Can someone please help me

Answer: 2 1/6

Step-by-step explanation:

Because the denominators are different, and there are whole numbers involved, then first make the fractions improper.

4 1/2 -> 9/2

6 2/3 -> 20/3

Next, make the denominators the same by multiplying each fraction by the denominator of the other.

9/2 * 3 = 27/6

20/3 * 2 = 40/6

Then you can subtract the numerators because the denominators are the same:

40/6-27/6= 13/6

Then you can convert to a mixed fraction if need be.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a + c = 24......a = 24 - c

5.5a + 2c = 83

5.5(24 - c) + 2c = 83

132 - 5.5c + 2c = 83

-5.5c + 2c = 83 - 132

-3.5c = - 49

c = -49 / -3.5

c = 14 <==== 14 child tickets

a + c = 24

a + 14 = 24

a = 24 - 14

a = 10 ........and 10 adult tickets

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

True

Step-by-step explanation:

Sorry if it's wrong lol

Answer:

least common multiple

Step-by-step explanation:

Find the lcm of the given numbers, do you know how to do that?

Alright, so you're looking for the GCF.

Greatest Common Factor

I don't wanna go into detail of what that is (if you don't already know what it is, please watch a video on what it is and how to find it.)

Our numbers are 18, 36, 54

What is the gcf of these numbers? They all are both divisble by 18 and that's the largest 18 can go, so 18 is the GCF.

18 is the answer.

From other source on the internet this question is:

Which absolute value expression represents the distance between 3 and - 2 on a number line?

Answer:

Both are equivalent.

Explanation:

The distance between two numbers in a number line is the absolute value of the difference between the two numbers.

Thus, the distance between a number x and a number y is |x - y|, which is also equivalent to |y - x|.

In this case the distance between 3 and - 2 can be represented by either of the expressions:

Note that when you simplify them you get the same value:

Answer:

The distance between 3 and  

9

2

on a number line is |3 −  

9

2

|. The distance between two numbers is equal to the absolute value of their difference.

|3 −  

9

2

| = |−

3

2

| =  

3

2

Step-by-step explanation:

so the answer is A

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation: 2:16 because Proportion is a mathematical concept, which states the equality of two ratios or fractions. meaning it's kind of  like equivalent fractions and if you times 1/8 times 2 you get 2/16 and all you do is turn it into a ratio  

Answer:

$7 per cupcake

Step-by-step explanation:

A unit rate is the cost of one item. So we would do $168 divided by twenty-four. That would be equivalent to seven.

To answer the question, we evaluated two absolute value expressions individually by converting mixed numbers to improper fractions, performing the operations, and taking absolute values. The sum of these evaluations is 14.

The question involves evaluating two absolute value expressions and adding the results. We will work through each expression step by step.

First Expression

|6 3/8 - 2|

To solve this, convert the mixed number to an improper fraction, subtract 2, and then find the absolute value.

Convert 6 3/8 to an improper fraction: (6 × 8) + 3 = 51/8.

Subtract 2 (written as 16/8) from 51/8: 51/8 - 16/8 = 35/8.

The absolute value of 35/8 is 35/8, as it is already positive.

Second Expression

|-8 5/8 + (-1)|

Similar approach: convert to an improper fraction, add -1, and find the absolute value.

Convert -8 5/8 to an improper fraction: (-8 × 8) - 5 = -69/8.

Add -1 (written as -8/8) to -69/8: -69/8 - 8/8 = -77/8.

The absolute value of -77/8 is 77/8, as we discard the negative sign in absolute value operations.

Add the results of both expressions: 35/8 + 77/8 = 112/8 = 14.

