A school realizes that they need a new copy machine for their main office. The copy machine costs $5,500. After speaking with the financial advisor, they decide to pay 20% of the cost of the machine in cash and finance the rest through their credit union. How much is their monthly payment if the credit union will charge 2% per year compounded monthly for 2 years

Answer:

The correct answer is Authoritarism.

Explanation:

Authoritarianism, in many areas, is the exercise of an oppressive power, which imposes the will of an individual against that of others. It is a social system that does not accommodate criticism, autonomy or freedom. It is regularly used to define a system of government that meets some of the characteristics already mentioned. In the social and family aspect, it refers to the paternal or masculine figure as that with the protective role, which uses this to infuse macho or paternalistic ideologies.

Answer: authoritarianism

Explanation: authoritarianism is characterized by absolute (tyrannical) obedience to an authority as against individual freedom and related to the expectation of unquestioning obedience. It tends to impose one's demands upon others and is typically maintained by force, and little heed is paid to public opinion or the judicial system. Karen carrying out her boss's request even when it was unethical and possibly illegal shows she is very high in the authoritarianism personality trait.

Answer:

Explanation:

Larry manages a grocery store in a country experiencing a high rate of inflation. He is paid in cash. On payday, he immediately goes out and buys as many goods as he can for himself for the next two weeks in order to prevent the money in his wallet from losing value. What he can't spend, he converts into a more stable foreign currency for a steep fee. This is an example of the of shoe-leather costs inflation as shoe-leather costs refer to the time and effort people take to minimize the effect of inflation on the eroding purchasing power of money. As larry made a decision for stocking goods for use for 2 weeks, it prevents him to fight against inflation as there is so much costs involved to earn such money and then fight against inflation

Answer:

b.​Moral hazard

The insurance company is taking precautions against moral hazard, therefore they want to monitor their driving habit

Explanation:

Moral hazard is the type of hazard that occurs when a party Intentional gets careless or exposes them selves to risk because someone else is liable to bear the risk of whatever comes out of their actions. It occurs when the parties involved does not have complete information about one another.

The balance sheet will reflect the present value of the remaining lease payments, and the income statement will show interest revenue earned by applying the incremental borrowing rate to the book value of the lease receivable.

To determine the pretax amount related to the lease that IC would report in its balance sheet at December 31, 2021, we need to calculate the present value of the remaining lease payments after the first payment has been made. Since the first payment is made at the start of the lease term, we consider it a prepayment, and the subsequent payments are discounted at the incremental borrowing rate, which is 8%. This calculation will give us the net lease receivable that IC reports on its balance sheet.

The pre-tax amount related to the lease that IC would report in its income statement for the year ended December 31, 2021, involves recognizing interest revenue. The interest revenue is calculated by applying the interest rate to the book value of the lease receivable at the beginning of the period. Since a payment was made on June 30, the interest for the first half-year should be calculated on the full lease receivable, while for the second half, it would be calculated after adjusting for the payment made.

Answer: B. Each firm Charges a HP

Explanation:

Nash Equilibrium is a point where there is no incentive from deviating for each firm to deviate or change its strategy.

Firms reach Nash Equilibrium Point when they both charge high price (HP). When both firms charge high price (HP) each firm will earn 10 million dollars at this point there is no incentive for either firm to change and charge lower price because they will earn $ 1 million. Each firm will just choose to charge high price regardless of what the other firm is doing.

The Nash equilibrium of the game is a. Each firm charges a LP.

1. If both firms charge a Low Price (LP):

  - Each firm earns $5 million.

2. If both firms charge a High Price (HP):

  - Each firm earns $10 million.

3. If one firm charges a Low Price (LP) and the other charges a High Price (HP):

  - The firm charging LP earns $15 million.

  - The firm charging HP earns $1 million.

Analysis:

- If you charge LP:

 - If your rival also charges LP, you earn $5 million.

 - If your rival charges HP, you earn $15 million.

- If you charge HP:

 - If your rival charges LP, you earn $1 million.

 - If your rival also charges HP, you earn $10 million.

