Answer:
[tex]49.6\times 10^5\ kg[/tex]
[tex]48.6\times 10^6\ N[/tex]
[tex]80.1\times 10^5\ N[/tex]
[tex]49.6\times 10^5\ kg[/tex]
Explanation:
[tex]1\ slug=14.5939\ kg[/tex]
[tex]340\times 10^3\ slug=340\times 10^3\times 14.5939=4961926\ kg[/tex]
The mass in SI unit is [tex]49.6\times 10^5\ kg[/tex]
Weight would be
[tex]W=mg\\\Rightarrow W=4961926\times 9.81\\\Rightarrow W=48676494.06\ N[/tex]
The weight in SI unit is [tex]48.6\times 10^6\ N[/tex]
[tex]1\ ft/s^2=0.3048\ m/s^2[/tex]
[tex]5.30\ ft/s^2=5.30\times 0.3048=1.61544\ m/s^2[/tex]
[tex]W=mg\\\Rightarrow W=4961926\times 1.61544\\\Rightarrow W=8015693.73744\ N[/tex]
The weight on the moon is [tex]80.1\times 10^5\ N[/tex]
The mass of an object is same anywhere in the universe.
So, the mass of the rocket on Moon is [tex]49.6\times 10^5\ kg[/tex]
A car, on a straight road, is stopped at a traffic light. When the light turns to green the car accelerates with a constant acceleration. It reaches a speed of 19.1 m/s (68.8 km/h) in a distance of 101 m. Calculate the acceleration of the car.
The car accelerates from 0 m/s to 19.1 m/s in 101 m, with an acceleration of approximately 1.81 m/s².
Given that,
The car is stopped at a traffic light on a straight road.
When the light turns green, the car accelerates.
The car reaches a speed of 19.1 m/s (68.8 km/h).
The distance covered during acceleration is 101 m
To calculate the acceleration of the car,
Use the kinematic equation:
v² = u² + 2as
Where,
v is the final velocity (19.1 m/s in this case),
u is the initial velocity (0 m/s since the car is stopped),
a is the acceleration that we're trying to find,
s is the distance covered (101 m).
Plugging in the known values, we have:
19.1² = 0² + 2a(101)
Simplifying further:
365.81 = 202a
Now, let's solve for a:
a = 365.81 / 202
Calculating that, we find:
a ≈ 1.81 m/s²
Hence,
The acceleration of the car is approximately 1.81 m/s².
To learn more about acceleration visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2303856
#SPJ12
The acceleration of the car is 1.85 m/s^2.
Explanation:To calculate the acceleration of the car, we can use the equation:
v^2 = u^2 + 2as
Where:
v is the final velocityu is the initial velocity (0 m/s in this case)a is the accelerations is the displacementPlugging in the given values, we have:
19.1^2 = 0 + 2a(101)
Simplifying the equation gives us:
a = (19.1^2) / (2 * 101) = 1.85 m/s^2
Therefore, the acceleration of the car is 1.85 m/s^2.
If the clock runs slow and loses 15 s per day, how should you adjust the length of the pendulum?
Answer:
L= 1 m, ΔL = 0.0074 m
Explanation:
A clock is a simple pendulum with angular velocity
w = √ g / L
Angular velocity is related to frequency and period.
w = 2π f = 2π / T
We replace
2π / T = √ g / L
T = 2π √L / g
We will use the value of g = 9.8 m / s², the initial length of the pendulum, in general it is 1 m (L = 1m)
With this length the average time period is
T = 2π √1 / 9.8
T = 2.0 s
They indicate that the error accumulated in a day is 15 s, let's use a rule of proportions to find the error is a swing
t = 1 day (24h / 1day) (3600s / 1h) = 86400 s
e= Δt = 15 (2/86400) = 3.5 104 s
The time the clock measures is
T ’= To - e
T’= 2.0 -0.00035
T’= 1.99965 s
Let's look for the length of the pendulum to challenge time (t ’)
L’= T’² g / 4π²
L’= 1.99965 2 9.8 / 4π²
L ’= 0.9926 m
Therefore the amount that should adjust the length is
ΔL = L - L’
ΔL = 1.00 - 0.9926
ΔL = 0.0074 m
A closed system consists of 0.3 kmol of octane occupying a volume of 5 m3 . Determine
a) the weight of the system, in N, and
(b) the molar- and mass-based specific volumes, in m3 /kmol and m3 /kg respectively. Let g = 9.81 m/s2
Answer:
(a). The weight of the system is 336.32 N.
(b). The molar volume is 16.6 m³/k mol.
The mass based volume is 0.145 m³/kg.
Explanation:
Given that,
Weight of octane = 0.3 kmol
Volume = 5 m³
(a). Molecular mass of octane
[tex]M=114.28\ g/mol[/tex]
We need to calculate the mass of octane
Mass of 0.3 k mol of octane is
[tex]M=114.28\times0.3\times1000[/tex]
[tex]M=34.284\ kg[/tex]
We need to calculate the weight of the system
Using formula of weight
[tex]W=mg[/tex]
Put the value into the formula
[tex]W=34.284\times9.81[/tex]
[tex]W=336.32\ N[/tex]
(b). We need to calculate the molar volume
Using formula of molar volume
[tex]\text{molar volume}=\dfrac{volume}{volume of moles}[/tex]
Put the value into the formula
[tex]\text{molar volume}=\dfrac{5}{0.3}[/tex]
[tex]\text{molar volume}=16.6\ m^3/k mol[/tex]
We need to calculate the mass based volume
Using formula of mass based volume
[tex]\text{mass based volume}=\dfrac{volume}{mass}[/tex]
Put the value into the formula
[tex]\text{mass based volume}=\dfrac{5}{34.284}[/tex]
[tex]\text{mass based volume}=0.145\ m^3/kg[/tex]
Hence, (a). The weight of the system is 336.32 N.
(b). The molar volume is 16.6 m³/k mol.
The mass based volume is 0.145 m³/kg.
Determine a valid way of finding the wire’s diameter if you know the resistivity of the material, \rho , and can measure the current flowing through the wire, I, and the voltage drop between two points of the wire, V, a known distance apart, L. find the diameter of the wire in terms of \rho L V and I.
How will you find the measurement error (i.e., uncertainty) in the diameter of the wire?
Answer:
To find the diameter of the wire, when the following are given:
Resistivity of the material (Rho), Current flowing in the conductor, I, Potential difference across the conductor ends, V, and length of the wire/conductor, L.
Using the ohm's law,
Resistance R = (rho*L)/A
R = V/I.
