Answer:
6.1 m
Explanation:
m = Mass of person = 52 kg
h = Altitude
v = Velocity
Kinetic energy of the person on the ground
[tex]\dfrac{1}{2}mv^2=\dfrac{1}{2}52\times 11^2\\ =3146\ J[/tex]
Kinetic energy of the person at the top
[tex]\dfrac{1}{2}52\times 1.2^2\\ =37.44\ J[/tex]
At the top the potential energy is given by
[tex]mgh=52\times 9.8h[/tex]
Balancing the energy of the system
[tex]3146=37.44+52\times 9.8h\\\Rightarrow h=\dfrac{3146-37.44}{52\times 9.8}\\\Rightarrow h=6.1\ m[/tex]
Her altitude is 6.1 m
After takeoff, an airplane climbs at an angle of 30° at a speed of 215 ft/sec. How long does it take for the airplane to reach an altitude of 13,000 ft? (Round your answer to one decimal place.)
Answer:
120.9 seconds
Explanation:
*Attached below is a rough sketch of the problem. Point A represents the point where the airplane climbs 30°, BC represents the altitude of the airplane, AC represents the angular displacement of the airplane.
Parameters given:
Angle of elevation = 30°
Speed (angular) of the airplane = 215 ft/sec
Altitude = 13000 ft
We need to find the angular displacement of the airplane to find the time it takes to get to an altitude of 13000 ft. The angular displacement is represented by the hypotenuse of the triangle. Hence, using SOHCAHTOA,
[tex]sin30^{o} = \frac{13000}{hyp} \\\\hyp = \frac{13000}{sin30^{o}}\\ \\hyp = 26000 ft[/tex]
∴ time taken = [tex]\frac{angular displacement}{angular speed}\\ \\[/tex]
[tex]time taken = \frac{26000}{215} \\\\time taken = 120.9 seconds[/tex]
Therefore, it will take the airplane 120.9 seconds to get to an altitude of 13000 ft.
An object moves 15.0 m north and then 11.0 m south. Find both the distance traveled and the magnitude of the displacement vector.
Answer:
Distance = 26.0m Displacement = 4.0m
Explanation:
Distance specifies only how far an object has traveled while displacement is the distance traveled in a specified direction.
Total distance traveled by the object will be distance travelled through north + distance travelled through south i.e 15.0m + 11.0m = 26.0m
Displacement is gotten by using the Pythagoras theorem. Since the object traveled in the same vertical direction (15.0m through north which is upward i.e positive y direction and 11.0m through south i.e in the negative y direction), the displacement will be 15.0m - 11.0m = 4.0m
The distance traveled is 26.0 m and the magnitude of the displacement vector is 4.0 m
First, we will define the terms distance and displacement
Distance is the total movement of an object without any regard to direction.
Displacement is the difference between the original and final position of a path taken by an object.
Since, the object moves 15.0 m north and then 11.0 m south,
Then,
Distance traveled = 15.0 m + 11.0 m
Distance traveled = 26.0 m
For the magnitude of the displacement,
The object moves 15.0 m north and then 11.0 m south, which is in the opposite (negative) direction
Then,
Magnitude of displacement = 15.0 m - 11.0 m
Magnitude of displacement = 4.0 m
Hence, the distance traveled is 26.0 m and the magnitude of the displacement vector is 4.0 m
Learn more of distance and displacement here: https://brainly.com/question/13065180
The decibel level of an orchestra is 90 db, and the violin section achieves a level of 80 dB. How does the sound intensity from the full orchestra compare to that from the violin section alone?
Final answer:
The sound intensity of the full orchestra is ten times greater than that of the violin section alone because a 10 dB increase corresponds to a tenfold increase in intensity.
Explanation:
The decibel level (dB) measures sound intensity on a logarithmic scale, where each 10 dB increase represents a tenfold increase in intensity. To compare the sound intensity of the full orchestra at 90 dB to the violin section at 80 dB, we can use the fact that an increase of 10 dB corresponds to a tenfold increase in intensity. Therefore, the full orchestra's sound intensity is ten times greater than that of the violin section alone.
This simplifies to 10, meaning that the sound intensity from the full orchestra is 10 times greater than that from the violin section alone.
In simpler terms, when comparing sound intensities, every 10 dB increase corresponds to a tenfold increase in intensity. Therefore, the difference of 10 dB between the full orchestra and the violin section results in the orchestra being 10 times louder in terms of sound intensity.
The sound intensity from the full orchestra is [tex]\( {10} \)[/tex] times greater than the sound intensity from the violin section alone.
To compare the sound intensities of the full orchestra and the violin section, we need to understand the relationship between decibels (dB) and sound intensity [tex]\( I \)[/tex].
The decibel scale is logarithmic and relates to sound intensity [tex]\( I \)[/tex] in the following way:
[tex]\[ \text{dB} = 10 \log_{10} \left( \frac{I}{I_0} \right) \][/tex]
where [tex]\( I \)[/tex] is the sound intensity of interest and [tex]\( I_0 \)[/tex] is the reference intensity (typically [tex]\( I_0 = 10^{-12} \)[/tex] W/m[tex]\(^2\))[/tex].
Step 1: Convert dB to intensity ratio
Given:
- Orchestra sound level [tex]\( L_{\text{orchestra}} = 90 \)[/tex] dB
- Violin section sound level [tex]\( L_{\text{violin}} = 80 \)[/tex] dB
The difference in decibel levels between the orchestra and the violin section gives us the intensity ratio:
[tex]\[ L_{\text{orchestra}} - L_{\text{violin}} = 90 \, \text{dB} - 80 \, \text{dB} = 10 \, \text{dB} \][/tex]
The intensity ratio in terms of decibels is related by:
[tex]\[ 10 \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_{\text{orchestra}}}{I_0} \right) - 10 \log_{10} \left( \frac{I_{\text{violin}}}{I_0} \right) = 10 \][/tex]
Step 2: Calculate the ratio of sound intensities
To find [tex]\( \frac{I_{\text{orchestra}}}{I_{\text{violin}}} \)[/tex]:
[tex]\[ \frac{I_{\text{orchestra}}}{I_{\text{violin}}} = 10^{10 / 10} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \frac{I_{\text{orchestra}}}{I_{\text{violin}}} = 10^{1} \][/tex]
[tex]\[ \frac{I_{\text{orchestra}}}{I_{\text{violin}}} = 10 \][/tex]
A transformer has a 240 V primary and a 60 V secondary. With a 5 ohm load connected, what is the primary current?
