Bobby created a dilution of 1/100 of a bacterial sample by adding 1 mL of sample to 99 mL of saline. Unfortunately, after Bobby completed the dilution, he knocked the container over spilling the majority of the diluted sample out. After cleaning up the mess, he found he had 19 mL of diluted sample remaining. Can he still completed the microbial count and if so, then write out the steps on how would he determine the original cell concentration of his total remaining samp

Final answer:

The estimated pKa of the weak monoprotic acid is 3.42, as this value is equal to the pH at the halfway point to the equivalence point during a titration with a strong base where the amounts of the weak acid and its conjugate base are equal.

Explanation:

The question addresses the titration of a weak monoprotic acid with a strong base and involves finding the pKa of the acid using pH measurements.

To estimate the pKa of the weak acid, we use the information that at the halfway point of the titration (when half the equivalent amount of base has been added), the pH of the solution equals the pKa of the acid. This is because, at the halfway point, the concentrations of the acid (HA) and its conjugate base (A-) are equal.

Given that 25.0 mL of 0.100 M NaOH is the halfway point since it takes 50.0 mL of NaOH to reach the equivalence point, and the pH at this stage is 3.42, we can directly say that the pKa of the weak acid is approximately 3.42.

This is because at the halfway point of the titration, the amount of acid that has been neutralized by the base is equal to the amount of acid that remains un-neutralized. In such a scenario, according to the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation:

pH = pKa + log([A-]/[HA]) and since [A-] = [HA] at the halfway point, we get:

Thus, the estimated pKa value of the weak acid is 3.42.

Calculating the final molarity of iodide anion in the solution, convert the grams of iron (II) iodide to moles, convert the volume of the silver nitrate solution to liters, use the stoichiometry of the reaction, calculate the moles of iodide anion, and divide the moles by the final volume of the solution.

To calculate the final molarity of iodide anion in the solution, we need to use the stoichiometry of the reaction between iron (II) iodide and silver nitrate. Given that there is 0.981 g of iron (II) iodide and 150 mL of a 35.0 mM aqueous solution of silver nitrate, we can determine the moles of iron (II) iodide and the moles of iodide anion produced. Finally, we can calculate the final molarity of iodide anion by dividing the moles by the final volume of the solution.

https://brainly.com/question/32902118

#SPJ3

The sphingolipid is the lipid with this composition.

Option: C

Explanation:

The complex lipid with  one mole of fatty acid per mole of inorganic phosphate has been Sphingolipid. Thus, option C is correct.

The lipids are biomolecules with the ability to bind with the nonpolar surfaces. The lipids have been bound with other biomolecules to form complex lipids.

Thus, the complex lipid with  one mole of fatty acid per mole of inorganic phosphate has been Sphingolipid. Thus, option C is correct.

For more information about lipids, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/233734

Explanation:

Spilling room temperature water over your skin on a hot day will cook the body down. This is because water has a low heat of vapourization( water can evaporate into gas molecules easily). This evaporation causes a cooling effect on the skin surface and it requires heat energy as liquid is converted to gas. This is a typical example of an endothermic process. BUT spilling vegetable oil of the same temperature as the water over the skin will not cool the body down because oil has a high heat of vapourization and doesn't evaporate because it is a viscous liquid and the molecules are tightly bound to each other. I hope this helps.

Hygroscopic nature of NaOH is the main reason for the lower concentration of the sodium hydroxide in the solution.

Explanation:

The main reason for the lower concentration of the sodium hydroxide in the solution is Hygroscopic nature of NaOH.

It's obviously true that Sodium hydroxide pellets are hygroscopic in nature, which plainly implies that the sodium hydroxide pellets retains dampness from the air, so it becomes deliquescent. Whenever the NaOH precious stones are gauged, the gems assimilate dampness from the environmental factors, thus the heaviness of the gems might change, so the centralization of the arrangement was lower than the expected one. So it is absurd to expect to get ready NaOH arrangement under ordinary room temperature. In this way, while setting up the arrangement of NaOH we must be more cautious.

Find more information about Sodium hydroxide here:

brainly.com/question/25597694

Answer:

Mg and Zn

Explanation:

In cathodic protection, the sacrificial anode corrodes instead of the cathode which it protects. The anode is usually higher than the cathode in the electrochemical series. This also means that the reduction potential of the sacrificial anode is more negative than that of the cathode. Consider the reduction potentials of the metals listed in the question:

Mg=-1.185V

Zn= -0.7618V

Ag= +0.7996V

Au= +1.629V

Ni= -0.251V

The reduction potential of the cathode stated in the question is -0.447V hence only magnesium and zinc can function as sacrificial anode.

The metals that can be used as sacrificial anodes in the cathodic protection of an underground steel storage tank are silver (Ag), magnesium (Mg), nickel (Ni), and zinc (Zn).