Best Response Analysis:

- If your rival charges LP:

 - Charging LP earns you $5 million (better than charging HP which earns you $1 million).

- If your rival charges HP:

 - Charging LP earns you $15 million (better than charging HP which earns you $10 million).

From this analysis, charging LP is always a better or equal strategy compared to charging HP, regardless of the rival's choice.

Nash Equilibrium:

In a Nash equilibrium, each player is making the best possible decision given the decision of the other player. Here:

- If both firms charge LP, neither can improve their payoff by changing their strategy unilaterally, because switching to HP would decrease their profit from $5 million to $1 million.

- If both firms charge HP, each earns $10 million, and neither can improve their payoff by unilaterally switching to LP (which would reduce their profit to $1 million).

Given that LP is the dominant strategy for both firms (it provides a higher payoff in all scenarios except when both charge HP), the Nash equilibrium is when both firms charge a Low Price (LP).

Answer:

A. The net income task is $450,000

B. The net cash flow is $650,000

Explanation:

Part A

The net income  can be calculated thus;

Earnings before Income Tax  for Moore corporation = $750,000

Less Income tax (40%)  = 0.4 x  $750,000  = $300,000

Net Income =  $750,000  -  $300,000  = $450,000

Therefore the net income task is $450,000

Part B

The net cash flow  can be calculated thus;

Earnings before Income Tax for Moore corporation $750,000

The Depreciation expense is  = $200,000

Less Income tax  as calculated in part A = $300,000

Net Cash Flow = ($750,000 + $200,000  ) -  ($300,000)  = $650,000

Therefore the net cash flow is $650,000

The Moore Corporation's net income is $450,000, calculated by subtracting the company's taxes from the EBIT. The net cash flow, calculated by adding back the depreciation expense to the net income, is $650,000.

The calculation of a company's net income and net cash flow begins with its operating income, or Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (EBIT), which is $750,000 in this case. From this, you need to subtract the company's taxes. Since the Moore Corporation is 100% equity financed and has a 40% tax rate, the calculation for taxes would be $750,000 * 0.40 = $300,000. Subtracting taxes from the EBIT, we find the net income to be $750,000 - $300,000 = $450,000.

The net cash flow can be found by adding back the depreciation expense to the net income. In this scenario, the depreciation expense is $200,000, so $450,000 (net income) + $200,000 (depreciation expense) = $650,000. Therefore, the company's net cash flow is $650,000.

https://brainly.com/question/32964846

Answer:

The incident has to be reported to NTSB.

Explanation:

According to the rules set out by NTSB:

''An accident is defined as an occurrence associated with the operation of an aircraft that takes place between the time any person boards the aircraft with the intention of flight and all such persons have disembarked, and in which any person suffers death or serious injury, or in which the aircraft receives substantial damage. An incident is an occurrence other than an accident that affects or could affect the safety of operations.''

Even though there were no deaths or serious injury in this case, the helicopter’s tail is damaged to the point where it has to be replaced, it does under the definition of what an Aircraft Incident is as set-out by NTSB definitions and it becomes an incident that has to be reported to the NTSB. The operator is required to file a report and only then can be the tail section can be replaced.

Answer:

The accident must be reported immediately to NTSB by the operators of the helicopter (Sherrif Department), in line with the federal regulations. It is reported as an accident because it is an occurrence associated with operation of an aircraft that takes place between the time any person boards the aircraft with the intention of flight and all such persons have disembarked, and in with any person suffers death or serious injury, or which the aircraft receives substantial damage.

The analysis of the report must be in the form OR must contain information under listed below:

Type, nationality, and registration marks of the aircraft;

Name of owner, and operator of the aircraft;

Name of the pilot-in-command;

Date and time of the accident;

Last point of departure and point of intended landing of the aircraft;

Position of the aircraft with reference to some easily defined geographical point;

Number of persons aboard, number killed, and number seriously injured(in case there is deaths or severe injuries)

Nature of the accident, the weather and the extent of damage to the aircraft, so far as is known;

A description of any explosives, radioactive materials, or other dangerous articles carried(The rural area, where the SWAT team conveyed by the crashed helicopter is containing a methamphetamine lab)

Answer:

Option A -  The bond will not be called is the correct answer.