The primary current for the given transformer is 3 A which is determined by considering the principle of a transformer, the turns ratio and the law of conservation of power, and calculating secondary current using Ohm's law.
Explanation:To find the primary current of a transformer, we need to first understand the principle of a transformer. A transformer operates on the electromagnetic induction principle, and the ratio of turns in the primary and secondary coil determines how much voltage is changed. In your transformer, the primary voltage is 240 V and the secondary voltage is 60 V. Therefore, the turns ratio is 240/60 which gives a value of 4.
Now, considering the law of conservation of power in an ideal transformer, the power output is equal to the power input. Power is given by the product of voltage and current.
So, primary voltage (V1) times primary current (I1) is equal to secondary voltage (V2) times secondary current (I2). The secondary current (I2) can be calculated using Ohm's law as V2/R, where R is the resistance of the load connected. Plugging in the given values we get
I2 = 60/5 = 12 A.
Now, substituting the known variables in the power conservation equation we get
240*I1 = 60*12.
Solving for I1 gives a value of 3A.
Therefore, the primary current for the given transformer is 3 A.
Learn more about Transformer here:https://brainly.com/question/31663681
#SPJ3
Sound is more effectively transmitted into a stethoscope by direct contact than through the air, and it is further intensified by being concentrated on the smaller area of the eardrum. It is reasonable to assume that sound is transmitted into a stethoscope 100 times as effectively compared with transmission though the air. What, then, is the gain in decibels produced by a stethoscope that has a sound gathering area of 15.0 cm2, and concentrates the sound onto two eardrums with a total area of 1.00 cm2 with an efficiency of 37.0%?
Answer:
Δβ = 28.2 dB
Explanation:
Attached is the explanation
A bullet is fired through a wooden board with a thickness of 9.0 cm. The bullet hits the board perpendicular to it, and with a speed of +370 m/s. The bullet then emerges on the other side of the board with a speed of +259 m/s. Assuming constant acceleration (rather, deceleration!) of the bullet while inside the wooden board, calculate the acceleration.
Remember that since the bullet is traveling in the positive direction and it is slowing down, the acceleration is in the opposite, or negative, direction. (In this case the acceleration is negative.)
Calculate also the total time the bullet is in contact with the board (in sec).
Answer:
-387883.3 m/s²
0.000286168546055 seconds
Explanation:
t = Time taken
u = Initial velocity = 370 m/s
v = Final velocity = 259 m/s
s = Displacement = 9 cm
a = Acceleration
[tex]v^2-u^2=2as\\\Rightarrow a=\dfrac{v^2-u^2}{2s}\\\Rightarrow a=\dfrac{259^2-370^2}{2\times 9\times 10^{-2}}\\\Rightarrow a=-387883.3\ m/s^2[/tex]
The acceleration of the bullet is -387883.3 m/s²
[tex]v=u+at\\\Rightarrow t=\dfrac{v-u}{a}\\\Rightarrow t=\dfrac{259-370}{-387883.3}\\\Rightarrow t=0.000286168546055\ s[/tex]
The time taken is 0.000286168546055 seconds
Final answer:
The acceleration of the bullet is approximately -111 m/s^2 and the total time the bullet is in contact with the board is approximately 0.00081 seconds.
Explanation:
The acceleration of the bullet can be calculated using the equation of motion:
a = (v - u) / t
where a is the acceleration, v is the final velocity, u is the initial velocity, and t is the time. In this case, the initial velocity of the bullet is 370 m/s (positive because it is in the direction of motion) and the final velocity is 259 m/s (positive because it is also in the direction of motion). The time it takes for the bullet to decelerate can be calculated using the equation:
x = ut + (1/2)at^2
where x is the displacement, u is the initial velocity, t is the time, and a is the acceleration. In this case, the displacement is the thickness of the wooden board, which is 9.0 cm (or 0.09 m). Rearranging the equation, we get:
t = (v - u) / a
Substituting the values, we have:
t = (259 - 370) / a
Combining the equations for time and acceleration, we get:
t = (0.09) / (370 - 259) = (0.09) / (111) = 0.00081 seconds.
So, the acceleration of the bullet is approximately -111 m/s^2 (negative because it is in the opposite direction of the bullet's motion) and the total time the bullet is in contact with the board is approximately 0.00081 seconds.
explain how stability and toxicity can work together to increase the effect of a chemical on the environment
Answer:
The concepts of basic chemistry and physics teach us that the more stable a compound would be, the more difficult it will be to break that compound. On the other hand, compounds which are not stable have weak binds and can be broken down easily.
For example, CFC's are stable compounds. It is difficult to break down these compounds and hence they exist in the environment without being broken down. They cause harmful effects on the ozone layer of the Earth.
Two sinusoidal waves are moving through a medium in the positive x-direction, both having amplitudes of 7.00 cm, a wave number of k=3.00m−1, an angular frequency of ω=2.50s−1, and a period of 6.00 s, but one has a phase shift of an angle ϕ=π12rad. What is the height of the resultant wave at a time t=2.00s and a position x=0.53m?
The question combines the principles of wave mechanics, specifically sinusoidal waves, to calculate the height of a resultant wave at a certain time and position. This is done by applying values to the formula y (x, t) = A sin (kx - wt +φ), where A, k, w and φ stand for amplitude, wave number, angular frequency and phase shift respectively. Applying the values of the moving sinusoidal waves, you can solve for the height of the resultant wave.
Explanation:A sinusoidal wave is represented by the equation y (x, t) = A sin (kx — wt + φ). Here A is the amplitude, k is wave number, w is the angular frequency and φ is the phase shift. Given two sinusoidal waves, moving through a medium, both having the equal amplitude (7.00 cm), wave number (k=3.00m−1) and angular frequency (ω=2.50s−1), but with one having a phase shift of π/12 radians, the resultant wave has an amplitude of AR = [2A cos(φ/2)] and a phase shift equal to half the original phase shift.
Applying these values to the equation y (x, t) = AR sin (kx - wt + φ/2), we have y = 2*7* cos(π/12/2) cm * sin(3.00m−1 *0.53m — 2.50s−1* 2.00s + π/12 /2), thus we can calculate the height of the resultant wave at a particular position and time.
Learn more about Sinusoidal Waves here:https://brainly.com/question/33443431
#SPJ12
The height of the resultant wave at [tex]\( t = 2.00 \, \text{s} \) and \( x = 0.53 \, \text{m} \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{-13.965 \, \text{cm}} \][/tex].