The metals that can be used as sacrificial anodes in the cathodic protection of an underground steel storage tank are the ones with a lower standard reduction potential (E°) than steel. In this case, we need to compare the reduction potentials of steel to the standard reduction potentials of the given metals.

Therefore, the metals that could be used as sacrificial anodes in the cathodic protection of an underground steel storage tank are silver (Ag), magnesium (Mg), nickel (Ni), and zinc (Zn).

https://brainly.com/question/32659293

#SPJ11

Answer:

We need 3910.5 joules of energy

Explanation:

Step 1: Data given

Mass of aluminium = 110 grams

Initial temperature = 52.0 °C

Final temperature = 91.5 °C

Specific heat of aluminium = 0.900 J/g°C

Step 2: Calculate energy required

Q = m*c*ΔT

⇒with Q = the energy required = TO BE DETERMINED

⇒with m = the mass of aluminium = 110 grams

⇒with c = the specific heat of aluminium = 0.900 J/g°C

⇒with ΔT = the change in temperature = T2 - T1 = 91.5 °C - 52.0 °C = 39.5 °C

Q = 110 grams * 0.900 J/g°C * 39.5

Q = 3910.5 J

We need 3910.5 joules of energy

Answer:

[tex]COD=2030\frac{mg}{L}[/tex]

Explanation:

Hello,

In this case, considering the given information the redox reaction is:

[tex]Fe^{+2}+Cr_2O_7^{-2}\rightarrow Fe^{+3}+Cr^{+3}[/tex]

Which properly balanced turns out:

[tex]Fe^{+2}\rightarrow Fe^{+3}+1e^-\\Cr^{+6}_2O_7^{-2}+14H^++6e^-\rightarrow 2Cr^{+3}+7H_2O\\\\\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \downarrow\\6Fe^{+2}+Cr_2O_7^{-2}+14H^+\rightarrow 6Fe^{+3}+2Cr^{+3}+7H_2O[/tex]

In such a way, one sees a 6 to 1 molar relationship between the standard iron (II) solution and the dichromate, therefore, by using the following equation it is possible to determine the oxygen as shown below:

[tex]n_{Fe^{+2}}=n_{Cr_2O_7^{-2}}[/tex]

Thus, the moles of iron (II) solution are:

[tex]n_{Fe^{+2}}=0.1511\frac{molFe^{+2}}{L_{sln}}*0.02684L_{sln}=0.00406molFe^{+2}[/tex]

Moreover, the moles of dichormate result:

[tex]n_{Cr_2O_7^{-2}}=0.00406molFe^{+2}*\frac{1molCr_2O_7^{-2}}{6molFe^{+2}}=6.76x10^{-4}}molCr_2O_7^{-2}[/tex]

Thereby, the volume of the sample is:

[tex]V_{sample}=\frac{n_{Cr_2O_7^{-2}}}{M_{Cr_2O_7^{-2}}}=\frac{6.76x10^{-4}molCr_2O_7^{-2}}{0.0181\frac{molCr_2O_7^{-2}}{L_{sln}} } =0.0373L_{sample}[/tex]

Finally, the chemical oxygen demand result:

[tex]COD=6.76x10^{-4}molCr_2O_7^{-2}*\frac{7molO}{1molCr_2O_7^{-2}}*\frac{16gO}{1molO}*\frac{1000mgO}{1gO}*\frac{1}{0.0373L_{sln}} \\COD=2030\frac{mg}{L}[/tex]

Best regards.

Answer:

Theoretical yield=0.764 g.

Percent yield 42%.

Explanation:

Hello,

In this case the undergoing chemical reaction is shown on the attached picture. In such a way, starting by the given mass of 2-naphtol, one computes the theoretical yielded grams of 2-butoxynaphthalene as shown below, considering their 1 to 1 molar relationship:

[tex]m_{2-butoxynaphthalene}=0.55g2-naphtol*\frac{1mol2-naphtol}{144.17g2-naphtol}*\frac{1mol2-butoxynaphthalene}{1mol2-naphtol}*\frac{200.28g2-butoxynaphthalene}{1mol2-butoxynaphthalene}=0.764g2-butoxynaphthalene[/tex]

Moreover, the percent yield turns out:

[tex]Y=\frac{0.32g}{0.764g}*100\% =42\%[/tex]

Best regards.

Without the balanced chemical equation and molar masses, the theoretical yield of 2-butoxynaphthalene cannot be calculated. Normally, it involves stoichiometric calculations from the starting material. Percent yield is obtained by dividing actual yield by theoretical yield and multiplying by 100%.

To calculate the theoretical yield and percent yield for the given reaction, we need to perform a few stoichiometric calculations. However, without the balanced chemical equation and the molar masses, we cannot calculate the theoretical yield for the specific reaction of 2-naphthol and 1-bromobutane to form 2-butoxynaphthalene. If we had the balanced equation, we would calculate the moles of 2-naphthol used, and using stoichiometry, find the moles of 2-butoxynaphthalene that could be formed. Multiplying by the molar mass would give us the theoretical yield in grams. To find percent yield, we would then divide the actual yield (0.32 g) by the theoretical yield and multiply by 100.

