medical care
Explanation: This is the theory given by Karl Marx, the creator of communist ideology, according to which, in capitalist relations and in a market economy, there is a constant conflict over limited resources. Such a social order, according to Marx, is based on the exploitation of workers by the capitalists and thus gaining profit, and such an order can only be maintained by the domination of the ruling class. This is accomplished through a demonstration of force and power because such a system is not natural, according to Marx.
In such a system, where members of the upper classes have capital, power and influence, they will surely have privilege in all areas of life, even in medical care, that is, they are more likely to receive a good medical care. It is likely that members of the upper classes will also live longer because they have many other benefits than medical care, which all contribute to a better quality of life. But if we have to opt for one answer, it is certain that medical care is what conflicts theory advocates as a benefit to the upper classes. According to Marx, the upper classes, that is, the owners of the capital, are the ones who determine the laws, have influence on the structures of government, so all state benefits will surely go to them, and not to everyone, as envisioned in the socialist system.
Juan Diego participates in meditation several times a week. This practice MOST likely engages his:a. Sympathetic nervous system.b. Parasympathetic nervous system.c. Temporal lobe and association areas.d. Occipital lobe and association areas.
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
When carrying out meditation, the nervous system is is active, generally it is the autonomic nervous system that consist of the Sympathetic nervous system and parasympathetic nervous system.
During Meditation, the parasympathetic nervous system is activated after the sympathetic nervous system is activated, but the parasympathetic nervous system is more active.
Relating to Juan Diego, the most likely engages the parasympathetic nervous system.
Answer: d. Occipital lobe and association area.
Explanation: The occipital lobe contains the visual area, which houses a full map of the visual world. That means it is where all we have seen or felt, is stored.
The association area are the areas that links and coordinate sensory and motor areas. They are responsible for our thoughts, memory,and learning.
From the description above. We can understand that Juan Diego has kept her occipital lobe and association areas busy. During meditation, we tend to use the pictures or events stored in the occipital lobe for thoughts and learning, which is done by the association area.
KEY NOTE FOR ANSWER:
•The occipital lobe houses the full map of our visual world. Which we use in meditation.
• The association area are responsible for thoughts. Which we do during meditation.
Meditation is a deep thought.
Studies suggest that students who study with fewer distractions tend to get higher grades. What is the best scenario for being able to generalize this finding to the population?
Answer:
studying alone in your room away from distractions even musicΞ
Explanation:
I don't believe that the Internet can ever be a reliable source for students to use in their work, at least as long as it remains unregulated as it is now. With so many different web sites out there and no way to verify the validity of the information on them, the Internet is just too hit and miss to be of any use. It's just like a bad baseball player; if you only hit one ball out of ten, it doesn't matter if the one you hit is a homerun — the major leagues don't want you.
a. Personal Experience and Testimonial
b. Testimonial and Authority
c. Personal Experience and Analogy
Answer: c. Personal Experience and Analogy
Explanation:
Personal experience and analogy, are different sources of evidence that are usually applied to support factual claims. Others are intuition, personal observation, appeal to authority, case example, testimonial, survey, and research study.
Personal experience refers to what we only know based on experiences we had ourselves, such as the firsts impressions on the internet in this example.
An analogy is the comparison of two different things to show a significant similarity between them, such as the baseball player reference.
To perform a certain type of blood analysis, lab technicians must perform two procedures. The first procedure requires either one or two separate steps, and the second procedure requires either one, two, or three steps.
Answer: your question is not complete. Please let me assume this to be your question.
To perform a certain type of blood analysis, lab technicians must perform two procedures. The first procedure requires either one or two separate steps, and the second procedure requires either one, two, or three steps.
a. List the experimental outcomes associated with performing the blood analysis.
b. If the random variable of interest is the total number of steps required to do the complete
analysis (both procedures), show what value the random variable will assume for each of the experimental outcomes.