Crossectional area of the wire A = π*square of radius
Radius = sqrt(A/π)
Diameter = Radius/2 = [sqrt(A/π)]
Making A the subject of the formular
A = (rho* L* I)V.
From the result of A, Diameter can be determined using
Diameter = [sqrt(A/π)]/2. π is a constant with the value 22/7
Explanation:
Error and uncertainty can be measured varying the value of the parameters used and calculating different values of the diameters. Compare the values using standard deviation
The diameter of the wire can be derived from the resistivity, length, current, and voltage using Ohm's Law and the equation for the resistance of a wire. To find the uncertainty in the diameter, use error propagation techniques considering the uncertainties of the resistivity, length, and (voltage/current).
Explanation:The diameter of the wire can be found using Ohm's Law and the formula for the resistance of a wire. The guiding formula is R = V/I (Ohm’s Law), where R is the resistance, V is the voltage, and I is the current.
The formula for resistance of a wire is R = ρL/A, where A (cross-sectional area) is π(d/2)^2 because the wire is cylindrical. Equating these two equations gives V/I = ρL/π(d/2)^2. Solving this for d (diameter) gives d = sqrt((4ρL(V/I))/π). To calculate the measurement error or uncertainty in the diameter of the wire, one would need to use error propagation techniques.
If the uncertainties in ρ, L, V/I are δρ, δL and δ(V/I) respectively, then the uncertainty in d, δd is given by δd = 1/2 [((4δρρ)/(ρL(V/I)))^2+ ((4δL/L)/(ρL(V/I)))^2+ ((4δ(V/I)/(V/I))/(ρL(V/I)))^2]^1/2.
https://brainly.com/question/36594130
#SPJ3
A negative charge of -0.510 μC exerts an upward 0.600-N force on an unknown charge that is located 0.300 m directly below the first charge. What are (a) the value of the unknown charge (magnitude and sign); (b) the magnitude and direction of the force that the unknown charge exerts on the −0.550μC charge?
By employing Coulomb's Law and additional physical principles like Newton's third law, it becomes possible to determine the characteristics of an unknown electrical charge from the force it experiences and exerts.
Explanation:The question concerns two charges, one of which is negative and known (-0.510 µC), and the other is unknown. You're asked to find the value of this unknown charge and the force it exerts on the known charge. To do this, we would use Coulomb's Law, which states that the electric force between two charges is directly proportional to the product of their charges, and inversely proportional to the square of the distance separating them.
So, using the formula F = k*q1*q2/r^2, where F is the force, k is Coulomb's constant (approximately 9 * 10^9 N.m^2/C^2), q1 and q2 are the charges, and r is the distance between them, we can solve for the unknown charge(q2) - which gives us q2 = Fr^2/(kq1). Substituting the provided values in the question, we should be able to solve it.
For part (b), the sign of the force that the unknown charge exerts on the known charge would be exactly opposite in direction to the force it experiences, as per Newton's third law (equal and opposite reactions). However, we'd need to know the magnitude of the unknown charge to calculate the actual force.
Learn more about Electric Charges and Forces here:https://brainly.com/question/16909192
#SPJ3
Photons of what minimum frequency are required to remove electrons from gold? The work function for gold is 4.8 eV. 1 eV = 1.6 x 10 -19 J. h = 6.626 x 10 -34 J s.a. 7.3 x10^14 Hz b. 6.5x10^15 Hz c. 1.2 x 10^15 Hz d. 4.6 x 10^14 Hz e. 3.8 x10^17 Hz
Answer:
c. 1.2×10¹⁵ Hz
Explanation:
Work Function: This is the minimum amount of energy a photon requires to liberate an electron from the surface of a metal.
Mathematically, it can be represented as
E' = hf' ................................... Equation 1
Where E' = work function of gold, f' = minimum frequency ( threshold frequency), h = Planck's constant
Making f' the subject of the equation,
f' = E'/h................................. Equation 2
Given: E' = 4.8 ev = 4.8×1.6×10⁻¹⁹ J = 7.68×1.6×10⁻¹⁹ J, h = 6.626×10⁻³⁴Js.
Substituting into equation 2
f' = 7.68×10⁻¹⁹/ 6.626×10⁻³⁴
f' = 1.16×10¹⁵ Hz.
f' ≈ 1.2×10¹⁵ Hz
Thus the minimum frequency = 1.2×10¹⁵ Hz
The right option is c. 1.2×10¹⁵ Hz
Using Planck's equation, the minimum frequency of photons required to remove an electron from gold, given a work function of 4.8 eV, is approximately 1.15 * 10^15 Hz or 1.15 PHz.
Explanation:
The question is asking for the minimum frequency of photons capable of removing electrons from gold. This is related to the photoelectric effect, where electrons can be ejected from a metal surface by incident light. In this process, energy of the incoming light is absorbed by the electron, which can then be ejected if the light's energy is greater than the binding energy of the electron, which is also known as the work function.
The work function for gold is given as 4.8 eV. To calculate the minimum frequency, we need to employ Planck's equation, E = hf, which implies frequency, f = E/h. Given that E is the energy of the photon which must be equal to the work function (4.8 eV or 4.8 * 1.6 x 10^-19 J) and h is Planck’s constant (6.626 x 10^-34 J s), we can solve for f. The calculation gives approximately 1.15 * 10^15 Hz or 1.15 PHz, which is not listed among the provided answer choices.
Learn more about Photoelectric Effect here:https://brainly.com/question/12732631
#SPJ3
At a certain location, Earth has a magnetic field of 0.60 â 10â4 T, pointing 75° below the horizontal in a north-south plane. A 14.6 m long straight wire carries a 11 A current
a) If the current is directed horizontally toward the east, what are the magnitude and direction of the magnetic force on the wire?
b) What are the magnitude and direction of the force if the current is directed vertically upward?
Answer:
a) [tex] = 9.30\times 10^{-3} N[/tex]
b) [tex]= 2.49\times 10^{-3} N[/tex]
Explanation:
Given data;
magnetic field [tex]= 0.60 \times 10^{-4} T[/tex]
current I = 11 A
length of wire L = 14.6 m
Angle[tex] \theta = 75 A[/tex]
a) Magnetic force due to current
[tex]F = BIL sin \theta[/tex]
[tex] = 0.60 \times 10^{-4} \times 11 \times 14.6 sin 75^o[/tex]
[tex] = 9.30\times 10^{-3} N[/tex]
B) magnitude of force due upward current direction
[tex]F = BIL sin \theta[/tex]
[tex]= 0.60 \times 10^{-4} \times 11 \times 14.6 sin (75^o + 90^o)[/tex]
[tex]= 2.49\times 10^{-3} N[/tex]
The magnetic force on a wire depends on the direction of the current relative to the Earth's magnetic field. In scenario (a), the force is calculated using an angle of 165° between the wire and magnetic field. For (b), the angle is 75°, and the force's magnitude is computed with the sin of that angle.