The height of the resultant wave at time [tex]\( t = 2.00 \, \text{s} \)[/tex] and position [tex]\( x = 0.53 \, \text{m} \)[/tex] is given by the sum of the two individual waves, taking into account their respective phase shifts.
The general equation for a sinusoidal wave moving in the positive x-direction is:
[tex]\[ y(x,t) = A \cos(kx - \omega t + \phi) \][/tex]
[tex]where \( A \) is the amplitude, \( k \) is the wave number, \( \omega \) is the angular frequency, \( \phi \) is the phase shift, \( x \) is the position, and \( t \) is the time.[/tex]
For the first wave with no phase shift, the equation is:
[tex]\[ y_1(x,t) = 7.00 \cos(3.00x - 2.50t) \][/tex]
For the second wave with a phase shift [tex]\( \phi = \frac{\pi}{12} \)[/tex], the equation is:
[tex]\[ y_2(x,t) = 7.00 \cos(3.00x - 2.50t + \frac{\pi}{12}) \]\\ At \( t = 2.00 \, \text{s} \) and \( x = 0.53 \, \text{m} \), we substitute these values into the equations for \( y_1 \) and \( y_2 \): \[ y_1(0.53,2.00) = 7.00 \cos(3.00 \cdot 0.53 - 2.50 \cdot 2.00) \] \[ y_1(0.53,2.00) = 7.00 \cos(1.59 - 5.00) \] \[ y_1(0.53,2.00) = 7.00 \cos(-3.41) \][/tex]
Since the cosine function is even, [tex]\( \cos(-3.41) = \cos(3.41) \)[/tex], we can write:
[tex]\[ y_1(0.53,2.00) = 7.00 \cos(3.41) \][/tex]
For the second wave:
[tex]\[ y_2(0.53,2.00) = 7.00 \cos(3.00 \cdot 0.53 - 2.50 \cdot 2.00 + \frac{\pi}{12}) \] \[ y_2(0.53,2.00) = 7.00 \cos(1.59 - 5.00 + \frac{\pi}{12}) \] \[ y_2(0.53,2.00) = 7.00 \cos(-3.41 + \frac{\pi}{12}) \] The resultant wave \( y \) is the sum of \( y_1 \) and \( y_2 \): \[ y(0.53,2.00) = y_1(0.53,2.00) + y_2(0.53,2.00) \] \[ y(0.53,2.00) = 7.00 \cos(3.41) + 7.00 \cos(-3.41 + \frac{\pi}{12}) \][/tex]
To find the numerical value, we calculate the cosines:
[tex]\[ y(0.53,2.00) = 7.00 \cos(3.41) + 7.00 \cos(-3.41 + \frac{\pi}{12}) \] \[ y(0.53,2.00) = 7.00 \cos(3.41) + 7.00 \cos(-3.41 + 0.2618) \] \[ y(0.53,2.00) = 7.00 \cos(3.41) + 7.00 \cos(-3.1482) \][/tex]
Using a calculator or trigonometric tables, we find:
[tex]\[ y(0.53,2.00) = 7.00 \cdot (-0.9956) + 7.00 \cdot (-0.9994) \] \[ y(0.53,2.00) = -6.9692 - 6.9958 \] \[ y(0.53,2.00) = -13.965 \][/tex]
Therefore, the height of the resultant wave at [tex]\( t = 2.00 \, \text{s} \) and \( x = 0.53 \, \text{m} \)[/tex] is:
[tex]\[ \boxed{-13.965 \, \text{cm}} \][/tex]
The negative sign indicates that the displacement is in the negative y-direction.
A parachutist of mass 39.4 kg jumps out of an airplane at a height of 1340 m and lands on the ground with a speed of 5.78 m/s. The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s². How much energy was lost to air friction during this jump?
Answer:
Approximately 500kJ
Explanation:
According to the law of conservation of energy which states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed but can be converted from one form to another.
A parachutist jumping out of the airplane covering a particular height and under the influence of gravity will possess potential energy during fall. Since PE = mass × acceleration due to gravity × height
PE = 39.4×1340×9.8
PE = 501,562Joules
If the body lands on the ground with a speed of 5.78m/s, this means the body possesses kinetic energy at the point of landing. The kinetic energy on landing is 1/2mv²
KE = 1/2×39.4×5.78²
KE = 658.14Joules
The amount of energy lost due to friction will be PE-KE
= 501,562-658.14
= 500,903Joules approximately 500kJ
Final answer:
The solution involves calculating the parachutist's initial potential energy and final kinetic energy, then finding the difference to determine the energy lost to air friction during the jump.
Explanation:
The question asks how much energy was lost to air friction during the jump of a parachutist who has a mass of 39.4 kg, jumps from a height of 1340 m, and lands with a speed of 5.78 m/s. To find the energy lost to air friction, we first calculate the potential energy at the start and the kinetic energy at the end of the jump, then find the difference.
Initial potential energy (PE_initial) is given by mgh, where m is mass, g is acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s²), and h is height. Therefore, PE_initial = 39.4 kg * 9.8 m/s² * 1340 m.
Final kinetic energy (KE_final) is given by 1/2 mv², where m is mass and v is velocity at landing. Thus, KE_final = 1/2 * 39.4 kg * (5.78 m/s)².
The energy lost to air friction equals the initial potential energy minus the final kinetic energy. Subtracting KE_final from PE_initial gives the amount of energy lost to air resistance.
In one contest at the county fair, a spring-loaded plunger launches a ball at a speed of 3.2m/s from one corner of a smooth, flat board that is tilted up at a 20 degree angle. To win, you must make the ball hit a small target at the adjacent corner, 2.40m away. At what angle theta should you tilt the ball launcher?
Answer:
Explanation:
Given
Speed of ball [tex]u=3.2\ m/s[/tex]
Plane is inclined at an angle [tex]20^{\circ}[/tex]
To win the Game we need to hit the target at [tex]x=2.4\ m[/tex] away
Launch angle of ball [tex]\theta [/tex]
Motion of ball can be considered in two planes i.e. Vertical to the plane and horizontal to the plane
So Net acceleration in vertical plane is [tex]g\sin 20[/tex]
Range of Projectile is given by
[tex]R=\frac{u^2\sin 2\theta }{g}[/tex]
for [tex]R=2.4\ m[/tex]
[tex]2.4=\frac{3.2^2\times sin 2\theta }{g\sin 20}[/tex]
[tex]\sin 2\theta =\frac{2.4\times 9.8\times \sin 20}{3.2^2}[/tex]
[tex]\sin 2\theta =0.7855[/tex]
[tex]2\theta =51.77[/tex]
[tex]\theta =25.88^{\circ}[/tex]
so ball must be launched at an angle of [tex]25.88^{\circ}[/tex]
To answer this, we use projectile motion principles with an equation specifically structured for the problem. Inserting the given values into the equation derived from the horizontal and vertical equations of motion, we can find the required launching angle to hit the target.