[tex]\text{Hey there!}[/tex]

[tex]\text{What is }\dfrac{2}{20}+\dfrac{10}{75}[/tex]

[tex]\text{For the LCD (Lowest Common Denominator) it should be equal to 300}[/tex]

[tex]\dfrac{2\times15}{20\times15}+\dfrac{10\times4}{75\times4}[/tex]

[tex]\bf{2\times15=30}\\\bf{20\times15=300}\\\\\bf{10\times4=40}\\\bf{75\times4=300}[/tex]

[tex]\text{Your new equation}\rightarrow\dfrac{30}{300}+\dfrac{40}{300}[/tex]

[tex]\text{With the denominators being alike we can leave the same}[/tex]

[tex]\text{New equation}\rightarrow\dfrac{30+40}{300}[/tex]

[tex]\text{30 + 40 = 70}[/tex]

[tex]\text{New equation}\rightarrow\dfrac{70}{100}[/tex]

[tex]\text{Since both of the terms have 10 in their like terms, let's divide both sides by it}[/tex]

[tex]\dfrac{70\div10}{300\div10}[/tex]

[tex]\bf{70\div10=7}[/tex] [tex]\leftarrow\text{Your numerator}[/tex]

[tex]\bf{300\div10=30}[/tex] [tex]\leftarrow\text{Your denominator}[/tex]

[tex]\boxed{\bf{Thus,\ your\ answer\ should\ be:\dfrac{7}{30}}}\checkmark[/tex]

[tex]\text{Good luck on your assignment and enjoy your day!}[/tex]

[tex]\frak{LoveYourselfFirst:)}[/tex]

Answer:

[tex]\int k(x + 18)dx = \int kx + 18k dx[/tex] = [tex]k\frac{x^{2} }{2}[/tex] + [tex]18kx[/tex] + C where C is the constant of integration.

Step-by-step explanation:

i)it is given that the rate of change of W with respect to x is proportional to          

     x + 18. Therefore [tex]\frac{dW}{dx}[/tex] = k(x + 18) where k is a constant.

ii) Therefore [tex]\int k(x + 18)dx = \int kx + 18k dx[/tex] = [tex]k\frac{x^{2} }{2}[/tex] + [tex]18kx[/tex] + C where C is the constant of integration.

iii) the complete solution can only be found if we know the constant of proportion and also the constant of integration.

Answer:2m/s

Step-by-step explanation:

Velocity=distance÷time

Velocity=8÷4

Velocity=2m/s

The sequence is a function

Step-by-step explanation:

The sequence is given as;

[tex]A_n=A_n-1 +25[/tex]

where n is the number of months since his initial deposits, and A₀=50

The sequence is a function because its domain is a set of natural numbers.

For example,

A₁=A₀+25 =75

A₂=A₁+25=100

A₃=A₂+25=125

A₄=A₃+25=150

Learn More

Sequence:https://brainly.com/question/14005212

Keywords : saving, college, depositing, amount, money, modeled, sequence

#LearnwithBrainly

Answer:

Yes, because for each input value, , there is only one possible output value.

Step-by-step explanation:

i just did it on IM

Answer:

-1.777...

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the LCM of 18 for the denominator, these values are:

-1 7/9 -1 1/2

-32/18 -27/18 0

--------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------|-----------

So, the easy values to identify are: -31/18, -30/18, -29/18, and -28/18

All of these numbers have repeating decimals (because 9 is a factor of the denominator).

Now, you may realize that -1 3/4 is within the range specified.

-1 7/9 -1 1/2

-32/18 -27/18 0

--------------|-------------------|-------------------------------------|-----------

|

-1 3/4

-1.75

This is because -1.75 is between -1.5 and -1.7777.... Note that it is not repeating.

Upvote

•

1

Downvote

Add comment

Answer:

The correct option is c) n=5.

Therefore the solution to

[tex]3n+4=24-n[/tex]

is

[tex]n=5[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

[tex]3n+4=24-n[/tex]

To Find;

n = ?

Solution:

[tex]3n+4=24-n[/tex]      ........Given

Add + n to both the side

[tex]3n+4+ n=24-n+n\\4n+4=24[/tex]

Now Subtract 4 on both the side

[tex]4n+4-4=24-4\\4n=20[/tex]

Dividing by 4 on both side

[tex]\dfrac{4n}{4}=\dfrac{20}{4}\\\\n=5[/tex]

Therefore the solution to

[tex]3n+4=24-n[/tex]

is

[tex]n=5[/tex]

Answer: 5

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]log_{2}[/tex] 32

32 can be written in index form as 2x2x2x2x2 , which could be written as [tex]2^{5}[/tex].

