Different characters in literature often present conflicting versions of events, demonstrating the subjective nature of memory and perception influenced by personal, social, and emotional factors.
The question pertains to the differing accounts of events as presented by different characters, which is a common theme explored in literature. The differences in stories told by characters like Tom and Mayella, or Twyla and Roberta, in various literary texts, reflect the subjective nature of human memory and perception. They demonstrate how personal biases, emotions, and social influences can shape individual narratives. These varying accounts are often used by authors to create ambiguity, develop character complexity, and engage readers in critical thinking about truth and perspective. In the context provided, such differences could reveal depth in characters, become a pivotal plot point, or raise questions about reliability and moral judgments.
Moreover, the presence of conflicting testimonies is sometimes employed to illustrate how time and the act of oral transmission can alter stories, leading to multiple versions that may be 'hardly recognizable' from each other. This is significant in understanding the social and literary experiences that inform the retelling of events. For instance, the tale of lost ewes retold differently by characters within a story symbolizes the divergent roles they play and their contrasting worldviews.
Based on this passage, which of these is true about the Apollo 11 moon landing?
A.
It brought all families together.
B.
It marked the end of the Space Race.
C.
It was an emotional time for some people.
D.
It revitalized the country's space program.
Answer:
C.
It was an emotional time for some people.
Explanation:
Because tears ran down and it was just emotional
Answer: it was an emotional time
Explanation: 5 out of 5
Although the cost of living Hawaii is ____ Shane will pay any price live in such a _____ environment
Although the cost of living in Hawaii is expensive, Shane will pay any price to live in such a beautiful environment.
Final answer:
Despite the high cost of living in Hawaii, Shane is determined to live there, attracted by its paradisiacal setting and cultural diversity, even as tourism drives up expenses.
Explanation:
Although the cost of living in Hawaii is high, Shane is willing to pay any price to live in such a paradisiacal environment. Given its diverse cultural tapestry and the allure of cities like Honolulu and tourist hotspots like Waikīkī, O'ahu in Hawai'i has a strong pull for many individuals despite its high expenses. The island's reliance on tourism significantly contributes to both its economic success and the high living costs, which can be so high as to contribute to local issues such as poverty and homelessness.
PLZ HELP HURRY Which sentence has a pronoun-antecedent error?
A)Everyone who wants to succeed in life needs to manage his or her money.
B)When e-mail goes down, every one of the teachers holds their breath anxiously.
C)Harrison wasn't sure if his work was good enough to pull an A in his biology class.
D)The two men hadn't seen each other since graduation, so they almost didn't recognize each other.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
i think b has a error because it says every one of the teachers it doesn't make any sense
Cumberland Caverns in Tennessee is 44.4 kilometers long. This cave is
ieters long. This cave is 10.9 kilometers
longer than Carlsbad Caverns in New Mexico. How long is Carlsbad
verns!
Answer:
33.5
Explanation:
44.4-10.9= 33.5. Carlsbad verns
Carlsbad Caverns is 33.5 kilometers long, which is found by subtracting 10.9 kilometers (the length difference) from the 44.4 kilometers length of Cumberland Caverns.
To calculate the length of Carlsbad Caverns in New Mexico, we subtract the difference in length between the Cumberland Caverns and Carlsbad Caverns from the length of Cumberland Caverns:
Length of Cumberland Caverns - Difference = Length of Carlsbad Caverns
44.4 kilometers - 10.9 kilometers = 33.5 kilometers
Therefore, Carlsbad Caverns is 33.5 kilometers long.
53:51
Read the excerpts from "Take the Tortillas Out of Your Poetry" and "Speaking Arabic."
Albol
My friend had concluded that if he took his language and culture out of his poetry, he stood a better chance of
receiving a fellowship. He took out his native language, the poetic patois of our reality, the rich mixture of Spanish,
English, pachuco and street talk which we know so well. In other words, he took the tortillas out of his poetry, which
is to say he took the soul out of his poetry.