Explanation:To solve this problem, we can apply the concepts found in projectile motion physics. Given the initial speed or velocity (3.2 m/s) and the horizontal distance of the target (2.4 m) we can find the necessary angle (theta) to hit the target. The angle θ can be given by the equation of motion for a projectile which can be derived from the horizontal and vertical equations of motion, θ = atan[(vf² ± sqrt(vf⁴ - g*(g*x² + 2*y*vf²)) / (g*x)] where g = 9.8 m/s² is the acceleration due to gravity, x = 2.4 m is the horizontal distance, y = 0 (height difference), and vf = 3.2 m/s is the final velocity, the speed at which the ball is launched.
Learn more about Projectile Motion here:https://brainly.com/question/20627626
#SPJ3
The height of a typical playground slide is about 6 ft and it rises at an angle of 30 ∘ above the horizontal.
a.)Some children like to slide down while sitting on a sheet of wax paper. This makes the friction force exerted by the slide very small. If a child starts from rest and we take the friction force to be zero, what is the speed of the child when he reaches the bottom of the slide?
b.)If the child doesn't use the wax paper, his speed at the bottom is half the value calculated in part A. What is the coefficient of kinetic friction between the child and the slide when wax paper isn't used? μk = ?
I found the answer to part a, it is 3m/s, but I need part b. Please show all steps, thank you!
Answer:
What is the coefficient of kinetic friction = 0.432
Explanation:
The detailed steps and derivation with appropriate substitution is as shown in the attached file.
This question involves the concepts of the law of conservation of energy and frictional energy.
a) The speed of the child when he reaches the bottom of the slide is "6 m/s".
b) The coefficient of kinetic friction between the child and slide when the wax paper isn't used is "0.432".
a)
According to the law of conservation of energy in this situation:
Loss in Potential Energy = Gain in Kinetic Energy
[tex]mgh = \frac{1}{2}mv^2\\\\2gh=v^2\\v=\sqrt{2gh}\\\\[/tex]
where,
v = velocity = ?
g = acceleration due to gravity = 9.81 m/s²
h = height lost = 6 ft = 1.83 m
Therefore,
[tex]v=\sqrt{2(9.81\ m/s^2)(1.83\ m)}[/tex]
v = 6 m/s
b)
Now, the velocity becomes half and the friction comes into action. So in this case the law of conservation of energy will be written as:
Loss of Potential Energy = Gain of Kinetic Energy + Frictional Energy
[tex]mgh=\frac{1}{2}m(\frac{v}{2})^2+\mu_kRl\\\\mgh=\frac{1}{2}m(\frac{v}{2})^2+\mu_kmgCos\theta l\\\\gh-\frac{1}{2}(\frac{v}{2})^2+\mu_kgCos\theta l[/tex]
where,
l = length of slide = [tex]\frac{h}{sin\theta}=\frac{1.83\ m}{sin30^o}=3.66\ m[/tex]
[tex]\mu_k[/tex] = coefficient of kinetic friction = ?
Therefore,
[tex](9.81\ m/s^2)(1.83\ m)-\frac{1}{2}(\frac{6\ m/s}{2})^2=\mu_k(9.81\ m/s^2)(Cos30^o)(3.66\ m)\\\\\mu_k=\frac{13.45\ m^2/s^2}{31.09\ m^2/s^2}\\\\\mu_k=0.432[/tex]
Learn more about the law of conservation of energy here:
brainly.com/question/20971995?referrer=searchResults
The attached picture explains the law of conservation of energy.
A localized electron has been polarized so that its spin is oriented in the positive z- direction. It is now subject to the application of a constant uniform magnetic field B = Bî along x over a period of time of duration T. After that, it is subject to the application of another magnetic field of the same magnitude B but along y: B2 = Bý, also with duration T. (a) What is the probability P that the spin-flip would occur as a result? That is, what is the probability that the spin of the electron would be found oriented in the negative z-direction after the application of the magnetic fields is over? (b) Is it possible to find such duration that the spin-flip would occur with certainty: P = 1? If yes, what would be that time r?
Answer: The answer is attached
Explanation:
Final answer:
In quantum mechanics, the probability of a spin-flip and the potential for achieving a spin flip with certainty are explored through the application of magnetic fields in different directions.
Explanation:
P(a): The probability that the spin-flip would occur can be calculated using quantum mechanics. When applying magnetic fields B along x and y, the probability of finding the spin of the electron oriented in the negative z-direction after is over is determined by the transition probabilities.
P(b): The time to ensure a spin flip with certainty (P = 1) can be calculated by adjusting the duration of the magnetic field application. By manipulating the duration, the spin can be controlled to achieve a certain outcome at a specific time.
A 100-watt electric incandescent light bulb consumes __________ J of energy in 24 hours. [1 Watt (W)
Answer : The energy consumed by bulb in 24 hours is, 8.64 × 10⁶ J
Explanation :
As we are given that:
1 watt = 1 J/s
So,
100 watt = 100 J/s
Now we have to calculate the energy consumed by bulb in 24 hours.
As we know that:
1 hr = 60 min
1 min= 60 sec
So,
24 hr = 24 × 60 × 60 sec = 86400 sec
As, the energy consumed by bulb in 1 second = 100 J
So, the energy consumed by bulb in 86400 second = 86400 × 100 J
= 8.64 × 10⁶ J
Thus, the energy consumed by bulb in 24 hours is, 8.64 × 10⁶ J
To calculate the energy consumed by a 100-watt electric incandescent light bulb in 24 hours, we use the formula E = Pt, where E is the energy in joules (J), P is the power in watts (W), and t is the time in seconds (s). In this case, the energy consumed is 8640000 J.
Explanation:To calculate the electrical energy used by a 100-watt electric incandescent light bulb in 24 hours, we can use the formula E = Pt, where E is the energy in joules (J), P is the power in watts (W), and t is the time in seconds (s).