Explanation:Magnetic Force on a Current-Carrying Wire
The magnetic force on a current-carrying wire is given by F = I x L x B x sin(θ), where I is the current, L is the length of the wire, B is the magnetic field strength, and θ is the angle between the wire and the direction of the magnetic field.
a) When the current is directed horizontally toward the east and the Earth's magnetic field is pointing 75° below the horizontal in a north-south plane, we can calculate the force using the cross product of the current direction and magnetic field. The angle between the wire and the magnetic field is 90° + 75° = 165°. Therefore, the magnitude of the force is F = 11 A * 14.6 m * 0.60 * 10^-4 T * sin(165°) and its direction is perpendicular to both the current and the magnetic field, following the right-hand rule.
b) If the current is directed vertically upward, the force is perpendicular to the wire and the magnetic field. The angle between the current direction and the magnetic field is now 75°, so the magnitude of the force is F = 11 A * 14.6 m * 0.60 * 10^-4 T * sin(75°), and its direction is again determined by the right-hand rule.
A small object A, electrically charged, creates an electric field. At a point P located 0.250 m directly north of A, the field has a value of 40.0 N/C directed to the south.
What is the charge of object A?
the magnitude of the charge of object A is[tex]\( 2.78 \times 10^{-10} \, \text{C} \).[/tex]
We can use the formula for electric field intensity ( E ) to calculate the charge of object A. The electric field intensity is given by:
[tex]\[ E = \frac{k \cdot |q|}{r^2} \][/tex]
Where:
- ( E ) is the electric field intensity (40.0 N/C),
- ( k) is Coulomb's constant [tex](\( 8.99 \times 10^9 \, \text{N m}^2/\text{C}^2 \)),[/tex]
- [tex]\( |q| \)[/tex] is the magnitude of the charge on object A (what we're trying to find), and
- ( r ) is the distance from object A to point P (0.250 m).
First, rearrange the formula to solve for[tex]\( |q| \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ |q| = \frac{E \cdot r^2}{k} \][/tex]
Now, substitute the given values into the formula:
[tex]\[ |q| = \frac{40.0 \, \text{N/C} \cdot (0.250 \, \text{m})^2}{8.99 \times 10^9 \, \text{N m}^2/\text{C}^2} \]\[ |q| = \frac{40.0 \times 0.0625}{8.99 \times 10^9} \, \text{C} \]\[ |q| = \frac{2.5}{8.99 \times 10^9} \, \text{C} \]\[ |q| = 2.78 \times 10^{-10} \, \text{C} \][/tex]
So, the magnitude of the charge of object A is[tex]\( 2.78 \times 10^{-10} \, \text{C} \).[/tex]
When you touch a friend after walking across a rug on a dry day, you typically draw a spark of about 1.89 mm. Calculate the potential difference between you and your friend just before the spark.
To solve this problem we will apply the concepts related to the magnitude of the electric field. Defined as the proportion of the electric potential per unit of distance, that is,
[tex]E = \frac{V}{d}[/tex]
Where E is the magnitude of the electric field between the plates, V is the potential difference between the plates, and d is the separation of the plates
The breakdown field of air is [tex]3.0*10^6[/tex] N/C.
Replacing we have that the Potential is
[tex]V = Ed[/tex]
[tex]V = (3.0*10^6)(1.89*10^{-3})[/tex]
[tex]V = 5670V[/tex]
Therefore the potential difference between you and your friend just before the spark is 5670V
A 46.0-kg girl is standing on a 157-kg plank. Both originally at rest on a frozen lake that constitutes a frictionless, flat surface. The girl begins to walk along the plank at a constant velocity of 1.48î m/s relative to the plank.
(a) What is her velocity relative to the surface of ice?
(b) What is the velocity of the plank relative to the surface of ice?
To solve this problem we will apply the linear motion kinematic equations. Just as we will also find the relative speed of the body through the conservation of momentum. Our data is given as
[tex]M = 157kg[/tex]
[tex]m = 46kg[/tex]
[tex]v_1 = 1.48m/s[/tex]
PART A)
From the conservation of momentum,
[tex]\text{Momentum of Plank+girl}+\text{Mometum of girl} = 0[/tex]
[tex](M+m)v_2+mv_1 = 0[/tex]
[tex](M+m)v_2 = -m_v1[/tex]
[tex]v_2 = \frac{-Mv_1}{M+m}[/tex]
[tex]v_2 = \frac{-(46)(1.48)}{(157+46)}[/tex]
[tex]v_2 = -0.3353m/s[/tex]
Since the ice surface is frozen lake and girl is moving on it so the relative velocity will get added. Therefore the velocity of the girl relative to the ice surface is as,
[tex]v_1+v_2 = 1.48+(-0.33353)[/tex]
[tex]v_1+v_2 = 1.14647m/s[/tex]
The velocity of the girl relative to the ice surface is 1.14647m/s
PART B) The velocity of the plank plus girl is [tex]v_2 = -0.3353m/s[/tex]
Since the ice surface is frozen lake and plank is moving with girl on it so the relative velocity will get added. Therefore the velocity of the plank relative to the ice surface is as:
[tex]v_2 = -0.3353m/s[/tex]
"The correct answers are: (a) The girl's velocity relative to the surface of ice is 1.48m/s. (b) The velocity of the plank relative to the surface of ice is 0 m/s.
(a) Since the girl is walking on the plank with a constant velocity of 1.48 m/s relative to the plank, and the plank itself is at rest on the frictionless ice surface, there are no external forces acting on the girl-plank system in the horizontal direction.
According to the principle of inertia, an object at rest will stay at rest, and an object in motion will stay in motion with a constant velocity unless acted upon by an external force. Therefore, the girl's velocity relative to the surface of ice is the same as her velocity relative to the plank, which is 1.48 m/s.
(b) The plank is initially at rest on the frictionless ice surface, and since there are no external forces acting on it in the horizontal direction, it will remain at rest relative to the ice surface. This means that the velocity of the plank relative to the surface of ice is 0 m/s. The girl walking on the plank does not affect the plank's velocity because her motion is internal to the girl-plank system, and there is no friction to transfer her momentum to the plank.
In summary, the girl's motion is relative to the plank, and since the plank remains stationary on the ice, her velocity relative to the ice is the same as her walking velocity on the plank. The plank itself does not move because of the lack of friction and external forces, thus its velocity relative to the ice remains 0 m/s."