Generally speaking, percent yield is the ratio of the actual yield to the theoretical yield multiplied by 100%. It indicates the efficiency of a chemical reaction and can be decreased by incomplete reactions, side reactions, or product recovery losses.

Answer:

Answer for the question:

You replicate the CEC analysis of a secondary alcohol you performed in the lab using a reverse phase TLC plate producing the TLC plate below. Based on this TLC plate and the mnemonic in your notes, what can you conclude about the stereochemistry of the alcohol? (1 pts)

is given below which explains the best option for the answer.

Explanation:

The enantiomer of the alcohol cannot be determined.

Answer:

[tex]9.044\times 10^{-3}[/tex] is the value of the equilibrium constant for this reaction at 756 K.

Explanation:

[tex]COCl_2\rightleftharpoons CO+Cl_2[/tex]

Equilibrium concentration of [tex]COCl_2[/tex]

[tex][COCl_2]=7.40\times 10^{-4} M[/tex]

Equilibrium concentration of [tex]CO[/tex]

[tex][CO]=3.76\times 10^{-2} M[/tex]

Equilibrium concentration of [tex]Cl_2[/tex]

[tex][Cl_2]=1.78\times 10^{-4} M[/tex]

The expression of an equilibrium constant can be written as;

[tex]K_c=\frac{[CO][Cl_2]}{[COCl_2]}[/tex]

[tex]=\frac{3.76\times 10^{-2}\times 1.78\times 10^{-4}}{7.40\times 10^{-4}}[/tex]

[tex]K_c=9.044\times 10^{-3}[/tex]

[tex]9.044\times 10^{-3}[/tex] is the value of the equilibrium constant for this reaction at 756 K.

The rate law for the overall reaction derived from a two-step reaction mechanism is determined by the slowest (rate-determining) step. In this case, the rate law would be rate = k * K_eq * [A]^2[B], where k is the rate constant for the slow step, K_eq is the equilibrium constant for the fast step, and [A] and [B] represent the concentrations of A and B, respectively.

In the context of chemistry, one step in a multistep reaction mechanism is often significantly slower than the others. This slow step is known as the rate-determining step or the rate-limiting step. The reaction cannot proceed faster than this slowest step.

In your specific example, the given mechanism consists of two steps. The rate law for each step is generally expressed in terms of the concentration of the reactants involved in that step.

For Step 1 (A + B ⇄ C), assuming that the reaction reaches an equilibrium, the concentrations of A, B, and C would remain constant over time, and won't affect the overall rate. Therefore, we would ignore this step when deriving the rate law for the overall reaction.

On the other hand, Step 2 (C + A ⟶ D) is the slow step, and thus determines the rate of the overall reaction. The rate law for this step would be rate = k * [C][A]. But since C is also a product of Step 1, we need to express C in terms of A and B. From equilibrium of Step 1, we know [C] = K_eq*[A][B] (where K_eq is equilibrium constant).

Substituting this in rate law of step 2, we get rate = k * K_eq * [A]^2[B] for the overall reaction.

https://brainly.com/question/35884538

#SPJ12

The rate law for the overall reaction 2A + B ⟶ D, considering Step 2 is the rate-determining step, is calculated by using the equilibrium from Step 1 to express the concentration of intermediate C in terms of A and B. After substitution and simplification, the rate law for the overall reaction is rate = k [A]²[B], indicating second-order dependence on A and first-order dependence on B.

To determine the rate law for the overall reaction, we must look at the mechanism provided. Since Step 2, which involves the conversion of C and A to D, is the rate-determining step, the rate law for the overall reaction will reflect this slowest step. However, since C is an intermediate that we cannot measure directly, we must use the equilibrium established in Step 1 to express the concentration of C in terms of the concentrations of A and B.

Assuming Step 1 is at equilibrium, the rate of the forward reaction is equal to the rate of the reverse reaction, and thus:

Rate of forward reaction (k₁ [A][B]) = Rate of reverse reaction (k₁₁ [C])

We can rearrange this to solve for [C]:

[C] = k₁/k₁₁ [A][B]

Now, since the rate-determining step is Step 2, we write the rate law based on this step:

rate = k₂ [C][A]

Substituting in the expression for [C] gives us:

rate = k₂ (k₁/k₁₁ [A][B])[A]

rate = (k₂ * k₁/k₁₁) [A]²[B]

Thus, after simplifying and combining the rate constants into a single overall rate constant (k), we have:

rate = k [A]²[B]

This shows that the reaction is second order with respect to A and first order with respect to B.

https://brainly.com/question/35884538

#SPJ3

Answer:

Not D

Explanation:

Answer:

13.5 g

Explanation:

This question is solved easily if we remember that the number of moles is obtained by dividing the mass into the atomic weight or molar mass depending if we are referring to elements or molecules.