Explanation:

The rate of return expected from a bond held until its maturity date is referred to as its Yield to maturity (YTM)

However, if YTM is equivalent to the return on the bond, then the assumptions are that bond will not be called, and the will not be defaulted by the user at maturity.

Thus the likelihood of the default is zero.

Therefore, option A - The bond will not be called is the correct answer.

Answer:

False

Explanation:

The provision of the Uniform Commercial Code as amended is that any missing terms such as price, quantity,location and expected time of delivery as well as payment terms  can be added to the contract later on with consent of all parties involved or provided in compliance with other commercial codes.

In other words,the fact that payment should be made within seven working days when payment terms are missing is alien to Uniform Commercial Code.

The answer, therefore is false.

Answer:

correct option is b. $22,000

Explanation:

given data

reported revenues = $810,000

expenses = $630,000

annual amount of amortization  = $15,000

solution

we get here net income 2019 is

net income 2019 = revenue - expenses - amortization  ........1

put here value

net income 2019 = $810,000 - $630,000 - $15,000  

net income 2019 = $165,000

and

as here acquired stock on September

so we get here income for September to December that is

net income = $165,000 × [tex]\frac{4}{12}[/tex]    

net income = $55000

and

non controlling interest is

non controlling interest = 40% of $55000

non controlling interest = $22,000

so correct option is b. $22,000

Final answer:

The noncontrolling interest's share of Kailey Corp.’s income for 2019 is calculated by taking 40% of Kailey's net income after typical expenses and amortization deductions. The net income is determined to be $165,000, of which the noncontrolling interest owns 40%, resulting in a share of $66,000.

Explanation:

To calculate the noncontrolling interest's share of Kailey's income for 2019, we need to calculate Kailey Corp.’s net income for the period after accounting for any amortization related to the acquisition by Denber Co. To start, we calculate the net income before the noncontrolling interest's share.

Since Denber Co. acquired 60% of the common stock, the noncontrolling interest owns the remaining 40% of Kailey Corp. Therefore, we calculate the noncontrolling interest's share of Kailey's income as follows:

Noncontrolling Interest's Share of Net Income = 40% of $165,000 = $66,000

Therefore, the correct answer is $66,000.

Answer:see attached file

Explanation:

Answer:

equation for demand is Q=26,906,880,000,150 - 1,706,666,666.7P

equation for supply is Q=9,609,600,000,150.2 + 2,133,333,333.3P

Pls find all other required parameters in the explanation

Explanation:

Let the demand curve be of the general form Q = a - bP

Let the supply curve be of the general form Q = c + dP

where a, b, c, and d are the constants that you have to find from the information given in the equation

To begin, recall the formula for the price elasticity of demand

E = (P/Q)(ΔQ/ΔP)

Where P is the price per pack = ​ $4,504.50

Q is the quantity of packets= 19,219.2 billion

You are given information about the value of the elasticity E as -0.4

So solve for the slope, which is b in the above formula for the demand curve using the equation E = (P/Q)(ΔQ/ΔP

−0.4 = ($4,504.50/19,219200000000)(ΔQ/ΔP)

ΔQ/ΔP = −0.4(19,219200000000/$4,504.50)

= −1,706,666,666.7= −b.

To find the constant a, substitute for Q, P, and b into the demand curve formula

Q = a - bP

so

19,219200000000 = a - 1,706,666,666.7 × 4,504.50

19,219200000000 = a - 7,687,680,000,150.1

a = 19,219200000000 + 7,687,680,000,150.1

a = 26,906,880,000,150

The equation for demand is therefore

Q=26,906,880,000,150 - 1,706,666,666.7P.

To find the supply curve,

recall the formula for the elasticity of supply and follow the same method as above: E = 0.5

E= (P/Q)(ΔQ/ΔP)

0.5 = ($4,504.50/19,219200000000)(ΔQ/ΔP)

ΔQ/ΔP = 0.5(19,219200000000/$4,504.50)

= 2,133,333,333.3 = d.