Rank these electromagnetic waves on the basisof their speed (in vacuum). Rank from fastest to slowest. To rank items as equivalent, overlap them.a. Yellow lightb. FM radio wavec. Green lightd. X-raye. AM radio wavef. Infrared wave
Answer: On the basis of speed they are all equivalent.
Yellow light = Fm radio wave = Green light = X-ray = AM radio wave = Infrared wave
Explanation:
Yellow light, Fm radio wave, Green light ,X-ray, AM radio wave and Infrared wave are all electromagnetic waves, and all electromagnetic waves move at the same vacuum speed which is the speed of light and is approximately 3.0x10^8 m/s.
They only differ in wavelength and frequency
c = λf
c (speed of light) = λ (wavelength) x f (frequency)
Therefore; on the basis of speed they are all equivalent.
Yellow light = Fm radio wave = Green light = X-ray = AM radio wave = Infrared wave
All electromagnetic waves, including yellow light, FM radio waves, green light, X-rays, AM radio waves, and infrared waves travel at the same speed in a vacuum, known as the speed of light, which is 3.00 × 10^8 m/s. Therefore, they are equivalent in speed.
Explanation:The student has asked to rank various types of electromagnetic waves based on their speed in a vacuum. In a vacuum, all electromagnetic waves travel at the same speed, which is the speed of light, and is one of the fundamental constants of nature. The speed of light (c) in a vacuum is 3.00 × 108 meters per second (m/s).
Therefore, the ranking of the electromagnetic waves from fastest to slowest for yellow light, FM radio wave, green light, X-ray, AM radio wave, and infrared wave would be:
Yellow lightGreen lightX-rayInfrared waveFM radio waveAM radio waveSince all of these waves travel at the same speed in a vacuum, they can be considered equivalent in terms of speed. However, they differ in wavelength and frequency.
Learn more about Speed of Electromagnetic Waves here:https://brainly.com/question/2012069
#SPJ3
Hold a small piece of paper (e.g., an index card) flat in front of you. The paper can be thought of as a part of a larger plane surface.
A. What single line could you use to specify the orientation of the plane of the paper (i.e., so that someone else could hold the paper in the same, or in a parallel, plane)?
B. The area of a flat surface can be represented by a single vector, called the area vector A. What does the direction of the vector represent? What would you expect the magnitude of the vector to represent?
C. Place a large piece of graph paper flat on the table. Describe the direction and magnitude of the area vector, A, for the entire sheet of paper. Describe the direction and magnitude of the area vector, dA, for each of the individual squares that make up the sheet.
D. Fold the graph paper twice so that it forms a hollow triangular tube. Can the entire sheet be represented by a single vector with the characteristics you defined above? If not, what is the minimum number of area vectors required?
E. Form the graph paper into a tube as shown. Can the orientation of each of the individual squares that make up the sheet of graph paper still be represented by dA vectors as inabove? Explain.
F. What must be true about a surface or a portion of a surface in order to be able to associate a single area vector A with that surface?
Answer:
Explanation:
(a). The line used to specify the orientation of the plane of paper is the line normal to the plane of sheet of paper
(b). The direction of the vector represents the normal to the lat surface while the Magnitude represents the area of flat surface.
(c). Say the area of each smaller square is 1 square unit, then the area of graph paper is 64 square units. Direction of this area vector is given by a unit vector perpendicular to the graph sheet. If X and Y axes are in the plane of paper, then unit vector normal to the sheet of paper is K. Hence the complete vector is 64 K sq. units.
Area vector of each individual square is 1 squ. unit. where all these individual squares are parallel as vectors.
(d). Absolutely.
the entire sheet can be represented by a single vector. Its area vector is the sum of area vectors of three flat sides of triangular tube.
(e) NO.
Orientation of the individual squares is not the same for all squares. They cannot be represented by the same vector when compared to part C above, because they are in different directions even tough their magnitude are same.
(f) To represent a surface with a single area vector, divide the surface in to as many as possible flat pieces (if necessary infinitely large number of infinitesimally small pieces). Find the area vectors of all pieces. Add all the area vectors to obtain the single area vector resenting the complete surface.
But since the process can be done for any surface, any surface can be represented by a single area vector.
i hope this helps, cheers
The normal vector is perpendicular to the flat surface while the area vector is the direction in which the plane is embedded in 3 dimensions.
Normal Vector:A vector that is perpendicular to the plane of the surface. So a normal vector will be used to specify the plane of the paper.The magnitude of the flat surface represents the area while the vector represents the normal. Area vector:An area vector is an area (magnitude) with direction.
Therefore, the normal vector is perpendicular to the flat surface while the area vector is the direction in which the plane is embedded in 3 dimensions.
Learn more about Normal Vector and area vector:
https://brainly.com/question/16000644
An ideal spring has spring constant ks (to distinguish it from the electrostatic constant k) and equilibrium length l. Then, you glue two identical negative point charges to the ends of the spring and observe that the equilibrium length doubles. Determine the amount of charge on each end of the spring
Answer:
q = square root (4KsL³/k)
The force of extension of the spring is equal to the force of repulsion between the two like charges. Two like charges(positive or negative) would always repel each other and two unlike charges would always attract each other. This electric force between the charges is what is responsible for the stretching of the spring. The electric force causes the spring to increase in length from L to 2L. Equating these forces, that is the electric force between the charges and the elastic force of the spring and rearranging the variables gives the expression to obtain q.
Explanation:
See the attachment below for full solution.
By equating the spring force with the electrostatic repulsion force at the new equilibrium length, we find that the charge on each end of the spring is [tex]q = 2\sqrt(ks ke l^3)[/tex]. This derivation uses Hooke's Law and Coulomb's Law for calculation.