At a neighborhood fair in Texas, somewhere between the German Oom-pah Sausage Stand and the Mexican Gorditas
booth, I overheard a young man say to his friend, "I wish I had a heritage. Sometimes I feel so lonely for one." And
the tall American trees were dangling their thick branches right down over his head.
Which best states how the structures of the excerpts differ?
O
O
O
O
Anaya structures his excerpt as an anecdote, while Nye structures her excerpt as a rhetorical appeal.
Anaya structures his excerpt as an analysis, while Nye structures her excerpt as an observation
Anaya structures his excerpt as an observation, while Nye structures her excerpt as an analysis.
Anaya structures his excerpt as a rhetorical appeal, while Nye structures her excerpt as an anecdote.
Next
Submit
Mark this and return
This statement best states the difference.
Anaya structures his excerpt as an analysis, while Nye structures her excerpt as an observation
Explanation:
"Take the Tortillas Out of Your Poetry" and "Speaking Arabic." in here in the passages are talking about a very similar thing.
In "Take the Tortillas Out of Your Poetry" the poet takes away the soul of his poems by betraying the soul of the language they have inherited and writing in the same bland baritone that everyone else writes in.
In "Speaking Arabic." it is a very minute observation as the person who is speaking yearns for a culture and heritage while a veritable sign of it hangs directly overhead.
What is the single new commandment, and how is it ridiculous?
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
The single new commandment is a synthesis of the Ten Commandments into two: 'Love God' and 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' There's nothing absurd about it; instead, it is a deep and meaningful encapsulation of the law's intent.
The single new commandment referenced in the Bible is a summarization and fulfillment of the Ten Commandments into two principal commandments centered on love. These are found in Mark 12 and are articulated by Jesus. First, 'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.'
Second, 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' There is nothing inherently ridiculous about this commandment; rather, it's a profound simplification that captures the essence of the Ten Commandments.
The notion that this is ridiculous might stem from misunderstanding its all-encompassing nature, which extends beyond the letter of the law to the spirit, guiding not just external actions but the inner morals of individuals.
This new command shows a transition from the Old Law that governed actions to the New Law that directs the intent and heart behind those actions.
Mary didn't think much of Robert. When I asked her why, she said, "He has hurt my feelings more than once."
Which of the sentences uses brackets correctly?
A) Mary didn't think much of [Robert] because he had "hurt my feelings more than once."
B) Mary didn't think much of Robert because he had "hurt [my] feelings more than once."
C) Mary didn't think [much] of Robert because he had "hurt my feelings more than once."
D) Mary didn't think much of Robert because he had "hurt [her] feelings more than once."
the sentences uses brackets correctly are
C) Mary didn't think [much] of Robert because he had "hurt my feelings more than once."
B) Mary didn't think much of Robert because he had "hurt [my] feelings more than once."
Explanation:
B) Mary didn't think much of Robert because he had "hurt [my] feelings more than once."C) Mary didn't think [much] of Robert because he had "hurt my feelings more than once."The sentences within brackets are used that are not important even if they are eliminated, it will not change the meaning of a sentence.Sentences can be written without adding words in the bracket also.Answer: the answer is D on usatestprep
Explanation:
PLEASE ANSWERRRRR!!!! I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO FIIIRRSST ANSWER!!!!
What is the vocabulary meaning of a person you know, but is not a close friend????
Answer: Acquaintance
Answer:
An acquaintance would be a person you know but are not friends with. The definition of that word is "a person one knows slightly, but who is not a close friend."
Which makes a claim for an argument why students should be required to wear uniforms in school
Answer:
School uniforms would prevent parents from having to purchase expensive clothes for the kids for school.
Explanation:
Every claim should be credible, and it should be supported by arguments. To argument a claim, one should have the results of a statistic that will support the claim. Only opinions without arguments can’t be supported and credible enough.
Answer: school uniforms can be taken as “uncomfortable” or “unfashionable”
Explanation: school uniforms were made a long time ago, still keeping a particular style
We have chosen blue and yellow for the team's colors. *
Identify the verb/verb phrase that appears in each sentence.