To find the constant c, substitute for Q, P, and d into the supply curve formula

Q = c + dP so that

19,219200000000 = c + 2,133,333,333.3 × 4,504.50

19,219200000000 = c + 9,609,599,999,849.8

c = 9,609,600,000,150.2

The equation for supply is therefore Q=9,609,600,000,150.2 + 2,133,333,333.3P.

Final answer:

Tanager Corporation's taxable income in scenario (a) is $105,000 with a tax of $22,050. In scenario (b) with a lower long-term capital gain, the taxable income is $90,000 and the tax is $18,900 assuming a corporate tax rate of 21%.

Explanation:

To compute Tanager Corporation’s taxable income for the year, we first determine their net operating income by subtracting operating expenses ($390,000) from operating income ($480,000), which gives us $90,000. Next, we consider the capital gains and losses. Since capital gains and losses are treated differently, we need to net the long-term gains against the short-term losses. For part (a), the long-term capital gain is $55,000 and the short-term capital loss is $40,000, so the corporation has a net long-term capital gain of $15,000 ($55,000 - $40,000). This brings the corporation's taxable income to $105,000 ($90,000 operating income + $15,000 net capital gain).

Assuming a corporate tax rate of 21% (the current U.S. corporate tax rate as of the knowledge cutoff), the tax would be $22,050 (21% of $105,000). For part (b), with a long-term capital gain of $15,000 and the same short-term capital loss of $40,000, the corporation cannot deduct the excess $25,000 loss against its operating income as there are limitations on capital loss deductions. Thus, for part (b), the taxable income is $90,000 (operating income only), and the tax would be $18,900 (21% of $90,000).

Solution:

                                      TEAL CORPORATION

                                      INCOME STATEMENT

                                      DECEMBER 31, 2014

Net income:

Income from continuing operation before income tax        22,700,000

Income tax (35% * 22,700,000)                                             7,945,000

Income from continuing operations                                      21,905,500

Discontinued operations                              

       Loss before taxes                               $3,255,000          

       Less applicable income tax (35%)      1,128,750              2,096,250                          

Net income                                                                              19,809,250

Preferred dividends declared                                                $1,085,600

Weighted average common shares outstanding                  4,041,000

Earnings per share:

Income from continuing operations

($21,905,500  - $ 1,085,600 )/ 4,041,000                           21,905,499

Discontinued operations, net of tax

($2,096,250/4,041,000)                                                          0.51

Net income

($19,809,250- $1,085,600)/4,041,000                                    19.7

Explanation:

Data given in the question  

Beginning account receivable = $575,000

Account payable balance = $345,000

Since the account receivable is arise from credit sales where the account payable is arisen from credit purchase  

Plus, the income is also increased by considering the account receivable balance while on the other hand, the income can be decreased if account payable is considered  

So the net effect is  

= $575,000 - $345,000

= $230,000

Since the net income comes in positive so the net income is increased

Answer:

Basic Earnings Per Share = $299,640,000/291,858,904 shares = 1.03 per share

Diluted EPS =  $299,640,000/(291,858,904 + 6,000,000)  shares = 1.01 per share

Explanation:

300 million shares of common stock - 24 million Treasury Stock  = 276 million shares outstanding

CALCULATION OF WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES

Date Shares             Weighting (months)           Weighted Average

Jan 1 276,000,000                12/12                               276,000,000

1st July  13,800,000(5% of 276) 6/12                                   6,900,000

13th Sept 30,000,000          109/365 days                  8,958,904.11

Total                                                                          291,858,904

Profit attributable to common shares  = Net Income $300,000,000 – (Preference Dividend of 0.09 x 4,000,000) $360,000 = $299,640,000

The formula for basic earnings per share is:

Profit or loss attributable to common equity holders of the parent business ÷

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period

Basic Earnings Per Share = $299,640,000/291,858,904 shares= 1.03 per share

Diluted EPS will include $500 million of 8% bonds, convertible into 6 million common shares.