First, we need to convert the time from hours to seconds. There are 3600 seconds in an hour. So, 24 hours is equal to 24 x 3600 = 86400 seconds.
Now, we can substitute the values into the formula. E = 100W x 86400s = 8640000 J.
Learn more about Calculating electrical energy consumption here:https://brainly.com/question/34856812
#SPJ3
A flying dragon is rising vertically at a constant speed of 6.0m/s. When the dragon is 30.0m above the ground, the rider on its back drops a small golden egg which, subsequently, is in free fall.
a) What is the maximum height above the ground reached by the egg?
b) How long after its release does the egg hit the ground?
c) What is the egg’s velocity immediately before it hits the ground?
d) Sketch, qualitatively, position, velocity, and acceleration of the egg as functions of time.
Final answer:
The detailed response covers the maximum height reached by the egg, the time it takes to hit the ground, and its velocity just before landing.a)60.0m,b)2.45 seconds,c)-6.0m/s.
Explanation:
a) Maximum Height: The maximum height above the ground reached by the egg can be calculated using the kinematic equation. It will be twice the initial height. In this case, it would be 60.0m.
b) Time to Hit Ground: You can determine the time it takes for the egg to hit the ground by using the kinematic equation for vertical motion. The time would be approximately 2.45 seconds after its release.
c) Velocity Before Landing: The velocity of the egg immediately before hitting the ground would be the same as the initial velocity when it was thrown, but in the opposite direction, which is -6.0m/s.
According to the cartoon video on physics, electrons sent through 2 slits at once without measuring what slit is goes through, will produce what?
A) An interference pattern
B) A single line
C) 4 lines
D) A blank screen
Answer:
A) An interference pattern
Explanation:
the two slit experiment is key to understand the microscopic world. The wave-like properties of light were demonstrated by the famous experiment first performed by Thomas Young in the early nineteenth century. In original experiment, a point source of light illuminates two narrow adjacent slits in a screen, and the image of the light that passes through the slits is observed on a second screen.
Key Points
waves can interfere, for light this will make a series of light and dark bands matter particles, such as electrons, also produce interference patterns due to their wave-like nature so with a high flux of either photons or electrons, the characteristic interference pattern is visiblea beam containing a mixture of helium isotopes enters a mass spectrometer. The beam then divides into two beams that each travel to a different point on the detector. Which property do the particles in the two beams have in common?
A. each particle has the same mass
B. Each particle is a helium atom, not an ion
C. Each particle contains the same number of neutrons
D. Each particle has the same initial velocity
Answer: did you get the answer(s) by chance?
Explanation:
Answer:
The last one
Explanation:
Erica (39kg \;kg ) and Danny (45kg \;kg ) are bouncing on a trampoline. Just as Erica reaches the high point of her bounce, Danny is moving upward past her at 4.8m/s \; m/s . At that instant he grabs hold of her.
What is their speed just after he grabs her?
help please
can you show formula too
Answer:
2.57 m/s
Explanation:
mass of Erica (ME) = 39 kg
velocity of Erica (VE) = 0 m/s (since she is at her high point of her jump, her velocity will be 0)
mass of Danny (MD) = 45 kg
velocity of Danny (VD) = 4.8 m/s
from the conservation of momentum total initial momentum is equal to the total final momentum
total initial momentum = final initial momentum
(ME)(VE) + (MD)(VD) = (ME + MD) V
where "V" is the velocity of Erica and Danny after Danny grabs her.
(39 x 0) + (45 x 4.8) = (39 + 45) x V
0 + 216 = 84 V
V = 216 / 84 = 2.57 m/s
The speed just after Danny grabs Erica is equal to 2.57 m/s.
Given the following data:
Mass of Erica = 39 kgMass of Danny = 45 kgVelocity of Erica = 0 m/s (since she is at the highest point)Velocity of Danny = 4.8 m/sTo determine their speed just after Danny grabs Erica, we would apply the law of conservation of momentum:
[tex]M_EV_E + M_DV_D = (M_E + M_D)V_{f}[/tex]
Where:
[tex]M_E[/tex] is the mass of Erica.[tex]M_D[/tex] is the mass of Danny.[tex]V_f[/tex] is the final speed.[tex]V_E[/tex] is the speed of the Erica.[tex]V_D[/tex] is the speed of the Danny.Substituting the given parameters into the formula, we have;
[tex]39 \times 0 + 45 \times 4.8 = (39 +45)V_f\\\\0+216=84V_f\\\\V_f = \frac{216}{84} \\\\V_f = 2.57 \;m/s[/tex]
Final speed = 2.57 m/s
Read more: https://brainly.com/question/22599382
The volume of gas in a container is 125,000 liters, and the pressure is 1.2 atmospheres. Suppose the temperature remains constant, and the pressure changes to 1.6 atmospheres. What is the new volume of the gas in liters?
Answer:
the new volume =93,750 Liters
Explanation:
From Boyles law
P1V1 = P2V2
1.2 X 125000 = 1.6 X V2
V2 = 93,750 Liters
A light ray passes from air through a glass plate with refractive index 1.60 into water. The angle of the refracted ray in the water is 42.0°. Determine the angle of the incident ray at the air-glass interface?
Answer:
The angle of the incident ray at the air-glass interface is 62.86°
Explanation:
Given that,
Refractive index of glass =1.60
Angle = 42°
We need to calculate the angle of the incident ray at glass-water interface
Using Snell's law
[tex]n_{2}\sin\theta_{2}=n_{3}\sin\theta_{3}[/tex]
Where, [tex]n_{2}[/tex] = refractive index of glass
[tex]n_{3}[/tex] = refractive index of water
[tex]\theta_{3}[/tex] = angle of refraction
Put the value into the formula
[tex]1.6\sin\theta_{2}=1.33\sin42[/tex]
[tex]\sin\theta_{2}=\dfrac{1.33\sin42}{1.6}[/tex]
[tex]\theta_{2}=\sin^{-1}(\dfrac{1.33\sin42}{1.6})[/tex]
[tex]\theta_{2}=33.8^{\circ}[/tex]
We need to calculate the angle of the incident ray at the air-glass interface
Using Snell's law
[tex]n_{1}\sin\theta_{1}=n_{2}\sin\theta_{2}[/tex]
Where, [tex]n_{1}[/tex] = refractive index of air
[tex]n_{2}[/tex] = refractive index of glass
[tex]\theta_{1}[/tex] = angle of incident
Put the value into the formula
[tex]1\sin\theta_{1}=1.6\sin33.8[/tex]
[tex]\theta=\sin^{-1}(1.6\sin33.8)[/tex]
[tex]\theta=62.86^{\circ}[/tex]
Hence, The angle of the incident ray at the air-glass interface is 62.86°
Answer:
62.8 degree
Explanation:
Let the incident ray incident at an angle [tex]\theta_1[/tex] at air glass surface.