Answer:
chosen
Explanation:
Because this is the action.
The 1997 book by Don Campbell, The Mozart Effect: Tapping the Power of Music to Heal the Body, Strengthen the Mind, and Unlock the Creative Spirit, discusses the theory that listening to Mozart (especially the piano concertos) may temporarily increase one's IQ and produce many other beneficial effects on mental function. (1) Campbell recommends playing specially selected classical music to infants, in the expectation that it will benefit their mental development. (2) Playing Mozart to animals decreases anxiety and stress and allows them to be more receptive to commands from their owners.
After The Mozart Effect, Campbell wrote a follow-up book, The Mozart Effect For Children, and created related products. (3)Among these are collections of music that he states harness the Mozart effect to enhance "deep rest and rejuvenation", "intelligence and learning", and "creativity and imagination". Campbell defines the term as "an inclusive term signifying the transformational powers of music in health, education, and well-being. (4)It represents the general use of music to reduce stress, depression, or anxiety; induce relaxation or sleep; activate the body; and improve memory or awareness. Innovative and experimental uses of music and sound can improve listening disorders, dyslexia, attention deficit disorder, autism, and other mental and physical disorders and diseases."
Which sentence is not relevant to the paragraph and should be deleted?
Answer:
B; sentence 2
Explanation:
Answer:
answer is B
Explanation:
What was the relationship during the holocaust between prejudice against jews and oppression (cruel treatment) of them?
Answer: As a result of the Nazi prejudices against them, around 6 million Jews were killed during the Holocaust.
Explanation:
During World War II, Nazi Germany believed that there are people "unworthy of life" - those people were "racially inferior", and were considered as "the enemies of the state." This included Jewish people, who were subjects of various prejudices. Nowadays, this hostility and hatred towards Jewish people is referred to as anti-semitism.
Early in the war, as a result of their deep prejudices against the Jewish people, the Nazis devised a plan called "Final Solution to the Jewish problem." The plan was to exterminate all the Jewish people. From 1939 to 1945, the Nazis physically tortured and murdered around 6 million Jews. This period is known as the Holocaust. In Nazi concentration camps, various techniques were used to murder Jews - they were starved to death, killed in gas chambers, etc.
Can someone help me with this please
Answer:
Write about the times when you just thought,"Now this is the best life anyone can ask for"
Explanation:
4. In paragraph 3, what does remonstrative mean?
a. Agreeing readily
b. Denying casually
Ignoring completely
d. Protesting profusely
Hello friend!
Your answer today will be "Protesting profusely".
The Definition of remonstrative is:
make a forcefully reproachful protest.
source from lexico powered by oxford.
Take care friend!
-Edge
Final answer:
The word remonstrative means exhibiting protest or dissent; hence, in paragraph 3, 'remonstrative' would mean 'Protesting profusely.'
Explanation:
The word remonstrative is an adjective that describes a behavior of expressing forceful protest or dissent. Given the options:
Agreeing readily
Denying casually
Ignoring completely
Protesting profusely
the correct answer is d. Protesting profusely. This is because remonstrate means to protest or complain about something, and adding the -ive turns it into an adjective that means inclined to or characterized by protest.
Makenna is writing the conclusion of her argumentative
essay about the benefits of working as a youth hospital
volunteer. She ended her essay with the conclusion
below.
oc
In conclusion, I really like working in the hospital as a
volunteer.
Answer:
“In conclusion (or could start with ultimately), I have found volunteering in the hospital to be an incredibly rewarding experience that I simply cannot resist sharing about.”
figurative language in the book between the world and me
Answer:
Coates uses the metaphor of a vessel with contents poured into it and then shattered to demonstrate the sadness and violence of Prince's death: "And think of how that vessel was taken, shattered on the concrete, and all of its holy contents, all that had gone into him, sent flowing back into the earth"
Explanation:
Which excerpt from "The Child of Urbino" best supports the claim?