Diluted EPS =  $299,640,000/(291,858,904 + 6,000,000)shares  = 1.01 per share

Answer:

B. $9 million

Explanation:

firstly we are given a book value of the plant assets which is $60 million which in calculating the depreciation we use straight line method which is using the assets book value to depreciate over the assets lifespan which is 20 years so to calculate the depreciation for 1 year = $60 million/ 20 years= $3 million which is the depreciation for one year then we multiply this amount for 3 years which will be $3 million X 3years= $9 million which needs to be adjusted and the plant assets must be revalued by in order to have the correct fair value of the plant assets.

The amount by which the plant assets are revalued in the eliminating entry is $9 million.

To find the amount by which the plant assets are revalued in the eliminating entry, we need to calculate the depreciation expense for the first three years of the asset's life. Since the asset has a remaining life of 20 years and is depreciated straight-line, the annual depreciation expense would be $3 million (60 million / 20 years). Therefore, the total depreciation expense for the first three years would be $9 million (3 million x 3 years). This is the amount by which the plant assets are revalued in the eliminating entry, so the correct answer is B. $9 million.

https://brainly.com/question/32374882

#SPJ3

Answer:

The minimum transfer price shoud be $28.50.

Explanation:

The transfer price is determined by two factors:

(1) The idle capacity of the business;

(2) The price in the market.

In this case, the repair division has idle capacity. This means that the transfer price could be equal to, but not lower than, the variable cost of production.

The estimated variable cost is $28.50 per labor-hour. However, this cost must be compared with the market price first, which is $30 per labor-hour. Hence, hiring labor from outside at $30 per labor-hour shall be relatively expensive and not a good option to exercise.

Since, the variable cost is lower, Cruises, Inc. should provide labor at $28.50 per labor-hour. Because there is idle capacity, this is also the minimum transfer price that should be charged.

Since the Repair Division of Cruise, Inc. has idle capacity, the minimum transfer price that it should obtain is $28.50 per labor-hour.

Without the idle capacity, the minimum charge should be $30 per labor-hour.

The minimum transfer price is the variable cost that the Repair Division incurs for both direct labor, direct material, and direct overhead costs.  However, the question did not indiate if direct materials and overhead costs are involved.  For simplicity, we assume that they are not required in the Repairs Division.

Thus, the minimum charge that the Repair Division should obtain is $28.50.

Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/23358803

Answer:

i = 20%

ii= 0%

iii= 15%

Explanation:

First, short selling representsthe selling borrowed securities in order to repurchase them after some time. These securities are not owned, but borrowed instead. The idea is to sell when its price is high and then re-purchase in the future when the price is lower.

a) Determine the return after a year as follows

The number of shares = 250

The price per share =$70

Rate of return is calcuated by the following:

(Number of shares sold short x changes in price) / Margin account amount

We use the three different cases as given in the question

Case 1 - $78

Rate of Return = 250 shares x ($70- $78)/ $10,000

Rate of Return = 250 shares x (-$8)/$10,000

= -$2000/ $10,000 = 0.2 or 20.00%

Case 2 - $70

Rate of Return = 250 shares x ($70- $70)/ $10,000

Rate of Return = 250 shares x ($0)/$10,000

= $0/ $10,000 = 0.00%

Case 3 - $64

Rate of Return = 250 shares x ($70- $64)/ $10,000

Rate of Return = 250 shares x ($6)/$10,000

= $1500/ $10,000 = 0.15 or 15.00%

Answer:

425 rooms

$31,875

Explanation:

In this question, we are asked to calculate the the break even point per room and the break even point in dollars.

We use a mathematical approach to solve this question.

Firstly, we calculate the total fixed cost. Mathematically, the total fixed cost = Salaries + Utilities + Depreciation + Maintenance

In the question, we have identified the following;

Salaries = $5,400 per month

Utilities = $1,100 per month

Depreciation = $1,100 per month

Maintenance = $5,150 per month

Thus, total fixed cost = $5,400 + $1,100 + $1,100 + $5,150 = $12,750

Next, we proceed to calculate the contribution per unit.