[tex]\theta_3=42^{\circ}[/tex]=Angle of refraction when ray travel from glass to water
[tex]\theta_2=[/tex]Angle of refraction when the ray travel from air to glass
Refractive index of glass,[tex]n_2=1.6[/tex]
We know that
Refractive index of water=[tex]n_3=1.33[/tex]
Snell's law
[tex]n_1sin\theta_1=n_2sin\theta_2[/tex]
Where [tex]\theta_1[/tex]=Angle of incidence
[tex]\theta_2=[/tex]Angle of refraction
[tex]n_1=[/tex]Refractive index of medium 1
[tex]n_2=[/tex]Refractive index of medium 2
When the ray travel from glass to water
[tex]n_2sin\theta_2=n_3sin\theta_3[/tex]
Where [tex]n_2=[/tex]Refractive index of medium 1(Glass)
[tex]n_3[/tex]=Refractive index of medium 2 (Water)
[tex]\theta_2=[/tex]Angle of incidence
[tex]\theta_3[/tex]=Angle of refraction
Substitute the values
[tex]1.6sin\theta_2=1.33sin42[/tex]
[tex]sin\theta_2=\frac{1.33sin42}{1.6}[/tex]
[tex]sin\theta_2=0.556[/tex]
[tex]\theta_2=sin^{-1}(0.556)=33.8^{\circ}[/tex]
Angle of refraction when ray travel from air to glass= Angle of incidence of when ray travel from glass to water
Angle of refraction when the ray travel from air to glass=33.8 degree
Refractive index of air=[tex]n_1=1[/tex]
Again apply Snell's law
[tex]n_1sin\thet_1=n_2sin\theta_2[/tex]
[tex]1\times sin\theta_1=1.6sin(33.8)[/tex]
[tex]sin\theta_1=1.6\times 0.556=0.8896[/tex]
[tex]\theta_1=sin^{-1}(0.8896)=62.8^{\circ}[/tex]
Hence, the angle of the incident ray at the air-glass interface=62.8 degree
Both Kepler’s laws and Newton’s laws tell us something about the motion of the planets, but there are fundamental differences between them. What are the differences? Select all of the true statements.
Kepler's laws describe the motion of planets based on empirical observations without explaining why they behave in such a way. Newton's laws, particularly the law of universal gravitation, provide the reasons for these behaviors, explaining them using cause-effect relationships.
The fundamental differences between Kepler's laws and Newton's laws pertain to their descriptions of planetary motion. Kepler's laws are based on the empirical observations and provide a descriptive perspective on the motion of planets around the Sun in an elliptical orbit. They consist of three essential laws: the Law of Orbits, Law of Areas, and Law of Periods.
Newton's laws, on the other hand, provide an explanatory perspective grounded in cause-effect relationships. These laws, especially the law of universal gravitation, explain why the planets follow an elliptical orbit as Kepler observed, based on the gravitational influence of the Sun.
So, Kepler's laws describe what happens, and Newton's laws explain why it happens.https://brainly.com/question/31460815
#SPJ11
The differences between Kepler's laws and Newton's laws are that Kepler described planetary motion through empirical observations, while Newton explained it theoretically with universal laws applicable to all motions in the universe.
The true statements regarding the differences between Kepler's laws and Newton's laws are:
A. Kepler reported how planets moved, and Newton explained why.
Kepler's laws describe the observed motions of planets, while Newton's laws provide a theoretical explanation for these motions based on the law of universal gravitation.
B. Kepler defined laws based on one special case - the observed motions of planets in the Solar System, while Newton defined theoretical laws that describe the general behavior of all motions in the universe.
Kepler's laws were specific to planetary motion in the Solar System, while Newton's laws of motion and the law of universal gravitation are general laws that apply to all objects and motions in the universe.
D. Kepler's approach was empirical, while Newton's was theoretical.
Kepler's laws were derived from observations, making his approach empirical. In contrast, Newton's laws were based on theoretical principles, including the law of universal gravitation.
To know more about solar system:
https://brainly.com/question/34533168
#SPJ12
The question is incomplete, the given complete question is:
"Both Kepler's laws and Newton's laws tell us something about the motion of the planets, but there are fundamental differences between them. What are the differences? Select all of the true statements. Choose one or more: O A. Kepler reported how planets moved, and Newton explained why. B. Kepler defined laws based on one special case-the observed motions of planets in the Solar System, while Newton defined theoretical laws that describe the general behavior of all motions in the universe O C. Kepler's discoveries built on the work of an earlier astronomer, while Newton's did not. OD. Kepler's approach was empirical, while Newton's was theoretical."
Calculate the speed of a proton having a kinetic energy of 0.995 × 10−19 J and a mass of 1.673 × 10−27 kg. Answer in units of m/s.
Answer:
1.19×10²² m/s
Explanation:
Kinetic Energy: This can be defined as the the energy of a body due to motion.
The formula for kinetic energy is given as,
Ek = 1/2mv²................... Equation 1
Where Ek = Kinetic energy, m = mass of proton. v = velocity of proton.
Making v the subject of the equation,
v = √(2Ek/m).................. Equation 2.
Given: Ek = 0.995×10⁻⁵ J, m = 1.673×10⁻²⁷ kg.
Substitute into equation 2
v = √(2×0.995×10⁻⁵/1.673×10⁻²⁷ )
v = 1.19×10²² m/s.
Therefore, the velocity of proton = 1.19×10²² m/s
What frequency (in Hz) is received by a person watching an oncoming ambulance moving at 108 km/h and emitting a steady 900 Hz sound from its siren? The speed of sound on this day is 345 m/s.
Answer:985.71 Hz
Explanation:
Given
Speed of ambulance (source) [tex]v_s=108\ kmph\approx 30\ m/s[/tex]
Original Frequency of sound wave [tex]f=900\ Hz[/tex]
speed of sound waves [tex]v=345\ m/s[/tex]
According to Doppler apparent frequency will be different to original frequency when speed of source is moving w.r.t to observer.