Therefore, the mass of aluminum in the reaction will the 0.050 mol Al times the atomic weight of aluminum.

number of moles = n = mass of Al / Atomic Weight Al

⇒ mass Al = n x Atomic Weight Al = 0.050 mol x 27 g mol⁻¹

                                                         = 13.5 g

We have three significant figures in 0.050 and therefore we should have three significant figures in our answer.

Mass of aluminum that participated in the chemical reaction is 1.35 grams.

Number of Moles:

Number of moles is defined as the ratio of given mass to the molar mass.

Given:

Moles of Aluminum = 0.050 moles

To find:

Mass of Aluminum=?

As we know, Molar mass of Aluminum = 27g/mol

On substituting the values:

[tex]\text{Number of Moles}=\frac{\text{Given mass}}{\text{Molar mass}} \\\\ \text{Given mass}= \text{Number of Moles}*\text{Molar mass}\\\\ \text{Given mass}= 0.050*27\\\\ \text{Given mass}=1.35\text{ grams}[/tex]

Thus, the mass of aluminum that participated in the chemical reaction is 1.35 grams.

Learn more:

brainly.com/question/21911991

Answer:

40:1  is the ratio of the magenta phenolphthalein concentration to the colorless phenolphthalein concentration.

Explanation:

To calculate the pH of acidic buffer, we use the equation given by Henderson Hasselbalch:

[tex]pH=pK_a+\log(\frac{[salt]}{[acid]})[/tex]

[tex]pH=pK_a+\log(\frac{[magenta(Php)]}{[Php]})[/tex]

We are given:

[tex]pK_a[/tex] = negative logarithm of acid dissociation constant of phenolphthalein = 9.40

[tex][magenta(Php)][/tex] = concentration of magenta phenolphthalein

[tex][Php][/tex] = concentration of colorless phenolphthalein

pH = 11

Putting values in above equation, we get:

[tex]11=9.40+\log(\frac{[magenta(Php)]}{[Php]})[/tex]

[tex]\log(\frac{[magenta(Php)]}{[Php]})=11-9.40=1.6[/tex]

[tex]\frac{[magenta(Php)]}{[Php]}=10^{1.6}=39.81 :1 \approx 40:1[/tex]

40:1  is the ratio of the magenta phenolphthalein concentration to the colorless phenolphthalein concentration.

Answer:

135 mile marker will the car reach after 2 hours.

Explanation:

Speed of the car = 55 mile/hour

Distance covered in 2 hours = d

[tex]Speed=\frac{Distance}{Time}[/tex]

[tex]55 mile/hour=\frac{d}{2 hour}[/tex]

[tex]d=55 mile/hour\times 2 hour=110 mile[/tex]

The direction of the car is in decreasing marker numbers which mienas that car had started from end where 145 mile marker was present.

So, the marker appearing after travelling 2 hours will be:

145 - 110 = 135

135 mile marker will the car reach after 2 hours.

Answer:

The answer is (D) Two molar equivalents of cyclopentadiene can react with one molar equivalent of p‑benzoquinone.

Explanation:

The reaction between p-benzoquinone and cyclopentadiene is a 1,4-cyclo-addition reaction, will follow the general 4n+2 π electrons rule  of reaction between a dienophile and a diene.

Hence, two moles of cyclopentadiene added to p-benzoquinone will result in two possible isomers of cis endo and exo adducts (open and closed rings).  

Only reaction conditions can be varied to effect yield increase.

Final answer:

The correct statement regarding the stoichiometry of the Diels-Alder reaction of cyclopentadiene with p-benzoquinone is that one molar equivalent of p-benzoquinone reacts with one molar equivalent of cyclopentadiene, highlighting its [4+2] cycloaddition character and specificity.

Explanation:

Considering the Diels–Alder reaction of cyclopentadiene with p-benzoquinone, the correct statement about the stoichiometry of this reaction is: B. One molar equivalent of p-benzoquinone can react with only one molar equivalent of cyclopentadiene. The Diels-Alder reaction is characterized as a [4+2] cycloaddition, where a conjugated diene (cyclopentadiene) interacts with a dienophile (p-benzoquinone) to form a six-membered cyclic compound. This reaction is highly selective and stereospecific, generally taking place between one mole of diene and one mole of dienophile to produce a distinct cyclohexene derivative without creating long polymer chains or requiring multiple moles of either reactant.

The reaction's selectivity and efficiency contribute to its widespread use in synthetic organic chemistry, particularly in the synthesis of complex molecules and natural products. The process does not favor the formation of polymers or the interaction of uneven molar equivalents of reactants, making option B the correct choice for its stoichiometry.