[tex]log_{2}[/tex] 32 the becomes

[tex]log_{2}[/tex] [tex]2^{5}[/tex]

Which could be written as

5 [tex]log_{2}[/tex] 2

From law of logarithms;  [tex]log_{2}[/tex] 2 = 1

Therefore : 5 [tex]log_{2}[/tex] 2 = 5 x 1 = 5

Answer:

67.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Okay so I spent way to long overthinking this problem but in the end, I just used common sense to figure this one out. *it still may be wrong though...

A way to check if this is correct is dividing 67.5 by 5 and it equals to 13.5 which should make that answer correct?

Answer:

67.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Okay so I spent way to long overthinking this problem but in the end, I just used common sense to figure this one out. *it still may be wrong though...

A way to check if this is correct is dividing 67.5 by 5 and it equals to 13.5 which should make that answer correct?

The chances of it being less than 5 is 4/6

So if he spins it 150 times the chances of it landing on 5 or less than it will be: 4/6 * 150 = 100 (c)

Answer:

i think its c 100

Step-by-step explanation:

sorry if it makes no sense

Answer:

0.800

Step-by-step explanation:

its almost 0.800

Answer:

.800

If the second digit after the decimal is 50 or is over 50 you change the first digit after the decimal point to the next digit up, and make the rest of the digits after the decimal point zero. If it is lower than 50 then you do the same but keep the same first number after the decimal point.

Answer:

I think 28. Sorry if its wrong

Step-by-step explanation

The kite is a quadrilateral with 4 sides and angles. The length of line segment CD from the given kite is 28 units

The kite is a quadrilateral with 4 sides and angles.

From the given diagram,

AB = 3x + 1

BC = 22

Since AB = BC, hence;

3x + 1 = 22

3x = 22 - 1

3x = 21

x = 7

Since AD = CD = 4x, hence;

CD = 4x

CD = 4(7)

CD = 28 units

Hence the length of line segment CD from the given kite is 28 units

Learn more on kite here: https://brainly.com/question/23279609https://brainly.com/question/23279609

#SPJ2

Answer:

Jackie is incorrect.

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex] [tex]\left {x2} \atop {x2}} \right.[/tex] = [tex]\frac{6}{8}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{3}{4}[/tex] is equivalent to [tex]\frac{6}{8}[/tex] not [tex]\frac{7}{8}[/tex]

Jackie is mistaken when she claims that the fraction 7/8 is equal to 3/4. We compare the numerator (the top number) and denominator (the bottom number) of two fractions to see if they are equal.

In this instance, 3/4 has a denominator of 3 and a numerator of 4, whereas 7/8 has a numerator of 7 and a denominator of 8, respectively. The fractions cannot be equal since the numerators and denominators vary.

Two fractions must have the same numerator to denominator ratio in order for them to be equal. In this situation, 7/8 is a bigger fraction than 3/4. Jackie's assertion that 7/8 is comparable to 3/4 is therefore false.

To know more about Fraction :

https://brainly.com/question/10354322

#SPJ1.

Answer:

2x+8>12

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]x+2y=-11[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope intercept form of a line is given by:

[tex]y=mx+b[/tex]

Where

m is the slope and b is the y-intercept

Given slope is  [tex]-\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

We can write:

[tex]y=-\frac{1}{2}x+b[/tex]

Now to find b, we replace x with -3 and y with -4, given, so we have:

[tex]y=-\frac{1}{2}x+b\\-4=-\frac{1}{2}(-3)+b\\-4=\frac{3}{2}+b\\b=-5.5[/tex]

So, the equation is:

[tex]y=-\frac{1}{2}x-\frac{11}{2}[/tex]

Now,

The standard form is given by:

[tex]Ax+By=C[/tex]

So, we take x and y to left side and the constant to right side. Rearranging, we get:

[tex]y=-\frac{1}{2}x-\frac{11}{2}\\2y=-x-11\\x+2y=-11[/tex]

The first answer choice is right.

Final answer:

The equation of line b that passes through the point (-3, -4) and has a slope of -1/2 in standard form is x + 2y = -11.