SOLUTION:
let's represent 1 for the first step, 2 for the second step, 3 for the third step.
a. The experimental outcomes are:
Since the first procedure can not take the third step, but can only take either the first or second step therefore the out are as follows;
1 and 1, 1 and 2, 1 and 3, 2 and 1, 2 and 2, 2 and 3 .
b. The value for each ot the experimental outcomes are the summation of each out come.
Therefore;
1+1=2
1+2=3
1+3=4
2+1=3
2+2=4
2+3=6
The question pertains to blood analysis procedures in Biology, specifically those conducted by medical technologists and laboratory technicians in medical labs. These procedures typically involve multiple steps, from collecting blood samples to exposing them to reagents for analysis.
Explanation:The subject of this question seems to be a biological analysis, more specifically, a blood analysis carried out in a lab environment. Blood analysis usually involves several procedures to measure the levels of specific substances in the blood or to check the composition of the blood itself. These analyses are crucial in diagnosing diseases, monitoring their progression, and evaluating the response to treatment.
In the medical field, different types of professionals are involved in these tests. Medical technologists and medical laboratory technicians play a key role in executing these tests. Technologists typically possess a bachelor's degree and certification from an accredited program, whereas technicians may have an associate's degree. Both perform a wide range of tests, including those on blood. Meanwhile, Medical laboratory assistants (MLA) are mainly tasked with processing samples and conducting routine tasks within the lab.
A typical blood test for analysis may include one or two steps in the first procedure, and one to three steps in the second procedure. These may involve such steps as collecting the blood sample, placing it in a small glass tube, and exposing it to reagents in a lab for analysis.
Learn more about Blood Analysis here:https://brainly.com/question/33391531
#SPJ12
The tendency to resist revision of our self-perception is strong. Group of answer choices True False
Answer: The answer is definitely true
According to George H. Mead, when we respond to how we think others perceive us as a subject, the __________ component of the self is being illustrated. Select one: a. me b. I c. you d. significant other
Answer:
IExplanation:
George Herbert Mead was a well known sociologist from the university of Chicago in early 1900's. He is known for developing branch of sociology known as symbolic interactionism . He told that there are two parts of the self, self image and self-awareness.
According to Mead the "I" is a socialised active aspect of a person while "Me" is a socialised aspect, these two terms refer to the psychology of the individual.
According his theory our personality is shaped by the world around us, interaction and reflection on those interactions also play a vital role. Self develops with age and there is nothing biological about it.
Mead's theory describes 'me' as the part of the self formed through social interactions, reflecting how we believe we are viewed by others.
Explanation:According to George H. Mead, the component of the self that is being illustrated when we respond to how we think others perceive us is the 'me' aspect. The 'me' represents the social self and is the part of the individual that is formed through social interaction, involving the ways in which the individual believes they are perceived by others. This is fundamentally different from the 'I' component, which is the response of the individual to the 'me' or more specifically, the individual's personal responses and actions in social situations. Mead's theory is integral to the symbolic interactionist perspective and emphasizes the importance of society in forming the self.
Learn more about 'me' component here:https://brainly.com/question/33099042
#SPJ3
Inference to the best explanation can also be called __________. Group of answer choices deductive reasoning abductive reasoning inductive reasoning productive reasoning
Answer: ABDUCTIVE REASONING.
Explanation: Abductive reasoning can be simply defined as the process of determining "plausibility" based on a set of evidence.
Plausibility here can be said to be an act/a fact that is seemingly or apparently valid, likely, or acceptable.
Inference is a truth or proposition drawn from another which is admitted or supposed to be true.
An inference to the best explanation is therefore known as an Abductive reasoning.
Please, please help...This is on Serafina and the Black Cloak.
Write a paragraph explaining the conflict and the perspectives of the protagonist and antagonist. Review the example in the lesson. Be sure your paragraph mentions the title and author in the first sentence briefly summarizes the plot identifies the main conflict describes the protagonist’s perspective on the conflict provides a line of dialogue that the protagonist says to support your idea (text support) describes the antagonist’s perspective of the conflict provide a line of dialogue that the antagonist says to support your idea (text support) includes a closing line to summarize the character’s views
Serafina and the Black Cloak is fantasy novel in historical fiction setting written by Robert Beatty.