To solve this problem, we need to understand the balance between the spring force and the electrostatic repulsion force. We start by looking at Hooke's Law for the spring force:
[tex]F_spr = -k_s (x - l)[/tex]
Where k_s is the spring constant, x is the stretched length (which is 2l in this case, since the equilibrium length doubles), and l is the original equilibrium length. The spring force is given by:
[tex]F_spr = -k_s (2l - l) \\= -k_s l[/tex]
The electrostatic repulsion force between two identical charges q separated by a distance 2l is given by Coulomb's Law:
[tex]F_e = \frac{k_e q^2}{(2l)^2} \\= \frac{k_e q^2}{4l^2}[/tex]
At equilibrium, the magnitudes of these two forces are equal:
[tex]k_s l = \frac{k_e q^2}{4l^2}[/tex]
Rearranging to solve for q:
[tex]q^2 = 4k_s k_e l^3[/tex]
[tex]q = \sqrt{4k_s k_e l^3} \\= 2\sqrt{k_s k_e l^3}[/tex]
So, each end of the spring must have a charge of[tex]q = 2\sqrt{k_s k_e l^3}.[/tex]
A cable passes over a pulley. Because the cable grips the pulley and the pulley has non- zero mass, the tension in the cable is not the same on opposite sides of the pulley. The force on one side is 167 N, and the force on the other side is 42 N. Assuming that the pulley is a uniform disk of mass 1.06 kg and radius 0.433 m, find the magnitude of its angular acceleration. For a uniformi disk, I = (1/2) m,2.1 Answer in units of rad/s
Answer:
544.68604 rad/s²
Explanation:
m = Mass of disk = 1.06 kg
R = Radius of disk = 0.433 m
T = Tension
[tex]T_2[/tex] = 167 N
[tex]T_1[/tex] = 42 N
Moment of inertia is given by
[tex]I=\dfrac{1}{2}mR^2\\\Rightarrow I=\dfrac{1}{2}\times 1.06\times 0.433^2[/tex]
The resultant torque of the system will be given by
[tex](T_2-T_1)R=\tau\\\Rightarrow (T_2-T_1)R=I\alpha\\\Rightarrow \alpha=\dfrac{(T_2-T_1)R}{I}\\\Rightarrow \alpha=\dfrac{(167-42)\times 0.433}{\dfrac{1}{2}\times 1.06\times 0.433^2}\\\Rightarrow \alpha=544.68604\ rad/s^2[/tex]
The angular acceleration of the disk is 544.68604 rad/s²
The change in the velocity with respect to time is called acceleration.
The acceleration depends on the following:-
VelocityTimeAccording to the question, the data is as follows:-
m = 1.06 kg
R = 0.433 m
T = Tension, T1 = 167 N , T2= 42 N
To calculate we will use the formula of the moment of inertia i.e
[tex]I =\frac{1}{2}mr^2[/tex]
After putting the value,
[tex]I = \frac{1}{2} *1.06*0.433^2[/tex]
The resultant torque of the system will be given by
[tex]torque = (T_2-T_1)R[/tex]
[tex]Ia = (T_2-T_1)R[/tex]
[tex]a =\frac{(T_2-T_1)R}{I}[/tex]
[tex]a= \frac{(167-42)*0.433}{\frac{1}{2}*1.06*0.433^2}[/tex]
After solving the equation, a is = 544.68604
Hence, The angular acceleration of the disk is 544.68604 rad/s²
For more information, refer to the link:-
https://brainly.com/question/19247046
A uniform charge density of 500nC/m^3 is distributed throughout a spherical volume (radius 16cm). Consider a cubical (4cm along each edge) surface completely inside the sphere. Determine the electric flux through the surface of the cube.
Answer:
[tex]3.61581\ Nm^2/C[/tex]
Explanation:
[tex]\epsilon_0[/tex] = Permittivity of free space = [tex]8.85\times 10^{-12}\ F/m[/tex]
V = Volume of cube = [tex]0.04^3[/tex]
[tex]\rho[/tex] = Charge density = [tex]500\ nC/m^3[/tex]
Electric flux is given by
[tex]\phi=\dfrac{Q}{\epsilon_0}\\\Rightarrow \phi=\dfrac{\rho V}{\epsilon_0}\\\Rightarrow \phi=\dfrac{500\times 10^{-9}\times 0.04^3}{8.85\times 10^{-12}}\\\Rightarrow \phi=3.61581\ Nm^2/C[/tex]
The electric flux through the surface of the cube is [tex]3.61581\ Nm^2/C[/tex]
The electric flux through the surface of a cubical object inside a sphere can be found by using Gauss's Law. It is equal to the total charge enclosed by the cube, calculated by multiplying the charge density by the volume of the cube and then divided by the permittivity of free space. In this case, the electric flux is about 36.109 N.m^2/C.
Explanation:The subject of this question is physics, specifically dealing with the concept of electric charges and electric fields. To find the electric flux through the cubical surface placed inside the sphere, we can use Gauss's Law.
According to Gauss's Law, the electric flux through a closed surface is equal to the total charge enclosed by the surface divided by permittivity constant (εo).
In this case, we first need to find the charge enclosed by the cube, which we can find by multiplying the charge density with the volume of the cube. Since the charge density is 500nC/m^3 and the volume is 4cm x 4cm x 4cm (converted to m^3), the enclosed charge is 32nC. Then, divide this by the permittivity of free space, resulting in about 36.109 N.m^2/C, which represents the electric flux through the surface of the cube.
Learn more about Electric Flux here:https://brainly.com/question/32826728
#SPJ3
With what tension must a rope with length 2.30 mm and mass 0.105 kgkg be stretched for transverse waves of frequency 36.0 HzHz to have a wavelength of 0.790 mm?
Answer:
Tension must a rope be stretched is 36.8828 N
Explanation:
Wave speed in term of wavelength:
[tex]v=f. \lambda[/tex]
Where:
f is the frequency
[tex]\lambda[/tex] is the wavelength
Now:
[tex]v=36*0.790\\v=28.44 m/s[/tex]
Wave speed in term of tension force and mass per unit length
[tex]v=\sqrt{\frac{F}{Mass\ per\ unit\ length}}[/tex] Eq (1)
Where:
F is the tension force
[tex]Mass\ per\ unit\ length=\frac{0.105}{2.30} \\Mass\ per\ unit\ length=0.0456 Kg/m\\[/tex]
Since [tex]v[/tex] is calculated above.On rearranging Eq (1) we will get:
[tex]F=v^2 *Mass\ per\ unit\ length\\F=(28.44)^2*0.0456\\F=36.8828 N[/tex]
Tension must a rope be stretched is 36.8828 N
In March 2006, two small satellites were discovered orbiting Pluto, one at a distance of 48,000 km and the other at 64,000 km. Pluto already was known to have a large satellite, Charon, orbiting at 19,600 km with an orbital period of 6.39 days.Part AAssuming that the satellites do not affect each other, find the orbital periods T1 and T2 of the two small satellites without using the mass of Pluto.Enter your answers numerically separated by a comma.