Answer: a. [tex]2NO_2(g)\rightarrow N_2O_4(g)[/tex]: [tex]\Delta S[/tex] is negative

b. [tex]CaCO_3(s)+2HCl(aq)\rightarrow CaCl_2(aq)+H_2O(l)[/tex] : [tex]\Delta S[/tex] is negative

c. [tex]Ag^+(aq)+Cl^-(aq)\rightarrow AgCl(s)[/tex]: [tex]\Delta S[/tex] is negative

Explanation:

Entropy is the measure of randomness or disorder of a system. If a system moves from  an ordered arrangement to a disordered arrangement, the entropy is said to decrease and vice versa

a)  [tex]2NO_2(g)\rightarrow N_2O_4(g)[/tex]

In this reaction 2 moles of gaseous reactants are converting to 1 mole of gaseous products. The randomness will decrease and hence entropy will also decrease. Thus [tex]\Delta S[/tex] is negative.

b) [tex]CaCO_3(s)+2HCl(aq)\rightarrow CaCl_2(aq)+H_2O(l)[/tex]

In this reaction solid reactants are converting to aqueous products. The randomness will increase and hence entropy will also increase. Thus [tex]\Delta S[/tex] is positive.

c) [tex]Ag^+(aq)+Cl^-(aq)\rightarrow AgCl(s)[/tex]

In this reaction aqueous reactants are converting to solid products. The randomness will decrease and hence entropy will also decrease. Thus [tex]\Delta S[/tex] is negative

The sign of ΔS° for the given reactions can be determined based on the change in the number of moles of gas. In general, an increase in the number of moles of gas results in a positive ΔS°, while a decrease in the number of moles of gas results in a negative ΔS°.

ΔS° represents the change in entropy. To predict the sign of ΔS° for a reaction, we can consider the number of moles of gas formed or consumed. In general, an increase in the number of moles of gas will result in a positive ΔS°, indicating an increase in entropy. On the other hand, a decrease in the number of moles of gas will result in a negative ΔS°, indicating a decrease in entropy.

In the reaction 2NO2(g) → N2O4(g), the number of moles of gas decreases from 2 to 1. Therefore, ΔS° for this reaction is expected to be negative.

In the reaction CaCO3(s) + 2HCl(aq) → CaCl2(aq) + H2O(l) + CO2(g), the number of moles of gas increases from 0 to 1. Therefore, ΔS° for this reaction is expected to be positive.

In the reaction Ag+(aq) + Cl-(aq) → AgCl(s), the number of moles of gas remains the same. Therefore, ΔS° for this reaction is expected to be close to zero.

Answer : The compartment that has the higher osmotic pressure is, 10 % (m/v) starch solution.

Explanation :

Formula used for osmotic pressure :

[tex]\pi=\frac{nRT}{V}\\\\\pi=\frac{wRT}{MV}[/tex]

where,

= osmotic pressure

V = volume of solution

R = solution constant  = 0.0821 L.atm/mole.K

T= temperature of solution = [tex]25^oC=273+25=298K  [/tex]

M = molar mass of solute

w = mass of solute

Now we have to determine the osmotic pressure for the following solution.

For 1 % (m/v) starch solution :

1 % (m/v) starch solution means that 1 grams of starch present in 100 mL or 0.1 L of solution.

Molar mass of starch = 692.7 g/mol

[tex]\pi=\frac{(1g)\times (0.0821Latm/moleK)\times (298K)}{(692.7g/mol)\times (0.1L)}[/tex]

[tex]\pi=0.353atm[/tex]

For 10 % (m/v) starch solution :

10 % (m/v) starch solution means that 10 grams of starch present in 100 mL or 0.1 L of solution.

Molar mass of starch = 692.7 g/mol

[tex]\pi=\frac{(10g)\times (0.0821Latm/moleK)\times (298K)}{(692.7g/mol)\times (0.1L)}[/tex]

[tex]\pi=3.53atm[/tex]

From this we conclude that, 10 % (m/v) starch solution has the higher osmotic pressure as compared to 1 % (m/v) starch solution.

Hence, the compartment that has the higher osmotic pressure is, 10 % (m/v) starch solution.

The 10% (m/v) starch solution will have a higher osmotic pressure compared to the 1% (m/v) starch solution because osmotic pressure increases with solute concentration.

The osmotic pressure is a property that depends on the solute concentration in a solution. In comparing a 1% (m/v) starch solution to a 10% (m/v) starch solution, the solution with the higher solute concentration is the one with higher osmotic pressure. Therefore, the 10% (m/v) starch solution will have a higher osmotic pressure because it has a greater concentration of starch molecules.

The osmotic pressure of a solution can be calculated using the formula Π = MRT, where Π is the osmotic pressure, M is the molarity of the solution, R is the gas constant, and T is the temperature in Kelvin. As solute concentration increases, so does the osmotic pressure, provided that temperature and the gas constant remain the same. Consequently, hypertonic solutions will have higher osmotic pressure than hypotonic solutions.