Mathematically, contribution per unit = Sales - Variable cost

From the question, we can identify sales as = $75 per room

Variable cost = cost of maid service + other service = $15 + $30 = $45

Thus, contribution per unit = $75-$45 = $30

The break even point is thus calculated as Fixed cost/ contribution per room = $12,750/$30 = 425 rooms

Now, we need to calculate the value of this in dollars. In the question, we can see that rent per room is $75. The break even amount is thus = $75 * 425 = $31,875

Thus, the Breakeven point amount in dollars is $31,875

Answer:

$56,048.70

Explanation:

Let's break the annuity into two streams of payments:  $500 monthly for five years and $1,000 for three years.  Then add the result :

PVA60 = $ 500×[1−1(1+0 . 085/12)600 .085/12] =$ 24 , 370. 59

 PVA36 =  $ 1, 000×[1−1(1+0. 085 /12)360 . 085/12]=$ 31 ,678 . 11

Therefore,

PVA60 + PVA36 = $ 24 , 370. 59 + $ 31 ,678 . 11 =$ 56 , 048 . 70

Final answer:

The bank would be willing to lend the business owner $76,854.90 based on the specified monthly payment amounts and the APR.

Explanation:

The bank would be willing to lend the business owner $76,854.90.

First, calculate the present value of the loan payments using the formula for the present value of an annuity: PV = PMT x [(1 - (1 + r)^-n) / r], where PMT = periodic payment, r = periodic interest rate, and n = total number of payments. For the $1,500 per month payments for three years at 8.5% APR,

PV = $1,500 x [(1 - (1 + 0.085/12)^-36) / (0.085/12)] = $46,276.05.

Next, calculate the present value of the $500 per month payments for two years using the same formula: PV = $500 x [(1 - (1 + 0.085/12)^-24) / (0.085/12)] = $30,578.85.

Finally, add the two present values together to find the total loan amount the bank would be willing to lend: $46,276.05 + $30,578.85 = $76,854.90.

Answer:Do you think Ming is correct in saying Mindy is bullying her?

Yes , she is right, Mindy is definitely bullying her.

What are the indications of bullying?

Bullying doesn't only occur physically but also psychologically and and emotionally,especially in a place of work it can de identified by mistreatment of the other person,verbal abuse , threatening and humiliating the other person.

The bullied person is outcastes , alienated , excluded and ignored like what Mindy is doing, ignoring Ming while he greet everyone else , excluding her by not inviting her in a farewell lunch , eventhough all other colleagues are invited by Mindy.

Spreading false rumours is also part of bullying .

He also critized her publicly by publicly sharing an email about a loss of a client caused by Ming .

These are all signs of abuse.

What advice would you give to Ming?

She will need to keep record or document everything so that when she decides to take the matter further , she may be able to submit proof of what has been happening to her,this will give evidence.

How would you handle this situation with Mindy, without embarrassing Ming?

I think talking to Mindy in an objective way without including Ming's name will be helpful since Mindy has publicly shared his bullying activities. I can actual point out things that are not allowed at work and how certain things can be harmful and degrading to other employees. Make him see how certain behavior affects other employees and how this can be a serious issue that can affect the company and affects even Mindy himself .

Ming is accurate in her assessment of Mindy's bullying.

Demotivating the victim, generating false expectations with no plans to realize it, purposefully neglecting the victim are all signs of bullying. Removing someone from a community or making him feel emotionally or economically isolated is a form of intentional exclusion.

Making the victim believe that they are the source of the problem, Critiquing someone's work or conduct on a regular basis, frequently for unjustified reasons Withholding knowledge from someone or providing them incorrect information, for example.

Ming has experienced some with the above indications of workplace bullying. And it is well within her rights to advise her supervisor of this.

First and foremost, I would assure Ming that she will not have any such problems in the future, and that I will personally address this matter.

I'll speak with Mindy and try to grasp her perspective on such behavior. And I'll make her informed of the regulations that apply in our office, such as the fact that bullying is not tolerated in the workplace. And it will provide her with an opportunity to modify her conduct.

Learn more:

https://brainly.com/question/23352669?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

=  $33,600.

Explanation:

Avoidable costs are example of relevant costs. These are costs that are incurred as a direct consequence of taking a decision. All direct costs associated with a decision to produce are avoidable costs, which means such costs will not be incurred should Tangire Company decides not to produce.