Explanation:

To find the equation of line b that passes through the point (-3, -4) and has a slope of -1/2, we will start with the slope-intercept form of a line equation y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept. While we know the slope (-1/2), we do not yet have the y-intercept. We can use the given point to solve for b. Plugging the point into the equation gives -4 = (-1/2)(-3) + b, which simplifies to -4 = 3/2 + b. Solving for b yields b = -11/2.

Now we have the slope-intercept form of the line: y = (-1/2)x - 11/2. To convert this to standard form, which is Ax + By = C, we multiply through by 2 to clear the fractions, which gives us 2y = -x - 11. Rearranging this, we add x to both sides to get x + 2y = -11. Therefore the correct equation in standard form is x + 2y = -11.

the answer for this question is:

1/17

The equation of the line is [tex]5x+y-38=0[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The slope is [tex]m=-5[/tex]

Also, the line passes through the points [tex](7,3)[/tex]

To find a line with slope [tex]m=-5[/tex] that passes through the points [tex](7,3)[/tex], let us use the equation of a line with slope that passes through the point is given by [tex](y-y_{1} )=m(x-x_{1} )[/tex] where m is the slope and [tex](x_{1} ,y_{1} )[/tex] are the points [tex](7,3)[/tex].

Thus, substituting the values in the equation of a line, we get,

[tex](y-3)=-5(x-7)[/tex]

Multiplying the term [tex](x-7)[/tex] by -5, we get,

[tex]y-3=-5 x+35[/tex]

Adding both sides by 5x,

[tex]5x+y-3=35[/tex]

Subtracting 35 from both sides of the equation,

[tex]5x+y-38=0[/tex]

Thus, the equation of the line is [tex]5x+y-38=0[/tex]

hmmm first off, let's convert the decimal to a fraction, and then the mixed fraction to an improper fraction and proceed from there.

[tex]\bf 6.\underline{2}\implies \cfrac{62}{1\underline{0}}\implies \cfrac{31}{5}~\hfill \stackrel{mixed}{2\frac{1}{3}}\implies \cfrac{2\cdot 3+1}{3}\implies \stackrel{improper}{\cfrac{7}{3}} \\\\[-0.35em] ~\dotfill\\\\ 6.2\div (2x+1)=2\frac{1}{3}\div 4\implies \cfrac{31}{5}\div (2x+1) = \cfrac{7}{3}\div 4[/tex]

[tex]\bf \cfrac{31}{5}\div \cfrac{(2x+1)}{1} = \cfrac{7}{3}\div \cfrac{4}{1}\implies \cfrac{31}{5}\cdot \cfrac{1}{(2x+1)} = \cfrac{7}{3}\cdot \cfrac{1}{4}\implies \cfrac{31}{5(2x+1)}=\cfrac{7}{12} \\\\\\ \cfrac{31}{10x+5}=\cfrac{7}{12}\implies \stackrel{\textit{cross multipling}}{372 = 7(10x+5)}\implies 372=70x+35\implies 337=70x \\\\\\ \cfrac{337}{70}=x\implies 4\frac{57}{70}=x\implies 4.81\approx x[/tex]

Answer: [tex]3a\sqrt[3]{b^{7}}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

We have the following expression:

[tex]\sqrt[3]{27 a^{3} b^{7}}[/tex]

This can be rearranged as:

[tex]\sqrt[3]{27} \sqrt[3]{a^{3}} \sqrt[3]{b^{7}}[/tex]

Since [tex]\sqrt[3]{27}=3[/tex] and [tex]\sqrt[3]{a^{3}}=a[/tex] we have:

[tex]3a\sqrt[3]{b^{7}}[/tex] This is the simplest form

Answer:

3ab^2 (^3sqrt{ b}) or A on Edg. 2020

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

4x – 12 ≤ 16 + 8x; x>-7

Step-by-step explanation:

i dont remember how i did it

Answer:

x≥-7

Hope this helps

Answer: Answer is 38ft.

Step-by-step explanation: The figure that measures 10ft by 9ft is a rectangle which means two sides measure 10ft each (length) and two sides measure 9ft each (width). A perimeter simply measures all sides of the entire shape, that is;

10ft + 9ft + 10ft + 9ft = 38ft.