Answer:
24.48 days
37.7 days
Explanation:
r = Radius
s denotes satellite
C denotes Charon
Time period is given by
[tex]T=\dfrac{2\pi r^{1.5}}{\sqrt{2GM}}[/tex]
So,
[tex]T\propto r^{1.5}[/tex]
[tex]\dfrac{T_C}{T_{s1}}=\dfrac{r_c^{1.5}}{r_{s1}^{1.5}}\\\Rightarrow T_{s1}=\dfrac{T_Cr_{s1}^{1.5}}{r_C^{1.5}}\\\Rightarrow T_{s1}=\dfrac{6.39\times 86400\times {48000000}^{1.5}}{19600000^{1.5}}\\\Rightarrow T_{s1}=2115886.41242\ s\\\Rightarrow T_{s1}=24.48\ days[/tex]
The time period of the first satellite is 24.48 days
[tex]T_{s2}=\dfrac{T_Cr_{s2}^{1.5}}{r_C^{1.5}}\\\Rightarrow T_{s2}=\dfrac{6.39\times 86400\times {64000000}^{1.5}}{19600000^{1.5}}\\\Rightarrow T_{s2}=3257620.23942\ s\\\Rightarrow T_{s2}=37.7\ days[/tex]
The time period of the second satellite is 37.7 days
A raft of mass 199 kg carries two swimmers of mass 52 kg and 70 kg. The raft is initially floating at rest. The two swimmers simultaneously dive off opposite ends of the raft, each with a horizontal velocity of 4 m/s. With what velocity the raft start to move
To solve this problem we will apply the concept related to the conservation of the Momentum. We will then start considering that the amount of initial momentum must be equal to the amount of final momentum. Considering that all the objects at the initial moment have the same initial velocity (Zero, since they start from rest) the final moment will be equivalent to the multiplication of the mass of each object by the velocity of each object, so
Initial Momentum = Final Momentum
[tex](m_B+m_1+m_2)v_i = m_1v_1+m_2v_2+m_Bv_B[/tex]
Here,
[tex]m_B[/tex] = mass of Raft
[tex]m_1[/tex] = Mass of swimmers 1
[tex]m_2[/tex] = Mass of swimmers 2
[tex]v_i[/tex] = Initial velocity (of the three objects)
[tex]v_B[/tex] = Velocity of Raft
Replacing,
[tex](199+52+70)*0 = (52)(4)+(70)(-4)+199v_B[/tex]
Solving for [tex]v_B[/tex]
[tex]vB = \frac{72}{199}[/tex]
[tex]v_B = 0.3618m/s[/tex]
Therefore the velocity the rarft start to move is 0.3618m/s
A drag racer, starting from rest, travels 6.0 m in 1.0 s. Suppose the car continues this acceleration for an additional 4.0 s. How far from the starting line will the car be? We assume that the acceleration is constant, and the initial speed is zero, so the displacement will scale as the square of the time. After 1.0 s, the car has traveled 6.0 m; after another 4.0 s, a total of 5.0 s will have elapsed. The initial elapsed time was 1.0 s, so the elapsed time increases by a factor of 5. The displacement thus increases by a factor of 5^2, or 25. The total displacement is Delta x = 25(6.0 m) = 150 m This is a big distance in a short time, but drag racing is a fast sport, so our answer makes sense.
Answer:
x = 150.0 m
Explanation:
If the acceleration is constant, we can find the value of the acceleration, starting from rest, applying the following kinematic equation:
x = 1/2*a*t² = 6.0 m
Solving for a:
a = 2*x / t² = 2*6.0 m / 1.0s² = 12 m/s²
Now, during the following 4.0 s, the car continues moving with this acceleration, but its initial velocity is not zero anymore, but the speed at 1.0 s, which is just 12 m/s (as it accelerates 12 m/s each second), so we can write again the same kinematic equation, taking into account that initial velocity for the second part, as follows:
x = x₀ + v₀*t + 1/2*a*t² = 6.0 m + 12m/s*4.0s + 1/2*12 m/s²*(4.0)s² = 150.0 m
⇒ x = 150.0 m
A force F produces an acceleration a on an object of mass m. A force 3F is exerted on a second object, and an acceleration 8a results. What is the mass of the second object in terms of m?
a. 3m
b. 9m
c. 24m
d. (3/8)m
e. (8/3)m
To solve this problem we will proceed to use Newton's second law for which the mass (m) multiplied by the acceleration (a) is defined as the Force (F) applied on a body, mathematically that is,
[tex]F = ma[/tex]
According to the statement for the first object, the acceleration is,
[tex]a = \frac{F}{m} \rightarrow 1^{st} Object[/tex]
For the second object the acceleration is,
[tex]8a = \frac{3F}{m_2} \rightarrow 2^{nd} Object[/tex]
Solving for the mass of the second object,
[tex]m_2 = \frac{3F}{8a}[/tex]
[tex]m_2 = \frac{3F}{8(F/m)}[/tex]
[tex]m_2 = \frac{3}{8}m[/tex]
Therefore the correct answer is D.
Calculate the average power output (in watts) of a photodetector that collects 8.0 x 107 photons in 3.8 ms from monochromatic light of wavelength (a) 470 nm, the wavelength produced by some commercially available light-emitting diodes (LED), and (b) 780 nm, a wavelength produced by lasers that are commonly used in compact disc (CD) players. Hint: The total energy emitted by a source or collected by a detector in a given interval is its power multiplied by the time interval of interest (1 J = 1 W s).
Answer:
[tex]8.90392\times 10^{-9}\ W[/tex]
[tex]5.36518\times 10^{-9}\ W[/tex]
Explanation:
h = Planck's constant = [tex]6.626\times 10^{-34}\ m^2kg/s[/tex]
c = Speed of light = [tex]3\times 10^8\ m/s[/tex]
t = Time taken = 3.8 ms
[tex]\lambda[/tex] = Wavelength
n = Number of protons = [tex]8\times 10^7[/tex]
Power is given by
[tex]P=\dfrac{E}{t}\\\Rightarrow P=\dfrac{nh\dfrac{c}{\lambda}}{t}\\\Rightarrow P=\dfrac{8\times 10^7\times 6.626\times 10^{-34}\times \dfrac{3\times 10^8}{470\times 10^{-9}}}{3.8\times 10^{-3}}\\\Rightarrow P=8.90392\times 10^{-9}\ W[/tex]
The power is [tex]8.90392\times 10^{-9}\ W[/tex]
[tex]P=\dfrac{nh\dfrac{c}{\lambda}}{t}\\\Rightarrow P=\dfrac{8\times 10^7\times 6.626\times 10^{-34}\times \dfrac{3\times 10^8}{780\times 10^{-9}}}{3.8\times 10^{-3}}\\\Rightarrow P=5.36518\times 10^{-9}\ W[/tex]
The power is [tex]5.36518\times 10^{-9}\ W[/tex]
In a crash test, a truck with mass 2100 kg traveling at 22 m/s smashes head-on into a concrete wall without rebounding. The front end crumples so much that the truck is 0.62 m shorter than before.
(a) What is the average speed of the truck during the collision (that is, during the interval between the first contact with the wall and coming to a stop)?