Answer:
"Poor Luca was in despair. He knew very well that his chance of winning Pacifica was gone. Raphael's tender heart was touched."
why is the urge to destroy a creative urge, will mark brainliest
Answer:
Explanation:
The passion to create is the same driving emotion as the passion to destroy, but the passion to create is infinitely stronger
1. What is something that's unique to speeches and isn't featured in any other form of writing?
Answer:
you can communicate with non-verbal movements
Explanation:
What is the difference between Alice’s point of view and the Wonderland characters’ points of view in the passage?
The difference between Alice's point of view and the Wonderland characters' points of view lies in the clash between logical, real-world perspectives and illogical, fantastical perspectives. While Alice attempts to understand Wonderland through her own logical framework, the characters of Wonderland operate under a logic that is entirely their own, leading to misunderstandings and a sense of absurdity.
The difference between Alice's point of view and the Wonderland characters' points of view in Alice in Wonderland centers on differing perspectives of reality and logic. Alice, coming from the real world, approaches Wonderland with a sense of curiosity yet tries to make sense of the nonsensical with her understanding of logic and order. The Wonderland characters, on the other hand, operate within their own set of rules and logic that seem absurd to Alice.
Alice's perspective is grounded in the real world's logic. For instance, when she falls down the rabbit hole, she worries about what might happen at the bottom and even considers if she might fall right through the Earth. This practical and somewhat scientific curiosity reveals her grounding in reality.
Conversely, the Wonderland characters, such as the Cheshire Cat's vanishing act or the Hatter's timeless tea party, demonstrate a reality that defies normal logic and physics. These characters and their actions do not concern themselves with the practical implications their behaviors would have in Alice's world but follow the inherent logic of Wonderland, which is based on whimsical possibilities and contradictions.
This fundamental difference in viewpoint leads to much of the conflict and misunderstanding between Alice and the Wonderland inhabitants, as both sides struggle to understand the other's perspective. While Alice at times tries to apply her own logic to Wonderland, the residents operate under a multitude of logic that is, to Alice, paradoxical and bewildering. Therefore, the key difference between Alice's and the characters' points of view is the clash between a logical, real-world perspective and an illogical, fantastical perspective.
Which word is part of an infinitive?
A. Images
B. Dreamt
C. Keep
D. Losing
In the book the giver what are five of the rules of the community
Answer:
Here are 5:
Children are not allowed to ride bikes before they become 9s.
Public apologies are required for causes interruptions to normal schedules.
Objects are not to be removed from the recreation area and snacks are to be eaten not hoarded.
Two Children-one male,one female-to each family unit.
At the ceremony of 8s, children have their comfort objects taken away.
Hope i helped! ^-^
Final answer:
In The Giver, the community enforces rules like no lying, adhering to curfews, specific family unit compositions, obligatory sharing of feelings, and assigned jobs at twelve to maintain order and suppress individuality.
Explanation:
In The Giver by Lois Lowry, the community follows stringent rules designed to maintain sameness and control over its inhabitants. Some of these rules include:
Individuals may not lie.
Citizens must adhere to assigned curfews.
Each family unit must consist of one male and one female parent, and precisely two children (one male and one female).
Feelings and dreams must be shared every morning and evening in family units.
Upon turning twelve, children are assigned their lifelong jobs by the Community.
These rules are essential in suppressing individuality and emotions, ensuring that the community remains orderly and predictable. The absence of choice and the imposed conformity highlight the dystopian nature of what initially appears to be a utopian society.
Read the conversation.
CHAIRMAN REED. I’d like to call this meeting to order. Mr. Hollembeak, your willingness to meet with us today speaks to your openness and integrity in this investigation. I am looking forward to an honest and candid discussion. Members of the committee, please remember that we will reconvene in a closed session at 2 p.m. today to take a vote. Please hold your comments and questions until each statement has been read. Mrs. Louis, please begin.