Answer:

The rate of the over all reaction is ;

[tex]R=K[A_2]^{1/2}[B][/tex]

Explanation:

Step 1 : [tex]A_2\rightleftharpoons 2 A[/tex] fast

Step 2  : [tex]A + B\rightarrow AB[/tex] slow

Equilibrium constant of the reaction in step 1:

[tex]K_1=\frac{[A]^2}{[A_2]}[/tex]....[1]

Overall reaction:

[tex]A_2 + 2 B \rightarrow 2 AB[/tex]

When there is a chemical reaction which taking place in more than 1 step than the rate of the over all reaction is determined by the slowest step occurring during that process;

Here step 2 is slow step, so the rate of the reaction will be;

[tex]R=k[A][B][/tex]..[2]

Putting value of [A] from [1] in [2]:

[tex]R=k\times \sqrt{K_1\times [A_2]}\times [B][/tex]

[tex]K=k\times (K_1)^{1/2}[/tex]

K = rate constant of the reaction

The rate of the over all reaction is ;

[tex]R=K[A_2]^{1/2}[B][/tex]

The overall rate law for the given reaction mechanism is first order in A* (generated from A2) and first order in B, leading to an overall rate law of rate = k[A*][B], with k being the rate constant.

The rate law for a chemical reaction can be determined based on the mechanism of the reaction and the rate-determining step. Considering the given mechanism, where A2 dissociates into 2 A rapidly, and then A reacts with B to form AB slowly, the slow step is the rate-determining step. Therefore, the reaction is first order with respect to A* (generated from A2) and first order with respect to B. This is because the slow step involves one molecule of A* and one molecule of B. The overall reaction rate would be expressed as rate = k[A*][B], where k is the rate constant. If we assume the steady state approximation applies, A2 rapidly reaches a steady concentration of A*, and thus its concentration does not directly figure into the rate law for the slow step.

Answer:

Explanation:

Heat is a kind of energy.

The kinetic theory relates the heat with the movement of the particles: the more the particles move, the larger the kinetic energy of the system. The kinetic theory states that heat is the kinetic energy of the particles, atoms or molecules, in a substance, that is transferred from a substance at higher temperature to other substance at lower temperature.

Based on that principle, the kinetic theory explains the changes of phases of the substances in terms of the motion of the particles: the hotter an object the faster the particles move, the more energetic the particles are, and they occupy more space. Thus, when a solid is heated, the particles move faster and it can pass to liquid or gaseous state.

Answer:

If carbonyl oxygen of 4-hydroxypentanal is enriched with [tex]O^{18}[/tex], then the oxygen label appears in the water .

Explanation:

Explanation:

Since, the given reaction is as follows.

       [tex]2NO(g) \rightleftharpoons N_{2}(g) + O_{2}(g)[/tex]

Initial:    36.1 atm                 0          0

Change:    2x                      x           x

Equilibrium: (36.1 - 2x)       x            x

Now, expression for [tex]K_{p}[/tex] of this reaction is as follows.

            [tex]K_{p} = \frac{[N_{2}][O_{2}]}{[NO]^{2}}[/tex]

As the initial pressure of NO is 36.1 atm. Hence, partial pressure of [tex]O_{2}[/tex] at equilibrium will be calculated as follows.

              [tex]K_{p} = \frac{[N_{2}][O_{2}]}{[NO]^{2}}[/tex]

        [tex]2.40 \times 10^{3} = \frac{x \times x}{(36.1 - 2x)^{2}}[/tex]

                 x = 18.1 atm

Thus, we can conclude that partial pressure of [tex]O_{2}[/tex] at equilibrium is 18.1 atm.

Answer:

partial pressure O2 = 17.867 atm

Explanation:

Step 1: Data given

Temperature = 200 °C

Kp = 2.40 *10^3

Pressure NO = 36.1 atm

Step 2: The balanced equation

2 NO ⇔ N2 + O2

Step 3: The initial pressure

pNO = 36.1 atm

pN2 = 0 atm

pO2 = 0 atm

Step 4: the pressure at the equilibrium

For 2 moles NO we'll have 1 mol N2 and 1 mol O2

pNO = 36.1 - 2X atm

pN2 = X atm

pO2 = X atm

Step 5: Calculate partial pressures

Kp = pN2 * pO2 / (pNO)²

2.40*10³ = x²/(36.1 - 2x)²

48.99 = x/(36.1-2x)

x = 1768.5 -97.98x

x = 17.867

x = partial pressure O2 = 17.867 atm

The natural substrate of beta glycosidase enzyme is Ganglioside GMI, Lactosylceramide, lactose and glycoprotein.

Inhibitors of beta galactosidase enzyme is 1,4-dithiothreitol, beta marcaptoethanol, 4-chloromercurobenzoic acid and Acid-beta galactosidase.

Explanation:

Beta galactosidase enzyme performs the hydrolysis of beta galactosides into monosaccharides. It acts on aryl, amino, alkyl beta glycosidic linkages also.