(b) About how long does the collision last? (That is, how long is the interval between first contact with the wall and coming to a stop?)
(c) What is the magnitude of the average force exerted by the wall on the truck during the collision?
(d) It is interesting to compare this force to the weight of the truck. Calculate the ratio of the force of the wall to the gravitational force mg on the truck. This large ratio shows why a collision is so damaging.
(e) What approximations were necessary in making this analysis? (Select all that apply.)
a. Neglect the horizontal component of the force of the road on the truck tires.
b. Assume a nearly constant force exerted by the wall, so the speed changes at a nearly constant rate.
c. The deceleration of the truck is approximately equal to g.
Answer:
a) v_average = 11 m / s, b) t = 0.0627 s
, c) F = 7.37 10⁵ N
, d) F / W = 35.8
Explanation:
a) truck speed can be found with kinematics
v² = v₀² - 2 a x
The fine speed zeroes them
a = v₀² / 2x
a = 22²/2 0.69
a = 350.72 m / s²
The average speed is
v_average = (v + v₀) / 2
v_average = (22 + 0) / 2
v_average = 11 m / s
b) The average time
v = v₀ - a t
t = v₀ / a
t = 22 / 350.72
t = 0.0627 s
c) The force can be found with Newton's second law
F = m a
F = 2100 350.72
F = 7.37 10⁵ N
.d) the ratio of this force to weight
F / W = 7.37 10⁵ / (2100 9.8)
F / W = 35.8
.e) Several approaches will be made:
- the resistance of air and tires is neglected
- It is despised that the force is not constant in time
- Depreciation of materials deformation during the crash
An object thrown straight up a distance ymaxymax. After tt seconds, it falls back and is caught again, just as it reaches the height from which it was thrown. Claudia says its average velocity was zero, and Hossein says its average speed was 2ymaxt2ymaxt . What would you say to help them out?
Answer:
Avg.velocity=(Δy/ Δt) =(net displacement/ total time for journey)
Δy = 0
Δt = t
so avg. velocity = 0/t =0
Avg. speed =(total distance traveled/ total time for journey)
total distance = up +down = Ymax+Ymax= 2 Ymax
total time = t
avg. speed = 2 Ymax/t
Explanation:
Since there is no net displacement from the original position,velocity is zero. Claudia is right!
while it covered some distance in time t so its speed is not as qouted by Hossien
Charge q1 is placed a distance r0 from charge q2 . What happens to the magnitude of the force on q1 due to q2 if the distance between them is reduced to r0/4 ?
What is the electrostatic force between and electron and a proton separated by 0.1 mm?
Answer:
The electrostatic force between and electron and a proton is [tex]F=2.30\times 10^{-20}\ N[/tex]
Explanation:
It is given that, charge [tex]q_1[/tex] is placed at a distance [tex]r_o[/tex] from charge [tex]q_2[/tex]. The force acting between charges is given by :
[tex]F=\dfrac{kq_1q_2}{r_o^2}[/tex]
We need to find the force if the distance between them is reduced to [tex]r_o/4[/tex]. It is given by :
[tex]F'=\dfrac{kq_1q_2}{(r_o/4)^2}[/tex]
[tex]F'=16\times \dfrac{kq_1q_2}{r_o^2}[/tex]
[tex]F'=16\times F[/tex]
So, if the the distance between them is reduced to [tex]r_o/4[/tex], the new force becomes 16 times of the previous force.
The electrostatic force between and electron and a proton separated by 0.1 mm or [tex]10^{-4}\ m[/tex] is :
[tex]F=\dfrac{kq_1q_2}{r_o^2}[/tex]
[tex]F=\dfrac{9\times 10^9\times (1.6\times 10^{-19})^2}{(10^{-4})^2}[/tex]
[tex]F=2.30\times 10^{-20}\ N[/tex]
So, the electrostatic force between and electron and a proton is [tex]F=2.30\times 10^{-20}\ N[/tex]. Hence, this is the required solution.
When the distance between two charges is reduced, the magnitude of the force on one charge due to the other increases. This is because the electrostatic force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the charges.
Explanation:When the distance between two charges, q1 and q2, is reduced from r0 to r0/4, the magnitude of the force on q1 due to q2 increases. This is because the electrostatic force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the charges.
For example, if we have charges q1 = 2 C and q2 = 4 C, and the original distance r0 = 2 m, the force between them would be F = k × (q1 × q2) / r0^2 = k × (2 × 4) / (2^2) = k × 4, where k is the Coulomb's constant.
If we reduce the distance to r0/4 = 0.5 m, the force would become F' = k × q1 × q2) / (r0/4)^2 = k × 4) / (0.5^2) = k ×64, which is 16 times greater than the original force.
A motorboat traveling from one shore to the other at a rate of 5m/s east encounters a current flowing at a rate of 3.5m/s north a. What is the resultant velocity?
Answer:
Resultant velocity will be equal to 6.10 m/sec
Explanation:
We have given a motorbike is traveling with 5 m/sec in east
And a current is flowing at a rate of 3.5 m /sec in north
We know that east and north is perpendicular to each other
So resultant velocity will be vector sum of both velocity
So resultant velocity [tex]v=\sqrt{5^2+3.5^2}=6.10m/sec[/tex]
So resultant velocity will be equal to 6.10 m/sec
You place a point charge q = -4.00 nC a distance of 9.00 cm from an infinitely long, thin wire that has linear charge density 3.00×10−9C/m. What is the magnitude of the electric force that the wire exerts on the point charge?
The question is about calculating the electric force on a point charge near an infinitely long wire using the concepts of electric fields and Coulomb's law within the domain of Physics.
Explanation:The question involves calculating the magnitude of the electric force that an infinitely long, thin wire exerts on a point charge placed at a certain distance from it. This falls under the subject of Physics, specifically dealing with electrostatics and the concept of electric fields and forces.
First, we need to find the electric field due to the wire at the location of the point charge. The electric field E from an infinitely long wire is given by the formula E = (2kλ)/r, where k is Coulomb's constant (8.99 × 109 Nm2/C2), λ is the linear charge density of the wire, and r is the distance from the wire to the point where the electric field is being calculated.
After calculating E, we can find the force exerted on the charge q using F = qE. Since we're given q = -4.00 nC and λ = 3.00×10−9C/m, with r = 9.00 cm, we can substitute these values into the formulas to calculate the electric field and then the force acting on the point charge.
The magnitude of the electric force exerted by the wire on the point charge is 2.40 × 10⁻⁶ N.