Explanation:
This novel is about Serafina, a young adult who along with her friend is trying to find a man in the Black Cloak who is responsible for the disappearance of many people in the neighborhood.
The story of the protagonist and the antagonist eventually becomes an ideological one however as the antagonist's motivations are cleared.
While Serafina is towards the lawful side of things, the antagonist believes that chaos can be an instrument for the pursuit of truth.
Give an example in which one person has an absolute advantage in doing something but another person has a comparative advantage.
Final answer:
Bob has an absolute advantage in producing both hats and scarves over Alice, but they have the same opportunity cost for both goods, meaning they have equal comparative advantages, and traditional comparative advantage would not lead to trade in this case.
Explanation:
Comparative advantage and absolute advantage are key concepts in international trade and the basis for why countries engage in trade. Suppose we have two individuals, Bob and Alice, who both make hats and scarves. Bob can produce 10 hats or 5 scarves in a day, whereas Alice can produce 8 hats or 4 scarves. Even though Bob has an absolute advantage in producing both hats and scarves because he can make more of each than Alice in the same amount of time, they can still benefit from specializing based on their comparative advantage.
Comparative advantage is about who has the lower opportunity cost. Bob's opportunity cost of making one hat is half a scarf, while Alice's opportunity cost of making one hat is also half a scarf, so they have the same opportunity cost in hats. However, for scarves, Bob's opportunity cost is two hats while Alice's is two hats as well, meaning they do not have a comparative advantage over each other since the ratios are equal, and no trade should occur based on comparative advantage for these goods. Typically, a better example would include different opportunity costs for each person.
The Tongue River Railroad Company (TRRC) proposed the construction of a 130-mile railroad line in Southeastern Montana. TRRC received the approval of the Interstate Commerce Commission. However, the Northern Plains Resource Council argued that the approval was given without a full analysis of the impact of the line on aquatic life, wildlife, and sensitive plants. What are Northern Plains Resource Council’s options? a. The best option is an MACT challenge. b. There are no options because TRRC is a private entity. c. One option is to challenge the adequacy of the EIS for the line. d. There are no options because a government agency is not taking any action, TRRC is.
Answer:
c. One option is to challenge the adequacy of the EIS for the line.
Explanation:
Tongue River Railroad is an organization which proposed to construct rail line in the Southeastern Montana which would connect the areas of Montana and Ashland. It received the approval from the Interstate Commerce Commission.
But the approval of the project was argued by the Northern Plains Resource Council (NPRC) that it might harm the wildlife, aquatic life and the sensitive plants near the line. Thus NPRC can challenge the EIS's adequacy for the construction of the line.
An EIS is an information system that is used in decision making process. Thus NPRC can challenge the correctness of the EIS given the approval without considering the ill effects to its surrounding bu the construction of the rail line.
Suppose that Greece and Germany both produce oil and stained glass. Greece's opportunity cost of producing a pane of stained glass is 4 barrels of oil while Germany's opportunity cost of producing a pane of stained glass is 10 barrels of oil. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing stained glass in the two countries, you can tell that has a comparative advantage in the production of stained glass and has a comparative advantage in the production of oil. Suppose that Greece and Germany consider trading stained glass and oil with each other. Greece can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than of oil for each pane of stained glass it exports to Germany. Similarly, Germany can gain from trade as long as it receives more than of stained glass for each barrel of oil it exports to Greece. Based on your answer to the last question, which of the following prices of trade (that is, price of stained glass in terms of oil) would allow both Germany and Greece to gain from trade
Answer:
an average 7 barrels to trade
Explanation:
Final answer:
Greece has a comparative advantage in stained glass, and Germany in oil production. For both to benefit from trade, Greece should receive more than 4 barrels of oil for each pane of stained glass, while Germany should receive more than its opportunity cost in stained glass per barrel of oil. A trade price of more than 4 but less than 10 barrels of oil for each stained glass would benefit both.