The enzyme attacks on the bond formed between organic entity and galactose sugar.

It can act on multiple substrates. Some substrates are :

Ganglioside GMI

Lactosylceramide

Lactose : Enzyme beta galactosidase enzyme is a boon for lactose intolerant people because it breaks lactose in yoghurt, sour cream and cheese and makes it easy for consumption to such people.

glycoprotein : These have glycosidic bonds on which enzyme works to break the bonds.

The inhibitors for the β-galactosidase are :

  4-dithiothreitol

beta marcaptoethanol

4-chloromercurobenzoic acid

Acid-beta galactosidase.

When inhibitors are bind to enzyme it breaks down the inhibitor and reaction does not takes place.

β-galactosidase can act on different substrates like lactose, ONPG and IPTG, demonstrating its flexibility. Its activity can be regulated by inhibitors such as glucose and PETG, affecting enzyme function either competitively or non-competitively.

The enzyme β-galactosidase is unique as it can act on various substrates and is influenced by several inhibitors. This enzyme mainly acts on lactose but can also interact with several structurally related substrates such as o-nitrophenyl-β-D-galactoside (ONPG) and isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), exemplifying the flexibility of β-galactosidase.

The activity of β-galactosidase is subject to regulation by various inhibitors. These inhibitors could exert their effect by binding to the enzyme's active site (competitive inhibition), or noncompetitively by interacting with the enzyme's allosteric site--an alternate part where non-substrate molecules can attach. Examples of inhibitors include glucose and phenylethyl β-D-thiogalactoside (PETG).

https://brainly.com/question/32810530

#SPJ11

Answer:

C-term

Explanation:

A correlation between plate height and mobile phase velocity is known as the van Deemter equation.

[tex]H = A + \frac{B}{u}+ C*u[/tex]

Where;

H is the plate height

A  is the eddy diffusion term

B is the longitudinal diffusion term

C is the resistance to mass transfer coefficient

u is the linear velocity

Here C-term describes the mass transfer of sample components between the stationary phase and the mobile phase during separation. One of the major factor affecting C-term is the particle size, changing the diameter equally changes the particle size.

The answer is C-term

E. Both A and Cux are terms of the van Deemter Equation.

The van Deemter equation describes the relationship between the height equivalent to a theoretical plate (HETP) and the linear velocity (u) of the mobile phase in chromatography. The equation is:

[tex]\[H = A + \frac{B}{u} + C \cdot u\][/tex]

When the diameter of the stationary phase particles is decreased and made more uniform in High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), the effects on the terms of the van Deemter equation are as follows:

1. Eddy Diffusion (A term):

  - Eddy diffusion occurs due to the multiple pathways available for the analyte molecules through the packed column. Smaller and more uniform particles reduce the multiple pathways and hence minimize the A term.

2. Longitudinal Diffusion (B/u term):

  - Longitudinal diffusion is the spreading of the analyte band due to diffusion along the length of the column. It is generally more significant at low flow rates and is not directly affected by the particle size.

3. Mass Transfer (C * u term):

  - The mass transfer term relates to the time it takes for the analyte molecules to equilibrate between the stationary and mobile phases. Smaller particles decrease the distance the analytes must travel in and out of the stationary phase, thereby reducing the C.u term.

Therefore, decreasing the diameter of the stationary phase particles and making them more uniform primarily minimizes the A and [tex]\(C \cdot u\)[/tex] terms.

The correct answer is: E. Both A and Cux

Complete Question:

When you decrease the diameter of the stationary phase particles and make them more uniform, in HPLC, which term or terms of the van Deemter Equation is or are minimized?

A. A

B. B/ux

C. Cux

D. Both A and B/ux

E. Both A and Cux

F. Both B/ux and Cux

G. None of the terms

H. All of the terms

Answer:

0.108mol of Hydrogen

Explanation:

The formula for the compound is: CH3COOH

From the formula of the compound,

There are 2moles of oxygen and 4moles of Hydrogen.

If for every 2moles of oxygen, 4moles of Hydrogen is present.

Then, for 0.054 moles of oxygen = (0.054 x 4)/2 = 0.108mol of Hydrogen is present

Answer:

For 0.027 moles CH3COOH we have 0.108 moles H ≈ 1.1 *10^-1 moles H

Explanation:

Step 1: Data given

Acetic acid = CH3COOH

Number of moles oxygen in the sample = 0.054 moles

Step 2: calculate moles CH3COOH

In 1 mol CH3COOH we have 2 moles O

For 0.054 moles Oxygen we have 0.054/2 = 0.027 moles CH3COOH

Step 3: Calculate moles H

In 1 mol CH3COOH we have 4 moles H

For 0.027 moles CH3COOH we have 4*0.027 = 0.108 moles H ≈ 1.1 *10^-1 moles

Answer:

See explanation below

Explanation:

In this case, let's write the equation again:

A <------> B     Keq = ?