To find the magnitude of the electric force that an infinitely long, thin wire with linear charge density λ = 3.00×10⁻⁹ C/m exerts on a point charge q = -4.00 nC placed a distance of 9.00 cm from the wire, we use the principle that an electric field E is created by a line of charge.
The electric field created by an infinitely long, thin wire is given by:
E = (2kλ)/r
where k = 8.99 × 10⁹ Nm²/C²
λ = 3.00×10⁻⁹ C/m , charge density
r = 9 × 10⁻² m
Substitute the given values:
E = (2 × 8.99 × 10⁹ Nm²/C² × 3.00×10⁻⁹ C/m ) / 9 × 10⁻² m
Calculating this, we get:
E ≈ 600 N/C
The force F on the point charge q due to the electric field E is given by:
F = q × E
Since q = -4.00 nC = -4.00 × 10⁻⁹ C:
F = (-4.00 × 10⁻⁹ C) × 600 N/C ≈ -2.40 × 10⁻⁶ N
Therefore, the magnitude of the electric force is 2.40 × 10⁻⁶N.
A mass of 13.9 kg bounces up and down from a spring with constant 9.3 N/m. Toward the bottom of its motion the mass dips into a pool of water and comes back out. The wave created by this process travels away at 5 m/s. What is the associated wavelength of this water wave measured in meters?
Answer:
[tex]\lambda_w=0.6509\ m[/tex]
Explanation:
Given:
mass oscillating with the spring, [tex]m=13.9\ kg[/tex]spring constant, [tex]k=9.3\ N.m^{-1}[/tex]wave velocity on the water surface, [tex]v_w=5\ m.s^{-1}[/tex]Now the angular frequency of the spring oscillation:
[tex]\omega=\sqrt{\frac{k}{m} }[/tex]
[tex]\omega=\sqrt{\frac{9.3}{13.9} }[/tex]
[tex]\omega=0.81796\ rad.s^{-1}[/tex]
Now according to the question the wave is created after each cycle of the spring oscillation.
So the time period of oscillation:
[tex]T=\frac{\omega}{2\pi}[/tex]
[tex]T=\frac{0.81796}{2\pi}[/tex]
[tex]T=0.130182\ s[/tex]
Now the wave length of the water wave:
[tex]\lambda_w=v_w.T[/tex]
[tex]\lambda_w=5\times 0.130182[/tex]
[tex]\lambda_w=0.6509\ m[/tex]
Answer:
Wavelength will be 38.388 m
Explanation:
We have given mass m = 13.9 kg
Spring constant K= 9.3 N/m
Velocity v = 5 m /sec
Angular frequency is given by [tex]\omega =\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}[/tex]
So [tex]\omega =\sqrt{\frac{9.3}{13.9}}=0.817[/tex]
Now we have to find frequency for further calculation
So frequency will be equal to [tex]f=\frac{\omega }{2\pi }=\frac{0.817}{2\times 3.14}=0.130Hz[/tex]
Now we have to find wavelength, it is ratio of velocity and frequency
There is a relation between frequency velocity and wavelength
[tex]v=f\lambda[/tex]
[tex]\lambda =\frac{v}{f}=\frac{5}{0.130}=38.388m[/tex]
A 200 kg chunck of lead falls from a hight of 30m and smashes into a rigid floor. calculate the increse in internal engery
Answer:
[tex]\Delta E=58800\ J[/tex]
Explanation:
Given:
mass of lead chunk, [tex]m=200\ kg[/tex]
height of the fall, [tex]h= 30\ m[/tex]
Assuming the collision to be perfectly inelastic the whole kinetic energy of the chunk is lost after the collision.Here when the chunk is at the given height it has a potential energy which on falling transforms into kinetic energy of the chunk.So, increase in the internal energy of the system after the collision is :
[tex]\Delta E=m.g.h[/tex]
[tex]\Delta E=200\times 9.8\times 30[/tex]
[tex]\Delta E=58800\ J[/tex]
The electrons in a particle beam each have a kinetic energy K. What is the magnitude of the electric field that will stop these electrons in a distance d?
Answer:
Electric field magnitude
E = K/qd
Where
K = kinetic energy of electron
d = electron distance
q = charge
Explanation:
Given the relationship between workdone and energy
Work-energy theorem:
Net workdone = Energy change
W = ∆E
In this case
W = ∆K.E
And,
∆K.E = K(final) - K(initial)
To stop the kinetic energy | K(final) = 0
K(initial) = K (given)
∆K.E = 0 - K = -K
Let the electric force on the electron has magnitude F.
And
W = -Fd = ∆K.E = -K
-Fd = -K
F = K/d .....1
The magnitude of the electric field E that can stop these electron in a distance d:
E = F/q ......2
Where q is the charge on electron.
substituting equation 1 to 2
E = (K/d)/q = K/qd
E = K/qd
How long does it take for a rotating object to speed up from 15.0 sto 33.3 rad/s if it has an angular acceleration of 3.45rad/s2?
a) 9.57 s
b) 5.30 s
c) 63.1 s
d) 4.35 s
Answer:
The time taken by the rotating object to speed up from 15.0 s to 33.3 rad/s is 5.30 seconds.
Explanation:
It is given that,
Initial angular speed of the object, [tex]\omega_o=15\ rad/s[/tex]
Final angular speed of the object, [tex]\omega_f=33.3\ rad/s[/tex]
Angular acceleration of the object, [tex]\alpha =3.45\ rad/s^2[/tex]
Angular acceleration of an object is object is defined as the change in angular velocity per unit time. It is given by :
[tex]\alpha =\dfrac{\omega_f-\omega_i}{t}[/tex]
[tex]t =\dfrac{\omega_f-\omega_i}{\alpha}[/tex]
[tex]t =\dfrac{33.3-15}{3.45}[/tex]
t = 5.30 seconds
So, the time taken by the rotating object to speed up from 15.0 s to 33.3 rad/s is 5.30 seconds. Hence, this is the required solution.
The time taken will be "5.30 seconds".
According to the question,
Initial angular speed,
[tex]\omega_i = 15 \ rad/s[/tex]Final angular speed,
[tex]\omega_f = 33.3 \ rad/s[/tex]Angular acceleration,
[tex]\alpha = 3.45 \ rad/s^2[/tex]As we know,
→ [tex]\alpha = \frac{\omega_f - \omega_i}{t}[/tex]
or,
→ [tex]t = \frac{\omega_f -\omega_i}{\alpha}[/tex]
By substituting the values, we get
[tex]= \frac{33.3-15}{3.45}[/tex]
[tex]= \frac{18.3}{3.45}[/tex]
[tex]= 5.30 \ seconds[/tex]
Thus the above answer i.e., "option b" is right.
Learn more:
https://brainly.com/question/17031696