Kindly note that items of general fixed costs which are usually allocated are not avoidable. Simply because they would be incurred either way whether or not production takes place.

The avoidable cost of Tangier sums:

Raw material cost  +   Direct labor cost

= 27,000 + 6,600

=  $33,600.

Answer:

Material quantity variance =$74, 280  unfavorable        

Explanation:

The material quantity variance occurs when the actual quantity of material used to achieve a given level of output is more or less than the standard quantity expected.

For Silmon Corporation, it can be computed as follows:

Quantity variance is                                                          

                                                                                        Gram

5,300 units should have used ( 5300× 5.1 )                 27,030

but did used                                                                    39,410

Variance in quantity                                                      12,380 Unfavorable

Price per unit                                                               × $6

Material quantity variance                                         $ 74,280. Unfavorable

Material quantity variance =$74, 280  unfavorable                                  

Answer:

c. Bruce owns Buster, a large dog who barks whenever anyone walks near his house. Betty lives next to Bruce, and Buster's barking can be heard whenever anyone walks near her house, too. Thus, Betty receives free protection from burglars because of Buster's barking

Explanation:

Free rider is a form of market inefficiency that occurs when people benefit from a good or service but do not pay or underpay for the product.

Betty is receiving free protection from Bruce's dog.

I hope my answer helps you

Answer:

Which of the following is an example of the free-rider problem? Option C is the most suitable answer - Bruce owns Buster, a large dog who barks whenever anyone walks near his house. Betty lives next to Bruce, and Buster's barking can be heard whenever anyone walks near her house, too. Thus, Betty receives free protection from burglars because of Buster's barking.

Explanation:

In a situation whereby one party benefits without having to pay for the transaction themselves, and rather the other party pays for it, there would be an occurrence of the free-riding problem.

In the scenario described in the question, the neighbor is receiving benefits from burglars without having to pay for the security or dog.

Therefore, option C is the most suitable answer.

Answer and explanation:

Outsourcing refers to the practice by which companies take their operations to a different country in an attempt to reduce costs or surpass stiff governmental regulations. Among the different costs firms reduce by outsourcing, labor hand is one of the most important. For this approach to be ethical, the countries where the company will start operations should be characterized by a high unemployment rate. Any form of investment to increase job positions will be healthy for such an economy.

On the other side, outsourcing will take away job positions in the country where the firm has its headquarters. In the case of long-term employees, it would be ethical to take their opportunities away only if they are approaching retirement age. It would be suitable to provide a job position to a head of a family in a different country paying that person less or at least the necessary to cover his or her basket of goods than paying high salaries to elder people with no children to support and who are about to retire.

Outsourcing production to developing nations where labor costs are lower may be ethically defensible if workers are treated well, paid a fair wage (considering local economic conditions), and if employment opportunities are created for them. However, businesses also need to consider the ethical implications of laying off employees in their home country and navigate the potential pitfalls of exploiting weak labor laws in developing nations.

It can be ethically defensible to outsource production to the developing world under certain conditions. The key factor lies in the treatment and compensation of the workers in those countries. If the workers are paid a wage that, while low by Western standards, significantly improves their financial status and provides them with viable employment opportunities, then such outsourcing can be justified. Additionally, if the outsourcing firm adheres to stringent ethical and safety standards, treating their overseas workers with dignity and respect, outsourcing can be seen in a more ethical light.

However, the ethical debate does not end there. The issues of laying off long-term employees in the firm's home country and potentially exploiting developing nations' labor laws or lack thereof add complexity to the situation. It's essential for businesses to find a balance between leveraging global economic opportunities and maintaining ethical labor practices. At the core, the decision comes down to more than just financial considerations; it should also involve an honest evaluation of the societal and human impacts.

High-profile cases such as the Rana Plaza disaster and the controversy over sweatshops linked to major multinational corporations (MNCs) like Nike and Gap underline the importance of adopting ethical labor practices, no matter where operations are located. Restrictions on imports from countries with poor labor conditions and criticisms against companies using sweatshop labor are significant factors that businesses must consider while deciding on outsourcing.

https://brainly.com/question/33657181

#SPJ3

Answer:

Direct labor efficiency variance= $140,000 unfavorable

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Standard requirements:

Direct​ labor:

4 hours per​ unit

$ 14 per hour

Benson produced 5,000 units during the quarter.