As we are using standard conditions, we can assume we have a temperature of 0 °C (273 K) and 1 atm.

To get the equilibrium constant we only do the following:

Keq = [B] / [A]

However, the problem is asking the reverse equilibrium constant (because of the ' in Keq'), so, we have to do the reverse division:

Keq' = [A]/[B]

Replacing the given values of A and B:

Keq' = 1.5/0.5 = 3

We have the equilibrium constant, we can calculate now the gibbs free energy with the following expression:

ΔG°' = -RTlnKeq'

As Keq' is > 1, the negative logaritm will result into a negative result or a number < 0, so, calculating this we have:

ΔG°' = -8.31 * 273 ln3

ΔG°' = -2.492.34 J

Answer:

Before adding any KOH, the pH is 4.03

Explanation:

Step 1: Data given

Volume of a 0.220 M HClO = 50.0 mL = 0.050 L

Molarity of KOH = 0.220 M

The ionization constant for HClO is 4.0*10^–8

Step 2: The balanced equation

HClO + KOH → KClO + H2O

Step 3:  pH before any addition of KOH

When no KOH is added, we only have HClO, a weak acid.

To calculate the pH of a weak acid, we need the Ka

Ka = [H+] / [acid]  

4.0*10^-8 = [H+]² / 0.220  

[H+]² = (4.0*10^-8 ) * 0.220  

[H+]² = 8.8*10^-9  

[H+] = √( 8.8*10^-9)  

[H+] = 9.38*10^-5 M  

pH = -log [H+]  

pH = -log(9.38*10^-5)  

pH = 4.03

Before adding any KOH, the pH is 4.03

Final answer:

To calculate the pH before the addition of KOH in the titration of HClO with KOH, we can use the ionization constant for HClO (Ka). The initial concentration of HClO can be used to calculate the concentration of H+, which in turn can be used to calculate the pH using the pH formula.

Explanation:

The pH before the addition of any KOH can be calculated using the ionization constant for HClO. HClO is a weak acid, so we can use the expression for the acid dissociation constant, Ka, to calculate the pH. The expression for Ka for HClO is:

Ka = [H+][ClO-] / [HClO]

Since we know the initial concentration of HClO, we can assume that the concentration of H+ is equal to the initial concentration of HClO. Therefore, we can rewrite the expression for Ka as:

Ka = [H+]² / [HClO]

Now we can calculate the concentration of H+ using the given initial concentration of HClO:

[H+] = sqrt(Ka * [HClO])

Finally, we can use the concentration of H+ to calculate the pH using the pH formula:

pH = -log[H+]

Answer:

Removing O₂, means removing one of the reactants and the system would counteract this effect by producing more O₂, thereby shifting the equilibrium position to the left and favouring the backward reaction.

Explanation:

The principle that explains how changes in temperature, Concentration and Pressure of reactants or products of a reaction at equilibrium affect the equilibrium position of the reaction is the Le Chatelier's principle.

The Principle explains that a system/process if a system/process which is at equilibrium is disturbed/perturbed/constrained by one or more changes (in concentration, pressure or temperature), the system would shift the equilibrium position to counteract the effects of this change.

Removing O₂, means removing one of the reactants (changing its concentration) and the system would counteract this effect by producing more O₂, thereby shifting the equilibrium position to the left and favouring the backward reaction.

Final answer:

Removing O₂(g) from the equilibrium of the exothermic reaction 2 SO₂(g) + O₂(g) <=> 2 SO₃(g) shifts the equilibrium towards the reactants' side, increasing the concentration of SO₂(g) and decreasing the concentration of SO₃(g).

Explanation:

The question revolves around the effect of removing O₂(g) from the equilibrium system of the reaction 2 SO₂(g) + O₂(g) ⇌ 2 SO₃(g), which is exothermic. According to Le Châtelier's Principle, when a change is made to a system in equilibrium, the system adjusts to counteract that change. In this case, removing O₂(g) (oxygen) would decrease its concentration, prompting the equilibrium to shift towards the reactants' side to increase the concentration of O₂(g) and restore equilibrium. This means that the concentration of SO₂(g) will increase, and the concentration of SO₃(g) will decrease as the reaction shifts left to form more reactants.

Answer:

We need 1.714 moles N2

Explanation:

Step 1: Data given

The reaction yield = 87.5 %

Number of moles NH3 produced = 3.00 moles

Step 2: The balanced equation

N2(g)+ 3H2(g) →2NH3(g)

Step 3: Calculate moles N2

For 2 moles NH3 produced we need 1 mol N2 and 3 moles H2

This means, if the yield was 100%, for 3.00 moles NH3 produced , we need 1.5 moles N2

For a 87.5 % yield:  

we need more N2, increased by a ratio of 100/87.5.

100/87.5 * 1.5 =  1.714 moles N2