MRS. LOUIS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I begin by referring to my colleague’s November 22nd testimony that the files being discussed were not properly encrypted and that their security may have been compromised. Were you aware of this at the time?
MR. HOLLEMBEAK. I was not aware. Based on the findings of an internal review board that I established after my appointment in 2016, I concluded that my department’s security protocol was up to date.
MRS. LOUIS. I understand that you released a report of your findings on February 15th of last year. Am I correct?
MR. HOLLEMBEAK. You are correct.
CHAIRMAN REED. Do you have a copy of this report with you, Mr. Hollembeak?
MR. HOLLEMBEAK. I do. I have it here.
CHAIRMAN REED. Submitted for the record, Mr. Hollembeak’s security report, dated February 15, 2016.
Read the conversation.
CHAIRMAN REED. I’d like to call this meeting to order. Mr. Hollembeak, your willingness to meet with us today speaks to your openness and integrity in this investigation. I am looking forward to an honest and candid discussion. Members of the committee, please remember that we will reconvene in a closed session at 2 p.m. today to take a vote. Please hold your comments and questions until each statement has been read. Mrs. Louis, please begin.
MRS. LOUIS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I begin by referring to my colleague’s November 22nd testimony that the files being discussed were not properly encrypted and that their security may have been compromised. Were you aware of this at the time?
MR. HOLLEMBEAK. I was not aware. Based on the findings of an internal review board that I established after my appointment in 2016, I concluded that my department’s security protocol was up to date.
MRS. LOUIS. I understand that you released a report of your findings on February 15th of last year. Am I correct?
MR. HOLLEMBEAK. You are correct.
CHAIRMAN REED. Do you have a copy of this report with you, Mr. Hollembeak?
MR. HOLLEMBEAK. I do. I have it here.
CHAIRMAN REED. Submitted for the record, Mr. Hollembeak’s security report, dated February 15, 2016.
What kind of moderator is Chairman Reed?
A. Effective. Chairman Reed is reminding participants of the rules for discussion, acknowledging Mr. Hollembeak’s point of view, and asking him to support his point of view with facts.
B. Effective. Chairman Reed is keeping the discussion on topic by preventing other board members from participating and by challenging Mr. Hollembeak’s claim by demanding proof.
C. Ineffective. Chairman Reed is not following the rules for discussion that he lays out in his opening statement, and he is not properly staying on topic.
D. Ineffective. Chairman Reed is not allowing the other board members to share their points of view, and he is not following the discussion rules.
The kind of moderator to which Chairman Reed belongs would be:
A). Effective. Chairman Reed is reminding participants of the rules for discussion, acknowledging Mr. Hollembeak's point of view, and asking him to support his point of view with facts.
An effective moderator is described as an individual who heads the meeting or group and functions to ensure the success and efficacy of the process. He/she is required to possess good communication, collaboration, and leadership skills in order to allow each member of the group to take part in the interaction and respect their viewpoint. He/she is also responsible to tell or recall the group members regarding the norms, appropriate behavior, or required details to validate one's claim to ensure the effectiveness of the discussion. Since Chairman Reed displays all these characteristics, he is an effective moderator as he is aware of his responsibilities and fulfills them positively.Thus, option A is the correct answer.
Learn more about 'Moderator' here:
brainly.com/question/14296406
Chairman Reed is an effective moderator in this situation. The correct option is a.
Explanation:Based on the provided conversation, Chairman Reed commences the meeting in an orderly manner, stating the rules for the session.
He acknowledges Mr. Hollembeak's willingness to participate in the investigation and maintains an environment that promotes factual discussion.
He does this by asking Mr. Hollembeak to present evidence in support of his viewpoint, thus reminding participants of the importance of input backed by facts.
Learn more about Meeting Moderation here:https://brainly.com/question/31265172
#SPJ3
What is the defenition of a demagogue
Answer:
A demagogue is a political leader who seeks support by appealing to the desires and prejudices of ordinary people instead of using a rational argument.
Hope this helps and if it did, please mark as brainliest.