Actual cost:

Actual direct labor hours= 30,000

direct labor costs= $240,000

First, we need to calculate the standard total direct labor hours required to produce 5,000 units.

Total direct labor hours= 5,000*4= 20,000 hours

Now, we can calculate the direct labor efficiency variance:

Direct labor efficiency variance= (Standard Quantity - Actual Quantity)*standard rate

Direct labor efficiency variance= (20,000 - 30,000)*14= $140,000 unfavorable

It is unfavorable because the company used more direct labor hours than estimated.

The Office Depot Advantage program is a relationship management program aimed at encouraging customers to consolidate their office product purchases at Office Depot.

The subject of this question is Business.

This question is appropriate for High School level students.

The subject of this question is Business.

This program, called Office Depot Advantage, is an example of a relationship management program. It aims to encourage customers to consolidate their office product purchases at Office Depot by offering rewards based on their spending levels. This program helps Office Depot build and maintain strong relationships with their customers.

The program is designed to incentivize customers to spend more at Office Depot in order to receive greater rewards. This aligns with the goal of profit maximization, as the more customers spend, the more revenue Office Depot generates. Additionally, by consolidating their purchases, customers are likely to experience higher product satisfaction and convenience by having all their office product needs met in one place.

https://brainly.com/question/3407426

#SPJ3

Answer:

Gross profit = $8980

Retained earning (end) = $4480

Explanation:

                                                LUV

                                     Income Statement

                                For the m/o march 1,2018

                                                                                                                 $

Service revenue                                                                               = 10500

less: Operating expense

          Salaries expense     1300

          Utilities expense       220

                                                                                                          = (1520)

                Gross profit                                                                        8980

                                                LUV

                                         Balance sheet

                                       as on march 1,2018    

ASSETS:                         $

Current Asset:

Cash                           = 23500

Account receivable    =  1800

Office supplies            = 1900

                                      27200(a)

Fixed Asset:

Truck                           = 18680(b)

Total Assets   (a+b)     = 45880

LIABILITIES:

Account payable       =  1400 (c)  

STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:  

Issued stocks             = 40000

Add: income              =  8980

less: Paid dividend    = (4500)

                                      44480(d)

Total Stock holders asset and liabilities (c+d) = 45880.

                                              LUV

                             Statement of retained Earning

                                       as on march 1,2018

                                                $

Retained earning (open) =    0

Add: Net income             =  8980

less: Dividend                 =  (4500)

Retained earning (end)      4480

Answer:

Income Earned for platters=$32,800

Option B is Correct ($32,800)

Explanation:

First we will calculate the cost Allocated to both cups and platter:

Allocation rate= [tex]\frac{Total\ Cost\ incurred }{Total\ Units}[/tex]

Allocation rate=[tex]\frac{\$40,000+\$44,000}{4000+1000} \\[/tex]

Allocation rate=$16.8

Amount Allocated for Platters= Units of platter* Allocation rate

Amount Allocated for Platters= 4000*$16.8

Amount Allocated for Platters= $67,200.

Calculating Income for platters:

Sales of platters=$100,000

Remixing Cost for platters= $0

Income Earned for platters=Sales of platters-Amount Allocated for Platters-Remixing Cost for platters

Income Earned for platters=$100,000-$67,200-$0

Income Earned for platters=$32,800

Option B is Correct ($32,800)

Final answer:

After allocating the joint costs based on the number of units produced, we find that the income earned for platters is $31,200. This is not an exact match to the provided options, suggesting a possible typo in the question, but $32,800 is the closest among the given choices.

Explanation:

The student has presented a cost allocation problem involving the production of platters and cups with silver alloy. To calculate the income earned for platters, we must allocate the joint costs on the basis of the number of units produced.

The correct answer is $31,200, which is not one of the options provided, indicating there may be a typo in the options. However, the closest answer from the given options is b. $32,800.