Explanation:
By comparing the opportunity cost of producing stained glass in Greece and Germany, you can determine that Greece has a comparative advantage in the production of stained glass because it has a lower opportunity cost of 4 barrels of oil compared to Germany's 10 barrels of oil for the same product. Conversely, Germany has a comparative advantage in the production of oil since it forgoes less stained glass to produce oil than Greece does. For trade between Greece and Germany to be beneficial for both countries, Greece must receive more than 4 barrels of oil for each pane of stained glass it exports, and Germany must receive more than the equivalent of its opportunity cost in stained glass for each barrel of oil it exports to Greece.
A trade price where Greece receives anywhere between more than 4 and less than 10 barrels of oil for each pane of stained glass would allow both countries to gain from trade based on the principle of comparative advantage. This trading range meets the criteria of being more than the opportunity cost for Greece and less than the opportunity cost for Germany, thus ensuring mutual benefit.
According to famous newspaper journalist H. L. Mencken, simple answers to complex problems are usually wrong. True False
H. L. Mencken, a famous newspaper journalist and cultural critic, often emphasized the idea that simple or overly simplistic solutions to complex problems are typically incorrect or inadequate. The given statement is true.
H. L. Mencken's perspective that "simple answers to complex problems are usually wrong" underscores the importance of depth and nuance in addressing intricate issues. He argued that superficial or quick-fix solutions often fail to grasp the complexities and nuances inherent in many real-world problems.
Mencken's view encourages critical thinking and a comprehensive understanding of problems before attempting to solve them. It reminds us that oversimplification can lead to misguided decisions and missed opportunities for more effective solutions. In essence, his statement serves as a reminder to approach complex problems with care, thorough analysis, and a willingness to consider multiple perspectives and factors.
Hence, the given statement is true.
For more questions on H. L. Mencken:
https://brainly.com/question/31840804
#SPJ3
Mice who received a paired tone and shock 20 times and the same tone with no shock 20 times were not successfully conditioned to fear the tone. Mice who received a shock every time the tone sounded were conditioned to fear the tone. This observation supports the _____ theory of classical conditioning.
Answer:
The answer is - Cognitive
Explanation:
The cognitive theory was founded by Jean Piaget, it explains behavior through understanding of the thought process. Classical conditioning is a process which involves learning to link an unconditioned stimulus which already brings a particular response with a new conditioned stimulus to bring about the same response such that two things become associated in the mind.
In classical conditioning, two things are connected in the mind as cognition occurs subconsciously
The observation that consistent pairing of a tone with a shock conditions mice to fear the tone supports the contiguity theory of classical conditioning, demonstrating the importance of a reliable and consistent association between the conditioned and unconditioned stimuli.
Explanation:Classical Conditioning and Fear
The observation that mice who received a shock every time the tone sounded were conditioned to fear the tone supports the contiguity theory of classical conditioning. This is because conditioning was successful when the conditioned stimulus (the tone) and the unconditioned stimulus (the shock) were consistently paired together, leading to the anticipatory response of fear. The mice conditioned to such rigorous pairing understood the predictability of the shock following the tone. However, mice exposed to the same number of tones without a shock, interspersed with tones paired with shocks, did not develop the same level of conditioned fear. This indicates that conditioning is more effective when the association between the stimuli is reliable and consistent, confirming the fundamental aspect of classical conditioning that involves pairing a neutral stimulus with a significant event (the shock) to elicit a conditioned response, in this case, fear or freezing behavior.
As an F1 student, if you withdraw from a course during the semester and drop below full-time status, then you are non-compliant and out of status as an F1 student. True False
It is generally true that an F1 student would become non-compliant if they withdrew from a course and dropped below full-time student status, although exceptions may exist and consultation with the school's international office or a legal professional is recommended.
Explanation:The statement you've presented is generally true. An F1 student must maintain their full-time status, typically a minimum of 12 credit hours per semester, to remain compliant with the terms of the F1 student visa. If the student withdraws from a course and drops below full-time status, they may indeed become non-compliant and technically 'out of status'. The student should consult with their school's international student office or a legal professional to understand the full implications and possible exceptions.