[tex]f'=f(\frac{v+v_o}{v-v_s})[/tex]
where f'=apparent frequency
f=original frequency
[tex]v_o[/tex]=observer speed
[tex]f'=900\times (\frac{345+0}{345-30})[/tex]
[tex]f'=900\times (\frac{345}{315})[/tex]
[tex]f'=985.71\ Hz[/tex]
Consider a spherical Gaussian surface and three charges: q1 = 1.60 μC , q2 = -2.61 μC , and q3 = 3.67 μC . Find the electric flux through the Gaussian surface if it completely encloses (a) only charges q1 and q2, (b) only charges q2 and q3, and (c) all three charges.
Answer:
Explanation:
Guass Law: Also known as "Gauss's flux theorem" is the total of the electric flux "φ" out of a closed surface is equal to the charge "Q" enclosed divided by the permittivity εο. Solution is attached.The electric flux through a Gaussian surface can be calculated using Gauss's law. (a) Calculate electric flux for q1 and q2, (b) Calculate electric flux for q2 and q3, (c) Calculate electric flux for all three charges.
Explanation:The electric flux through a Gaussian surface can be calculated using Gauss's law. Gauss's law states that the total electric flux through a closed surface is equal to the net charge enclosed by that surface divided by the permittivity of free space.
(a) To find the electric flux through the Gaussian surface enclosing only charges q1 and q2, we need to calculate the net charge enclosed by the surface, which is the sum of the two charges. Then, we divide this sum by the permittivity of free space to obtain the electric flux.
(b) Following the same procedure, we can find the electric flux through the Gaussian surface enclosing only charges q2 and q3.
(c) To find the electric flux through the Gaussian surface enclosing all three charges, we calculate the net charge enclosed by the surface, which is the sum of all three charges. Again, we divide this sum by the permittivity of free space to obtain the electric flux.
Learn more about Electric Flux here:https://brainly.com/question/32826728
#SPJ3
The liquid in one container drops 100 F, while the same liquid in a different container drops 100C. How does the change in thermal energy in the two compare? Explain your answer.
Answer:
Explanation:
The thermal energy is given as
E=mc(T2-T1)
For the temperature change.
ΔT can be expressed in units of Kelvin or degrees Celsius. The ΔT of Kelvin is equal to that of ΔT of Celsius but not equal to the ΔT of Fahrenheit.
Therefore change in temperature of 100F is not equal to change in temperature of 100C
°F= 9/5 °C +32
So let assume 20°C, so the increase of 100°C will give 120°C.
Then °F = 68°F
Now the equivalent of 20°C is 68°F.
So let see the value of 120°C, which is the increase given.
°F= 9/5 ×120+32
°F= 248°F
The change in temp in Fahrenheit is 248-68=180°F
1°F change is = to 0.56°C change
Therefore, 100°F change in temperature in Fahrenheit is equal to 56°C in Celsius
Therefore the thermal energy is not the same, since they have are the same mass and specific heat but different changer in temperature.
So using the formulae given above, the thermal energy of the 100F change is greater than that of the 100C change..
A temperature drop of 100°C corresponds to a larger change in thermal energy than a drop of 100°F because 100°C equates to a more substantial temperature change (around 180°F). The container with the 100°C temperature drop, therefore, experiences a greater thermal energy change.
Explanation:In comparing the change in thermal energy of liquids with a temperature drop of 100°F and 100°C, understanding that 1°C is equal to 1.8°F is crucial. To compare the energy change between the two, we must first recognize that the change of 100°F is approximately equivalent to a change of 55.5°C (100°F / 1.8 = 55.5°C).
Since the specific heat capacity is a property of a material that indicates how much heat energy it requires to change its temperature by a single degree, and this value is typically given in J/g°C, it is clear that a larger temperature change in Celsius would require more energy. Therefore, the container experiencing a drop of 100°C will require the removal of more thermal energy compared to the container with a drop of 100°F.
A pitcher throws a 0.15 kg baseball so that it crosses home plate horizontally with a speed of 20 m/s. It is hit straight back at the pitcher with a final speed of 25 m/s. Assume the direction of the initial motion of the baseball to be positive.(a) What is the impulse delivered to the ball? (b) Find the average force exerted by the bat on the ball if the two are in contact for 2.0?
Answer:
a.-6.75 kgm/s
b.[tex]3375 N[/tex]
Explanation:
We are given that
Mass of baseball=0.15 kg
Initial speed=[tex]u=20m/s[/tex]
Final speed=[tex]v=-25m/s[/tex]
a.We know that
Impulse=Change in momentum=[tex]\Delta p=mv-mu=m(v-u)[/tex]
Momentum=[tex]mass\times velocity[/tex]
Using the formula
Impulse=[tex]0.15(-25-20)=-6.75 kgm/s[/tex]
b.Time=[tex]2\times 10^{-3} s[/tex]
Force=[tex]\frac{Impulse}{time}[/tex]
Using the formula
Average force exerted by the bat on the ball=[tex]\frac{-6.75}{2\times 10^{-3}}[/tex] N
Average force exerted by the bat on the ball=[tex]3375N[/tex]
A 0.500 kg pendulum bob passes through the lowest part of its path at a speed of 3.40 m/s.
(a) What is the tension in the pendulum cable at this point if the pendulum is 80.0 cm long? (in Newtons)
(b) When the pendulum reaches its highest point, what angle does the cable make with the vertical? (in Degrees)
(c) What is the tension in the pendulum cable when the pendulum reaches its highest point? (in Newtons)
Final answer:
The tension in the pendulum at the lowest point is 12.1 N. Without additional information, we cannot determine the exact angle at which the pendulum reaches its highest point. The tension in the pendulum at the highest point is 4.9 N.
Explanation:
Tension in the Pendulum Cable
To determine the tension in the pendulum cable at the lowest point, we can use the formula for circular motion.
T = mg + m(v^2/r)
Where:
g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s²)
r is the length of the pendulum
Substituting the values given, we have:
T = 0.500 kg * 9.8 m/s² + 0.500 kg * (3.40 m/s)^2 / 0.80 m
Now, we can calculate the tension:
T = 4.9 N + 7.225 N
T ≈ 12.1 N
The Angle at the Highest Point
To find the angle at the highest point, we use the principle of conservation of energy. The kinetic energy at the lowest point equals potential energy at the highest point.
mgh = 1/2 mv^2
Solving for h gives us h = v^2/(2g), and then use trigonometry to find the angle θ.
h = r(1 - cosθ)
Without sufficient information to calculate the speed of the pendulum, we must leave the answer as an open calculation.
