Answer:
D. inspire people to pay attention to the life (and art) happening all around them
Explanation:
John Cage, an American musician, artist, and philosopher, was one of the earliest proponent of post-war Avant-garde. Cage is regarded as the most influential composers of the 20th century for his music philosophy and an emphasis on one's life.
Cage described music as "a purposeless play" in his Experimental Music lecture of 1957. His theory was highly inspired by Indian philosophy and Zen Buddhism and his extensive research of South Asian cultures.
He believed that music does not attempt to bring order out of chaos nor to suggest improvements in creation, but simply a way of waking up to the very life we're living.
John Cage aspired to inspire audiences to recognize the art in everyday life through performances that utilized chance and ambient sounds.
Explanation:Composer John Cage hoped that his innovative performances would inspire people to pay attention to the life (and art) happening all around them. This is reflected in pieces like 4′33″, where Cage used ambient noises occurring during the performance to create a musical composition. Through techniques rooted in chance operations and the influence of Zen Buddhism, Cage sought to blur the boundaries between art and life, encouraging audiences to find art in the everyday. Similarly, the Happenings of Alan Kaprow, a student of Cage, involved audiences in unpredictable performances, integrating art with real-time experiences.
Oscar and Felix are handicapping next year's NFL season. Oscar claims that the chance the Indianapolis Colts will win the Super Bowl is 30%, and the chance that the New England Patriots win is 20%. Felix says the chance that New Orleans will win the Super Bowl is 25%, the chance that the Dallas Cowboys will win is 20%, and the chance that the Chicago Bears will win is 10%. Whose probabilities are consistent?
Answer:
The probabilities of wins that are consistent is that of the New England patriots and Dallas cowboys.
Explanation:
Given the fact that both of the teams probability of a win was estimated to be 20% gives the two teams a consistent probability.
Another thing to note here is that the estimation or predictions were made by two different persons that is Oscar and Felix and both teams were given the same probability.
Probabilities presented by Oscar and Felix are not strictly 'consistent' as the sum of the chances for the teams they mentioned do not equal 100%, suggesting that the probabilities for all possible outcomes (all NFL teams) have not been considered.
Explanation:The question revolves around the concept of probability and whether the individual probabilities provided by Oscar and Felix are consistent. For probabilities to be consistent, they must sum up to 1 or 100% when considering all possible outcomes of an event such as winning the Super Bowl. In Oscar's case, he claims a 30% chance for the Indianapolis Colts and a 20% chance for the New England Patriots, summing to a total of 50%. In Felix's case, he allocates a 25% chance to New Orleans, 20% to the Dallas Cowboys, and 10% to the Chicago Bears, which cumulatively adds up to 55%. Neither set of probabilities is strictly consistent as there are additional NFL teams not accounted for, and all teams' probabilities should sum to 100%. It's essential to note that in reality, these probabilities don't reflect actual odds but are merely claims by Oscar and Felix.