Learn more about F1 Student Status Compliance here:https://brainly.com/question/28029110
#SPJ2
Septimus files a suit against the federal government to block the enforcement of a new tax law. Septimus claims that Congress attempted to regulate indirectly, by taxation, an area over which it has no authority. If the court agrees, it will
Answer:
The answer is - Validate the tax if it bears a reasonable relationship to revenue production
Explanation:
Tax is the amount of money which is levied by the government on worker's income, transactions, goods and services and are paid to the government. If the court agrees then it will check and prove the accuracy of the tax and declare it valid if it bears any fair and sensible relationship to revenue.
If the court agrees with Septimus that Congress lacks the authority to regulate via taxation, the enforcement of the new tax law could be halted or the law itself might be overturned, adhering to the principles of the judicial process, national supremacy, and the balance of powers.
When Septimus files a suit against the federal government to block the enforcement of a new tax law because Congress lacks the authority to regulate a certain area indirectly through taxation, the court's judgment would revolve around the constitutionality of the law as well as the balance of powers between the federal and state governments. If the court agrees with Septimus, it could imply that the law is overturned or its enforcement is halted.
Tax laws and disputes are a significant part of the judicial process, and cases are commonly heard in the United States Tax Court, United States District Court, or United States Court of Federal Claims. Moreover, under the supremacy clause of Article VI, legitimate national laws supersede conflicting state laws, establishing the principle of national supremacy which prohibits states from interfering in the lawful activities of the federal government.
A movement that advocates replacement of old ways with something new and different is a Select one: a. reform movement. b. convergence movement. c. contagion movement with mass hysteria. d. revolutionary movement.
Answer:
revolutionary movement.
Explanation:
Revolutionary movement - it is a movement that initiates to bring out some change in the old structure or to bring out something new in place of the old ones.
The main reason behind the initiate Revolution is to revolt against the policy of the government that is not beneficial for the common people. it is a revolution which induced when people want change in the society or when people are fed up from the old conventional setup of government
The inability to remember some or all of one's past is _____; the inability to form new memories is _____.
Answer:
Retrograde amnesia, anterograde amnesia
Explanation:
Retrograde amnesia: This type of amnesia occurs when a person is not able to remember memories or events. An individual is not able to recall past events, especially episodic events. On the other hand, anterograde amnesia occurs when a person is not able to create new memories. Amnesia is defined as the sudden loss of the memory in which a person loses the memory of what happened before the amnesia and what is currently going on in the life of a person. Retrograde amnesia is the failure to retrieve memory and anterograde amnesia is a failure to store memory.
The inability to remember some or all of one's past is retrograde amnesia; the inability to form new memories is anterograde amnesia.
Retrograde amnesia is a condition where an individual loses the ability to recall events or information from before the onset of amnesia. This type of memory loss typically affects memories that were formed before a traumatic event or the development of a medical condition affecting the brain. It can range from forgetting recent events to losing years of past memories.
Retrograde Amnesia:
Loss of pre-existing memories.Often caused by traumatic brain injury, severe stress, or neurological conditions.Anterograde amnesia, on the other hand, is characterized by the inability to form new memories after the event that caused the amnesia. Individuals with this condition can recall past events but struggle to remember new information or experiences that occur after the onset of amnesia.
Anterograde Amnesia:
Inability to create new memories.Commonly associated with damage to the hippocampus or other areas involved in memory processing, often due to head injury, certain medications, or chronic alcohol abuse.Both types of amnesia highlight different aspects of memory dysfunction, impacting either the recall of past experiences or the formation of new ones.
Peggy McIntosh described ___________ as "an invisible package of unearned assests that I can count on cashing in each day but about which I was meant to remain oblivious."
Answer:
White Privilege
Explanation:
Peggy McIntosh in her essay, "White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack", wrote about the hidden privileges that whites do have in society.
She asserts that white privilege is like an invisible package. These privileges are there in society but no one acknowledges it. These privileges are used every day as an unearned assets, meaning whites do not have to do much to earn these privileges compared to colored people in the society. Whites can count on (cashing) on these privileges.