Tension at the Highest Point
At the highest point, the tension is equal to the weight of the pendulum alone since it is momentarily at rest, and there is no centripetal force required.
T = mg
Thus, the tension at the highest point will be:
T = 0.500 kg * 9.8 m/s² = 4.9 N.
If an astronaut goes on a space walk outside the Space Station, she will quickly float away from the station unless she has a tether holding her to the station. Part A Choose the correct explanation why does the statement make sense (or is clearly true) or does not make sense (or is clearly false). Choose the correct explanation why does the statement make sense (or is clearly true) or does not make sense (or is clearly false).
a. This statement is true. She and the Space Station have different orbits at the beginning and will move apart.
b. This statement is true. She and the Space Station cannot share the same orbit and will move apart quickly.
c. This statement is false. She and the Space Station have different orbits at the beginning but will stay together due to mutual gravity.
d. This statement is false. She and the Space Station share the same orbit and will stay together unless they are pushed apart.
Answer:
d. This statement is false. She and the Space Station share the same orbit and will stay together unless they are pushed apart.
Explanation:
In astronomy, orbit is simply a path of an object around another object in a space. That is, orbit is a path of a body that revolves around a gravitating center of mass. Examples of an orbit is are satellite around a planet, orbit around a center of galaxy, planet around the sun, and among others.
On the other hand, space station refers to a spacecraft that can support a group of human for long time in the orbit. Another names for space stations are orbital space station and orbital station.
Therefore, an astronaut goes on a space walk outside the Space Station shares the same orbit with the space station and they will stay together unless they are pushed apart.
The statement is true that an astronaut would float away during a spacewalk if not tethered. The astronaut and ISS, although influencing each other gravitationally to a small extent, they would continue along their separate paths under the influence of Earth's gravity and microgravity.
Explanation:
This statement is true. When an astronaut steps out for a spacewalk, she and the International Space Station (ISS) are both in orbit around Earth but the astronaut will not stay in place relative to the ISS without a tether holding her to the station.
The reason for this is due to microgravity and the properties of motion in space. The astronaut and the ISS are both in free-fall around the Earth, so in the absence of other forces, they would continue along their separate paths. Without a tether, even a small force (like the push off the astronaut does to get away from the airlock) can cause her to drift away from the station.
While the ISS and the astronaut do influence each other gravitationally, this effect is extremely small compared to the force of Earth's gravity. So, without a tether, the astronaut can float away from the ISS.
Learn more about Physics of Spacewalk here:https://brainly.com/question/27035713
#SPJ3
In the design of a supermarket, there are to be several ramps connecting different parts of the store. Customers will have to push grocery carts up the ramps and it is obviously desirable that this not be too difficult. The engineer has done a survey and found that almost no one complains if the force directed up the ramp is no more than 20N .
Ignoring friction, at what maximum angle θ should the ramps be built, assuming a full 30kg grocery cart?
Express your answer using two significant figures.
Answer:
3.90 degrees
Explanation:
Let g= 9.81 m/s2. The gravity of the 30kg grocery cart is
W = mg = 30*9.81 = 294.3 N
This gravity is split into 2 components on the ramp, 1 parallel and the other perpendicular to the ramp.
We can calculate the parallel one since it's the one that affects the force required to push up
F = WsinΘ
Since customer would not complain if the force is no more than 20N
F = 20
[tex]294.3sin\theta = 20[/tex]
[tex]sin\theta = 20/294.3 = 0.068[/tex]
[tex]\theta = sin^{-1}0.068 = 0.068 rad = 0.068*180/\pi \approx 3.90^0[/tex]
So the ramp cannot be larger than 3.9 degrees
Technician A says dc circuits are not normally used in automotive circuits. Technician B says certain automotive computer sensors use ac. Who is right?
Answer:
A & B are correct
Explanation:
Certain automotive sensors like crank shaft position sensor uses a.c. while most automotive components require DC to work properly through the battery which is incorporated with an alternator to keep it charged through a diode while continual supply of DC is sustained.
Technician A is incorrect as DC circuits are commonly used in automobiles, and Technician B is partially correct since some automotive sensors can generate an AC signal.
Explanation:In the scenario presented, Technician A says that dc circuits are not normally used in automotive circuits, which is incorrect. DC circuits are indeed commonly used in automobiles for various functions such as starting the engine, powering lights, and running the dashboard instruments. Technician B says that certain automotive computer sensors use ac current. While most sensors in a car operate on DC current, there are some sensors, like variable reluctance sensors, that can generate an AC signal as they operate. Therefore, both statements are not entirely accurate; however, Technician B's statement has some validity regarding the existence of sensors that produce an AC signal within automotive applications.
A balloonist, riding in the basket of a hot air balloon that is rising vertically with a constant velocity of 11.9 m/s, releases a sandbag when the balloon is 43.4 m above the ground. Neglecting air resistance, what is the bag's speed when it hits the ground?
Answer:
v = 31.5 m/s
Explanation:
given,
Speed of air balloon, u = 11.9 m/s
height of balloon above the ground, h = 43.4 m
acceleration due to gravity = 9.8 m/s²
Speed of the bag when it hit the ground = ?
using equation of motion
[tex]v^2 = u^2 + 2 g h[/tex]
[tex]v^2 = 11.9^2 + 2\times 9.8\times 43.4[/tex]
[tex]v= \sqrt{992.25}[/tex]
v = 31.5 m/s
Speed of the bag before it hit the ground is equal to v = 31.5 m/s
Applying the physics of kinematics, specifically the equations of motion, the speed of the sandbag when it hits the ground can be calculated to be 29 m/s.
Explanation:The speed of the sandbag when it hits the ground can be calculated with the concepts of kinematics in physics, in particular, the equations of motion. Considering that the positive direction is upwards and the balloon is moving upward at a velocity of 11.9 m/s, the initial velocity (vi) of the sandbag is +11.9 m/s. The sandbag is then acted upon by gravity, which imparts a downward acceleration of -9.8 m/s2. The final speed (vf), when the sandbag hits the ground, can be calculated using the equation vf2 = vi2 + 2ad, where a is acceleration and d is the distance. Substituting the given values: vf2 = (11.9 m/s)2 + 2*(-9.8 m/s2)*(-43.4 m), we get vf ≈ 29 m/s, which is the speed of the sandbag when it hits the ground.
Learn more about Kinematics here:https://brainly.com/question/35140938
#SPJ3