Answer:a political leader who seeks support by appealing to the desires and prejudices of ordinary people rather than by using rational argument.
Explanation:
All visible color comes from __________ light.
Which of the following defines various colors by blending certain amounts of red green and blue.
A. Color
B hexadecimal
C. HTML color codes
D. Rgb color models
D. RGB color models
The "RGB" stands for red, green, and blue!
Select the correct answer.
Which of these best describes why Sebastian's dialogue is considered a soliloquy?
A.
It reveals that Sebastian expects one thing to happen, but something entirely different happens.
B.
It contrasts what Sebastian thinks to be true with what the audience knows to be true.
C.
It moves the plot forward, foreshadows the end, and creates a tragic mood in the play.
D.
It shows the audience Sebastian's inner thoughts and is not meant to be heard by other characters.
Answers
A. on plato It shows the audience Sebastian's inner thoughts and is not meant to be heard by other characters.
Explanation:
correct on plato
The statement that best illustrates that why Sebastian's dialogue is considered a soliloquy is It reveals that Sebastian expects one thing to happen, but something entirely different happens. Thus, option A is correct.
What is soliloquy?A soliloquy is a discourse directed at oneself, in which thoughts are spoken aloud without addressing anybody else. In play, soliloquies are used to allow a character to make their ideas known to the audience, address it directly, or take it into their confidence.
It indicates that Sebastian anticipates one thing to happen, but something altogether unexpected happens. This is why Sebastian's discourse is termed a soliloquy. As a result, option A is correct.
Learn more about soliloquy here:
https://brainly.com/question/29316723
#SPJ3
Read the following sentence:
I should have used my mind-reading skills to figure out
what she wanted me to do.
To change the tone of the sentence from sarcastic to neutral, which word
most needs to be replaced?
A. used
B. figure
C. wanted
D. mind-reading
Answer:
D. mind-reading
Explanation:
If you replace "used," "figure," or "wanted," the sentence still has the same "sarcastic" tone.
To change the tone of the sentence from sarcastic to neutral, "mind-reading" most needs to be replaced. Thus, option D is the correct option.
To change the tone of the sentence from sarcastic to neutral, the word "mind-reading" should be replaced. The term "mind-reading" implies a supernatural or sarcastic ability to know someone's thoughts, which can be perceived as insincere or mocking. To maintain a neutral tone, a more ordinary and straightforward term should be used. For instance:
"I should have used my intuition to figure out what she wanted me to do."
By substituting "mind-reading" with "intuition," the sentence loses its sarcastic overtone and becomes a neutral statement about trying to understand someone's wishes without any sarcastic implication.
Thus, option D is the correct option.
Learn more about sarcastic here:
https://brainly.com/question/30492814
#SPJ7
Biotechnology has many potential benefits. The risks outweigh these benefits.”
Which is the best way to rewrite the second sentence?
Additionally, the risks outweigh these benefits.
As a result, the risks outweigh these benefits.
However, the risks outweigh the benefits.
Answer:
However, the risks outweigh the benefits.
Explanation:
The essential message of the second sentence is one contradictory in nature to that which precedes it.
The best way to rewrite the sentence "The risk outweighs the benefits" is "However, the risks outweigh the benefits". Therefore, Option (D) is the correct option.
What is biotechnology?The word biotechnology is made from two words that are bio and technology, which infers that biotechnology means technology that is based on biology.
Biotechnology has huge potential benefits however the risks it involves outweigh those benefits. Therefore, (D) is the correct option.
To know more about biotechnology, visit the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/15821448
#SPJ2
can someone please write me a summary of the vietnam war? please make it your own words all you have to do is explain when it happened and why and all about it :)
Answer:
War between the communist government of north Vietnam and South Vietnam, with the United States as it's principal ally. The dates of the war was from 1955 until 1975. The United States entered the war in 1965 and began withdrawing troops in 1973. The United States had a huge number of casualties and it is considered one of the deadliest wars. There are mixed answers as to who won this war when you review history books.
Explanation: